SI
SI
discoversearch


 Technology Stocks: Apple Inc.  
Posts: 168782 | Member SubjectMarks: 880 | Bans (1)

Share This Board Moderated By: clean86 -- (Moderated) -- Started: 6/26/1996 6:39:00 PM  Revision History

AAPL 524.75-1.3%5:20 PM EDTNews
Welcome to the Apple Inc. board on SI. This thread is moderated. If you wish to participate here, please read at least the first two sections below.

RULES

The basic rule is that all participants must be polite to each other. Try to imagine that you are sitting in a living room with everyone else. Don't say anything you wouldn't say in that situation.

No name calling. Disagree with another person's words all you want, but don't insult the person.

Due to SI policy, political comments are off limits here, unless there is an issue that specifically affects Apple. See below for a bit more about this if you care.

It's all about having a civil discussion. And hey, let's be careful out there.

You've now read the rules. If you want to know what happens if you violate them, see "BANS," below.


OFF TOPIC POSTS

Off-topic posts are OK, unless they violate the rules as laid out above. We request that you put "OT" at the top of any posts that aren't related to Apple, its stock, or its competitors. Forgetting to use OT is not an offense that will get you banned. It will just make others shun you. ;-)

Please keep in mind that this forum is here to help people make better decisions about whether or not to invest in AAPL. But there is a kind of a collegial, dinner party atmosphere, and we do go off the reservation quite a bit.


BANS

Violators of the rules will usually receive a warning, and a second offense will probably result in a ban. In the case of especially egregious violations, a ban may come without warning.

When warranted, a ban may be imposed for being a general nuisance and/or generally disrupting civil discourse.

If you have been banned, but would like to be reinstated as a thread participant, it's simple, really. Send me a PM, agreeing to abide by the rules henceforth. The reinstatement will be conditional for ninety days, during which time the ban will be reinstated without warning if there are new infractions.

The above notwithstanding, the moderator reserves the right to keep a ban in place despite the user's request to have it rescinded, on a case by case basis.

All decisions about bans are made by the moderator, who serves at the pleasure of the participants of the thread. You may feel free to provide public or private feedback, which may or may not be heeded.

Fleshing out the anti-politics policy

Having conferred with Brad via PM, I want to clarify this board's policy with respect to political discussions.

If a political issue affects Apple as a company more than it would most companies, it's fair game for discussion here. A hypothetical example would be if Congress were debating a bill that would make it illegal for anyone to download any media file to more than one device. Clearly, Apple would be affected a lot more by the outcome of such a debate than would, say, IBM, Dell, HP, etc.

If a political issue affects the macro economy in some way, but doesn't affect Apple any more than it would any other company, it is not a topic for discussion here.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsDate
168782 So while it is obvious that Ryan is a plant by the hedge funds that are short Aslacker711-11:16:08 PM
168781I don't know who Ryan is but I would not be surprised that he was a hedge fu16yearcycle-11:12:12 PM
168780He said he would consider buying it when it's under $200. He meant he would Sr K-10:55:50 PM
168779I'm calling BS. I seriously doubt you would buy the stock no matter what itclean86-10:13:44 PM
168778Will Apple’s cash return get Icahn to shut up? SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — ApJ.F. Sebastian-08:58:02 PM
168777>800 million iTunes accounts, most of them with credit card numbers. From TSr K-08:45:02 PM
168776Did you make that graphic yourself or find it somewhere?I made that version myseyofal-08:31:33 PM
168775There are at least 5 other candidates I'd remove from the Dow Jones IndustriSr K107:33:23 PM
168774Apple pie? SiouxPal-06:47:04 PM
168773I am happy to have been wrong about what I expected from Apple this past quarterNeal Guttenberg306:34:32 PM
168772The share count, by the balance sheet, is 861,745 (thousands), down 37,468 (in tSr K106:29:44 PM
168771Hi everyone, I don't post on this thread much, but I do follow AAPL stock. Tenchusatsu306:21:13 PM
168770If I knew that Apple would make $50, then $53, then $56, $59, $62, I'd be a pyslent-06:16:28 PM
168769 They haven't grown from that level - it hasn't been a year. Sure, buslacker711106:13:06 PM
168768 First 5 minutes of call set the tone: 5:02 PM Tim Cook is starting the call..MGV-06:12:50 PM
168767Henry, I'm going to go out on a limb and forecast the initiation of a major MGV306:10:42 PM
168766Boring. Re: If I knew that Apple would make $50, then $53, then $56, $59, $62 Sr K406:06:11 PM
168765" ... although ASP dropped to $596 from $613 a year ago." The change iMGV106:05:41 PM
168764TC is citing some very strong switching numbers to iPhone from Android. MGV105:56:00 PM
168763Moving goalposts again. You said that they were "insanely undervalued"Ryan Bartholomew-05:54:44 PM
168762On top of everything else, the ta guys are going to be falling all over themselv16yearcycle-05:54:28 PM
168761I beeze rich at 7 shares:) Kurthend-05:52:35 PM
168760It's time to celebrate. Congratulations to the Apple bulls! Open 7 bottlesRoad Walker105:50:54 PM
168759It's time to celebrate. Congratulations to the Apple bulls! Proof of growtMGV305:48:10 PM
168758"I am blown away by the iPhone numbers in light of the expectations Apple sMGV-05:47:01 PM
168757Seems like more of a pointless discussion that isn't ever going to go anywheclean86-05:42:30 PM
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2014 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.