SI
SI
discoversearch

Biotech / Medical
Nanoviricides - The Other Board
An SI Board Since September 2017
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
101 3 0 NNVC
Emcee:  Its_lose_not_loose Type:  Moderated
This board is useful for presenting a counter-perspective to the shill-majority SI NNVC board(s) and the shill-moderated ihub board. Speak your mind - there are no bans here, even for the those NNVC shills who occasionally post here.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
101Yes, I'll bet you receive as much enjoyment watching this board as I do watcIts_lose_not_looselast Wednesday
100Nothing yet. But yet is the key word. Have a great evening. It's actualdrkazlast Wednesday
99I wonder how much this savvy investor has made on NNVC. Agreed. Most of my inveIts_lose_not_looselast Wednesday
98Has fun losing money. The psychosis is getting worse. IMHHO, anyone trying to mIts_lose_not_looselast Wednesday
97Yes. And shills are paid to pump, not to make sense.Its_lose_not_looselast Wednesday
96My main concern with money these days is how to get rid of it... Thus NNVC! Wellarvitarlast Wednesday
95How did this all turn out? "http://siliconinvestor.com/nfvda/boards/reIts_lose_not_looselast Wednesday
94drkazmd65 of ihub being a general dipshit again: drkazmd65 Tuesday, 10/17/17 Its_lose_not_looselast Wednesday
93On ihub, I always read with jocund fascination the posts between the mutual admiIts_lose_not_looselast Wednesday
92One of the tasks of investing, DD, etc. is the necessity for filtering out wild-Its_lose_not_looselast Wednesday
91I presented this letter to the ihub community back in 2014. Most of it is still Its_lose_not_looselast Wednesday
90How many carrots must be dangled before the donkeys realize they're never goIts_lose_not_looselast Wednesday
89Need a good chuckle? Then read on: The fact that the material is being presenIts_lose_not_looselast Wednesday
88Ubertino used to be a moderator on ihub. I wonder what happened to that? silicoIts_lose_not_looselast Tuesday
87Another failed prediciton by Ubertino: siliconinvestor.com "http://silicoIts_lose_not_looselast Tuesday
86I said she was a clinician without the requisite scientific expertise, not a sciarvitarlast Tuesday
85Ubertino's price prediction in 2005 of $500 in 2 or 3 years. http://silicIts_lose_not_looselast Tuesday
84Ubertino's price prediction of $200 in 2005. siliconinvestor.com "httIts_lose_not_looselast Tuesday
83Yeah, stop it. the message board police so demand it. Trendliner Tuesday, 10/Its_lose_not_looselast Tuesday
82This ubertino of ihub thinks there is some significance to Boniuk being named asIts_lose_not_looselast Tuesday
81Take a moment to travel to the nanoviricides website to view the imcompetence ofIts_lose_not_looselast Tuesday
80The market has grown immune to the PRs which, on the surface, portend positive nIts_lose_not_looselast Tuesday
79The tangled web we weave...Its_lose_not_looselast Tuesday
78That same person said exactly the opposite a few minutes prior on another board:arvitarlast Tuesday
77Another blathering, phychosis-induced post from ihub's ubernano: "WellIts_lose_not_looselast Tuesday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2017 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.