Copper Fox
An SI Board Since February 2011
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8019 136 9 CUU
Emcee:  Metacomet Type:  Moderated
Board established to discuss issues related to the Copper Fox company and it's Schaft Creek developments in the northern British Columbia region known as the Golden Triangle.

As many are joining this board, having previously participated on the StockHouse or Agoracom boards, there are some differences in how posts and posters are treated here

There is no censorship function

Nothing written will be deleted

Whatever anyone posts, as long as it relates to something relative to Copper Fox will stand on its own merit

Spam is not tolerated on SI

This is a site rule, rigidly enforced (StockHouse vets will appreciate this)

Moderators here are the folks who start the individual boards

They determine their ongoing role and currently I see that role as simply a contributor

Let's all just get along

However, like any ad hoc public forum, a level of collegiality would be appreciated, and the responsibility for maintaining this blissful state may be assured by censure on a very selective basis

There is an ignore function so each person is free to self moderate as they see fit

Hope we get as lively a discussion here as we sometimes enjoyed at the other joints....

Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8019Under the J/V conditions. No one would pay more than Teck refuses to. As no louel-yesterday
8018I hope it's not just gas, appreciate all the great info you put out nice couZep70-Wednesday
8017Sometimes the best investment decisions come from the gut. Sometimes logic doesmudguy-Wednesday
8016Just like Mudguy, I don't hold any shares at the moment. I still read this Stockowner-Wednesday
8015Great discussion here past few days especially mudguy.You have it nailed down pespecboy2012-Wednesday
8014Thanks mud for your point of view appreciate it but the gambler in me says take Zep70-Wednesday
8013As opposed to other venues, we appreciate everybodys thinking on this investmentMetacomet-Wednesday
8012I'm not dead set against it, I'm just waiting for the opportunity to re-mudguy3Wednesday
8011With all do respect and please don't take this the wrong way but if your so Zep70-Wednesday
8010Based on what? I think the risks to a third party buyer are substantial, given mudguy2Wednesday
8009A third party is not going to buy into this and the risk of that is nil. Who inUnderhill69-Wednesday
8008Notice how they talk about Copper business (main mines), then Copper DevelopmentUnderhill69-Wednesday
8007Sorry mudguy and Jim not buying it but you never know , call me crazy but I haveZep70-Wednesday
8005Seems like a conflict of interest but we will just have to wait and see how thisJim_Soley-Wednesday
8004 A third party is not going to buy into this and the risk of that is nil. Who imudguy2Wednesday
8003Not wanting a third company coming in and making an offer for us. Seems like a cpac-Wednesday
8002Why would they keep development of a project under the radar when the message ismudguy2Wednesday
8001You could look at it that way and another way to look at it would be that they acpac-Wednesday
8000 Long road ahead...hardly even mention the word Schaft Teck Reports Unaudited Jim_Soley2Wednesday
7999you wouldn't believe the numbers... (or you shouldn't believe the numbersense-Tuesday
7998Both of the Carmax drill holes DDH0121 and DDH0122 are good drill holes, IMHO.Riskkee-Tuesday
7997Sombrero Butte, Question was asked if they made this payment. Reply from Lynn BSerafin1Tuesday
7996Pushed back maybe,but not cancelled.Underhill69-Tuesday
7995So I guess the Preliminary Economic Assessment that was supposed to be completedbrundall-Tuesday
7994I called an they never mentioned that to me,even so does not mean something won&Zep70-Tuesday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2014 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.