SI
SI
discoversearch

Gold/Mining/Energy
Copper Fox
An SI Board Since February 2011
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
7957 135 9 CUU
Emcee:  Metacomet Type:  Moderated
Board established to discuss issues related to the Copper Fox company and it's Schaft Creek developments in the northern British Columbia region known as the Golden Triangle.

As many are joining this board, having previously participated on the StockHouse or Agoracom boards, there are some differences in how posts and posters are treated here

There is no censorship function

Nothing written will be deleted

Whatever anyone posts, as long as it relates to something relative to Copper Fox will stand on its own merit

Spam is not tolerated on SI

This is a site rule, rigidly enforced (StockHouse vets will appreciate this)

Moderators here are the folks who start the individual boards

They determine their ongoing role and currently I see that role as simply a contributor

Let's all just get along

However, like any ad hoc public forum, a level of collegiality would be appreciated, and the responsibility for maintaining this blissful state may be assured by censure on a very selective basis

There is an ignore function so each person is free to self moderate as they see fit

Hope we get as lively a discussion here as we sometimes enjoyed at the other joints....

Del
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7957The other answer to... "This was filed on SEDAR... How is an investor supsense-28 minutes ago
7956If you read the fine print on SEDAR... the government doesn't accept any ressense-49 minutes ago
7955I agree with that... CUU is lucky (?) that Teck didn't just take Shaft Creesense-an hour ago
7954Well, I'm certainly disqualifying Copper Fox management as being a managemensense-an hour ago
7953If you were teck would you spend 3 billion on a mine before doing you own analysCUUallin-an hour ago
7952Ok, i see the filing now... April 7, 2011 and it was listed as Material Informatblackblue-an hour ago
7951They wrote a PR saying "its positive"... and that means that it is ? sense-an hour ago
7950 A couple of excellent questions: ["Management trumps Geology----why is sense-an hour ago
7949You are posting the summary information about the Salazar agreement contained inexplorationguy-2 hours ago
7948Now why was Salazar agreement scrapped? That's one thing that I don't unMetacomet-2 hours ago
7947Thank you for posting this. Now why was Salazar agreement scrapped? That's blackblue-2 hours ago
7946There was a youtube video posted on another site from a year ago where Mr StewarTheotokos-3 hours ago
7945It's actually $67 million....I was mistaken At the prices used in the basebrundall-3 hours ago
7944You wrote A positive BFS... cannot possibly be defined as one requiring that Texplorationguy-3 hours ago
7943There was a youtube video posted on another site from a year ago where Mr StewarUnderhill69-3 hours ago
7942Ok. Under the Salazar agreement what would you like to have seen happen. CUUallin-3 hours ago
7941our after tax NPV at 8% is around $45 million?????? Are u basing that on numberUnderhill69-3 hours ago
7940 A positive BFS... cannot possibly be defined as one requiring that Teck would cMetacomet-3 hours ago
7939What you are getting wrong is the same thing many others here appear to be gettisense23 hours ago
7938If teck ever walked we would look much worse than Duluth metals right now Teck brundall34 hours ago
7937This was filed on SEDAR How is an investor supposed to know what to do if the gMetacomet-4 hours ago
7936docs.google.comMetacomet-5 hours ago
7935The deal we got was good. If teck ever walked we would look much worse than CUUallin-5 hours ago
7934Sorry for going back, but this is what I found in the Salazar agreement (pasted blackblue-5 hours ago
7933There was no requirement for a "plan" ..that would have been well beMetacomet28 hours ago
7932Great posts thanks for all the great info. I know sense was thinking about gettiZep70-9 hours ago
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2014 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.