SI
SI
discoversearch


 Gold/Mining/Energy: Copper Fox  
Posts: 7217 | Member SubjectMarks: 124 | Bans (5)

Share This Board Moderated By: Metacomet -- (Moderated) -- Started: 2/22/2011 11:33:19 AM  Revision History

CUU 0.520.0%Oct 11 8:29 PM EDTNews
Board established to discuss issues related to the Copper Fox company and it's Schaft Creek developments in the northern British Columbia region known as the Golden Triangle.

As many are joining this board, having previously participated on the StockHouse or Agoracom boards, there are some differences in how posts and posters are treated here

There is no censorship function

Nothing written will be deleted

Whatever anyone posts, as long as it relates to something relative to Copper Fox will stand on its own merit

Spam is not tolerated on SI

This is a site rule, rigidly enforced (StockHouse vets will appreciate this)

Moderators here are the folks who start the individual boards

They determine their ongoing role and currently I see that role as simply a contributor

Let's all just get along

However, like any ad hoc public forum, a level of collegiality would be appreciated, and the responsibility for maintaining this blissful state may be assured by censure on a very selective basis

There is an ignore function so each person is free to self moderate as they see fit

Hope we get as lively a discussion here as we sometimes enjoyed at the other joints....

Del
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsDate
7217Gordy The transmission line being connected will carry no importance as far aslouel-01:33:18 PM
7216New VP development at Teck. I wonder what his thoughts on SC are. Maybe sCUUallin-04/17/2014 07:29 PM
7215I'm in agreement with you Gordy. good post. babybreeze-04/17/2014 02:29 PM
7214As brutal, and accurate an assessment as that is, it is really quite charitable Metacomet-04/17/2014 09:53 AM
7213Here are my thoughts.. Copper Fox management has basically ignored the retail iGordy Sez-04/17/2014 09:41 AM
72121. Van Dyke drilling results. Drilling commenced on the 7 holes on the 19th MarcRiskkee-04/16/2014 11:15 PM
7211NTL is the biggie for me. Only 1 big mine planned to connect. How will BCCUUallin-04/16/2014 05:57 PM
7210Over the next 6 weeks there are some interesting events coming up. 1. Van Dykbrundall-04/16/2014 11:47 AM
7209Not really sure what all that means? Any ideas CUUallin-04/15/2014 08:49 PM
7208all those earlier sell trades by Edward Jones have disappeared from the detail sbrundall-04/15/2014 04:18 PM
7207The Chinese typically only buy copper projects at or very close to production. jarome-04/15/2014 02:15 PM
7206Someone at Edward Jones wanted out in a big way this morning.... Last 25 Tradesbrundall-04/15/2014 10:56 AM
7205here are the replies 10 Comments skier9 1 day ago The Chinese are flush withxwolf-04/15/2014 01:57 AM
7204while we get circle jerked by our "management" ... Chinese group bxwolf-04/15/2014 01:47 AM
7203Why would Copper Fox make an offer to Teck before they have extracted full valuebrundall-04/14/2014 12:01 PM
7202I think personally it will be wrapped up sooner than later. Teck will want toCUUallin-04/14/2014 11:27 AM
7201I agree with you when you say not drilling the waste rock was a mistake. Have babybreeze-04/14/2014 11:10 AM
7200$4B capex already spent. Xstrata took a soaking, but not as much as they might mudguy104/14/2014 09:31 AM
7199Is it odd that minmetsls paid 6 billion for a mine that's almost built and hCUUallin-04/14/2014 08:39 AM
7198Las bombast sold. Anyone know his much was already spent on cap ex ? Might gCUUallin-04/14/2014 08:18 AM
7197I totally agree with the possibility of some objective other than showing the beMetacomet-04/12/2014 02:40 PM
7196I think not drilling the waste was a mistake, but the drilling last year has proCUUallin-04/12/2014 01:24 PM
7195 There is always more to the story than we can know. I watch a lot of companiesmudguy104/11/2014 11:43 PM
7194You refuse to consider why it wasn't drilled.. That is the answer to the shMetacomet-04/11/2014 08:39 PM
7193 But the inferred is there and is mineralized. And I have yet to hear anyone CUUallin-04/11/2014 08:37 PM
7192Instead of poking holes in new targets and buying claims that could have been exMetacomet-04/11/2014 08:15 PM
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2014 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.