SI
SI
discoversearch

Technology Stocks
Cisco Systems, Inc. - Off-topic postings
An SI Board Since November 2007
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
229 9 0 CSCO
Emcee:  Lynn Type:  Moderated
Post OT-CSCO postings here. Most of the off-topic discussion on the main CSCO thread has been informative. Putting the OT discussion here enables greater discussion than is possible on the main CSCO thread. It also makes later reference to non-CSCO news and stock discussion easier.

For on-topic CSCO discussion, please go here:

Subject 414
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
229Bullish crossover in MACD and Stochastic oscillators. [graphic]hollyhunter-August 28
228Has anyone been followoing Edgewater Wireless Systems (YFI.V)?The Diversified Bro-August 22
227Hi Lynn, Yeah, I've hunkered down too. regardsEric-12/1/2008
226Hi Eric, I'm around more off than on since the rug got pulled out from undeLynn-12/1/2008
225Lynn, Are you still around? Things have been quiet except for the markets.Eric-11/18/2008
224BUY OR SELL-Are solar stocks too cheap to pass up? Mon Oct 20, 2008 4:09pm By NLynn-10/24/2008
223I think Goldman jumped the gun a little. If the tax credits had not passed I woEric-10/13/2008
222Goldman issued a piece trashing the solar stocks today... Best regards, John SJohn Koligman110/7/2008
221Lynn Good story.Eric-10/6/2008
220Scientists develop solar cells with a twist By Julie Steenhuysen Sun Oct 5, 1:0Lynn-10/5/2008
219Europe agrees bank crisis action Europe's biggest economies have agreed Eric-10/4/2008
218October 3, 2008, 6:22 pm Congress sets stage for solar boom After months of faiEric-10/3/2008
217I'm posting the entire article for easy reference later (I'm dial-up): Lynn-9/30/2008
216This story came out over the weekend. For those of us who believe in Peak Oil hEric-9/22/2008
215Dave, Yes we certainly need all hands on deck for this problem. The energy crisEric-9/20/2008
214Eric, thanks for the detailed reply. I have no disagreement with the points youSailtrader-9/19/2008
213Nukes work and many years ago (almost 35 to be precise) I thought we would have Eric-9/16/2008
212Eric, how about nuclear power generation? Think about which party stopped nucSailtrader19/16/2008
211I totally agree with your points. We could have been on the road to solving ourEric-9/16/2008
210Right. The thing is that in the US, if it's 15-20 years out, no one cares anmindmeld-9/16/2008
209<i>Do you want Iran to stop feeling so able to act with impunity? Make it Sailtrader-9/14/2008
208Sailtrader, we spend more money on the military than the rest of the world combimindmeld-9/14/2008
207Mindmeld, I'll agree to disagree on those points but will be back with a remSailtrader19/13/2008
206I don't think so, Sailtrader. The tax incentives given to the oil companies mindmeld-9/13/2008
205Great ideas mindmeld -- I like the use of tax incentives vs subsidies, and I totSailtrader-9/13/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2017 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.