SI
SI
discoversearch

Biotech / Medical
Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
45218 282 23 IMMU
Emcee:  erickerickson Type:  Moderated
Welcome to the moderated Silicon Investor message board for Immunomedics (IMMU). After watching several other forums degenerate, I decided to start this forum for anyone who values reasonable discussion. I've made it a moderated board so I have some control over whether it stays civil or not...

Please observe the following courtesies:

> No personal attacks. This includes attributing motives to posters. You know, "you are a pumper", or "you must be short", or..... Such accusations are unprovable in the first place and in the second place contribute nothing to the discussion.

> Please refrain from posts about posts. If you see a post you find obnoxious or that you think violates the TOU, just report a TOU violation to the SI admins by clicking the link near the bottom. The SI admins have been doing a great job of removing all traces of posters who violate the spirit of SI TOU (see below). Responding only encourages more of the same as well as decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio. See "Responding to Tone" below.

> We very much value differing viewpoints. Feel free to disagree with someone all you want. Just do so civilly.

> Take a look at Graham's "hierarchy of disagreement": Hierarchy if you want an idea of what I consider actionable. In my ideal world, when people disagree, their posts would be at least "contradiction" and ideally "counterargument" and above. I'll start to create a mental list of people skating close to the edge when I see posts at "Responding to Tone". Anything below that earns a censure (not censor since I can't alter or delete existing posts, only the SI admins have that power) as soon as I see it, with or without warning.

You can see the SI Terms Of Use (TOU) at siliconinvestor.com and it's apparent that the admins interpret these rather broadly. They give the usual sophistries people engage in when trying to skate close to the edge short shrift. My personal summary of the TOU is "play nice, be adult". SIAdmin (Dave) and SI Spam Patrol (Cheeky Kid) are our friends <G>. Here is a wonderful example of how this works... 8320. Note SI Dave's response was there prior to any other poster posting. Don't waste your time....

Again, welcome! I think you'll find this a fine place to learn about and contribute to others' understanding of IMMU and its prospects.

Erick
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
45218Great find Sogwap, that’s the first time I’ve heard that this was a possibility.idahoranch1-3 minutes ago
45217 Phil Higdon? @plhky3465 More Pay attn to comments starting at 03:45 markplhky3465-4 minutes ago
45216Phil, Another good point the CEO made during the JP Morgan conference was aboutsummer_sky-59 minutes ago
45215Start listening at the 03:45 mark....what he says IF TRUE could be GREAT for IMMplhky34657an hour ago
45214Not much in article but great video talks about FDA AA approval, etc. foxnews.csogwap124 hours ago
45213Dear Mr. Erickson: Please check on the integrity of your account here. Some imbFitzhughlaw-yesterday
45212To: Mr. Fitzhughlaw, Esq. re: Cease and Desist Mr. Fitzhughlaw: I must respeerickerickson1yesterday
45211See that? You liked my post and as I've told you before, I can do some pretFitzhughlaw1yesterday
45210Totally agree Michael, it’s a world of difference. Having said that, we are goinidahoranch13yesterday
45209First of all, the release of IGN is driven by law. More importantly, I think thiFitzhughlaw12yesterday
45208I guess I should have stated it another way ? I wish they had saved the little bsogwap1-yesterday
45207:Wonder where this can go from $15-20" ? Here's a good example : financsogwap1-yesterday
45206We’ve had plenty of it. Got spoiled. Give ‘em a break. Very confident all are ladyPI7yesterday
45205We could use a little positive news.sogwap1-yesterday
45204And we were under $4 12 months ago... profit taking for someerippetoe-yesterday
45203Felt like it, didn’t it. Profit taking and then fear, buyers backing off underidahoranch12Tuesday
45202Idaho, are you sure that wasn't a sell order for 650000?watchmymovement-Tuesday
45201I agree. Adding here, just started too early in the day... :)erippetoe-Tuesday
45200We’ve also seen knee jerk reactions before. This will self correct. We are in aDietman1Tuesday
45199I think it's a sector move; biotechs are down almost across the board.drtom12342Tuesday
45198I wonder if this news is what is bringing us down: "The U.S. Food and Drugweatherproof6Tuesday
45197The article below is the sort of thing which I hope awaits 132. Combination therallatwwk6Tuesday
45196Idaho, Perfect buying opp... better price if you didn't close the deal yestDietman2Tuesday
45195Well, until a Gris Gris violation.............idahoranch13Monday
45194Nope, kept "practicing" but never got the hang of it, so I decided to Fitzhughlaw-Monday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2018 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.