SI
SI
discoversearch

Biotech / Medical
Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
27756 146 0 IMMU
Emcee:  erickerickson Type:  Moderated
Welcome to the moderated Silicon Investor message board for Immunomedics (IMMU). After watching several other forums degenerate, I decided to start this forum for anyone who values reasonable discussion. I've made it a moderated board so I have some control over whether it stays civil or not...

Please observe the following courtesies:

> No personal attacks. This includes attributing motives to posters. You know, "you are a pumper", or "you must be short", or..... Such accusations are unprovable in the first place and in the second place contribute nothing to the discussion.

> Please refrain from posts about posts. If you see a post you find obnoxious or that you think violates the TOU, just report a TOU violation to the SI admins by clicking the link near the bottom. The SI admins have been doing a great job of removing all traces of posters who violate the spirit of SI TOU (see below). Responding only encourages more of the same as well as decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio. See "Responding to Tone" below.

> We very much value differing viewpoints. Feel free to disagree with someone all you want. Just do so civilly.

> Take a look at Graham's "hierarchy of disagreement": en.wikipedia.org if you want an idea of what I consider actionable. In my ideal world, when people disagree, their posts would be at least "contradiction" and ideally "counterargument" and above. I'll start to create a mental list of people skating close to the edge when I see posts at "Responding to Tone". Anything below that earns a censure (not censor since I can't alter or delete existing posts, only the SI admins have that power) as soon as I see it, with or without warning.

You can see the SI Terms Of Use (TOU) at siliconinvestor.com and it's apparent that the admins interpret these rather broadly. They give the usual sophistries people engage in when trying to skate close to the edge short shrift. My personal summary of the TOU is "play nice, be adult". SIAdmin (Dave) and SI Spam Patrol (Cheeky Kid) are our friends <G>. Here is a wonderful example of how this works... 8320. Note SI Dave's response was there prior to any other poster posting. Don't waste your time....

Again, welcome! I think you'll find this a fine place to learn about and contribute to others' understanding of IMMU and its prospects.

Erick
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
27756Gary I have been paying attention for about 20 years. How long you Been a sharehtommsel1-2 hours ago
27755If I remember correctly. I emailed Chau after the last cc and he did reply that summer_sky13 hours ago
27754I do think duwhee makes a good point. Not sure how long Dhingra has been at IMMallatwwk-4 hours ago
27753Has Mr. Dhingra hit the one year mark in his consultancy? Did the dealmaker deciduwhee-7 hours ago
27752So Gary, how long have you owned IMMU? Fitzhughlaw-7 hours ago
27751that tough question was asked and was answered by mgmt three cc ago, 'by thgary123-7 hours ago
27750Unfortunately it's never a clear cut situation with this company. I will be tommsel119 hours ago
27749No rules for press releases, those are legal material, and must be disseminate gary123-10 AM
27748Here are the rules for presenting at the ECO. They do seem to limit what the comidahoranch129 AM
27747I guess I missed something, who was trying to sell that?idahoranch1-9 AM
27746> What don't you buy? I don't buy that there are significant clinicali3511-8 AM
27745<Sorry ... I don't buy it.>> What don't you buy? What is a tridahoranch188 AM
27744dittosogwap1-8 AM
27743Far be it from me to be the voice of reason but Allatwkk hit the nail on the heawilly6118 AM
27742for all the questions raised by this release, its worth noting that IMMU crossedallatwwk-1 AM
27741Yup. I agree with your comments. It's time to show us your cards Dr G. Tiredtommsel1-yesterday
27740I'm with Li on this one . How many times have we not heard this kind of langzevenhuizen-yesterday
27739lots of valid reasons why the complete data set was not released. First, the ADCgary123-yesterday
27738The provisional results were presented by Dr. David M. Goldenberg. Why would itmoverman-yesterday
27737Sorry ... I don't buy it. The company isn't holding back. What they sali35111yesterday
27736I believe the movie is in Barcelona and this was the trailer. I'm hearing thidahoranch1-yesterday
27735Not sure why they are holding out. However the meeting today in San Diego is smstockdoc771yesterday
27734<What we really need to know is a breakdown of the patients by cancer type, aKeeptheFaith-yesterday
27733The term "Key Opinion Leaders" or "KOL" is very commonly usestockdoc77-yesterday
27732""We plan to complete the Phase 2 study before the end of this year. Dduwhee-yesterday
27731What we really need to know is "who our major partner is".sogwap1-yesterday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2014 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.