Biotech / Medical
Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
35225 189 1 IMMU
Emcee:  erickerickson Type:  Moderated
Welcome to the moderated Silicon Investor message board for Immunomedics (IMMU). After watching several other forums degenerate, I decided to start this forum for anyone who values reasonable discussion. I've made it a moderated board so I have some control over whether it stays civil or not...

Please observe the following courtesies:

> No personal attacks. This includes attributing motives to posters. You know, "you are a pumper", or "you must be short", or..... Such accusations are unprovable in the first place and in the second place contribute nothing to the discussion.

> Please refrain from posts about posts. If you see a post you find obnoxious or that you think violates the TOU, just report a TOU violation to the SI admins by clicking the link near the bottom. The SI admins have been doing a great job of removing all traces of posters who violate the spirit of SI TOU (see below). Responding only encourages more of the same as well as decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio. See "Responding to Tone" below.

> We very much value differing viewpoints. Feel free to disagree with someone all you want. Just do so civilly.

> Take a look at Graham's "hierarchy of disagreement": if you want an idea of what I consider actionable. In my ideal world, when people disagree, their posts would be at least "contradiction" and ideally "counterargument" and above. I'll start to create a mental list of people skating close to the edge when I see posts at "Responding to Tone". Anything below that earns a censure (not censor since I can't alter or delete existing posts, only the SI admins have that power) as soon as I see it, with or without warning.

You can see the SI Terms Of Use (TOU) at and it's apparent that the admins interpret these rather broadly. They give the usual sophistries people engage in when trying to skate close to the edge short shrift. My personal summary of the TOU is "play nice, be adult". SIAdmin (Dave) and SI Spam Patrol (Cheeky Kid) are our friends <G>. Here is a wonderful example of how this works... 8320. Note SI Dave's response was there prior to any other poster posting. Don't waste your time....

Again, welcome! I think you'll find this a fine place to learn about and contribute to others' understanding of IMMU and its prospects.

Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
35225Selling short on a targeted stock as the share price moves up is like longs aversysiphus1an hour ago
35224my opinion on the shorts is a bit different than the rest and hasnt changed in willy611an hour ago
35223No expert here either, but this looks too obvious. Not so much the shorts have bEMU2-2 hours ago
35222I know this time it's different. I hope so. But I can't help reminding mtommsel1-4 hours ago
35221I wouldn't be too sure about that. Huge short position to cover. If you wantsogwap1-5 hours ago
35220I think we old timers here all feel the same way about being right this time andladyPI-6 hours ago
35219I absolutely expect a sell off after ASCO. But this time I look at it as a real tommsel116 hours ago
35218"this time is different" It is. All developmental bios have shortsgaduntz73112 AM
35217Well, I'm certainly puzzled. But then again, I think trying to ascribe everyerickerickson1yesterday
35216I have to say very happy about the move, but this whole thing is freaking me outstockdoc771yesterday
35215Agree, my wife has Indiana covered....:)rodneyh07-yesterday
35214Lets see if this works... the Wolverine push to keep it at $4.50 or aboveduwhee-yesterday
35213 Whoa there willy... someone is using my image without permission.duwhee-yesterday
35212Allright then I guess it's [graphic]willy611yesterday
35211Wait a second - I thought I was moving in with YOU!!! Then again, if you'reFitzhughlaw-yesterday
35210Very little news, but a company with an ADC that has FDA BTD, two prized sessionidahoranch12yesterday
35209In my optimistic moments I agree with your predictions. I am firmly attached tostockdoc77-yesterday
35208I think what we have here is the proverbial climbing the wall of worry A lot ofwilly611yesterday
35207>>Leak?<< Just a little bit.weatherproof-yesterday
35206Size June $4 and $5-strike calls are being bot. A total of 8,000 between the twogissa_gamma-yesterday
35205What was that?!?!?! Short Covering? Leak?EagleRare-yesterday
35204No doubt there are some exciting things going on around IMMU-132. I am not wellweatherproof3yesterday
35203They've already started enrolling patients in this "second half" oidahoranch11yesterday
35202Two things, drtom: Dr G has been quite attentive to OS with regard to the ph2 Tweatherproof-yesterday
35201If the shorts had covered in the 1's or 2's, then I'd agree that theidahoranch13Tuesday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2016 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.