Biotech / Medical
Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
41955 233 2 IMMU
Emcee:  erickerickson Type:  Moderated
Welcome to the moderated Silicon Investor message board for Immunomedics (IMMU). After watching several other forums degenerate, I decided to start this forum for anyone who values reasonable discussion. I've made it a moderated board so I have some control over whether it stays civil or not...

Please observe the following courtesies:

> No personal attacks. This includes attributing motives to posters. You know, "you are a pumper", or "you must be short", or..... Such accusations are unprovable in the first place and in the second place contribute nothing to the discussion.

> Please refrain from posts about posts. If you see a post you find obnoxious or that you think violates the TOU, just report a TOU violation to the SI admins by clicking the link near the bottom. The SI admins have been doing a great job of removing all traces of posters who violate the spirit of SI TOU (see below). Responding only encourages more of the same as well as decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio. See "Responding to Tone" below.

> We very much value differing viewpoints. Feel free to disagree with someone all you want. Just do so civilly.

> Take a look at Graham's "hierarchy of disagreement": Hierarchy if you want an idea of what I consider actionable. In my ideal world, when people disagree, their posts would be at least "contradiction" and ideally "counterargument" and above. I'll start to create a mental list of people skating close to the edge when I see posts at "Responding to Tone". Anything below that earns a censure (not censor since I can't alter or delete existing posts, only the SI admins have that power) as soon as I see it, with or without warning.

You can see the SI Terms Of Use (TOU) at and it's apparent that the admins interpret these rather broadly. They give the usual sophistries people engage in when trying to skate close to the edge short shrift. My personal summary of the TOU is "play nice, be adult". SIAdmin (Dave) and SI Spam Patrol (Cheeky Kid) are our friends <G>. Here is a wonderful example of how this works... 8320. Note SI Dave's response was there prior to any other poster posting. Don't waste your time....

Again, welcome! I think you'll find this a fine place to learn about and contribute to others' understanding of IMMU and its prospects.

Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
41955I'm still here from $4.75 and waiting for another drop to add while the stocNext_5FU-a minute ago
41954Also still holding. Have sold about 25% of the shares I had at voting time and pzevenhuizen-52 minutes ago
41953nope but this board is superstitious! Down day on Wallstreet, immu was up, so aladyPI2an hour ago
41952youtube.comCelebrityEquity-2 hours ago
41951Still holdingduwhee-2 hours ago
41950I guess everyone sold last week......watchmymovement-3 hours ago
41949"I don't mind buying back shares at $6 near term, upon the exercise of ghettogoulash-yesterday
41948John, in my little world, no matter how much the esteemed, billionaire sharehoarghettogoulash1yesterday
41947Interesting comments about 'going all in'. It really does depend on one&allatwwk1yesterday
41946John, I'm in agreement with that. For years I had two stocks, IMMU and BRK.Aidahoranch13yesterday
41945I was traveling on Friday so I couldn't sign on to my accounts until today. mrc758-yesterday
41944> isn't now the time to go all in? No. While people can invest to varyli35115yesterday
41943Idaho. Good topic. But I would point out that if you held IMMU through the G yJohnBeach5yesterday
41942Given what most of us believe are the facts and probabilities about the IMMU PPSsysiphus-yesterday
41941Small and cheap biotech stocks that I've watched over the years tend to be oidahoranch110yesterday
41940Thanks again Li, for the heads-up. I had sold a small chunk of IMMU below $6 oghettogoulash-yesterday
41939Short position up almost 2 million to 23,753,055. I think there's no quesidahoranch1-Saturday
41938I'll take a stab. Mgmt guidance for submitting an AA application is mid yeargary123-Saturday
41937Haha (b) Of course the Status Quo Board will "decide" not to pursue tghettogoulash-Saturday
41936Wow, things are rolling right along.kdd999-last Friday
41935Hopefully this bit of uncertainty will be behind us soon March 24, 2017 ImmuJohnBeach6last Friday
41934> Who is A. Thompson Bayliss? He is an attorney with the new law firm that tli3511-last Friday
41933 Let me GOOGLE that for you: [graphic]CelebrityEquity-last Friday
41932Who is A. Thompson Bayliss?sysiphus-last Friday
41931Considering I'm drinking at a Happy Hour(s) this is a pretty wild reply...buCelebrityEquity-last Friday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2017 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.