Biotech / Medical
Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
44065 261 20 IMMU
Emcee:  erickerickson Type:  Moderated
Welcome to the moderated Silicon Investor message board for Immunomedics (IMMU). After watching several other forums degenerate, I decided to start this forum for anyone who values reasonable discussion. I've made it a moderated board so I have some control over whether it stays civil or not...

Please observe the following courtesies:

> No personal attacks. This includes attributing motives to posters. You know, "you are a pumper", or "you must be short", or..... Such accusations are unprovable in the first place and in the second place contribute nothing to the discussion.

> Please refrain from posts about posts. If you see a post you find obnoxious or that you think violates the TOU, just report a TOU violation to the SI admins by clicking the link near the bottom. The SI admins have been doing a great job of removing all traces of posters who violate the spirit of SI TOU (see below). Responding only encourages more of the same as well as decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio. See "Responding to Tone" below.

> We very much value differing viewpoints. Feel free to disagree with someone all you want. Just do so civilly.

> Take a look at Graham's "hierarchy of disagreement": Hierarchy if you want an idea of what I consider actionable. In my ideal world, when people disagree, their posts would be at least "contradiction" and ideally "counterargument" and above. I'll start to create a mental list of people skating close to the edge when I see posts at "Responding to Tone". Anything below that earns a censure (not censor since I can't alter or delete existing posts, only the SI admins have that power) as soon as I see it, with or without warning.

You can see the SI Terms Of Use (TOU) at and it's apparent that the admins interpret these rather broadly. They give the usual sophistries people engage in when trying to skate close to the edge short shrift. My personal summary of the TOU is "play nice, be adult". SIAdmin (Dave) and SI Spam Patrol (Cheeky Kid) are our friends <G>. Here is a wonderful example of how this works... 8320. Note SI Dave's response was there prior to any other poster posting. Don't waste your time....

Again, welcome! I think you'll find this a fine place to learn about and contribute to others' understanding of IMMU and its prospects.

Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
44065Anyone can read it, so copy/paste is unnecessary. The comment is here June 18therickerickson227 minutes ago
44064Quote from a commentary "I have files from companies that the CEO’s asked msogwap1-4 hours ago
44063Please copy and paste the item you are referring to, thanks in advance.dorightbythem-4 hours ago
44062I know the article is long but if you read the 4th comment at the very end it misogwap1-8 hours ago
44061I know I've posted this article before but to any of our new investors worthsogwap11yesterday
44060 >>We have an SPA for the phase lll and the end point is PFS. << Tweatherproof2yesterday
44059Couldn't have summarized it better Weather, reading it was like watching a cidahoranch18yesterday
44058OT- Tomorrow will be interesting - SEC reveals 2016 hack that breached its filindorightbythem-Wednesday
44057Well, I refuse to sign up to yet another site to complete reading the article, serickerickson1Wednesday
44056There is an individual on THIS board that writes independent articles for SeekinladyPI2Wednesday
44055Dearest Weather: Well said, and also, this additional point goes into the fFitzhughlaw1Wednesday
44054I finally got around to reading the entire pathetically, unbalanced hit piece thweatherproof14Wednesday
44053BTW, I thought I'd add a footnote to my previous post. While there are stilweatherproof-Wednesday
44052While we can't blindly dismiss any and all opinions that don't fit our oweatherproof4Wednesday
44051I agree, Fitz. There are two competing theories in the political and PR world jargonweary2Wednesday
44050Could also be a ploy just to get the price down in order to buy at lower price. Dietman-Wednesday
44049 Read it and saw that plenty of VenBio 5% investments fail, but I missed the paduwhee-Wednesday
44048There is no reason to reply to this crap. It's just some guy that decided tosukit4Wednesday
44047"I'd say, with the new management in place, a public refutation of thisFitzhughlaw17Wednesday
44046Here's all that you need to read in order to get an answer to your question:Fitzhughlaw6Wednesday
44045The seeking alpha article is extraordinarily negative towards IMMU, IMMU-132, paEagleRare-Wednesday
44044Why? seekingalpha.comCelebrityEquity-Wednesday
44043IDRA 's IMO2125 and it's little brother of IMMU132. I am in both stockssinghisking-Tuesday
44042li -- I got this s-3 was for a future event. What I'm understanding from yallatwwk-Tuesday
44041Key Takeaway Updated '132 data in bladder cancer at ESMO 2017 continue to gissa_gamma14Tuesday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2017 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.