Biotech / Medical
Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
45684 228 23 IMMU
Emcee:  erickerickson Type:  Moderated
Welcome to the moderated Silicon Investor message board for Immunomedics (IMMU). After watching several other forums degenerate, I decided to start this forum for anyone who values reasonable discussion. I've made it a moderated board so I have some control over whether it stays civil or not...

Please observe the following courtesies:

> No personal attacks. This includes attributing motives to posters. You know, "you are a pumper", or "you must be short", or..... Such accusations are unprovable in the first place and in the second place contribute nothing to the discussion.

> Please refrain from posts about posts. If you see a post you find obnoxious or that you think violates the TOU, just report a TOU violation to the SI admins by clicking the link near the bottom. The SI admins have been doing a great job of removing all traces of posters who violate the spirit of SI TOU (see below). Responding only encourages more of the same as well as decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio. See "Responding to Tone" below.

> We very much value differing viewpoints. Feel free to disagree with someone all you want. Just do so civilly.

> Take a look at Graham's "hierarchy of disagreement": Hierarchy if you want an idea of what I consider actionable. In my ideal world, when people disagree, their posts would be at least "contradiction" and ideally "counterargument" and above. I'll start to create a mental list of people skating close to the edge when I see posts at "Responding to Tone". Anything below that earns a censure (not censor since I can't alter or delete existing posts, only the SI admins have that power) as soon as I see it, with or without warning.

You can see the SI Terms Of Use (TOU) at and it's apparent that the admins interpret these rather broadly. They give the usual sophistries people engage in when trying to skate close to the edge short shrift. My personal summary of the TOU is "play nice, be adult". SIAdmin (Dave) and SI Spam Patrol (Cheeky Kid) are our friends <G>. Here is a wonderful example of how this works... 8320. Note SI Dave's response was there prior to any other poster posting. Don't waste your time....

Again, welcome! I think you'll find this a fine place to learn about and contribute to others' understanding of IMMU and its prospects.

Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
45684I cast my votes for the Board of Directors this AM, and I must say, for the 1st sogwap197 hours ago
45683Former cso still presenting in May at this summit pegsummit.comwinners18-yesterday
45682Sad side effect of cancer. my eyes got a little misty thinking about those who cduwhee5Monday
45681"High Hopes"samcat5001Sunday
45680Only slightly off topic. Sorry for the formatting. Meeting Coverage > Addidrtom12342Sunday
45679Dear Esquire, you ain't no ANT but you (& friends) helped knock down &qusamcat500-Sunday
45678With the forecasted buildout of the IMMU portfolio suggested earlier across multRenmanco-Sunday
45677That’s actually a good find winners, I didn’t realize the value of location untiidahoranch12last Saturday
45676exhibit space selecting priorities process I just wonder if asco lewinners183last Saturday
45675asco Not sure if immu have to pay extra to get on to that spot !winners18-last Friday
45674immunomedics at asco Many established oncology cos will bewinners184last Friday
45673Maybe the Doc wasn't delusional after all. I know sympathy for the Doc is ierickerickson2last Friday
45672Caroline Gordon was part of this as well. Jan 30, 2018 Efficacy of Epratuzumab,dorightbythem-last Friday
45671I would like to see a deal for emab that would be favorable enough to the partneidahoranch16last Friday
45670 Yes! Emab will not go quietly into that good night... [graphic]Fitzhughlaw1last Friday
45669I don’t know that it’s alive, but I do know it works and that a 33% placebo respidahoranch16last Friday
45668That's why we're up a 0.01 premarket! ;)erippetoe1last Friday
45667It's Alive! It's Alive! Epratuzumab for the treatmenli35119last Friday
45666Yeah, I tried to avoid being pie in the sky. I was pretty startled at the resultdrtom1234-last Friday
45665OT: Ahem! Having received three degrees from the University of Michigan, I haveerickerickson2last Thursday
45664OT By the way, we got tickets to the NCAA tournament first round today, and plhky34651last Thursday
45663 I'm pretty sure the guy who used to be in charge firmly believes that all oduwhee2last Thursday
45662And you are being very conservative on every point, that is far from a “pie in tidahoranch11last Thursday
45661I don't remember if the board has ever discussed potential revenues(why on edrtom123421last Wednesday
45660Hadn't thought of that, but that sure makes sense. I know I have some shareserickerickson-last Wednesday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2018 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.