Biotech / Medical
Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
29890 165 0 IMMU
Emcee:  erickerickson Type:  Moderated
Welcome to the moderated Silicon Investor message board for Immunomedics (IMMU). After watching several other forums degenerate, I decided to start this forum for anyone who values reasonable discussion. I've made it a moderated board so I have some control over whether it stays civil or not...

Please observe the following courtesies:

> No personal attacks. This includes attributing motives to posters. You know, "you are a pumper", or "you must be short", or..... Such accusations are unprovable in the first place and in the second place contribute nothing to the discussion.

> Please refrain from posts about posts. If you see a post you find obnoxious or that you think violates the TOU, just report a TOU violation to the SI admins by clicking the link near the bottom. The SI admins have been doing a great job of removing all traces of posters who violate the spirit of SI TOU (see below). Responding only encourages more of the same as well as decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio. See "Responding to Tone" below.

> We very much value differing viewpoints. Feel free to disagree with someone all you want. Just do so civilly.

> Take a look at Graham's "hierarchy of disagreement": if you want an idea of what I consider actionable. In my ideal world, when people disagree, their posts would be at least "contradiction" and ideally "counterargument" and above. I'll start to create a mental list of people skating close to the edge when I see posts at "Responding to Tone". Anything below that earns a censure (not censor since I can't alter or delete existing posts, only the SI admins have that power) as soon as I see it, with or without warning.

You can see the SI Terms Of Use (TOU) at and it's apparent that the admins interpret these rather broadly. They give the usual sophistries people engage in when trying to skate close to the edge short shrift. My personal summary of the TOU is "play nice, be adult". SIAdmin (Dave) and SI Spam Patrol (Cheeky Kid) are our friends <G>. Here is a wonderful example of how this works... 8320. Note SI Dave's response was there prior to any other poster posting. Don't waste your time....

Again, welcome! I think you'll find this a fine place to learn about and contribute to others' understanding of IMMU and its prospects.

Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
29890Iam still sticking with my Monday prediction for a deal. Why not. It's as gotommsel11yesterday
29889I have talked to the company twice in the last week and have asked many questionrodneyh07-yesterday
29888Letting these guys go at it alone is crazy. How long do you think Doc is going ttommsel13yesterday
29887Idaho, I am on record that if the binary is positive 132 is probably worth keepigary123-yesterday
29886Optimism it is. Endorphins are still kicked in from this mornings Brick. A Brickdorightbythem-yesterday
29885I think w get an ADC deal Monday at the open . How that for optimism.tommsel1-yesterday
29884I don't know if you are up for more reading about preclinical items. Post #2dorightbythem-yesterday
29883And lets not forget, it's not the only one they want to partner immunomedicsogwap1-yesterday
29882More that fortunate, also intelligent.EMU2-last Friday
29881Yep, that's what my guy who's close to the line that can't be crosseEMU2-last Friday
29880I stand by my statements Gary (and I was talking running phase lll trials), it widahoranch1-last Friday
29879Not true, mgmt was in negotiations for cliv for all of 2013, ( reread All of 201gary123-last Friday
29878Im rooting for you.ladyPI-last Friday
29877I guess we will just wait and see. I hope you are right but my confidence levelladyPI-last Friday
29876There is really no evidence that the company wants to go it alone with anything idahoranch1-last Friday
29875I think they will get a deal, I really don't think they want or plan to go iidahoranch12last Friday
29874I agree with your post. My biggest fear is that they will go it alone with the ladyPI-last Friday
29873I believe that Doc wants a deal for 132. But I am sure Doc feels that 132 has emokelumne river11last Friday
29872Here is my personal "barley" motivation: [graphic]jargonweary2last Friday
29871Yup I agree with your analogy. They are old old old school. They barley have anytommsel1-last Friday
29870I see a lot of posts hoping for a deal prior to the lupus readout. Knowing whatallatwwk1last Friday
29869Company presentation updated, includes some IMMU-132 numbers. dorightbythem-last Friday
29868Li I know we are conditioned to think that way(rightfully so) and I suppose thawilly61-last Friday
2986720K Shares in 35 Minutes of Trading. YAWNgonnahappensoon-last Friday
29866I agree with you Li. I hope I am wrong to. Oh well. No pain no gain. Oh wait thitommsel1-last Friday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2015 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.