Biotech / Medical
Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
34839 189 1 IMMU
Emcee:  erickerickson Type:  Moderated
Welcome to the moderated Silicon Investor message board for Immunomedics (IMMU). After watching several other forums degenerate, I decided to start this forum for anyone who values reasonable discussion. I've made it a moderated board so I have some control over whether it stays civil or not...

Please observe the following courtesies:

> No personal attacks. This includes attributing motives to posters. You know, "you are a pumper", or "you must be short", or..... Such accusations are unprovable in the first place and in the second place contribute nothing to the discussion.

> Please refrain from posts about posts. If you see a post you find obnoxious or that you think violates the TOU, just report a TOU violation to the SI admins by clicking the link near the bottom. The SI admins have been doing a great job of removing all traces of posters who violate the spirit of SI TOU (see below). Responding only encourages more of the same as well as decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio. See "Responding to Tone" below.

> We very much value differing viewpoints. Feel free to disagree with someone all you want. Just do so civilly.

> Take a look at Graham's "hierarchy of disagreement": if you want an idea of what I consider actionable. In my ideal world, when people disagree, their posts would be at least "contradiction" and ideally "counterargument" and above. I'll start to create a mental list of people skating close to the edge when I see posts at "Responding to Tone". Anything below that earns a censure (not censor since I can't alter or delete existing posts, only the SI admins have that power) as soon as I see it, with or without warning.

You can see the SI Terms Of Use (TOU) at and it's apparent that the admins interpret these rather broadly. They give the usual sophistries people engage in when trying to skate close to the edge short shrift. My personal summary of the TOU is "play nice, be adult". SIAdmin (Dave) and SI Spam Patrol (Cheeky Kid) are our friends <G>. Here is a wonderful example of how this works... 8320. Note SI Dave's response was there prior to any other poster posting. Don't waste your time....

Again, welcome! I think you'll find this a fine place to learn about and contribute to others' understanding of IMMU and its prospects.

Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
34839AF's take was intriguing, I knew Janet Woodcock has been supportive to the pidahoranch1-4 hours ago
34838Lady...Although I believe there is a high likelihood of FDA approval next month,gaduntz7315 hours ago
34837thats what I meant . . .and as with provenge, there has been and will be a lot oladyPI-6 hours ago
34836Boy, you are right gaduntz, I was winging it with the days, had a lot to do todaidahoranch1-8 hours ago
34835Lady....there is not going to be another hearing in May. May 26 is the pdufa dagaduntz73-yesterday're showing symptoms.... the SRPT briefing docs came out thursgaduntz73-yesterday
34833Here's a # 4, which should be #1. Don't buy if you cannot afford to losesogwap1-yesterday
34832I like the way you think, an even 1 million dollars sounds good. No wait ! I measogwap1-yesterday
34831The billion dollar question about investing in biotech is, do you buy left for dgary123-yesterday
34830when he told me yesterday I looked into it and BOUGHT yesterday- so I am thankfuladyPI-yesterday
34829402,200 shares print at $3.68 3rd largest print of the year...the 2 larger prigissa_gamma-yesterday
34828AstraZeneca Beefs Up Immuno-Oncology Pipeline with TapImmune Technology Pricindorightbythem4yesterday
34827Obviously, we should not be following you in any trades!! Please post here befokdd9991yesterday
34826I had disclosed that I had bought some SRPT, I had 3k shares and a couple of monidahoranch11yesterday
34825When you say "giddiness" I don't think you are referring to those idahoranch11yesterday
34824You mean pricing options?idahoranch1-yesterday
34823Probably a story planted by Miss Cindy as a way of managing shareholder expectatFitzhughlaw-yesterday
34822I think a poorly written computer program writes these things. From: istreetwirerickerickson-yesterday
34821Don't know if you meant today, or a week from today when they conduct a confFitzhughlaw-yesterday
34820I thought running this blog IS your day job! Fitzhughlaw-yesterday
34819I know you do to, but i really hope you are wrong...:). I cant see how you couldrodneyh07-yesterday
34818Dunno, but here's a tip (and thanks to Idaho for bringing this up). The gidli3511-Wednesday
34817If I could answer that question correctly 51% of the time, I wouldn't bothererickerickson1Wednesday
34816What do we think happens to PPS on Thursday?Kardiac Kid-Wednesday
34815I'll be pleased if the bond holders have covered and the 19 million share shidahoranch17Wednesday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2016 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.