Biotech / Medical
Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
38789 211 1 IMMU
Emcee:  erickerickson Type:  Moderated
Welcome to the moderated Silicon Investor message board for Immunomedics (IMMU). After watching several other forums degenerate, I decided to start this forum for anyone who values reasonable discussion. I've made it a moderated board so I have some control over whether it stays civil or not...

Please observe the following courtesies:

> No personal attacks. This includes attributing motives to posters. You know, "you are a pumper", or "you must be short", or..... Such accusations are unprovable in the first place and in the second place contribute nothing to the discussion.

> Please refrain from posts about posts. If you see a post you find obnoxious or that you think violates the TOU, just report a TOU violation to the SI admins by clicking the link near the bottom. The SI admins have been doing a great job of removing all traces of posters who violate the spirit of SI TOU (see below). Responding only encourages more of the same as well as decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio. See "Responding to Tone" below.

> We very much value differing viewpoints. Feel free to disagree with someone all you want. Just do so civilly.

> Take a look at Graham's "hierarchy of disagreement": Hierarchy if you want an idea of what I consider actionable. In my ideal world, when people disagree, their posts would be at least "contradiction" and ideally "counterargument" and above. I'll start to create a mental list of people skating close to the edge when I see posts at "Responding to Tone". Anything below that earns a censure (not censor since I can't alter or delete existing posts, only the SI admins have that power) as soon as I see it, with or without warning.

You can see the SI Terms Of Use (TOU) at and it's apparent that the admins interpret these rather broadly. They give the usual sophistries people engage in when trying to skate close to the edge short shrift. My personal summary of the TOU is "play nice, be adult". SIAdmin (Dave) and SI Spam Patrol (Cheeky Kid) are our friends <G>. Here is a wonderful example of how this works... 8320. Note SI Dave's response was there prior to any other poster posting. Don't waste your time....

Again, welcome! I think you'll find this a fine place to learn about and contribute to others' understanding of IMMU and its prospects.

Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
38789I voted for VB, being stuck in a boring job at JFK, my mind wanders uncontrollabgary123-34 minutes ago
38788I don't see the threat of a shareholder lawsuit being a deterrent to G doingstockdoc77-34 minutes ago
38787They were supposed to be publishing TNBC data in a cancer journal. I'm surpstockdoc77-40 minutes ago
38786Most shareholders dont bother voting. If you dont like management most people sstockdoc77-43 minutes ago
38785This isn't the first time you've proffered this scenario, I think it'EMU2-an hour ago
38784This what VB and those voting for their proposed board fears the most. This is wEMU2-an hour ago
38783I care. t wasn't me.EMU2-an hour ago
38782and any attempt to do a last minute bottom of barrel deal will most certainly rekdd999-an hour ago
38781I believe Greenhill probably beat on G for weeks to get him to change the board kdd999-an hour ago
38780> What happens if a share holder doesn't vote at all? If a shareholder tli3511-3 hours ago
38779Whether by coincidence or planned, Greenhill is also a specialist in defeating sgary123-3 hours ago
38778<<And from Goldenberg's point of view his strategy has worked quite weplhky346525 hours ago
38777What happens if a share holder doesn't vote at all? I remember Li mentioned Timmu-5 hours ago
38776And from Goldenberg's point of view his strategy has worked quite well. It jargonweary96 hours ago
38775How about we look on the BRIGHT SIDE and plan for a BEST CASE SCENARIO: 132 curCelebrityEquity-6 hours ago
38774Doc allowed IMMU to become a public company to put money in his coffers and pockEMU2-7 hours ago
38773<<And one more thing. When Cindy says, "we would never put you on theplhky3465-9 hours ago
38772oh contraire my friend...I don't think she was being smug at all. She was sisukit-11 AM
38771Well, Cindy saying "there is no way we would put you on the board" is jargonweary210 AM
38770 I think Idaho would do an amazing job. However. I believe that would be a senteduwhee-10 AM
38769Thanks Jargon, but there are others who would bring more to the "expertise&idahoranch179 AM
38768Idaho and others have been spot-on about resistance around $3.75, but I feel theghettogoulash-2 AM
38767Breaking my self-imposed silence on this board of more than a year, let me just jargonweary2yesterday
38766I agree, why not put the 7 you would like to see on there, and it really should idahoranch1-yesterday
38765By the way, if venBio wants a psych move, they can update their proxy solicitatili35113yesterday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2017 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.