SI
SI
discoversearch

Biotech / Medical
Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
27298 145 0 IMMU
Emcee:  erickerickson Type:  Moderated
Welcome to the moderated Silicon Investor message board for Immunomedics (IMMU). After watching several other forums degenerate, I decided to start this forum for anyone who values reasonable discussion. I've made it a moderated board so I have some control over whether it stays civil or not...

Please observe the following courtesies:

> No personal attacks. This includes attributing motives to posters. You know, "you are a pumper", or "you must be short", or..... Such accusations are unprovable in the first place and in the second place contribute nothing to the discussion.

> Please refrain from posts about posts. If you see a post you find obnoxious or that you think violates the TOU, just report a TOU violation to the SI admins by clicking the link near the bottom. The SI admins have been doing a great job of removing all traces of posters who violate the spirit of SI TOU (see below). Responding only encourages more of the same as well as decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio. See "Responding to Tone" below.

> We very much value differing viewpoints. Feel free to disagree with someone all you want. Just do so civilly.

> Take a look at Graham's "hierarchy of disagreement": en.wikipedia.org if you want an idea of what I consider actionable. In my ideal world, when people disagree, their posts would be at least "contradiction" and ideally "counterargument" and above. I'll start to create a mental list of people skating close to the edge when I see posts at "Responding to Tone". Anything below that earns a censure (not censor since I can't alter or delete existing posts, only the SI admins have that power) as soon as I see it, with or without warning.

You can see the SI Terms Of Use (TOU) at siliconinvestor.com and it's apparent that the admins interpret these rather broadly. They give the usual sophistries people engage in when trying to skate close to the edge short shrift. My personal summary of the TOU is "play nice, be adult". SIAdmin (Dave) and SI Spam Patrol (Cheeky Kid) are our friends <G>. Here is a wonderful example of how this works... 8320. Note SI Dave's response was there prior to any other poster posting. Don't waste your time....

Again, welcome! I think you'll find this a fine place to learn about and contribute to others' understanding of IMMU and its prospects.

Erick
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
27298> its not clear why that combination would take IMMU for $8 target to a $4 tali3511-14 minutes ago
27297Otter I assume I am one of those negativos but its ok to be negative when it wwilly6118 hours ago
27296thanks for clarifying that willy61. Yes, the delay in e-mab data presentation hallatwwk11 PM
27295That's good news as she thinks IMMU has upside...unlike some of the negativome otter-12 PM
27294Willy - I'd like nothing more than a trade to $4-5, but I'm having a haIMMULong-12 PM
27293They simply mean from first qtr to first half of 2015. Either they didn't knwilly61-12 PM
27292Willy, if the street paid any attention, the last 10Q stated that the expected bidahoranch1-12 PM
27291willy61 -- any idea what Lafferty means by "change in lupus readout"? allatwwk-12 PM
27290stockdoc, and li, This is what I have said just after the CC, a Phase III in tngary123-11 AM
27289Tom I have given a pretty healthy downside range to 2.8 but given all the horribwilly61-11 AM
27288I left out the word "proposal" - didn't read before I sent. I kneladyPI-11 AM
27287Are you sure thus is a buy at these levels? This is a tricky situation. If they tommsel1-11 AM
27286FYI Lafferty downgrades to 4 from 8 today citing cash , possible money raise anwilly61-11 AM
27285Moke In my humble opinion it is a look into the mind of a man who believes his willy61-10 AM
27284Idaho missed a beat: For settlement date 8/15/2014, short interest was 12,115,2li3511-9 AM
27283I am completely convinced this management will be the cancer that takes the comptommsel119 AM
27282> not abused its shareholders or the investment community The "take homli351118 AM
27281Similar to Li's exposition on MacroGenics (see message 23388), note this artFitzhughlaw-7 AM
27280From what conference/publication are you getting these data?li3511-7 AM
27279The data in triple neg breast CA is very good. Out of 16 patients to have 4 parstockdoc778yesterday
27278Willy, you are blowing that exchange way out of proportion. Here is Goldenbergmokelumne river2yesterday
27277Below is the Seeking Alpha transcript discussion on 132 with some new data sincemokelumne river2yesterday
27276Duwhee It wasn't that he found it to dumb to answer. I will try and find twilly61-yesterday
27275Li I have wondered that buyout potential for many years to be honest with you. willy61-yesterday
27274> The best hope for immu in the next 120 days ... > BEST CASE Monster ADCdli35112yesterday
27273Re: the arbitration Apparently both Takeda/Nycomed and Immunomedics are seekingli3511-yesterday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2014 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.