Biotech / Medical
Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
32637 173 1 IMMU
Emcee:  erickerickson Type:  Moderated
Welcome to the moderated Silicon Investor message board for Immunomedics (IMMU). After watching several other forums degenerate, I decided to start this forum for anyone who values reasonable discussion. I've made it a moderated board so I have some control over whether it stays civil or not...

Please observe the following courtesies:

> No personal attacks. This includes attributing motives to posters. You know, "you are a pumper", or "you must be short", or..... Such accusations are unprovable in the first place and in the second place contribute nothing to the discussion.

> Please refrain from posts about posts. If you see a post you find obnoxious or that you think violates the TOU, just report a TOU violation to the SI admins by clicking the link near the bottom. The SI admins have been doing a great job of removing all traces of posters who violate the spirit of SI TOU (see below). Responding only encourages more of the same as well as decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio. See "Responding to Tone" below.

> We very much value differing viewpoints. Feel free to disagree with someone all you want. Just do so civilly.

> Take a look at Graham's "hierarchy of disagreement": if you want an idea of what I consider actionable. In my ideal world, when people disagree, their posts would be at least "contradiction" and ideally "counterargument" and above. I'll start to create a mental list of people skating close to the edge when I see posts at "Responding to Tone". Anything below that earns a censure (not censor since I can't alter or delete existing posts, only the SI admins have that power) as soon as I see it, with or without warning.

You can see the SI Terms Of Use (TOU) at and it's apparent that the admins interpret these rather broadly. They give the usual sophistries people engage in when trying to skate close to the edge short shrift. My personal summary of the TOU is "play nice, be adult". SIAdmin (Dave) and SI Spam Patrol (Cheeky Kid) are our friends <G>. Here is a wonderful example of how this works... 8320. Note SI Dave's response was there prior to any other poster posting. Don't waste your time....

Again, welcome! I think you'll find this a fine place to learn about and contribute to others' understanding of IMMU and its prospects.

Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
32637The trials done with chemo for metastatic breast cancer were done in all comers,stockdoc77-33 minutes ago
32636our esteemed board member Markison is an executive at Avista who tried to make tladyPI-41 minutes ago
32635> Survival Outcomes for Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Canceli3511-an hour ago
32634We need a big pharma partner to validate it, for now we are way under the radar.stockdoc77-3 hours ago
32633 Lannett to acquire UCB's Kremers Urban unit Published: Sept 2, 2015 6:41 psummer_sky-4 hours ago
32632And if the bell curve holds we are trajecting towards 9-12 mts, I really cannotgary123-4 hours ago
32631Clinical Breast Cancer Survival Outcomes for Patients With Metastatic Triplestockdoc7778 hours ago
32630More ADCs fiercebiotech.comsysiphus-9 hours ago
32629I am surprised you are not discussing the potential for the outright sale of theEagleRare11 PM
32628"It's hard to tell whether or not the current level of effort is sufficFitzhughlaw-11 AM
32627> Li pointed out, it's a trial being run for "bragging rights" li3511-11 AM
32626As pointed out by you in a prior post, the BOD has nothing to fear and nothing tladyPI-10 AM
32625Sounds lovely - all of it :)ladyPI-9 AM
32624Right with you Weather, especially on hPam4/Cmab; as Li pointed out, it's a Fitzhughlaw-8 AM
32623I'm totally in agreement with the step incentive approach, Fitz. I think a weatherproof98 AM
32622I live in Central Coast California They say we may get a wet winter, so I am getduwhee1yesterday
32621Weather, to close one loop, the deal described by Dr. Tom would certainly be matFitzhughlaw1yesterday
32620I'm not sure why IMMU would sign a deal like that. IMMU is taking all the riallatwwk-yesterday
32619drtom's original question was, "If Immunomedics has been in talks with weatherproof-yesterday
32618The 8K form states that: "(b) For purposes of this Item 1.01, a material deFitzhughlaw2yesterday
32617Instructions from Form 8-K: " For purposes of this Item 1.01, a material dli3511-yesterday
32616"An agreement may be "definitive" for the purposes of this rule, weatherproof-yesterday
32615> would they be considered material before the "if" of the "ifli35112yesterday
32614If Immunomedics has been in talks with a major pharma company regarding 132, anddrtom12341yesterday
32613where do you live that you are splitting firewood? I want to be there! I looladyPI-yesterday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2015 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.