SI
SI
discoversearch

Biotech / Medical
Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
36486 195 1 IMMU
Emcee:  erickerickson Type:  Moderated
Welcome to the moderated Silicon Investor message board for Immunomedics (IMMU). After watching several other forums degenerate, I decided to start this forum for anyone who values reasonable discussion. I've made it a moderated board so I have some control over whether it stays civil or not...

Please observe the following courtesies:

> No personal attacks. This includes attributing motives to posters. You know, "you are a pumper", or "you must be short", or..... Such accusations are unprovable in the first place and in the second place contribute nothing to the discussion.

> Please refrain from posts about posts. If you see a post you find obnoxious or that you think violates the TOU, just report a TOU violation to the SI admins by clicking the link near the bottom. The SI admins have been doing a great job of removing all traces of posters who violate the spirit of SI TOU (see below). Responding only encourages more of the same as well as decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio. See "Responding to Tone" below.

> We very much value differing viewpoints. Feel free to disagree with someone all you want. Just do so civilly.

> Take a look at Graham's "hierarchy of disagreement": en.wikipedia.org if you want an idea of what I consider actionable. In my ideal world, when people disagree, their posts would be at least "contradiction" and ideally "counterargument" and above. I'll start to create a mental list of people skating close to the edge when I see posts at "Responding to Tone". Anything below that earns a censure (not censor since I can't alter or delete existing posts, only the SI admins have that power) as soon as I see it, with or without warning.

You can see the SI Terms Of Use (TOU) at siliconinvestor.com and it's apparent that the admins interpret these rather broadly. They give the usual sophistries people engage in when trying to skate close to the edge short shrift. My personal summary of the TOU is "play nice, be adult". SIAdmin (Dave) and SI Spam Patrol (Cheeky Kid) are our friends <G>. Here is a wonderful example of how this works... 8320. Note SI Dave's response was there prior to any other poster posting. Don't waste your time....

Again, welcome! I think you'll find this a fine place to learn about and contribute to others' understanding of IMMU and its prospects.

Erick
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
36486Gary you seem to be a pretty shallow fellow. I have one word if advise. Get a litommsel1-an hour ago
36485Oh, it has a lot to do with holding Immu, just gotta decipher it.gary123-2 hours ago
36484It was a setup. The guy bet someone he'd leave with her. So when his nieceallatwwk-5 hours ago
36483If your topic is not IMMU mark it OT. Who gives a s#it about your love life failwatchmymovement26 hours ago
36482This world is full of irrational people, a snow storm is approaching and they gogary123-6 hours ago
36481I will try to interject and be heard over the din created by the plethora of optFitzhughlaw39 hours ago
36480Anyone have any reason to believe we get a deal done anytime soon?plhky3465-9 AM
36479 those straws creeped me out. I'll have nightmares over them... which is anduwhee-yesterday
36478It doesn't matter, because Goldenberg and Sullivan are morons; and as Li saiFitzhughlaw2yesterday
36477I know, wondering which other emerging platform drug technology showing promisegary123-yesterday
36476Aaaaagh. That's a AF column. Gee, do you suppose he suggested they considekdd999-yesterday
36475 fiercebiotech.com The Big Biotech has long said it's open to deals large gary123-yesterday
36474Perhaps they figured that by the time this conference rolls around that IMMU wousogwap1-yesterday
36473Li- I provided the address: Check the attached. Message 30675981summer_sky-Tuesday
36472(Edited later: Never mind.)li3511-Tuesday
36471Thanks for getting to the bottom of that, gaduntz.weatherproof1Tuesday
36470My error. I went to the 2016 site and did a search for Immunomedics, to see if wFitzhughlaw-Tuesday
36469Fitszs link 11.35 Solid Tumor Therapy with Sacituzumab Govitecan, an Anti-TROP2gaduntz73-Tuesday
36468I'm getting all kinds of confused! I was referring to the upcoming ADC-Worlweatherproof-Tuesday
36467guys...the page on which the charts appear from the link that summer supplied sagaduntz73-Tuesday
36466Nothing, except you also forgot to point out that BTD being granted is also not Fitzhughlaw-Tuesday
36465Ah, under the "Physicians" link. Thanks for pointing that out; that seFitzhughlaw1Tuesday
36464Yep, someone did boo boo, Cliv is still in p2. Fumbling continuesgary123-Tuesday
36463I guess to compensate for presenting data prematurely, violating ASCO rules, Dr weatherproof-Tuesday
36462Fritz, Here's the website address: immunomedics.comsummer_sky-Tuesday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2016 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.