Technology Stocks: Blank Check IPOs (SPACS)  
Posts: 2522 | Member SubjectMarks: 82 | No Bans

Share This Board Moderated By: Glenn Petersen -- (Moderated) -- Started: 1/7/2005 11:27:34 PM  Revision History


Wall Street has never been bashful about recycling old products and concepts. One of the recent concepts to be recycled is the blank check IPO. Blank check companies are also known as Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACS).

As of December 11, 2009, 162 SPACS have gone public since August of 2003, raising gross proceeds totaling $22,003,690,655 (give or take a buck or two). Another 67 companies currently have registration statements on file with the SEC and are looking to raise $10,787,120,608 (once again, give or take a buck or two). If you back out the companies that filed their initial registration statements on or before December 31, 2007, there are 27 companies currently in registration that are looking to raise $3,899,000,000. Another 33 companies have filed and withdrawn registration statements; two of these companies subsequently went public on London’s AIM stock exchange, where they raised gross proceeds totaling $381 million. The companies that withdrew their registration statements were looking to raise $6,401,000,000

87 companies have actually completed acquisitions, and another 11 have deals pending. Of the companies that have completed transactions, seven have either been acquired or are in the process of being acquired. There are 59 companies that have failed to close on their proposed acquisitions and have either liquidated or are currently in the process of liquidating. These companies raised a total of $7,050,111,754 in their offerings. The shareholders of ten of these liquidated companies have extended the corporate charters for nine of companies so that they could operate as a shell. One of these companies has actually closed on a transaction.

There are 5 SPACS still looking for deals.

There have been several high profile transactions. The first was the acquisition of Jamba Juice Company by Services Acquisition Corporation International. Freedom Acquisition Holdings subsequently acquired GLG Partners and Endeavor Acquisition acquired American Apparel.

The first of the new crop of blank check companies went public on August 23, 2003.


Of the 80 companies that have completed transactions and have not yet been acquired, the securities of only 24 of these companies are trading above their original offering price and 56 are trading below. The average company is down 15.53% versus an average decline of 5.15% for the NASDAQ Composite. The 7 companies that have either been acquired or are in the process of being acquired are down on average 75.31% versus an average increase of 17.81% for the NASDAQ Composite.

Of the 11 companies that have open deals, the securities of 10 of these companies are trading at or above their original offering price and 1 is trading below. The average company with an open transaction is up 4.72% versus an average decrease of 5.97% for the NASDAQ Composite. The securities of the six companies still looking for a transaction are up 2.20% since their original offerings versus an average decrease of 7.01% for the NASDAQ Composite.

A note on methodology: When calculating the return percentages for each of the companies, I have added the current market value of the applicable common shares and warrants, subtracted the unit cost, and divided the resulting sum by the original unit cost. In those instances where companies have redeemed their warrants, for the warrant value I have used the value that was created through the exercise of the warrant. For example, in December 2007, HLS Systems International (originally Chardan China North Acquisition) redeemed its warrants. The common stock of HLS last traded at $11.97. If you assume that $6.97 of value has been created from each of the two warrants (which had a strike price of $5.00 per share), the original units, which were priced at $6.00 and are no longer trading, now have a value of $25.91 ($11.97 + $6.97 + $6.97). The computation for calculating the return on HLS: $11.97 + $6.97M+ $6.97 - $6.00 = ($19.91) divided by $6.00 yields a return of 331.83%.

I realize that the second calculation does not include the cost of exercising the warrants. If we add the exercise cost of the two warrants ($10.00) to the original cost of the unit ($6.00), our basis is $16.00. We now own three shares with a total value of $15.60. As an alternative, we could compute the return as follows: $35.91 - $16.00 = $19.91. $19.91 divided by $16.00 yields a negative return of 122.44%.

I am open to suggestions.

When calculating the returns on the NASDAQ Composite, I used the closing index price on the date prior to each of the individual offerings.

A blank check company is a development stage company that has been formed for no specific purpose other than to complete a merger or acquisition with an operating entity, the identity of which is unknown when the company is formed. Because such transactions generally, but not always, trigger a change of control, with the shareholders of the acquired company now owning more than 50% of the combined entities, the majority of these transactions are accounted for as reverse mergers.

Blank check IPOs had a run of popularity during the 1980s. However, the abuses of that period, particularly the promotional activities of insiders looking to make a fast buck through the promotion of their stock rather than the acquisition of a viable business, led the SEC to place some significant restrictions on the practice.

The SEC has discouraged blank check IPOs with Rule 419, which regulates the issuance of “penny stock”, defined as shares priced below $5, by companies that are in the development stage. Rule 419 pertains to all companies with assets of less than $5 million. Because all of the recent offerings have been priced over $5 per unit and have each raised a minimum of $9 million in gross proceeds; the offerings have been exempt from the provisions of Rule 419.

The newly public blank check companies have been sensitive to the failures of their predecessors. To alleviate the concerns of potential investors, all of the recent offerings have voluntarily complied with most of the provisions of Rule 419 and the companies have been careful to structure the transactions so that the founders will not be in a position to enrich themselves at the expense of their new public shareholders.

Most of the funds raised in a blank check IPO are placed in a trust account and can only be released in the event that the company completes a business combination that wins approval from a majority of the company’s public shareholders. Depending on the individual company, a proposed transaction can be blocked if 20% to 40% of the non-insider shares are voted against the transaction. Regardless of the outcome of the vote on the proposed acquisition, dissenting shareholders have the option of having their shares redeemed in an amount that is equal to their pro rata share of the funds held in the trust account. If a transaction is not completed within a specified period that can range from eighteen to thirty months, the company will be liquidated with the proceeds distributed to the public shareholders. The insiders will not receive any of the proceeds.

All of these offerings have been artfully priced. Many of the early deals have been priced at $6 per unit, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and warrants to purchase two additional shares of common stock at $5 per share.

Subsequent to the IPOs, the common shares have generally traded at a slight discount to their liquidation value. When investing in these securities, the conservative play is to invest in the common shares, which are generally trading at or near their liquidation value. The worst-case scenario: You get your money back. The more speculative route would be to buy the warrants.

I would encourage everyone to do some due diligence before purchasing any of these securities. They are speculative. Deals do crater before they are approved and there have been a lot of bad acquisitions. If you do purchase any of these securities, please do not allocate a significant portion of your investment portfolio. It might also be advisable to buy a basket of securities, rather than focusing on one company.

At the very least, the following risk factors should be taken into consideration:

-- Many reverse mergers fail. Companies that go public via this route generally do so because they would be unable to complete a traditional IPO. However, the magnitude of the dollars currently being raised in these offerings should mean that the newly public companies might be in a position to attract some decent acquisition candidates.

-- An investment in a blank check company is ultimately a bet that the management of the company will have the expertise to identify and close on the acquisition of a quality private entity. The last year has seen a significant upgrading in the management groups taking these companies public.

-- These securities are often very thinly traded. You are at the mercy of the market makers. Be very careful if you place an order.

Summary statistics – December 11, 2009

Message 26188546

Profiles of closed deals – December 11, 2009

Message 26188571

Summary information for companies with closed deals – December 11, 2009

Message 26188578

Profiles: Companies or assets of acquired – December 11, 2009

Message 26188581

Summary information for companies acquired – December 11, 2009

Message 26188585

Profiles of open deals – December 11, 2009

Message 26188589

Summary information for companies with open deals – December 11, 2009

Message 26188591

Summary information for companies without deals – December 11, 2009

Message 26188595

Summary information for companies still in registration – December 11, 2009

Message 26188600

Profiles of liquidated companies (terminated registrations) – December 11, 2009

Message 26188605

Summary information for liquidated companies (terminated registrations) – December 11, 2009

Message 26188606

Profiles of liquidated companies that will continue their existence as shells – December 11, 2009

Message 26188610

Summary information for liquidated companies that will continue their existence as shells – December 11, 2009

Message 26188616

Summary information for companies that have withdrawn their U.S. registration statements – December 11, 2009

Message 26188621

Additional resources:

Reverse Merger and SPAC Blog (David Feldman) 

The SPAC Report 

Wikipedia (Special Purpose Acquisition Company) 
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsDate
2522Collapse of the Cupcake Fad Sends Crumbs Into Supermarkets By Venessa Wong BlGlenn Petersen-04/15/2014 09:05 AM
2521American Apparel is on the rocks: American Apparel approaches Skadden for restrGlenn Petersen-02/20/2014 04:33 PM
2520Another one-for-five reverse split for Freeseas: InPlay 6:03AM Freeseas announcGlenn Petersen-12/02/2013 04:39 PM
2519Bose got its start as Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. Packaging Corp. buying Boise Glenn Petersen-09/16/2013 09:44 AM
2518Jamba Juice completed a one-for-five reverse split in early June. Glenn Petersen109/03/2013 10:45 AM
2517Exceed Company Ltd. Announces Receipt of Non-binding Going Private Proposal4 PrGlenn Petersen-08/20/2013 09:58 AM
2516Amazing story, thanks for sharing. RockyBalboa-06/04/2013 06:06 PM
2515In the early 60's my parents invested in a local Chicago company named Tel-AGlenn Petersen-04/24/2013 02:05 PM
2514Azteca Acquisition Corp. (stock symbol: AZTA) InterMedia Partners to Merge itsGlenn Petersen-01/23/2013 09:22 PM
2513RMG Networks and SCG Financial Acquisition Corp. Announce Agreement for BusinessGlenn Petersen-01/18/2013 01:23 PM
2512WestWay (stock symbol: WWAY) is being acquired: EQT Infrastructure II to AcquirGlenn Petersen-01/03/2013 07:24 PM
2511Hmm, DAKT? RockyBalboa-12/27/2012 05:51 PM
2510I am not a fan of DOOH. Some background:  Glenn Petersen-12/22/2012 01:21 PM
2509A bit of background on RMG Networks and Symon Communications: Hey, big spenderGlenn Petersen-12/22/2012 01:12 PM
2508SCG Financial Acquisition Corp. has signed a second non-binding letter of intentGlenn Petersen-12/22/2012 01:06 PM
2507While the company did not issue a press release, SCGQ Financial Acquisition CorpGlenn Petersen-12/22/2012 12:56 PM
2506Just reading about Chinacasts (CAST) shenanigans. The stock is now at about $.1RockyBalboa-12/21/2012 04:40 PM
2505Empeiria Acquisition Corp. (stock symbol: EPAQ) has closed on its merger with InGlenn Petersen-12/21/2012 12:25 PM
2504pot-dispensing vending machines The new gold rush. I remember reading about thiGlenn Petersen-12/18/2012 10:16 AM
2503And then there´s Medbox and its soon to be provider, AVTC (autoretail). ScaRockyBalboa-12/13/2012 11:52 AM
2502And nobody went to jail. S.E.C. Charges the Chinese Affiliates of 5 Big AccounGlenn Petersen-12/03/2012 05:26 PM
2501Time for a change (in general, perhaps not for Great Wall): RockyBalboa111/28/2012 07:24 PM
2500Prime Acquisition Corp. (stock symbol: PACQ) has terminated an acquisition agreeGlenn Petersen-11/23/2012 07:25 PM
2499Global Eagle Acquisition inks a deal: Ex-Hollywood execs to buy in-flight busiGlenn Petersen-11/16/2012 10:33 AM
2498China Growth Equity Investment Ltd. (stock symbol: CGEI) has entered into a defiGlenn Petersen-10/25/2012 02:08 PM
2497EPAC has simultaneously announced a tender offer for 5,520,000 shares: EmpeiriGlenn Petersen-10/22/2012 11:48 AM
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2014 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.