SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Non-Tech: J P Morgan Chase
Posts: 40 | Member SubjectMarks: 9 | No Bans

Add SubjectMark | Hide Original Post | Show Chart | Poster Summary | Share This Board

Moderated By: David C. Burns -- (Not Moderated) -- Started: 1/27/2004 5:35:33 AM  Revision History

Dimon reflected on the legendary series of acquisitions he'd made as Sandy Weill's right-hand man while the two of them had built Citigroup. They had paid little or no premium for most of their acquisitions, including the final one: Travelers' purchase of Citigroup. "It's true that when you have a low-premium deal, you have a better platform to build value, because you can build the business instead of slashing and burning simply to save enough to pay for the premium," Dimon says. (To be sure, he and Harrison plan to cut J.P. Morgan's workforce by 7% over three years.) And in the end Dimon concluded that the potential long-term returns from a J.P. Morgan/Bank One combination would more than compensate for a low deal premium.

... In the days and weeks after Dimon and Harrison announced the $58 billion merger, the deal has been widely lauded. Analysts agree that the combined bank will be big and strong in a panoply of businesses in which one side or the other was undersized or weak. "Their strengths and weaknesses match up almost perfectly," says Thomas Brown, an independent analyst with Bankstocks.com. And the market weighed in with a positive assessment: Contrary to Harrison's fears, J.P. Morgan's stock has actually risen 2% since the announcement.

But the main reason the deal is getting kudos is that it brings Jamie Dimon back where he belongs, to the big stage. He's returning from the wilderness of regional banking to face the biggest challenge of his career: running an immense, complicated new creation, the hybrid of a giant investment and commercial bank. It's a role Dimon was born to play—and one in which he has no doubts that he'll succeed. "In the long term we'll enrich shareholders a lot more because I didn't get a big premium," he brags. "Okay, so maybe Bank One lost out on $8 billion or so, but we'll take J.P. Morgan's stock to $100 in five years. That will add over $200 billion in market value!"

--- JAMIE DIMON, The Dealmaker and the Dynamo
By Shawn Tully
FORTUNE magazine
January 2004

Well, let's watch him do it.
Previous 10 | Next 10 | View Recent | Post Message Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsDate
40After the laughter, who quizzes Dimon? Jamie Dimon is richer than the presidentDavid C. Burns-03/22/2013 05:16 AM
39Agree banking should be boring. B. drtrading-06/02/2012 04:29 PM
38Big Banks Special Deal with the Devil a rather satirical piece about Jamie Diamorichieb-05/12/2012 11:38 PM
37Jamie belongs in JAIL for stealing. NO negotiating NO posturing NO NO NO - just mtclark-11/06/2011 01:43 PM
36Fairly good article in the Economist on JPM this week: economist.com  Eliot Stock-07/16/2011 04:52 AM
35Taken to Task: Jamie Dimon’s House of Ill Repute finance.yahoo.com  JakeStraw-07/12/2011 03:50 PM
34An Open letter to JPMorgan Chase Board of Directors gsb.stanford.edu  David C. Burns-06/21/2011 04:17 AM
33The Big Banks Fight On By SIMON JOHNSON Today's Economist The New York TimesDavid C. Burns-06/21/2011 04:17 AM
32From the customer's viewpoint they are the bogey man. Within another 18 monMJ103/01/2011 02:49 AM
31Washington Mutual pledged free checking for life. JPM is not keeping that commiscaram(o)uche112/18/2010 02:19 PM
30Jamie Dimon: America's Least-Hated Banker By ROGER LOWENSTEIN The New York David C. Burns-12/05/2010 06:06 PM
Previous 10 | Next 10 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.