SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Technology Stocks: Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
Posts: 117896 | Member SubjectMarks: 779 | Bans (4)

Add SubjectMark | Hide Original Post | Show Chart | Poster Summary | Share This Board

Moderated By: slacker711 -- (Moderated) -- Started: 12/15/2001 11:13:09 AM  Revision History


This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.


This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.

RULES

First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.

.............................................................................

Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 10 | Next 10 | View Recent | Post Message Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsDate
117896Leon Cooperman, founder of Omega Advisors with roughly 6 billion under managemenhueyone102:43:40 PM
117895Microsoft May Run WinRT on Qualcomm Processor BY Gary Krakow The_Net302:12:05 PM
117894As Dragons fly with a faster speed, Nvidia bites the dusk? Nvidia GPU LicensiThe_Net102:02:00 PM
117893Jeffrey / Slacker, re: QCOM v TXN…………………………………….. “…TXN revenues in Q1 '1Jim Mullens312:33:48 PM
117892Qualcomm picked up content in Galaxy S4, says William Blair William Blair said Bill Wolf310:10:59 AM
117891 TXN revenues in Q1 '13 declined 7.60%, as compared with the same quarter a slacker711107:11:11 AM
117890TXN revenues in Q1 '13 declined 7.60%, as compared with the same quarter a yJeffreyHF406:56:39 AM
117889 Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 incinerates the competition We got an early chance to BoonDoggler202:35:38 AM
117888I am of the opposite opinion. Invest in the business or buying back stock...otheElroy101:43:56 AM
117887>> It's very clear to me why many tablet designs scheduled for later tBDAZZ112:59:06 AM
117886Wow, talk about product placement. Q's Snapdragon commercial showed twice iRich Bloem212:39:50 AM
Previous 10 | Next 10 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.