SI
SI
discoversearch

Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
123784 827 0 QCOM
Emcee:  slacker711 Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.


This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.

RULES

First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.

.............................................................................

Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
123784Samsung does have its own LTE solution — but how effectively this device will womatherandlowell5yesterday
123783Tim Cook Defused Steve Jobs' Thermonuclear War, Then He Took Down Android Bsag-yesterday
123782Jay, re: What Samsung dropping Qualcomm from the Galaxy S6 could mean for US cuJim Mullens1yesterday
123781Would that collide with anti-trust laws? (Not that it is going to happen.)scribe1yesterday
123780Fast money guys last night on CNBC who had a short spread going into earnings onkech1yesterday
123779 China’s Self-Destructive Tech Crackdown By THE EDITORIAL BOARDJAN. 30, 2015 UBill Wolf-yesterday
123778After the CC, my initial thoughts took me back to 2010 when Qualcomm was paintinA.J. Mullen5last Friday
123777 Qualcomm Says the Snapdragon 810 is Working Just Fine BY JACOB KLEINMAN | JANUgutboy09-last Friday
123776i would think the 810 but the others might know better.gutboy09-last Friday
123775There also is increased competition in the mid and high tiers of the market in THE WATSONYOUTH-last Friday
123774Qualcomm to Return to Custom CPUs for Future Snapdragon Chips By Jeffrey Burtgutboy09-last Friday
123773 10 vital signs of the semicon industry from Jan 26th - 7 Pages http://www.eegutboy09-last Friday
123772China's antitrust issues threaten US semicon industry Posted: 30 Jan 2015[ggutboy09-last Friday
123771Apple puts the big hurt on Samsung 2015 will be a challenging year for the Koregutboy09-last Friday
123770China patents ranking 2014: ZTE is in the top placeUpdated:2015/1/22 10:15 Recgutboy09-last Friday
123769Thanks for the reply Maurice!gutboy09-last Friday
123768Qualcomm, Inc. Loses the Samsung Galaxy S6 By Ashraf Eassa | January 30, 2015 Bill Wolf-last Friday
123767The hard part is inventing the device that can be manufactured. Manufacturing aMaurice Winn-last Friday
123766I'd add to my prior Kraut comments that there are costs in being different fwaitwatchwander-last Friday
123765Each party will use what they have to negotiate or enforce lower royalty rates. Maurice Winn-last Friday
123764All- has QCOM ever done anything like this and could they afford it? That certaitemco2-last Friday
123763GB / Qbull/ all, Recap of analyst comments / target changes……………………............Jim Mullens1last Friday
123762 Google wireless service switches between Sprint, T-Mobile, Wi-Fi Jan 28, 2015, manning18-last Friday
123761FIDO Alliance Announces New Leadership Team for 2015 Snips>>> + Jim Mullens-last Friday
123760The 2009 Samsung license involved Samsung paying $1.3 bil in cash plus per unitJeffreyHF7last Friday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2015 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.