SI
SI
discoversearch

Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
133575 885 2 QCOM
Emcee:  slacker711 Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.


This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.

RULES

First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.

.............................................................................

Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
133575Well, this is a parting shot to the Jacobs from their Democrat friends. I have nJGoren12 hours ago
133574<Hoping this gets "trumped": Qualcomm's FTC Troubles Could Go ADash of Reality-2 hours ago
133573 Hoping this gets "trumped": Qualcomm's FTC Troubles Could Go AwGR8FORM16 hours ago
133572Tech Today: Defending Qualcomm, By TiernBill Wolf79 hours ago
133571[graphic] The ongoing evolution of mobile technologies from 4G to 5G providesBill Wolf-9 AM
133570Nokia P1 with Snapdragon 835, Sharp IGZO Display Rumored as Coming at MWC by JedBill Wolf28 AM
133569ANANDTECH: But perhaps the most interesting – and certainly most novel – aspectBill Wolf-8 AM
133568Qualcomm allegedly bribed Apple into not making a WiMAX iPhone Sorry, Intel and Bill Wolf-8 AM
133567Samsung, LG adopt thermal pipes for smartphones to be launched in 2017 Aaron LeBill Wolf-8 AM
133566 Snapdragon 835's second cluster is a Cortex A53 Bill Wolf-8 AM
133565Qualcomm Disputes FTC Allegation, Calls Action ‘Rushed’ Bill Wolf17 AM
133564Maybe this was just some Apple execs protecting their own butt when called upon waitwatchwander17 AM
133563They had to plead a conclusory nexus between lowered royalties and exclusivity, JeffreyHF-6 AM
133562There will be complete access to Discovery under the Federal Rules Of Civil ProcJeffreyHF25 AM
133561It does not matter which party instigated the exclusivity provision. I have postQurious12 AM
133560"QUALCOMM EXTRACTED BASEBAND PROCESSOR EXCLUSIVITY FROM APPLE IN EXCHANGE FProphet of Profits2yesterday
133559Bloomberg summary of events: Qualcomm Accused of Forcing Deal on Apple to ThwartGR8FORM-yesterday
133558 You've highlight the bad part of today's proceedings. The rest is a croslacker711-yesterday
133557Qualcomm Responds to Complaint from U.S. Federal Trade Commission SBill Wolf-yesterday
133556JeffreyHF, I'm not sure if the rules have changed, but the FTC is going afteDoug M.-yesterday
133555 You've highlight the bad part of today's proceedings. The rest is a crwaitwatchwander1yesterday
133554FOSS Patents (Florian Mueller seems pretty thrilled...........) Tuesday, JanuaBill Wolf-yesterday
133553<<This will be in litigation for a number of years>> If it goes toDoug M.-yesterday
133552This looks like a Section 5 Case. I remember doing a lot of research on that abDoug M.2yesterday
133551It's hard for me to keep up. MediaTek, Intel, Samsung, Spreadtrum, and HuaweJeffreyHF1yesterday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2017 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.