SI
SI
discoversearch

Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
131355 875 0 QCOM
Emcee:  slacker711 Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.


This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.

RULES

First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.

.............................................................................

Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
131355The low end iPhone SE has been hot. 72 to 78 millions for new iPhones! Would thaThe_Net-10 minutes ago
131354Prophet, re: INTC’s CEO and PJ...................... “...Some years ago, InteJim Mullens2an hour ago
131353Nice to see Qualcoms name in the settlement Nivida had w Samsung. Why NVIDIA’s GR8FORM33 hours ago
131352 28nm HPM production lines at TSMC, UMC to run at full capacity until 3Q16, sayneolib35 hours ago
131351 Chip suppliers cautious about unit production for upcoming iPhone Julian Ho, Tneolib-5 hours ago
131350Bendable Smartphones Are Coming.......... But are they ready for prime time? DavBill Wolf-6 hours ago
131349 Digitimes Research: China smartphone AP shipments to grow 11.3% sequentially iBill Wolf66 hours ago
131348If tablets are counted as IoT and not smartphones, I agree with Qurious that it&JeffreyHF-yesterday
131347<i>Catcher Technology (2474.Taiwan) jumped 9.9%</i> I think that shneolib-yesterday
131346Finally, for obvious reasons, QC probably has no interest in Intel today. If tSirWalterRalegh-yesterday
131345Re: "hmmm, this is why I keep thinking that Intel must try to buy Q." Prophet of Profits-yesterday
131344 Citation to authority for the proposition that Qualcomm counts all tablet proceslacker711-yesterday
131343Law of excluded middle. A Q enabled device is either a phone, or, if it is not aQurious-yesterday
131342The market is a horrible pricing mechanism in the short term and long term pricisag-yesterday
131341Citation to authority for the proposition that Qualcomm counts all tablet procesJeffreyHF-yesterday
131340Basically the entire industry (including Q and INTC) now considers any silicon nQurious2yesterday
131339Today's market settled it. All Apple suppliers, except QCOM, were up on newsJeffreyHF-yesterday
131338I think we both jumped to the wrong conclusion.......easy to do on the web......THE WATSONYOUTH1yesterday
131337'You Either Win Technology Transitions or You Don't Live to Tell the DayThe_Net-yesterday
131336Re:One company (QCOM) has a big edge in the fight to dominate the Internet of TJim Mullens3yesterday
131335Wasn't Murthy informed on the QC IOT portfolio while he was on the QC payrolThe_Net-yesterday
131334--->. Intel buys qcom But are they willing to pay for those patents and evenwaitwatchwander1yesterday
131333 Qualcomm has a significantly stronger patent portfolio, according to LexInnova’hedgefund-yesterday
131332 Google’s Daydream is Silicon Reality Hitting the 20 millisecond latency target slacker7115yesterday
131331Bill, Moor on the CCIX Consortium...............................................Jim Mullens-yesterday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2016 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.