SI
SI
discoversearch

Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
126880 850 0 QCOM
Emcee:  slacker711 Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.


This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.

RULES

First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.

.............................................................................

Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
126880Verizon Small Cells Ready to Rock in Chicago lightreading.com CHICAGO -- DepeFUBHO-yesterday
126879There's little point in hypothesizing what would be a good selling point, suArt Bechhoefer1yesterday
126878Unfortunately, the 9th Circuit seems to agree with some of the NDRC ruling as weArt Bechhoefer2yesterday
126877exactly. Same as Icahn did not give a damm what happened to MOT when he forced tengineer-yesterday
126876<<What would be Jana's objective, other than monetizing currently undeDoug M.-yesterday
126875<<Another possible outcome from the summary of the Motorola case is that QDoug M.-yesterday
126874it is a very complex formula dictated by GAAP, but it is straightforward. Just tengineer-yesterday
126873What would be Jana's objective, other than monetizing currently undervalued Art Bechhoefer-yesterday
126872One possible result of the 9th Circuit Court decision on the Motorola SEP, challArt Bechhoefer2yesterday
126871There is a lot of damage being done to the Samsung brand in mobile by the quarteneolib-yesterday
126870Jana Partner's Letter. Here's the part about the breakup - it's notDoug M.1yesterday
126869Well if slacker is correct that 2Q15 didn't have any A9 sales to Apple, thenneolib-yesterday
126868Qualcomm wins appeal in $173 mln ParkerVision case..............................Jim Mullens1yesterday
126867Neolib / Slacker, re: Samsung LSI / Exynos / Snapdragon- Neo…- “…Further, iJim Mullens-yesterday
126866so the YoY compare of the systems LSI is likely much more a factor of Apple thanslacker7111yesterday
126865 MediaTek posts lower revenues and profits for 2Q15 Jessie Shen, DIGITIMES, TaipBill Wolf4yesterday
126864Large write downs are a great way to save a few billion in taxes. I've ofteneolib-yesterday
126863That article was a tad clueless. They did provide details on memory vs LSI, andneolib-yesterday
126862In Microsoft’s Nokia Debacle, a View of an Industry’s Feet of Clay JULY 30, 2015Bill Wolf-yesterday
126861Qualcomm Move to Appease Activist Leaves Bondholders Frustrated by Michelle DaviBill Wolf1yesterday
126860Microsoft Beats Google as Patent Royalty Case May Aid Consumers July 30, 2015Bill Wolf1yesterday
126859Nice spin: Ditching Qcom helped Samsung make an extra billion. finance.yahoo.coBDAZZ-Thursday
126858<i>I think QTL would need to have some sort of ongoing payments to insure badger3-Thursday
126857 QCOM's license to Spinco would be royalty free. I dont think QTL charges aslacker7111Thursday
126856Slacker, re: proposed new IP tax treatment.......................... "...Jim Mullens1Thursday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2015 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.