Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
131990 880 1 QCOM
Emcee:  slacker711 Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.


First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.


Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
131990Doug -- That's correct; acquired proprietary technology becomes an asset, amArt Bechhoefer-8 hours ago
131989I don't have info on the actual transaction, but I would venture to guess thengineer-yesterday
131988<<Over the years they bought some patents that one has to seriously wonderDoug M.-Saturday
131987Over the years they bought some patents that one has to seriously wonder about twaitwatchwander-Saturday
131986<< The reasons are clear: Most of the firm's 17,000 patents, developedDoug M.-Saturday
131985Jeffrey / GR8FORM, re: Josh Brown. "interesting" CNBC video. I didn&Jim Mullens2Saturday
131984Wow, forgot what a pompous ass he was about it:)BDAZZ2last Friday
131983Brown's March call at $51, was itself a revisit of his January call at $43. JeffreyHF2last Friday
131982Here is josh brown. video.cnbc.comGR8FORM3last Friday
131981CNBC does revisit calls. If anyone catches a revisit of Browns Qcom call please BDAZZ1last Friday
131980Fact is Josh Brown is not an analyst. He's a financial advisor with a smalllml2last Friday
131979Totally different attitude from the participants. . . . Don't know if the anlml1last Friday
131978Lots of details about wireless power on that Richtree web site. I found this chwaitwatchwander1last Friday
131977Earning per share over $5 is what's new. All the rest we've seen beforewaitwatchwander-last Friday
131976Wireless charging to become major feature in mobile devices............. htJim Mullens-last Friday
131975". . . what to do once the Q gets back to 70." The simple answer is toArt Bechhoefer17last Friday
131974My question is what to do once the Q gets back to 70 : The dividend is good ifhedgefund3last Friday
131973Goldman Sachs has a $70 price target on Qualcomm stock Published By: Ken Bock oBill Wolf3last Friday
131972Samsung Strikes Back at Huawei in China Mobile Patents Suit Updated on July 21, Bill Wolf-last Friday
131971Also funny that Jana got out before most of the rise.kech4last Thursday
131970Qualcomm snaps nine-quarter streak of disappointing results Published: July 21,gutboy095last Thursday
131969Qualcomm: Back On Track.........................................................Jim Mullens3last Thursday
131968Agree on the expense cuts, but they did seem to panic at the worst time.BDAZZ1last Thursday
131967....and now its not. March is eons ago in the minds of the daily financial 'Jeff Vayda1last Thursday
131966<<I am still thankful to Jana for forcing or providing the catalyst for a Doug M.2last Thursday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2016 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.