SI
SI
discoversearch

Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
122007 811 0 QCOM
Emcee:  slacker711 Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.


This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.

RULES

First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.

.............................................................................

Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
122007I guess what I was basing that comment on was that TSMC supposedly went into volbadger3-3 hours ago
122006because a chip as they develop it and moving to production takes a long while. Iengineer43 hours ago
122005hmmm..808/810 sampling in late '14/early '15..which means devices availabadger3-5 hours ago
122004 A detailed leak of Q's near-term chipset roadmap. I dont see the successorslacker7115yesterday
122003NNovack,re: Tim Long ‘s QCOM/ China take. “…”We believe the current (stock) valJim Mullens3yesterday
122002I don't see a basis for 1H or 2H assumption of royalty settlement issue. WhArt Bechhoefer4yesterday
122001Tim Long Quoted on Chinese Export Royalties in IBD news.investors.com --------N.Novick2yesterday
122000Sharp Aquos Crystal Smartphone (Snapdragon) tomshardware.com The specificatirobcomptec-Tuesday
121999Didn't those companies also reduce their pricing, and modify their business JeffreyHF1Tuesday
121998 Entry-level 4G handset demand in China to increase during 2H14; expected to pusBill Wolf-Tuesday
121997Two big Japanese auto parts manufacturers caught up in the Chinese dragnet have Peter Sherman1Tuesday
121996Will Buyout Offer for OmniVision Hit Trouble By Johanna BeBill Wolf1Monday
121995China There was news that Chna govt was allowing major Chinese operators some fN.Novick-Monday
121994I think the Zacks guy just read your post and repeated it.. zacks.com Cluelessengineer-Monday
121993 The beat goes on at China Mobile. The 40% plus growth rate persists. chinamatherandlowell-Monday
121992ExactlyJim Mullens-Monday
121991Jim, "WRT GSM and Euro abuses in the past. . ." The GSM and Euro abusArt Bechhoefer-Monday
121990Art, re: QCOM China issues………………….. “QCOM has some leverage with Chinese regulJim Mullens1Monday
121989China’s telcos rallied after the government said it would allow the telecoms to Bill Wolf-Monday
121988Qualcomm denies hiring Chinese economist Zhang Xinzhu to write an economic analyBill Wolf-Monday
121987China finds Mercedes-Benz guilty of price fixing: Xinhua 4:10am EDT By Brenda GoBill Wolf1Monday
121986Isn't it closer to $205? $850/4.1544. Maybe $850m wasn't the cost ofA.J. Mullen-Sunday
121985Globalstar/Qualcomm. I got it wrong. PCSTEL was on the case though and correcMaurice Winn-Sunday
121984The Great Chinese Exodus Many Chinese are leaving for cleaner air, better schoBill Wolf-last Saturday
121983QCOM has some leverage with Chinese regulators as well as with the World Trade OArt Bechhoefer-last Friday
121982In that definition, the Chinese are running their own monopoly and enforcing it engineer9last Friday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2014 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.