SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Politics: The 2nd Amendment-- The Facts........
Posts: 9507 | Member SubjectMarks: 79 | Bans (2)

Add SubjectMark | Hide Original Post | Show Chart | Poster Summary | Share This Board

Moderated By: arno -- (Moderated) -- Started: 6/28/1998 12:30:00 PM  Revision History

"A well-regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. "

...2nd Amendment To the United States Constitution


Hmm. What does that mean in English? Go to: The Unabridged Second Amendment shadeslanding.com 

Personally, I think you can go to State firearm laws and get the original intent of the 2nd Amendment. All the states are listed at: State-by-State Firearm Laws nra.org 

For example:

From Indiana: "The people shall have a right to bear arms, for the defense of themselves and the State." Article 1 Section 32.

Notice how the vast majority of State Constitutions make the Right a little clearer?

Now, for a good, if not long, treatise on the 2nd Amendment: The Embarrassing Second Amendment shadeslanding.com 

Now, for the legal definition of militia, from the Federal Code: 10 USC Sec. 311 (01-16-96)http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/10/311.shtml .

Interesting!

Now, what some people in Congress have to say: REPORT of the SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION nidlink.com 

Now, what some Doctors have to say: violence.txt at ca-rkba.org 

What do academics have to say? A great source for scholarship on the 2nd Amendment can be found at Second Amendment Law Library 2ndlawlib.org 

What about all the handgun deaths! Outlaw them! Well, let's have a look at some muses on this point:

Heartland Policy Study Taking Aim at Gun Control heartland.org 

Funk N.W. U. Journal of Law and Criminology users.ox.ac.uk 

Finally, the latest from the Supreme Court on it's ruling of the "Brady Bill". It was not argued as a 2nd Amendment issue, but as a 10th Amendment issue. Check it out: JAY PRINTZ, SHERIFF/CORONER, RAVALLI COUNTY, MONTANA, PETITIONER 95-1478 v. UNITED STATES RICHARD MACK, PETITIONER 95-1503 supct.law.cornell.edu 

Notice what Judge Thomas says at the end? Someday...

Now, for the organizations:

NRA.org (National Rifle Association) Home Page nra.org 
Gun Owners of America gunowners.org 

For a Pro/Con debate, visit PBS's FRONTLINE Guns Pro and Con pbs.org 

Finally, keep in mind that the U.N., yes the U.N., wants our guns. They actually have TOO many resolutions to list here. Just go to United Nations Home Page and do a search on "guns", "firearms", etc. A real "eye opener"... un.org 
Previous 10 | Next 10 | View Recent | Post Message Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsDate
8557Do More Guns Increase the Homicide Rate? A Look at Worldwide Data Gun violeTimF-08/02/2012 10:31 AM
8556Brought home a nice old S&W 39-2 today(the wife was able to lay out some preSedohr Nod-07/31/2012 07:33 PM
8555Because they're fools? Why are Democrats such tools? ManyMoose207/31/2012 12:30 PM
8554They always have to fix something that isn't broke. It's in their naturFarmboy-07/31/2012 09:11 AM
8553This will make buying .30-06 surplus ammo for my M1 Garand from the CMP a bit did[-_-]b307/31/2012 01:07 AM
8552You forgot ignorant and hypocritical. As usual the hoplophobe left, (I love thatManyMoose207/30/2012 11:45 PM
8551Seems to me buying online creates not only a written, but permanent electronic rWayners-07/30/2012 10:16 PM
8550Hoplophobes just never give up. Obama To ‘Evaluate” Banning Online Ammunition SManyMoose207/30/2012 08:13 PM
8549Never let a good crisis go to waste! That's the typical way they operate Farmboy107/30/2012 07:36 PM
8548Incredible. He should have taken his own medicine and called 911 in futility anWayners107/30/2012 07:25 PM
8547Typical illogical leftist collectivist thinking. Punish everybody for the actioWayners307/30/2012 07:23 PM
Previous 10 | Next 10 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.