SanDisk Corporation (SNDK) | Stock Discussion Forums

Sponsor

Technology Stocks: SanDisk Corporation (SNDK)

Posts: 54982 | Member SubjectMarks: 458 | Bans (10)

SI Sentiment for SNDK: Insufficient votes accumulated

Add SubjectMark | Hide Original Post | Show Chart | Poster Summary | Share This Board

Moderated By: clean86 -- (Moderated) -- Started: 1/31/1996 2:15:00 PM Revision History

To all participants: Welcome to the Sandisk Corporation(SNDK) board on SI. This thread is now moderated. Here are the rules:

Nobody will be banned for disagreeing with the moderator or for disagreeing with anyone else. Nobody will be banned for stating bullish or bearish opinions, or for expressing opinions contrary to the opinions of others.

Participants will be banned for being rude to the other people on the thread. That includes ridiculing them or calling them names. If you disagree with someone, feel free to express your disagreement but do so in a civil manner. There is no reason to call people "stupid" or "crazy" or any other derogatory name.

When warranted, a ban may be imposed for being a general nuisance and disrupting civil discourse.

Violators will usually receive a warning, and a second offense may result in a ban. In the case of especially egregious violations, a ban may come without warning.

And hey, let's be careful out there.

Would any one care to enlighten the rest of us as to how SanDisk is positioned in the Flash memory market in relation to their competition and earnings potential. Thanks.

NOTE: 3/17/10
I have been informed by the management that SI policy prohibits any partisan discussion of politics on Forums that are dedicated to specific stocks. Please limit any discussion of politics to general comments on subjects directly related to Sandisk Inc. and its stock.

Update: 8/24/11

Having conferred with Ron via PM, I want to clarify this board's policy with respect to political discussions.

If a political issue affects Sandisk as a company more than it would most companies, it's fair game for discussion here. A hypothetical example would be if Congress were debating a bill that would make it illegal for anyone to download any media file to more than one device. Clearly, Sandisk would be affected a lot by the outcome of such a debate than would, say, JPM, MO, YUM, etc.

If a political issue affects the macro economy in some way, but doesn't affect Sandisk any more than it would any other company, that is not a topic for discussion here.

And as always, the civility rule applies, in all cases.

Previous 10 | Next 10 | View Recent | Post Message

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Date
54982	It strikes me that SanDisk management is devoting a lot more energy than usual	Bargain Hunter	-	07:30:23 PM
54981	Yes, that is why I said this: "It would appear that it is the Koreans again	Sam	-	05/24/2013 07:10 PM
54980	Sam, i was trying to point out; IMF echos Sandisk's view of first generation	Si_Detective	-	05/24/2013 06:58 PM
54979	Thanks for posting that, although the article seemed to be missing a lot of info	Sam	1	05/24/2013 02:51 PM
54978	when will 2D to 3D transition becomes cost effective, IMF's view... eetimes.	Si_Detective	2	05/24/2013 02:16 PM
54977	Reading the details of the analysis by Bernstein Research, I get the impression	Art Bechhoefer	1	05/24/2013 10:49 AM
54976	Samsung, SanDisk to Ride NAND’s Ascendency, Says Bernstein By Tiernan Ray May 23	Sam	-	05/24/2013 09:59 AM
54975	"NAND Flash contract prices are gradually declining due to the persistent e	Art Bechhoefer	-	05/24/2013 08:33 AM
54974	TrendForce: 1H'May NAND Flash Contract Prices Drop due to Seasonality Publi	Sam	-	05/23/2013 10:36 PM
54973	Greetings, Sandisk did show up last year as well. rttnews.com	franklin1	-	05/23/2013 03:27 PM
54972	It strikes me that SanDisk management is devoting a lot more energy than usual t	Art Bechhoefer	1	05/23/2013 11:15 AM

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):