| To: agent who wrote (16002) | 5/6/2008 11:05:46 PM |
| From: MathProf | Respond to of 18414 |
| |
Agent, no, Ballmer doesn't need to go. I second 2250's motion. The article you posted looks to me to be made up out of thin air, just to post something which has some zing. More real is this, previously posted, but called for again.
"Attacks on Microsoft reveal a fundamental ignorance of what's powering the behemoth's growth trajectory."
and
"Those who sneer at Ballmer's supposed ineptitude or, as Wired puts it, "mismanagement," are simply engaging in speculation and armchair quarterbacking. They also show a poor understanding of internal dynamics at Microsoft."
from
money.cnn.com 
and, after the fact, we also have
Investors, analysts laud Microsoft for 'moving on'
marketwatch.com
MP |
