Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)7/16/2002 9:57:44 AM
From: EdscharpRespond to of 19401
 
Yes, "American" has multiple meanings, as many English words do. By virtue of history and usage we Americans use the word to describe ourselves.

You may recall the assertion you made a week ago when you said, "..... America is a Continent, not a Country..."
Message 17698482

The point I have been trying to make from the beginning is that America is a continent and a country. To us, 'America' is synonymous with 'United States'. To others it may only mean the continent. I don't know why you don't (or can't) understand this, but I will give up trying.

The weak link in your argument about the decline of the U.S. is your implicit belief that the Palestinian "problem" will last indefinitely. This problem could've been resolved during the Clinton administration when Arafat declined an offer that would've given the Palestinians 97% of the land they wanted. Other opportunities will present themselves with other Palestinian leaders. I don't think Arafat's authority will last as long as you think.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)7/16/2002 10:45:29 AM
From: rrufffRespond to of 19401
 
You have a very simplistic view of history. Yes, empires have crumbled when they have gotten fat and lazy. Yes, it could happen to us. Yes, we are showing some signs of complacency, particularly in the 90's bubble. Yes, small gothic armies took down the Roman empire.

BUT-

You assume the Chinese and others are more efficient, a fact that does not hold true. Once reforms eliminate their basic slave labor the efficiencies pretty much follow our system, i.e., give someone bathroom luxury and he doesn't want to go back to an outhouse.

The bottom line is this - Some of your points are true in theory. We have now changed unfortunately for the entire world as a result of 9/11. I firmly believe that we will soon have the knowledge to take pre-emptive strikes on terrorists that will go a long way towards assuring our survival. It won't be pretty but it will be necessary. Both Israel and the US have shown that they can do what is necessary.

Needless to say, peace with dignity is a much better alternative, but you can't negotiate with those who are irrational. You must convince them first that they have more to lose. You can only brainwash lower level operatives into thinking that their suicide will bring them 37 virgins and a case of Stoly. Once the leaders realize their power base is shaken they will negotiate. Witness Arafat now saying he'd take the Clinton-Barak deal.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/24/2002 11:26:08 PM
From: Sir Auric GoldfingerRespond to of 19401
 
Hey crim, if this comes to be, you're doubly screwed: "SEC Is Likely to Tap Former FBI Director Webster For Head of Accounting Panel

By MICHAEL SCHROEDER
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

WASHINGTON -- The Securities and Exchange Commission is likely
to anoint former FBI director William Webster to head a new board
overseeing the much-criticized accounting industry on Friday, but only
after a public, partisan fight that will bloody him and embattled SEC
Chairman Harvey Pitt.

In an unusual move, Harvey Goldschmid, one of two Democrats on the
five-member SEC, demanded an open meeting to vote on the
nominees. At the meeting, he is expected to put forward John Biggs,
head of the big college teachers' pension fund, TIAA-CREF, for the
accounting job. The meeting has been called for 2:30 p.m. Friday, Oct.
25.

Mr. Pitt is likely to prevail, but the public
controversy is further tarnishing his image and
reinforcing the widespread view in Washington
that he is politically inept.

The SEC's other Democrat, Roel Campos, is
supporting Mr. Biggs, as are Democratic
congressional leaders and former SEC
Chairman Arthur Levitt. Much of the
accounting industry and some Republican
congressional leaders, however, oppose Mr.
Biggs, who was regarded as tough on outside
auditors who worked for TIAA-CREF.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which was passed in July following several
accounting scandals, created the new Public Oversight Board to govern
the standards used by auditors of public companies, to examine public
audit firms and to discipline accountants who violate securities laws.
The law requires the vote of a majority of the SEC commissioners to fill
the accounting board seats; it also requires that the SEC consult with
Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill and Federal Reserve Chairman Alan
Greenspan.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)4/14/2003 3:36:35 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 19401
 
FRANCOIS GOELO SUED BY SEC->SEC SUES EIGHT INDIVIDUALS AND FOUR ENTITIES IN STOCK MANIPULATION

The Commission announced today that it filed a civil action against
eight individuals and four entities for their conduct between April 1999
and July 2000 relating to the price manipulation, unregistered sales,
unreported stock ownership, and touting of securities issued by
BluePoint Linux Software Corporation (BluePoint), a publicly traded
company located in Evansville, Indiana.

The Commission's complaint, filed in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Ohio, alleges that Aaron Tsai (Tsai) formed
a shell company called MAS Acquisition XI Corporation in 1996 and made
false filings with the Commission to conceal his true ownership and
control of MAS shares and to make it appear that the shares could be
later sold without a registration statement in effect. According to the
Complaint, on February 17, 2000, MAS acquired a Chinese Linux company
and changed its name to BluePoint. On the same day, Michael Markow
(Markow) and his company Global Guarantee Corporation, Francois Goelo
(Goelo), Yongzhi Yang and his company, K&J Consulting, Ltd., and Ke Luo
and his company, M&M Management, Ltd. (collectively, the Promoter
Defendants) bought 3.75 million shares from Tsai for $250,000, or a
little more than $0.06 per share. The Commission alleges that the
Promoter Defendants acquired over 90% of BluePoint publicly traded
shares without reporting their ownership in any Commission filing.

The Commission further alleges that the Promoter Defendants along with
the participation of Sierra Brokerage Services, Inc. (Sierra) and its
two employees, Richard Geiger and Jeffrey Richardson, (collectively, the
Broker-dealer Defendants) worked in concert to create artificial trading
activity and to manipulate the share price of BluePoint from $6 to a
high price of $21 on the first day that BluePoint shares were traded on
March 6, 2001. The Promoter Defendants and Broker-dealer Defendants
dominated and control the BluePoint market that day. At all relevant
times, Tsai, the Promoter Defendants, Sierra and Richardson sold or
offered to sell shares in BluePoint without a registration statement in
effect, and Tsai and the Promoter Defendants never reported their sales
of BluePoint securities and the change in their ownership.

The Commission also alleges that Jerome Armstrong engaged in illegal
touting of BluePoint on March 6 and after because he promoted BluePoint
on the Raging Bull internet site, which carried hundreds of posts about
BluePoint without disclosing the compensation he received from Markow
and Goelo in return for his posts.

The Commission has charged: (1) Tsai, the Promoter Defendants, Sierra,
and Richardson with violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities
Act of 1933 (Securities Act); (2) the Promoter Defendants and Broker-
dealer Defendants with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and
Rule 10b-5 thereunder; or in the alternative, Markow and Global
Guarantee Corporation with aiding and abetting the other Promoter
Defendants' violations of these provisions; (3) Sierra with violating
Section 15(c)(1) of the Exchange Act and Richard Geiger and Jeffrey
Richardson with aiding and abetting that violation; (4) Armstrong with
violating Section 17(b) of the Securities Act; (5) the Promoter
Defendants with violating Sections 13(d)(1), 13(d)(2), and 16(a) of the
Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1(a), 13d-2(a), and 16a-3 thereunder, and
Tsai with violating Sections 13(d)(1) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and
Rules 13d-1(a) and 16a-3 thereunder. The Commission is seeking
permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment
interest, and civil penalties from all defendants.

[SEC V. Sierra Brokerage Services, Inc., Richard Geiger, Jeffrey A.
Richardson, Aaron Tsai, Michael E. Markow, Global Guarantee Corporation,
Francois Goelo, Yongzhi Yang, K&J Consulting, Ltd., Ke Luo, M&M
Management, Ltd., Jerome B. Armstrong, USDC, Southern District of Ohio,
Civil Action No. CV03-326] (LR-18088)



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)4/18/2003 11:52:20 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Business Week: Revenge of the Investor

DECEMBER 16, 2002

FINANCE

Revenge of the Investor

Angry shareholders are investigating brokerage fraud, waging proxy fights, and agitating for securities reform

When he saw the news on the Securities & Exchange Commission Web site, Floyd Schneider couldn't help but gloat. He swiftly contacted his friend and colleague, Richard M. Cocchieri, whose reaction was more subdued: satisfaction and professional pride. There it was, about halfway down the SEC News Digest of Sept. 30, 2002: The SEC was launching a civil enforcement action against 17 defendants, led by a Texas brokerage named Salomon Grey Financial Corp., accusing them of engaging in a pump-and-dump stock swindle.

These were the targets of their investigation--Schneider's and Cocchieri's. This was, as far as they were concerned, their enforcement action.

These two men are investigators--but they don't work for the SEC or the NASD or the FBI. Cocchieri is a dentist, Schneider a mortgage broker. They are in their early forties and live in the northwest suburbs of New York City. They don't hunt corporate wrongdoers to dig up grist for lawsuits or to snag government bounties. It's not about getting money. It's about getting even.

Like thousands of other investors, they became involved in the markets in the late 1990s and were disillusioned, big-time. Usually the story would have ended there, with a deflated portfolio, a pile of unopened brokerage statements, and a vow to stay away from stocks.

With stocks tanking, widespread economic misery, and scandals draining portfolios--$170 billion in direct losses from the eight major corporate and accounting controversies--it's no surprise that investors are fleeing. Some $2.4 billion poured out of equity mutual funds through Aug. 31, vs. net inflows of $43.6 billion of new money in the same period last year. But amid all the frustration, a new dynamic is emerging.

Many investors are taking matters into their own hands. They are fighting back--and winning. It's almost as if the Peter Lynch credo of the bygone bull market has been turned on its head. In his classic 1989 book, One Up on Wall Street, the legendary former Fidelity

Magellan manager preached the virtues of self-help. That spirit is still very much alive today, only now, instead of picking stocks, investors have turned to picking on their adversaries--stock promoters, online investment letters, and brokerages that push questionable stocks. Some, like Schneider, Cocchieri, and dozens of others, are investigating potential miscreants. Others are waging proxy contests and pressing for changes in SEC regulations. And they have turned state regulators around the country into the No. 1 engine of Wall Street reform.

The void at the top of the SEC--and the months of Harvey L. Pitt's widely criticized leadership--is a key reason for all this. Wall Street's own numbers tell the tale. A massive 41% of investors say that "dishonesty" is the main issue facing the securities industry today, vs. 8% a year ago, according to a survey conducted for the November annual meeting of the Securities Industry Assn., the brokerage trade group. And only 26% have much confidence that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act--which created a new accounting board and included other confidence-building measures--will substantially reduce corporate chicanery or accounting fraud.

Amid this meltdown in public confidence, investors are finding ways of compensating for the power vacuum in Washington. Investor-activists, by providing a kind of early warning system against small-stock fraud, offer crucial tips and research to an overburdened SEC in battling a $10 billion-a-year investor rip-off. Reacting to the portfolio losses of the rank and file, labor unions brought 40% of shareholder resolutions during the past year's annual meetings. The AFL-CIO is pushing for rules that would give small investors even more clout.

And if Wall Street thinks New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer is its worst nightmare, there are 49 other potential nemeses in the wings. In Utah alone, state regulators have referred 66 securities-fraud cases for criminal prosecution so far this year, vs. 35 during all of 2001. And more states are following suit by beefing up their securities-fraud laws and staffing up on scam-busters.

Even the securities industry's most cherished sacred cow, the arbitration system for settling disputes, is feeling the ferocity of investor wrath. Though the system is widely perceived as unfriendly to investors, their claims against brokers are running 12% higher than 2001's record levels. And a move by California to reduce arbitrator conflicts of interest is unfolding as a challenge for Wall Street's longtime control of the dispute-resolution process. Even before any laws change, some arbitrators are shedding their tendency to give the benefit of the doubt to large firms--as evidenced by a nearly $8 million judgment that was recently won against Merrill Lynch & Co. (MER ) for allegedly failing to execute a sell order. "The pendulum is shifting in favor of the investor," says Jacob Zamansky, a New York securities lawyer who has successfully taken on Merrill.

BusinessWeek has probed the depths of investor activism. The findings are surprising and, in a way, reassuring. If government continues to fall short, investors themselves will step in to do the job.

CITIZEN INVESTIGATORS

Cocchieri, Schneider, and people like them are the purest expression of investor self-help. When their profits turned to losses in the late 1990s, they didn't just give up. They turned the powerful information resources of the Internet against interconnected networks of promoters who use the Net to peddle stocks. The two men--at first "dumb as a rock," as Cocchieri puts it--have built a veritable armory of mostly free Net resources, including Web sites with SEC and other public documents, as well as search engines that mine other search engines. And they use them every single day.

Their research has led to a series of coups. For example, Schneider and Cocchieri honed in on a convicted stock manipulator named Theodore R. Melcher Jr., who pleaded guilty to stock-fraud charges in 1997 in one of the first federal prosecutions of Internet fraud. Melcher ran a Web site that was shut down when he was imprisoned. But after he was released in 1998, the pair found, he had gone back in business, quite legally running an investment Web site and continuing to promote small-cap stocks. Tracking the stocks that Melcher was pushing has led to other stocks and other promoters, information the two men shared with investigators.

The results of the past few months have been gratifying. Only 17 days after the Sept. 30 SEC action--which Salomon Grey, in papers filed with the SEC, has denounced as "frivolous"--the NASD brought action against a firm called National Capital Securities, which was the focus of an extensive investigation by Schneider. The NASD maintained that National Capital provided fraudulent research reports online. The NASD, citing longstanding policy, won't comment on whether information supplied by investors played a role. A person who answered the phone at National Capital's parent company said the securities firm was shutting down and that no one was available to comment.

Other investor activists are using the Internet to exchange information and put pressure on companies. The initial results have been encouraging. In late 2000, shareholders in the Texas-based Luby's Inc. cafeteria chain got organized through Yahoo! Inc. (YHOO ) message boards. As a result, the Committee of Concerned Luby's Shareholders ran its own slate of directors and won a respectable 24% of the vote. The dissidents say they deserve at least part of the credit for the departure of then-CEO Barry J.C. Parker, who they had slammed for failing to boost flagging sales. The committee went on to petition the SEC to make it easier for shareholders to run their own slates of directors. The rule change is pending.

There are limits to this kind of activism. Les Greenberg, a semiretired California lawyer who heads the Luby's committee, notes that staging a full-fledged proxy contest is something few small investors can pull off. It's complex, expensive, and requires professional assistance. Fortunately, help is at hand--from a traditional foe of the investor class.

LABOR'S CAPITALISTS

For years, AFL-CIO's Office of Investment labored in obscurity. It opened in 1997, to act as a shareholder advocate for labor unions' billions in pension fund holdings. No one paid much attention--not union members, not company managements, and certainly not the SEC. But today, the AFL-CIO is a player. The office's director, Bill Patterson, can hardly keep pace as he pursues one reform demand after another, ranging from corporate governance to accounting standards. He's desperately hiring staff to help push new shareholder initiatives.

Corporate America has felt labor's sting most directly in a hail of proxy resolutions. Last spring, unions placed 191 resolutions on company ballots, with that number comprising two-thirds of those put forth by institutional shareholders, according to the Investor Responsibility Research Center. Increasingly, companies are taking heed. For example, in October, Norfolk Southern Corp. (NSC ) and Bank of America (BAC ) adopted union-backed demands for restrictions on golden parachutes for executives. BofA now will require shareholder votes on top officers' severance payments that are more than double their annual pay. The AFL-CIO also is urging the SEC to allow stockholders who can muster support from, say, 10% of shareholders to nominate their own director candidates alongside management slates.

Already, unions are gearing up for the 2003 proxy season. They plan resolutions at every Standard & Poor's 100 company plus dozens more, bringing the total to close to 400. Patterson expects to win some of these battles before they even get to a vote. For example, this year the AFL-CIO negotiated standards on analyst independence with Goldman Sachs (GS ), Merrill Lynch (MER ), and J.P. Morgan Chase (JPM ), long before Spitzer turned his gunsights on the issue.

Wall Street firms might feel beleaguered by the constant drumbeat of investor-driven demands. But guess what? It's about to get worse.

STATES' RIGHTS

The campaign for Indiana Secretary of State doesn't generally get much attention, even in Indiana. This official issues licenses and registers corporations. Humdrum stuff. But in Indiana, the secretary of state is also in charge of securities regulation. And this year, the heat was turned up in what is usually a yawn-fest.

In this contest there wasn't a dime's worth of difference between Republican Todd Rokita, who won on Nov. 5 with 54% of the vote, and his Democratic opponent, John Fernandez. At least, not when it came to the newest mom-and-apple-pie issue--securities regulation. Both men vigorously hacked away at a theme that had great voter appeal in this solidly Republican state in 2002: The urgent need to incarcerate corporate wrongdoers.

What is getting Hoosiers up in arms nowadays can be summed up in three letters--A-E-S. AES Corp. acquired Indianapolis Power & Light Co. in July, 2000, only to see its share price collapse when wholesale electricity prices tumbled in the wake of Enron Corp.'s implosion. Investors were hit hard. "We have people in our own backyard now who have lost millions of dollars," says Fernandez. "The voters feel pain, and in typical political fashion, we're responding," says Rokita.

The measure that both Indiana candidates advocated--stepped-up criminal prosecutions--is not just empty political talk. Christine A. Bruenn, Maine's securities commissioner and president of the North American Securities Administrators Assn., says: "We preach it at every conference--that the way to get the message across is to bring a criminal action."

Regulators nationwide are saying "amen." In June, West Virginia adopted legislation making it easier to prosecute brokerage firms by strengthening the laws against securities sales practice and compliance violations. In Utah, the Attorney General's office has a financial crimes unit that prosecutes cases brought by the state's aggressive securities regulator, S. Anthony Taggart. In other states, despite widespread pressures on their budgets, securities regulators are quietly ratcheting up their forces--hiring a forensic accountant here, a prosecutor there.

So while Spitzer gets the headlines, his counterparts in the hinterlands are exercising their own muscle more and more. Missouri Secretary of State Matt Blunt, for example, has vocally objected to Merrill Lynch's proposed $100 million settlement with the states over charges that its analysts misled investors. Blunt is worried that fines are just "an operating cost for these companies: They pay the fine, which becomes just a cost of doing business." And he has a point. It's an article of faith in the securities industry that brokerage firms don't give a hoot about fines, unless they are huge. The real potential exposure comes from investors who feel they have been ripped off and would love to sue--but can't.

SLAUGHTERING A SACRED COW?

Through bull market and bear, one feature of Wall Street has remained the same--the arbitration system that handles disputes between brokers and customers. Administered by the NASD and New York Stock Exchange, it has long been criticized as biased against customers. Plaintiff lawyers contend that large firms have particularly benefited, because of a widespread assumption by arbitrators that they adhere to a higher standard of ethics than smaller, less well-known brokerages.

That's beginning to change. State regulators, led by California, are pushing to make arbitration fairer. And arbitrators and juries are delivering megaverdicts against big firms. In August, a couple in Pennsylvania won a $7.7 million judgment against Merrill Lynch, which allegedly failed to execute a sell order. Merrill Lynch is appealing. In October, an Ohio jury awarded $12 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages against Prudential Securities Inc. In a class action, more than 250 investors claimed that a broker had sold investments in 1998 without authorization. Prudential is fighting the verdict. The biggest judgment of all, in November, 2001, was a $430 million arbitration award against a former UBS PaineWebber and Lehman Brothers Inc. (LEH ) broker, Enrique E. Perusquia, who had pleaded guilty to stealing from customers. The Houston securities lawyer who won that verdict, Thomas R. Ajamie, believes arbitration forums remain a hazardous place for investors. Even so, some plaintiff lawyers say they believe that the big brokerages are losing their advantage. "I think it's clear that the presumptions and the biases of the panels have dramatically shifted in one specific area--which is the good faith that major brokerage firms had, going into Day One of the arbitration," says Bill Singer, a New York securities lawyer.

Even if the arbitrators themselves resist the change, the system itself is under attack from the investor's new ally, the states. California fired the first shot in September, 2001, when it passed legislation requiring new ethics standards. It requires arbitrators to disclose their potential conflicts of interest, such as business relationships between the parties and arbitrators' family members.

The NASD and NYSE went through the roof. As soon as the rules took effect on July 1, the two filed suit against California's Judicial Council, claiming that the rules are excessively burdensome and are preempted by federal law. After a brief flurry of papers--with the SEC siding with the two exchanges--U.S. District Court Judge Samuel Conti on Nov. 14 dismissed the suit on the grounds that the 11th Amendment prohibits naming state agencies as defendants. The NASD and NYSE are mulling an appeal.

The struggle in California over arbitration rules illustrates the problems facing investors as they flex their muscles. Wall Street remains as eager as ever to protect its prerogatives. But in state after state their clout is being felt, whether through suburban investor-investigators or Washington labor lobbyists, arbitrators or local prosecutors. They're fighting to make investor voices heard, and for the first time in memory, people in power are listening.

By Gary Weiss, with Aaron Bernstein in Washington, Michael Arndt in Chicago, and Emily Thornton, Mara Der Hovanesian, and Heather Timmons in New York

Copyright 2000-2002, by The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)4/22/2003 2:51:11 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
WELL FRANCOIS, JAIL NOW LOOKS LIKE A POSSIBILITY. WONDER IF THEY ALSO ADD ACCESSTEL TO THE LIST AS WELL? SCORE ONE FOR THE Z-8 SINCE I AM SURE THEIR IS MUCH MORE TO COME. Other similar opportunites are in the pipeline, if the arrangement is mutually agreeable...

==================================================

Score One Inc · 8-K · For 3/25/3 · EX-10.1

5.03 LITIGATION. Except for the investigation in Hong Kong and the
cooperation with the Securities and Exchange Commission. there is no claim,
action, suit, arbitration or other legal or administrative proceeding, nor any
order, decree or judgment pending or in effect, or to the best knowledge of
Score One, in progress or threatened, against or relating to Score One,
Advanced Technology or Fu Cheong, any of their officers or directors or the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement which could have a materially
adverse effect on Score One.
===================================

SPECIAL COVERAGE OF MARKOW AND GOELO'S HUGE PROBLEMS*
......."Portrait of an Honest Business Man."

FORMER BOILER ROOM BROKER SUES INTERNET POSTERS
THE BAZAAR STORY OF MICHAEL MARKOW AND THE CAYMAN TOUT

MICHAEL MARKOW AND
THE CAYMAN TOUTS ALEDGED SCHEME
TO SELL UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
VIA INTERSTATE COMMERCE TO CHAT
ROOM SUPPORTERS

FROM AN EMAIL SUPPLIED BY A UNDERCOVER OPERATIVE THAT DISCRIBES THE SCAMMING BRIBE:

The group responsible for the R/M would like to attract qualified Posters to support the stock on SI and RB message Boards... To provide an incentive, they offer up to 10,000 shares (no minimum) at approximately half the opening price, say $2.50, on the understanding that these shares would be kept a minimum of three months or until the price reaches the $15.00 level... The transaction would be in the form of Certificates overnighted to the poster's address and payment is expected after receipt... A full information package with product samples will also be made available...

If this proposal is of interest to you, kindly reply with the number of shares wanted, name, address and phone number, so that the Certs can be prepared in advance... Other similar opportunites are in the pipeline, if the arrangement is mutually agreeable...

Best regards,

================

**SPECIAL COVERAGE OF MICHAEL MARKOW'S HUGE PROBLEMS**

......."Portrait of an Honest Business Man."

........A litany of lies and a dossier of deceit

scan.cch.com 

scan.cch.com 

scan.cch.com 

Word has it that Michael Markow got tipped off and escaped the Boiler Room Raid?

I am sure it will all come out as the "Honest Business man" and "straight shooter" sues internet posters. His attorney from what I understand called Marcow an "Honest Business Man"?

Wonder if he is held in contemp of court?

Go to this arbitration link which is most shocking;
scan.cch.com 

-------------------------------------------

SEC Order Bars From Brokerage Industry Woodland
Hills: Latest action
comes after regulators shut down Brokers Investment
Corp., alleging it was a
huge boiler-room operation. Other former Brokers
Investment personnel have
set up a new firm nearby.

The Los Angeles Times (Pre-1997 Fulltext); Los
Angeles, Calif.; Aug 17, 1993; DON LEE; Abstract:
It was last year when the SEC initially suspected that
Brokers Investment was violating
securities law. In April the SEC alleged in Los
Angeles federal court that Shubert and
[Daniel H. Steinberg] were running a nationwide scam
in which Brokers Investment, along
with an obscure San Diego firm called U.S. Fiberline
Communications, defrauded investors
of at least $40 million by selling dubious investments
in telecommunications. The SEC said
Brokers' salesmen raised $109 million from 6,000
investors by reading sales scripts that
talked about annual returns of up to 32%, and that $40
million was pocketed or
fraudulently used by Shubert, Steinberg and others. [William Lawrence], in materials sent to former
clients of Brokers Investment, described
itself as a complete brokerage that deals in mutual
funds, stocks and other investments.
The brokerage was incorporated by Martin W. May in
1991 when he was head of sales
operations at Brokers Investment, papers from the
secretary of state and court
proceedings show. May, 42, is a third defendant in the
SEC's lawsuit against Brokers, and
is currently negotiating a separate settlement with
the SEC, the agency said. [Raymond H. Niesslein], 37, is a longtime associate of
Steinberg. Niesslein has not been
accused of any wrongdoing by the SEC in the Brokers
Investment case. Before joining
Brokers, he worked with Steinberg at a Canoga Park
brokerage selling oil and gas deals. In
1984, Niesslein and Steinberg were disciplined by
regulators in Wisconsin and California,
and without admitting or denying guilt, they agreed to
stop selling unregistered securities. Full Text:
(Copyright, The Times Mirror Company; Los Angeles
Times 1993all Rights reserved) Norman D. Shubert and Daniel H. Steinberg, accused by
the Securities and Exchange Commission in a
complaint filed in federal court last spring of
running a huge boiler-room operation in Woodland
Hills,
have agreed to a federal order that bars them from the
brokerage industry for life. The SEC order prohibits Shubert and Steinberg, both
Calabasas residents, from "association with any
broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer,
investment adviser or investment company." Shubert,
61, and
Steinberg, 37, signed the administrative order without
admitting or denying guilt, and it took effect July
29. Steinberg said the cost of fighting the SEC was one
reason he agreed to the ban. "I was left with few
alternatives." Steinberg now works at a memorabilia
business in Tarzana called American Legacy. "I'm
out of the securities industry." Shubert did not return telephone calls for this story. The SEC order is the latest, and strongest, regulatory
action against the former owners of now-defunct
Brokers Investment Corp. in Woodland Hills. And it may
have been prompted by reports that Shubert
and Steinberg have been involved with a new brokerage
called William Lawrence Securities, also in
Woodland Hills, which was formed by executives at
Brokers Investment as regulators were closing in
on that firm. It was last year when the SEC initially suspected that
Brokers Investment was violating securities law.
In April the SEC alleged in Los Angeles federal court
that Shubert and Steinberg were running a
nationwide scam in which Brokers Investment, along
with an obscure San Diego firm called U.S.
Fiberline Communications, defrauded investors of at
least $40 million by selling dubious investments in
telecommunications. The SEC said Brokers' salesmen
raised $109 million from 6,000 investors by
reading sales scripts that talked about annual returns
of up to 32%, and that $40 million was pocketed or
fraudulently used by Shubert, Steinberg and others. An SEC investigation is still determining how much
money is missing and where it went. Pending that
report, expected by year-end, the defendants could be
forced to make restitution to investors and pay
civil penalties. In April of this year, Shubert and Steinberg signed an
SEC consent order, without admitting or denying
guilt, promising not to sell unregistered securities
or break any other securities law. And under pressure
from the SEC, Brokers Investment shut down last
spring. But as Brokers was winding down its business early
this year, William Lawrence was setting up shop in
Woodland Hills, just down the street from where
Brokers once operated in Warner Center. When
William Lawrence opened for business in early spring,
Shubert had an office in the back of that
brokerage. Although Shubert and Steinberg had no official titles
at William Lawrence, they held a reception for its
opening, and Shubert attended regular meetings at the
new brokerage, according to an internal company
memo and former employees at William Lawrence. The
SEC, when asked about Shubert's presence at
William Lawrence earlier this summer, simply said he
should not be there. William Lawrence, in materials sent to former clients
of Brokers Investment, described itself as a
complete brokerage that deals in mutual funds, stocks
and other investments. The brokerage was
incorporated by Martin W. May in 1991 when he was head
of sales operations at Brokers Investment,
papers from the secretary of state and court
proceedings show. May, 42, is a third defendant in the
SEC's lawsuit against Brokers, and is currently
negotiating a separate settlement with the SEC, the
agency said. May was secretary and treasurer at William Lawrence,
but recently resigned from those posts and is
now working as a broker at William Lawrence, said
Raymond H. Niesslein, formerly senior vice
president at Brokers and now president of William
Lawrence. Niesslein confirmed that former Brokers Investment
personnel made the move to William Lawrence
early this year, taking with them some active accounts
and client lists from Brokers Investment.
Niesslein also said that Shubert had maintained an
office at William Lawrence. However, Niesslein said in an interview that Shubert
had moved out of William Lawrence's office in
early July and that Shubert now has no involvement
with the brokerage. Asked what Shubert had been
doing at William Lawrence's offices, Niesslein said,
"he had a lot of things he had to wind up, and we
allowed him to lease some office space." Niesslein added: "We have a lot of old baggage. We're
trying to eliminate it." It was Shubert who formed Brokers Investment in 1985
as a discount brokerage, and a couple of years
later Steinberg and Niesslein joined him. From 1989 to
mid-1992, Brokers sold mainly limited
partnerships that were supposed to be invested in U.S.
Fiberline's projects. Niesslein, 37, is a longtime associate of Steinberg.
Niesslein has not been accused of any wrongdoing by
the SEC in the Brokers Investment case. Before joining
Brokers, he worked with Steinberg at a Canoga
Park brokerage selling oil and gas deals. In 1984,
Niesslein and Steinberg were disciplined by regulators
in Wisconsin and California, and without admitting or
denying guilt, they agreed to stop selling
unregistered securities. But there are signs that regulators are now looking
into activities at William Lawrence, which is selling
some investment deals that were originally designed
and marketed by Brokers Investment. Complaints have been filed by investors with the
National Assn. of Securities Dealers-a regulatory
group based in Washington-involving William Lawrence.
The NASD typically investigates investor
complaints. Aaron Rose, a former William Lawrence broker, said a
compliance officer with the NASD last month
questioned him extensively about William Lawrence's
use of sales scripts-or prepared materials that are
read to potential investors. The NASD declined to comment on whether it was
investigating William Lawrence. But a regional
official at the NASD said it was responding to some
complaints from clients of William Lawrence. Rose and other former employees at William Lawrence
provided to The Times copies of scripts that
they said were furnished by managers at William
Lawrence. In one set of scripts, designed for a
boat-leasing deal called IBS Financial Partners,
brokers at William Lawrence were told to tell
potential
investors: "IBS is certain that they can place easily,
$4 million per month from April throughout the rest
of 1993 and can double that number in 1994. . . .
Based on these numbers" investors "could have three
times their investment in just two years." Such scripts, though marked "for training purposes
only," were read verbatim by salesmen, former
William Lawrence employees said. Earlier this month,
Michael Burnett, a Louisville, Ky., businessman
who is an IBS director, confirmed that IBS, which is a
start-up operation, has yet to produce any
revenue. NASD rules strictly prohibit presenting
optimistic or unrealistic forecasts about investments. Niesslein, the president of William Lawrence,
acknowledged the existence of such sales scripts, but
said
that in the last month he had discarded them and is
instructing brokers at William Lawrence not to read
training materials over the phone. "We know where
Brokers Investment got in trouble and don't want to
repeat their mistakes," Niesslein said. Finding investors for the IBS partnership was
originally handled by Brokers Investment and then was
marketed by William Lawrence, Niesslein said.
According to the prospectus, IBS, a
Nevada-incorporated business formed partly by Shubert
and Steinberg, signs agreements with boat
manufacturers. In turn, the boat makers agree to lease
boats to people through IBS, for which IBS
receives certain fees. The prospectus, dated in
February, said Shubert and Steinberg are general
partners in IBS, meaning they are part of the
management team and entitled to benefit from the
performance of the business. Burnett said Shubert and Steinberg resigned as general
partners of the business last spring, although
they remain minority shareholders. But the change has
not yet been recorded with the secretary of
state's office in California, which such partnerships
must do within 30 days of the change. Burnett said
failure to record the management change was an
"oversight" and that it is now being addressed. Shubert, as recently as June, was also soliciting
money from investors for another deal that Brokers
sold
late last year, according to letters sent out to
potential investors. That deal was designed to raise
more
than $1 million to finance a firm called Berleca USA,
which wanted to market apparel using the
Coca-Cola name under a license agreement with the
beverage company. According to the prospectus, Berleca is partly owned
by Shubert, and the program is managed by
Sovereign Capital Group of Las Vegas, which is also
owned by Shubert and was the managing partner
of some Fiberline deals. Coca-Cola, based in Atlanta,
declined to comment. In a letter dated June 8, Shubert told investors that
Berleca was not performing well, and he concluded
by saying: "Should any of you have the ability and the
interest in providing bridge financing to Berleca,
please contact Warner Capital Group, their investment
banker." State records show Warner Capital is owned by Thomas
Shubert, Norman Shubert's son. Warner
Capital operates in the back end of William Lawrence's
offices. Niesslein said Thomas Shubert, who also previously
worked at Brokers Investment, was not involved in
any way with William Lawrence. Thomas Shubert refused
to comment. [Illustration]
PHOTO: Office of William Lawrence Securities, which
opened near Brokers Investment in Woodland Hills. /
Los
Angeles Times; PHOTO: Daniel H. Steinberg and Norman
D. Shubert, former owners of now-defunct Brokers
Investment Corp., pictured on VICA magazine cover. Sub Title:
[Valley Edition]
Start Page:
4
ISSN:
04583035



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)4/23/2003 11:54:36 AM
From: StockDungRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 19401
 
ATELE - ACCESSTEL INC
MPID Bid Size Ask Size U O/C
SCHB 0.04 5000 0.06 5000 O
FRAN 0.03 5000 0.05 5000 O
NITE 0.025 5000 0.055 5000 O
WDCO 0.025 5000 0.055 5000 O
MHMY 0.02 5000 0.51 2500 O
WIEN 0.02 5000 0.06 5000 O
VFIN 0.02 5000 0.1 5000 O
RMRK 0.015 5000 0.055 5000 O
ACAP 0.01 5000 0.51 2500 O
BAMM 0.01 5000 0.48 5000 O
GVRC 0.01 5000 0.06 5000 O
PERT 0.01 5000 0.1 5000 O
PGON 0.01 5000 0.06 5000 O
HILL 0.01 5000 0.06 5000 O


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)7/27/2003 2:14:29 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
It Looked Good on Paper

U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION

LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 18088 / APRIL 14, 2003 SEC V. SIERRA BROKERAGE SERVICES, INC., RICHARD GEIGER, JEFFREY A. RICHARDSON, AARON TSAI, MICHAEL E. MARKOW, GLOBAL GUARANTEE CORPORATION, FRANCOIS GOELO, YONGZHI YANG, K&J CONSULTING, LIMITED, KE LUO, M&M MANAGEMENT, LIMITED, JEROME B. ARMSTRONG, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Civil Action No. CV03-326 (S.D. Ohio)

The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") today filed a civil action against eight individuals and four entities for their conduct between April 1999 and July 2000 relating to the price manipulation, unregistered sales, unreported stock ownership, and touting of securities issued by BluePoint Linux Software Corporation ("BluePoint"), a publicly-traded company located in Evansville, Indiana. The Commission's complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, alleges that Aaron Tsai ("Tsai") formed a shell company called MAS Acquisition XI Corporation in 1996 and made false filings with the Commission to conceal his true ownership and control of MAS shares and to make it appear that the shares could be later sold without a registration statement in effect. According to the Complaint, on February 17, 2000, MAS acquired a Chinese Linux company and changed its name to BluePoint. On the same day, Michael Markow ("Markow") and his company Global Guarantee Corporation, Francois Goelo ("Goelo"), Yongzhi Yang and his company, K&J Consulting, Ltd., and Ke Luo and his company, M&M Management, Ltd. (collectively, the "Promoter Defendants") bought 3.75 million shares from Tsai for $250,000, or a little more than $0.06 per share. The Commission alleges that the Promoter Defendants acquired over 90% of BluePoint publicly traded shares without reporting their ownership in any Commission filing. The Commission further alleges that the Promoter Defendants along with the participation of Sierra Brokerage Services, Inc. ("Sierra") and its two employees, Richard Geiger and Jeffrey Richardson, (collectively, the "Broker-dealer Defendants") worked in concert to create artificial trading activity and to manipulate the share price of BluePoint from $6 to a high price of $21 on the first day that BluePoint shares were traded on March 6, 2001. The Promoter Defendants and Broker-dealer Defendants dominated and control the BluePoint market that day. At all relevant times, Tsai, the Promoter Defendants, Sierra and Richardson sold or offered to sell shares in BluePoint without a registration statement in effect, and Tsai and the Promoter Defendants never reported their sales of BluePoint securities and the change in their ownership. The Commission also alleges that Jerome Armstrong engaged in illegal touting of BluePoint on March 6 and after because he promoted BluePoint on the Raging Bull internet site, which carried hundreds of posts about BluePoint without disclosing the compensation he received from Markow and Goelo in return for his posts. The Commission has charged: (1) Tsai, the Promoter Defendants, Sierra, and Richardson with violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"); (2) the Promoter Defendants and Broker-dealer Defendants with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; or in the alternative, Markow and Global Guarantee Corporation with aiding and abetting the other Promoter Defendants' violations of these provisions; (3) Sierra with violating Section 15(c)(1) of the Exchange Act and Richard Geiger and Jeffrey Richardson with aiding and abetting that violation; (4) Armstrong with violating Section 17(b) of the Securities Act; (5) the Promoter Defendants with violating Sections 13(d)(1), 13(d)(2), and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1(a), 13d-2(a), and 16a-3 thereunder, and Tsai with violating Sections 13(d)(1) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1(a) and 16a-3 thereunder. The Commission is seeking permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties from all defendants.   SEC Complaint in this matter  sec.gov 
Home | Previous Page Modified: 04/14/2003



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)7/28/2003 11:04:48 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
FRANCOIS GOELO, THEY ARE TALKIN ABOUT YOU AGAIN ON RAGINGBULL;

By: beowulfenvest
28 Jul 2003, 08:02 PM EDT Msg. 13194 of 13195
(This msg. is a reply to 13192 by monkeyfan2.)
Jump to msg. #

IF I understand the ATEL posts correctly,Mr. MICHAEL M. MARKOW is considering a plea bargain with the SEC.An action not supported by the other defendants. BTW, the SEC uses Civil Actions to build criminal cases.
There are no shortage of stock swindles. It's a growth industry due to SEC policy and practice. My concern remains the HK folks behind this deal, if any.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)7/29/2003 2:43:18 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
FRANCOIS, MICHAEL MARKOW HAS LEARNED ONE THING FROM ALL THIS. HOW TO FILE A 13D.

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


SCHEDULE 13D
(Rule 13d-101)

INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN STATEMENTS FILED PURSUANT
TO RULE 13d-1(a) AND AMENDMENTS THERETO FILED PURSUANT TO
RULE 13d-2(a)

(Amendment No. __________ )(1)


AccessTel, Inc., a Utah Corporation

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(Name of Issuer)


Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value Per Share

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(Title of Class of Securities)

004 33C 10 0


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(CUSIP Number)


Michael M. Markow
15760 Ventura Blvd, Suite 1020
Encino, California 91436
(818) 783-0054

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name, Address and Telephone Number of Person Authorized to Receive Notices and Communications)


July 25, 2003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(Date of Event which Requires Filing of This Statement)
If the filing person has previously filed a statement on Schedule 13G to report the acquisition that is the subject of this Schedule 13D, and is filing this schedule because of Rule 13d-1(e), 13d-1(f) or 13d-1(g), check the following box [_].


Note: Schedules filed in paper format shall include a signed original and five copies of the schedule, including all exhibits. See Rule 13d-7 for other parties to whom copies are to be sent.


(Continued on following pages)


(Page 1 of Pages)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) The remainder of this cover page shall be filled out for a reporting person's initial filing on this form with respect to the subject class of securities, and for any subsequent amendment containing information which would alter disclosures provided in a prior cover page.
The information required on the remainder of this cover page shall not be deemed to be "filed" for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section of the Act but shall be subject to all other provisions of the Act (however, see the Notes).



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CUSIP No.004 33C 10 0 13D Page 1 of 2 Pages


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 NAME OF REPORTING PERSONS
I.R.S. IDENTIFICATION NOS. OF ABOVE PERSONS (ENTITIES ONLY)

GLOBAL GUARANTEE CORPORATION, a California Corporation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX IF A MEMBER OF A GROUP*
(a) [_]
(b) [_]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 SEC USE ONLY



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 SOURCE OF FUNDS*


00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 CHECK BOX IF DISCLOSURE OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IS REQUIRED
PURSUANT TO ITEMS 2(d) OR 2(e) [X]



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 CITIZENSHIP OR PLACE OF ORGANIZATION


CALIFORNIA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 SOLE VOTING POWER

NUMBER OF

SHARES 5,979,550
----------------------------------------------------------------
8 SHARED VOTING POWER
BENEFICIALLY

OWNED BY 0
-----------------------------------------------------------------
EACH 9 SOLE DISPOSITIVE POWER

REPORTING

PERSON 5,979,550
-----------------------------------------------------------------
10 SHARED DISPOSITIVE POWER
WITH


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11 AGGREGATE AMOUNT BENEFICIALLY OWNED BY EACH REPORTING PERSON


5,979,550
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 CHECK BOX IF THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT IN ROW (11) EXCLUDES CERTAIN SHARES*

[-]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13 PERCENT OF CLASS REPRESENTED BY AMOUNT IN ROW (11)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14 TYPE OF REPORTING PERSON*


CO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*SEE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE FILLING OUT!






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CUSIP No.004 33C 10 0 13D Page 2 of 2 Pages


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 1. Security and Issuer.

This statement on Schedule 13D relates to the common stock, $0.001 par
value per share (the "Common Stock"), of AccessTel, Inc. a Utah corporation (the
"Issuer"). The principal executive office of the Issuer is located at 9005
Cobble Canyon Lane, Sandy, Utah 84093.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 2. Identity and Background.

(a)-(c) This statement on Schedule 13D is filed by Global Guarantee
Corporation, a California corporation ("Reporting Person"). Reporting
Person currently operates as a business consulting firm. Reporting
Person's principle office is located at 15760 Ventura Blvd., Suite
1020, Encino, California 91436.

(d) During the last five years the Reporting Person has not been convicted
in a criminal proceeding. During the last five years, none of the
executive officers and none of the directors of the Reporting Person
have been convicted in a criminal proceeding

(e) During the last five years the Reporting Person, including its
president and chairman Michael Markow, was a party to Administrative
Order No. CD-2000-00 (the "Order"), issued by the Alabama Securities
Commission on March 3, 2000. Pursuant to the Order, as a result of not
being registered nor exempt from registration as a dealer or agent in
the state of Alabama at the time of the transaction at issue,
Reporting Person, including its president and chairman, were ordered
to stop and abstain from offering or selling any security into, within
or from the State of Alabama.

(f) United States of America.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 3. Source and Amount of Funds or Other Consideration.

The Reporting Person acquired 5,361,981 shares of Common Stock pursuant to
a confidential settlement of a legal action involving a legal debt owed by the
original owner of said shares of Common Stock to the Reporting Person. The
Reporting Person acquired an additional 617,569 shares of common stock through
purchase in the open market at various market prices.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 4. Purpose of Transaction.

The Reporting Person acquired the shares of Common Stock for investment
purposes. 5,361,981 shares of Common Stock were acquired pursuant to the
confidential settlement of a legal action as described in Item 3 hereof.

The Reporting Person intends to review on a continuing basis its investment
in the Issuer and may, depending upon the evaluation of its financial planning,
upon the Issuer's business and prospects and upon future developments in general
business, economic and market conditions, determine to increase, decrease or
continue to hold or dispose of the position in the Issuer.

Except as set forth in the previous paragraphs, the Reporting Person has no
plans or proposals that relate to or would result in:

(a) the acquisition by any person of additional securities of the Issuer,
or the disposition of securities of the Issuer;

(b) an extraordinary corporate transaction, such as a merger,
reorganization or liquidation or any of its subsidiaries;

(c) any change in the present Board of Directors or management of the
Issuer;

(d) any material change in the present capitalization or dividend policy of
the Issuer;

(e) any other material change in the Issuer, involving the Issuer or any of
its subsidiaries;

(f) a sale or transfer of a material amount of assets of the Issuer's
business or corporate structure;

(g) changes in the Issuer's charter, bylaws or instruments corresponding
thereto or other actions which may impede the acquisition of control of the
Issuer by any person;

(h) causing a class of securities of the Issuer to be delisted from a
national securities exchange or to cease to be authorized to be quoted in
an inter-dealer quotation system of a registered national securities
association;

(i) a class of equity securities of the Issuer becoming eligible for
termination of registration pursuant to Section 12(g)(4) of the Exchange
Act; or

(j) any action similar to any of those enumerated in (a)-(i) above.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 5. Interest in Securities of the Issuer.

(a) The table below sets forth the aggregate number of shares and
percentage of the Company's outstanding shares beneficially owned by the
Reporting Person.

REPORTING PERSON-NUMBER OF SHARES -PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL-CITIZENSHIP

Global Guarantee Corporation 5,979,550 17.9% United States of America

(b) The Reporting Person, holds the sole power to vote and to dispose or
direct the disposition of its shares of Common Stock.

(c) The Reporting Persons has not effected any transaction in the Common
Stock during the past 60 days, except as disclosed herein.

(d) Not applicable.

(e) Not applicable.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 6. Contracts, Arrangements, Understandings or Relationships with Respect
to Securities of the Issuer.

None.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 7. Material to be Filed as Exhibits.

None.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIGNATURE
After reasonable inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify that the information set forth in this statement is true, complete and correct.


July 29, 2003


(Date)


/s/MICHAEL M. MARKOW
----------------------------------------
(Signature)






Michael M. Makow / President


(Name/Title)
Attention. Intentional misstatements or omissions of fact constitute federal criminal violations (see 18 U.S.C. 1001).



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)7/31/2003 8:22:02 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Top Ten James Bond Quotes


10. "Play it again, Sam."

Bond, after dropping Cha into a piano (Moonraker).



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


9. "Where's Goldfinger?" "Playing his golden harp."

To Pussy Galore after Goldfinger is sucked out of the airplane (Goldfinger).




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


8. "He just dropped in for a quick bite."

Bond after fighting the steel toothed Jaws (The Spy Who Loved Me).




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


7. The following exchange is from Diamonds are Forever.

Girl: "Hi, I'm Plenty."

Bond: "But of course you are."

Plenty: "Plenty O'Toole."

Bond: "Named after your father perhaps."

Bond meets Plenty in a Vegas casino.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


6. "Get dressed, and I'll buy you an ice cream."

To Bibi Dahl, teenage ice skater, who unsuccessfully tries to seduce Bond (For Your Eyes Only).




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


5. "Heartbroken Mr. Drax."

After Shooting Drax in the heart with Bond's wrist dart gun (Moonraker).




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


4. "Women Drivers."

To Major Amasova, who can't drive a stick shift, as Jaws tears apart their van (The Spy Who Loved Me).




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


3. "It's all in the wrist."

Mocking Kamal Khan while playing backgammon with Khan's loaded dice (Octopussy).




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


2. "I think he got the point."

After impaling Vargas with a spear gun in Thunderball.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


1. This is probably the most famous quote from any Bond movie (Goldfinger).

Bond: "Do you expect me to talk?"

Goldfinger: "No Mr. Bond, I expect you to die!"



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/1/2003 5:24:09 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Clown College is by enrollment. To enroll you must contact the Foundation President. The Clown Museum is small but growing. It includes the Clown Wall of Fame. On this wall are clowns of the year for Clowns of America International, World Clowns Association, Rodeo Clowns, Safety Clowns, Circus Clowns and Shriner Clowns.
Directions: U.S. 27 turn W. at stop light on Interlake Blvd. Go across RR track. Brick bldg. on left.

Toby's Clown College and Clown Museum

112 W. Interlake Blvd.
Lake Placid, FL 33852

Local Phone: 863-465-4438
Other Phone: 863-465-2920
Fax: 863-465-2731



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/3/2003 4:38:45 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 19401
 
YOU SAID WHAT TO THE SEC?!!!

By Stanley C. Morris, Esq.

Don’t get caught in a Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) ambush. If you receive a SEC enforcement ambush call, you may face catastrophic admissions that cannot be cured. That is why every organization or individual that may be subject to such a call must develop an effective plan of action before the SEC or some other regulatory or enforcement agency calls.

THE AMBUSH
In the early stages of an investigation, the SEC enforcement staff and other securities regulatory bodies frequently employ an investigative technique called the “ambush.” The “ambush” is the first phone call made to the subject of an investigation. It is made without warning.

During the call, the SEC staff attorney interrogates an individual or representative of an entity with the goal of obtaining critical admissions and/or catching the subject lying about facts already known to the SEC.

The enforcement staff is attempting to lock the subject into a particular story from which he or she cannot be extricated. Often, the subject mistakenly believes that he or she can talk their way out of the problem. He or she blabs every detail to the interrogator in an effort to “make friends” with the staff attorney. This can lead to more serious and penetrating investigations.

How do you prepare for this call? Prepare your responsive strategy with the advice of an experienced SEC enforcement defense attorney in advance and make sure all your employees know the proper response policy. Most importantly, make sure everyone representing you complies with that policy.

In short, you and your staff should be courteous to the SEC attorney, but never answer any questions until after you have discussed the matter with experienced SEC enforcement defense counsel.

Politely explain to the SEC attorney calling that it is your policy to cooperate fully with all governmental authorities, but that you must consult with an attorney before answering any questions. Refuse to engage in any further conversation, other than to get the caller’s name and telephone number. Immediately call an attorney experienced in dealing with SEC enforcement matters. Have that attorney call the SEC enforcement attorney on your behalf. Once the SEC attorney knows that an attorney represents you and/or your company, the SEC will not contact you and/or any of your employees directly without including your attorney.

THE COME HITHER LETTER
The “ambush” call usually is followed by a letter, known by the SEC staff as the “come hither” letter. The “come hither” letter requests the subject to voluntarily appear at the SEC to testify under oath and to produce an exhaustive list of documents.

A “come hither” letter will not, however, provide you with any information about who the targets of the investigation are or what violations the SEC suspects may have occurred.
The document request included as part of the SEC’s “come hither” letter casts a broad net as part of the SEC attorney’s “fishing expedition.” Fortunately, unless you are a registered broker-dealer, documents produced or testimony provided pursuant to a “come hither” letter is voluntary. This puts you in a relatively good position to negotiate with the SEC regarding the amount and type of documents you will produce. You must use this negotiating power skillfully to narrow the scope of the documents requested. Many unwary targets initially provide too much information in an effort to befriend the SEC staff member. This usually exposes the subject to broader inquiries into areas about which the SEC previously was unaware.

Based on the SEC attorney’s agreement to narrow the scope of the document production, your counsel may be able to detect what type of investigation the SEC is conducting and what violations the SEC suspects may have occurred. The bulk of SEC investigations can be lumped into one of the following types of charges: (i) offering fraudulent unregistered securities; (ii) accounting deficiencies; (iii) insider trading; (iv) broker-dealer sales practices; (v) failure to supervise; (vi) “soft dollar” practices and (vii) disclosure problems. Your attorney should be able to limit the documents produced to those that are relevant to the suspected violations.

Once the SEC has been forced to reveal some of its cards, your attorney can help you make an informed judgment on the extent to which voluntary cooperation with the SEC is in your best interest. In most types of investigations the SEC moves very slowly and conducts a protracted investigation. But, if the violation is ongoing, the SEC can move quickly for a stop trading order or an emergency injunctive action with a complete asset freeze. Accordingly, it is at this time that you will want to weigh the costs and benefits of taking immediate remedial action to correct any problems that exist and prevent the SEC from obtaining emergency relief. Regardless of the type of violation, it is essential that you call an experienced SEC enforcement attorney at the latest upon receipt of a “come hither” letter.

Stanley C. Morris is a former Senior SEC Enforcement attorney and his practice includes representation of public and private companies and individuals in investigations and civil lawsuits brought by the enforcement divisions of the SEC, NASD and California Department of Corporations. His practice also includes broker-dealer customer arbitrations, compliance matters, internal investigations and securities transactions. Mr. Morris serves as a member of the NASD Regulation, Inc. Board of Arbitrators



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/4/2003 3:38:46 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
no easy way out for you Goelo:

SEC Redefines Injunction Policy
Agreeing to Order Is Viewed as Admitting
To Charges Despite Settlement Wording
By DEBORAH SOLOMON
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

WASHINGTON -- The Securities and Exchange Commission has quietly changed the way it views people who settle charges with the regulator and don't admit or deny guilt.

Some securities lawyers said the new policy could make it more difficult to get defendants to agree to settle cases.

In the opinion, issued late last month, the SEC said defendants who agree to injunctive orders will essentially be seen by the agency as having admitted to the charges, despite standard settlement language in which defendants neither admit nor deny the allegations. As part of the policy change, defendants who agree to a court-ordered injunction won't be permitted to deny the SEC's charges in any "follow-on" proceedings at the agency.

The SEC's move will make it tougher for defendants to avoid later disciplinary actions by the commission. When defendants agree to an injunction they are usually subject to other disciplinary moves, such as license revocation for broker-dealers or suspended registrations for investment advisers.

In its opinion, the SEC said it is usually "in the public interest" to take disciplinary actions -- such as a license revocation or registration suspension -- against defendants who agree to antifraud injunctions settling civil charges. Defendants can argue against disciplinary actions, but they can't challenge facts contained in a settlement to which they already have agreed.

"If you engage in conduct that results in you being enjoined, the commission's general conclusion is going to be that's enough to support barring you from engaging in the securities business," said Barry Barbash, a Washington, D.C., attorney and the former head of the SEC's investment-management division.

The SEC's move is part of a broad effort by the agency to impose tougher sanctions on defendants and speed up enforcement cases that come before the commission. SEC commissioners and staff want to make sure settlements include a degree of punishment serious enough to serve as a deterrent against future violations.

While the SEC is trying to get tough on fraud, some securities lawyers said the new policy could make it tougher for the agency to obtain settlements. Getting agreements is key for the SEC, which doesn't have the resources or staff to try the more than 500 enforcement cases it files each year.

Most settlements include standard language in which the defendant doesn't admit or deny the allegations -- something defense lawyers insist on because it helps protect clients against third-party lawsuits. If the SEC chips away at the ability to not admit or deny the allegations, defense lawyers said it will be harder for them to agree to settle cases.

David Gourevitch, a New York attorney and former SEC enforcement lawyer, said the commission's new policy "will create a significant disincentive to settle because it strips the defendant of his right to put forth a defense in any follow-on disciplinary proceeding."

Other defense attorneys said the policy is hypocritical. "They cannot encourage settlements by assuring parties that the settlement won't be used against them as an admission and at the same time use it themselves in a future proceeding as an admission," said Seth Taube, a New Jersey attorney and former SEC enforcement lawyer.

The five-member commission had become concerned that too many defendants were challenging the SEC's allegations in disciplinary proceedings, forcing the enforcement staff to prove the charges to an administrative law judge. That took time and energy away from pursuing other cases, SEC officials said.

In the past, defendants could go before an administrative law judge and challenge the underlying factual assertion in the SEC's complaint. The new policy, said Mr. Barbash, "takes away your ability to challenge the allegation. By signing the consent decree, you're essentially saying you agree not to raise the issue."

Write to Deborah Solomon at deborah.solomon@wsj.com

Updated August 4, 2003 12:40 a.m.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/4/2003 8:09:17 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
US SEC recasts "neither admit nor deny" agreements

By Kevin Drawbaugh

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's crackdown on corporate crime is leading the agency to view defendants as having admitted the facts in a settlement, even where the accused "neither admit nor deny wrongdoing."

In a July 25 order, the market regulator said that defendants agreeing to be enjoined from illegal activity, while neither admitting nor denying wrongdoing, may not dispute the facts of follow-on SEC administrative proceedings.

That means a brokerage, for instance, that agrees to a court injunction against committing fraud, even if it does not admit to fraud, may not contest the facts in further actions brought by the SEC in connection with the injunction.

Such administrative actions might include revoking the license of a broker-dealer, suspending an investment adviser's registration, or barring an individual from working as an auditor, officer or director of a publicly traded company.

"It will make regulated individuals and entities think twice before settling, but I don't believe that it will prevent the SEC from being able to negotiate settlements," said Jack Sylvia, a partner at the law firm of Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo in Boston.

An SEC spokesman declined to comment and referred inquiries to the language of the July 25 commission order.

In the aftermath of a string of scandals in corporate America, the SEC has been slapping defendants with higher penalties and trying to speed its handling of such cases.

The "neither admit nor deny" convention has long been employed in SEC settlements. When paired with an injunction, the legal convention gives the SEC a way to halt future abuses without a costly, time-consuming court trial. At the same time, it lets a defendant end an SEC probe without an admission of guilt that could weaken its position in future legal actions.

As convenient as "neither admit nor deny" has been for the SEC, lawyers said, it may no longer be viewed as adequate, with the SEC hiring more lawyers and gaining new powers from a Congress seemingly intent on busting white-collar criminals.

Some lawyers said the new SEC policy could reduce the number of settlements and lead to more court fights.

"The practical meaning is there are going to be fewer settlements with the SEC. If they want to litigate the cases, then the bar is going to litigate them," said Ira Lee Sorkin, a partner at the law firm of Carter Ledyard and Milburn in New York and a former SEC official and federal prosecutor.

08/04/03 18:41 ET

Copyright 2003 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/5/2003 2:15:52 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
More SEC cases end up in court

By Robert Schmidt
Bloomberg News

WASHINGTON — The number of defendants fighting, instead of settling, charges brought by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has jumped 26 percent in the past two years as the agency seeks stiffer penalties, SEC officials said yesterday.

This growing tendency of defendants to battle charges in court could stretch the SEC's resources and lead the agency to curtail investigations of new frauds even as Congress expands the SEC's budget, securities lawyers said.

"The more litigation, the SEC runs the risk it will be rerouting resources from the investigative to the trial mode," said former SEC enforcement director Stanley Sporkin, now a securities attorney at Weil, Gotshal & Manges in Washington, D.C.

The increased litigation follows demands from Congress and the SEC's five commissioners for tougher sanctions after accounting scandals at Enron and WorldCom, officials said. As the SEC seeks to bar more defendants from serving as corporate officers and insists they pay settlements out of their own pockets, more defendants are fighting the charges.

"We are much better off getting accountability and deterrence as opposed to taking settlements that wouldn't produce that effect," said SEC Commissioner Harvey Goldschmid. "What we're doing is very much in the public interest."

Pattern changes


The SEC's enforcement division, which is conducting more than 2,000 investigations, has traditionally settled most cases it brings because it has lacked the personnel and money to take a large number of cases to court. The percentage of contested cases has been rising.

For the first six months of fiscal year 2003, which began Oct. 1, 2002, defendants challenged the SEC in 118 cases out of the 277 that were filed, or in 43 percent of the cases, SEC records show. In fiscal 2002, which started Oct. 1, 2001, the percentage also was 43 percent, with defendants litigating 247 cases out of a total of 570 brought by the SEC that year.




In fiscal year 2001, which ended Sept. 30, 2001, just before the Enron scandal erupted, defendants contested SEC charges 34 percent of the time, in 155 cases out of the 453 that were filed. The jump to 43 percent from 34 percent marks a 26 percent increase.

The SEC statistics define litigated cases as ones in which a settlement is not filed at the same time as the charges. These cases include matters handled both in federal court and in the agency's in-house judicial system. Cases are counted as litigated when one defendant fights the charges although other defendants might settle.

Stiffer penalties


The SEC's demands for stiffer penalties were driven by public outrage over accounting scandals as well as last year's Sarbanes-Oxley corporate-governance law, which ratcheted up penalties for corporate crimes.

"After Enron, WorldCom and Sarbanes-Oxley, there was definitely a feeling that the sanctions had to be tougher," leaving the SEC's resources stretched, said SEC chief litigation counsel David Kornblau.

"Particularly at the end of last year and the beginning of this year, we were quite strained."

Among disputed cases filed this year by the SEC are insider-trading charges against Martha Stewart, former chief executive officer of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, and securities-fraud charges against Henry Yuen, former CEO of Gemstar-TV Guide International.

Court risk


Richard Sauer, a former SEC enforcement lawyer, said defendants are more likely to go to court if the agency's settlement terms continue to be so strict, especially when the SEC seeks to bar executives from serving as corporate officers and directors.

"You're affecting people's ability to remain in their professions and to earn a livelihood, and people who have the wherewithal to fight are often inclined to do so," said Sauer, now a partner at Vinson & Elkins in Washington, D.C.

In the current fiscal year, Congress boosted the SEC's budget by 63 percent to $716 million, although the SEC has been unable to spend $103 million of its budget because of slower than expected hiring. The House Appropriations Committee has proposed using the leftover money to help fund the SEC's $841.5 million budget for fiscal year 2004, which begins Oct. 1.

Kornblau, who heads a team of 30 trial specialists at the SEC's headquarters, said he is counting on the agency's increased budget to help alleviate the strain of the growing number of litigated cases. The agency has recently hired three trial attorneys and has plans to hire four more, he said.

"Litigation is quite time consuming and labor intensive, and that's I think in part what Congress recognized" in increasing the SEC's budget, Kornblau said.

Peter Derby, an SEC managing executive, told Congress last month that the SEC would complete hiring about 800 people by the end of this year.

Kornblau said the percentage of contested cases might slip back to recent historical levels if defense attorneys discover they can't win reduced penalties for their clients.


Copyright © 2003 The Seattle Times Company



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/5/2003 10:47:04 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Former Stan Lee Media executive sentenced
Associated Press
Posted on Tue, Aug. 05, 2003

LOS ANGELES - A former vice president of defunct Internet entertainment company Stan Lee Media Inc. was sentenced to six and a half years in federal prison for his role in a stock price manipulation scam.

Stephen Gordon was convicted in December of wire and bank fraud charges in connection with the check-kiting scheme that ruined the company and bilked millions from banks and brokerage houses.

Also convicted was Gordon's brother, Jonathan, a former Merrill Lynch financial consultant was to be sentenced Tuesday.

The scam involved writing bad checks on margin accounts for Stan Lee Media stock, named after famed Marvel Comics writer Stan Lee.

Gordon told U.S. District Judge A. Howard Matz that Stan Lee Media co-founder Peter Paul was to blame.

"I thought I was dealing with legitimate people," Gordon said, in an hour-long speech to the judge. "I was an idiot and I listened to people that I thought knew more than me."

Paul, who was arrested in Brazil, is awaiting extradition while facing charges in the scheme.

Gordon was ordered to pay $5.6 million in restitution to brokerage firm Spear Leeds & Kellogg. The judge also ordered both brothers to pay $1.2 million to US Bank.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/7/2003 9:18:37 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Crooks Off The Hook

William Greider is a national affairs correspondent for The Nation magazine, and author of One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism.

The $300 million Enron "settlement" government regulators worked out with the nation's two largest banks smells so bad that even The Wall Street Journal editorial writers gagged on the rank odor. What Citigroup and JP Morgan Chase did, remember, was to design the funny-money financial deals that directly pumped up Enron's profits and stock price. When Enron's fraudulent scheme unraveled and the stock collapsed, the nation's pension funds lost somewhere between $25 to $50 billion. And these two famous banks each profited mightily from their role as financial architects of the great swindle. The pay-up costs will not even require an asterisk on their balance sheets.


Liberal Democrats might have to acknowledge that New Deal financial-regulatory reforms have largely failed.



"Bank fraud" is a legal term of art. It means if you were one of those savings and loan hustlers who got nailed in the 1980s S&L crisis, you might go to jail. You would at least be financially ruined in the unwinding. If your name is Sandy Weill of Citigroup or one of those patrician bankers at Chase, the merged Morgan-Rockefeller institution, forget about it. Citi executives at least had the decency to say they felt sorry. The men of Morgan -- stiff upper lips, gentlemen -- "neither admitted nor denied the SEC's allegations."

Where is the outrage? This settlement was not a "warning shot to banks," as The New York Times claimed. It was the impotent whimper of a toothless government. The prosecutors and SEC regulators expressed complete confidence that both of these banks were expressly aware of the fraud they were helping to commit. As evidence, the lawmen cited a 1998 e-mail from a Morgan executive: "Enron loves these deals as they are able to hide funded debt from their equity analysts because they (at the very least) book it as deferred revenue or (better yet) bury it in their trading liabilities."

Yet the fraud case, the government concluded, was too weak to pursue. In truth, they are probably correct (though seeking indictments would have been a therapeutic exercise). It could have helped even more if the failed prosecutors, instead of lamely claiming victory, had explained forthrightly why and how the law more or less guarantees that the biggest, most esteemed crooks will get off the hook. The corruption of law is the core scandal here. It suffuses American capitalism and American politics, too.

Banking laws are not handed down from Hammurabi. They are far more likely to be written -- no surprise -- by the lawyers and lobbyists who work for people like Sandy Weill. The legal definitions for criminal fraud, or the thresholds of evidence required to impose personal and institutional liability on bankers and banks, are shaped and massaged by the very folks who might someday stand at risk. For that matter, so are the fictitious distinctions embedded in corporate accounting and the tax code that allow the Enrons to manipulate and swindle -- doing magical deals designed by their financiers that turn new debt into revenue and create fictional profit from real loss.

There are now many Enrons -- more seem to surface everyday -- and we can count on sophisticated high-stakes fraud as a permanent feature of American capitalism so long as the corporate-financial suits write the laws governing their own behavior. I repeat: Where is the anger? In the last three years, we have experienced one of the largest corporate scandals in U.S. history and certainly the most costly since investors large and small lost several trillion dollars in the meltdown of false expectations. In Washington, aside from a few brave voices, all one hears are self-congratulations for the pale "reform" measures that are allegedly meant to restore faith in the stock market and corporate management. Democrats have gone mute on the matter. Republicans worry that "reform" went too far.

But the smoldering anger persists across the country among millions of citizens who at least know what they lost personally. Is there a political party bold enough to turn this hurt and resentment into a red-hot political issue? To clean up this mess, conscientious lawmakers would have to dig deeper into the fraudulent legal distinctions protecting prestigious swindlers and ask larger questions about the functional realities of business and finance. Liberal Democrats might have to acknowledge that the great financial-regulatory reforms enacted by the New Deal, including the SEC, have largely failed in their purpose. The same scandals persist across decades, the victims are the same hapless investors. There is not much appetite in Congress to take on such weighty matters, especially during the fund-raising season for the next election.

But who knows, maybe there is a presidential candidate among the Democrats brave enough to try. He or she would not have to describe legal remedies for all of the obvious loopholes and snares. It would suffice if someone makes a serious commitment to reexamining the origins of systemic fraud and standard assumptions about how capitalism functions, and then promise to launch a serious independent investigation of why such scandals are recurring in the economic system. Asking big fundamental questions is high risk but, who knows, it might wake up some voters.


Click here to subscribe to our free e-mail dispatch and get the latest on what's new at TomPaine.com before everyone else! You can unsubscribe at any time and we will never distribute your information to any other entity.





Published: Aug 07 2003



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/8/2003 1:41:02 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
UT-OH GOELO, SOUNDS JUST LIKE YOUR DILEMMA:

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 18279 \ August 8, 2003
UNITED STATES v. CONRAD DIAZ, Crim. No. SA-03-183 (USDC CD Cal)
The Commission announced that on August 6, 2003 Conrad Diaz ("Diaz") was indicted on two counts of making false statements to the Commission in a Form 10-QSB filed by Tradamax Group, Inc., formerly of Newport Beach, California. The indictment was based upon the facts in the Commission's civil action against Tradamax, its control person, Pattinson Hayton ("Hayton"), and Diaz. Diaz was formerly the chief financial officer of Tradamax.

The Commission's complaint alleged that Hayton, Tradamax and Diaz made numerous fraudulent public statements regarding: (1) the control of Tradamax by Pattinson Hayton, a recidivist securities law violator; (2) the identity of Tradamax's chief executive officer; and (3) the company's business. On August 9, 2002, the Honorable Gary L. Taylor, United States District Judge, entered final judgments of permanent injunction, by consent, against Tradamax and Diaz. Subsequently, Judge Taylor entered a final judgment of permanent injunction by default against Pattinson Hayton.

For more information, see Litigation Release Nos. 17873 (December 3, 2002), 17677 (August 13, 2002), 17046 (June 21, 2001) and 17061 (July 5, 2001).



sec.gov 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 08/08/2003



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/8/2003 3:14:59 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
BTW FRANCOIS, DID YOU EVER RECOVER THE SWINDLED MONEY THAT THAT GUY HARRIS CROOKED FROM YOU IN THAT PP?

CONRAD DIAZ INDICTED FOR MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS IN TRADAMAX GROUP, INC. FORM
10-QSB

The Commission announced that on August 6 Conrad Diaz (Diaz) was
indicted on two counts of making false statements to the Commission in a
Form 10-QSB filed by Tradamax Group, Inc., formerly of Newport Beach,
California. The indictment was based upon the facts in the Commission's
civil action against Tradamax, its control person, Pattinson Hayton
(Hayton), and Diaz. Diaz was formerly the chief financial officer of
Tradamax.

The Commission's complaint alleged that Hayton, Tradamax and Diaz made
numerous fraudulent public statements regarding: (1) the control of
Tradamax by Pattinson Hayton, a recidivist securities law violator; (2)
the identity of Tradamax's chief executive officer; and (3) the
company's business. On Aug. 9, 2002, the Honorable Gary L. Taylor, U.S.
District Judge, entered final judgments of permanent injunction, by
consent, against Tradamax and Diaz. Subsequently, Judge Taylor entered a
final judgment of permanent injunction by default against Pattinson
Hayton.

For more information, see Litigation Release Nos. 17873 (Dec. 3, 2002),
17677 (Aug. 13, 2002), 17046 (June 21, 2001) and 17061 (July 5, 2001).
[U.S. v. Conrad Diaz, Crim. No. SA-03-183, USDC CD Cal.] (LR-18279)



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/12/2003 6:09:40 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
8/03 RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Francois Goelo on 7/16/03 ( no pgs: 3) (jimh) [Entry date 07/29/03]"

U.S. District Court

for the Southern District of Ohio (Columbus)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 03-CV-326

United States Sec v. Sierra Brokerage, et al

Filed: 04/11/03
Assigned to: Judge John D. Holschuh
Jury demand: Defendant
Referred to: Mag. Judge Mark R. Abel
Demand: $0,000
Nature of Suit: 850
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: US Plaintiff
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 15:77 Securities Fraud



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND Tracy W Lo
EXCHANGE COMMISSION [COR LD NTC]
plaintiff Securities & Exchange
Commission
Midwest Regional Office
175 W Jackson Boulevard
Suite 900
Chicago, IL 60604-2615
312-353-7390
FTS 353-7398

Amy S Cotter
[COR LD NTC]
175 W Jackson
Suite 900
Chicago, IL 60604

v.

SIERRA BROKERAGE SERVICES INC, Sierra Brokerage Services Inc
c/o Jeffery A Richardson [COR LD NTC] [PRO SE]
President 2000 Bethel Road
defendant Columbus, OH 43220

RICHARD GEIGER Richard Geiger
defendant [COR LD NTC] [PRO SE]
66 Waldheim Road
Morton, IL 61550

JEFFREY A RICHARDSON Jeffrey A Richardson
defendant [COR LD NTC] [PRO SE]
4378 Hickory Wood Drive
Columbus, OH 43228

AARON TSAI Ronald E DePetris
defendant [COR LD NTC]
unknown

Frederick Morris Luper
(614) 221-7663
[COR LD NTC]
Luper Neidenthal & Logan - 2
50 West Broad Street
Suite 1200
Columbus, OH 43215
(614) 221-7663

Aaron Tsai
[COR LD NTC] [PRO SE]
17 N. Governor St
Evansville, IN 47711

MICHAEL M MARKOW S Lee Terry, Jr
defendant 303-892-7484
[COR LD NTC]
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP - 2
1550 Seventeenth Street
Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202
303-892-9400
FTS 893-1379

GLOBAL GUARANTEE CORPORATION S Lee Terry, Jr
defendant (See above)
[COR LD NTC]

FRANCOIS GOELO Francois Goelo
defendant [COR LD NTC] [PRO SE]
PO Box 10910
Grand Cayman,,
Cayman Isl

YONGZHI YANG Richard Wayne Ross
defendant [COR LD NTC]
Means Bichimer Burkholder &
Baker - 2
2006 Kenny Road
Columbus, OH 43221-3502
614-485-2010
FTS 485-2019

Irving M Einhorn

[COR LD NTC]
Law Offices of Irvin M Einhorn
South Tower
1601 Cloverfield Boulevard
2nd Floor
Santa Monica, CA 90404-1151
310-460-3551
FTS 798-5910

K&J CONSULTING, c/o Yongzhi Irving M Einhorn
Yang (See above)
defendant [COR LD NTC]

KE LUO Irving M Einhorn
defendant (See above)
[COR LD NTC]

Benjamin Brian Segel
[COR LD NTC]
445 Hutchinson Avenue
Suite 800
Columbus, OH 43235
614-785-6461
FTS 760-0177

M&M MANAGEMENT LTD, c/o Ke Luo Irving M Einhorn
defendant (See above)
[COR LD NTC]

Benjamin Brian Segel
(See above)
[COR LD NTC]

JEROME B ARMSTRONG Irving M Einhorn
defendant (See above)
[COR LD NTC]





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


DOCKET PROCEEDINGS


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE # DOCKET ENTRY



4/11/03 1 COMPLAINT (referred to Mag. Judge Mark R. Abel ) ( no.
pgs: 31) (sln) [Entry date 04/14/03]

4/11/03 2 MOTION by plt for admission of attorney Cotter & Lo pro
hac vice ( no pgs: 3) (fee waived) (sln)
[Entry date 04/14/03]

4/11/03 -- Summons issued as to all dfts' (sln) [Entry date 04/14/03]

4/15/03 3 ORDER by Mag. Judge Mark R. Abel granting motion for
admission of attorney Cotter & Lo pro hac vice [2-1] (cc:
all counsel) ( no pgs: 1) (jc) [Entry date 04/16/03]

5/1/03 -- Mail Returned [3-1] addressed to Amy S Cotter for plaintiff
United States Sec (jc) [Entry date 05/08/03]

5/5/03 4 MOTION by defendant Jerome B Armstrong for appointment of
counsel ( no pgs: 1) (jc) [Entry date 05/08/03]

5/29/03 5 Wavier of Service executed upon defendant Sierra Brokerage,
defendant Richard Geiger, defendant Jeffrey A Richardson,
defendant Michael M Markow, defendant Global Guarantee,
defendant Yongzhi Yang, defendant K&J Consulting, defendant
Ke Luo, defendant M&M Management Ltd, defendant Jerome B
Armstrong on 4/16/03 ( no pgs: 20) (jc)
[Entry date 05/30/03]

6/5/03 6 MOTION for admission of attorney Irving Einhorn. for defts
Yang, K and K, Luo, and M and M Management. pro hac vice (
no pgs: 3) (jc) [Entry date 06/09/03]

6/11/03 7 ORDER by Mag. Judge Mark R. Abel granting motion for
admission of attorney Irving Einhorn. for defts Yang, K and
K, Luo, and M and M Management. pro hac vice [6-1] (cc:
all counsel) ( no pgs: 1) (jc) [Entry date 06/12/03]

6/13/03 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE mailed to defendant Aaron Tsai on
4/23/03 Answer due on 6/22/03 for Aaron Tsai ( no pgs: 2)
(pl) [Entry date 06/14/03]

6/13/03 9 ANSWER by defendant Yongzhi Yang, defendant K&J Consulting
( no pgs: 23) (jimh) [Entry date 06/16/03]

6/13/03 10 ANSWER by defendant Ke Luo, defendant M&M Management Ltd (
no pgs: 26) (jimh) [Entry date 06/16/03]

6/19/03 -- Mail Returned [7-1] addressed to Sierra Brokerage for
defendant Sierra Brokerage, no current address in file (jimh)
[Entry date 06/24/03]

6/23/03 11 NOTICE by defendant Ke Luo, defendant M&M Management Ltd
of change of address for atty ( no pgs: 2) (jimh)
[Entry date 06/27/03]

7/3/03 12 ANSWER by defendant Jeffrey A Richardson ( no pgs: 21) (pl)
[Entry date 07/03/03]

7/17/03 13 MOTION by defendant Michael M Markow, defendant Global
Guarantee for an approvalto extend time to 8/8/2003, to
move or plead ( no pgs: 3 + exh) (jimh)
[Entry date 07/21/03]

7/24/03 14 ORDER by Mag. Judge Mark R. Abel granting motion to
extend time to 8/8/2003 to move or plead [13-1] (cc: all
counsel) ( no pgs: 1) (sh) [Entry date 07/25/03]
[Edit date 07/28/03]

7/28/03 15 RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Francois Goelo
on 7/16/03 ( no pgs: 3) (jimh) [Entry date 07/29/03]

8/1/03 -- Mail Returned [14-1] addressed to Sierra Brokerage for
defendant Sierra Brokerage (jimh) [Entry date 08/06/03]

8/5/03 16 NOTICE of hearing ; Settlement conference set at 9:00 on
10/7/03 (cc: all counsel) (jimh) [Entry date 08/06/03]

8/5/03 17 MOTION by dft Aaron Tsai for admission of attorney Ronald
DePetris pro hac vice ( no pgs: 3) (fee paid) (sln)
[Entry date 08/07/03]

8/6/03 18 ANSWER by dft Aaron Tsai; jury demand ( no pgs: 9) (sln)
[Entry date 08/07/03]

8/6/03 19 MOTION by dft Aaron Tsai to extend time to answer ( no
pgs: 4) (sln) [Entry date 08/07/03]



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/12/2003 6:11:15 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
C. Serving Process
An Initiating State may ask for the assistance of a IV-D agency in another State to serve process (the child support summons, complaint, petition, motion, etc.) in that State. The Responding State will find the appropriate process server (staff, private company, sheriff, constable, etc.) and ensure that the papers are served. Once service is accomplished, a proof or return of service is sent to the Initiating State to show that the papers were served according to the laws of the Responding State.

The Initiating State may require more stringent proof that the individual received the papers. For instance, in many States it is sufficient to leave the papers with someone over the age of 18 at the individual's residence. An Initiating State: 1) may have the same law; 2) will accept proof of service if it shows that the service standards of the other State were met even if different from its own; or 3) require that the process server hand the papers to the individual him- or herself.

If the Initiating State's service requirements are more stringent than those of the Responding State, it is important to let the Responding State know of the requirement so that the process server serves according to the laws of the Initiating State. In the case where actual service is required, the return of service should indicate that the papers were served on the individual him- or herself. The service of process required by the Initiating State's laws will govern whether the service method was sufficient and whether the return of service information is adequate proof of appropriate service.

Special attention should be given to serving process on a military base or ship, on tribal lands or internationally.[53] Check with a specialist for that particular area for the best way to proceed.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/12/2003 6:32:14 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
JOHN POWELL, MOVIE PRODUCER AND FORMER STOCKBROKER, INDICTED FOR LYING TO THE
SEC

On August 5, a federal grand jury indicted John R. Powell, former
President of Irvine Securities, Inc. and currently a movie producer, for
making false statements to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
indictment charges Powell with making false statements to a federal
agency and obstruction of justice. The indictment alleges that during
2002, the Commission proposed settling a civil case filed by the
Commission against Powell and others. During the course of settlement
discussions, the Commission staff stated that it would consider waiving
a portion of the proposed amount of disgorgement and an additional money
penalty if Powell was unable to pay the full amount. The Commission
required Powell to submit sworn financial statements demonstrating his
inability to pay. Powell submitted two sworn financial statements,
dated January 2002 and July 2002.

The indictment alleges that in each of the financial statements, Powell
claimed he had a negative net worth and that he had no equity in his
Laguna Beach house because his mortgage was essentially equal to the
property's "quick sale" market value. The indictment further alleges
that Powell, in fact, knew at the time he submitted the January 2002
financial statements that his residence had been appraised at a value of
over $3 million, that a mortgage lender would loan him at least
$1,750,000 against the property, and that he had at least $500,000 in
equity in the property. In Powell's July 2002 financial statements
submitted to the Commission, Powell did not disclose that he had
refinanced his house in February 2002 to withdraw more than $428,000 in
cash from the property. Nor did the financial statements disclose that
Powell deposited this money directly into a bank account in the name of
a film production company that Powell owned and controlled. Powell
subsequently wrote checks on this bank account to pay for his monthly
mortgage payments and other living expenses.

On Oct. 10, 2002, in an action brought by the Commission, the U.S.
District Court for the Central District of California entered an
injunction prohibiting Powell from violating the securities registration
and antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws, Sections 5(a),
5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5. For more information,
see Litigation Release Nos. 18182 (June 9, 2003), and 15822 (July 29,
1998).

The criminal case is being prosecuted by the United States Attorney's
Office for the Central District of California. [U.S. v. John R.
Powell, Criminal Case No. CR 03-782, CD Cal.] (LR-18281)



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/12/2003 10:21:15 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
RECOGNIZE THAT NAME JAMES FARRELL FROM Z8 LIST OF CRIMS GOELO? YOU SHOULD. ONE BY ONE WE SHALL REJOICE AT THE FINAL VINDICATION!!

Five indicted in Las Vegas securities fraud scheme

ASSOCIATED PRESS
8/9/2003 11:29 pm LAS VEGAS (AP) — Five people, including two Las Vegas attorneys and a former New York lawyer linked to the sale of FBI documents in 2001, have been indicted in a multimillion dollar securities fraud scheme, authorities said Friday.

A 64-count federal indictment unsealed Thursday charges Las Vegas attorneys Sean Flanagan, 35, and Daniel Chapman, 49; former New York attorney Herbert Jacobi, 63; disbarred Las Vegas lawyer Shawn Hackman, 35; and James Farrell, 54, a stock transfer agent from Salt Lake City.

Authorities said the various schemes involving the group and others netted at least $14 million. An investigation is ongoing to determine the exact loss amount. The men are charged with numerous counts, including mail fraud, securities fraud, money laundering and racketeering.

The indictment alleges Flanagan, Chapman, Hackman and Jacobi took over schemes begun in the early 1990s by Las Vegas businessman Peter Berney, who is awaiting sentencing in a related case.

“Corporate records were fabricated and documents were backdated to create the illusion that securities were issued in compliance with federal securities laws,” the indictment said.

Authorities said the group formed shell corporations and arranged for them to merge with private companies. Another Las Vegas businessman, Robert Potter, allegedly anchored the scheme with Jacobi. Potter was indicted in 2001 in Berney’s alleged scheme.

Farrell is accused of using his company, Alpha Tech Stock Transfer, to transfer the stocks. Among shell corporations officials named Friday were Professional Mining Consultants and K-9 Protection Inc.

Farrell was arrested Friday morning in Salt Lake City and authorities have issued summonses for the other defendants. All are scheduled to appear Sept. 5 in U.S. District Court in Las Vegas.

Jacobi and Potter were key figures in a 2001 case involving the sale of documents stolen from the Las Vegas FBI office.

Both later pleaded guilty in New York to charges that they conspired to receive stolen FBI records pertaining to the fraud investigation.

At a news conference Friday, officials said 20 people involved in the schemes have been charged.

A message left at the law offices of Chapman and Flanagan was not immediately returned. The identities of the lawyers representing the five men could not immediately be determined.

Daniel Bogden, U.S. attorney for Nevada, called prosecuting securities fraud a priority in the state.

He said a corporate fraud task force of state, local and federal law enforcement agencies including the FBI, the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the IRS and the U.S. Postal Service has been investigating false reporting of income, insider trading and securities fraud.

“The growth of business in the corporate area has been amazing,” Bogden said. “In 2002 alone, we saw 34,000 new corporate filings and while that growth is good for business, there are often one or two bad apples that cause corporate fraud.”



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/12/2003 10:38:28 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
OH MY FRANCOIS GOELO, DOES IT GET BETTER THAT THIS FOR THETRUTHSEEKER AND FRIENDS?. SHAWN F. HACKMAN IN THE BLUEPOINT SEC FILINGS. COULD YOUR CREW HAVE PICKED A BETTER MOST RECETLY INDICTED ATTORNEY FOR A LEGAL OPINION FOR YOUR ONE BIG SCAM?


Bluepoint Linux Software Corp · S-8 · On 12/15/0 · EX-5
SEC File 333-51890 · Accession Number 1058985-0-264

EX-5 · Opinion re: Legality

Shawn F. Hackman, a P.C.
3360 West Sahara Avenue
Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89102
(702) 732-2253

=================================

Five indicted in Las Vegas securities fraud scheme

ASSOCIATED PRESS
8/9/2003 11:29 pm LAS VEGAS (AP) — Five people, including two Las Vegas attorneys and a former New York lawyer linked to the sale of FBI documents in 2001, have been indicted in a multimillion dollar securities fraud scheme, authorities said Friday.

A 64-count federal indictment unsealed Thursday charges Las Vegas attorneys Sean Flanagan, 35, and Daniel Chapman, 49; former New York attorney Herbert Jacobi, 63; disbarred Las Vegas lawyer Shawn Hackman, 35; and James Farrell, 54, a stock transfer agent from Salt Lake City.

Authorities said the various schemes involving the group and others netted at least $14 million. An investigation is ongoing to determine the exact loss amount. The men are charged with numerous counts, including mail fraud, securities fraud, money laundering and racketeering.

The indictment alleges Flanagan, Chapman, Hackman and Jacobi took over schemes begun in the early 1990s by Las Vegas businessman Peter Berney, who is awaiting sentencing in a related case.

“Corporate records were fabricated and documents were backdated to create the illusion that securities were issued in compliance with federal securities laws,” the indictment said.

Authorities said the group formed shell corporations and arranged for them to merge with private companies. Another Las Vegas businessman, Robert Potter, allegedly anchored the scheme with Jacobi. Potter was indicted in 2001 in Berney’s alleged scheme.

Farrell is accused of using his company, Alpha Tech Stock Transfer, to transfer the stocks. Among shell corporations officials named Friday were Professional Mining Consultants and K-9 Protection Inc.

Farrell was arrested Friday morning in Salt Lake City and authorities have issued summonses for the other defendants. All are scheduled to appear Sept. 5 in U.S. District Court in Las Vegas.

Jacobi and Potter were key figures in a 2001 case involving the sale of documents stolen from the Las Vegas FBI office.

Both later pleaded guilty in New York to charges that they conspired to receive stolen FBI records pertaining to the fraud investigation.

At a news conference Friday, officials said 20 people involved in the schemes have been charged.

A message left at the law offices of Chapman and Flanagan was not immediately returned. The identities of the lawyers representing the five men could not immediately be determined.

Daniel Bogden, U.S. attorney for Nevada, called prosecuting securities fraud a priority in the state.

He said a corporate fraud task force of state, local and federal law enforcement agencies including the FBI, the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the IRS and the U.S. Postal Service has been investigating false reporting of income, insider trading and securities fraud.

“The growth of business in the corporate area has been amazing,” Bogden said. “In 2002 alone, we saw 34,000 new corporate filings and while that growth is good for business, there are often one or two bad apples that cause corporate fraud.”



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/13/2003 8:43:29 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
GOELO, THERE IS THAT BLUEPOINT ATTORNEY SHAWN HACKMAN MENTIONED AGAIN. DO YOU THINK INDICTMENTS COULD BE COMING YOUR WAY?

"Mr. Tanner is the third Las Vegas-linked penny stock attorney in the past year to suffer career setbacks related to dubious penny stock dealings on Howe Street, the centre of dealings for the former Vancouver Stock Exchange. Herbert Jacobi of New York, who helped notorious Canadian fraudster Michael Mitton wire illicit proceeds to Panama in the H & R Enterprises rig job, pleaded guilty a year ago to buying stolen FBI records for Mafia-linked client Robert Potter, while Shawn Hackman of Las Vegas, who provided bogus H & R share opinion letters, was suspended in December amid allegations of misappropriating more than $700,000 from a client. (Although based in New York, Mr. Jacobi operated with Las Vegas penny stock law firm Chapman & Flanagan.)"


BCSC-aided SEC fines Maid Aide rigger $378,000 (U.S.)

2002-10-21 08:51 PT - Street Wire
by Brent Mudry

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission has won $378,000 in combined fines against the supervisor of a notorious New York boiler room brokerage in the Maid Aide case, a 1998-1999 penny stock bribed-broker rig job which featured controversial Vancouver brokerage Pacific International Securities as a stock and money laundering conduit for dubious offshore dealings. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) The penalties against Michael Boston, 28, of Woodside, N.Y., bring the total Maid Aide fine tally to $11.8-million.

The SEC announced Thursday that it was granted a default judgment against Mr. Boston by Judge William Pauley of United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on Oct. 10, and earlier judgments against two other key defendants: Pacific International client Max C. Tanner and Dennis Evans, both of Las Vegas.

The Maid Aide case has been probed by the SEC, the British Columbia Securities Commission, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and NASD Regulation Inc., the regulatory arm of the National Association of Securities Dealers. "The BCSC was extremely useful in facilitating getting records from Canadian broker-dealers. They responded so quickly it was almost instantaneous," Caren Pennington, assistant regional director for the SEC's Northeast region, told Stockwatch.

In the Maid Aide criminal case, Mr. Tanner, a Nevada lawyer, was convicted of 37 counts of securities fraud, mail, wire and tax fraud, and money laundering, in November, 2001, while Mr. Evans was convicted of securities fraud. (Mr. Tanner's money laundering conviction relates to his offshore Pacific International dealings.) In the SEC case, Mr. Tanner and Mr. Evans were given lifetime bans from serving as an officer or director of a public company. The other three defendants in the criminal case were all convicted as well.

Mr. Boston, who ran one of two New York branches of Baxter Banks & Smith flogging Maid Aide shares, with co-defendant Kevin J. Ruggiero, was ordered to pay the SEC $150,000 in disgorgement, $53,745 in prejudgment interest and a $175,000 civil penalty. Baxter Banks, which used unregistered boiler room salesmen to sell Maid Aide shares, was shut down in April, 2000, when its licence was permanently revoked by the State of Florida's Department of Banking and Finance.

The Boston judgment comes just after the start of a prosecution of Pacific International Securities in Vancouver by the BCSC. The Canadian regulator claims P.I. attracted, serviced and catered to much more than its Howe Street share of U.S. stock crooks, including such notable securities violators and felons as Shalom Weiss, recently extradited from Austria to Florida after fleeing an 845-year prison sentence, Mafia associates Phil Abramo and Phil Gurian, serial stock manipulator Barclay Davis and a cast of other rogues. Although Pacific International has not yet fully unveiled its defence, it blames the BCSC for failing to stem or reverse the constant stream of dirty clients to the brokerage.

While the criminal indictment detailed Mr. Tanner's use of a Pacific International account in the name of Delta Financial Resources Inc., his offshore Cayman Islands company, the SEC complaint reveals two other Maid Aide riggers used offshore accounts at a Canadian brokerage. Mr. Taylor controlled a Canadian brokerage account in the name of Gold Coast Investments S.A., in the exclusive offshore enclave of Alofi, Niue, while Mr. Ruggiero controlled a Canadian account in the name of Chios Investments Ltd., registered in the exotic offshore enclave of Gibraltar. While both accounts were believed to have used brokerages in Vancouver, it is not known whether P.I., or another local house, was used.

In an unrelated action, the Investment Dealers Association of Canada broke good news to its Canadian brokerage members on Wednesday, announcing that Niue is no longer deemed to be a serious money laundering destination by the international Financial Action Task Force. The folks at FATF have recently removed Niue, Russia, Dominica and the Marshall Islands from their blacklist of non-co-operating laundering countries.

Mr. Tanner is the third Las Vegas-linked penny stock attorney in the past year to suffer career setbacks related to dubious penny stock dealings on Howe Street, the centre of dealings for the former Vancouver Stock Exchange. Herbert Jacobi of New York, who helped notorious Canadian fraudster Michael Mitton wire illicit proceeds to Panama in the H & R Enterprises rig job, pleaded guilty a year ago to buying stolen FBI records for Mafia-linked client Robert Potter, while Shawn Hackman of Las Vegas, who provided bogus H & R share opinion letters, was suspended in December amid allegations of misappropriating more than $700,000 from a client. (Although based in New York, Mr. Jacobi operated with Las Vegas penny stock law firm Chapman & Flanagan.)



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/13/2003 8:48:31 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
GOELO, ANOTHER UNFLATTERING ARTICLE ABOUT BLUEPOINTS LEGAL OPINION ATTORNEY SHAWN HACKMAN.

STREETWIRE: SEC suspends disbarred Mitton lawyer Hackman
2002-09-12 11:19 PT - Street Wire
by Brent Mudry

Las Vegas penny stock lawyer Shawn F. Hackman, whose career highlights include writing bogus share opinion letters for notorious Canadian career fraudster Michael Mitton's H & R Enterprises, has been suspended by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC suspension, handled by the regulator's Salt Lake City office and announced Wednesday, is based on Mr. Hackman's disbarment by the Supreme Court of Nevada.

Mr. Hackman is the third Las Vegas-linked penny stock attorney in the past 11 months to destroy his career related to dubious penny stock dealings on Howe Street, the centre of dealings for the former Vancouver Stock Exchange. Herbert Jacobi of New York, who helped Mr. Mitton wire illicit proceeds to Panama in the H & R rig job, pleaded guilty last October to buying stolen FBI records for Mafia-linked client Robert Potter. In an unrelated case, Max C. Tanner of Las Vegas was convicted by a federal jury last November of securities fraud conspiracy and money laundering, stemming from his offshore trading through controversial Vancouver brokerage Pacific International Securities in the Maid Aide boiler room penny stock rig job in 1998 and 1999.

While staff with the Nevada State Bar were unable to immediately confirm or comment on Mr. Hackman's plight, records with the Supreme Court of Nevada show the dirty Las Vegas lawyer was ordered disbarred on April 3. Mr. Hackman had been temporarily suspended by the state court on Dec. 4, 2001, on the request of the state bar's Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board.

Mr. Hackman was disbarred for misappropriating more than $700,000 in client funds at a time when he was ostensibly co-operating with state bar counsel regarding other client complaints of misappropriation. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) "We conclude that the documents before us demonstrate that Hackman poses a substantial threat of serious harm, and that his immediate temporary suspension is warranted," stated the court in its initial order.

Mr. Hackman was a key professional in the H & R debacle. (The Mitton ring's fraudulent OTC Bulletin Board promotion of H & R caused the collapse of a small upstate New York brokerage, Saperston Financial, in September, 1997, and left the clearing house unit of global mutual fund giant Fidelity Management, National Financial Services, with a $9.6-million loss.)

"Hackman was a primary participant in the manipulation scheme and facilitated the manipulation by arranging for the manipulators to reap huge profits from their scheme," stated National Financial lawsuit filed U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in September, 1997, and amended a year later.

The Fidelity unit alleged that Mr. Hackman, who had served as H & R's counsel, prepared and provided false opinion letters to help the Mitton ring clear large issuances of H & R shares in July and August, 1997. "Hackman falsely opined that the shares ... which were newly issued to the manipulators so they could sell them into the manipulated market, were exempt from registration under the United States' federal securities laws and could be issued by a transfer agent without a restrictive legend," stated National Financial.

Barely a month after the last Hackman-assisted share issuance, and with an additional two million H & R subsequently issued to Mr. Mitton's associates, H & R shares peaked and collapsed, taking Saperston, the unfortunate New York brokerage, under with it.

While these H & R fraud allegations date back four or five years, Nevada's bar took no disciplinary action, or at least no serious action, against Mr. Hackman. (Numerous new revelations about the H & R fiasco are expected when the British Columbia Securities Commission starts a hearing on the matter. A scheduling update is set for Dec. 2, with Mr. Mitton and Canaccord Capital broker Brad Scharfe as star local defendants.)

Instead, the state bar tackled Mr. Hackman amid a criminal investigation for misappropriation of client funds several years after H & R. Documents filed in court by the bar itself confirm it had serious concerns about Mr. Hackman dating back to at least August, 1999, 14 months before he met his latest alleged victim, who is now at least $700,000 poorer.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/16/2003 8:08:42 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
one by one GOELO YOU AND YOUR CROOKS WILL FALL->Jeffrey Allen Richardson (CRD #736249, Registered Principal, Columbus, Ohio)
submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent in which he was barred
from association with any NASD member in any capacity. Without admitting or
denying the allegations, Richardson consented to the described sanction and to
the entry of findings that he willfully participated in and facilitated an
unlawful, unregistered sale of shares of stock from company accounts at his
member firm to customers of another member firm through means of interstate
commerce, generating profits for his member firm. NASD found that Richardson
wired funds from the company accounts directly to a New York bank account in the
name of the stock at the instruction of a company contact. The findings also
stated that Richardson failed to conduct any inquiry as to the sources of the
shares deposited into the accounts. If he had done so, he would have discovered
that individuals were acting as underwriters or control persons in an
unregistered distribution of shares of stock on behalf of the issuer. (NASD Case
#CMS030156)



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/17/2003 8:00:54 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
SEC lays down law: Violators can't have it both ways
By JEFF BROWN
Aug. 16, 2003, 7:19PM

If you remember the book or movie All the President's Men, you may recall the "nondenial denial" the Nixon folks issued during the Watergate years.

The point of the nondenial denial was to have it both ways. If you deny the facts and are proven wrong, you're a liar on top of everything else. With a non-

denial denial, you don't admit guilt, and if the facts come back to bite you, you can at least claim you didn't lie.

The legal field is full of such things. Someone sues a company, the company agrees to a settlement and pays some money -- but doesn't concede it did anything wrong. It issues a news release saying it settled "to get the matter behind it" and to save the costs of going to court.

This kind of thing has long been a staple at the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC would accuse a company or individual of violating securities laws. The defendant agreed to an injunction barring further violations, while at the same time stating it "neither admits nor denies" that it did any such thing in the first place.

In many cases, the SEC follows up with a proceeding to seek punishment and retribution -- a big fine or ban from the securities industry, for example.

What happens next? Typically, the defendant starts fighting back. Sure, it signed the injunction, but it didn't admit or deny guilt. The shorthanded, cash-strapped SEC then has to jump through hoops to make the charges stick.

Enough. The SEC decided late last month that defendants won't be allowed to have it both ways any longer. A defendant who agrees to an injunction will be viewed as conceding the allegations.

This may sound like a legal fine point, but it's an important step in the right direction of ensuring that securities violators suffer real consequences.

Injunctions are valuable because they offer a relatively quick and streamlined way for the SEC to stop ongoing fraud. But defendants don't want to admit guilt because that would make them more vulnerable to lawsuits by investors and others. So, to get defendants to agree, the SEC has allowed injunctions to include the line about neither admitting nor denying guilt.

The new policy makes it easier for the SEC to follow injunctions with disciplinary actions.

Defendants who want to fight charges don't have to agree to the injunction. Nothing in the new policy curtails defendants' right to defend themselves.

The new policy was announced as part of an SEC order imposing punishment on a Greensboro, N.C., investment advice firm, Asset Management & Research, and its president and owner, Marshall Melton.

From mid-1994 through late 1996, Asset Management and Melton lied to investors to get them to put money into three companies Melton controlled, the SEC found. Some investors were told, for example, that they could earn 75 percent to 80 percent in the first year after putting money into one of the companies.

Investors were told that each company was separate when, in fact, funds were improperly mingled. One investor's money was used to repay a loan Melton's wife had made to shore up another Melton investment.

Defrauded investors got the SEC on the case, and on May 4, 1998, Melton and his company agreed to an injunction prohibiting them from violating antifraud laws. Although the injunction described the offenses in detail, when the SEC later began disciplinary proceedings, Melton and the company denied they'd committed those acts.

In the future, defendants won't be able to make that gambit work, the SEC says. On July 25, Melton was barred from the securities industry for life and the now-defunct Asset Management & Research was denied the right to go back into business.

Bad actors like Melton and Asset Management & Research have been gaming the system for far too long.

Kudos to the SEC.

Jeff Brown is a business columnist for the Philadelphia Inquirer. E-mail him at brownj@phillynews.com.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/17/2003 10:08:06 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
gargaro.com 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/18/2003 10:23:31 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Philadelphia Inquirer: SEC settlements have teeth now; you can't deny it
Posted on Thu, Aug. 07, 2003

On Personal Finance | SEC settlements have teeth now; you can't deny it
By Jeff Brown
Inquirer Columnist

If you remember the book or movie All the President's Men, you may recall the "non-denial denial" issued by the Nixon folks during Watergate.

The point of the non-denial denial was to have it both ways. If you deny the facts and are proved wrong, you're a liar on top of everything else. With a non-denial denial, you don't admit guilt, and if the facts come back to bite you, you can at least claim you didn't lie.

The legal field is full of such things. Someone sues a company, the company agrees to a settlement and pays some money - but doesn't concede that it did anything wrong. It issues a news release saying it settled "to get the matter behind it" and to save the costs of going to court.

This kind of thing has long been a staple at the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC would accuse a company or individual of violating securities laws. The defendant would agree to an injunction barring further violations, while at the same time stating it "neither admits nor denies" that it did any such thing in the first place.

In many cases, the SEC would follow up with a proceeding to seek punishment and retribution - a big fine or ban from the securities industry, for example.

What happens next? Typically, the defendant starts fighting back. Sure, it signed the injunction, but it didn't admit or deny guilt. The shorthanded, cash-strapped SEC then has to jump through hoops to make the charges stick.

Enough. The SEC decided last month that defendants won't be allowed to have it both ways any longer. Now, a defendant who agrees to an injunction will be viewed as conceding the allegations.

This may sound like a legal fine point, but it's an important step in the right direction of ensuring that securities violators suffer real consequences.

Injunctions are valuable because they offer a relatively quick and streamlined way for the SEC to stop fraud. But defendants don't want to admit guilt because that would make them more vulnerable to lawsuits by investors and others. So, to get defendants to agree, the SEC has allowed injunctions to include the line about neither admitting nor denying guilt.

The new policy makes it easier for the SEC to follow injunctions with disciplinary actions.

Defendants who want to fight charges don't have to agree to the injunction. Nothing in the new policy curtails defendants' right to defend themselves.

The policy was announced as part of an SEC order imposing punishment on a Greensboro, N.C., investment advice firm, Asset Management & Research Inc., and its president and owner, Marshall E. Melton.

From mid-1994 through late 1996, Asset Management and Melton lied to investors to get them to put money into three companies Melton controlled, the SEC found. One set of investors was told, for example, that they could earn 75 percent to 80 percent in the first year after putting money into one of the companies.

Investors were told that each company was separate when, in fact, invested funds were improperly mingled. One investor's money was used to repay a loan Melton's wife had made to shore up another Melton investment.

Defrauded investors got the SEC on the case, and, on May 4, 1998, Melton and his company agreed to an injunction prohibiting them from violating antifraud laws. Although the injunction described the offenses in detail, when the SEC later began disciplinary proceedings, Melton and the company denied that they had committed those acts.

In the future, defendants won't be able to make that gambit work, the SEC says. On July 25, Melton was barred from the securities industry for life, and the defunct AMR was denied the right to go back into business.

Bad actors such as Melton and AMR have been gaming the system for far too long.

Kudos to the SEC.

©1995-2003 Knight Ridder Digital, Inc. All rights reserved.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/18/2003 4:05:52 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
GOELO, YOU NOTICE HOW THEY ARE GOING AFTER CROOKS LIKE YOURSELF LATELY?

From the SEC site:

U.S.SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 18291 / August 18, 2003

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KEVIN L. LAWRENCE, STEVEN J. REIMER, MICHAEL J. CULP, LARRY L. BEAMAN, HARVEY W. KUIKEN, ALEX LACSON, AND ALFONSO LACSON, JR., Criminal Action No. CR02-260P (W.D. Wash.)

KEVIN LAWRENCE PLEADS GUILTY IN ZNETIX STOCK FRAUD

The U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Washington announced that on July 28, 2003, Kevin Leigh Lawrence, 37, of Bainbridge Island, Washington, pled guilty in federal court in Tacoma, Washington to one count of securities fraud, one count of wire fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, unlawful sale of unregistered securities, money laundering, and engaging in monetary transactions with proceeds of unlawful activity. The U.S. Attorney will recommend the imposition of a 20-year prison sentence. Sentencing is scheduled for October 31, 2003 in federal court in Seattle, Washington.

As part of his plea, Lawrence waived any right to appeal, and agreed to cooperate fully with the U.S. Attorney and the receiver appointed as part of the Securities and Exchange Commission's related case in identifying assets. Additionally, Lawrence agreed to forfeit a number of previously-seized assets. Originally indicted on July 31, 2002 in a 64-count indictment, Lawrence admitted that over the course of about 7 years he intentionally, knowingly, and willfully defrauded thousands of investors out of approximately $100 million through conspiracy and scheme to defraud involving false representations and failures to disclose accurate information in connection with the sale of the securities of Znetix, Inc., Health Maintenance Centers, Inc., Cascade Pointe, LLC, and affiliated entities. He further admitted that he intentionally, knowingly, and willfully used the funds received from investors for his own personal use and benefit and for the use and benefit of his co-conspirators and others, including for the purchase of homes, cars, boats, merchandise, and travel. Finally, he admitted that he intentionally, knowingly, and willfully made false statements and directed others to make false statements to the State of Washington's Department of Financial Institutions, Securities Division, and to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Previously, the Commission filed an emergency action on January 23, 2002, against Lawrence, as well as Znetix, Inc., Health Maintenance Centers, Inc., three related companies, their controlling executives, and several family members of Lawrence, alleging that Lawrence and other executives falsely promised investors lucrative profits from the supposedly imminent initial public offering of Znetix. Additionally, the Commission alleged that Lawrence spent more than $14 million of investor funds on personal expenses, such as luxury cars, real estate, jewelry and boats. On January 23, the Commission obtained an order freezing the assets of the defendants, and temporarily enjoining Lawrence and other controlling executives from future violations of the registration and antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. On February 15, 2002, the federal court preliminarily enjoined the defendants from such future violations and appointed a permanent receiver over the companies. Without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations, the companies, on June 6, 2002, consented to the entry of a judgment permanently enjoining them from future violations of the antifraud and securities registration provisions. Subsequently, the Commission entered into settlement agreements with relief defendants Vicki Lawrence, Stacy Gray, and Bonnie Couch, the ex-wife, fiancée and mother of Lawrence, respectively.

For more information see Litigation Release Nos. 18240 (July 21, 2003), 17664 (August 7, 2002), 17613 (July 15, 2002), 17587 (June 26, 2002), 17372 (February 21, 2002), and 17335 (January 24, 2002).

sec.gov 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/19/2003 11:31:38 AM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
Goelo, this guy likes yacht just like you.

U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 18285 / August 13, 2003
SEC OBTAINS SEIZURE OF LUXURY YACHT TO ENFORCE $21 MILLION JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT VLADISLAV STEVEN ZUBKIS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. VLADISLAV STEVEN ZUBKIS, 97 Civ. 8086 (S.D.N.Y.)

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that, on August 12, 2003, the United States Marshal's Service seized a 75-foot luxury yacht in San Diego, California, believed to belong to defendant Vladislav Steven Zubkis, as part of the Commission's efforts to enforce a $21 million securities fraud judgment against Zubkis. On August 11, the Commission obtained an emergency order from Federal District Judge John G. Koeltl in New York, without notice to Zubkis, to seize the yacht and turn it over to a court-appointed receiver before Zubkis could remove it from United States waters. The receiver is currently holding the yacht in San Diego, pending a final determination by the Court regarding whether to permit the receiver to sell the yacht and apply the sale proceeds toward satisfaction of the Commission's judgment against Zubkis.

Judge Koeltl previously held Zubkis liable for orchestrating a complex securities fraud scheme involving the use of boiler-room stock sale techniques and other egregious securities fraud violations. The Court ordered Zubkis to disgorge $21,578,731 in his illicit gains from the scheme, and permanently barred Zubkis from serving as an officer and director of a public company. Judge Koeltl previously found that, over "a period of several years, Mr. Zubkis, as head of [his corporation] Z3, knowingly orchestrated a securities fraud that netted several million dollars and from which he stood to profit personally. The misrepresentations in this case were egregious. This is, moreover, not the first time that Mr. Zubkis has been found in violation of securities related rules."

In ordering the yacht seizure on August 11, Judge Koetl found that the "Commission has made a prima facie showing, and has demonstrated a sufficient basis to infer, that Zubkis violated the [disgorgement] Judgment by failing to pay any portion of the $21,578,731.39 ordered disgorgement, and by continuing to serve as an officer and director of [a public company]," and that "Zubkis is the legal or equitable owner of the Yacht." In addition to ordering the yacht seizure, Judge Koeltl, at the Commission's request, froze certain "escrow accounts" also believed to be owned by Zubkis.



sec.gov 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/24/2003 7:19:18 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Do Cayman Islanders keep secrets? Don't even ask
From the Washington Post, 31st Aug 1991

By Steve Coll

GEORGE TOWN, CAYMAN ISLANDS -- On this sultry sliver of coral sand due south of Cuba, there are six traffic lights, 25,000 people and 540 banks holding $369 billion in largely secret deposits. Behind those statistics, residents say, lie a thousand tales of deceit, exile and fraud.

Whether those stories will ever be told is a story in itself.

In this British crown colony and tax haven, with an elected local government, it is a crime to discuss confidential business -- defined as matters learned on the job -- in public. It is also against the law to disclose financial records, bank accounts, transaction records or ownership files. Among the islands' 10,000 or so expatriates, nearly everyone seems to have a secret.

The question being debated in the islands these days is how long those secrets will be kept, and from whom. The U.S. government, concerned that the islands' banks have been used by drug smugglers to launder illegal profits, is pressing Britain to insist on greater openness and closer financial regulation. Cayman officials say substantial progress already has been made to satisfy Washington.

Now the bank scandal involving the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, which is accused of using a Cayman subsidiary as part of a multibillion-dollar fraud, is putting even more pressure on Cayman bank regulators.

The colony's bank inspectors did close BCCI's two subsidiaries here July 5 as part of an international seizure of BCCI operations coordinated by the Bank of England. But as details about BCCI's fraud emerge, it is becoming clear that the bank relied on its secretive Cayman subsidiaries to make improper loans that other arms of the bank might not have been able to hide.

The deal that got BCCI in trouble with U.S. authorities, for example, was its acquisition of Washington's First American Bank. In that transaction, BCCI disguised its ownership of First American shares by arranging loans to Middle Eastern front men by one of the bank's two Cayman subsidiaries, according to the Federal Reserve Board.

Cayman bank regulators argue that they should not be blamed for failing to detect carefully hidden fraudulent loans . They point out that they hardly were the only bank regulators fooled by BCCI. Nonetheless, U.S. bank regulators reacting to the scandal already are saying that more must be done to improve regulation and access to information in banking centers abroad like this one.

The problem regulators here face is that the secrecy laws are a key source of the islands' prosperity. Nobody in the Caymans, least of all the approximately 15,000 native islanders -- who lived in poverty before an influx of emerging multinational banks in the early 1970s -- wants to spoil a system that has produced one of the highest per capita incomes in the Caribbean.

The Caymans' bank laws have promoted a culture of secrecy that runs deeper than money. Lounging with young girls on the white beaches are ex-U.S. Air Force pilots with deep tans. When asked about their pasts, they admit only to running "some contract stuff" during the 1980s with a certain air cargo company that made regular flights to rural Honduras -- where the U.S.-backed Nicaraguan contra rebels were based.

There are American men who chuckle about how when their ex-wives back home reached divorce court, they found that marital assets mysteriously had been sold to a Cayman Islands corporation, beyond the reach of U.S. courts.

At the warm, breezy seaside restaurants, there are an inordinate number of older, well-dressed, well-tanned men with slender dates who appear to be only recently of age.

Then there is the story of the orange groves being planted on the east end of Grand Cayman, the only one of the three Cayman Islands that is heavily populated. The groves belong to Scandinavians associated with Tvinds, a self-described leftist humanitarian organization that collects old clothes in European cities and runs farms in different countries purportedly to feed the world's poor.

Some Tvinds directors apparently have chosen to move funds to Cayman banks, despite a notable lack of destitute poor here. Rick Catlin, a reporter who has written extensively about Tvinds for the Cayman Compass, the colony's only newspaper, said he has seen Tvinds officers carry briefcases with large sums of cash into banks. Catlin's reports, and also Scandinavian newspapers and television networks, allege that Tvinds executives here own a $500,000 beachfront condominium, a Mercedes jeep, several boats -- and now, scattered over valuable land on Grand Cayman, scores of orange groves.

The Tvinds officials have declined to explain.

Whether such mysteries will ever be solved depends partly on how the unfolding BCCI scandal plays out on the islands. Officials are anxious to dispel any impression that they sanction illegal activity.

Island bank regulators argue that the colony is thriving not because its secrecy laws shield criminals but because it has worked hard to develop a growing tourist industry and has served as an efficient, politically stable corporate tax shelter. Cayman companies and banks pay no taxes unless they buy or sell land.

The colony signed a mutual assistance treaty with Washington in 1986 that allows disclosure of information about Cayman bank accounts if U.S. law enforcement officials provide specific evidence of wrongdoing. U.S. bank regulators say the treaty is a good start, but not enough. Cayman regulators say they are moving as quickly as they can.

"I don't think there will be any changes in the way we regulate as a result of BCCI, mainly because it was fraud," said Jennifer Dilbert, the colony's deputy inspector of banks and trust companies. "We're not police, we're inspectors. . . . I think at this point in time, the correct infrastructure is in place."

Out on the sands of swank Seven Mile Beach, there are plenty of expatriates who could not agree more.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/24/2003 7:31:33 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Cronin back in jail after cheque scam

DIANE KING


NOTORIOUS sex offender John Cronin was today starting a new prison sentence after admitting to more than 50 charges of deception.

Cronin, 32, from Tranent, in East Lothian, has been jailed for two-and-a-half years after conning diamond jewellery, flowers, gifts and cigarettes from businesses.

The career criminal wrote cheques totalling £8242.94 from a bank account he set up with Barclays in Oldham, Greater Manchester, despite the fact it had never contained a penny.

He was arrested after the cheques bounced and he was tracked down to a pub in the town by a jeweller he had conned.

Cronin gained notoriety in 1992 when he was jailed for sexually assaulting a Tory Party activist in Edinburgh.

The 32-year-old gave an address in Raleigh Close, Oldham, when he appeared at Minshull Street Crown Court in Manchester.

The court heard him plead guilty to five counts of obtaining property by deception and ask for 52 more to be taken into consideration. Cronin spoke only to confirm his name and respond to the charges.

Prosecutor Alison Mather had told the court how the notorious sex offender posed as a painter and decorator to open a business account with Barclays in June 2002.

No cash was ever paid into the account but as soon as he was issued with a cheque book he went on an £8000 shopping spree.

The unsuspecting owner of a flower stall handed over flowers and goods including a £245 bouquet which were delivered to various addresses throughout the Oldham area.

A tobacconist parted with goods totalling £685. Cheques to both businesses bounced, the court heard.

Days later, a jeweller who Cronin had befriended handed over a £1397 ring which Cronin bought with a company cheque. Soon after he returned and purchased diamond earrings and a ring worth £2575.

The jewellery boss was alerted to the scam when the first cheque bounced and challenged Cronin after spotting him walking into a local pub on July 23.

The court heard that some of the property had been recovered but more than £5000 was still outstanding.

In mitigation defence counsel Andrew Smith said: "These offences were naive in the extreme, hardly sophisticated in their endeavour and ultimately bound to fail."

Passing sentence Judge Lowcock told Cronin: "You set out on a deliberate course of deception. This was a carefully planned series of offences."

Cronin was jailed for life in 1992 for a frenzied sexual attack on a female Conservative Party activist at her flat in Edinburgh.

He talked his way into her home after dressing as a priest who wanted to donate money to the Conservatives.

His victim, known only as Judy X, was beaten with a poker before being brutally sexually assaulted.

The life sentence imposed on him was reduced to six years on appeal and he was released in 1996.

Judy X was so outraged by the move she stood up at the Conservative Party Conference and condemned the justice system in a speech.

Two weeks after his release, Cronin fled to Ireland where he was promptly arrested and jailed for a year for committing a robbery while again posing as a priest.

He continued as a conman and served numerous prison sentences in Scotland and Ireland for fraud and deception.

He was jailed in February 2002 for an armed raid on a bank in Waterford, Ireland during which he threatened staff with a starting pistol and fled with £2500.

Hours after his release he robbed an 80-year-old lady and was jailed for two weeks. Just days after he was again released, he began offending in Oldham.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/24/2003 7:49:42 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Dear SEC, BY SECURITIES CROOK FRANCOIS GOELO LOL->"Of course, much more needs to be done but finally, in my opinion, we are getting
some action and regulations to protect investors a lot better. Keep up the good
work ! It is needed !"


Subject: Comments about naked shorting....
Date: 12/07/1999 1:07 PM


Dear SEC

I am writing in regards to the proposed law concerning the short selling of
OTC-BB stocks(Proposal # S7-24-99). The naked shorting of OTC-BB stocks should
be eliminated.

One of the main reasons why "penny" stocks are so risky and volatile is not
solely because of the companies themselves, but because of the rampant naked
shorting by market makers and offshore brokers, mostly without having to borrow
the shares and without "up-tick" or any other limitations.

This activity goes unchecked everyday and must be dealt with accordingly.
Unchecked and out-of-control chaos and deception seems to run rampant day after
day.

Unregulated Shorting is used as another weapon against bona fide investors who
are squuezed out by unscrupulous manipulators and shorters.

The abolition of naked shorting in conjunction with the requirements of being
fully reporting will ensure a more fair and equitable market for investors and
companies alike, a market where a company's true value is reflected in the price
and not distorted, suppressed or inflated artificially by manipulation.

Of course, much more needs to be done but finally, in my opinion, we are getting
some action and regulations to protect investors a lot better. Keep up the good
work ! It is needed !

Respectfully Submitted,


F. Goelo

========================================

U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 18088 / APRIL 14, 2003
SEC V. SIERRA BROKERAGE SERVICES, INC., RICHARD GEIGER, JEFFREY A. RICHARDSON, AARON TSAI, MICHAEL E. MARKOW, GLOBAL GUARANTEE CORPORATION, FRANCOIS GOELO, YONGZHI YANG, K&J CONSULTING, LIMITED, KE LUO, M&M MANAGEMENT, LIMITED, JEROME B. ARMSTRONG, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Civil Action No. CV03-326 (S.D. Ohio)

The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") today filed a civil action against eight individuals and four entities for their conduct between April 1999 and July 2000 relating to the price manipulation, unregistered sales, unreported stock ownership, and touting of securities issued by BluePoint Linux Software Corporation ("BluePoint"), a publicly-traded company located in Evansville, Indiana.

The Commission's complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, alleges that Aaron Tsai ("Tsai") formed a shell company called MAS Acquisition XI Corporation in 1996 and made false filings with the Commission to conceal his true ownership and control of MAS shares and to make it appear that the shares could be later sold without a registration statement in effect. According to the Complaint, on February 17, 2000, MAS acquired a Chinese Linux company and changed its name to BluePoint. On the same day, Michael Markow ("Markow") and his company Global Guarantee Corporation, Francois Goelo ("Goelo"), Yongzhi Yang and his company, K&J Consulting, Ltd., and Ke Luo and his company, M&M Management, Ltd. (collectively, the "Promoter Defendants") bought 3.75 million shares from Tsai for $250,000, or a little more than $0.06 per share. The Commission alleges that the Promoter Defendants acquired over 90% of BluePoint publicly traded shares without reporting their ownership in any Commission filing.

The Commission further alleges that the Promoter Defendants along with the participation of Sierra Brokerage Services, Inc. ("Sierra") and its two employees, Richard Geiger and Jeffrey Richardson, (collectively, the "Broker-dealer Defendants") worked in concert to create artificial trading activity and to manipulate the share price of BluePoint from $6 to a high price of $21 on the first day that BluePoint shares were traded on March 6, 2001. The Promoter Defendants and Broker-dealer Defendants dominated and control the BluePoint market that day. At all relevant times, Tsai, the Promoter Defendants, Sierra and Richardson sold or offered to sell shares in BluePoint without a registration statement in effect, and Tsai and the Promoter Defendants never reported their sales of BluePoint securities and the change in their ownership.

The Commission also alleges that Jerome Armstrong engaged in illegal touting of BluePoint on March 6 and after because he promoted BluePoint on the Raging Bull internet site, which carried hundreds of posts about BluePoint without disclosing the compensation he received from Markow and Goelo in return for his posts.

The Commission has charged: (1) Tsai, the Promoter Defendants, Sierra, and Richardson with violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"); (2) the Promoter Defendants and Broker-dealer Defendants with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; or in the alternative, Markow and Global Guarantee Corporation with aiding and abetting the other Promoter Defendants' violations of these provisions; (3) Sierra with violating Section 15(c)(1) of the Exchange Act and Richard Geiger and Jeffrey Richardson with aiding and abetting that violation; (4) Armstrong with violating Section 17(b) of the Securities Act; (5) the Promoter Defendants with violating Sections 13(d)(1), 13(d)(2), and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1(a), 13d-2(a), and 16a-3 thereunder, and Tsai with violating Sections 13(d)(1) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1(a) and 16a-3 thereunder. The Commission is seeking permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties from all defendants.




SEC Complaint in this matter



sec.gov 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 04/14/2003



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/28/2003 10:43:58 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
I see you have started a new web site. members.aol.com 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/28/2003 4:57:48 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Convicted swindler pleads no contest to new fraud charges

Thursday, August 28, 2003

By CHRIS W. COLBY, cwcolby@naplesnews.com

Michael Kehl, a once-convicted swindler, became a twice-convicted felon Wednesday by pleading no contest to creating what prosecutors say was a bogus company to try to draw investors he hoped would give him enough money to bail him out of his legal troubles.

But his 33-month prison sentence is just three months more than the term Kehl is already serving, so "it would have been crazy for him to go to trial," defense attorney Donald Day said after the plea in Collier County Circuit Court.



Convicted Naples swindler Michael Kehl

Judge Frank Baker formally convicted Kehl, founder of AiO Technologies Inc., of six felony charges, including racketeering conspiracy, conducting a fraudulent transaction by the sale of securities, sale of an unregistered security and operating a boiler room.

After entering a plea to the court without any agreement with state prosecutors as to what the sentence would be, Kehl, 53, received the 33-month prison sentence. That will be followed by two years of supervised probation.

Kehl will serve the prison term at the same time he completes a 2½-year prison sentence for cheating investors in the Naples-based AiO out of millions of dollars. He has spent several months in jail awaiting trial in the newer case, so he'll receive credit for that time served.

For the most serious charge he faced, Kehl could have been sentenced to up to 30 years in state prison. Instead, he'll spend less than three years in state prison. A recent appellate court decision changed the way state sentencing guidelines calculate prison sentences in certain white-collar crimes.

"He, basically, got the same sentence he already got without having to go to trial and possibly face all that time," Day said.

Kehl's former company, AiO, was marketing a computerized system for handling food orders by phone. But state investigators say most of the money raised for the company went into Kehl's own pockets, not into the development of the technology.

In 2001, Kehl was arrested and forced to give up AiO. A receiver sold the company's assets, including its technology.

Assistant State Attorney Douglas Sprotte, an Economic Crimes Unit prosecutor, said Kehl created All My Flowers as a bogus company, leading investors to believe the company had an exclusive contract to sell flowers from Chile, among other false claims.

Sprotte said Kehl started the flower company to raise the $250,000 needed to buy back AiO's technology. He planned to give the money to someone else to make the purchase as a cover-up.

But Kehl was arrested again, on Sept. 18, 2002, before he could get a dollar out of any potential investors.

A former business associate and co-defendant in the AiO case, Craig Goodie, helped organize a meeting between Kehl and an undercover detective, who Kehl thought was a potential investor in All My Flowers.

Goodie, a local insurance salesman whose charges were dropped when he agreed to testify against Kehl, noticed the officers in the company were using false names, and the company was looking to attract offshore investors. Also, most of the employees at the flower company had worked at AiO, and they were earning generous salaries.

Goodie also noticed Kehl driving a new Mercedes around town, even though the state had seized many of his assets after his arrest.

Goodie wore a surveillance wire and set up Kehl with the undercover agent, who negotiated the purchase of $100,000 worth of shares in the flower company, Sprotte said. Kehl mentioned nothing of the trouble he was in with AiO to the undercover detective.

"All My Flowers was interesting because none of the investors lost anything," Sprotte said. "We heard he was doing it and put the undercover officer on him and got him before any damage was done."

But Day said Kehl denies the underlying allegations behind the All My Flowers case. He said Kehl simply "messed up on the paperwork" while organizing a moneymaking, legal enterprise.

"Not only is it a legitimate business, it's going gangbusters right now," Day said.

After Kehl made his plea to the court Wednesday, Sprotte argued Kehl should receive consecutive sentences, meaning he'd have to complete the 2½-year prison sentence before he could begin serving the longer 33-month sentence for the All My Flowers case.

But Baker refused, instead sentencing Kehl to what was called for under state sentencing guidelines for Kehl's offenses.

"He didn't get a break from us in any way. He pleaded to everything he was charged with and got a guideline sentence," Sprotte said. "I'd, personally, like to see the guidelines addressed by the Legislature. I don't think the guidelines adequately address white-collar crime."

In the AiO case, prosecutors say Kehl used the $3.7 million he raised by selling the company's stock to support a lavish lifestyle that included fancy cars, boats and vacation homes.

He must pay back between $5 million and $6 million in restitution to investors, according to the plea agreement, in which he was formally convicted of operating a scheme to defraud, the sale of unregistered securities, the sale of securities by an unregistered agent, fraud in the sale of securities and operating a boiler room.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/28/2003 10:01:33 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
FURTHER VINDICATION FOR THE Z-8. MARK BERGMAN OF ACCESS1FINANCIAL UPDATE.

SEC settles with Odner in OTC-BB pump-and-dump
Securities and Exchange Commission
Thu 28 Aug 2003 Street Wire

by Stockwatch Business Reporter

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission has settled with
Environmental Solutions Worldwide Inc., an OTC-BB company, and its former
president Bengt Odner, in a massive OTC-BB "pump-and-dump" scheme. The SEC
plans to maintain its case against the many remaining defendants, which
includes five Canadians, for the operation of a massive boiler room of
Environmental Solutions shares. The allegations in the case have not yet
been proven in court, and the remaining defendants are considered innocent
until proven guilty.
As originally reported in Stockwatch on Aug. 9, 2002, the SEC claims that
the case involved a $15-million pump-and-dump scheme between February,
1999, and December, 2000. (All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise
indicated.) The SEC complaint alleges that the company and several of the
defendants arranged an aggressive proportional campaign to prime the
market, then issued 15 million "'unrestricted shares' in a sham Rule 504
'private offering.'" Several fraudulent press releases were issued
concerning the company's catalytic converter product. The shares were also
touted in spam E-mails and by a "false and misleading" analyst report. The
share price of the company responded to the promotion, rising from $2 to
$7. At the time when the stock was trading so high, two defendants,
Teodisio (Ted) V. Pangia and Satbal Sing, are alleged to have dumped
millions of shares they bought in the Rule 504 offering, profiting to the
tune of $15-million.
The cast of characters (defendants) in the case include Mr. Pangia of
Kleinburg, Ont.; Mr. Singh of Toronto, who was convicted in Canada of
narcotics trafficking in 1996 and sentenced to two years in jail; Michael
W. Smith, a lawyer from London, Ont.; Adam Michael Oliver, a lawyer from
Otterville, Ont.; Eugene Foo of Toronto; Mark Bergman of Jersey City, N.J.,
a close associate of disbarred Los Angeles lawyer Regis Possino, who was a
significant player in the General Commerce Bank affair, an Austrian scandal
that included fugitive Thai financier Rakesh Saxena, Saudi arms merchant
Adnan Khashoggi and a star-studded cast of other colourful financiers; and
Mr. Odner of the United Kingdom. Corporate defendants include Environmental
Solutions, three offshore companies Mr. Pangia is alleged to have created
for the scheme, Zoya Financial Ltd., a company owned and used by Mr. Singh
to issue false news releases during the scam, and Access 1 Financial Ltd.,
Mr. Bergman's tout company.
Environmental Solutions and Mr. Odner settled with the SEC on June 2, 2003.
Under the terms of the settlement, Environmental Solutions was permanently
enjoined from future violations of certain sections of the Securities
Exchange Act, which in essence has Environmental Solutions promising not to
break the law again. Mr. Odner also agreed not to break the law again, and
was fined $25,000 as a civil penalty.
Now that the partial settlement is out of its way, the SEC is charging full
speed ahead with its plans to prosecute the remaining defendants in the
case. Harold F. Degenhardt, district administrator of the SEC's Fort Worth,
Tx., office, told Stockwatch, "The commission intends to vigorously pursue
the remaining defendants in this case."
Last Friday, an application Mr. Pangia had made to dismiss the case against
him was tossed out by the court. The application was made on Jan. 9, 2003,
under which Mr. Pangia declared that the venue in which the case was being
heard, the District Court of the District of Columbia, had no jurisdiction.
He also states that "the Complaint is so devoid of factual allegations
accusant Pangia that it fails to meet even the minimal pleading
requirements."
The SEC, of course, took issue with Mr. Pangia's assertions, and it would
seem so did the court. On Aug. 21, 2003, Mr. Pangia's application was
dismissed by United States District Judge John Bates.
PANGIA AND THE ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION
The SEC is not the only securities regulator to have a go recently at Mr.
Pangia. The Ontario Securities Commission launched a case against Mr.
Pangia and Ontario associate Agostino Capista in October, 2001. The OSC
claims that in 1995, Mr. Pangia and Mr. Capista broke securities
regulations, an illegal distribution and unregistered trading, relating to
EPA Enterprises Inc., a company listed on TSX Venture Exchange. The OSC
claims that in one of the dubious distributions, 26,000 shares were
purchased for $84,500 (Canadian), for which a prospectus should have been
issued. Over all, the OSC noted Mr. Pangia, Mr. Capista and Dallas North,
(the company that received some of the proceeds from share sales), sold at
least 452,000 EPA shares to the public in 113 transactions for a total of
$1.39-million (Canadian.)
Mr. Pangia and Mr. Capista went through three brokers at TD Evergreen to
complete their trades, including branch manager Simon Kin-Ho Tam. Between
March, 1995, and February, 1996, Mr. Tam, assisted by brokers Woody
Woo-Keung Woo and April Shuk-Fan Che, helped Mr. Pangia and Mr. Capista
sell 452,000 EPA shares in "off book" transactions that were not recorded
in the books and the records of TD Evergreen.
"The trading in EPA shares was primarily orchestrated and directed by
Pangia," the OSC allegations claims. Mr. Pangia is alleged to have told Mr.
Tam on the number of EPA shares available for sale, the price at which the
shares were to be sold, to which company payment cheques should be payable,
and provided Mr. Tam with share certificates that Mr. Pangia, Mr. Capista
or Dallas North owned or controlled.
While the above transactions were in essence unregistered trading, at least
15 of the transactions constituted allegedly illegal distributions. In this
portion, TD Evergreen clients purchased EPA shares from a company called
Envirovision. Mr. Pangia then exercised EPA options, and the shares issued
under these exercises were delivered by Mr. Pangia to Mr. Tam for deposit
into the client accounts.
Mr. Pangia has been involved with a number of other companies, most
recently Enviro Industrial Technologies Inc., of which he has been chief
executive officer since July, 2000, and Grand Enterprises Inc. Since April,
2000, he has been chairman and CEO of Diamond Discoveries International
Corp., a junior diamond exploration company. The same month, he founded TVP
Capital Corp., described as a venture capital company, which provides
consulting services to Enviro Industrial.
SMITH'S GO AT QUASHING SERVICE
In yet another twist, Mr. Smith, the London, Ont. lawyer, is trying to have
the service of documents against him squashed. He states in documents filed
with the District of Columbia court that process server tried to leave the
documents with Sarah McGeen, who was at the time renting the basement suite
in Mr. Smith's house while he was not home. She and Mr. Smith have since
"developed a relationship" and are living together. In an affidavit, Ms.
McGeen states that she refused to accept documents from a process server
because she did not know if she would be able to deliver the document to
Mr. Smith, who was spending his summer at his cabin in Northern Ontario.
The process server appears to have tossed the papers on the front doorstep
after the door was shut, and Mr. Smith claims never to have seen the
original complaint. If the court will not dismiss the service against him,
Mr. Smith has asked for a time extension for him to address the complaint.

(With files from Stockwatch's Brent Mudry.)

(c) Copyright 2003 Canjex Publishing Ltd.

stockwatch.com 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)8/31/2003 6:36:29 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Bad Bad Bad, GUESS SOLOMAN GREY IS TO BUSY ANSWERING THOSE SEC SUBPOENA'S

ragingbull.lycos.com 

By: tomrox98
30 Aug 2003, 10:27 AM EDT
Msg. 695 of 695
Jump to msg. #
not good

I asked my broker to issue out my certificate in Asia Fiber and he said no way. The transfer agent resigned and there is no transfer agent. Bad Bad Bad. AFBR management is dishonest. I called a Texas facility 3 times and they would not even talk to me. Refused to return my calls.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/2/2003 8:34:19 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Reed Slatkin gets 14 years in prison for huge investment scam
Associated Press
Posted on Tue, Sep. 02, 2003

LOS ANGELES - Investment manager Reed Slatkin was sentenced Tuesday to 14 years in federal prison for running a nearly $600 million Ponzi scheme that bilked hundreds of investors.

Slatkin, who was a co-founder of Earthlink, also was ordered to pay victims $240 million in restitution, the amount for which he admitted personal responsibility.

Federal prosecutors believe the scam operated for 15 years, soliciting money from 800 investors. Slatkin, 54, pleaded guilty last year to five counts of mail fraud, three counts of wire fraud, six counts of money laundering and one count of conspiracy to obstruct justice.

The investment scam did not involve EarthLink.

"The havoc that the defendant wreaked was enormous," said U.S. District Judge Margaret N. Morrow, who added that the harm to the victims "was immense."

Several victims told the judge how Slatkin betrayed them after trusting him with their money.

Slatkin admitted that he portrayed himself as a successful financial adviser who provided investors with statements that showed hefty returns. But prosecutors said Slatkin did not buy securities on behalf of his clients.

Slatkin paid some investors returns that were largely made up of funds raised from other investors, prosecutors said.

His clientele included actor Joe Pantoliano, model Cheryl Tiegs and legal commentator Greta Van Susteren, but many of his accounts included people of modest means. His more notable clients were among the few who were repaid more than they invested.

Slatkin worked with others to obstruct an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission in 1999 by giving the agency false testimony and documents about his investment program, which in fact, was a large Ponzi scheme.

Three Slatkin associates were charged in relation to the investigation. Daniel Jacobs, 61, pleaded guilty to conspiring to obstruct the SEC investigation and will be sentenced Nov. 10. Richard McMullin, 39, pleaded guilty to three counts and is scheduled to be sentenced Nov. 24. Didier Waroquiers, 57, a fugitive, was indicted on a count of conspiracy to obstruct justice.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/3/2003 4:18:18 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
oooers.com 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/4/2003 2:10:31 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
State Securities Cops: Senior Investors Facing a Perfect Storm for Investment Fraud


State Regulators Announce Initiatives to Help Seniors

Weather Dangerous Times

WASHINGTON, Sept. 4 /PRNewswire/ -- Volatile stock markets, record low interest rates, rising health care costs, and increasing life expectancy, have combined to create a perfect storm for investment fraud against senior investors, state securities regulators warned today.

The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), which represents state and provincial securities regulators in the United States, Canada and Mexico, alerted senior investors to the dangers of investment fraud and urged them to take control of their financial health. To help, state securities regulators announced today a series of investor education initiatives and unveiled an online Senior Investor Resource Center on the NASAA website at www.nasaa.org/nasaa/sirc/sirc.asp.

"State securities regulators are deeply concerned that a perfect storm for investment fraud is brewing and our nation's 35 million seniors are most at risk," said Christine A. Bruenn, NASAA President and Maine Securities Administrator. "To a senior living on a fixed income, no amount of money lost is too small, and could mean the difference between a secure and dignified retirement or a life of uncertainty and despair," Bruenn said.

Bruenn said the collapse of the bubble economy, coupled with interest rates at 40-year-lows, and rising costs for medical insurance, prescription drugs and basic living expenses, have brought con artists from the side streets and back alleys to Main Street where older investors live. "These are dangerous times for seniors. They need education, they need protection," she said.

"Millions of people who are retired or soon-to-be retired are becoming increasingly concerned, some even desperate, about their finances -- and are more vulnerable than ever to investment fraud and abuse," Bruenn said. "Concerned and desperate people can make bad decisions and are tempting targets for con men. Concerned and desperate people need more, not fewer, cops on the securities beat."

State securities regulators said older investors are being targeted with increasingly complex investment scams involving unregistered securities, promissory notes, charitable gift annuities, viatical settlements, and Ponzi schemes all promising inflated returns.

"Behind these schemes are opportunists who know that seniors and others living on fixed incomes are being squeezed in the current financial environment," Bruenn said. "Their products and pitches sound tempting to many seniors who've seen their retirement accounts and income dwindle in recent years -- and who may not have the benefit of time to recoup their losses."

State regulators cited several examples of recent cases of investment fraud against seniors. For example:

* In Maine, a broker admitted to stealing more than $230,000 from 12

clients, half of whom were seniors, by selling a variety of unregistered

securities, promissory notes, mutual funds and stocks. Following an

investigation by state securities regulators, most of the stolen funds

have been returned and the broker is serving nearly 4 years in prison.

* In Delaware a widow sold her house to purchase a promissory note

offering 10- to 50-percent annual returns in response to an ad in a

publication entitled "Better Years." The unregistered investment turned

out to be fraudulent and the 78-year-old woman now lives with her son

and works as a convenience store clerk to make ends meet.

* Arizona state securities regulators earlier this summer obtained a $4.3

million final judgment against a Scottsdale company and two insurance

agents -- both former professional baseball players -- who fraudulently

sold charitable gift annuities to mostly senior investors who were told

their money would be invested in secure accounts. Instead it was placed

in high-risk, speculative investments while the insurance agents helped

themselves to $1.3 million in commissions.

* Securities regulators in Massachusetts unearthed a training manual from

the Senior Benefit Centers Network, which recruited and trained

associates specifically to target older investors and coerce them into

selling their securities holdings to purchase annuities. The scheme

pursued seniors through free "Senior Financial Survival Workshops,"

which authorities say were designed to persuade older investors to sell

their securities holdings and buy annuities, which generate high

commissions. Among other things, the manual instructed sales associates

to urge clients not to tell their children of their purchases and to

"make the decision for them."

Bruenn urged seniors not to be ashamed or humiliated to admit that they have been victims of investment fraud. "Silence only helps the con artists lead another victim into the trap. Every day that financial fraud goes unreported is another day that criminals can steal retirement savings from unsuspecting seniors," she said.

"No one likes this kind of publicity," agreed Kenneth Reusser, 82, of Beaverton, Oregon. Among the victims of investment fraud at the news conference, Reusser said he is motivated to speak out to help others avoid putting their retirement security at risk.

"I want to alert other seniors to protect themselves and take control of their finances," said Reusser, Oregon's most highly decorated Marine aviator, and the veteran of 213 combat missions in three wars. Despite his five Purple Hearts, he says nothing wounded him as gravely as falling victim to a high- yield investment scheme he and his wife were introduced to by friends they met through a club called "Life After 50." Today, Reusser's loss totals $262,500 and his hand-built "dream home" is in foreclosure, having been mortgaged to fund his investment.

"Common sense tells you that if something sounds too good to be true it almost always is. But you don't have to rely on common sense alone," Bruenn said. "Contact your state securities regulator with any questions about an investment." State regulators can, for example, report whether an investment product is licensed for sale in your state or whether a salesperson has a history of wrongdoing.

Karen Tyler, North Dakota Securities Commissioner and chair of NASAA's Investor Education Section, said the target for those who prey on seniors grows larger every day. "Each day, more than 5,500 people turn 65 years old and nearly one out of every eight Americans is 65 years or older. That number will only grow higher as the Baby Boomers reach retirement age," she said.

Noting that state securities regulators have a long tradition of protecting investors through education, Tyler announced that NASAA is launching a new investor education initiative designed to assist seniors. "Our mission is clear: to provide seniors with the educational resources they need to help keep their retirement nest eggs safe from investment fraud," Tyler said.

NASAA's new Senior Outreach initiative will monitor senior-related investment fraud issues and develop targeted educational responses; create a Seniors Against Investment Fraud program blueprint, based on a highly successful program developed by California securities regulators, for other states to tailor to their own audiences; survey existing senior programs and publications offered by state securities regulators and establish a clearinghouse for this information on the NASAA website.

Tyler also unveiled the initiative's first project, the Senior Investor Resource Center on NASAA's website. "The online Senior Investor Resource Center has been developed specifically for senior audiences and offers a variety of important information and resources," she said.

The Senior Investor Resource Center offers: a checklist of questions seniors can ask before making an investment decision; common sense solutions to protect your nest egg from investment fraud; information about the top frauds targeting seniors; contact information for securities regulators in each state, the District of Columbia, Canada, Mexico and Puerto Rico; an Investors Bill of Rights and Investor Fraud awareness quiz and; links to a variety of investor education publications and programs offered by state securities regulators and others to help seniors fight investment fraud.

"It's never too late to improve your financial education," Tyler said. "I'm confident that our Senior Outreach initiative and the Senior Investor Resource Center will make great progress toward our goal of helping senior investors take control and protect themselves from investment fraud by providing the tools they need to make sound financial decisions," Tyler said.

"With thousands of Baby Boomers reaching retirement age every day, more and more investors will find themselves in a precarious position regarding their retirement income security," said Mary Wallace, a senior legislative representative with AARP's Department of State Affairs. "NASAA's senior outreach initiative will be invaluable in the fight against investment scams and will help older people protect their retirement income against financial predators." "We look forward to working with NASAA on this very worthwhile effort."

State securities regulators offered the following tips to help seniors protect themselves from investment fraud.

* Don't be a courtesy victim. Con artists will not hesitate to exploit

your good manners. Save your good manners for friends and family

members, not strangers looking for a quick buck!

* Check out strangers touting strange deals. Trusting strangers is a

mistake everyone makes when it comes to their personal finances.

Extensive background information on investment salespeople and firms is

available from the Central Registration Depository (CRD) files available

from your state securities agency.

* Always stay in charge of your money. Beware of anyone who suggests

putting your money into something you don't understand or who urges that

you leave everything in his or her hands.

* Don't judge a book by its cover. Successful con artists sound and look

extremely professional and have the ability to make even the flimsiest

investment deal sound as safe and sound as putting money in the bank.

The sound of a voice, particularly on the phone, has no bearing on the

soundness of an investment opportunity.

* Watch out for salespeople who prey on your fears. Con artists know that

you worry about outliving your savings. Fear can cloud your good

judgment. An investment that is right for you will make sense because

you understand it and feel comfortable with the risk involved.

* Don't make a tragedy worse with rash financial decisions. The death or

hospitalization of a spouse has many sad consequences -- financial fraud

shouldn't be one of them. If you find yourself suddenly in charge of

your own finances, get the facts before you make any decisions. Arm

yourself with information and your confidence will send con men running.

* Monitor your investments and ask tough questions. Don't compound the

mistake of trusting an unscrupulous investment professional or outright

con artist by failing to keep an eye on the progress of your investment.

Insist on regular written and oral reports. Look for signs of excessive

or unauthorized trading of your funds. And if you are stalled when you

want to pull out your principal or profits from an investment, you have

uncovered someone who wants to cheat you.

* Don't let embarrassment or fear keep you from reporting investment

fraud or abuse. Con artists know that you might hesitate to report that

you have been victimized in financial schemes out of embarrassment or

fear. Con artists prey on your sensitivities and, in fact, count on

these fears preventing or delaying the point at which authorities are

notified of a scam. Every day that you delay reporting fraud is one more

day that the con artist is spending your money and finding new victims.

- NASAA -

SOURCE North American Securities Administrators Association

CO: North American Securities Administrators Association; NASAA

ST: District of Columbia

SU:

Web site: nasaa.org 

prnewswire.com 

09/04/2003 12:10 EDT



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/4/2003 2:30:37 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Two going to prison for bilking investors
Cyprus Fund partners lost life savings of many

By Kymberli Hagelberg
Beacon Journal staff writer
Posted on Wed, Sep. 03, 2003

Almost exactly 4 years ago, hundreds of Ohio retirees learned their savings in Cyprus Funds had been wiped out and the man who operated the mutual fund had vanished.

On Wednesday, about a dozen of the bilked investors sat quietly in a federal courtroom in Cleveland as two of fund director Eric Bartoli's partners received prison time for their roles in the $34 million fraud.

Douglas R. Shisler, 59, of Doylestown was sentenced to 24 months in federal prison. Peter J. Esposito Jr., 48, of Middleburg Heights will serve 21 months. The men have been ordered to repay $8 million and $6 million, respectively.

Shisler and Esposito were charged with selling unregistered securities and filing false tax returns. In April, both pleaded guilty and pledged to cooperate with the investigation into remaining Cyprus Funds partners Bartoli and James Binge, a Jackson Township tax preparer who surrendered his securities license in 1999.

Chief U.S. District Judge Paul R. Matia could have sentenced the men to between 37 and 46 months in prison. The reduced penalty came at the recommendation of court receiver Michael Goldberg and the federal prosecutor's office.

`Nothing this court can do will improve anyone's lot in this case,'' Matia said before issuing his sentence.

Fraud also betrayal

``It's a vacation for these two,'' Josephine DiVincenzo of Euclid told the judge during her victim-impact statement.

DiVincenzo's mother, Dora Allen, died three years after learning she had lost her $125,000 life savings in the fraud.

Shirley Estes of Akron lost her retirement account raised from a 40-year career at Ameritech, as well as the savings of her 94-year-old father, who worked more than 42 years at Firestone.

``I was betrayed by a friend who never apologized,'' Estes said. ``They may go to prison, but we will live in financial prison for the rest of our lives.''

This year, Estes has fought breast cancer and cared for her husband, who has suffered a stroke.

``What do you do when you have $7 left over after bills and groceries?'' she asked. ``I don't know if I can afford the medical treatment I may need in the future.

``But I'd rather be in my position,'' she said, looking directly at Shisler and Esposito. ``I will live with a free conscience.''

Fund was ponzi scheme

Investigators say Bartoli, Shisler, Esposito and Binge operated Cyprus Funds from late 1995 until Aug. 27, 1999, when the SEC seized the Doylestown-based business and its assets.

The men raised $80 million, but only about $ 4 million was invested, investigators said.

The SEC describes the fund as a classic ponzi scheme, in which new sales are used to pay old investors. But most of the money was diverted into offshore accounts held by Bartoli and his partners or used to fund the men's sometimes bizarre lifestyles and business ventures.

Since the fund was seized, investors have watched auctioneers sell off South American art, antiques, herds of sheep, fields of soybeans, lavishly remodeled homes, jewelry, satellite-driven agricultural equipment and 1,500 acres of Ohio farmland.

Attorneys for Shisler and Esposito described the men as unwitting cogs in Bartoli's illegal machine.

``My only intention was to help these people,'' said Shisler, whose hair has gone from a mixture of gray and sandy brown to stark white since the fund failed. ``The last four years have been a total nightmare.''

Esposito attended a tax-reduction seminar where he met Eric Bartoli, said Esposito's attorney, Edward Bryan.

Bryan said Esposito graduated 411th in a high school class of 450 and was targeted by the men because he had a large clientele of senior citizens in his insurance business.

Esposito also lost the life savings of his family and his late father in the fraud, according to court records.

``I went to bed every night proud because I thought I had made a difference in the lives of those people,'' Esposito said. ``Today my father's funeral is still not paid for.''

In 2000, a federal judge in Miami found Bartoli liable for civil fraud. The Cyprus partners signed consent decrees -- the civil equivalent of a no-contest plea.

Bartoli and Binge have not been charged in criminal court.

The Cyprus Funds founder is living in Peru with his wife, Silvana, and two children, although he surrendered his passport more than a year ago after an arrest for civil contempt in New Hampshire.

So far, Goldberg has recouped $15 million in cash and property. Much of the success of the recovery effort and any potential charges against Bartoli and Binge can be traced to Shisler, Goldberg told the judge.

``Mr. Bartoli needed a man like Shisler, who was not bright enough, I'm sorry to say, to ask questions,'' Goldberg said.

Estes shed her anonymity to help sue a Florida bank in a class-action suit.

Lawyers reached a $5 million settlement in that case last week.

Case against KeyBank

Now a Stark County woman has stepped up to be one of two named plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed Aug. 25 against KeyBank.

The class-action lawsuit alleges employees of a Stark County bank branch and a Barberton branch assisted in opening Cyprus accounts that diverted funds.

Unlike many of the Ohio Cyprus investors, Tina Hollinger, 42, is a single mother of young children with years of sports teams, college tuitions and weddings ahead of her.

Binge introduced Hollinger to Cyprus Funds. He had filed each of her tax returns since she took her first job at age 17.

It was in that relationship that Binge offered to help her prepare for her future when she married 21 years ago.

Hollinger still can't bring herself to speak the actual dollars of her loss out loud. The money was every dime she and her husband, Terry, managed to put away in their marriage.

Tina remembers Terry often teasing about what would happen if their investment failed.

``He told Binge, `If you take my family's money, you're a dead man,' '' she recalled.

A little more than a year later, Terry died in an accident. All that was left was her husband's life insurance policy and a plan that would make the money grow, Binge promised the young widow.

Soon the insurance money also would be gone.

On Wednesday, Binge was still costing Hollinger money.

She now works two jobs, but took time off to see the men sentenced.

``It's never enough,'' Hollinger said through tears. ``It's never enough for what we lost.''


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kymberli Hagelberg can be reached at 330-478-6000 (Ext. 14) or 1-800-478-5445 or khagelberg@thebeaconjournal.com



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/8/2003 4:13:05 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
JUDGMENT ENTERED AGAINST INVESTMENT BANKER WHO ORCHESTRATED MARKET
MANIPULATION SCHEME OVER THE INTERNET

The Commission today announced that on Aug. 19, 2003, the U.S. District
Court in Los Angeles entered a final judgment against an individual who
claimed to be an investment banker who orchestrated a "pump and dump"
scheme to manipulate the price of New Energy Corp. securities over the
Internet.

Marcelino Colt, aka Marcelino Colt Vasquez, who claimed to be an
investment banker and a resident of Panama and Mexico, and his firm,
Geneva Financial Ltd., a Nevis corporation that purported to be an
international investment banker, failed to answer the complaint filed on
February 1, 2002. The final judgment permanently enjoins Colt and
Geneva from future violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal
securities laws. The judgment orders Colt and Geneva to pay civil
penalties of $120,000 and $600,000, respectively, and to disgorge
$495,848, which represents the amount of their ill-gotten gains as a
result of the conduct alleged in the Commission's Complaint, plus
prejudgment interest. The judgment also orders another defendant who
did not answer the Commission's Complaint, Hector Campa Acedo, to
disgorge $120,020 representing ill-gotten gains as a result of the
conduct alleged in the Complaint and later disbursed to him, plus
prejudgment interest.

Colt and Geneva, along with New Energy and its president, Tor Ewald, and
Magnum Financial LLC dba Stratos Research LLC, and its president,
Michael S. Manahan, were charged with violating Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Colt and
Geneva were also charged with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities
Act of 1933.

The Commission's complaint alleged that New Energy and Ewald were part
of a "pump and dump" scheme to manipulate New Energy's stock price
during a one-month period ending on January 18, 2002, when the
Commission suspended trading. The Commission's complaint alleged that
Colt orchestrated the manipulative scheme, including the hiring of
Magnum to post a false and misleading buy recommendation, the
distribution of mass e-mails or spam containing fraudulent statements,
issuing a false and misleading press release, and placing the release
onto New Energy's website. These statements included, among other
things, false and misleading claims regarding a relationship with the
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, negotiations with Coca-Cola
bottlers in Mexico for thermal generators, and false claims that New
Energy's partner had a "virtual lock" on the world market for high
concentration solar cells.

Previously, Judgments were entered against New Energy, Ewald, Magnum,
and Manahan that enjoin them from future violations of the antifraud
provisions of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-
5 thereunder. New Energy, Ewald, Magnum, and Manahan consented to the
entry of the Judgments without admitting or denying the Commission's
allegations. The Judgments order that New Energy, Ewald, Magnum, and
Manahan shall pay any monetary relief in amounts subsequently to be
determined by the Court.

Previously, pursuant to the consent of the parties, the Court entered a
limited asset freeze against relief defendants York Chandler and Burke
Maxfield. The Court froze $82,500 of Chandler's assets and $159,250 of
Maxfield's assets pending the final resolution of the Commission's
action against them. These amounts represent alleged ill-gotten gains
from trading New Energy shares. [SEC v. NEW ENERGY CORP., TOR EWALD,
GENEVA FINANCIAL LTD., MARCELINO COLT aka MARCELINO COLT VASQUEZ, MAGNUM
FINANCIAL, LLC, MICHAEL S. MANAHAN, BLD TRUST, BARCLAY DAVIS, LORETTA
DAVIS, BURKE T. MAXFIELD, YORK CHANDLER, AND HECTOR CAMPA ACEDO, Civil
Action No. CV-02-989-MMM (CWx) (C.D. Cal.)] (LR-18328)



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/8/2003 6:08:29 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
SEC CHARGES THREE FORMER TRADERS AT KNIGHT SECURITIES WITH ENGAGING IN FRAUDULENT TRADING SCHEME

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 18329 / September 8, 2003
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. BRIAN P. DELANEY, et al., No. 03-4206 (JWB) (D.N.J.)

SEC CHARGES THREE FORMER TRADERS AT KNIGHT SECURITIES WITH ENGAGING IN FRAUDULENT TRADING SCHEME

On September 8, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey charging three former traders at Knight Securities, L.P. - Brian P. Delaney of New Jersey, Nicole M. Shkedi of New Jersey, and Thomas J. Donovan of New York - with engaging in a trading scheme that defrauded Knight of approximately $1.4 million. The Commission also issued a related administrative order charging a fourth individual - Charles C. Campbell of New Jersey - with being a cause of the violations by two of the former Knight traders. Delaney, Shkedi, and Campbell each settled the proceedings against them without admitting or denying the Commission's charges, while Donovan is contesting the charges.

In its complaint in federal court, the Commission alleged that Delaney, Shkedi, and Donovan were all formerly employed by Knight as equity traders responsible for making markets in specific equity securities. The Commission further alleged that, as equity traders, the defendants had discretionary trading authority over Knight trading accounts maintained for the purpose of carrying out Knight's business as a market maker in these specific stocks. According to the Commission, from at least March 2001 through February 2002, the three former traders abused their positions at Knight by knowingly and intentionally executing fraudulent stock trades from the Knight proprietary accounts they controlled at prices guaranteed to generate profits in private brokerage accounts that they also controlled. The Commission alleged that the defendants' trading scheme defrauded Knight of approximately $1.4 million, which Knight has since recovered from Delaney.

The complaint charges Delaney, Shkedi, and Donovan with committing securities fraud in violation of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"), Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5. Without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations, Delaney and Shkedi have consented to the court's entry of final judgments that would permanently enjoin them from violating the foregoing provisions of the securities laws, as well as to the Commission's issuance of administrative orders that would bar them from associating with any registered broker or dealer based on the federal court's anticipated entry of injunctions against them. Shkedi also has consented to pay $25,000 in civil penalties, half of which would be paid to the New Jersey Bureau of Securities, which has filed contemporaneous charges against Delaney, Shkedi, and Donovan. The Commission is seeking a permanent injunction, disgorgement of unlawful gains, and civil penalties against Donovan, who is contesting the Commission's charges.

In its administrative order against Campbell, the Commission found that Campbell opened an online brokerage account which he knew or should have known was being used by two of the former Knight traders to facilitate their unlawful trading scheme, that Campbell was an indirect beneficiary of the fraudulent trading in the account, and that Campbell was therefore a cause of the securities law violations by those two former Knight traders. Based on these findings, the Commission ordered Campbell to cease and desist from committing or causing such violations in the future. Campbell consented to issuance of the Commission's order without admitting or denying the Commission's findings. See Exchange Act Release No. 34-48458 (September 8, 2003).

In a related criminal case, the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey charged Delaney with wire fraud and conspiracy in connection with the trading scheme alleged in the Commission's complaint. On September 8, 2003, Delaney entered a guilty plea to such charges.

The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the both the United States Attorney's Office and the New Jersey Bureau of Securities in the investigation of this matter.

SEC Complaint in this matter



sec.gov 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 09/08/2003



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/10/2003 10:43:14 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Former Enron Treasurer pleads guilty -- CNBC


HOUSTON, Sept 10 (Reuters) - Fired Enron Corp. Treasurer Ben Glisan on Wednesday pleaded guilty to one count of criminal conspiracy and agreed to cooperate with prosecutors, CNBC reported.

The plea agreement gives prosecutors a highly placed witness who may be able to testify against the failed company's top executives.

Glisan's cooperation is bad news for his former boss, former Enron Chief Financial Officer Andrew Fastow, who is named in the same 109-count indictment and is accused of being the architect of many of the alleged misdeeds that brought about Enron's collapse.

It may also mean trouble for former Chairman Kenneth Lay and former Chief Executive Jeff Skilling. Both men are under investigation and have denied any wrongdoing. Neither has been charged with a crime.

Glisan had been charged with money laundering, fraud and conspiracy for taking part in one of the secret partnerships Fastow is alleged to have set up to inflate Enron's earnings and put millions of dollars in his own pocket.



09/10/03 09:50 ET



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/10/2003 10:54:46 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
GOELO, MY GUESS IS YOU DONT SHOW UP TO YOUR TRIAL. IF YOU DO HERE IS AN IDEA FOR YOU.

WHAT A CRATE IDEA

By STEVEN MORRIS and MARSHA KRANES

September 10, 2003 -- A Brooklyn man who had himself crated and flown as air cargo to Texas to visit his folks has landed - in jail.
A flabbergasted deliveryman notified police after he spotted 25-year-old Charles McKinley peering out from between slats of his cramped crate as it was about to be unloaded at his parent's home in DeSoto, a Dallas suburb.

The driver, Billy Ray Thomas, thought there was a body in the crate until McKinley kicked his way out.

"My father thought it was something out of a TV movie. My mother was shocked," McKinley told The Post in a jailhouse interview.

Asked why he stowed away, he said, "However I had to get there, I wanted to come home."

McKinley, who is 5-foot-8 and 170 pounds, spent 15 hours scrunched up inside the wooden crate, which was only 31/2 feet wide by 3 feet tall and 15 inches deep.

One of the few items he had with him was a cell phone - but it didn't work, he said, noting that he turned it on during the trip hoping to be discovered.



"I was mad at the situation and the stupidity I had gotten myself into. I thought if they find me, I'd be happy, but they didn't pick up my signals."

McKinley, a shipping clerk for a Bronx-based computer firm, said his unorthodox odyssey was arranged through someone he met early this year, who had set up a similar flight for a friend.

Sources said he chose to go overnight air cargo express to avoid paying $383 for a last-minute, one-way ticket aboard a passenger jet.

They said his 1,500-mile, $550 trip cost him nothing - he charged it to his employer, Metro Tech.

His journey started on Friday at 5:45 p.m. when he was picked up, crated, in The Bronx.

A co-worker helped pack him in the crate, which was marked for "Saturday special delivery" and had its contents listed as "computer, monitor, clothes," according to Transportation Security Administration spokesman Mark Hatfield.

The 416-pound crate was trucked to Kennedy Airport, transferred to another truck and taken to Newark Airport.

There it was loaded into an air-cargo container and put on a Kitty Hawk Air Cargo Flight to Buffalo.

"No one checked anything. . . . They just slapped a bill of lading on it [the crate]," McKinley said.

Only once during the trip - which took him from Newark to Buffalo to Fort Wayne, Ind., to Dallas/Ft. Worth - did he see a dog or anyone on checking for anything suspicious. But he wasn't spotted.

McKinley was arrested after the deliveryman contacted DeSoto police. He was charged with two probation violations in Dallas for writing bad checks for which he is expected to serve 22 days in jail.

When he's released, McKinley said, he will help the FBI catch the man who set up his trip.

A TSA official said the agency is "not aware that this has happened previously so obviously it's something we are investigating aggressively."

Federal officials said they have not yet determined what, if any, charges will be filed against McKinley for the air-cargo caper.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/10/2003 11:44:34 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Michael Marcow First Ammendment right to sell unregistered securities!!!!!

It is in the public interest to discuss the sale of unregistered securities!
Court says NO........

courtinfo.ca.gov 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE


ROBERT VAN HOOSE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v.MICHAEL M. MARKOW et al., Defendants and Appellants. B162761 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LC061600)


APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard B. Wolfe, Judge. Affirmed.
Resch Polster Alpert & Berger, Michael C. Baum, and Andrew V. Jablon, and Ari Markow, for Defendants and Appellants.
David Steiner & Associates, David Paul Steiner and Paul E. Katz, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


I. INTRODUCTION

Defendants, Michael M. Markow, Global Guarantee Corporation (GGC), and Worldwide Corporate Finance (WCF), appeal from an order denying their special motion to strike (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16) an action filed against them by plaintiff, Robert Van Hoose. We affirm.

II. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff’s complaint alleges as follows: Mr. Markow was the alter ego of the corporate defendants, GGC and WCF; Mr. Markow and WCF were the subjects of a Desist and Refrain Order issued by the California Department of Corporations in May 1998; a co-defendant, Robert Highstreet, who is not a party to this appeal, conspired with defendants “to sell securities through the dissemination of fraudulent and misleading information”; in the summer of 2000, Mr. Highstreet contacted plaintiff by telephone concerning the sale of stock shares in Shopss.Com, Inc.; Mr. Highstreet made negligent or fraudulent oral misrepresentations concerning the investment; Mr. Highstreet then had Mr. Markow telephone plaintiff; and Mr. Markow made further negligent or fraudulent misrepresentations about Shopss.Com, Inc., and, later, about Score One, Inc. Plaintiff was induced to purchase shares in both entities. In doing so, according to the complaint, plaintiff relied on oral misrepresentations made by Mr. Highstreet and Mr. Markow in telephone conversations. Plaintiff alleged: the Shopss.Com, Inc. shares “are now virtually worthless”; the Score One, Inc. shares underwent a reverse split; and the Score One, Inc. stocks “have been devalued by approximately 90%.” Plaintiff asserted causes of action against Mr. Markow, GGC, and WCF for: negligent misrepresentation; fraud; unfair competition in violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200; and unfair business practices in violation of Business and Professions Code sections 17045 and 17048.
Plaintiff’s complaint also alleged that in furtherance of the conspiracy, Mr. Highstreet posted “fraudulent and/or misleading material” on the Internet and made similar misrepresentations in news and press releases. There is no allegation, however, that plaintiff ever read the information on the Internet or in the news and press releases. There is no allegation plaintiff relied on anything he read on the Internet or in news or press releases. To the contrary, plaintiff specifically alleged he relied on oral misrepresentations made by Mr. Highstreet and Mr. Markow in telephone conversations.
In opposition to defendants’ special motion to strike, plaintiff presented the following evidence. Plaintiff met Mr. Highstreet on the Internet. Mr. Highstreet had later telephoned plaintiff. During a telephone conversation, Mr. Highstreet discussed an investment opportunity in Shopss.Com, Inc. Mr. Highstreet had learned of the investment opportunity from Mr. Markow. After speaking with plaintiff, Mr. Highstreet gave plaintiff’s telephone number to Mr. Markow. Mr. Markow telephoned plaintiff. Mr. Markow persuaded plaintiff to invest. Mr. Markow did not tell plaintiff about the Desist and Refrain Order. Mr. Markow had misrepresented the nature of the shares available to both plaintiff and Mr. Highstreet. Plaintiff did not see and did not rely on any press releases prior to his investment. Mr. Highstreet declared, “[T] his entire series of transactions led to the bilking of groups of individual investors.”

III. DISCUSSION

A. Section 425.16

A special motion to strike may be filed in response to “‘a meritless suit filed primarily to chill the defendant’s exercise of First Amendment rights.”’ (Dove Audio, Inc. v. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 777, 783, quoting Wilcox v. Superior Court (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 809, 815, fn. 2, disapproved on another point in Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc. (2002) 29 Cal.4th 53, 68, fn. 5.) Section 425.16, which was enacted in 1992, authorizes a court to summarily dismiss such meritless suits. (Stats. 1992, ch. 726, § 2, pp. 3523-3524.) The purpose of the statute was set forth in section 425.16, subdivision (a) as follows: “The Legislature finds and declares that there has been a disturbing increase in lawsuits brought primarily to chill the valid exercise of the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and petition for the redress of grievances. The Legislature finds and declares that it is in the public interest to encourage continued participation in matters of public significance, and that this participation should not be chilled through abuse of the judicial process. . . .” Under section 425.16, any cause of action against a person “arising from any act . . . in furtherance of the . . . right of petition or free speech . . . ,” in connection with a public issue must be stricken unless the court finds a “probability” that the plaintiff will prevail on whatever claim is involved. (§ 425.16, subd. (b)(1); Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc., supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. 58; Dowling v. Zimmerman (2001) 85 Cal.App.4th 1400, 1415.)
When a special motion to strike is made, the trial court must consider two components. First, the court must consider whether the moving defendant has carried its burden of showing that the lawsuit falls within the purview of section 425.16, i.e., arises from protected activity. The moving defendant has the initial burden of establishing a prima facie case that plaintiff’s cause of action arises out of a defendant’s actions in the furtherance of petition or free speech rights. (§ 425.16, subd. (b)(1); Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc., supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. 67; Mission Oaks Ranch, Ltd. v. County of Santa Barbara (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 713, 721, overruled on another point in Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity (1999) 19 Cal.4th 1106, 1123, fn. 10.) The moving defendant has no obligation to demonstrate that the plaintiff’s subjective intent was to chill the exercise of constitutional speech or petition rights. (Navellier v. Sletten (2002) 29 Cal.4th 82, 89; Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc., supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. 66.) Nor must a moving defendant show that the action had the effect of chilling free speech or petition rights. (Navellier v. Sletten, supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. 88; City of Cotati v. Cashman (2002) 29 Cal.4th 69, 75.)
Second, once the defendant meets this burden, the obligation then shifts to the plaintiff to establish a probability that she or he will prevail on the merits. (§ 425.16, subd. (b)(1); Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc., supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. 67; Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity, supra, 19 Cal.4th at p. 1115.) As to the second step of the weighing process, the Supreme Court in Wilson v. Parker, Covert & Chidester (2002) 28 Cal.4th 811, 821, described the trial judge’s duties as follows: “In deciding the question of potential merit, the trial court considers the pleadings and evidentiary submissions of both the plaintiff and the defendant (§ 425.16, subd. (b)(2)); though the court does not weigh the credibility or comparative probative strength of competing evidence, it should grant the motion if, as a matter of law, the defendant's evidence supporting the motion defeats the plaintiff’s attempt to establish evidentiary support for the claim. [Citation].)” (Orig. italics, see Paul for Council v. Hanyecz (2001) 85 Cal.App.4th 1356, 1365, disapproved on another point in Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc., supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. 68, fn. 5.) We conduct independent review of the trial court’s decision. (Mission Oaks Ranch, Ltd. v. County of Santa Barbara, supra, 65 Cal.App.4th at p. 721; Paul for Council v. Hanyecz, supra, 85 Cal.App.4th at p. 1364.)
Section 425.16, subdivision (e), defines acts in furtherance of free speech or petition rights in connection with a public issue by setting forth four categories of conduct to which the statute applies. Section 425.16, subdivision (e) provides: “As used in this section, ‘act in furtherance of a person's right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue’ includes: (1) any written or oral statement or writing made before a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding, or any other official proceeding authorized by law; (2) any written or oral statement or writing made in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial body, or any other official proceeding authorized by law; (3) any written or oral statement or writing made in a place open to the public or a public forum in connection with an issue of public interest; (4) or any other conduct in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of petition or the constitutional right of free speech in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest.” (Italics added.) The Supreme Court has held that a specific public issue showing is required for acts claimed to fall under section 425.16, subdivisions (e)(3) and (e)(4). (Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity, supra, 19 Cal.4th at pp. 1111-1123; Du Charme v. Intern. Bro. of Elec. Workers (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 107 [1 Cal.Rptr.3d 501, 505-506].) As the Court of Appeal explained in Consumer Justice Center v. Trimedica International, Inc. (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 595, 600-601, “When the defendant’s alleged acts fall under the first two prongs of section 425.16, subdivision (e) (speech or petitioning before a legislative, executive, judicial, or other official proceeding, or statements made in connection with an issue under review or consideration by an official body), the defendant is not required to independently demonstrate that the matter is a ‘public issue’ within the statute’s meaning. (Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity[, supra,] 19 Cal.4th [at p.] 1113 [].) If, however, the defendant’s alleged acts fall under the third or fourth prongs of subdivision (e), there is an express ‘issue of public interest’ limitation. (Id. at p. 1117 [].)” If a matter of public interest is not at issue, section 425.16, subdivisions (e)(3) or (e)(4) do not apply. (Commonwealth Energy Corp. v. Investor Data Exchange, Inc. (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 26 [1Cal.Rptr.3d 390, 393]; Consumer Justice Center v. Trimedica International, Inc., supra, 107 Cal.App.4th at p. 600.)

B. Application to the Present Case

Defendants contend plaintiff’s lawsuit arises out of the exercise of free speech rights. However, the alleged acts underlying the complaint’s causes of action were statements made in direct, private telephone conversations between plaintiff and Mr. Markow. There is no indication Mr. Markow made the statements at issue in furtherance of his free speech rights in connection with any public issue. (§ 425.16, subd. (e)(4).) Mr. Markow sought simply to induce plaintiff to invest in certain entities. This was purely private speech unrelated to a public issue. Therefore, it does not fall within section 425.16. (ComputerXpress, Inc. v. Jackson (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 993, 1001-1002; Averill v. Superior Court (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 1170, 1174.) Because we so find, we need not consider whether plaintiff established a probability of prevailing on the merits of his claims (Navellier v. Sletten, supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. 88; Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc., supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. 67), or reach any of the related issues raised by defendants on appeal. Plaintiff’s causes of action do not rest on any statements made in “a place open to the public or a public forum” (§ 425.16, subd. (e)(3)) and defendants do not contend otherwise.
Defendants contend the speech in question was in connection with a public issue because Mr. Markow talked to plaintiff about publicly traded corporations. They rely on ComputerXpress, Inc. v. Jackson, supra, 93 Cal.App.4th at page 1007, and Global Telemedia International, Inc. v. Doe 1 (C.D.Cal. 2001) 132 F.Supp.2d 1261, 1265, for the proposition that discussions about a publicly traded company are statements in connection with a public issue. Neither case so held. In both ComputerXpress, Inc. and Global Telemedia, the plaintiffs’ causes of action arose out of messages the defendants had posted on the Internet that were critical of the plaintiff, a publicly traded corporation, and were directed at existing or potential shareholders. In this case, plaintiff’s causes of action arise out of wholly different facts.
Consumer Justice Center v. Trimedica International, Inc., supra, 107 Cal.App.4th at pages 600-602, is similar to the present case. A consumer advocacy group brought an action for false advertising and consumer fraud against defendants who claimed their product, Grobust, was “‘The All-Natural Way To A Fuller, More Beautiful Bust!’” (Id. at p. 598.) The defendants argued, in support of their section 425.16 motion, “‘[H]erbal dietary supplements and other forms of complementary medicine are the subject of public interest.’” (Id. at p. 601.) The Court of Appeal held the defendants’ acts were not in furtherance of their free speech rights in connection with a public issue. The court’s discussion was as follows: “. . . Trimedica’s speech is not about herbal supplements in general. It is commercial speech about the specific properties and efficacy of a particular product, Grobust. If we were to accept Trimedica’s argument that we should examine the nature of the speech in terms of generalities instead of specifics, then nearly any claim could be sufficiently abstracted to fall within the anti-SLAPP statute. [] CJC suggests a hypothetical regarding false statements made in the course of a real property sale. Blackacre sells a house to Whiteacre, and Whiteacre sues, claiming defendant misrepresented the square footage. Whiteacre brings a special motion to strike, claiming his speech involves a matter of public interest, because millions of Americans live in houses and buy and sell houses. CJC correctly suggests that applying the anti-SLAPP statute in such a case would be absurd. [] This case is no more about the general topic of herbal supplements than the hypothetical above is about the general topic of buying and selling houses. The lawsuit in the hypothetical is about the specific topic of whether Blackacre misrepresented the house’s square footage to Whiteacre. The topic of this lawsuit is whether Trimedica misrepresented the specific properties and benefits of Grobust. Neither is a matter of general ‘public interest’ within the meaning of the statute. [] . . . [] The stated intent of the anti-SLAPP statute is ‘to encourage continued participation in matters of public significance.’ (§ 425.16, subd. (a).) No logical interpretation of this statement suggests that ‘matters of public significance’ includes specific advertising statements about a particular commercial product, absent facts which truly make that product a matter of genuine public interest, as was the case in [DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Co. v. Superior Court (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 562, alleging a pharmaceutical company artificially inflated the price of a medication used by nearly 2 million Americans for treatment of life-threatening conditions]. . . . Construing the statute in this manner would allow every defendant in every false advertising case (or nearly any case that involves any type of speech) to bring a special motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute, even though it is obvious that the case was not filed for the purpose of chilling participation in matters of public interest. . . . We do not believe the Legislature intended the statute to be construed in such a manner . . . .” (Consumer Justice Center v. Trimedica International, Inc., supra, 107 Cal.App.4th at pp. 601-602.)
Weinberg v. Feisel (July 25, 2003, C041087) __ Cal.App.4th __ [2 Cal.Rptr.3d 385], is also similar to the present case. In Weinberg, the complaint alleged the defendant told others that the plaintiff had stolen a valuable item from him. (Id. at p. 387.) Our Third Appellate District colleagues explained, “[D]efendant claims that the cause of action ‘ar[o]se from [his] discussion of criminal activity, which is “an issue of public interest” under the [anti-SLAPP] statute.’” (Id. at p. 387.) The Court of Appeal disagreed, stating, “Defendant has failed to demonstrate that his dispute with plaintiff was anything other than a private dispute between private parties. The fact that defendant allegedly was able to vilify plaintiff in the eyes of at least some people establishes only that he was at least partially successful in his campaign of vilification; it does not establish that he was acting on a matter of public interest. [] Defendant contends that his statements accused plaintiff of criminal activity and that criminal activity is always a matter of public interest. . . . [] . . . [] [However,] [d]efendant did not report his suspicions to law enforcement, and there is no evidence that he intended to pursue civil charges against plaintiff. Rather, it is alleged that defendant began a private campaign . . . to discredit plaintiff in the eyes of a relatively small group of [people]. Since the record does not support a conclusion that plaintiff is a public figure or that he has thrust himself into any public issue, defendant’s accusations against plaintiff related to what in effect was a private matter. [] Simply stated, causes of action arising out of false allegations of criminal conduct, made under circumstances like those alleged in this case, are not subject to the anti-SLAPP statute. Otherwise, wrongful accusations of criminal conduct, which are among the most clear and egregious types of defamatory statements, automatically would be accorded the most stringent protections provided by law, without regard to the circumstances in which they were made—a result that would be inconsistent with the purpose of the anti-SLAPP statute . . . .” (Id. at pp. 393-395.)
In another case, the Court of Appeal held a cause of action based on contractual obligations between a communications company and a consultant was not premised on acts in furtherance of the right of free speech. (Ericsson GE Mobile Communications, Inc. v. C.S.I. Telecommunications Engineers (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1591, 1601-1602, disapproved on another point in Navelier v. Sletten, supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. 92, fn. 8; Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc., supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. 68, fn. 5; and Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity, supra, 19 Cal.4th at p. 1123, fn. 10.) In Ericcson, the Court of Appeal held, “Since the acts of [the defendants], upon which the action here is based, were related to the performance of their contractual obligations, and were not motivated by their desire to promote or advance their right of free speech, the first prong of the test has not been met.” (Ericsson GE Mobile Communications, Inc. v. C.S.I. Telecommunications Engineers, supra, 49 Cal.App.4th at p. 1602.)
Nagel v. Twin Laboratories, Inc. (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 39, 46-48, is also noteworthy. The plaintiff in Nagel sued a dietary supplement manufacturer for false and misleading advertising. At issue were statements on the defendant’s product’s label and on its website listing the product’s ingredients. The Court of Appeal opinion focused on the fact the speech at issue was commercial speech. However, the court also rejected the defendant’s argument its list of ingredients was in connection with a public issue—weight management. (Id. at p. 47.) The Court of Appeal explained, “[T]he list of . . . ingredients on the bottle labels and on [the defendant’s] Web site was not participation in the public dialogue on weight management issues; the labeling on its face was designed to further [the defendant’s] private interest of increasing sales for its products. [Citation.] [Defendant’s] commercial speech was not made ‘in connection with a public issue’ as that phrase is used in section 425.16.” (Id. at pp. 47-48.)
In the present case, defendants’ acts, allegedly misrepresenting the nature of investments in shares of corporate stock, were not in furtherance of their free speech rights in connection with a public issue. This lawsuit is about whether defendants misrepresented, in private communications with plaintiff, the nature of the investments. It concerns a private dispute. Mr. Markow was not engaged in a public interest dialogue involving a publicly held corporation. He simply sought to induce plaintiff to purchase shares in two corporations. This was not a matter of general public interest within the meaning of the section 425.16. Section 425.16 cannot be construed to extend to the present case. (Cf. Weinberg v. Feisel, supra, __ Cal.App.4th at pp. __-__ [2 Cal.Rptr.3d at pp. 393-395]; Nagel v. Twin Laboratories, Inc., supra, 109 Cal.App.4th at pp. 46-48; Consumer Justice Center v. Trimedica International, Inc., supra, 107 Cal.App.4th at pp. 600-602; Ericsson GE Mobile Communications, Inc. v. C.S.I. Telecommunications Engineers, supra, 49 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1601-1602.) Accordingly, we affirm the order denying the section 425.16 special motion to strike.

IV. DISPOSITION

The order denying the Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 special motion to strike is affirmed. Plaintiff, Robert Van Hoose, is to recover his costs on appeal, jointly and severally, from defendants, Michael M. Markow, Global Guarantee Corporation, and Worldwide Corporate Finance.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

TURNER, P.J.


We concur:



ARMSTRONG, J.


MOSK, J.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/10/2003 11:59:51 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
BTW, we will presure Regulators and the Gov. to bring you to justice for your crimes.

Our investigation is ongoing.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/11/2003 6:52:29 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
1. Mr. Goelo requests a trial by jury. 2. Mr. Goelo requests judgment in his favor on all counts and an award of attorneys fees and costs under provision of the Equal Access to Justice Act.

By: sailbad43
11 Sep 2003, 06:39 PM EDT
Msg. 13222 of 13223
Jump to msg. #
Francois Goelo's response...

runs some 19 pages and mostly consist of:

1. denying that he acted as part of any group.
2. admitting that he resides in the Cayman Islands.
3. admitting that he bought and sold Bluepoint stock, but cannot accurately calculate the amount of trading profit he realized, if any. lol.

but mostly his response was:

4. Mr. Goelo is without sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the Commission's allegation.

His "Prayer for Relief" at the end of his submission is destined to be a classic.

1. Mr. Goelo requests a trial by jury.
2. Mr. Goelo requests judgment in his favor on all counts and an award of attorneys fees and costs under provision of the Equal Access to Justice Act.

And it was respectfully submitted by Francois Goelo Pro Se.


Sailbad



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/11/2003 6:55:22 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Armstrong denies that he was compensated by Goelo and Markow through his purchase of stock in separate companies. Armstrong recalls that at least one of the three stocks under question was bought at above the market price.

Paragraph 70: Armstrong denies that he profited from selling Bluepoint. An examination of the trades by Armstrong of BLPT will show that Armstrong lost many thousands trading Bluepoint.

Paragraph 74: Armstrong does not know the specific amount he gained from selling the shares of three securities in question he purchased from "Markow and Goelo". Armstrong would add that he recalls having purchased a total of five stocks from "Markow and Goelo". Besides the three securities in question, and Bluepoint, there is one further stock, apparently not included by the Plaintiff, that was purchased for $10,000, which is now held in certificate, and currently, more or less worthless.



Poor little Jerome..Jackson

By: sailbad43
11 Sep 2003, 06:16 PM EDT
Msg. 13221 of 13223
Jump to msg. #

Poor little Jerome..Jackson

In answer to case number ()3 CV 326 with Judge Holschuh and Magistrate Judge Able, I humbly submit this document.

Over 3 months ago, without sufficient funds to defend myself through a lawyer, I asked for the court to appoint one. To date, there has been no response from the court. I am compelled by the Plaintiff and court, under the threat of default, to answer the allegation without any form of representative defense.

Answering to the Commission's case, I will limit my response to the matters dealing with Jerome B. Armstrong, myself. I have previously submitted a Wells statement, which I humbly submit is read when considering the validity of the case brought against myself by the Plaintiff.

Paragraph 8: Armstrong denies posting on the Raging Bull internet site about Bluepoint in return for compensation.

Paragraph 69: Armstrong denies knowledge of his postings being part of an orchestrated scheme for individuals to tout Bluepoint. Armstrong would like to point out that, alongside the Plaintiff's statement that "Armstrong posted over 80 times on the Raging Bull website in the first three weeks", it is a fact that Armstrong posted over 8000 posts on Raging Bull, on over 250 stocks in the chat threads, during the years 1998-2000. There is nothing in regard to the amount or content of posts I made about Bluepoint that is inconsistent with my normal posting practice at that time.

Armstrong denies that he was compensated by Goelo and Markow through his purchase of stock in separate companies. Armstrong recalls that at least one of the three stocks under question was bought at above the market price.

Paragraph 70: Armstrong denies that he profited from selling Bluepoint. An examination of the trades by Armstrong of BLPT will show that Armstrong lost many thousands trading Bluepoint.

Paragraph 74: Armstrong does not know the specific amount he gained from selling the shares of three securities in question he purchased from "Markow and Goelo". Armstrong would add that he recalls having purchased a total of five stocks from "Markow and Goelo". Besides the three securities in question, and Bluepoint, there is one further stock, apparently not included by the Plaintiff, that was purchased for $10,000, which is now held in certificate, and currently, more or less worthless.

Paragraph 104: Armstrong denies the allegations.

Paragraph 105: Armstrong denies the allegations.

Sincerely,

Jerome B. Armstrong

followed by his signature and dated Aug 29th, 2003.

Sailbad



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/11/2003 6:58:55 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Paragraph 74: Armstrong does not know the specific amount he gained from selling the shares of three securities in question he purchased from "Markow and Goelo". Armstrong would add that he recalls having purchased a total of five stocks from "Markow and Goelo". Besides the three securities in question, and Bluepoint, there is one further stock, apparently not included by the Plaintiff, that was purchased for $10,000, which is now held in certificate, and currently, more or less worthless.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/11/2003 7:01:02 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
AH FRANCOIS GOELO, THE INVESTIGATION IS ONGOING. IT WILL BE FUN WATCHING YOU FRY LIKE FRENCH TOAST.

OUR RESEARCH IS NEVER ENDING AND YOU WILL BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/12/2003 11:15:39 AM
From: Sir Auric GoldfingerRespond to of 19401
 
"Francois Goelo Pro Se" BWAHAHA What about that Florida Atty of yours???? Run outta dough or are family members helping out. What a POS U R.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/12/2003 12:02:04 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Case Number: LC057862 MICHAEL M. MARKOW VS ERROL832000 ET AL.

Filing Date: 10/05/2001
Case Type: Defamation (Slander/Libel) (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Future Hearings
09/17/2003 at 08:30 am in department NWQ at 6230 Sylmar Ave., Van Nuys
Motion-Be Relieved as Counsel

11/04/2003 at 08:30 am in department NWQ at 6230 Sylmar Ave., Van Nuys
Hearing (HEARING ON AMOUNT OF SANCTIONS TOBE ASSESSED FOLLOWING THE COURT'SGRANT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FORSANCTIONS OF 4/29/03.)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Documents Filed | Proceeding Information
Parties

BLUMENFELD STANLEY JR - Attorney-Plaintiff

DAVID TRAVIS - Defendant

ERROL832000 - Defendant

EXPOSETRUTH - Defendant

JENS TINGLEFF - Defendant

MARKOW ARI LORIN - Former Attorney for Plaintiff

MARKOW MICHAEL M. - Plaintiff

PATTERSON TRAVIS INC. - Defendant

STANLEY SANDRA ELAINE - Attorney-Defendant

TINGLEFF - Defendant



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding Information
Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)

Click on any of the below link(s) to see documents filed on or before the date indicated:
11/06/2002 12/17/2001

08/19/2003 Motion-Relieved/Withdraw
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

07/17/2003 Remittitur (APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT IS DISMIS SED BY DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, ENTERED ON 2-26-03. RESPONDENT TO RECOVER COSTS ON APPEAL )
Filed by Court

05/13/2003 Order-Dismissal
Filed by Court

05/12/2003 Order
Filed by Clerk

04/30/2003 Notice-Ruling (1) Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions; and 2) Setting Hearing to determine amount of sanctions )
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

04/30/2003 Notice (TO REPORTERS/MONITORS TO PREPARE TRANSCRIPT ON APPEAL FOR APPEAL FILED: 3-7-03 )
Filed by Court

04/14/2003 Memorandum-Points & Authorities
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

04/04/2003 Miscellaneous (Civil Case Information Statement )
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

03/24/2003 Notice-Stay
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

03/20/2003 Motion-Sanctions
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

03/20/2003 Declaration
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

03/19/2003 Notice-Atty in re-Ntc of Appeal
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

03/07/2003 Notice-Appeal
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

03/07/2003 Designation-Reporter's Transcript (PAID FEE OF $325.00 )
Filed by Attorney for Deft/X-Complainant

02/28/2003 Notice-Ruling (1) Denying Defendants'special motion to strike; 2) Lifting stay of discovery; and 3) Setting hearing for Sanctions )
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

02/24/2003 Brief
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

02/24/2003 Declaration
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

02/24/2003 Objection
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

02/18/2003 Declaration
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

02/11/2003 Notice-Continuance
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

01/31/2003 Notice-Continuance
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

01/31/2003 Memorandum-Points & Authorities
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

01/23/2003 Remittitur (APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT IS DISMIS SED BY DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL. RESPONDENT(S) TO RECOVER COSTS. )
Filed by Court

01/17/2003 Motion-Strike
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

01/06/2003 Amendment to Complaint
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

11/15/2002 Notice-Unavailablity-Counsel
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

Click on any of the below link(s) to see documents filed on or before the date indicated:
TOP 11/06/2002 12/17/2001

11/06/2002 Notice
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

10/30/2002 Remittitur (APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT IS DISMIS SED BY DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL. RESPONDENT(S) TO RECOVER COSTS. )
Filed by Court

10/30/2002 Notice
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

09/30/2002 Notice-Status Conference
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

09/03/2002 Order (Granting Respondent's Motion for Reconsideration, Vacating Reinstatement of Appeal, and Dismissing Appeal )
Filed by Court

08/20/2002 Notice-Continuance
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

07/19/2002 Order (Proposed Order on Motion to Reinstate Appeal. Signed by Judge Klein )
Filed by Court

07/01/2002 Order (APPELLANT IS IN DEFAULT PURSUANT TO RULE 17a(1), CRC, (FORMERLY RULE 17a) THE APPEAL FILED 2-5-02 IS DISMISSED. ORDER SIGNED BY JUDGE KLEIN )
Filed by Court

04/23/2002 Notice-Continuance
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

03/06/2002 Notice-Ruling
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

03/05/2002 Answer
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

03/04/2002 Notice (OF DESIGNATION AND LODGING OF REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT. )
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

02/15/2002 Notice-Election (TO PROCEED UNDER RULE 5.1 OF THE CRC. )
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

02/15/2002 Notice-Designation Clerk Transcrip (NOTICE THAT REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF. )
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

02/08/2002 Notice-Atty in re-Ntc of Appeal
Filed by Court

02/07/2002 Notice-Ruling
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

02/05/2002 Notice-Appeal
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

01/22/2002 Notice-Ruling
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

01/17/2002 Memorandum-Points & Authorities
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

01/16/2002 Memorandum-Points & Authorities
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

01/10/2002 Notice
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

01/08/2002 Motion (MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT )
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

01/08/2002 Miscellaneous (PLAINTIFF'S APPENDIX OF NON- CALIFORNIA AUTHORITIES CITED IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE )
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

01/08/2002 Objection
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

01/08/2002 Declaration
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

01/08/2002 Memorandum-Points & Authorities
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

Click on any of the below link(s) to see documents filed on or before the date indicated:
TOP 11/06/2002 12/17/2001

12/17/2001 Notice-Continuance
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

12/13/2001 Substitution-Attorney
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

12/03/2001 Motion-Strike
Filed by Attorney-Defendant

10/25/2001 Ex-Parte Application
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

10/25/2001 Order
Filed by Attorney-Plaintiff

10/05/2001 Complaint

Click on any of the below link(s) to see documents filed on or before the date indicated:
TOP 11/06/2002 12/17/2001



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Case Information | Party Information | Documents Filed
Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)

08/21/2002 at 08:30 am in department NWQ, RICHARD B WOLFE, Presiding
Motion-Amend (MOTION OF PLAINTIFF FOR LEAVETO AMEND COMPLAINT.ALSO POST-MEDIATION STATUS CONF.) - Off calendar

10/25/2001 at 08:30 am in department NWQ, RICHARD B WOLFE, Presiding
ExParte Petition (OF PLAINTIFF MICHAEL M. MARKOW FORORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TOSERVE DEPOSITION NOTICE ON ANEARLIER DATE.) - Granted



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Case Information | Party Information | Documents Filed | Proceeding Information



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/12/2003 9:56:51 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
Goelo and crew where pumping BluePoint over time with their paid to buy cronies following up nicely.

Behind bars is where these market manipulators belong.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/16/2003 8:55:21 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
RPT-U.S. prosecutors extradite Peter Paul from Brazil


LOS ANGELES, Sept 15 (Reuters) - Federal authorities in New York on Monday said they have completed the extradition of Peter Paul, the co-founder of defunct online entertainment company Stan Lee Media, from Brazil to the United States to face conspiracy and securities fraud charges.

Paul left the United States in late 2000 or early 2001 and was arrested in Brazil in August 2001. He has been held in a Brazilian prison. In July the Brazilian Supreme Court ordered his return to the United States to face charges.

Paul and comic book icon Stan Lee, who the U.S. Attorney's Office in eastern New York said is not suspected of any wrongdoing, created Stan Lee Media to capitalize on the dot-com boom and a surge in the popularity of online animation sites.

Prosecutors claim that Paul and others engaged in a plot to pump up the stock price of the Nasdaq-listed Stan Lee Media and profit from subsequent stock sales.

Paul appeared before a magistrate judge on Monday morning and was ordered to be detained.

He is represented by Judicial Watch, an organization well known for pursuing claims of government corruption. In a statement earlier this month, the organization said Paul had been transferred to the most violent wing of one of Brazil's most notorious prisons.

They have claimed Paul has detailed information about donations made to the 2000 U.S. Senate campaign of former first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, who was eventually elected to represent the state of New York.

"Judicial Watch is pleased that Peter is finally back in the United States," Tom Fitton, the president of the organization, told Reuters. "He's eager to cooperate so that all are held accountable, especially Hillary and Bill Clinton."

09/15/03 17:15 ET



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/17/2003 3:27:52 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Merrill Lynch Ex-Employees Indicted in Enron Case (Update4)

Sept. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Three former Merrill Lynch & Co. executives were charged with conspiracy to defraud investors in a 1999 transaction that allowed Enron Corp. to report a phony $12 million profit, the U.S. Justice Department said.

Daniel H. Bayly, Robert S. Furst and James A. Brown were indicted in Houston in connection with Merrill's $28 million purchase of Nigerian energy barges from Enron. Merrill avoided prosecution by promising the government it will change its procedures, accept outside oversight and report complex transactions directly to clients' outside auditors.

``Merrill Lynch becomes a watchdog of clients, not a lapdog or conspirator,'' U.S. prosecutor Andrew Weissmann said on the steps of the federal courthouse in Houston, calling the agreement a model for the financial-services industry. ``We're satisfied that they get it.''

The indictments follow last week's guilty plea by former Enron Treasurer Ben F. Glisan Jr., as prosecutors weigh whether to charge the company's former chief executives Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling. The U.S. already has charged 19 former officials, including ex-Chief Financial Officer Andrew Fastow, for roles in Enron's bankruptcy, which wiped out $68 billion of market value and 5,600 jobs.

Not Cooperating

Bayly, Furst and Brown are scheduled to appear today in federal court in Houston to enter pleas. Weissmann said they're not cooperating with prosecutors.

``We're going to defend this case in court,'' said Furst's lawyer Ira Sorkin, adding that his client will plead not guilty. ``There's nothing Rob Furst did that was not vetted and reviewed and approved by others more senior to him at Merrill.''

Assistant Attorney General Christopher Wray said in Washington that Merrill's agreement to alter procedures governing complex structured transactions with clients is a blueprint for the industry.

``There's a right way and a wrong way to respond when the government comes knocking at your door,'' Wray said. ``Merrill responded the right way.''

In the accord, New York-based Merrill, the world's biggest securities firm by capital, said it accepted responsibility for its former employees' conduct and will cooperate with the criminal investigation.

The firm pledged to accept an outside auditor's oversight of its policies and procedures for 18 months and create a new committee to review complex financial transactions.

Merrill Avoids Prosecution

In return, the Justice Department agreed not to prosecute the firm. The government reserves the right to bring charges if Merrill violates the agreement.

Merrill spokesman Mark Herr said the firm has no comment on the indictments.

Bayly, the former investment banking chairman; Furst, a former managing director; and Brown, who headed the strategic asset lease finance group, were charged with conspiring to commit wire fraud and falsify financial records.

Brown also was charged with lying to a federal grand jury and obstructing its investigation.

``Investigations of this type are extremely difficult and complicated, and are made even more so when people deliberately seek to hide the truth from investigators,'' Wray said.

Prosecutors claim the defendants conspired with Fastow and Daniel Boyle, Enron's former vice president for Global Finance. Both were charged in May 2003. Fastow's trial is set for April 2004.

SEC Settlement

The prosecutions follow civil charges that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission brought in March against Merrill Lynch, Furst, 42; Bayly, 56; and two other former executives in connection with the Enron transactions. The firm settled the SEC allegations for $80 million without admitting or denying the allegations.

Glisan pleaded guilty last week to conspiring to defraud investors and was sentenced to five years in prison, becoming the bankrupt energy company's highest-ranking ex-employee to admit wrongdoing in the accounting scandal. Glisan also settled SEC fraud allegations related to the sale of the Nigerian barges.

Enron, once the seventh-biggest company in the U.S., filed for bankruptcy protection in December 2001 after writing off $1 billion in failed investments and admitting it hid $1.2 billion in losses in off-the-books partnerships. The filing was the largest U.S. bankruptcy at the time and remains the largest when measured by debt.

Merrill Lynch is a passive, minority investor in Bloomberg LP, the parent of Bloomberg News.

Last Updated: September 17, 2003 13:52 EDT



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/20/2003 4:52:10 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Mehl released on bail in Martin fraud case
By Melissa E. Holsman staff writer
September 20, 2003

STUART — While prosecutors on Friday claimed a former Stuart man facing securities charges earned millions in commissions by bilking local retirees, the man's wife insisted they were nearly broke and pleaded with a judge to lower his $400,000 bail.

Former financial adviser Philip Mehl, 65, a Lakeland resident who turned himself in to Martin County authorities on Thursday, faces 37 counts of unlawful sale of securities and 43 counts of selling securities without a license.

Before Mehl's Stuart office was shut down in 2001, he persuaded hundreds of Treasure Coast seniors to sink $23 million into Mehl-related companies involving pay phones, music, videos and pain management, state agents said.

Investigators said Mehl — who portrayed himself as a religious man who kept a Bible on his desk and frequently quoted scripture — targeted seniors who'd already bought insurance policies from him or attended finance seminars he conducted.

In court Friday, Susan Mehl, 49, who conceded the couple owns a $70,000 manufactured home in a Lakeland golf community, insisted they hold no other assets and have only $1,300 in the bank.

She also said a federal judge has declared the couple bankrupt and bankruptcy court officials were unable to identify any substantial assets.

Susan Mehl denied a prosecutor's suggestion that in 2001, when the couple shut down their Stuart office and sold their $400,000 home in Harbor Ridge, they "washed" the cash "through a relative" to keep investigators from finding the funds.

Assistant State Attorney Levering Evans said the investigation found that Philip Mehl had his son deposit the proceeds from the sale of their home in an account then re-issue the funds back to them.

"This case has the smell of having a lot of hidden money out there," Evans told Circuit Judge Robert Makemson.

Susan Mehl, however, insisted the cash went to buy money orders to pay bills and legal fees. She also said that a Mehl cousin is giving them money to pay their current bills.


"All that money went to attorney's fees," Susan Mehl said as she stood by her husband, who appeared in court wearing a blue jumpsuit and leg shackles. "When the house sold, we got some checks. Each check was like $20,000 ... to make money orders to pay bills and to pay attorney fees."

At issue was whether Mehl, accused of earning at least $2.5 million in fraudulent commissions in the late 1990s, should be considered a flight risk.

Evans said investigators found documents on his computer in 2001 that indicated he was about to transfer $300,000 into an offshore bank account in Antigua. He said they also had evidence Mehl kept a bank account in the Bahamas.

However, state investigators on Friday testified that they've been unable to determine whether Mehl ever transferred funds out of the country.

Susan Mehl said they don't have any money in foreign bank accounts and insisted her husband would return for future court hearings.

"Because it's the law and we feel that we need to abide by the law," she said.

After listening to both sides, Judge Makemson ruled that because Mehl faces 80 felony charges, $5,000 bail per count was "excessive" and ordered his total bail lowered to $80,000.

Mehl was released on bail Friday evening.


- melissa.holsman@scripps.com



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/20/2003 4:57:50 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
ITC Issues Alert to Shareholders


DALLAS, Sept. 19 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Infinite Technology Corporation (OTC Pink Sheets: ITCJ) ("ITC") announced today that it has been advised by one of its shareholders in France of contact by a group in the United States that claimed that it had acquired 49 percent of the Company's outstanding common stock. The group offered to purchase the shareholder's stock at a highly inflated price. In order to sell the shares at the high price, the shareholder was instructed to send $9,888 to the organization to cover an insurance indemnity bond purportedly to meet SEC requirements since 9/11. Allegedly, this money would subsequently be refunded along with the sale proceeds once the shareholder's share certificate was confirmed as being valid.

"No party has acquired a 49 percent interest in the Company and there are no discussions or negotiations with any party to do so. The Company is not aware that shares representing 49 percent of the outstanding stock are available for sale, and there have been no filings with the SEC disclosing the acquisition or intended acquisition of control of the Company," according to Tim Smith, CEO of the Company. "We are also not aware of any SEC requirement to purchase an indemnity bond as claimed," stated Smith.

ITC Shareholders are urged to beware of offers to purchase the Company's stock at inflated prices, along with a requirement to post a bond of any kind. Shareholders are asked to report any such contacts to the Company immediately. ITC has undertaken an investigation of this incident and anticipates turning over any information obtained to appropriate authorities, if the results of the investigation indicate any improper activity.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain information contained in this press release are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995 (the "Act"), which became law in the USA in December 1995. In order to obtain the benefits of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Act for any such forward- looking statements, the Company wishes to caution investors and prospective investors about significant factors, which among others, have in some cases affected the Company's actual results and are in the future likely to affect the Company's actual results and cause them to differ materially from those expressed in any such forward-looking statements.

SOURCE Infinite Technology Corporation

CO: Infinite Technology Corporation

ST: Texas

SU:

prnewswire.com 

09/19/2003 17:14 EDT



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/21/2003 1:34:25 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
FBI seeks public awareness on Internet fraud
By Quintin Cushner -- Staff Writer

9/21/03 Senior FBI Agent Edward J. Miller Jr. sits in the bureau's Santa Maria office, reading accounts of Internet theft and deception.

A Lompoc man was notified via e-mail that he won the Spanish "El Gordo Lottery." Someone posing as a lotto official told him the payout was $600,000, but for the money to be released, the man needed to send a $1,200 "processing fee." The man did, but he never received his winnings.

An Arroyo Grande man received an e-mail from a supposed online casino representative offering $86,000 in gambling vouchers for the bargain price of $10,000. The local man sent a check, but never heard back from the company.

Miller has received many complaints about the "Nigerian Scam," so-called because fraudulent e-mails claim to originate from the African nation.

In this ruse, a target receives an e-mail from a Nigerian national posing as an entrepreneur. The Nigerian claims to have a large sum of money in need of laundering through an American bank, for which a commission is offered. If the victim agrees, the Nigerian writes a counterfeit check for more than the amount agreed to, and requests that the remainder be sent back as change.

As Miller recounts these schemes, he acknowledges there's not much the bureau can do to pursue them.

The complaints "don't rise to the level of other priorities" at the FBI, he said, pointing out that, though "$10,000 is a large amount of money to most of us," it's difficult for his agency to justify an intensive investigation to find the lost funds.

Miller said the bureau usually forwards complaints to local law enforcement, who are also unlikely to launch a costly investigation.

Miller warns consumers against advancing money to people whom they haven't conducted business with before, especially if the party is from outside the United States. The agent also cautions against unsolicited business proposals sent through e-mail.

In 2002, the FBI collaborated with the National White Collar Crime Center to produce the Internet Fraud Report.

The study revealed that more than 70 percent of complainants were between the ages of 20 and 50, and fewer than 9 percent were over 60.

These numbers diverge from fraud cases of other eras, which primarily involved senior citizens, Miller said.

Miller encourages all Internet fraud complainants to contact the bureau at 934-2444.

"We might know about a dozen other cases with similar circumstances," said Miller. "So in the aggregate, they might make a case."

Staff Writer Quintin Cushner can be reached by e-mail at qcushner@pulitzer.net



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/22/2003 10:31:03 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
The spy who invested in me. (only the best)
CNNfn Aleksandrs Rozens/Reuters January 6th, 1999

Fifteen years ago, Emin Gadzhiyev was a Soviet KGB case officer tracking NATO operations in Turkey, Robert Strang was a United States narcotics agent tracing drug money, and Fred Rustmann was a CIA case officer running intelligence missions between Thailand and Laos.

Today they are all helping Wall Street decide whether to invest in US companies and in emerging markets around the world. Wall Street banks and investors are seeking out former spies and law enforcement officials to help them do extensive background checks on individuals and companies seeking funds.

The KGB, the United States Drug Enforcement Administration, the Central Intelligence Agency, British intelligence, the US Federal Bureau of Investigation and Internal Revenue Service—all are sources of talent for nervous Wall Street insiders.

“The reason the industry has grown this decade is because of the end of the Cold War,” said Rustmann, a 24-year veteran of the CIA and chairman of West Palm Beach, Florida-based CTC International Group Inc. Gadzhiyev and six former CIA officers are on CTC’s payroll.

Firms such as Robert Strang’s New York-based Strang Hayes Consulting help investors investigate a company and its management prior to buying its bonds or stock.

The practice of conducting extensive background checks has increased as investors have stepped up investments overseas.

Investors “are waking up to the fact that they made serious mistakes in emerging markets,” said Robert Johnston, chief political risk analyst at Maryland-based Parvus Group. “They made investments in which they did not understand their partners," Johnston said. "They did not do adequate due diligence."

Former Cold War spies offer not only the ability to gather information in emerging markets but also the networks they developed when they were on a government’s payroll.

“We get to know people overseas when we work there. We are paid to liaise with these people…These contacts are very useful for a United States company which wants to establish itself overseas,” Rustmann said.

“Our contacts overseas and domestically are very important,” said Strang, whose firm includes former federal agents and government prosecutors. “You need international contacts and the only way to get these contacts is to have a background in this business.”

“A higher proportion of our assignments are overseas,” Ernest Brod, executive managing director of New York-based Kroll Associates.

The need to check up on private firms and their managers is not restricted to emerging markets; US companies and their management teams are also the subject of extensive checks.

Two portfolio managers with U.S. life insurers, who asked to remain anonymous, said they employ private investigators regularly before investing in a young company’s securities.

The manager of a large US buyout fund that makes investments totaling hundreds of millions of dollars said extra background checks are a necessity. For example, a Strang Hayes investigation found that the No. 2 executive of a firm looking for financial backing had been convicted of dealing cocaine.

“He was the most buttoned-down, straight-and-narrow kind of a guy…that was one (deal) we quickly walked away from,” said the manager, who asked to remain anonymous.

At least one United States-based rating agency employs private investigators to help with background checks when it rates a company’s securities. Richard Gugliada, a managing director at Standard & Poor’s Corp, said the firm used investigators to check up on managers in young private companies that are first-time issuers of certain types of securities. “S&P has used them in the past on rare occasions for background checks on senior management,” Gugliada said.

Firms such as Strang Hayes and Kroll Associates have also been retained for background checks on behalf of banks. Strang, who says his firm can come up with “due diligence” about a US company or its management team within two weeks, said red flags for lenders include undisclosed bankruptcies and fraud. He sifts through state and federal court documents and uses industry sources in the search for such problems.

Brod said officials as a now-defunct Wall Street brokerage found out background checks are a must after they did an initial public offering for a specialty airline only to discover that its fleet was actually a single plane repainted in various American cities to hoodwink bankers.

“Bank underwriters need to be sure that (issuers of stock) don’t have a track record of defrauding investors,” he said. Investigators’ work often involves confirming that a firm’s assets are real including checking to see that a real estate financing involves actual property. Investigators are also brought in to see if an overseas firm’s management has ties to local organized crime.

“We’ll make sure the company is real…and we’ll look at the people behind the company. We will make inquiries with the local authorities,” Brod said. This new match between Wall Street and former Cold War spies has provided inspiration for writers of thrillers such as John Le Carre, whose upcoming novel Single & Single offers a glimpse of banks managing money for organized crime groups in the former Soviet Union.

ctcintl.com 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/22/2003 4:23:42 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Hollywood Agent Paul Faces Stock Fraud Charges


NEW YORK (Reuters) - Peter Paul, a Hollywood agent who became the head of a company he founded with Stan Lee, the creator of the Spiderman comic book hero, pleaded not guilty on Monday to securities fraud charges.

Paul, 58, entered the plea in U.S. District Court in Brooklyn a week after he was extradited from Brazil, where he had been in hiding and then imprisoned since fleeing the United States two years ago.

Prosecutors charged Paul with being part of a "pump and dump" conspiracy that drove up the price of Stan Lee Media stock, then sold it before prices tumbled. They said Paul bilked investors out of some $25 million.

If he is convicted, he faces up to 15 years in prison and millions of dollars in fines.

Stan Lee Media is named after Spiderman creator Stan Lee, who also created the Incredible Hulk and X-Men. Paul helped create the company and served as president until the stock became worthless and the company went bankrupt.

Lee himself has not been accused of any wrongdoing.

Three others have been charged and are awaiting trial, according to court papers.



09/22/03 15:52 ET



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/22/2003 5:53:32 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Getting burned in boiler rooms
Money


Published: 18-Sep-2003
By: Justin Webster


You may think you'd know a dodgy investment when you saw one. But would you know what a Boiler Room was -- and what it did?



The Boiler Room -- as it's known -- is a high pressure sales operation pushing potentially worthless shares to anyone who'll buy them.



They were highly lucrative in the Far East in the late 1990s, but now Channel 4 News has discovered that this new breed of global fraudster has moved into Britain's time zone.



The Financial Services Authority says it's getting 20 calls a week from investors who've been cold called and lost money to these scams.



We've infiltrated one based in Barcelona - Justin Webster has this exclusive report.



Meet Henry Howard, the manager of a very special type of office. He's an expert in high pressure sales.



His speciality is in tricking people out of their savings in exchange for virtually worthless shares. His team of workers are at a secret location in Spain, cold calling Britain. Henry Howard isn't his real name, but nothing is what it seems in a so-called Boiler Room: except the pressure to get rich.



Steve Oliver is Channel 4 News' man on the inside. Working undercover, he's landed a tough job selling shares for Henry Howard.



For the first time a tv camera reveals a Boiler Room at work. Like the other ten salesmen in the office, Steve is on commission. Unwary UK investors are merely voices on the end of a phone.



Steve: It's reasonably jovial, not exactly fun everyone is laughing about how much they can get out of people.



And Justin Webster is Channel 4 News' reporter on the outside. With Steve bringing his evidence after work Steve and Justin can piece together the details of this Boiler Room scam and find out why they are thriving.



Web forums and message boards testify to the anguish they are causing. British Police say a different scam operation netted £7 million in Britain alone, with up to a thousand victims.



Victim of Boiler Room scam: I invested £3,750 approximately and I'm extremely gutted.



Carol Sergeant, Managing Director, Financial Services Authority (FSA): The number of operations which have been reported has gone up, and the number of operations reported when we think it is a scam has gone up around threefold in the last few years.



That sudden rise has a cause. The Boiler Room boom usually associated with the Far East, has arrived in Britain's time zone.



Channel 4 News has discovered that Barcelona is the new Boiler capital - up to sixty of these operations have decamped to the Mediterranean and are targeting Britain.



Why have they come here? The authorities don't seem to bother them. They can draw on a large pool of labour - young English tourists, backpackers, people looking for a way of earning some fast cash.



Cheap flights make it easy to get to, and cheap telecommunications make it easy to call from. There's also plenty of rentable office space.



Day one and Steve makes sure he's on time. If he's late by more than a minute he could be sacked. He's been told his job is to make 50 calls a day. The office supplies him with the names and numbers. Already he's been instructed to lie, giving a false name and a false location.



Steve: Hello I'm David Simms from Franklin Asset Management, We have our head office in Hong Kong and I'm actually calling you from Viena, in Austria where we have another of our key offices.



And there are strict rules - don't leave messages, it's all calling out, no calling in.



Henry Howard: You don't want them calling in, email's fine but you don't want them calling in because they'll get an idiot German girl and if they start quizzing her she'll fall apart.



So Steve sets to work for the imposing sounding Franklin Asset Management.



The one share on offer is going for just over three dollars - in a company called Oxford Software Developers. With the aid of a script he's coached by Henry Howard to sell it as a stock set to go through the roof.



Henry Howard: So here's where you want to go into it, it's going to be an ummmph stock



Steve: what does that mean?



Henry Howard: Money. It's going to be a $20 dollar stock. We'll recommend when to buy and what's more we'll recommend when to sell.



They like that! If you have got this far you should have the guy. And if the hapless investor is reluctant to part with his cash, Henry Howard knows all the moves.



Henry Howard: He's going to hit you with his objections, I need to show my wife, my dog's got diarrhea, I'm not sure what he'll think of it (laughter) my neighbour's house just burnt down, they will come up with the most incredible amount of bullshit you have ever heard in your life about why they can't do it now.



And finally, ‘Don't worry’, he tells Steve, no angry buyer will ever catch up with him.



Steve: So they won't get back to me?



Henry Howard: How's he going to find you? Look up David Simms in the fund book in Barcelona when you're in Austria - from England?



So once an investor has taken the bait, how are they lured into buying? Steve's passed us documents from inside.



Franklin Asset Management - unconnected to any similar sounding reputable business - directs its prey to their professional seeming website.



The grand offices it claims in Vienna and Hong Kong: when we checked them out, turned out to be just a message taking services.



And what are they selling? Shares in a Canadian company called Oxford Software Developers. Hits all the rights buttons, it’s an internet gambling business that's moving into exciting new products. Steve tells investors to check the share price on the web.



That often reassures them - but look more closely and the price is almost meaningless, because no one has traded in these shares for months.



So we took the Oxford's accounts to a leading city expert and asked for his verdict on the company and its shares.



Emile Woolf, Head of Forensic Accounting at Kingston Smith: The key message in final paragraph: The company has generated insufficient income to cover its expenses and has accumulated losses in the year to December 2002, which is the date of these accounts, of $2.9m.



And here is the key sentence: These conditions raise substantial doubts the company's ability to continue as a going concern. Now if you wanted a three-star warning for any company let alone this company, that is the signal.



It's a company that can issue an unlimited number of shares. The first shares it sold, three years ago, were valued at less than a thousanth of a cent. Franklin is now offering them at more than 300,000 times that price, at a little over $3.



It wouldn't mean that if bought say 1,000 shares in this company, I would be able to sell them at 3.40.



Emile Woolf: No, that's the quoted price but it doesn't mean that anyone is going to buy them at that price.



The conclusion after looking at these extensive accounts is that there's nothing that amounts to an investment, it looks dangerous.



That's a verdict with which the Boiler's Room manager privately agrees.



Oxford Software Developers told Channel 4 News in a formal statement "Our Company has no knowledge of, or any dealings with "Franklin Asset Management.



“We cannot control overseas firms that wish to promote our stock offerings."



There is no suggestion that Oxford is aware of the Boiler Room's techniques. Boiler Rooms regularly hijack shares in legitimate companies.



And in Barcelona Henry Howard's daily mission is to get his salesmen to shift more product. How do the workers feel about it? When Steve's hints he's worried about ripping people off, they tell him not to be soft.



Salesman: I was talking to this 11-year-old daughter on the phone getting her mobile number so I could call her Mum. If I got under the skin of these people and started thinking about what's going on I'd never do this. Everything's there, they get the shares, they receive everything, we are just telling them a bunch of shit so they buy.



Henry Howard: Everyone in this game thinks the same thing. What are these people doing sending me £10,000 on a fucking phone call, are they insane? You can't let yourself think like that.



Steve escapes for a moment from the pressure. With the scam so blatant he decides to risk asking his boss a moral question.



Steve: You were telling me when we first met you've got to be ruthless, leave my conscience at the door. Maybe I have a problem with that.



Henry Howard: Everybody does, everybody does but, you've just got to leave it out when you come in here, if you want to make money you haven't got time for that shit.



So how can financial fraudsters set up so easily in Barcelona? Officially Spain's regulators should clamp down on them, but if they don't rip off Spaniard's, they are beyond the law. Boilers jump through a huge legal loophole; Spain's police are powerless to act.



Spanish National Police spokesman: It is not a crime to carry on this activity, if it's not physically in our territory and it doesn't affect Spaniards. The money doesn't come through here, all you've got is a bloke on the phone. If it doesn't hurt any Spaniards, it's not a crime.



So British victims can't expect much foreign help. And shame stops many talking out publicly. This first time investor - victim of different Boiler Room scam - agreed to talk to us unnamed.



Victim (unnamed): I regard myself as a sensible clever person that laughs at people on the tv which have been ripped off believing that it will never happen to me and lo and behold my first purchase of shares it's happened.



In London, the Financial Services Authority is getting 20 calls a week from Boiler Room victims. In April, the FSA published a warning list of un-authorised firms calling into Britain. So are they breaking British law?



Carol Sergeant, Managing Director, Financial Services Authority (FSA): If they are cold calling to people in the UK, that is illegal, if they are offering advice to people in the UK without being authorised in the UK which they are not, that is illegal. We believe the average loss to be around £3-5,000, this is very tentative but we know of people, a small number of people who have lost up to £100,000.



What would you say to people who say the FSA is a toothless watchdog in this case?



Carol Sergeant: We would like to do more for them but if this mischief has occured in Ruritania and Ruritania doesn't have a decent legal system and the money has evaporated we can't do anything for them.



Henry Howard: It works, believe me it fucking works. I don't know if I was telling you about these people who drive around in fucking Porsches, there are loads of them in this town in the other shops, we're a new shop



Salesman: Simon made 30,000 US working here



Henry Howard: People are susceptible to being pitched, they are susceptible to that. So stop thinking about what you'd do if I was there, you're on the other side of the fucking fence. What you have got to do is to get him to do what I want.



After a gruelling week, Steve makes his exit. He's been driven hard and he's come dangerously close to making sales. Knowing how Franklin operates, we confronted Henry Howard to ask him about the scam.



Justin Webster: Henry? Why are you defrauding British investors? I'm Justin Webster from Channel 4 News. Why are you running an illegal Boiler Room from Barcelona? Why are you selling dodgy shares?



Henry Howard: Who says they are dodgy?



Justin Webster: Well would you say they are high risk shares?



Henry Howard: Venture capital, high risk.



Justin Webster: Are you regulated financial company?



Henry Howard: We don't need to be regulated.



Justin Webster: You don't need to be regulated here in Spain?



Henry Howard: Don't need to be regulated anywhere.



Justin Webster: Don't need to be regulated anywhere? Does the FSA know about you?



Henry Howard: I'm sure they do.



Justin Webster: And are they happy with what you are doing?



Henry Howard: Probably not.



Justin Webster: Why do you use a false name? Why do you say you are calling from Austria when you are in fact in Barcelona? Can you answer these questions.



Henry Howard: I don't think I'm obliged to talk to you.



Boiler Room managers like Henry Howard can walk away quite calmly. Laws lag way behind this new type of global fraudster.







Channel 4 News asked Franklin Asset Management for its response to the allegations in our report:



In a statement, the company said that it could not contact Henry Howard, but said "as far as we know Henry runs a training facility that helps individuals progress in the investments related industry".



It added that ... "no cold calls are made from Barcelona. Maybe they use false names while calling each other on interoffice calls, we have no idea. This practise is sometimes used so trainees are not aware they are calling other trainees".



The company denied misleading potential customers about the location of the caller and that it was inflating the value and investment potential of the shares being sold, saying "possibly the reverse, (we're) selling at a slight discount to market".



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/22/2003 10:26:16 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Goelo, you are a sad pos.->MAS ACQUISITION XVII CORP
=====================================================

Text:Dizon Investments International

 
  Records 1 - 2.   Sort by clicking on the column headings.  

  Company Name Form Type Received Period Views  
 1.   TIANRONG INTERNET PRODUCTS & SERVICES INC  
Filed As: MAS ACQUISITION XVII CORP
8-K   3/7/2000    3/6/2000   HTML | ORIG | RTF    
 2.   TIANRONG BUILDING MATERIAL HOLDINGS LTD /UT/  
Filed As: MAS ACQUISITION XVIII CORP
8-K   3/7/2000    3/6/2000   HTML | ORIG | RTF    

     
Go to page  [1]


TIANRONG INTERNET PRODUCT ...
 Form: 8-K  Filing Date: 3/7/2000  

2)(3) Includes 2,500,00 shares owned Dizon Investments International, Inc., a company of which James Tilton is an officer and director and 50,000,000 of Tianrong Building Material Holdings, Ltd., a company of which Tilton is an officer and director, and, which is also the parent of TIPS.

=============================================

Dizon Investments International Incorporation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------20 August 1998
SFC Takes Action Against Unregistered Securities Dealer

The Securities and Futures Commission announced that it had successfully prosecuted Ms Yu Hung Wai, Angel (Yu) and Mr Lo Wai Tai (Lo) for unregistered securities dealing activities in contravention of Section 48 of the Securities Ordinance.

Yu and Lo pleaded guilty before Mr A Wyeth at South Kowloon Magistracy on 20 August 1998. They were each fined $3,000 for carrying on an unregistered business of securities dealing. In addition to the fines imposed, the defendants were each ordered to pay costs of $5,000 to the SFC.

The SFC investigation revealed that during the period June 1997 to January 1998, Yu and Lo while in the employment of the Hong Kong office of Dizon Investments International Incorporation (Dizon), an investment company incorporated in the United States of America, sold United States securities to clients in Hong Kong. Dizon, its Hong Kong office, Yu and Lo are not registered with the SFC in any capacity.

For further information, please contact Bill Weeks at 2840-9287 or Chan Chi-keung at 2842-7624.



MAS ACQUISITION XVII CORP

The following names appear in MAS ACQUISITION XVII CORP's SEC filings. Click on an individual's name to show a list of all documents containing a discussion of this individual. You will then be able to use EDGAR Online People to explore **inside** each document to find executive compensation, corporate biographies, stock options - anywhere an individual's name is mentioned!

AARON, TSAI
SUBLOO, SHANE
TSAI, AARON
TSAI, JOHN


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act

March 6, 2000

Date of Report

(Date of Earliest Event Reported)

TIANRONG INTERNET PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
8 West 38th Street 9th Floor New York, New York 10018

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

212/398-7833

212/398-8695 (fax)

(Registrant's Telephone Number)


MAS ACQUISITION XVII CORP.


1710 E. Division St.

Evansville, IN 47711

(Former Name and Former Address)

New Jersey 000-27165 22-1644111
---------- --------- ----------
(State or other (Commission (IRS Employer
jurisdiction of incorporation) File Number) Identification No.)



  ITEM 1. CHANGES IN CONTROL OF REGISTRANT (a) Pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") effective March 6, 2000, Tianrong Internet Products and Services, Inc., a New Jersey corporation ("TIPS" or, the "Company"), acquired 8,250,000 outstanding shares of MAS XVII Corp ("MAS XVII") from MAS Capital, Inc., a shareholder thereof, for Two Hundred Thousand ($200,000) Dollars. As a result, MAS XVII became a majority-owned subsidiary of TIPS. The Stock Purchase Agreement was approved by the unanimous consent of the Board of Directors of TIPS on March 6, 2000.
1
Prior to the Agreement, TIPS had 75,540,472 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and, 75,540,472 shares issued and outstanding following the Agreement. TIPS was incorporated in the State of New Jersey on January 29, 1959. Upon effectiveness of the Agreement, pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) of the General Rules and Regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, TIPS became the successor issuer to MAS XVII for reporting purposes under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and elects to report under the Act effective March 6, 2000. A copy of the Stock Purchase Agreement is filed as an exhibit to this Form 8-K and is incorporated in its entirety herein. The foregoing description is modified by such reference. (b) The following table contains information regarding the shareholdings of the Company's current directors and executive officers and those persons or entities who beneficially own more than 5% of the Company's common stock:
NAME AMOUNT OF COMMON STOCK PERCENT OF COMMON STOCK
BENEFICIALLY OWNED(1) BENEFICIALLY OWNED


James A. Tilton 52,828,339(2) 70%
President,
Director

All directors and 52,828,339(2)(3) 70%
executive officers
as a group
(2 persons)

DIZON Investments

International, Inc. 2,500,000(4) 03%
8 West 38th St.
New York, NY 10018

Tianrong Building 50,000,000(5) 66%
Material Holdings, Ltd.
8 West 38th St.
New York, NY 10018

Xiang Gao 920,000 01%
11859 NE 162 Land
Bothell, WA 98011




2
(1) Based upon 75,540,472 outstanding shares of common stock. (2)(3) Includes 2,500,00 shares owned Dizon Investments International, Inc., a company of which James Tilton is an officer and director and 50,000,000 of Tianrong Building Material Holdings, Ltd., a company of which Tilton is an officer and director, and, which is also the parent of TIPS. (4) A company of which James Tilton is an officer and director. (5) Is a company of which James Tilton is an officer and director and is the parent company of TIPS. COMPANY'S BUSINESS AND SUBSIDIARIES Tianrong Internet Products and Services, Inc. (OTCBB:TIPS) is a U.S. holding company whose strategy is the acquisition of domestic and international Internet Service Providers and related companies. TIPS owns five development stage, Internet related companies. A-Web Internet Services (http://www.aweb.com), established in 1995, is an Internet service provider in the city of New York. A-Web provides a wide range of Internet access and services, for its on-line consumers. AAAMall.net ("http://www.aaamall.net), is an electronic commerce outsourcing and direct marketing company dedicated to making e-Commerce a reality for all businesses. The technology, innovative merchant services, and extensive distribution channels have been designed to help companies effectively conduct business online. On July 20th, 1999, the company acquired of ChinaMalls, Inc. ("http://www.chinamalls.com"), which is an E-Commerce company dedicated to helping merchants, resellers, shoppers, and partners of the global Chinese market sell and buy products online. The site has over 2700 items for sale in 16 different categories. The company offers complete bilingual turnkey solutions for commerce enabled storefronts through our merchant, reseller, affiliate, consultant and partner programs. ChinaMalls provides thousands of products, including VCDs, CDs, books, electronics, jewelry, health products, art, home and garden. On October 25, 1999, Tianrong Internet Products and Services, Inc, acquired Chongqing Word Technology Co., Ltd., a mainland China based Internet service provider and e-commerce developer. On January 19, 2000, Tianrong Internet Products and Services, Inc. announced its plans to launch a new Internet Telephony company, Phonecalls.com, Inc. The new company will be a wholly owned subsidiary of TIPS and conduct business on the Internet as: phonecalls.com.  Phonecalls.com will offer to consumers the opportunity to purchase on-line, prepaid phonecards with instant PIN #s. This will allow customers to use the prepaid phonecards at the time of purchase. The Company will offer low priced and quality service throughout the World by using both Internet and telecommunication technology.
3
(Additional information can be obtained from our web site, tipsstock.com.)  However, TIPS presently operates at a loss and has not received revenues from operations sufficient to maintain its operations. TIPS has raised funds for operations through the sale of its securities. See "RISK FACTORS".



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/29/2003 3:07:52 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
DON'T BE TEMPTED BY SHARES SCAM

People in Warwickshire are being targeted by an investment scam based on a Hollywood film.

The film Boiler Room tells the story of a company using hard sell tactics to persuade investors to buy shares in worthless companies.
Warwickshire Trading Standards has received reports of companies which say they are based in Austria contacting consumers and businesses and offering shares in American companies.
Potential investors are told they could gain £60,00 in return for a £3,000 investment.
Trading standards director Noel Hunter said: "If an investment opportunity seems to good to be true it usually is.
"Don't be tempted by the promise of huge returns - the shares you receive are likely to be worthless.
"Whilst you lose out, those selling the shares will make hefty profits from the commission you will pay."
The companies may be operating from abroad to avoid UK rules to protect consumers and trading standards is warning people that if they show an interest they could be flooded with calls.
Sales staff are on commission and can use tactics from flattery and offers of free gifts and bullying and threats.



29 September 2003



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)9/29/2003 5:49:55 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Oh the weather outside is frightful
But the fire is so delightful
And since we've no place to go
Let It Snow! Let It Snow! Let It Snow!

It doesn't show signs of stopping
And I've bought some corn for popping
The lights are turned way down low
Let It Snow! Let It Snow! Let It Snow!

When we finally kiss goodnight
How I'll hate going out in the storm!
But if you'll really hold me tight
All the way home I'll be warm

The fire is slowly dying
And, my dear, we're still goodbying
But as long as you love me so
Let It Snow! Let It Snow! Let It Snow!



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/1/2003 10:07:04 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Securities and Exchange Commission v. 2DoTrade, Inc., George Russell Taylor, Barry William Gewin aka Barry Peters, Eric T. Landis, Dominic Roelandt, Michael D. Karsch, L. Van Stillman, David A. Wood, Jr., Clinton Walker, Oxford and Hayes, Ltd., FG & P Consulting, Ltd., Hackney Holdings, Ltd., Weston Partners, Inc., Infiniti Corporate Services, Ltd., Argo Financial, Ltd., 21st Equity Partners, Inc., MCG Partners, Inc., and LMR, Ltd., Civil Action Number 3:03-CV-2246-N(Godbey) (N.D. Texas, Dallas Division)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Craig J. Shaber, Stephen R. Wright, and Bonaventure Capital, Ltd., defendants, and Aspen International Marketing, Inc. and Wright & Geis, Inc., relief defendants. Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-2247-G(Fish) (N.D. Texas, Dallas Division).
SEC Files Lawsuit Against 2DoTrade, Inc., Its President, Several Stock Promoters, and Two Attorneys In Bogus Anti-Anthrax, Pump-and-Dump Scheme -- Also Files Related Lawsuit Against California Attorney and Accountant for $7.5 million "Shell-Factory" Scheme


U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Litigation Release No. 18381 / September 30, 2003
Securities and Exchange Commission v. 2DoTrade, Inc., George Russell Taylor, Barry William Gewin aka Barry Peters, Eric T. Landis, Dominic Roelandt, Michael D. Karsch, L. Van Stillman, David A. Wood, Jr., Clinton Walker, Oxford and Hayes, Ltd., FG & P Consulting, Ltd., Hackney Holdings, Ltd., Weston Partners, Inc., Infiniti Corporate Services, Ltd., Argo Financial, Ltd., 21st Equity Partners, Inc., MCG Partners, Inc., and LMR, Ltd., Civil Action Number 3:03-CV-2246-N(Godbey) (N.D. Texas, Dallas Division)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Craig J. Shaber, Stephen R. Wright, and Bonaventure Capital, Ltd., defendants, and Aspen International Marketing, Inc. and Wright & Geis, Inc., relief defendants. Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-2247-G(Fish) (N.D. Texas, Dallas Division).
SEC Files Lawsuit Against 2DoTrade, Inc., Its President, Several Stock Promoters, and Two Attorneys In Bogus Anti-Anthrax, Pump-and-Dump Scheme -- Also Files Related Lawsuit Against California Attorney and Accountant for $7.5 million "Shell-Factory" Scheme

On September 30, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a lawsuit against 2DoTrade, Inc., its president, several recidivist stock promoters, and two attorneys in a "pump-and-dump" market-manipulation case. 2DoTrade is an SEC-reporting company whose stock was formerly quoted publicly on the OTC Bulletin Board. According to the SEC's complaint, from July to November 2001, the defendants engaged in a fraudulent scheme in which they artificially pumped 2DoTrade's stock with false press releases, spam e-mail, and a fraudulent website and then illegally dumped millions of shares into the inflated market. At one point in the scheme-amid recurring reports of fatal anthrax attacks in the United States-several of the defendants sought to profit from the nation's fear of terrorism with false press releases about 2DoTrade's purported imminent distribution of an anti-anthrax compound in the United States. In a separate civil lawsuit filed on the same day, the SEC alleged securities fraud and other violations against a California attorney and accountant who created and sold the public shell company used in the 2DoTrade scheme.

The 2DoTrade complaint alleges that, in June 2001, defendants Barry W. Gewin, 36, of Enon Valley, Pennsylvania, Eric T. Landis, 38, of Charlottesville, Virginia, and Dominic Roelandt, 26, of Dehderhoutem, Belgium, gained de facto control of 2DoTrade-a shell company with no assets or revenue-by acquiring control over virtually all of its "free-trading" stock. Then, in collusion with 2DoTrade's president, defendant George R. Taylor of Ayrshire, Scotland, they manipulated 2DoTrade's stock price in two fraudulent promotional campaigns. The first campaign, which took place in July and August 2001, touted 2DoTrade's ownership of certain import/export contracts supposedly worth $300 million. In reality, these contracts were worthless. The second campaign, which began in October 2001, claimed that 2DoTrade was testing an anti-anthrax compound called "ATHOQ" at a hospital and a university in the United Kingdom for imminent distribution in the United States. In reality, ATHOQ was a sham, and no anthrax testing or product distribution ever occurred.

During the bogus-contract campaign, the defendants dumped millions of shares into the market, collectively realizing approximately $1.6 million in trading profits. As the defendant's sold their shares, the share price gradually declined by the end of August 2001. Beginning on October 31, 2001, however, the bogus anti-anthrax campaign drove up 2DoTrade's stock price again, this time by approximately 400%. During this period, certain defendants dumped over 700,000 shares into the market, for which they collectively received approximately $240,000. An SEC trading suspension on November 6, 2001, halted trading in 2DoTrade's stock and prevented some of the defendants from dumping millions of additional shares.

Other defendants named in the SEC's 2DoTrade complaint are:

Oxford and Hayes, Ltd., DBE Consulting, Ltd., and FG&P Consulting, Ltd., three Belize-registered companies controlled by Gewin. Gewin used offshore accounts in their names to sell approximately 869,000 shares of 2DoTrade stock during the fraudulent promotional campaigns, realizing approximately $318,288 in ill-gotten gains.

Infiniti Corporate Services, Ltd., a Bahamas corporation, and Argo Financial, Ltd., a Cayman Islands corporation, both controlled by Roelandt. Roelandt used offshore accounts in their names to sell approximately 1.85 million 2DoTrade shares during the fraudulent promotional campaigns, realizing approximately $474,005 in ill-gotten gains.

Hackney Holdings, Ltd., a Cayman Islands corporation, and Weston Partners, Inc., a Connecticut corporation, both controlled by Landis. Landis used domestic and offshore accounts in their names to sell 216,000 2DoTrade shares during the fraudulent promotional campaigns, realizing approximately $154,300 in ill-gotten gains.

MCG Partners, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Michael Karsch, 41, an attorney licensed in Florida, Texas, and New York. Karsch was a managing director of MCG Partners, which provided $450,000 to Gewin, Roelandt, and Landis for the purchase of an OTC Bulletin Board shell company, which ultimately became 2DoTrade. In exchange for the $450,000, Karsch and MCG Partners received 1.1 million 2DoTrade shares and a guarantee that other defendants would sustain 2DoTrade's stock price by touting the bogus contracts in a promotional campaign. Under this arrangement, MCG Partners sold 1.1 million shares for approximately $555,191, realizing a profit of approximately $105,191. Karsch received a share of these profits.

21st Equity Partners, Inc., a North Carolina corporation, its president David A. Wood, Jr., 50, of Charlotte, North Carolina, and its vice-president Clinton Walker, 33, also of Charlotte. On June 26, 2001, Wood and Walker orchestrated a manipulative matched trade with Gewin and Landis to artificially set the initial market price of 2DoTrade stock at $1.25. Wood offered and sold approximately 293,000 2DoTrade shares through a 21st Equity Partners account for approximately $154,670. Walker received at least 101,350 shares of 2DoTrade stock, which he sold for approximately $52,520.

L. Van Stillman, 54, an attorney licensed in Florida and Pennsylvania, and LMR, Ltd., an offshore company that he controlled. Stillman prepared false SEC filings on behalf of 2DoTrade, concealing Gewin, Landis, and Roelandt's beneficial ownership of 2DoTrade's stock. Stillman sold approximately 192,000 2DoTrade shares, mostly through an LMR, Ltd. brokerage account in Bermuda, realizing approximately $95,370 in ill-gotten trading profits.

Several of the 2DoTrade defendants have prior disciplinary histories. In 1992, Taylor was convicted in the United Kingdom of conspiracy to commit theft. Roelandt was enjoined in August 2000 by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Arizona for securities fraud in an action bought by the SEC, and in 2001, in another unrelated SEC action, he received an administrative penny-stock bar from the SEC. In 1999, the NASD suspended Landis' brokerage license for one year and fined him for market manipulation. And in 1998, Wood was the subject of an SEC cease-and-desist order for violations of the anti-touting provisions of the federal securities laws.

The Commission's complaint alleges that defendant 2DoTrade violated the securities-registration, anti-fraud, and issuer-reporting provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically, sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, and 13a-13 thereunder. It alleges that defendant Taylor violated the anti-fraud provisions and aided and abetted 2DoTrade's violations of the issuer reporting provisions. It alleges that defendants Gewin, Roelandt, and Landis, and the defendant companies they controlled, violated the securities-registration and anti-fraud provisions and also the beneficial-ownership and principal-shareholder reporting provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically, sections 13(d) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1, 16a-2, and 16a-3 thereunder. And it alleges that defendants, Karsch, Stillman, Wood, and Walker, and the defendant companies under their control, violated the securities-registration and anti-fraud provisions and that Stillman also aided and abetted 2DoTrade's violations of the issuer reporting provisions of the federal securities laws.

The SEC seeks, among other relief, permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with pre-judgment interest, and civil money penalties against all the defendants; officer-and-director bars against Taylor, Gewin, Roelandt, and Wood; penny-stock bars against Taylor, Gewin, Roelandt, Wood, Walker, and Karsch; and an order enjoining Roelandt from violating section 15(b)(6)(B) of the Exchange Act, which prohibits participation in a penny-stock offering in contravention of an SEC order.

The Fraudulent "Shell Factory"

Also on September 30, 2003, the SEC filed a related lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas against Craig J. Shaber, 45, a California-licensed attorney and Stephen R. Wright, 57, an accountant, both from the San Diego, California area. According to the complaint, from 1998 to 2002, Shaber and Wright engaged in an elaborate scheme to manufacture and sell 18 public shell companies, from which they derived at least $7.5 million in ill-gotten gains. To carry out the "shell factory" scheme, Shaber and Wright installed nominee officers and directors in dormant corporations that they controlled and caused these companies to submit false registration statements and reports to the SEC and the NASD, Inc. These false documents gave the bogus companies the appearance of legitimacy and permitted their securities to be eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board.

Among other things, the false registration statements and reports contained phony business plans, misrepresented the identity of the companies' true officers and directors, and contained false shareholder lists. In reality, Shaber and Wright owned virtually all of the companies' stock, and the individual shareholders listed in the documents were merely nominees for Shaber and Wright. In addition, Shaber and Wright served as the de facto officers and directors of the companies and intended not to pursue the stated business plans, but rather, to sell their controlling blocks of shares-and thus control of the shell companies-to stock promoters and other buyers for substantial profits. Shaber and Wright sold one of these fraudulently manufactured companies, Moranzo, Inc., for approximately $600,000 to certain 2DoTrade defendants, who then used it to create 2DoTrade and carry out that scheme.

The other defendant and relief defendants in the Shaber and Wright case are:

Bonaventure Capital, Ltd., defendant, a private Nevada corporation controlled by Shaber and Wright. Through Bonaventure Capital, Shaber and Wright maintained a bank account into which they deposited the funds from the sale of the stock in the public shell companies and maintained a brokerage account through which they sold securities in the public shell entities. Shaber and Wright, and entities they individually controlled, shared in the ill-gotten proceeds from the Bonaventure Capital accounts.

Wright & Geis, Inc., relief defendant, is a California corporation solely owned by Wright. It received at least $100,000 from a Bonaventure Capital bank account as proceeds from the scheme.

Aspen International Marketing, Inc., relief defendant, is a Nevada corporation owned by Shaber. It received at least $1 million in proceeds from the fraudulent scheme.

The complaint alleges that Shaber, Wright, and Bonaventure Capital violated the securities-registration, anti-fraud, beneficial-ownership, and principal-shareholder reporting provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically, sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and sections 10(b), 13(d), and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 13d-1, 16a-2, and 16a-3 thereunder. It further alleges that they aided and abetted violations of the issuer-reporting provisions, specifically, sections 13(a) of Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder. The SEC seeks disgorgement with prejudgment interest from each defendant and relief defendant and further seeks permanent injunctions, an accounting, and officer-and-director bars against defendants Shaber and Wright.

The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, the British Columbia Securities Commission, the Police Department of Tayside, Scotland, the London Metropolitan Police Department, the Hampshire Constabulary in England, the FBI's Dallas Field Office, and the United States Department of Justice in the investigation of this matter.

SEC Complaint in this matter



sec.gov 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 10/01/2003



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/1/2003 12:05:49 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
MUCH NEEDED->"The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, the British Columbia Securities Commission, the Police Department of Tayside, Scotland, the London Metropolitan Police Department, the Hampshire Constabulary in England, the FBI's Dallas Field Office, and the United States Department of Justice in the investigation of this matter."


U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Litigation Release No. 18381 / September 30, 2003
Securities and Exchange Commission v. 2DoTrade, Inc., George Russell Taylor, Barry William Gewin aka Barry Peters, Eric T. Landis, Dominic Roelandt, Michael D. Karsch, L. Van Stillman, David A. Wood, Jr., Clinton Walker, Oxford and Hayes, Ltd., FG & P Consulting, Ltd., Hackney Holdings, Ltd., Weston Partners, Inc., Infiniti Corporate Services, Ltd., Argo Financial, Ltd., 21st Equity Partners, Inc., MCG Partners, Inc., and LMR, Ltd., Civil Action Number 3:03-CV-2246-N(Godbey) (N.D. Texas, Dallas Division)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Craig J. Shaber, Stephen R. Wright, and Bonaventure Capital, Ltd., defendants, and Aspen International Marketing, Inc. and Wright & Geis, Inc., relief defendants. Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-2247-G(Fish) (N.D. Texas, Dallas Division).
SEC Files Lawsuit Against 2DoTrade, Inc., Its President, Several Stock Promoters, and Two Attorneys In Bogus Anti-Anthrax, Pump-and-Dump Scheme -- Also Files Related Lawsuit Against California Attorney and Accountant for $7.5 million "Shell-Factory" Scheme

On September 30, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a lawsuit against 2DoTrade, Inc., its president, several recidivist stock promoters, and two attorneys in a "pump-and-dump" market-manipulation case. 2DoTrade is an SEC-reporting company whose stock was formerly quoted publicly on the OTC Bulletin Board. According to the SEC's complaint, from July to November 2001, the defendants engaged in a fraudulent scheme in which they artificially pumped 2DoTrade's stock with false press releases, spam e-mail, and a fraudulent website and then illegally dumped millions of shares into the inflated market. At one point in the scheme-amid recurring reports of fatal anthrax attacks in the United States-several of the defendants sought to profit from the nation's fear of terrorism with false press releases about 2DoTrade's purported imminent distribution of an anti-anthrax compound in the United States. In a separate civil lawsuit filed on the same day, the SEC alleged securities fraud and other violations against a California attorney and accountant who created and sold the public shell company used in the 2DoTrade scheme.

The 2DoTrade complaint alleges that, in June 2001, defendants Barry W. Gewin, 36, of Enon Valley, Pennsylvania, Eric T. Landis, 38, of Charlottesville, Virginia, and Dominic Roelandt, 26, of Dehderhoutem, Belgium, gained de facto control of 2DoTrade-a shell company with no assets or revenue-by acquiring control over virtually all of its "free-trading" stock. Then, in collusion with 2DoTrade's president, defendant George R. Taylor of Ayrshire, Scotland, they manipulated 2DoTrade's stock price in two fraudulent promotional campaigns. The first campaign, which took place in July and August 2001, touted 2DoTrade's ownership of certain import/export contracts supposedly worth $300 million. In reality, these contracts were worthless. The second campaign, which began in October 2001, claimed that 2DoTrade was testing an anti-anthrax compound called "ATHOQ" at a hospital and a university in the United Kingdom for imminent distribution in the United States. In reality, ATHOQ was a sham, and no anthrax testing or product distribution ever occurred.

During the bogus-contract campaign, the defendants dumped millions of shares into the market, collectively realizing approximately $1.6 million in trading profits. As the defendant's sold their shares, the share price gradually declined by the end of August 2001. Beginning on October 31, 2001, however, the bogus anti-anthrax campaign drove up 2DoTrade's stock price again, this time by approximately 400%. During this period, certain defendants dumped over 700,000 shares into the market, for which they collectively received approximately $240,000. An SEC trading suspension on November 6, 2001, halted trading in 2DoTrade's stock and prevented some of the defendants from dumping millions of additional shares.

Other defendants named in the SEC's 2DoTrade complaint are:

Oxford and Hayes, Ltd., DBE Consulting, Ltd., and FG&P Consulting, Ltd., three Belize-registered companies controlled by Gewin. Gewin used offshore accounts in their names to sell approximately 869,000 shares of 2DoTrade stock during the fraudulent promotional campaigns, realizing approximately $318,288 in ill-gotten gains.

Infiniti Corporate Services, Ltd., a Bahamas corporation, and Argo Financial, Ltd., a Cayman Islands corporation, both controlled by Roelandt. Roelandt used offshore accounts in their names to sell approximately 1.85 million 2DoTrade shares during the fraudulent promotional campaigns, realizing approximately $474,005 in ill-gotten gains.

Hackney Holdings, Ltd., a Cayman Islands corporation, and Weston Partners, Inc., a Connecticut corporation, both controlled by Landis. Landis used domestic and offshore accounts in their names to sell 216,000 2DoTrade shares during the fraudulent promotional campaigns, realizing approximately $154,300 in ill-gotten gains.

MCG Partners, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Michael Karsch, 41, an attorney licensed in Florida, Texas, and New York. Karsch was a managing director of MCG Partners, which provided $450,000 to Gewin, Roelandt, and Landis for the purchase of an OTC Bulletin Board shell company, which ultimately became 2DoTrade. In exchange for the $450,000, Karsch and MCG Partners received 1.1 million 2DoTrade shares and a guarantee that other defendants would sustain 2DoTrade's stock price by touting the bogus contracts in a promotional campaign. Under this arrangement, MCG Partners sold 1.1 million shares for approximately $555,191, realizing a profit of approximately $105,191. Karsch received a share of these profits.

21st Equity Partners, Inc., a North Carolina corporation, its president David A. Wood, Jr., 50, of Charlotte, North Carolina, and its vice-president Clinton Walker, 33, also of Charlotte. On June 26, 2001, Wood and Walker orchestrated a manipulative matched trade with Gewin and Landis to artificially set the initial market price of 2DoTrade stock at $1.25. Wood offered and sold approximately 293,000 2DoTrade shares through a 21st Equity Partners account for approximately $154,670. Walker received at least 101,350 shares of 2DoTrade stock, which he sold for approximately $52,520.

L. Van Stillman, 54, an attorney licensed in Florida and Pennsylvania, and LMR, Ltd., an offshore company that he controlled. Stillman prepared false SEC filings on behalf of 2DoTrade, concealing Gewin, Landis, and Roelandt's beneficial ownership of 2DoTrade's stock. Stillman sold approximately 192,000 2DoTrade shares, mostly through an LMR, Ltd. brokerage account in Bermuda, realizing approximately $95,370 in ill-gotten trading profits.

Several of the 2DoTrade defendants have prior disciplinary histories. In 1992, Taylor was convicted in the United Kingdom of conspiracy to commit theft. Roelandt was enjoined in August 2000 by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Arizona for securities fraud in an action bought by the SEC, and in 2001, in another unrelated SEC action, he received an administrative penny-stock bar from the SEC. In 1999, the NASD suspended Landis' brokerage license for one year and fined him for market manipulation. And in 1998, Wood was the subject of an SEC cease-and-desist order for violations of the anti-touting provisions of the federal securities laws.

The Commission's complaint alleges that defendant 2DoTrade violated the securities-registration, anti-fraud, and issuer-reporting provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically, sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, and 13a-13 thereunder. It alleges that defendant Taylor violated the anti-fraud provisions and aided and abetted 2DoTrade's violations of the issuer reporting provisions. It alleges that defendants Gewin, Roelandt, and Landis, and the defendant companies they controlled, violated the securities-registration and anti-fraud provisions and also the beneficial-ownership and principal-shareholder reporting provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically, sections 13(d) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1, 16a-2, and 16a-3 thereunder. And it alleges that defendants, Karsch, Stillman, Wood, and Walker, and the defendant companies under their control, violated the securities-registration and anti-fraud provisions and that Stillman also aided and abetted 2DoTrade's violations of the issuer reporting provisions of the federal securities laws.

The SEC seeks, among other relief, permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with pre-judgment interest, and civil money penalties against all the defendants; officer-and-director bars against Taylor, Gewin, Roelandt, and Wood; penny-stock bars against Taylor, Gewin, Roelandt, Wood, Walker, and Karsch; and an order enjoining Roelandt from violating section 15(b)(6)(B) of the Exchange Act, which prohibits participation in a penny-stock offering in contravention of an SEC order.

The Fraudulent "Shell Factory"

Also on September 30, 2003, the SEC filed a related lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas against Craig J. Shaber, 45, a California-licensed attorney and Stephen R. Wright, 57, an accountant, both from the San Diego, California area. According to the complaint, from 1998 to 2002, Shaber and Wright engaged in an elaborate scheme to manufacture and sell 18 public shell companies, from which they derived at least $7.5 million in ill-gotten gains. To carry out the "shell factory" scheme, Shaber and Wright installed nominee officers and directors in dormant corporations that they controlled and caused these companies to submit false registration statements and reports to the SEC and the NASD, Inc. These false documents gave the bogus companies the appearance of legitimacy and permitted their securities to be eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board.

Among other things, the false registration statements and reports contained phony business plans, misrepresented the identity of the companies' true officers and directors, and contained false shareholder lists. In reality, Shaber and Wright owned virtually all of the companies' stock, and the individual shareholders listed in the documents were merely nominees for Shaber and Wright. In addition, Shaber and Wright served as the de facto officers and directors of the companies and intended not to pursue the stated business plans, but rather, to sell their controlling blocks of shares-and thus control of the shell companies-to stock promoters and other buyers for substantial profits. Shaber and Wright sold one of these fraudulently manufactured companies, Moranzo, Inc., for approximately $600,000 to certain 2DoTrade defendants, who then used it to create 2DoTrade and carry out that scheme.

The other defendant and relief defendants in the Shaber and Wright case are:

Bonaventure Capital, Ltd., defendant, a private Nevada corporation controlled by Shaber and Wright. Through Bonaventure Capital, Shaber and Wright maintained a bank account into which they deposited the funds from the sale of the stock in the public shell companies and maintained a brokerage account through which they sold securities in the public shell entities. Shaber and Wright, and entities they individually controlled, shared in the ill-gotten proceeds from the Bonaventure Capital accounts.

Wright & Geis, Inc., relief defendant, is a California corporation solely owned by Wright. It received at least $100,000 from a Bonaventure Capital bank account as proceeds from the scheme.

Aspen International Marketing, Inc., relief defendant, is a Nevada corporation owned by Shaber. It received at least $1 million in proceeds from the fraudulent scheme.

The complaint alleges that Shaber, Wright, and Bonaventure Capital violated the securities-registration, anti-fraud, beneficial-ownership, and principal-shareholder reporting provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically, sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and sections 10(b), 13(d), and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 13d-1, 16a-2, and 16a-3 thereunder. It further alleges that they aided and abetted violations of the issuer-reporting provisions, specifically, sections 13(a) of Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder. The SEC seeks disgorgement with prejudgment interest from each defendant and relief defendant and further seeks permanent injunctions, an accounting, and officer-and-director bars against defendants Shaber and Wright.

The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, the British Columbia Securities Commission, the Police Department of Tayside, Scotland, the London Metropolitan Police Department, the Hampshire Constabulary in England, the FBI's Dallas Field Office, and the United States Department of Justice in the investigation of this matter.

SEC Complaint in this matter

sec.gov 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 10/01/2003



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/1/2003 4:44:42 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
"His attorney, Irving Einhorn, didn't immediately return phone calls seeking comment."


L.A. money manager arrested, charged with fraud

JUDITH BURNS, Dow Jones Newswires Wednesday, October 1, 2003

(10-01) 08:05 PDT (AP) --

WASHINGTON (Dow Jones/AP) -- Federal agents arrested a West Hollywood, Calif., money manager and charged him with defrauding customers by reserving nearly $7.5 million of profitable trades for himself.

Paul Joseph Sheehan "cherry-picked" winning trades at the expense of his clients, prosecutors alleged Tuesday. His firm, Paul J. Sheehan & Associates, closed earlier this year.

The identities of Sheehan's clients were not known.

Sheehan, 64, faces a maximum of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine if convicted on the single criminal fraud charge. He agreed to settle a Securities and Exchange Commission civil lawsuit without admitting or denying the allegations.

Under the settlement, Sheehan will be barred from the advisory business and pay a civil fine that has yet to be determined.

Lisa Gok, an assistant regional director in the SEC's Los Angeles office, said Sheehan waited until the market had closed to allocate daily trades, allowing him to put profitable trades in his own account and reserve the rest for his clients. The SEC claims Sheehan's scheme, which ended in September 2000, netted him about $7.4 million in trading profits.

An SEC accountant detected the alleged scheme when a routine examination turned up big gaps between profits in Sheehan's account and those of his clients. An SEC economist calculated the odds of Sheehan profiting to that degree by sheer luck were an astronomic one in ten quadrillion.

Sheehan's clients included pension plans, charities, corporations and individual investors. His attorney, Irving Einhorn, didn't immediately return phone calls seeking comment.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/2/2003 7:48:30 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
Goelo, great news for Z-8 soon. Cant wait to see you squirm once again.

Our Research is never ending.....



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/3/2003 10:01:10 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
PLAYBOY BANKER NABBED BY FEDS

By KATI CORNELL SMITH

October 3, 2003 -- A playboy banker who prides himself on his "most eligible bachelor" status may not look so good to the gals after the feds get through with him.

Daniel Rubin was one of four business executives nabbed on securities fraud charges yesterday for a pump-and-dump scheme that preyed on investors in two small companies with very little revenue and a need for cash.

Rubin, CEO of Rubin Investment Group and a television market commentator, is accused of buying discounted stock in Marx Toys & Entertainment Corp. and The Classica Group - a manufacturer of sterilization equipment - talking up the companies to inflate the price and then dumping his shares.

Arrested with Rubin were one of his employees, Andrew Saska, and the heads of the two companies - Robert Lomonaco with Marx Toys and Scott Halperin with Classica.

Rubin and Saska pulled in approximately $1 million in just two days of trading over the past month, according to court papers filed by Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas Fallati.

A look at Rubin's personal Web site, www.danrubin.com, illustrates his expensive taste.

A photograph of a smiling 30-year-old shows him posed with a shiny black Lamborghini bearing the vanity plate "PLATINUM" - a sports car that he takes on frequent spins around his new hometown of Lake Helena, Fla. The Web site also prominently advertises how his good looks have won him appearances as a "most eligible bachelor" on Fox News and National Enquirer TV.



A millionaire Princeton University graduate, Rubin tried to run for mayor of Lake Helena, but officials kicked him off the ballot last month when they discovered he had lied about being a registered voter in Florida's Volusia County, a source close to the case said.

That's nothing compared to his problems now. Rubin faces up to 25 years behind bars on security fraud charges.

He pleaded not guilty at an arraignment in Brooklyn federal court and was released on $1 million bail as two young female supporters looked on with concern.

Two informants helped the feds nab the foursome by recording Rubin and Saska as they discussed details of their exploits with Marx Toys and Classica, as well as two other unidentified companies they had hit.

On Aug. 27, Classica's stock rocketed from $.51 a share to $1.34 and back to $1, the feds said.

More recently, on Sept. 18, Max Toys' stock started at 7 cents, shot up to 15 cents and then closed at 14 cents, court papers show.




nypost.com 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/6/2003 4:35:10 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
6th Oct 2003´Pirate of Prague´ indicted for fraud in U.S.

by Nick Carey



The fortunes of controversial former Czech entrepreneur Viktor Kozeny, dubbed the "Pirate of Prague" by Fortune magazine in 1996, looked set to take a turn for the worse last week as the Manhattan, the New York City district attorney's office announced a 17-count grand jury indictment against him.
Kozeny, who now holds an Irish passport, is charged with grand larceny for allegedly defrauding clients of New York hedge-fund company Omega Advisors Inc. of $182 million (Kc 4.97 billion) in his dealings in Azerbaijan in 1998. If extradited from his home in Lyford Cay in the Bahamas and convicted, Kozeny could face up to 25 years in prison.
Kozeny was also indicted in the country of his birth in July this year for alleged fraud related to his infamous Harvard Funds. Some 240,000 former clients of Harvard are still waiting for Kc 11 billion ($403 million) promised them by Kozeny.
While his U.S. indictment was largely greeted with delight in the Czech Republic last week, Kozeny rejected the charge of fraud, saying Omega's clients got the Azeri privatization coupons they asked him to obtain for them.
Kozeny allegedly persuaded several top managers at Omega, including former U.S. Senator George Mitchell, that through buying privatization coupons they could take over Azerbaijan's state-owned oil company, Socar. Kozeny has claimed that the deal failed because of unsuccessful attempts to bribe Azeri officials. The admission has led to the indictment of one of his lawyers, Hans Bodmer, in the U.S. where bribing foreign officials is a criminal offense.
The charges levied against Kozeny by Omega's clients—including an employee retirement fund of Goldman Sachs and New York's Columbia University—are that he used the company's money to buy out his own coupon privatization vouchers and for personal expenses, such as buying furnishings for his homes in Aspen, Colo., and the Bahamas. His assets have apparently been frozen, and civil cases in Denver, London, the Bahamas and the British Virgin Islands have been put on hold pending the outcome of the U.S. criminal case against him. The Wall Street Journal on Friday quoted John Moscow of the DA's office in New York as saying Kozeny will either have to surrender or face extradition, saying that for the Irish former Czech "traveling will be difficult after this."
Kozeny was quick to pronounce his innocence on Friday in an interview with the Czech Press Agency (CTK). "It's not possible that it was fraud when the investors received what they asked for," he said. "They got the exact [privatization coupons] they asked for."
The consensus among lawyers in Prague at the end of last week was that the U.S. authorities have an infinitely greater chance of bringing Kozeny to justice than their Czech counterparts.
"The United States naturally has much greater influence over the Bahamas than the Czech Republic," said Tomas Rychly, a lawyer at Vyskocil, Krocak a Spol. "Geographically and geopolitically the Czechs don't stand much chance of getting Kozeny out of there. The Americans do."
Another lawyer, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said he was relieved the U.S. authorities were now involved because the Czech authorities had been "hopeless" in their attempts to bring Kozeny to justice.
"Czech law doesn't have provisions for charging people in foreign countries," he said. "Under existing rules the indicted party has to be handed a formal indictment in person. The Czech authorities couldn't do that and have been trying for the past two months to cut a deal with the authorities in the Bahamas."
The prospect of seeing Kozeny in court, whether on this particular charge or the Kc 11 billion fraud he is accused of here, was well-received in Prague last week.
"Thank God it's happened at last," said Adriana Krnacova, executive director of Transparency International. "It's about time one of the criminals of the 1990s received an exemplary punishment for what they did to this country."
Jan Sykora, director of brokerage company Wood & Company, said the U.S. system placed much greater emphasis on property rights. "I am hopeful that this will bring the level of justice that Kozeny deserves."



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/8/2003 2:24:50 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Third former Rhino exec pleads guilty to fraud
A third former officer of Rhino Ecosystems (Pink Sheets: RHNC) has pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, the U.S. Attorney's Office said.
10:53 AM EDT Wednesday

The government said Gordon Novak, the company's former vice president, joins other Rhino senior management officers - co-defendants Charles Cini, former Rhino president, and Mark Wiertzema former Rhino chief financial officer, who both pleaded to the same securities fraud conspiracy charge.

Rhino, a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Woodbridge, Ontario, developed and began to market a grease-trapping filtration plumbing product called "Rino System" for restaurants and food-processing businesses, the government said.

Novak faces a maximum sentence of five years in prison on the conspiracy count and fine of up to $250,000. His sentencing hearing is scheduled for Dec. 16 before U.S. District Judge Jose E. Martinez.

Like those of the other, former Rhino executives, Novak's indictment stems from the former executives' taking an undercover FBI agent up on an offer to have a fund purchase Rhino stock at inflated prices. Novak and his co-defendants, the government alleged, agreed to pay about $6 million in an undisclosed kickback to the FBI agent and others to induce the fund to buy about 650,000 shares of overpriced Rhino stock for a total of $8.6 million.

Assistant U.S. attorneys Richard Hong and Harry Schimkat are prosecuting the case.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/8/2003 4:07:20 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
SPAMMER SUED BY SEC SENTENCED TO 14 MONTHS

The Commission announced today that on October 6 K.C. Smith was
sentenced to 14 months imprisonment and three years supervised release
and was ordered to pay $75,230 in restitution. On July 2, 2003, in
factual summaries submitted to the court, Smith admitted to conducting
two fraudulent investment schemes through websites and spam email during
2002.

On May 12, 2003, the SEC charged Smith with fraudulently raising
$102,554 by falsely guaranteeing double-digit monthly returns on two
websites and in approximately nine million spam e-mail messages. Without
admitting or denying the allegations made by the Commission, Smith
consented to an order requiring him to pay $107,510 in disgorgement and
pre-judgment interest and enjoining him from violating Section 17(a) of
the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [SEC v. K.C. Smith, Civil Action No.
2:03-CV-173 (E.D. Tenn.)] (LR-18130, 18208, 18397)

The criminal case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's offices for the
Eastern District of Tennessee and the Eastern District of Virginia.
[SEC v. K.C. Smith, Civil Action No. 2:03-CV-173 (E.D. Tenn.)]; [U.S. v.
K.C. Smith, (E.D. Tenn.)] (LR-18397)



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/9/2003 10:03:37 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
GOELO, WONDER IF YOUR DEFENCE LOOKS LIKE THIS?

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
____________________________________

Gabor S. Acs
Penny King Holdings Corporation
CV-N-03-0463-ECR-VPC
Defendants.
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
COUNTER COMPLAINTS
COUNTER CLAIMS
v.

Securities and Exchange Commission

Plaintiffs.

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
COUNTER COMPLAINTS
COUNTER CLAIMS

Defendants Penny King Holdings Corporation and Gabor S. Acs (“Acs”), for its’ answer to Plaintiffs complaint alleges as follows:

Penny King Holdings Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Free and Clear Foundations of America, Inc. a Washington D.C. not for profit organization. Gabor Sandor Acs is the Senior Trustee with his principal place of residence in Reno, Nevada. Penny King Holdings Corporation is not the alter ego of Acs. Acs is not a promoter or a publicist of stocks.

Acs is an independent economic analyst and author who exercises his rights to free speech through the Bill of Rights under the United States Constitution under the First Amendment whereby Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Acs has written various articles and posted messages on public bulletin boards, which the author believed to be accurate at the time such material was published. Acs was not paid to publish such materials in advance by any party about which such materials were published. Acs has not realized any “profits” from the sales of stock related to articles published by Acs.

Plaintiff has engaged in spreading, disseminating and perpetuating false and misleading information concerning the Defendant and is using sections of the Securities Act to censor Defendant, as well as to materially damage defendant in its business dealings, writings and publishing activities in violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.

2) Plaintiff has in connection with the transactions, acts, practices, and courses of action described in this Answer, Counter Complaints and Counter Claims directly and indirectly, has made use of the means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce, of the mails, and/or of the means and instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce and seeks to unfairly and unjustly use its powers as an agency of the United States Government to destroy the reputation and business of Defendant because Plaintiff believes that Defendant is a threat to certain vested interests which are able to afford the use of this Agency of Government to suppress, harm and destroy differing opinions in the matters of economics, financial policy, and the fair and equitable allocation of wealth in America.

3) Defendant Acs, an individual, seeks to deny the Securities and Exchange Commission any permanent injunction, disgorgement of non-existent profits, including alleged prejudgment interest, third tier civil money penalties, and a penny stock bar for non-existent violations of certain Sections of the Securities Act.

4) Defendants acknowledge that venue lies in this Court pursuant to Section 22(a) of the Securities Act and Section 27 of the Exchange Act because the Defendant currently resides in this judicial district, the Defendants have hereby filed a civil counter complaint and counter claim against the Plaintiff, and Plaintiff has chosen to file its complaint in this Court.

5) Defendant for its Counter Claim and Counter Complaint alleges as follows:

a) Between May 27, 1933 and September 21, 2003, Plaintiff in press releases and messages posted on Internet websites, and through various public media and government publications, publicized the Securities Act of 1933, often referred to as the "truth in securities" law. The Securities Act of 1933 has two basic objectives: requires that investors receive financial and other significant information concerning securities being offered for public sale; and prohibits deceit, misrepresentations, and other fraud in the sale of securities. Plaintiff in carrying out the mandate of Congress under the Securities Act has on numerous occasions been negligent, careless, reckless, and selectively overzealous to a fault in executing its fiduciary duties. Plaintiff on numerous occasions has made false representations to Congress concerning its budget and has on numerous occasions made selective unfair settlements with violators of the Exchange Act to the financial and economic detriment of the investing public.

b) Plaintiff has on numerous occasions used certain knowledge and information gained through the process of investigations and the powers conferred upon them as agents of the United States of America to personally benefit from such knowledge and information either financially, or in the pursuit of power and the advancement of their personal careers at the expense of the Defendants and the American Public. Plaintiff has on numerous occasions failed to enforce the Securities Act as it relates to the naked shorting of publicly traded stocks by foreign investors and hedge funds.

c) Plaintiff has on numerous occasions violated the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act.

d) Between May 27, 1933 and September 21, 2003, press releases published by newspapers, journals, and law books, and messages posted on Internet websites, and distributed by Plaintiff contained false and misleading statements, primarily concerning material facts of cases relating to civil complaints, ongoing investigations of various public and private companies and individuals, and the fair and equitable enforcement of the Securities Act of 1933, and the Exchange Act of 1934.

e) Plaintiff knew, or was reckless in not knowing, that certain of the statements disseminated concerning such cases were false and misleading and in some instances deliberately and intentionally leaked confidential information gained through investigations to the media.

f) In several of the press releases, and on the websites the Plaintiff also failed to disclose compensation it received from certain law firms, individuals, and corporations in carrying out its fiduciary duties for and on behalf of the American investing public, and or failed to honor certain confidentiality agreements between parties which contained proprietary information.

g) Plaintiff through its actions and negligence has cost the United States economy over $5 trillion in added costs, increased real and nominal interest rates, increased usurious costs of capital to small businesses and individuals, and allowed certain international corporations and private individuals to gain realized profits of $5 trillion, by failing to enforce the mandates of the United States Congress to maintain a set standard of weights and measures, and to fairly regulate the value of our monetary system.

h) Plaintiff has manipulated the stock market by selling certain stocks, either directly, or indirectly by word of mouth, private correspondence, and or telephone conversations, shortly before or after the issuance of certain of the false and misleading releases, through the sharing of information concerning investigations amongst a network of highly organized attorneys, assistant attorneys, and law firms who maintain a veil of secrecy under the false auspices of “attorney client privilege”. Such network falls under the auspices of the Racketeering and Corrupt Organizations Act otherwise known as RICO.

i) Plaintiff has engaged in selective settlements with members of the bar when improprieties related to securities transactions conducted by such members were in question. Such settlements included lower civil and monetary penalties, lower disgorgement amounts, and burial of material information withheld from the general public and withheld from the general media in violation of the Freedom of Information Act.

j) Between May 27, 1933 and September 21, 2003, Plaintiff engaged in what is known as “selective civil litigation”, taking civil actions against certain persons, organizations, and investor groups, which actions were designed to harm, destroy, discredit, or economically disable said persons, organizations and groups under the guise and the cover of “enforcement”, which actions were based on false information, and further denied such defendants equal access to information provided by their accusers, and failed to publicly provide information under the Freedom of Information Act, and violated the Privacy Act by obtaining information which was privileged and confidential on individual U.S. Citizens and Residents without proper search warrants, in direct violation of the Fourth Amendment which states: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

k) Between May 27, 1933 and September 21, 2003, Plaintiff engaged in racial discrimination against certain economic minorities by selectively enforcing the Securities Laws, denying employment applications to certain classes of persons not of Caucasian descent, and by issuing false and misleading public statements against such persons so as to discredit them, when such persons obviously lacked a certain amount of education, and therefore, in direct contravention of the laws relating to the education of the general public regarding the securities laws under the Act, Defendants painted such persons to the media and the general public as criminals when in fact such persons were attempting to follow and abide by the rules and to increase their economic position in life.

l) Between May 27, 1933 and September 21, 2003 Plaintiff deliberately failed to accept certain filings for the sale of securities by certain companies which would have been beneficial to the economy, and instead engaged in a form of repetitive harassment, delay, and false enforcement of the Securities Laws, costing taxpayers and businesses unnecessary legal and accounting fees, and in some instances the failure and collapse of certain businesses.

m) Between May 27, 1933 and September 21, 2003 Plaintiff has failed to timely, ethically, honestly, and morally enforce the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933, The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, The Trust Indenture Act of 1939, The Investment Company Act of 1940, The Investment Advisers Act of 1940, The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act and its numerous state law counterparts because Plaintiff is or has engaged in some degree in the past in a form of racketeering known as “selective civil litigation” which is intended solely as a means of harassing certain economic groups seeking to advance beyond their current means.

n) Between May 27, 1933 and September 21, 2003 Plaintiff has been negligent and malfeasant in enforcing the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933, The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, The Trust Indenture Act of 1939, The Investment Company Act of 1940, The Investment Advisers Act of 1940, The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act and its numerous state law counterparts, which negligence and malfeasance has caused severe and irreparable emotional, economic, and spiritual damage, and in some instances driven certain members of the American investing and working public to physical violence, suicide, unemployment, drug addiction, and dependence on State and Federal assistance programs designed to keep certain members of the public ignorant, underprivileged, and not privy to the secrets of the group within Plaintiff organizations’ and their corrupt secret practices.

o) Between May 27, 1933 and September 21, 2003 Plaintiff has engaged in unfair and deceptive acts and practices which shall be brought to light in the course of further investigation, subpoena of records, and information to be brought before the Court and a Jury Trial through the process of discovery and by the exercise of Defendant’s rights under the Seventh Amendment which states: In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

6. Gabor S. Acs is a Hungarian born Canadian citizen currently residing in Reno, Nevada. Mr. Acs has, through Penny King Holdings, acquired certain equity interests in various public and private companies, and will demonstrate in Court, provided a Jury Trial is granted, that he is in fact a trillionaire under generally accepted accounting principals currently used by the Securities and Exchange Commission and other publicly held companies, and that all allegations made by the Securities and Exchange Commission are false and misleading and have damaged the business interests of Mr. Acs, and further that the investigations into Mr. Acs have caused severe and irreparable loss to Defendants and their business interests. Mr. Acs will prove to the Jury in the Trial that he never claimed at any time to operate any offshore bank in any jurisdiction and such claims made by the Plaintiff are materially false, publicly damaging and further were made intentionally to harm or destroy Defendant and its public reputation.

7. Penny King Holdings is a Delaware Corporation, wholly owned by the Free and Clear Foundations of America, Inc., a not for profit organization, and holds the investments made by the Foundations for the public benefit programs managed by it. Penny King Holdings Corporation is not subject to the rules and regulations of the Investment Holding Company Act, and will prove in a Jury Trial, under current generally accepted accounting principles that it holds over $400 trillion in assets.

8. EKnowledge Group, Inc. does not trade in the .40 ranges. In fact, eKnowledge trades below .10 after a 100 for 1 reverse split and Plaintiff caused the resignation of Mr. Gary Saunders, who resigned his position as Chairman of the Board and CEO and all other positions within the Company on June 30, 2003, through false and misleading questions and allegations which Mr. Saunders could not afford to defend, resulting in a form of extortion conducted by Plaintiff.

9. Plaintiff caused Quintek Technologies, Inc. stock to plummet from .45 to less than .10 as a result of information leaks to certain individuals within three days of launching its investigation, and further caused the resignation of Mr. Tom Sims, who resigned his position as Chairman of the Board and CEO through false and misleading questions and allegations which Mr. Sims could not afford to defend, resulting in a form of extortion conducted by Plaintiff. Further, Quintek could not provide information required to complete the financing proposed with potential foreign buyers of its products due to the fact that SEC lawyers hampered then President and CEO, Chairman Tom Sims from conducting its business affairs in the normal course of business due to hundreds of harassing and intimidating phone calls, requests for documents and mountains of additional paperwork stemming from the SEC investigation.

10. Had plaintiff not interfered in the business operations of Quintek, financing as announced in the press release could have been completed and Defendant not lost $5 million through Plaintiff’s erroneous, negligent and malfeasant actions.

11. Plaintiff has relied on false information provided to it by a former SEC convicted felon, and a barred Securities attorney in New York, in making its determinations to investigate Defendant and Quintek Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff further relied on information provided by hired “plants” and “spies” who provided hearsay evidence and who monitor bulletin boards on the internet in direct violation of the Privacy Act and Domestic Intelligence Gathering Laws.

12. The Free and Clear Foundations of America, Inc., (FCFA) is managed by Gabor Sandor Acs, as Senior Trustee for the public benefit and will prove in Jury Trial that it has been buying pennies from homeless people for a nickel each, and has been acting in an economic educational capacity for the public good, encouraging saving, and has published accurate and timely information related to the corruption of the global financial markets by vested interests, including the Plaintiff. Mr. Acs does not own the Free and Clear Foundations, but manages it for the benefit of the greatest possible good for the greatest possible number. FCFA owns 100% of the stock of Penny King Holdings Corporation. Under generally accepted accounting principles, Penny King Holdings Corporation owns or controls over $400 trillion in assets, which shall be proven in a Jury Trial.

13. At all material times, the Plaintiff was in a fiduciary relationship with Defendant and owed fiduciary duties and obligations to Defendant and its constituents, including the following:

a) To at all times act honestly with loyalty and utmost good faith;
b) To at all times act in the best interests of Defendant and to place the interests of Defendant ahead of their own self-interest and that of others;
c) To refrain from acting against the best interests of Defendant and, in particular, from being in a position of conflict of interest;
d) To diligently and properly perform their obligations in their capacity as an agent of the United States of America and to protect the public interest;
e) To keep technology, business plans and other business information gathered as part of ongoing investigations of Defendant confidential;
f) To refrain from using for its own benefit or for the benefit of others the technology and business information of Plaintiffs;
g) To refrain from interfering with or conspiring against the best interests of Defendant and its constituents; and
h) To devote the necessary time, attention and skill in the best interest of Defendant’s rights in the carrying out of its fiduciary public duties.

14. Defendant will prove in a Jury Trial that it had the ability to provide the financing stated in the press releases, however, that Defendant was hindered by Plaintiff in completing said financing through a campaign of false and malicious harassment and emotional damage caused by threatening and coercive tactics employed by Plaintiff in carrying out its “enforcement” actions, and that such actions were not limited to Defendant, but to others as well.

15. Defendant will prove in a Jury Trial that statements made in all press releases were accurate to the best of the Defendant’s knowledge at the time such press releases were made and that when changes occurred as to the accuracy of such statements every effort was made by Defendant to cause the companies issuing such statements to be correct in the future going forward. Defendant shall prove in Jury Trial that the Securities and Exchange Commission cannot allege or prove any intentional fraud in this case, and that in fact the SEC has committed fraud on the general investing public through its own negligence and malfeasance.

16. Defendant will prove in a Jury Trial that the press release issued on May 14th 2002, by Penny King Holdings was accurate at the time and that including contact information for the companies involved did not imply that the companies which were mentioned endorsed a merger, but that both heads of companies had verbally discussed such a prospect, but instead chose to establish an alternative business relationship after the press release was issued, contrary to the understanding of Defendant. Defendant will prove in a jury trial that Plaintiff used coercive and harassment tactics in order to obtain testimony under oath, which was false and used in the settlement of certain cases, related to this case and made public after the fact. Defendant will prove in Court that witnesses who were deposed perjured themselves while under oath and that such perjury was caused by the Plaintiff by its own methods of questioning and obfuscation of the facts.

17. Acs did not create, and/or disseminate six releases. Acs created one release and all other releases were created, approved, reviewed, and endorsed at the time by the companies involved, and said companies did not pay Acs to promote their companies, but in fact certain documents presented by said companies were forged instruments after the investigation by the Plaintiff began. Penny King at all times had certain assets which could have been sold at any time and can to date still be sold, thereby making all claims of Plaintiff false and misleading, and which in fact have damaged Defendants reputation in the financial markets.

18. Acs did not know and was not reckless in not knowing that statements in certain press releases, which he did not approve or disseminate, were false and misleading.

19. Neither Quintek or Eknowledge paid Penny King or Acs for promotion or marketing of the shares of either company, but rather such expenses were paid to offset the expenses of devoting time to developing contracts and legal documents related to the business of both companies, and such payments were made with the full understanding of the principals involved in each business. Plaintiff is relying on forged and after the fact documents in making its case and such discovery shall become self evident during the Jury Trial.

20. Plaintiff has deliberately or negligently caused certain public securities filings to occur without questioning their accuracy when they knew or ought to have known that the filings did not accurately reflect the filing companies true financial information, contained misleading, missing information and false statements, and which ultimately impacted the entire United States economy. As a result, Defendant and its constituents have suffered and continue to suffer damages in relation to the impact of the negligence of Plaintiff. Defendants will continue to suffer such damages and other damages and losses arising from a failure to correct, and continued efforts to correct the improper public filings, pursuing proper legal recourse and obtaining correct and accurate information.

21. The Plaintiff breached their fiduciary duties and their obligations pursuant to the False Claims Act of 1986. Exact particulars of Plaintiffs breaches within their knowledge include:

a) Disclosing certain information gained while doing investigations and business plans and other business information to unauthorized persons who took advantage of such information and profited thereby;
b) Conspiring with others to cause harm to Defendant’s business plans and rights to certain Technology, contracts and agreements;
c) Using for their own personal benefit Defendant’s business plans, other business information and certain technology and knowledge in an attempt to pre-empt Defendant and its constituents from filing a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission;
d) Deliberately interfering with Defendants business plans;
e) Deliberately interfering with Defendants business relationships with other parties, including potential investors;
f) Deliberately providing false information to the United States Congress
regarding Plaintiff’s budgetary needs and ongoing investigations;
g) Failing to publicly disclose sources of financing and other internal, and external financial arrangements when settling cases which Plaintiff entered into settlement agreements with, as Plaintiff was obligated to do pursuant to the Laws of the Uniform Commercial Code, the Public Disclosure Act, the False Claims Act, the Truth in Lending Act, and the Freedom of Information Act;
h) Disclosing confidential information to the media and parties not authorized to receive such information, in contravention of their fiduciary duties;
i) Failing to assist Defendants and its constituents in the filing, prosecution and maintenance of orderly financial markets as mandated by Congress, some particulars of which are set forth above, in contravention of Plaintiffs fiduciary duties;
j) Failing and acting negligently in the regulation of salaries of certain executives of the New York Stock Exchange, the NASD, and other quasi regulatory, private and public bodies engaged in the sale, marketing, distribution, analysis and promotion of registered and unregistered securities in the United States and other foreign jurisdictions;
k) Failing and acting negligently in the regulation and control of money laundering by publicly traded FDIC insured banks in the United States;
l) Failing and acting negligently in the regulation and control of naked short selling of stocks and bonds by foreign corrupt organizations and governments resulting in the loss of billions of dollars to Defendant and its constituents;
m) Failing to uniformly apply the securities laws particularly the reporting requirements for such publicly traded companies as conduct a monopoly in the United States in the mortgage finance industry, and making false representations as to the financial health and welfare of said industry to Congress, failure to investigate and disclose overages and over charges to the general public, failure to enforce the securities laws against mortgage bankers and brokers who market and sell such securities to institutional and private investors, and falsely causing interest rates to be unusually and disproportionately high for all consumers through Plaintiffs own acts of negligence in that industry.

22. At all material times the Plaintiff knew or ought to have known of the corruption and fraud being engaged in and conducted by certain publicly traded corporations in America. At all material times the Plaintiff knew or ought to have known of the false information being filed by numerous publicly traded corporations. Further, Plaintiff knew or ought to have known Defendant could be prejudiced and economically harmed by Plaintiffs interference with Defendants rights to implement its business plans.

23. The Plaintiff intentionally and wrongfully, or in the alternative negligently, interfered with Defendant’s fiduciary and contractual relationship with its Stockholders. Exact particulars are within Plaintiff’s knowledge and include:

a) Inducing Congress to breach its fiduciary duties and its obligations to the general public pursuant to the United States Constitution and the laws of the United States;

b) Making misrepresentations about Defendant’s rights, financial condition, and business plans;

c) Making misrepresentations about Defendant’s knowledge and ability without seeking to clarify certain statements or obtaining a full copy of Defendants prospectus, which shall be delivered to the Jury and the Court as evidence.

24. Acs did not sell any Quintek shares for any profit of $40,168. Acs has never owned any shares of Quintek. Penny King Holdings Corporation owes $480,000 for the Quintek shares it did buy from the former owners of the stock.

25. Neither Acs and/or Penny King described any certain securities but rather described companies and their management in any publicly posted articles or news releases. At no time did Acs and/or Penny King promote, recommend, offer for sale, solicit the buying or selling of any securities in any public or private statements made or purported to be made by the Plaintiff.

26. Neither Acs and/or Penny King, directly or indirectly, received or were to receive consideration for such activities as promotion of stocks from the issuers, but rather such compensation was to offset legal, travel, and other expenses related to contract negotiations on behalf of each company. The fact of any published statement by Acs and/or Penny King was incidental to any formal agreements between the companies engaging the services of Acs and/or Penny King or its affiliates, and therefore there is no violation of any of Section 17(b) of the Securities Act or any other law, rule, or regulation under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. Acs has never been retained by any firm to conduct any business of any kind or nature. Acs is employed by the Free and Clear Foundations of America, Inc. to implement the Free and Clear America campaign.

27. By reason of the foregoing, Acs and Penny King have not in any way violated, nor do they need to be enjoined from violating any portion of the Securities Act, however, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and its employees, agents and other direct or indirect agencies, should be enjoined from continued negligence and malfeasance under the laws stated herein and heretofore.

28. Paragraphs 1 through 27 above are hereby restated, realleged, reclaimed and re-counter complained and incorporated by reference in addition to all claims, counter claims, and complaints for legal action to be filed in the United States Court of Federal Claims, if such counter claims and counter complaints are disallowed to be heard before this Court by a fair and equitable jury trial.

29. Defendants Acs and Penny King have not violated any portion of the Securities Act or the Exchange Act with scienter and by reason of the foregoing will not violate and therefore do not need to be restrained or enjoined from violating any section of the Securities and Exchange Act or the Securities Act now or in the foreseeable future.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/10/2003 10:30:59 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
CLUELESS FRANK: DIDN'T GET LEGAL 'MUMBO-JUMBO'

nypost.com 
By CHRIS NOLAN

October 10, 2003 -- Clearly, calmly, with humor and intelligence, former tech banking star Frank Quattrone took the witness stand just before lunch yesterday and began selling something he truly believes in: his innocence.
Quattrone's testimony is a risky, all-or-nothing strategy that, after about a half-day of testimony, appeared to be paying off for his defense.

Jurors leaned forward in their chairs to hear the testimony of the man who led Credit Suisse First Boston's high-voltage investment banking group through the Internet boom. He will be cross-examined today.

Quattrone denied that he intended to obstruct and interfere in a number of investigations of the firm.

When he sent the message endorsing an e-mail sent by subordinate Richard Char, did Quattrone "[think] about the SEC investigation or the grand jury investigation?" asked Quattrone attorney John Keker.

"No, I did not," Quattrone repeated.

Quattrone has been charged with obstruction in connection to an e-mail he circulated within his office in December 2000 entitled "time to clean up those files." The e-mail was sent just days before news of several investigations of CSFB became public.



Quattrone said consistently that he did not believe that any of the investigations facing the bank by securities regulators, the SEC or the grand jury had anything to do with his investment banking division.

Instead, they concerned another part of the bank, equity - or stock - sales and trading, a division for which he had no responsibility.

"I didn't understand much," Quattrone said of the message he got from former CSFB counsel David Brodsky talking about the probe by the SEC enforcement division. "It was a lot of legal mumbo-jumbo."

When Brodsky told Quattrone about the federal grand jury investigation, Quattrone said he still wasn't worried. "This was about IPO allocations," Quattrone said. "It was in a different division of the bank."

He said he was further reassured because Brodsky said the matter would soon be resolved. "Mr. Brodsky said the bank hadn't done anything wrong and he was going to explain that to the regulators."

That, said Quattrone, is why he didn't think of either matter when he got and endorsed the "clean up" e-mail from Char.

"It was about civil litigation. It didn't mean a grand jury or anything like that."

Keker led Quattrone through the hour in which he forwarded Char's e-mail to his banking group. During that time, he answered more than a dozen e-mails ranging from questions about personal investments, deals the bank was hoping to land and relationships it was trying to build.

"I was interruption-driven," Quattrone said of his day. "That was what my life was all about."

But, said Quattrone, he was worried by the tone that Char took in his first draft of the e-mail, in which he warned bankers that "administrative housekeeping" done before any lawsuits are on the horizon could become "improper destruction of evidence" once legal action began.

"I thought Mr. Char was using some inappropriate language, and e-mail is a medium that can last forever and can come back to haunt you," Quattrone said. "I guess I was right."

The courtroom - at that point standing room only, with prosecutors lined up against the rear wall - erupted in laughter.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/10/2003 3:57:59 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
GOELO, SEEMS THAT YOU HAVE DONE MUCH WORSE

Securities and Exchange Commission
Litigation Release No. 18408 / October 10, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Samuel D. Waksal and Jack Waksal, Defendants, and Patti Waksal, Relief Defendant
02-CIV-4407 (NRB)(S.D.N.Y.)
Today, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a second amended complaint, naming Jack Waksal as a defendant and Patti Waksal as a relief defendant. In its second amended complaint, the Commission charges, among other things, that in late December 2001, Sam Waksal, the then CEO of ImClone Systems, Inc. (IMCL), tipped his father, Jack Waksal, with the disappointing news about ImClone, that the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was expected to soon issue a decision rejecting for review ImClone's pending application to market its cancer treatment, Erbitux. Before this news became public, Jack Waksal sold his own ImClone stock and ImClone stock owned by Patti Waksal, who is Jack Waksal's daughter and Sam Waksal's sister. The Commission's second amended complaint alleges that both Sam Waksal and Jack Waksal violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and that Sam Waksal also violated Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 16a-3 thereunder.

Specifically, the Commission's complaint alleges as follows:

On the evening of December 26, 2001, Sam Waksal learned that on December 28, 2001, the FDA was expected to issue a Refusal to File (RTF) letter to ImClone rejecting consideration of its Biologics Licensing Application for Erbitux.

Also starting that evening, December 26, and through December 28, Sam Waksal himself tried to sell 79,797 shares of ImClone stock worth nearly $5 million. He was unable to do so only because two different broker-dealers would not execute his orders.

On the evening of December 26, Sam Waksal called Jack Waksal to alert him that ImClone would be receiving the bad news about the RTF letter.

Before the market opened the next morning, December 27, Sam Waksal called his daughter Aliza and directed her to sell all of her ImClone stock. Sam Waksal was Aliza's sole means of support and controlled her bank and brokerage accounts.

As soon as the market opened the next morning, December 27, Jack Waksal sold almost $7 million of ImClone stock. Jack Waksal continued to sell ImClone stock on December 28 and also sold ImClone stock in Patti Waksal's account. In total, Jack Waksal sold more than $8 million of ImClone stock over the next two days.

On December 28, Sam Waksal purchased 210 ImClone put option contracts through a Swiss brokerage account.

As expected, the FDA faxed ImClone the RTF letter at about 4 p.m. on December 28, 2001. At 6 p.m. that day, ImClone publicly announced the FDA decision. By the close of trading on December 31, the next trading day, ImClone's stock price had dropped 16%, from $55.25 to $46.46.

By selling before the announcement that ImClone had received an RTF letter from the FDA, Sam Waksal, Jack Waksal and Patti Waksal illegally avoided trading losses and Sam Waksal received illegal options trading profits.

Sam Waksal failed to file the required documents disclosing his purchase of ImClone put option contracts on December 28.
The Commission originally filed insider trading charges against Sam Waksal on June 12, 2002 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On March 11, 2003 the Commission filed an amended complaint against Sam Waksal charging additional insider trading and failure to publicly disclose securities transactions. At that time, without admitting or denying the related allegations, Sam Waksal consented to the entry of a partial final judgment in the Commission's action concerning his own attempted sale of ImClone stock in late December 2001, his options transactions on December 28, 2001, and the sale of ImClone stock in Aliza's brokerage account. Sam Waksal consented to: (a) permanent injunctions from future violations of 17(a) of the Securities Act and Sections 10(b) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5 and 16a-3 thereunder; (b) disgorgement of $804,367 representing (i) the losses avoided by the sales of ImClone stock in Aliza's account, plus prejudgment interest, and (ii) Sam Waksal's profits from the options transactions he engaged in on December 28, 2001, plus prejudgment interest; and (c) an officer and director bar.

In its second amended complaint the Commission seeks to resolve the remaining issues in the case, including (a) Sam Waksal's and Jack Waksal's liability for Jack Waksal's sales of ImClone stock on December 27 and 28, 2001, and (b) civil penalties concerning the totality of the Commission's allegations against Sam Waksal and Jack Waksal.

The Commission's investigation is ongoing. The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the investigation of this matter.

SEC Complaint in this matter



sec.gov 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 10/10/2003



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/15/2003 8:27:42 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
ANALYST RAYMOND L. DIRKS PAYS UP TO LIFT NASDAQ SUSPENSION FOR FAILURE TO PAY ARBITRATION AWARD

nasdr.com 

Individuals Suspended Pursuant to NASD Rule Series 9514(g) for Failure to Comply With an
Arbitration Award or a Settlement Agreement

(The date the suspension began is listed after the entry. If the suspension has been lifted, the date
follows the suspension date.)

Bendetsen, Brookes M.
Burlingame, California (August 5, 2003 – September 15, 2003)

Dirks, Raymond L.
New York, New York
(August 5, 2003 – September 3, 2003)

Tye, Walter A.
Boca Raton, Florida
(August 5, 2003)

Visconti, Joseph C.
Palm Beach, Florida
(August 5, 2003)



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/16/2003 9:19:54 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Dumb Criminals 205.180.85.40 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/16/2003 12:49:14 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
MORE BAD NEWS FOR GOELO;"Jeffrey Richardson, Sierra's President and head trader, settled charges that he participated in an unlawful distribution of unregistered shares, which generated millions of dollars for offshore entities controlled by the two individuals who owned and operated Yankee Financial's Brooklyn and Staten Island branch offices;"


FOR RELEASE:
CONTACTS: Thursday, October 16, 2003
Nancy A. Condon 202-728-8379
Michael Shokouhi 202-728-8304


NASD Charges Long Island Firm, its President, and Two Former Managers as a Result of Fraudulent "Boiler Room" Sales Practices

Eleven Others Barred in Related Conduct

Washington, DC — NASD announced today that it has filed a complaint charging Yankee Financial Group, Inc. of Melville, N.Y., its President and a former branch manager with engaging in high-pressure, boiler-room type sales practices that defrauded investors of $8 million. NASD also permanently barred 11 other individuals, who worked for Yankee Financial and two other firms, for related fraudulent conduct.

NASD charged that, in the fall of 2001, Richard F. Kresge, Yankee Financial's President and majority owner, opened offices in Brooklyn and Staten Island. Brokers in these offices used high-pressure sales tactics, including misrepresentations, baseless price predictions, and omissions of material facts, to persuade investors to purchase shares of three highly speculative Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) securities: Silver Star Foods, Inc.; Western Media Group Corp.; and Golden Chief Resources, Inc. In many instances, Yankee Financial brokers targeted sales of these stocks to the elderly and others for whom they were patently unsuitable.

NASD charged Yankee Financial and Kresge with fraudulent sales practices and unsuitable recommendations of these securities, as well as failing to supervise these branch offices and to establish any written supervisory procedures.

Gary Giordano, former Yankee Financial branch office manager, was charged with fraud for making unsuitable recommendations and for failing to supervise brokers in the Brooklyn and Staten Island offices. Charges against Joseph C. Korwasky, Yankee Financial's former compliance officer, included failing to report customer complaints to NASD as required and charges related to the firm's written supervisory procedures he agreed to produce.

NASD surveillance of the OTCBB and subsequent investigation of the market activity in the three securities identified a number of other individuals, some affiliated with Yankee Financial and others with Sierra Brokerage Services and Argus Securities, who improperly pressured customers to purchase shares or otherwise participated in this scheme. As a result of NASD's investigation, 11 individuals were permanently barred including:


Kenneth Gliwa, Yankee Financial's former Vice President, who settled charges that he failed to supervise the firm's branch offices, allowed two unregistered persons to hire brokers and operate the Brooklyn and Staten Island branch offices, failed to conduct any meaningful review of the three securities to determine whether they were suitable investments for the firm's customers, and allowed the firm to operate without any written supervisory procedures;

Jeffrey Richardson, Sierra's President and head trader, settled charges that he participated in an unlawful distribution of unregistered shares, which generated millions of dollars for offshore entities controlled by the two individuals who owned and operated Yankee Financial's Brooklyn and Staten Island branch offices;

Lawrence Dugo, a Yankee Financial broker, and Samuel Barmapov, an Argus broker, settled charges that they used fraudulent sales practices in recommending shares to investors; and

Joseph Ferragamo, one of the owners of theYankee Financial branch offices; Yankee Financial brokers David Anderson (a.k.a. Vasily Kouznetsov), Eric Cenname and Adam Klein; John Cook, Argus' former President; John Klukewycz, a former Argus branch manager; and Ilan Shteinberg, a former Argus broker were charged with failing to appear and testify in connection with NASD's investigation.
Under NASD rules, a firm or individual named in a complaint can file a response and request a hearing before an NASD disciplinary panel. Possible remedies include a fine, censure, suspension, or bar from the securities industry, disgorgement of gains associated with the violations, and payment of restitution.

Investors can obtain more information and the disciplinary record of any NASD-registered broker or brokerage firm by calling (800) 289-9999 or by sending an e-mail through NASD's Web Site at www.nasd.com.

NASD is the leading private-sector provider of financial regulatory services, dedicated to investor protection and market integrity through effective and efficient regulation and complementary compliance and technology-based services. NASD touches virtually every aspect of the securities business - from registering and educating all industry participants, to examining securities firms, enforcing both NASD rules and the federal securities laws, and administering the largest dispute resolution forum for investors and member firms. For more information, please visit our Web Site at www.nasd.com.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/16/2003 1:06:06 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
"KLEIN has worked as a broker at Yankee Financial Group, Inc., 9201 Fourth Avenue in Bayridge, Brooklyn, Valley Forge Securities, Inc., at 125 Maiden Lane in Manhattan, and other firms in New York and Florida. Last week, KLEIN was barred from the securities industry by the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) for refusing to give a sworn statement at an NASD proceeding."


DISTRICT ATTORNEY - NEW YORK COUNTY



News Release
June 26, 2003
Contact: Barbara Thompson
212.335.9400



Manhattan District Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau announced today that a stockbroker, recently barred from the securities industry, has pleaded guilty to laundering profits on stock deals through an offshore credit card account in order to evade New York City, State and federal taxes on more than $350,000. In a related case, an unlicensed Manhattan money transmitter has been indicted for illegally receiving and transferring billions of U.S. dollars in offshore transactions.

ADAM PETER KLEIN pleaded guilty today to one count of Money Laundering in the Third Degree, a class D felony, in violation of Penal Law § 470.10(3)(b)(i)(B). In his plea, KLEIN admitted that he evaded paying any taxes on approximately $350,000 that he received over a two-year period as payments on securities transactions. The payments were wired to a bank account in KLEIN's name at the Leadenhall Bank & Trust in Nassau, the Bahamas. KLEIN accessed the funds through a MasterCard credit card issued on the Leadenhall account.

In one ten-month period, from February to November 2001, KLEIN used his Leadenhall credit card to access $134,000, mostly by making cash withdrawals at ATMs in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Staten Island, Atlantic City, New Jersey and elsewhere. He also used the Leadenhall MasterCard for car rentals and other goods and services.

KLEIN paid no taxes on the money in his Bahamian account. As a result, he evaded almost $175,000 in New York City, State and federal taxes.

KLEIN has worked as a broker at Yankee Financial Group, Inc., 9201 Fourth Avenue in Bayridge, Brooklyn, Valley Forge Securities, Inc., at 125 Maiden Lane in Manhattan, and other firms in New York and Florida. Last week, KLEIN was barred from the securities industry by the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) for refusing to give a sworn statement at an NASD proceeding.

Today's action is part of a continuing investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney's Office into the use in the New York metropolitan area of credit cards issued by financial institutions located in offshore jurisdictions - such as the Bahamas and the Cayman Islands - which have strict bank and corporate secrecy laws. In 2001 alone, offshore credit cards issued by a single credit card company for 115,000 separate accounts were used in the tri-state area to access over a hundred million US dollars deposited in Leadenhall and other offshore banks. In another case under investigation, a Leadenhall account holder withdrew more than $550,000 from ATMs in New York and New Jersey in a nine-month period. Anyone with information about offshore credit card holders is urged to call the Manhattan District Attorney's Office at 212-335-9211.

In a related case, BEACON HILL SERVICE CORPORATION has been charged in a four-count indictment with operating as an unlicensed money transmitter, in violation of New York Banking Law § 650(2)(b)(1), a class E felony. BEACON HILL's activities were uncovered by investigators from the Manhattan District Attorney's Office in the course of tracing payments to credit card accounts at Leadenhall Bank & Trust.

The investigation revealed that BEACON HILL, which has been doing business at offices in Midtown since 1994, received and transmitted funds from numerous sources, including individuals, shell corporations and South American exchange houses known as "casas de cambio." The money was moved to and from Beacon by wire, check deposits, and payable through drafts. During 2001 and 2002, wire transfers in just four of Beacon Hill's 40 accounts totaled more than $3.2 billion.

Beacon Hill shut down on February 4, 2003 after investigators from the Manhattan District Attorney's Office executed a search warrant at the company's offices at 226 East 54th Street in Manhattan. The District Attorney has initiated a forfeiture action and has frozen more than $13 million of the funds left in BEACON HILL's accounts when it was closed.

The investigation into BEACON HILL is continuing.

Mr. Morgenthau said, "Offshore banks in secrecy jurisdictions and illegal money transmitters are used by those who wish to conceal the proceeds of a variety of criminal activities; increasingly, these facilities are being used to cheat the City, State and federal governments of millions in badly needed tax revenues. We in law enforcement need to use all the resources we can spare to prosecute the institutions and individuals involved and dismantle this wide-spread and growing money laundering apparatus. In a time of extraordinary demands on government, everyone needs to pay a fair share of taxes."

Mr. Morgenthau thanked the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, specifically Thomas C. Baxter, Jr., Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Jodi C. Remer, Robert G. Amenta, John Davila and Robert Guthmuller. He also thanked the New York State Banking Department and Superintendent Diana Taylor, Ralph Fatigate and Sarah Kelsey for assistance in these investigations. The District Attorney also thanked David Aufhauser, Counsel to the US Treasury Department, and the US Internal Revenue Service.

Assistant District Attorneys Marc Frazier Scholl and Rebecca Roiphe are assigned to the Beacon Hill Service Corp. prosecution. Assistant District Attorneys Rebecca Roiphe and Seth Krauss and Jonathan Washburn, Chief of the Proceeds of Crime Unit, are assigned to the investigation of off-shore credit card accounts. Assistant District Attorneys Krauss and Arthur Middlemiss are assigned to the Adam Peter Klein case, assisted by Jonathan Washburn. They were assisted by District Attorney's Office Investigations Bureau Chief Joseph Pennisi and Investigators Steve Akselrod, Luis Bauza, Andrew J.P. Finan, Thomas A. Jackson, Cassie Kim, Joyce Lam, Peter J. Mangus, Jeremy Rosenthal, and Shannon Rowe. Chief Financial Analyst Peggy Abensur also assisted in these cases. These investigations and prosecutions are being supervised by Assistant District Attorney John W. Moscow, Deputy Chief of the Investigation Division.










###



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Defendant Information

ADAM PETER KLEIN, 8/19/77
296 Brookfield Avenue
Staten Island, New York



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/16/2003 3:33:25 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
NASD charges New York firm in boiler-room fraud
Reuters, 10.16.03, 12:00 PM ET


By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The NASD on Thursday said it charged Yankee Financial Group Inc. and its president with defrauding investors, including the elderly, of $8 million by using high-pressure, "boiler-room" sales tactics to sell risky, over-the-counter stocks.

The regulator charged the Melville, New York-based broker-dealer and its 48-year-old president, Richard Kresge, who owns 95 percent of the firm, with fraudulently recommending that clients buy three "patently unsuitable" stocks from October 2001 through at least May 2002. It is seeking sanctions and full restitution, with interest.

The NASD, formerly the National Association of Securities Dealers, said it permanently barred 11 people involved in the scheme. It said much of the sales proceeds were funneled through Bahamian accounts maintained by a single broker-dealer, Sierra Brokerage Services, to "several suspicious entities."

Reached by phone, Kresge, referring to the charges, said "it's not true" and referred calls to his lawyer.

The lawyer, Paul Bazil, a partner at Pickard and Djinis LLP in Washington, said Yankee and Kresge filed an answer denying the NASD's charges. "Mr. Kresge looks forward to the hearings in this matter, at which time he is confident he will be exonerated and protect the good name he has earned over the last quarter century," Bazil said.

The NASD said brokers in Yankee's Brooklyn and Staten Island offices used misrepresentations, omissions and baseless price predictions to persuade investors to buy shares in oil and gas company Golden Chief Resources Inc., pasta distributor Silver Star Foods Inc. and Western Media Group Corp. , whose businesses include computer consulting and sporting goods stores.

"These companies had dubious business operations, virtually no assets or revenues, and few prospects," the NASD said in its complaint. Golden Chief shares no longer trade over the counter; shares in the others trade for less than $1.

The NASD also charged former Yankee branch manager Gary Giordano, 42, with fraud and failure to supervise brokers. Joseph Korwasky, 51, Yankee's former compliance officer, was charged with failure to report customer complaints.

The barred individuals worked for Yankee, Sierra or Argus Securities, which the NASD said was also involved in the scheme. They include: Kenneth Gliwa, a former Yankee vice president; Joseph Ferragamo, a Yankee branch owner; David Anderson a/k/a Vasiliy Kouznetsov, Eric Cenname, Lawrence Dugo and Adam Klein, all Yankee brokers; Jeffrey Richardson, Sierra's president; John Cook, a former Argus president; John Klukewycz, a former Argus branch manager, and Samuel Barmapov and Ilan Shteinberg, former Argus brokers.

Copyright 2003, Reuters News Service



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/16/2003 3:41:45 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
NASD Charges Long Island Firm, its President, and Two Former Managers as a Result of Fraudulent 'Boiler Room' Sales Practices
Thursday October 16, 9:40 am ET
Eleven Others Barred in Related Conduct


WASHINGTON, Oct. 16 /PRNewswire/ -- NASD announced today that it has filed a complaint charging Yankee Financial Group, Inc. of Melville, N.Y., its President and a former branch manager with engaging in high-pressure, boiler- room type sales practices that defrauded investors of $8 million. NASD also permanently barred 11 other individuals, who worked for Yankee Financial and two other firms, for related fraudulent conduct.
NASD charged that, in the fall of 2001, Richard F. Kresge, Yankee Financial's President and majority owner, opened offices in Brooklyn and Staten Island. Brokers in these offices used high-pressure sales tactics, including misrepresentations, baseless price predictions, and omissions of material facts, to persuade investors to purchase shares of three highly speculative Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) securities: Silver Star Foods, Inc.; Western Media Group Corp.; and Golden Chief Resources, Inc. In many instances, Yankee Financial brokers targeted sales of these stocks to the elderly and others for whom they were patently unsuitable.

NASD charged Yankee Financial and Kresge with fraudulent sales practices and unsuitable recommendations of these securities, as well as failing to supervise these branch offices and to establish any written supervisory procedures.

Gary Giordano, former Yankee Financial branch office manager, was charged with fraud for making unsuitable recommendations and for failing to supervise brokers in the Brooklyn and Staten Island offices. Charges against Joseph C. Korwasky, Yankee Financial's former compliance officer, included failing to report customer complaints to NASD as required and charges related to the firm's written supervisory procedures he agreed to produce.

NASD surveillance of the OTCBB and subsequent investigation of the market activity in the three securities identified a number of other individuals, some affiliated with Yankee Financial and others with Sierra Brokerage Services and Argus Securities, who improperly pressured customers to purchase shares or otherwise participated in this scheme. As a result of NASD's investigation, 11 individuals were permanently barred including:

* Kenneth Gliwa, Yankee Financial's former Vice President, who settled
charges that he failed to supervise the firm's branch offices, allowed
two unregistered persons to hire brokers and operate the Brooklyn and
Staten Island branch offices, failed to conduct any meaningful review of
the three securities to determine whether they were suitable investments
for the firm's customers, and allowed the firm to operate without any
written supervisory procedures;
* Jeffrey Richardson, Sierra's President and head trader, settled charges
that he participated in an unlawful distribution of unregistered shares,
which generated millions of dollars for offshore entities controlled by
the two individuals who owned and operated Yankee Financial's Brooklyn
and Staten Island branch offices;
* Lawrence Dugo, a Yankee Financial broker, and Samuel Barmapov, an Argus
broker, settled charges that they used fraudulent sales practices in
recommending shares to investors; and
* Joseph Ferragamo, one of the owners of the Yankee Financial branch
offices; Yankee Financial brokers David Anderson (a.k.a. Vasily
Kouznetsov), Eric Cenname and Adam Klein; John Cook, Argus' former
President; John Klukewycz, a former Argus branch manager; and Ilan
Shteinberg, a former Argus broker were charged with failing to appear
and testify in connection with NASD's investigation.


Under NASD rules, a firm or individual named in a complaint can file a response and request a hearing before an NASD disciplinary panel. Possible remedies include a fine, censure, suspension, or bar from the securities industry, disgorgement of gains associated with the violations, and payment of restitution.

Investors can obtain more information and the disciplinary record of any NASD-registered broker or brokerage firm by calling (800) 289-9999 or by sending an e-mail through NASD's Web Site at www.nasd.com.

NASD is the leading private-sector provider of financial regulatory services, dedicated to investor protection and market integrity through effective and efficient regulation and complementary compliance and technology-based services. NASD touches virtually every aspect of the securities business -- from registering and educating all industry participants, to examining securities firms, enforcing both NASD rules and the federal securities laws, and administering the largest dispute resolution forum for investors and member firms. For more information, please visit our Web Site at www.nasd.com.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: NASD



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/16/2003 3:46:00 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
* Jeffrey Richardson, Sierra's President and head trader, settled charges
that he participated in an unlawful distribution of unregistered shares,
which generated millions of dollars for offshore entities controlled by
the two individuals who owned and operated Yankee Financial's Brooklyn
and Staten Island branch offices;



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/16/2003 3:48:38 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
5. Sierra Brokerage Services, Inc. ("Sierra"), its president, Jeffrey Richardson ("Richardson") and its trader, Richard Geiger ("Geiger") (collectively, the "Broker-dealer

Defendants") participated in the scheme to manipulate the price of BluePoint shares.

6. At all relevant times, Markow, Goelo, Yang and Luo (collectively, the "Promoter Defendants") acted as a group and controlled a vast majority of the free-trading shares, or float, of BluePoint in order to manipulate the price of BluePoint shares. When BluePoint stock began trading publicly on March 6, 2000, the Broker-dealer Defendants facilitated the scheme by creating artificial trading activity in BluePoint stock that enabled the Promoter Defendants to complete the scheme. The Promoter Defendants and Broker-dealer Defendants engaged in trading of BluePoint shares at artificially high prices that were hundreds of times more than what the Promoter Defendants had paid for less than three weeks earlier.

7. Tsai made false filings with the Commission when he failed to disclose his true ownership of the shares and the subsequent sale of those shares to the Promoter Defendants. Although the Promoter Defendants had collectively acquired nearly 20% of BluePoint's 20 million outstanding shares and over 90% of the publicly traded shares, they never reported their ownership to the Commission in any filing as required under the federal securities laws.

8. On March 6, 2000 and after, Jerome Armstrong ("Armstrong") promoted BluePoint on the Raging Bull internet site, which carried hundreds of posts about BluePoint. Armstrong received undisclosed compensation from Markow and Goelo in return for his posts.

9. In the weeks and months after BluePoint started trading, BluePoint's price and volume steadily declined from its all-time high of $21. Nonetheless, the Promoter Defendants continued to sell at a profit, having paid Tsai only pennies for their shares. The Promoter Defendants never reported any changes in ownership when they sold their BluePoint shares in any filings with the Commission.

10. Tsai, directly and indirectly, has engaged and, unless enjoined, will continue to engage in acts, practices and courses of business which constitute violations of the registration provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically, Section 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") [15 U.S.C. §§77e(a) and 77e(c)] and Sections 13(d)(1) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §§78m(d)(1) and 78p(a)] and Rules 13d-1(a) and 16a-3 [17 C.F.R. §240.16a-3] thereunder.

11. Markow, directly and indirectly, has engaged and, unless enjoined, will continue to engage in acts, practices and courses of business which constitute violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §77q(a)], Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. §78j(b)], and Rule 10b-5 [17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5] thereunder; or in the alternative, Markow has engaged and, unless enjoined, will continue to engage in acts, practices and courses of business which constitute aiding and abetting the other promoter's violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §77q(a)], Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. §78j(b)], and Rule 10b-5 [17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5] thereunder.

12. Goelo, Yang, Luo, and the Broker-dealer Defendants, directly and indirectly, have engaged and, unless enjoined, will continue to engage in acts, practices and courses of business which constitute violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §77q(a)], Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. §78j(b)], and Rule 10b-5 [17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5] thereunder.

13. The Promoter Defendants, directly and indirectly, have engaged and, unless enjoined, will continue to engage in acts, practices and courses of business which constitute violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically, Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §77q(a)], and Sections 13(d)(1), 13(d)(2), and 16(a) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §§78j(b), 78m(d)(1), 78m(d)(2) and 78p(a)] and Rules 13d-1(a), 13d-2(a), and 16a-3 [17 C.F.R. §§240.10b-5, 240.13d-1(a), 240.13d-2(a), and 240.16a-3] thereunder.

14. Sierra, directly and indirectly, has engaged and, unless enjoined, will continue to engage in acts, practices and courses of business which constitute violations of the broker-dealer anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically Section 15(c)(1) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §78o(c)(1)]. Geiger and Richardson, directly and indirectly, have engaged and, unless enjoined, will continue to engage in acts, practices and courses of business which constitute aiding and abetting violations of the broker-dealer anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically, Section 15(c)(1) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §78o(c)(1)].

15. Armstrong, directly and indirectly, has engaged and, unless enjoined, will continue to engage in acts, practices and courses of business which constitute violations of the touting provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically, Section 17(b) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §77q(b)].



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/16/2003 3:51:13 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
BTW, GOELO, THIS IS NOT THE NEWS I WAS TALKING ABOUT THAT IS COMING YOUR WAY.

FUTURE NEWS RELATED TO YOU WILL BE THE FINAL VINDICATION FOR THE Z-8

THE RESEARCH IS ON GOING TILL THE TIME YOU ARE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/16/2003 7:21:24 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
Dude, you're getting an SEC probe!
By John Paczkowski
Posted on Thu, Oct. 16, 2003

Well, that didn't take long. An e-mail exchange between Frank Quattrone and Dell Computer Chairman Michael Dell introduced into evidence earlier this week in the trial of the former CSFB investment banker has sparked a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation. According to a person familiar with the situation, the SEC is looking into whether Quattrone improperly doled out pre-IPO shares of Corvis to Dell in hopes of winning his company's business. At first glance, the exchange in question seems to suggest that Quattrone is guilty of just that. "My team has gotten word to me that you are personally interested in having Dell Ventures receive a meaningful allocation of the IPO of Corvis," Quattrone wrote to Dell in July 2000. Dell replied: "We would like 250k shares of Corvis. I know there have been efforts on both sides to build the relationship and an offering like this would certainly help." The problem for the SEC officers investigating this quid pro quo, is that it didn't help. Dell did receive 150,000 Corvis shares, but it never hired CSFB for any investment-banking business.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/18/2003 11:57:51 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Fraud victims want justice
10/17/2003 5:25 PM
By: Debbie Tanna & Web Staff


Anthony Allen is in the Cumberland County Jail under a $1 million bond.

Hundreds of Fayetteville residents had their worst fears confirmed on Friday. They've lost their life savings.

Clients who invested their money with Fayetteville businessman Anthony Allen met with investigators to learn the fate of their retirement savings.

Allen, owner of Client Relations, an estate planning firm, was arrested this week and charged with embezzling millions of dollars from his clients.

His possible victims said they have nothing to lose in their pursuit of justice.

“I'm not at all optimistic that there's a pile of money somewhere,” said District Attorney Ed Grannis.

It wasn't what people came to hear. They’d hoped their life savings would be stashed safely away.

“It was my retirement,” said victim David Parnell. [Now I’m going to] go hungry. I can't go back to work. I’ve had three total knee replacements and three total hip replacements.”

Parnell is one of the hundreds who say Allen defrauded them of their investments.

“I was shocked,” said victim Margie Stephenson. “I was actually in shock the first four days and I realized there's a lot of people just like me.”

Stephenson tried for months to get a portion of her money back from Allen to make home repairs. All she ever received were a lot excuses and reasons why she should wait.

“These are good, honest, hard working people who weren't themselves involved in some scheme trying to get rich quick but instead who were people who were promised that what they worked for would be safe, would be taken care of and would be there for them,” victims’ attorney Ronnie Mitchell said.

Investigators say Allen lived a lavish lifestyle off of money clients trusted him to safeguard. Hurt and anger only begin to describe what they feel today.

“Absolutely and they should be,” said victims’ attorney Coy Brewer. “This is a tragic situation, an unmitigated tragic situation.”

Grannis says that a task force is being formed this week made up of local, state and federal law enforcement agencies. These men and women will see to it that justice is served.

“If he did what it looks like he's done, I'd like to see him hand under the Market House by his feet,” Parnell said.

Allen remains in the Cumberland County Jail under a $1 million bond.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/20/2003 3:58:09 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Investors sue Bahamian companies for fraud recovery
CATHERINE WILSON
Associated Press
Posted on Mon, Oct. 20, 2003

MIAMI - A 10-time world bridge champion is among investors suing two Bahamian banking companies, claiming they were conduits in an auto-title pawn fraud that fleeced people out of $158 million.

Leadenhall Bank & Trust, a Bahamian private bank, and its credit card affiliate, Axxess International Ltd., were sued in federal court last week by about 2,000 people who loaned money for Cash 4 Titles operations.

Cash 4 Titles was shut down in 1999 when securities investigators said the Atlanta-based company was running a Ponzi scheme that paid a promised tax-free return of up to 36 percent to old investors with money from new ones.

William Jennings, a director of Leadenhall, said Monday that he was unaware of the lawsuit and had no comment on it. A phone number for Axxess reached a recording saying it was not in service.

Cash 4 Titles operated 36 stores offering short-term, high-interest loans to borrowers who pledged their auto titles as collateral, but the lawsuit said it was taking in more money from investors than it needed for operations and diverting it.

Owner Charles Homa and chief fund-raiser Michael Gause were sent to prison after Homa turned on his former partner and went to federal investigators in New York, the lawsuit said.

While denying any wrongdoing, the Bank of Bermuda has paid about $50 million to settle claims that its Cayman Islands branch supported the fraud. A court-appointed receiver has recovered another $30 million.

"The investors have not yet been paid 100 percent of their losses," one of their attorneys, Lawrence Kellogg, said Monday.

Leadenhall and Axxess promoted Cash 4 Titles and their own banking services, including account offerings and credit cards, while hosting investors on their trips to the Bahamas, the lawsuit said. Cash 4 Titles investors accounted for 80 percent of Axxess' business.

James Owen, a Leadenhall officer, was part of investor recruitment seminars and traveled to North Carolina as part of the fraud, the suit said.

Leadenhall and Axxess vouched for Cash 4 Titles, helped provide an air of legitimacy and were "critical in sustaining and attracting necessary additional cash flow to ensure that the prior investors would continue to receive some 'return' on the investment," the suit said.

Millions in Cash 4 Titles money was moving through Leadenhall and Axxess on a daily basis just before its collapse, the suit said.

The racketeering suit seeking class-action status for investors is the latest in a series of lawsuits, prosecutions and enforcement actions involving Cash 4 Titles.

Investors included Jacksonville Jaguars running back Fred Taylor and former college football coaches Jim Carlen, Brad Scott and Danny Ford, who were brought in by sports agent William "Tank" Black.

The lead plaintiff, bridge champion Robert Wolff of Fort Worth, Texas, said he invested $125,000 as a nine-month loan and received none of the promised profits.

Individual investments ranged from $5,000 to $22 million, with the average around $100,000. Large clusters of investors were in Atlanta, Florida, Illinois, Maryland and South Carolina.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/20/2003 8:24:07 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Four arrested in $4 million check fraud bust
Monday, October 20, 2003

This man may look familiar. That's because he is David Stark, the owner of two car dealerships here in the valley. Tonight, he is behind bars, his dealerships closed down. Stark and 3 others are charged with the largest bank fraud in the county's history.

The police have temporarily shut down the Mazda/Kia Superstore here in La Quinta, and the Kia Superstore in Cathedral City, after arresting the owner, Dave Stark early this morning. Stark is accused of running an unprecedented check-kiting scheme that cost one local bank nearly 4 million dollars.

Police and Secret Service swarmed the Mazda/Kia Superstore after making what they called one of the largest check fraud busts the Secret Service has ever seen.

The owner of the car dealerships in La Quinta and Cathedral City, Dave Stark, is charged with 16 felony counts of bank fraud.Also charged, his brother, Kia Superstore Manager Jeffrey Stark, accountant Elaine Kontra, and Dawn Barr, a former employee at FirstBank in Palm Desert. Investigators say the four were involved in a huge bank-kiting scheme.

Here's how investigators say Stark's plan worked:

He had 3 banks, Banks A, B, and C. He would write a check from bank A to bank B, but there wouldn't be enough money in bank a to cover it, so he'd write a check from back c to make up the difference, and then write a check from back A to C and on and on and on for three years.

When Stark stopped writing checks, one bank was left with no money in their cup. In this case, investigators say that bank was FirstBank in Palm Desert.

“We have a loss of $3.8 million. There were approximately 30,000 checks written.”

Police say the checks, worth hundreds of millions of dollars, were written to and from the bank accounts for the Mazda/Kia Superstore and Jeffrey Stark. FirstBank says they noticed the nearly 4 million dollar loss last February, and notified police.

The other two banks in the alleged check-kiting scheme, Guaranty and Provident, apparently did not lose any money.

6 law enforcement agencies from local to federal were in on the bust. All four defendants could face dozens of years behind bars, and millions of dollars worth in fines.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/21/2003 8:46:18 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
More "Evil" to be uncovered in Francois Goelo fraud scandal.

Stay Tuned!!

Like you have a choice.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/22/2003 1:50:40 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
VERY NICE, THEY ARE KEEPING STATS ON YOU GOELO sec.gov 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/22/2003 2:25:01 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
GOELO, DO YOU REMEMBER YOUR POSTS ON SI ABOUT "Charles T. Tamburello"?

LIKE MOST THAT HAVE BEEN INVOLVED WITH YOU IN THE END THE TRUTH PREVAILED.

======================
Alleged 'Scalper' Picks Up Four New Microcap Clients

MONDAY , OCTOBER 20, 2003 01:45 AM

Oct 20, 2003 (financialwire.net via COMTEX) -- (FinancialWire) Despite civil charges filed on August 13 against Capital Research Group, Inc., operator of TheSUBWAY.com website, and its owner, Charles T. Tamburello, for "scalping," the practice of "recommending the purchase of a stock to the general public while selling the stock at or near the same time," by the U.S. Securites and Exchange Commission, it continues to be "business" as usual for the firm, its alleged owner and website.

Viper Networks Inc. (OTC: VPER), Celerity Systems Inc. (OTCBB: CESY), and Senticore Inc. (OTCBB: SNTR) have joined Telecom Communications Inc. (OTCBB: TCOM) on either CRG's "Stock Watch List" or its "Stock Focus List."

These companies are touted in press releases that utilize a blatant form of ticker spam, providing "research" ratings for large cap companies intermingled with promotional phrases for the microcaps. The idea is that traders looking at "research" about the larger companies will notice the microcaps and perhaps open a trade for one or more of them. Neither CRG nor TheSUBWAY.com, however, provide any information about the qualifications of its "researchers."

The SEC alleged that CRG, TheSUBWAY.com and Tamburello are among five Florida stock promoters that "used the Internet, press releases, spam e-mails, and televised interviews to commit securities fraud through baseless financial projections" and the subsequent scalping.

"We expect great things from this stock! Watch this company; it just announced great news, and we think it is due to make a move in the near term!," CRG effused about Viper. According to CRG's disclosures, "CRG has been compensated 100,000 shares for Viper," worth $13,500 as of Friday's close.

Further, the firm admits "CRG intends to sell its shares. CRG has sold approximately zero shares to date. CRG may sell its shares for less than the target price given in this opinion. CRG's affiliates, officers, directors and employees may also have bought or may buy the shares discussed in this opinion and may profit in the event those shares rise in value. CRG will not advise as to when it decides to sell and does not and will not offer any opinion as to when others should sell; each investor must make that decision based on his or her judgment of the market."

SEC regulators have told FinancialWire that it is not sufficient to list compensation, as CRG has done for Viper, but that the disclosure must include the source of the compensation. If such compensation is from a third party, the SEC has told FinancialWire that the source must be named as well as the relationship of the payer to the issuer. Otherwise, said the regulators, it is a violation of Section 17(b).

CRG did not disclose the source of the compensation in its release, and it is not clear if the disclosures of selling in such close proximity to touts, even if and when disclosed, is similar to the allegations the SEC has made about the company only two months ago in a press release at sec.gov  and in the underlying complaint located at sec.gov 

As to Celerity, CRG noted that "We expect great things from this stock! Watch this company; we think it is due to make a move in the near term!," in a now familiar mantra. The excitement was generated to shareholders and investors in a list of tickers, including Gemstar-TV Guide International (NASDAQ: GMST), which its "research" noted is now "Market Underperform."

The press release did not provide the qualifications of any analysts involved in the ratings, nor if the analyst(s) are members and subscribe to the ethics and standards of the Association for Investment Management and Research. The failure to provide these disclosures is also a violation of the "Standards for Independent Research Providers" promulgated by the FIRST Research Consortium.

CRG disclosed that it had received $6,000 for Celerity, but did not disclose the source. It stated it "intends to sell its shares," but did not disclose how many, if any shares it received.

As to Senticore Inc., CRG said, yes, you guessed: "We expect great things from this stock!," adding, "Watch this stock...it could be a huge gainer in near-term trading as market participants take notice!"

A "Peter Antipatis of Capital Research Group Inc.", also noted in the same release that E- LOAN Inc. (NASDAQ: EELN) is now "Market Perform," although Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) was listed as "Market Underperform." A FinancialWire reporter could not find a biography for Antipatis, nor a description of his analyst qualifications.

CRG disclosed it has received 200,000 shares of Senitor, valued at market close Friday at $184,000! CRG further disclosed it had so far sold approximately 50,000 shares but going forward "will not advise as to when it decides to sell." Presumably that will not be in close proximity to its touts, although the SEC's charges of "scalping" did not seem to dissuade the company last week when it disclosed ownership of 50,000 less shares of LocatePLUS (OTCBB: LPLHA) within five days of a tout.

As to Telecom Communications, TheSUBWAY.com, adding it to its "Stock Focus List," noted that, we, uh, "expect great things from this stock! Watch this company; it just announced great news, and we think it is due to make a move in the near term!" At the same time, Geron Corp. (NASDAQ: GERN) was moved by the firm to "Market Underperform." TheSUBWAY.com says it "ranks stocks from time to time utilizing both fundamental and technical analysis in comparison to the S&P 500 over the short term. These ratings reflect the opinion of Capital Research Group, Inc."

CRG said it has been compensated 100,000 shares of TCOM, but despite expecting "great things" and believing it is "due to make a move in the near term," CRG said it had cashed out. If the company had sold at Friday's closing, it would have received $113,000!

CRG discloses that it is " not a licensed broker, broker dealer, market maker, investment banker, investment advisor, analyst or underwriter," but fails to disclose that it is not a professional research organization, as its name implies, and does not provide any credentials for its "writers" or "analysts" as required by the Standards and the Association for Investment Management and Research.

CRG has disclosed a wide range of compensation by "one or more third parties on behalf of" some 38 public companies, but it does not disclose either the source or the relationship of the source to the issuer.

The company's compensation disclosures on its website as of Sunday, October 18.

12 to 20 Plus, Inc. (OTC: TTTP) -- CRG has been compensated three hundred thousand shares, CRG has sold approx zero shares.

Aussie Apparel Group Ltd. (OTCBB: AASI) -- CRG has been compensated one million shares, CRG has sold approx zero shares.

Amnis Systems Inc. (OTCBB: AMNM) -- CRG has been paid six thousand US dollars, CRG could recieve up to eighteen thousand US dollars.

Adirondack Pure Springs Mt Water Co Inc (OTCBB: APSW) -- CRG has been compensated one hundred thousand shares, CRG has sold approx one hundred thosuand shares.

Alternate Energy Corporation (OTCBB: ARGY) -- CRG has been compensated two hundred thousand shares, CRG has sold approx one hundred twenty five thousand shares.

Central Wireless, Inc. (OTCBB: CWIR) -- CRG has been compensated seven million shares, CRG has sold approx seven million shares.

CirTran Corp (OTCBB: CIRT) -- CRG has not been compensated, but is expecting one million shares.

Cyberkey Corp -- CRG has been compensated one hundred and fifty thousand shares, CRG has sold zero shares.

Elinear, Inc. (OTCBB: ELIN) -- CRG has been compensated forty thousand USD, in addition to sixty thousand restricted shares.

Elite Flight Solutions (OTCBB: EFLT) -- CRG has recieved one million six hundred thousand shares, CRG has sold approx one million four hundred thousand shares.

Fieldpoint Petroleum (OTCBB: FPPC) -- CRG has been paid twelve thousand USD.

Family Room Entertainment Corp (OTCBB: FMLY) -- CRG has been compensated two hundred thousand shares, CRG has sold approx one hundred thousand shares.

Genesis Technology Group, Inc. (OTCBB: GTEC) -- CRG has been compensated one million shares, CRG has sold approx zero shares.

GiveMePower Corp. (OTCBB: GMPW) -- CRG has been compensated seventy five thousand shares, CRG has sold approx twenty five thousand shares. CRG can receive up to two hundred thousand shares.

Global Business Markets, Inc. (OTCBB: GBMI) -- CRG has been compensated two million shares, CRG has sold approx zero shares.

Global Energy Group, Inc. (OTCBB: GENG) -- CRG has been compensated one hundred thousand shares, CRG has sold approx fifty thousand shares.

Group Management Corp -- CRG has been compensated five million shares. CRG has sold approx three million shares.

Health Express USA, Inc. (OTCBB: HEXS) -- CRG has been compensated one hundred and fifty thousand shares, CRG has sold approx one hundred twenty five thousand thousand shares. CRG has been compensated two hundred and fifty thousand restricted shares.

Hard to Treat Diseases Inc (OTC: HTDS) -- CRG has been compensated two million shares, CRG has sold approx five hundred thousand shares.

Integrated Performance Systems, Inc. (OTCBB: IPFS) -- CRG has been paid twenty thousand shares, CRG has sold approx two thousand shares.

Linux Gold Corporation (OTCBB: LNXGF) -- CRG has been compensated five hundred thousand shares, CRG has sold approx one hundred fifty thousand shares.

LocatePlus Holdongs, Corp. (OTCBB: LPLHA) -- CRG has been compensated nine hundred fifteen thousand nine hundred seventy two shares and forty two thousand five hundred dollars. CRG can receive up to two million two hundred thousand shares. CRG has sold approx three hundred thousand shares.

Magnum d'Or Resources (OTCBB:MAGR) -- CRG has been compensated one million shares, CRG has sold approx three hundred thousand shares.

Medical Staffing Solutions (OTCBB: MSSI) -- CRG has been compensated sixty thousand shares, CRG has sold aprox zero shares. CRG can recieve up to one hundred thousand shares.

North Star Diamonds Inc. (OTC: NSDM) -- CRG has been compensated two hundred and fifty thousand shares. CRG can recieve up to one million shares. CRG has sold approx zero shares.

Nova Communications Ltd. (OTCBB: NCVM) -- CRG has been compensated two million five hundred thousand shares, CRG has sold approx seven hundred fifty thousand shares.

Nettel Holding -- CRG has been compensated twenty thousand shares, CRG has sold approx ten thousand shares.

Paradise Tan, Inc. (OTC: PTNK) -- CRG has been compensated one million shares, CRG has sold approx zero shares.

QI Systems, Inc. -- CRG has been compensated one hundred and twenty five thousand shares, CRG has sold approx fifteen thousand shares.

R Wireless. Inc. (OTCBB: RWLS) -- CRG has been compensated fifty thousand USD, in addition to two hundred thousand restricted shares.

Reclamation Consulting and Applications, Inc. (OTCBB: RCAA) -- CRG has been compensated one hundred fifty thousand shares, CRG has sold approx eighty thousand shares.

Senticore, Inc.(OTCBB: SNTR) -- CRG has been compensated two hundred thousand shares, CRG has sold approx fifty thousand shares.

Telecom Communications, Inc. (OTCBB: TCOM) -- CRG has been compensated one hundred thousand shares, CRG has sold approx one hundred thousand shares.

TMI Holdings Inc. (OTCBB: TIMO) -- CRG has been compensated two hundred thousand shares. CRG has sold approx seventy five thousand shares.

Victory Capital Holdings Corp (OTCBB: VTYC) -- CRG has been compensated one hundred thousand shares, CRG has sold approx zero shares.

Viper Networks (OTC: VPER) -- CRG has been compensated one hundred thousand shares, CRG has sold approx zero shares.

Viseon, Inc. (OTCBB: VSNI) -- CRG has been compensated fifty thousand shares, CRG has sold approx twenty thousand shares.

Viva International, Inc. (OTCBB: VIVI) -- CRG has received one hundred and fifty thousand shares. CRG can recieve up to two hundred and twenty five thousand shares. CRG has sold approx fifty thousand shares.

It is not clear how what some view as truly exhorbitant fees are channeled to CRG, especially if the companies themselves are somehow supportive of the payments, and how either the overhang or actual selling benefits either the payers or the shareholders of such companies.Eresearchtechnology, Inc. (NASDAQ: ERES) just on the basis that such payments to acknowledged touters in which management is involved, reflected, in the analyst's view, negatively on management's decision-making capabilities.

For up-to-the-minute news, features and links click on financialwire.net 

For FinancialWire audio clips, click on partner ON24 at on24news.com 

FinancialWire is an independent, proprietary news service of Investrend Information, a division of Investrend Communications, Inc. Additionally, Investrend provides a wide range of forums, independent research and webcasting platforms for shareholder empowerment. For more information or to receive the FirstAlert daily summary of news, commentary, research reports, webcasts, events and conference calls, click on investrend.com 



URL: financialwire.net 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/22/2003 2:39:05 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
RE:SIERRA/RICHARDSON->DID A YANKEE GET CAUGHT STEALING?

If it isn’t Bucky Dent, it’s Aaron Boone. Unsung heroes abound for the Yankees. - the New York Yankees, that is. And so, it will be at least one more year (and probably more than that) before the Boston Red Sox exorcise the ghost of the Bambino. Anyway, they can commiserate with the cursed Cubbies, who share a penchant for disaster.

But not every Yankee is a winner. There may be magic in the pinstripes, but not in the name. Just ask Yankee Financial Group, Inc., a brokerage firm located on New York’s Long Island, home to some of the brokerage industry’s best known penny stock firms.

As it happens, Long Island is closer to Shea Stadium, home of the hapless Mets, than to The House That Ruth Built. That may explain why the old New York Yankee magic is missing. The NASD says that Yankee Financial was caught stealing. On October 16, 2003, the NASD filed a complaint, charging Yankee Financial, and its former branch manager, with operating a high-pressure boiler room sales operation that defrauded investors of $8 million.

According to the NASD complaint, the boiler room operated out of Yankee Financial’s Brooklyn and Staten Island branches, where brokers used aggressive sales tactics, misrepresented facts, made baseless price predictions, and failed to point out material facts, in order to persuade customers to invest in three highly speculative Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) securities: Silver Star Foods, Inc.; Western Media Group Corp.; and Golden Chief Resources, Inc.

The NASD says that Yankee Financial brokers often targeted the elderly and others for whom these investments were patently unsuitable.

As the following indicates, the three companies that were being touted by Yankee Financial’s brokers had dubious credentials:


• Silver Star Foods purported to be a distributor of pre-packaged frozen pasta products purchased from suppliers. According to its Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2001 the Company had no revenues, total current assets of $100,883, and had essentially ceased doing business. Its accountants had expressed “substantial doubts” about its ability to continue as a going concern.

• According to its Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2001, Western Media Group Corp had total assets of $46,284, including $3,494 in cash, liabilities of $6,452 and a net operating loss of $1,248. The filing also noted that one customer had historically accounted for almost all of the company’s revenues. The Company’s accountants noted that it had only enough revenue to stay in business for twelve months..

• Golden Chief Resources, Inc. claimed to hold gas and oil interests in Texas and Louisiana. According to its Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2001, the Company had no operations from 1986 to 1999, then re-entered the development stage, and was entirely dependent on raising new capital but had had “little success” doing so. The report said that Golden Chief Resources had total assets of $23,802, including $102 in cash, total liabilities of $717,316 and a net operating loss of $994,678. Its accountants expressed “substantial doubts” about its ability to remain in business.


Also charged were a number of Yankee Financial executives and brokers, including Richard F. Kresge, the brokerage firm’s President and majority owner, who has been cited for fraudulent sales practices and failure to supervise. Gary Giordano, former Yankee Financial branch office manager, was charged with fraud for making unsuitable recommendations and for failing to supervise brokers in the Brooklyn and Staten Island offices. Charges against Joseph C. Korwasky, Yankee Financial's former compliance officer, included failing to report customer complaints to NASD.

NASD’s surveillance efforts revealed that a number of other individuals involved with Yankee Financial, Sierra Brokerage Services, and Argus Securities, participated in these efforts by improperly pressuring customers to purchase shares, or otherwise participated in the unlawful scheme. According to the NASD, most of the shares sold by Yankee Financial to its customers came from offshore accounts maintained by Sierrra.

As a result of NASD's investigation, 11 individuals were permanently barred including:

• Kenneth Gliwa, Yankee Financial's former Vice President, who settled charges that he failed to supervise the firm's branch offices, allowed two unregistered persons to hire brokers and operate the Brooklyn and Staten Island branch offices, failed to conduct any meaningful review of the three securities to determine whether they were suitable investments for the firm's customers, and allowed the firm to operate without any written supervisory procedures;

• Jeffrey Richardson, Sierra's President and head trader, settled charges that he participated in an unlawful distribution of unregistered shares, which generated millions of dollars for offshore entities controlled by the two individuals who owned and operated Yankee Financial's Brooklyn and Staten Island branch offices;

• Lawrence Dugo, a Yankee Financial broker, and Samuel Barmapov, an Argus broker, settled charges that they used fraudulent sales practices in recommending shares to investors; and


Several other individuals were charged with failing to appear and testify before the NASD.

Make no mistake about it. This group of Yankees is headed for the Hall of Shame. (10/21/2003)



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/22/2003 2:40:57 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
"According to the NASD, most of the shares sold by Yankee Financial to its customers came from offshore accounts maintained by Sierrra."

"Make no mistake about it. This group of Yankees is headed for the Hall of Shame. (10/21/2003)"



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/22/2003 6:27:42 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Investors Lose Billions in Stock Scam

Victims Worldwide

NEW YORK, Oct. 22 /PRNewswire/ -- Kessler International announced today
the results of a six month investigation into an organized crime entity which
has bilked investors out of billions of dollars and is growing. The scheme
involves identity theft by corrupt venture capital firms, the establishment of
a fake professional association by the fraudsters to legitimize their scam,
the sale of fake investments by boiler room operations, and the use of mail
drops and high-pressure sales tactics.
Kessler's investigation which has only touched the tip of the problem has
already revealed at least six corrupt venture capital firms which have or are
taking countless numbers of investors in the United States, Europe and
Australia of their hard earned cash by lying about their firm's reputation and
expertise. A number of these so called firms have simply copied the website
text including biographies and pictures of prestigious venture capital firms
and changed the names to their liking to make themselves appear legitimate.

HOW IT WORKS
According to a number of victims interviewed by Kessler's staff and
investigation of various documents, the victim usually receives either a cold
call from a smooth talking salesman touting an investment to good too be true
or an unsolicited e-mail. They gain the trust of the victim by describing the
firm's past successes and amount of research that goes into every offer. The
firm they are working for usually appears prestigious using international
offices (which very often are mail drops or virtual offices so the fraudsters
cannot be traced) and a fancy website.
During the first call the salesmen usually does not attempt to sell
anything but instead requests permission to call again. In subsequent
telephone calls they begin to tout certain companies and encourage the victim
to take advantage of a great investment or otherwise lose out on a
"guaranteed" high return investment. Usually they indicate that the offer is
only available to a select group.
This syndicate has even established a fake professional association
website mirroring the website of a legitimate venture capital association.
The member list of this association was stolen and the corrupt company's name
inserted among the prestigious firms. When the victim asks for references to
check out the investment, they are directed to this fraudulent website.
When the victim is ready to invest they are told to make a wire transfer
to an overseas bank account and then are usually besieged with telephone calls
to increase their investment.
After obtaining funds in an amount the fraudster feels the victim will
invest the victim usually never hears from the salesman and attempts to reach
him or obtain information about their investment go unanswered.

AVOID BEING A VICTIM
Michael Kessler, CFE CrFA the President and CEO of Kessler International
suggests that any investor follow these simple guidelines before making an
investment into an unknown entity.

* Be cautious of "guaranteed returns," "No Risk" and "secret"
investments.
* Ask questions about the investment and beware of promoters that do not
answer all of your questions.
* Research before investing. Use the Better Business Bureau website, the
SEC, and the NASD websites and the various state regulatory agencies
websites and look for fraud alerts. Use a search engine seeking
information about the company you're dealing with as well as the
company you're investing in. We have found that many websites list
horror stories from victims which, if researched prior to sending cash
would have saved some peoples' life savings.
* Don't share personal information with the caller until you know who you
are dealing with.
* Don't wire funds overseas.
* Most important: Follow your instincts, and when in doubt "JUST SAY NO."

Kessler International, the recognized leader in Forensic Accounting and
Corporate Investigative Strategies specializes in all facets of white collar
crime detection. Headquartered in New York Citywith offices worldwide, Kessler
International protects the interests of Fortune 500 companies in the global
marketplace.
For more information about Kessler International or about the results of
this investigation contact Michael Kessler at 212-286-9100 or visit their
website at investigation.com. 

CONTACT: MICHAEL KESSLER CFE, CrFA
Telephone: 212 286-9100



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/23/2003 3:12:04 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
MORE BAD NEWS FOR YOU GOELO. SEE FLEMING GOT NAILED

United States of America
Before the
Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities Act of 1933
Release No. 8309 / October 23, 2003
Administrative Proceeding
File No. 3-11311

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the Matter of

Research Capital, LLC,
Carl L. Smith, III,
Richard Craig Hall,
IR Specialists, Inc. and
Wayne H. Jenkins,

Respondents.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS, MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 8A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it appropriate that public cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), against Research Capital, LLC ("Research Capital"), Carl L. Smith, III ("Smith"), Richard Craig Hall ("Hall"), IR Specialists, Inc. ("IR Specialists") and Wayne H. Jenkins ("Jenkins") (collectively "Respondents").

II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondents have submitted Offers of Settlement (the "Offers") which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission's jurisdiction over them and the subject matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, Respondents consent to the entry of this Order Instituting Public Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Order"), as set forth below.

III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondents' Offers, the Commission finds1 that:

FACTUAL SUMMARY
1. This matter involves a common abuse found among certain small publicly held companies. In recent years, many such companies have hired stock promoters to tout their shares on stock-picking websites and through mass-mailed e-mail messages (commonly known as "spam"). The promoter is often compensated in the form of purportedly unrestricted shares of the company's common stock, which the promoter sells after its touting has attracted investor interest in the company.

2. Under the federal securities laws, a public company cannot distribute unrestricted stock to public investors without first registering the offering with the Commission or having a valid exemption from registration for the transaction. Registration requires a company to provide important information about its finances and business to potential investors, and allows the Commission to review the company's disclosures. In an attempt to circumvent those registration requirements, certain issuers have sought alternate sources of purportedly "free trading" company stock in order to compensate the stock promoters. In such arrangements, the issuers and promoters are nonetheless participating in an unregistered offering of securities to the public in violation of the federal securities laws, as described below.

RESPONDENTS
3. Research Capital is a Florida venture capital company that seeks to invest in genomics-based biotechnology companies.

4. Smith, 34, of Osprey, Florida, is the managing member and sole owner of Research Capital.

5. Hall, 33, of Sarasota, Florida, is the President of Research Capital.

6. IR Specialists, a Rhode Island corporation, promotes small cap companies on its website, TipReporter.com.

7. Jenkins, 36, of Hope, Rhode Island, is the sole officer and director of IR Specialists.

OTHER RELEVANT ENTITIES
8. Research Investment Group, Inc. ("RIG"), a Florida corporation, promotes small cap companies by hiring others to mass distribute e-mail messages and faxes touting its corporate clients.

9. Scott H. Wilding ("Wilding"), 42, of Pembroke Pines, Florida, is the sole officer and director of RIG.

10. Tyler T. Fleming ("Fleming"), 33, of Las Vegas, Nevada, promoted small cap companies from 2000 through 2002 on his website, WallStreetWest.com, and through an electronic newsletter, Wall Street West Newswire. Fleming conducted his stock promotion business through two corporate entities he controls, SmallCap Solutions, Inc. and Complete Financial and Operations, LLC.

11. SmallCap Solutions, Inc. ("SmallCap Solutions"), is a Nevada corporation used by Fleming to conduct his stock promotion business. Fleming is SmallCap Solution's sole officer and director.

12. Complete Financial and Operations, LLC ("Complete Financial") is a Colorado company also used by Fleming in his stock promotion business. Complete Financial registered the trade name WallStreetWest.com, LLC with the state of Colorado. Fleming is the sole member of Complete Financial.

THE UNREGISTERED DISTRIBUTION
13. In or around November 2001, Research Capital hired RIG to promote an issuer, whose common stock was traded on the OTC Bulletin Board (the "Issuer").

14. Research Capital was affiliated with the Issuer. Research Capital and its principals, Smith and Hall, owned approximately 18% of the Issuer's outstanding shares, and agreed to provide the Issuer with $1 million in working capital and to establish a public relations campaign for the Issuer. The Issuer had no significant revenue-generating activity and was nearly completely funded by, and dependent on, Research Capital.

15. Research Capital and RIG entered into an agreement under which RIG would establish a promotional campaign for the Issuer in exchange for an option to purchase up to 4,000,000 purportedly unrestricted shares of the Issuer from Research Capital and its principals at $0.025 per share. At the time, the Issuer's stock was trading at approximately $0.075 per share.

16. Shortly thereafter, RIG's sole officer and director, Wilding, exercised a portion of this option and purchased 3,300,000 shares of the Issuer from Research Capital and its principals. The shares, which came from Hall's and Smith's personal holdings, were deposited into Wilding's personal brokerage account.

17. RIG's Wilding subcontracted with Fleming and his company, SmallCap Solutions, to perform a portion of the promotional work in exchange for 150,000 purportedly unrestricted shares of the Issuer. Smith transferred 150,000 of his shares of the Issuer to SmallCap Solutions on December 27, 2001. The shares were deposited into SmallCap Solutions' brokerage account. Fleming, as the sole officer and director of SmallCap Solutions, was the sole signatory on the company's brokerage account.

18. RIG also subcontracted with Wayne H. Jenkins and his company, IR Specialists, to perform a portion of the promotional work in exchange for 400,000 purportedly unrestricted shares of the Issuer. Under the agreement, IR Specialists would "e-mail blast" messages touting the Issuer to 8,000,000 potential investors, and arrange for profiles about the Issuer to be posted on its website and on other stock-promotion websites. As compensation, IR Specialists received 400,000 shares of the Issuer from Smith on January 2, 2002. The shares were deposited into IR Specialists' brokerage account. As IR Specialists' sole officer and director, Jenkins was the sole signatory on the company's brokerage account.

19. SmallCap Solutions posted a profile of the Issuer on the SmallCap Solutions website on or about January 5, 2002. That website was operated by SmallCap Solution's President, Fleming, under the business name Complete Financial. IR Specialists' promotion began at around the same time. Within several days, daily trading volume of the Issuer's shares rose over 600% above the volume in the preceding month.

20. Between January and April 2002, Fleming sold the shares of the Issuer that SmallCap Solutions had received from Smith on the open market for $6,005. Between March and July 2002, IR Specialists and Jenkins sold most of the stock they had received from Smith on the open market for $5,980. In addition, in the weeks following the promotional activities, Wilding sold the shares that RIG had received from Smith for $121,715.

21. No registration statement was filed with the Commission or was in effect as to the shares of the Issuer's stock sold by RIG, SmallCap Solutions, or IR Specialists. Because these stock promoters had obtained the shares from persons directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by the Issuer, or under direct or indirect common control with the Issuer, with a view to distributing the stock to the public, the stock was not exempt from registration. As a result, the securities were restricted and could not be sold to the public within a year after they were acquired by the promoters. Therefore, the securities transactions described above violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.

VIOLATIONS
As a result of the conduct described above, Respondents violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act, which prohibit the offer or sale of securities through the mails or in interstate commerce, unless a registration statement has been filed or is in effect as to such securities.

IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions specified in Respondents' Offers.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

A. Respondents cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.

B. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that IR Specialists, Inc. and Wayne H. Jenkins shall, within 10 days of the entry of this Order, pay disgorgement and prejudgment interest in the total amount of $6,337.22 to the United States Treasury. Such payment shall be: (A) made by United States postal money order, certified check, bank cashier's check or bank money order; (B) made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission; (C) hand-delivered or mailed to the Office of Financial Management, Securities and Exchange Commission, Operations Center, 6432 General Green Way, Mail Stop 0-3, Alexandria, Virginia 22312; and (D) submitted under cover of a letter that identifies IR Specialists, Inc. and Wayne H. Jenkins as Respondents in these proceedings, the file number of these proceedings, a copy of which cover letter and money order or check shall be sent to Robert L. Mitchell, Assistant District Administrator, Securities and Exchange Commission, San Francisco District Office, 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 1100, San Francisco, California 94104-4691.

By the Commission.

Jonathan G. Katz
Secretary

Endnotes
1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondents' Offers and are not binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.

sec.gov 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 10/23/2003



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/30/2003 9:32:36 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Connery settles fraud suit telegraphindia.com 

Los Angeles, Oct. 30 (AFP): Superstar Sean Connery has agreed to an “amicable resolution” of a $17-million fraud lawsuit he brought against the producers of his movie Endgame, both sides said.

The 73-year-old Scot actor and the original James Bond screen spy withdrew his suit against Mandalay Pictures and its chairman, Hollywood mogul Peter Guber, both sides announced yesterday. According to a joint statement, the settlement includes a dismissal of Connery’s lawsuit, as well as Mandalay’s countersuit and “withdrawal of all allegations of fraud.”

The actor sued a year ago, alleging that Mandalay fraudulently purported to be in a position to finance the action thriller which he had agreed to star in for a $17-million fee.

He accused Mandalay of stringing him along for two years “in an attempt to hold themselves out to the entertainment industry as a viable production company,” and claimed that Guber cut off all communication with him as production was due to begin, leaving him in the dark.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/31/2003 11:02:42 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
WOW FRANCOIS, FWEB (FINANCIAL WEB A/K/A STOCKDETECTIVE) WAS A STOCK BROKER SCAM THAT LIFTED THE STOCK PRICE.

nasdr.com 

YOU CAN READ ALL ABOUT IT HERE.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/31/2003 6:12:40 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
SEC Adds Link on Web Site for Tips
From Bloomberg News
October 31, 2003

The Securities and Exchange Commission has changed its Web site to show that it welcomes tips from whistle-blowers after state regulators took the lead in exposing trading abuses in the $7-trillion mutual fund industry.

The SEC has been criticized for lagging behind New York Atty. Gen. Eliot Spitzer and other state regulators who developed mutual fund cases based on tips from people inside the industry. Last week, SEC enforcement chief Stephen Cutler sent a memo to his staff telling them to pay closer attention to tips.

This week, the SEC added a link for enforcement tips on the left side of its Web site, which the agency uses to disclose breaking news or highlight its activities. Visitors to sec.gov  also are offered a link in the investor information section for "tips and complaints." Both links connect to the SEC Center for Complaints and Enforcement Tips.

"This is part of a concerted effort to ensure that tips and complaints are handled appropriately and expeditiously," said Laura Cox, a spokeswoman for SEC Chairman William H. Donaldson.

Earlier this week, the SEC and Massachusetts state regulators filed fraud charges against Boston-based Putnam Investments and two former money managers, Omid Kamshad and Justin Scott.

Massachusetts officials said the Putnam allegations were first raised by Putnam employee Peter Scannell, who took his complaints to the SEC's Boston office in March. Scannell in September turned to the office of William Galvin, Massachusetts' secretary of the commonwealth, after the SEC didn't act on his tip.

Cutler said Wednesday that he was reviewing what happened with Scannell's tip. In an Oct. 24 e-mail to his staff, Cutler said the enforcement division's office of Internet enforcement was now logging all incoming tips and how each was handled.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)10/31/2003 6:48:30 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Internet Scam Cayman Link

A company spamming e-mail addresses with offers on making "free money" is reported to be based in George Town, giving an

Internet Scam Cayman Link

According to egy.com, its Internet domain was fraudulently used in a bulk e-mail marketing scam involving a supposed Cayman Islands company, Modern Limited ­ Cayman Web Development.

In this particular scheme, the spammers requested US$39.95 from site visitors, to learn how to make "free money." The Domain Name Server for the contact organisation of the website advertised by the spammers resolves to Modern Limited as Administration Contact and Technical Contact, and gives a George Town postal address and telephone number.

However, attempts by Cayman Net News to contact this organisation have proved fruitless. Although the post office box in question is one used by a prominent local law firm, that firm has denied any knowledge of the company and, furthermore, the Companies Registry has no record of a company of that name being registered here.

Similarly, the listed telephone number is a fax number of the same law firm.

That same post office box number is used by another company that controls internet domain names called Dreamzone Enterprises, and as is the case with Modern Limited ­ Cayman Web Development, the Companies Registry has no record of that company being registered in the Cayman Islands. However, there are no registered complaints known against Dreamzone Enterprises, and no link to Modern Limited except that both control internet domain names and both use the same George Town post office box number.

Modern Limited has been the subject of a number of complaints to the Internet's governing body, ICANN, in relation to the questionable registration of more than 2,200 domain names that look similar to well-known trademarks and names. The National Arbitration Forum said in recently published findings that many of the domain names registered to Modern Limited are identical or confusingly similar to valuable, registered and famous trademarks, e.g. toshibalaptop.com, yamahadirtbike.com, yamahadirtbikes.com, nelson-mandela.com and theweatherchannel.com.

This practice is known as "cybersquatting".

Typically, the trademark owners have been successful in wresting control of these domains from Modern Limited by means of ICANN's arbitration process under its rules for domain name dispute resolution. In April 2003, the owner of georgiaboot.com was able to gain control of georgiaboots.com, which had been registered by Modern Limited. In January 2003, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, one of the world's leading pharmaceutical companies, was similarly able to take control of boehringeringelheim.com, which had also been registered by Modern Limited.

However, these recovery efforts incur no small expense for the trademark owners and doubtless Modern Limited hopes to cash in on the nuisance value by extorting money for the release of the domain in question. Furthermore, Internet users are deceived into visiting Modern Limited's own web portal when they really wanted a site that has something to do with, for example, Toshiba laptop computers.

It is a relatively simple matter to trace the domain name servers for these spurious sites and, in one case at least, the domain is hosted by Yahoo Stores, with a Los Angeles organisation listed as the contact name.
Further developments in this matter will be reported in Cayman Net News as further information becomes available.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/5/2003 8:04:17 AM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
How about Spitzer for new head of SEC?

Wednesday, November 05, 2003


What the federal Securities and Exchange Commission needs is Eliot Spitzer.

For a state attorney general, Spitzer seems to track down fraud on Wall Street better than the SEC whose mission is to keep an eye on the stock investment crowd.

The New York state attorney general’s latest foray into Wall Street dealings has created headlines about some damaging goings-on in the mutual fund industry. His inquiries have pushed Congress into asking where the SEC has been while these alleged abuses were going on.

KEY POINTS
BACKGROUND: Congress is asking questions as to why the Securities and Exchange Commission was slow to discover trading abuses in the mutual fund industry.
CONCLUSION: New York state Attorney General Eliot Spitzer seems to be more aggressive in pursuing Wall Street abuses and would make a forceful chairman of the SEC should the federal government be looking for a new man at the helm.


The mutual fund industry, the repository of the nest eggs of many average Joes, was considered a prudent way to invest for those who aren’t skilled in picking individual stocks.

What Spitzer unearthed was that managers of some funds were dealing after hours for the benefit of a few select clients or engaging in other practices to the financial detriment of other investors.

It isn’t the first time Spitzer has taken on some Wall Street investment houses and brought them to the bar of justice for unethical practices.

Maybe Spitzer is flashier in the way he goes about pursuing wrongdoing, overshadowing the low-key way the SEC works.

Or maybe he gets more tips about abuses in investment firms because he seems to get faster and better results.

Whatever it is, Spitzer seems to take on even the giants of Wall Street without hesitation while the SEC seems to lumber along, or do nothing.

Congress and SEC Chairman William Donaldson are now talking about imposing new curbs on fund trading to prevent insider trading and other abuses.

Spitzer has a few ideas of his own to prevent the abuses that have come to light.

Perhaps even Congress is partly to blame.

In the heady 1990s, when the stock market behaved like a magic money machine, the talk in Congress was of less, not more, regulation.

That rhetoric was popular with both government officials and the public.

But what the mutual fund industry abuses show is that when big money is at stake, the temptation to take shortcuts or engage in improper practices for self-enrichment can be overwhelming.

Without proper regulations, and a vigilant and energetic agency to keep a critical eye on the goings-on, abuses happen.

What the SEC needs is a Spitzer at the helm to ride herd on the Wall Street crowd for the benefit of ordinary investors who aren’t privileged to know about manipulative practices among some money managers that amount to an abuse of trust and a diminution of returns.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/8/2003 10:22:54 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
re:MICHAEL MARKOW->MEALEY'S Emerging Securities Litigation

Special Motion To Strike
Properly Denied For Securities
Fraud, Unfair Competition Claims

LOS ANGELES — Free speech rights about a public issue were not a key issue in a state securities fraud suit that included unfair competition; thus, the defendants’ special motion to strike was properly denied, a California appeals panel ruled Sept. 4 (Robert Van Hoose v. Michael M. Markow, et al., No. B162761, Calif. App., 2nd Dist.; 2003 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 8423).

(Opinion available. Document #58-031006-101Z.)

The Second District Court of Appeal, affirming the Los Angeles County Superior Court, said the complaint did not concern the defendants’ interest in a public issue.

Dot-Com Bust

At issue was Robert Van Hoose’s lawsuit against Michael M. Markow and Robert Highstreet, two businessmen who solicited Van Hoose’s investment in a dot-com company, Shopss.com, during the Internet business boom in 1998. Van Hoose alleged that Highstreet and Markow, in a series of telephone conversations, lied about the prospects of Shopss.com to get him to invest. Van Hoose purchased shares of Shopss.com and lost almost all of his investment.

Van Hoose sued the defendants for negligent misrepresentation, fraud and unfair competition under Business and Professions Code Section 17200 and unfair business practices under Business and Professions Code Sections 17045 and 17048. All the defendants except Highstreet filed a special motion to strike, which was denied. Highstreet is not a party to the appeal.

Burden Not Met

The panel said the defendants had not met their initial burden of showing that the speech in question was a matter of public interest. The defense argued that the discussion over the phone of publicly traded securities counted as a matter of public interest, but the appeals panel rejected the argument.

“In the present case, defendants’ acts, allegedly misrepresenting the nature of investments in shares of corporate stock, were not in furtherance of their free speech rights in connection with a public issue. This lawsuit is about whether defendants misrepresented, in private communications with plaintiff, the nature of the investments. It concerns a private dispute,” Presiding Justice Paul Turner wrote for the panel.

“Mr. Markow was not engaged in a public interest dialogue involving a publicly held corporation. He simply sought to induce plaintiff to purchase shares in two corporations. This was not a matter of general public interest within the meaning of the [anti-SLAPP statute],” the court said.

Markow is represented by Michael C. Baum and Andrew V. Jablon of Resch Polster Alpert & Berger in Los Angeles and Ari Markow in Encino, Calif. Van Hoose is represented by David Paul Steiner and Paul E. Katz of David Steiner & Associates in Los Angeles.

mealeys.com 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/10/2003 1:14:19 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Ramps Up Recruitment; Washington, DC-area Firm to Lead 4-year Executive Search Campaign

WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 10, 2003--The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has awarded a four-year executive recruiting contract to JDG Associates, Ltd, a Washington, DC area executive search firm. With offices in Washington, DC and Rockville, Maryland, JDG will assist the SEC in mounting a nationwide recruiting effort to fill over 300 senior-level positions, including Economists, Securities Compliance Examiners, MBAs, CFAs, IT Specialists, Accountants, and Attorneys.
"We will be launching an aggressive national recruitment effort," said JDG President Joseph DeGioia, "so that the SEC can expedite its hiring process." President Bush signed legislation this summer that gives the SEC authority to exempt applicants from the standard federal hiring process. DeGioia also said that the expedited SEC hiring process is intended to fulfill the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which mandates corporate governance of publicly-held companies. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed in July 2002 in response to several high profile accounting scandals at Enron, WorldCom, Tyco and other public companies.

The SEC was established in 1934 to protect investors, fight fraud, and to maintain the integrity of securities markets. Headquartered in Washington, DC, and relatively small by federal agency standards, the SEC has a staff of approximately 3,100 staff, with 11 regional and district offices throughout the country.

JDG Associates has been serving the executive recruitment needs of corporations, associations and non-profits, the Federal government, research and consulting organizations, and defense contractors since 1973. For more information about JDG Associates, visit jdgsearch.com. 

Contacts


JDG Associates, Ltd
Sandra Kubalak, 301-340-2210



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/11/2003 1:07:41 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
Securities fraud earns prison Anderson man gets 7 years for $1.4 million scam


November 11, 2003 — 3:12 a.m.
A 67-year-old Anderson man pleaded no contest Monday to securities fraud and bilking investors of more than $1.4 million, the Shasta County district attorney's office said.

Under a plea bargain, Roger Alvin Sande, who will be formally sentenced Nov. 24, will serve seven years and four months in state prison.

Sande, who was arrested in October 2001 for allegedly cheating 18 investors, had been charged with 55 felony counts arising from the sales of viatical settlements.

Viatical settlements are investments in the life insurance policies of people who claim to be terminally ill.

"These investments are extremely risky since the investor is betting on when and if the terminally ill person will die," the district attorney's office said.

Sande represented to investors that the investments were risk-free, the district attorney's office said.

"Those investors who took Sande at his word lost thousands, and even hundreds of thousands of dollars," officials said.

A part of the agreement, Sande pleaded no contest to the sale of a security by false statement or omission, sale of a security without a securities license and theft from an elder-dependent adult.

The district attorney's office said many of the victims in this case were senior citizens who lost money that they had saved for their retirement.

"Sande sold extremely risky investments to people who could not afford them, and then failed to tell the people just how risky those investments were," said Shasta County Deputy District Attorney Josh Lowery.

Sande also admitted to Shasta County Superior Court Judge Steven Jahr that he engaged in a pattern of white-collar crime that led to investors losing $1,498,142, the district attorney's office said.

Meanwhile, Sande's associate, Scott Allan Moody, 42, who is also facing felony securities fraud charges, is tentatively set to go to trial Feb. 10, according to court records.

A Dec. 15 settlement conference date has also been set in his case.

Reporter Jim Schultz can be reached at 225-8223 or jschultz@redding.com.





Tuesday, November 11, 2003



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/11/2003 6:29:10 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
Ex-con delivers message on fraud. Felon to tell forum it's not just CEOs with hands in till

By David Milstead, Rocky Mountain News
November 11, 2003

Walter Pavlo, according to a lengthy article in Forbes magazine, is a "convicted felon and an accomplished liar." He will speak Thursday at the Leadership Denver Alumni Association Fall Forum.

Wait: It all makes sense. The topic of the Fall Forum is "Leadership in Ethically Challenging Times." And Pavlo, released from prison, is working for the Young Entrepreneurs Alliance spreading a message that he first developed in speaking to an FBI class on white-collar fraud.


Advertisement




"What happened to me can happen to anyone in business who makes the wrong decisions," he said.

What Pavlo decided to do, he says, is assist MCI in hiding its bad debts in the early 1990s.

This is not the former WorldCom, mind you; instead, it's the old MCI that WorldCom acquired in the late 1990s. WorldCom, bankrupted by fraud, has changed its name back to MCI.

Pavlo also skimmed several million dollars of cash for himself, using tricks he said he learned at MCI. Ultimately, Pavlo served more than 18 months in prison for money laundering and obstruction of justice.

"I'm not looking for forgiveness in this," Pavlo said. Instead, he's spreading the message that misdeeds occur well below the CEO level.

After Pavlo's remarks, a panel featuring George Sissel, former chairman and CEO, Ball Corp.; David Maldonado Jr., president, Iliff School of Theology; and Lt. Col. Jeff Nelson, U.S. Air Force Academy, will discuss what can be learned from his experiences.

The Fall Forum is Thursday at 3:15 p.m. at the Denver Metro Chamber Building, 1445 Market St. The LDAA Fall Party will be held immediately following the Forum at 5:30 p.m.

The cost is $25 for the panel discussion or $55 for the panel discussion and party.

For reservations, contact Toi Jones, Denver Metro Chamber Foundation, at toi.jones@denver- chamber.org or 303-620-8078.





milstead@RockyMountainNews.com or 303-892-2648



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/12/2003 11:33:28 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
SHORT SELLING BASHER FRANCOIS GOELO MAKES SCORE IN MARKETS. EVEN THOUGH AT ONE TIME HE STATED HOW EVIL IT WAS TO SHORT A STOCK THAT YOU DID NOT OWN, FRANCOIS MAKES WINNING TRADE

From: Napolion (172)
Reply To: None
Stock Symbol: SMTI Date: Tue November 11, 2003 11:48:08 AM
Message #: of 518894

>>>SMTI covered short position: support @$5.15/DEMA 50, rebound??...

POLITICS: Those are my personal views and opinions, so don't confuse them with facts or an attack on your own beliefs. I don't get upset or foul-mouthed about contrary views and neither should you...

STOCKS: Doubt all that you read on the Boards and Invest only what you can afford to lose gracefully...



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/13/2003 12:34:39 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Illinois Securities Department: Penny Stocks

Penny Stocks

Investors in penny stocks are believed to lose all or some of their investment 70% of the time. Some authorities believe that the presence of fraud in that market may push the figure up to 90%. Eight years ago, 55 penny stock firms were headquartered in just six states. Today an estimated 325 penny stock firms have set up main offices in 29 states, employing several thousand brokers at more than 1,000 branch offices that now reach into America's smallest communities.

One of the most notorious penny stock firms of the 1980's was First Jersey Securities. That firm was closed by the SEC in 1987 and its founder and chairman, Robert Brennan, was ordered to pay $71.5 million for defrauding clients in a manipulation scheme. The SEC charged that the firm created an artificial demand for the securities of six companies because First Jersey was orchestrating both the buying and selling of the securities. The federal court judge noted that the proven scheme was probably only the tip of the iceberg, as First Jersey had over 500,000 customer accounts and a sales force of 1,200 brokers during its heydey in the mid 1980's. The judge described the scheme in detail and noted that Mr. Brennan was "completely without remorse."



216.239.41.104 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/13/2003 5:48:08 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
FRANCOIS, I DON'T SEE A LETTER FROM YOU ON THE SEC'S WEB SITE IN REGARD TO NAKED SHORT SELLING. YOUR "BONA FIDE INVESTOR" LINES WHERE FAMOUS ON SI

sec.gov 

I GUESS WHEN YOU WHERE FOUND OUT TO TRUELY BE A CROOKED PENNY STOCK CROOK AND PROMOTER YOUR OLD TYPE OF LETTER TO THE SEC JUST END. sec.gov 
--------------------------------------------------

"Of course, much more needs to be done but finally, in my opinion, we are getting
some action and regulations to protect investors a lot better. Keep up the good
work ! It is needed !

Respectfully Submitted,

F. Goelo"
========================================
WAITING FOR YOUR JUDGEMENT DAY!! sec.gov 
---------------------

Subject: Comments about naked shorting....
Date: 12/07/1999 1:07 PM


Dear SEC

I am writing in regards to the proposed law concerning the short selling of
OTC-BB stocks(Proposal # S7-24-99). The naked shorting of OTC-BB stocks should
be eliminated.

One of the main reasons why "penny" stocks are so risky and volatile is not
solely because of the companies themselves, but because of the rampant naked
shorting by market makers and offshore brokers, mostly without having to borrow
the shares and without "up-tick" or any other limitations.

This activity goes unchecked everyday and must be dealt with accordingly.
Unchecked and out-of-control chaos and deception seems to run rampant day after
day.

Unregulated Shorting is used as another weapon against bona fide investors who
are squuezed out by unscrupulous manipulators and shorters.

The abolition of naked shorting in conjunction with the requirements of being
fully reporting will ensure a more fair and equitable market for investors and
companies alike, a market where a company's true value is reflected in the price
and not distorted, suppressed or inflated artificially by manipulation.

Of course, much more needs to be done but finally, in my opinion, we are getting
some action and regulations to protect investors a lot better. Keep up the good
work ! It is needed !

Respectfully Submitted,


F. Goelo



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/13/2003 6:16:38 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
"Goelo xmas mall experience, as told by F G +++ :"

By: smoking_gunn0
01 Feb 2002, 03:25 PM EST Msg. 10543 of 13151
(This msg. is a reply to 10542 by F_Goelo.)
Jump to msg. #

Goelo xmas mall experience, as told by F G +++ :

A couple of weeks ago, as Christmas was
approaching, I was rushing around
> trying to get some last minute shopping done. I
was stressed out and not
> thinking very fondly of the Christmas season
right then. It was dark,
> cold,
> and wet in the parking lot of the mall as I was
loading my car up with
> gifts
> that I felt obligated to buy. I noticed that I
was missing a receipt that
> I
> might need later, so mumbling under my breath, I
retraced my steps to the
> mall entrance.
>
> As I was searching the wet pavement for the lost
receipt, I heard a quiet
> sobbing. The crying was coming from a poorly
dressed boy of about 12
> years
> old. He was short and thin. He had no coat. He
was just wearing a
> ragged flannel shirt to protect him from the cold
night's chill. Oddly
> enough, he was holding a hundred dollar bill in
his hand. Thinking that
> he
> had gotten lost from his parents, I asked him
what was wrong. He told me
> his sad story. He said that he came from a large
family-three brothers
> and
> four sisters. His father had died when he was
nine years old. His mother
> was poorly educated and worked two full time
jobs.
>
> She made very little to support her large family.
Nevertheless, she had
> managed to skimp and save two hundred dollars to
buy her children
> Christmas
> presents. The young boy had been dropped off at
the mall by his mother on
> the way to her second job. He was to use the
money to buy presents for
> all
> his siblings and save just enough to take the bus
home. He had not even
> entered the mall, when an older boy grabbed one
of the hundred dollar
> bills
> and disappeared into the night.
>
> "Why didn't you scream for help?" I asked.
> The boy said, "I did."
> "And nobody came to help you?" I wondered aloud.
> The boy stared at the sidewalk and sadly shook
his head.
> "How loud did you scream?" I inquired.
> The soft-spoken boy looked up and meekly
whispered, "Help me!"
>
> I realized that absolutely no one could have
heard that poor boy cry for
> help. So I grabbed his other hundred and ran to
my car.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/14/2003 10:40:45 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Started By: Francois Goelo Date: May 5, 2001  3:24 PM REPORTING ABUSIVE MARKET MAKING ACTIVITIES

This thread is dedicated to making public the ABUSIVE activities of Market Makers, as one often sees on Level II, including stock manipulation, collusion to fix prices, one sided trading, where a MM remains on the ask or the bid for days on end without attempting to promote an "orderly Market", abusive "Naked Shorting" in violation of Rule 3350, etc.......

Here is a case in point, where the MM's in question are being reported to NASD and SEC by a number of shareholders, since it's the only way Authorities ever take notice...

Message 15754230

Eventually, it's hoped that NASD and SEC will keep an eye on this thread to get a clue as to what the Market Makers are up to, from the people who make the whole exercize possible, the shareholders...

Complaint Forms:

sec.gov 

nasdr.com 

Thread's Rules:

This is a moderated thread where Personal Attacks, Spam, Senseless Bashing, Libelous Statements, Violation of Privacy, etc... will lead to the immediate banning of the poster concerned...

JMHO, F. Goelo + + +


Subject 51166



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/14/2003 10:44:50 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Started By: Francois Goelo Date: Nov 7, 1999  10:09 PM SHPS: shopss.com, PROFITABLE INTERNET BUSINESS...

1) Profile: shopss.com 

SHPS has just been spun off by its Parent Company, OSCR... "The OSCM unit sold consists of shopss.com, a virtual shopping mall that enables committed shoppers to purchase a variety of consumer goods, electronics and books via the Internet, and CCM Computer Accessories, Inc., which assembles computers and owns and operates customer fulfillment centers that function as warehouses and shipping facilities for products ordered on the virtual mall."

biz.yahoo.com 

2) Share Structure:

+ Outstanding: 22 Millions shares

+ Float: 2 Millions shares

+ Cash on hand: about $20 Millions

3) Third Quarter Earnings:

biz.yahoo.com 

+ Revenue: $20 Millions

+ Earnings: $6 Millions

+ Projected EPS: third Quarter EPS has come out at about 27 cents... The Company is growing exponentially and IMO, a forward EPS of $2.00+ for Year 2000 should easily be expected...

4) Recent News:

biz.yahoo.com 

biz.yahoo.com 

5) Conclusion:

Fully Reporting SHPS is hitting the ground running with a prosperous Business undergoing explosive Growth, $20 Millions in cash to finance further development and excellent Positive Earnings. My forward EPS Projection for Year 2000 exceeds $2.00 and even with a modest (for a profitable Internet Business) PE of 25, we could see the share price appreciating towards the $50.00 range within one year... This is only my opinion and not a recommendation... Potential investors should carry out extensive Due Diligence and only invest what they can afford to lose...

Message 11745835

Regards, F. Goelo + + +


Subject 31642



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/16/2003 3:23:14 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Grammy-nominated polka musician agrees to plead guilty to fraud

PHILADELPHIA Nov 16 - A Grammy-nominated polka star will plead guilty to charges that he defrauded investors in 21 states through the sale of unregistered securities, according to court documents filed this week.

Jan Lewan, whose 1979 defection from Poland launched a successful career that included performances before President Ronald Reagan and Pope John Paul II, illegally persuaded investors to pump money into a series of failing business ventures, according to documents filed in U.S. District Court in Scranton.

``To keep getting money in, he started making representations he knew were false,'' Assistant U.S. Attorney Gordon Zubrod said Friday. ``When his financial need got worse, he began to represent that the business was even better ... when he knew the business was steadily deteriorating and couldn't hold together.''

Lewan, who is accused of mail and wire fraud, faces a maximum of 10 years in prison and a US$500,000 fine. His plea agreement indicates that prosecutors will ask for a reduced sentence.

Mark Kohan, editor of Polish American Journal, said Lewan has been a fixture on the polka circuit for years. ``Ninety-nine percent of your polka musicians are guys who have jobs and are weekend warriors. But this cat was doing it full time,'' he said.

Lewan, a 1995 Grammy nominee for best polka album for ``Jan Lewan & His Orchestra,'' formed JRD Productions Inc. in 1988 to promote his appearances and sell merchandise. From his base in Hazleton, Lewan also published a newsletter and mail-order catalogue, had his own radio show and operated a travel business that took groups through Poland, Germany, Italy and other countries.

Lewan, who offered promissory notes that were supposed to pay an interest rate of 12 to 20 percent, used a series of phony charts and graphs to convince potential investors that his businesses were prospering, when in fact their financial condition was ``rapidly deteriorating,'' court documents said.

Investors lost between US$2 million and US$2.5 million, Zubrod said.

Without elaborating, Lewan's attorney, Frank Nocito, said Friday that the polka musician did not set out to defraud anyone. Lewan, of Hazleton, has an unlisted phone number and could not be reached for comment.

Lewan, who filed for bankruptcy last year, has dealt with a number of personal and professional setbacks.

In 1998, his wife, Rhonda, was stripped of her title as Mrs. Pennsylvania after an investigation found that judges' scorecards had been altered. Four people were charged with rigging a public contest, although two were found innocent at trial and charges against the other two were dropped.

In 2001, two members of Jan Lewan & His Orchestra, including Grammy-winning accordionist Thomas Karas, died in an automobile crash in South Carolina while on their way to Florida for a string of performances.

Lewan (whose name is pronounced YAHN leh-VAHN) still faces state charges in Delaware, where two families allegedly lost a total of US$87,000 after investing with the bandleader, according to court documents. - AP



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/18/2003 1:26:09 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
CWTD.OB 10:28am 0.63 +0.63 +629,900.00%



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/18/2003 2:42:14 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Two ostrich farming brothers are on trial in the Port Elizabeth High Court for allegedly defrauding the Land Bank of nearly R7 million.

Cornelius Schmitt, 44, of Stellenhof in Addo, and his brother, Johannes, 49, of Alfalfahof, De Rust, pleaded not guilty to six counts of fraud.

In their plea explanation the brothers, who are being defended by advocate Francois van Zyl, SC, on the instructions of attorney Paul Roelofse, senior, admitted that while they both applied for a total of R6 930 000 in loans from the Land Bank, it was done without intent to defraud the bank.

Land Bank loans division head Petrus van Straaten testified that the brothers individually and on six occasions applied for loans during March 1997 and May 1998 for the wholesale purchase of ostriches.

The State, represented by advocate Martin le Roux, alleges the brothers provided the bank with falsified invoices pertaining to purchases in order to secure loans.

Van Straaten said Cornelius Schmitt initially applied for a R2.4 million loan on March 17, 1997, to purchase 3300 ostriches, at R750 each, from a Archibald Hitgem, of the farm, Hitgeheim.

The bank only granted him R1.5 million payment, which was subject to documental proof of purchase.

Three months later, on June 4, 1997, Johannes Schmitt asked for a loan of R2 550 000 for the purchase of 3400 ostriches from Springfields Farms. The loan was granted.

The brothers subsequently made further, similar loan applications totalling more than R6. 9 million up to May 1998.

Van Straaten said the Schmitt brothers never used the money for the purchase of ostriches and the sales invoices and receipts issued to the bank were falsified.

The case continues today.

Eastern Province Herald



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/18/2003 3:59:19 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
Update on Regis Possino L-AIR lines. otc pk (LAIR)a/k/a (LIAR)

L AIR HOLDING (Other OTC:LAIR.PK) Quote data by Reuters

Last Trade: 0.001
Trade Time: Oct 28
Change: 0.00 (0.00%)
Prev Close: 0.001
Open: N/A
Bid: N/A
Ask: N/A
1y Target Est: N/A



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/19/2003 8:59:21 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
Saxena has all the comforts of home

David Baines
Vancouver Sun

Saturday, November 15, 2003

For seven years, financial fugitive Rakesh Saxena has been holed up in Vancouver while Canadian authorities decide whether to return him to Thailand to face charges that he conspired to embezzle $88 million from the Bangkok Bank of Commerce.

For the past 51/2 years, the 51-year-old businessman has been under house arrest in a $785,000 condominium at 1600 Hornby Street Since May 2000, when his extradition hearing ended, he has not once left the premises, not even to visit a dentist or doctor. That's nearly 31/2 years of straight confinement.

He says 24-hour security arrangements and legal expenses have been costing him $50,000 US per month. That adds up to about $4.4 million Cdn, plus the $1 million cash and $1 million surety he has had to post as a condition of his house arrest.

The money doesn't seem to bother him. He says his net worth, prior to his arrest in Whistler in 1996, was about $400 million, and he still has "a couple of hundred million dollars" worth of cash, stock and other paper assets in a Swiss account, albeit frozen at the request of Thai authorities.

But surely being confined to an 1,800-square-foot cage, no matter how gilded, for such an extended period must be an agonizing experience.

"You get used to it. What can you do? It's life. You carry on, you make the best of it," he replies.

He hasn't seen his wife, 11-year-old twin boys or 12-year-old daughter since his arrest in Whistler in 1996. Doesn't he miss them?

"Yeah, but you get used to it. These are things you have to live with."

It could be several more years before the case is decided. That means several more years of house arrest. If he was in a real jail, with real bars, wouldn't he have cut some sort of deal by now?

"Oh, I'm too strong for that. They [Thai authorities] tried that for four months while I was at the pre-trial centre [after his bail was revoked in 1998]. They told me, 'We will give you bail if you come back, don't worry about that.' No way, no way, no way. There's no urgency. That's not going to affect me one bit."

After more than a hour discussing his case and his current life of confinement, I get the distinct impression that he means it. Although barely five-foot-five, he is psychologically tough enough and intellectually smart enough to out-point his opponents.

"I am so sure we are going to win the case that I could actually write the brief now," he says.

?

From 1990 to 1996, Saxena worked as treasury adviser to the Bangkok Bank of Commerce. In June 1996, Thai authorities charged him, bank president Kirkkiat Jalichandra and four others with embezzling $88 million from the bank.

According to Thai authorities, Saxena lent the money to a private company which he controlled, ostensibly to buy three telecommunications companies, but he didn't use the funds for the stated purpose. Rather, he used them to repay personal loans and he sent some of the proceeds to his personal account in Switzerland. Then he moved to Vancouver.

But this was just one of hundreds of bad loans that were made under their stewardship. Thai officials contend that, by the end of 1995, the bank had made $4.3 billion in risky or bad loans, including advances to politicians and company executives who provided little or no collateral.

In May 1996, the Thai finance ministry seized control of the bank and had to inject a billion dollars to keep it solvent. The Thai press described it as the biggest criminal fraud in the country's history. Thai interior minister Suchart Tanchoroen, who had been a beneficiary of some of the loans, resigned in disgrace.

On July 7, 1996, Saxena was arrested at the Chateau Whistler by a posse of RCMP officers while having lunch with some Thai police officers. He carried $100,000 cash in his briefcase. A former associate, Vancouver chartered accountant Les Hammond, would later tell court that Saxena intended to give the money to Thai officers as a bribe to ensure special treatment if he returned to Thailand.

Bribes and other forms of corruption, Saxena says matter-of-factly, were a way of life in Thailand and many parts of the world where he did business. He later admitted to B.C. Supreme Court Frank Maczko that he personally gave Suchart $4 million US cash to enable him to buy votes in the 1995 Thai general election.

"Bribery, you know, is not a bad word in Thailand," he told Vancouver Sun reporter Ian Mulgrew.

After his arrest in Whistler, Saxena was hustled off to jail, but within several days he was released on $1 million cash bail and a $250,000 surety.

Canadian justice department officials, acting at the behest of the Thai government, asked the B.C. Supreme Court to extradite him. The hearing started on Oct. 30, 1996.

?

Free on bail, Saxena was free to develop his business interests, which were as eclectic as they were exotic.

One was a bauxite prospect in Sierra Leone, which he wanted to sell to a Vancouver Stock Exchange company called Global Explorations Corp. However, his plans were interrupted when Sierra Leone's president, Ahmad Tejan Kabbah, who had granted the licence, was deposed by rebel forces.

Saxena figured that if he could help get Kabbah back in power, he would not only get back his bauxite licence, Kabbah might give him some diamond concessions. So he sent Kabbah $1 million "just to buy the goodwill of the country" and began negotiating with a South-African-based mercenary force called Executive Outcomes to provide the necessary muscle to get Kabbah reinstated.

However, the plans were put on hold in August 1997 when word of a possible counter-coup leaked out, thereby spoiling the element of surprise.

Many Canadians were shocked that someone who was the subject of an extradition hearing could plot coups in Third World countries, but Saxena coolly noted there was nothing in the terms of his bail that prevented him from engaging in such dealings.

"Obviously, if the Canadian government passes a law saying it can't be done, then it can't be done," he said.

?

In January 1998, RCMP re-arrested Saxena and returned him to jail for allegedly trying to obtain a phony passport and threatening a witness. Attempts to obtain his release on bail were rejected until June 1998 when his lawyer, Russ Chamberlain, asked Judge Wally Oppal to approve a novel form of house arrest.

Saxena would provide $1 million cash bail and a $1-million surety, then confine himself to his False Creek condominium. He would not leave the premises except to deal with medical matters, go to court or see his lawyer, and he would not ingest any drugs or alcohol. To ensure he did not breach the terms of his bail, he would pay $40,000 per month to Intercon Security for round-the-clock supervision.

Mulgrew reported that after Oppal agreed to the terms, RCMP officers "bristled visibly" and federal prosecutor Deborah Strachan "wiped away a tear." The Sun suggested in an editorial that the arrangement could remove any impetus for Saxena to expedite the extradition process.

"There is something to be said for the uncomfortableness of a jail cell to dissuade its occupant from stalling or seeking to slow the process of justice," the newspaper noted.

?

The remark was prophetic. The extradition hearing ran for nearly four years, from Oct. 30, 1996 to July 2000. Maczko sat for a total of 99 days and endured innumerable delays as Chamberlain raised every possible objection, including a claim that, if his client was returned to Thailand, he would be extra-judicially killed as a scapegoat.

Meanwhile, Saxena became engaged in the dubious business of acquiring shell companies, marrying them with dot-com businesses and floating them on the virtually unregulated OTC Bulletin Board in the United States.

During hour and a half lunch breaks at his extradition hearing, he would confer with shadowy stock facilitators such as promoter Don Rutledge, who had run into problems with regulators in B.C., Alberta and the United States, and Toronto broker Stephen Taub, who had been previously suspended and fined by the Toronto Stock Exchange for trading violations.

In 2000, the stock market collapsed and along with it, Saxena's flimsy stock deals. He left huge unsatisfied debits in his brokerage accounts. At least four brokerage firms filed suit, but he claims many of the firms were active participants in these deals and have not been anxious to press the matter. As a result, he says, "most of the cases just fizzled out."

As the market was collapsing, there was another significant development. Maczko released his verdict in the extradition case, which he described as the longest and most difficult in Canadian history.

"I find there is evidence on which a trier of fact, properly instructed and acting reasonably, could convict Mr. Saxena of fraud, which is an extraditable offence," he said in his September 2000 decision.

However, under Canadian law, that does not mean that Saxena is automatically put on a plane to Thailand. The case in now in the hands of the Canadian justice minister, who must consider the many objections that were outside the purview of Maczko.

For example, the minister must decide whether the extradition treaty (a 1911 agreement between the United Kingdom and Thailand) applies to Canada, and if it does, whether conspiracy is an extraditable offence under that treaty. He must also decide whether Thailand meets minimum standards for human rights and would give Saxena a fair trial if he is returned. Saxena also contends that a revamping of the Thai constitution nullified his arrest warrant.

When the justice minister will rule on these questions is anybody's guess. But even if he orders his extradition, Saxena says he will appeal to the B.C. Court of Appeal and, if necessary, to the Supreme Court of Canada.

In other words, Saxena will likely spend several more years in his Hornby Street condo, but if this prospect depresses him, he gives no indication.

Since the stock market collapsed in 2000, he has worked as an economic adviser, offering advice on how private investors can do business in difficult parts of the world, such as Russia.

He also writes a daily and weekly economic report, which he distributes to clients around the world. He says the reports are designed to stimulate interest in his advisory services. All told, he says, these business pursuits generate about $30,000 per month.

"A lot of this stuff may not be comprehensible to your readers -- this eight hours of research every day -- but this situation (his forced confinement) gives you the opportunity to exploit the positives to the extreme without having that temptation of saying, 'Okay, we'll just have one glass of wine and we'll come back.' "

He has retained at least one vice, smoking. He consumes about 21/2 packs a day. And he doesn't exercise. "I did buy one or two exercise machines, but I'm not one who ever went to the gym, so it didn't work out."

He denies that his strategy is to drag out his extradition proceeding for so long that everybody loses interest. "It's not in my hands right now," he correctly points out, although it will eventually come back into his court.

He even suggests that the Thai government doesn't want him any more. "I don't think so, but I'm speculating."

The speculation does not appear valid. "No, our government still wants him to be sent back to Thailand to answer the charges," says Athasit Poolsawat, an official with the Thai consulate in Vancouver.

Asked whether he is frustrated by the delays, Athasit diplomatically replies: "We don't have a comment. We are working closely with your ministry of justice. We understand your system. Everything has to be according to Canadian law."

Then he adds: "My country hopes that we can finish this matter very soon."

dbaines@png.canwest.com

© Copyright 2003 Vancouver Sun



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/22/2003 8:55:45 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
U.S. ATTORNEY PROBES BEAR STEARNS' FUND TRADING

By JENNY ANDERSON

November 22, 2003 -- Bear Stearns' mutual fund trading practices are being probed by the U.S. Attorney's office - and just about every regulatory agency under the sun - the firm disclosed in an SEC filing yesterday.
Also investigating the firm are the Securities and Exchange Commission, the New York Attorney General. The New York Stock Exchange and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission have requested information as well.

Regulators are looking at mutual fund trading practices at many financial institutions, including hedge funds that engaged in improper trading, broker-dealers who helped facilitate such trades and mutual funds that allowed practices often discouraged in the fund's prospectus.

The practices under the microscope include market timing - the rapid trading of shares that is not illegal but can have negative long-term effects on returns - and late trading, which is illegal.

The focus of the various inquiries into Bear Stearns is unclear, but the firm has massive clearing operations, processing trades for a wide swath of other brokerage firms. That brings into question what the firm knew about clients under investigation for late trading or market timing.

The Post first reported that Bear Stearns was being investigated by the SEC and New York Attorney General's office for its mutual fund practices. That information was revealed in a subpoena issued by the Philadelphia office of the SEC to brokerage house Brean Murray, which had a market timing group and cleared its trades through Bear Stearns.

Bear Stearns fired four brokers and two assistants last week in an action related to mutual fund trading activity.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/22/2003 8:57:33 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
FIRMS MAY GO BUST: SPITZER

By JENNY ANDERSON

November 22, 2003 -- New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer expects firms to go out of business as a result of the mutual fund investigation he launched in September, he told The Post late yesterday.
That stance is different from his approach to investigating major Wall Street brokerage firms for conflicts of interest in their research last year.

"The rules that have been violated have been clear; the criminal acts that we have seen evidence of are pervasive and beyond the pale," Spitzer told The Post.

"As a consequence, certain entities will face what boiler rooms and other similarly situated entities have faced - they will be prohibited from doing business."

Spitzer has been joined by the SEC, NASD and U.S. Attorney's office in its inquiry into improper mutual fund trading.

The investigations have rattled the $7 trillion industry, as evidence of wrongdoing among portfolio managers and mutual fund companies has emerged on a daily basis.

The investigation also includes the role of brokers who facilitated trades and hedge fund managers who were, in some instances, making the trades.



Spitzer also told a crowd at the New York Society of Security Analysts that he expects "individuals will face criminal charges."

This week, the SEC and Spitzer filed civil fraud charges against Gary Pilgrim and Harold Baxter, founders of mutual fund company Pilgrim Baxter & Associates, for securities fraud.

The SEC and Massachusetts regulators filed civil fraud charges against Putnam and two of its investment managers related to market timing activities.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/24/2003 4:34:23 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Lenawee County's 'Dumbest' criminals

Police officers share their stories about criminals who prove crime doesn't pay -- and isn't a smart choice

By David Panian and Paul Wetter, Telegram Staff Writers

Lenawee County Sheriff Larry Richardson has met his share of dim-bulb perps in his day, mostly in his 31 years as an Adrian police officer and detective.

"The number-one dumbest thing for a crook is they're going to deny it. Even with any kind of evidence there, deny, deny, deny," he said. "They're going to want to make you believe them. If you don't believe them, they get upset big-time.

"If they were smart they wouldn't have been here in the first place."

Then again, sometimes people do own up, even if they could get away.

Getting the runaround

One time as a patrolman, Richardson responded to a problem at a downtown Adrian bar. The suspect, a male college student, bolted from the scene and Richardson ran after him.

"I was young, probably on the force about three or four years at the time," Richardson said. "I wasn't fast, but I could run and keep my own. He was leaving, running, and I took off chasing him, and this guy was leaving me in the dust. He was just leaving me.

"I guess it hurt my pride more than anything, here this guy was leaving me so bad."

The chase wound through alleys and side streets before Richardson lost sight of him in the darkness.

"I'm getting exhausted and I stopped. I said, the heck with him and went back (downtown)."

So while Richardson was walking back, who should appear beside him but the guy he'd been chasing.

"Why? Why did you stop and come around?" Richardson asked the young man.

"I didn't know where I was going. I was lost," was the reply.

"So he came back and we took him to jail."

Eagles nest

Another time Richardson and other officers responded to a break-in alarm at the Eagles Club on North Winter Street. They searched the building over and over, but couldn't find anyone. But they knew someone was inside.

"Finally I tried a door that led to the boiler room and went in there and there were these two suspects laying in there, dead asleep," he said. "It was cold outside, they came inside, and they fell asleep. They tried to tell us they got lost and they just was sleeping there for the night, but they had glass on their hand, one had broke his hand from breaking a window, and they pleaded guilty."

Interstate travel

Sometimes it appears criminals hope to get a judge that reads the law very literally. Richardson encountered that once in the mid-1980s while investigating a case involving a 26-year-old man and his underage girlfriend.

"You know the old standby, you don't transport minors across state lines because it's a federal crime? Well, we had this one case and we had this one guy, he was about 26, and his girlfriend was 13 years old. So he took her and took off, and they were going down South.

Richardson put out a "be on the lookout" for the man and girl, and authorities in Virginia picked them up.

"We got him back up here and there was one thing he wanted to make clear, that he did not take her across state lines. Every state line he would get to, he would stop and make her get out and walk across," he said.

"I was thinking this guy was kidding. I talked to the girl, and she said, 'Yes. Every state line we got to, he made me get out so he wouldn't get in trouble for taking me across state lines.'

"She was 13 and he was 26, so it didn't make a whole lot of difference there."

Braggin' taggin'

Sometimes artists and authors will take up a pseudonym, either out of embarrassment, a desire for privacy or just to be clever. One young man in Adrian should have tried to be as creative when signing his artwork as he was with the art itself. Richardson investigated the graffiti case about a decade ago.

"In the early '90s, we had the graffiti by gang members here in town," he recalled. "It was called 'taggin',' like graffiti on buildings and walls, and we were cracking down on it. If you do some dumb stuff like that, we're going to charge you with (malicious destruction of property).

"So this one kid, he's taggin'. I guess he watched this stuff on 'West Side Story' and he went and signed his name on this stuff.

Richardson took a photo of the graffiti to the kid and asked him if it was his.

"Yeah, pretty good, huh?" the boy replied.

"Yeah, but you made a mistake. You wrote on the side of a building, and that's MDOP."

"'How do you know I did it?"

"You signed your name to it."

"He admitted to it, but it was one of those things," Richardson said. "He was proud of it. It was good work, too, but we charged him with MDOP."

High-fiber diet

Sometimes criminals will do anything to get out of a charge -- rat on buddies for a lesser charge, jump in a river to try to escape, eat some evidence and so on.

Richardson worked on a number of sex crimes as an Adrian detective, and in the early 1990s he had a rape case where the victim couldn't identify the rapist but described how he talked and behaved, which helped Richardson and his partner, Detective Jeffrey LaBarr, identify the suspect.

"So we brought him in and tried to get him to cop out to it," he said. "We talked to him and talked to him, and he wouldn't cop out. Me and my partner, we spent a couple hours, and he wouldn't cop to it."

With the suspect following the "deny, deny, deny" principle, Richardson and LaBarr had to change tactics.

"We went out and got a prop," Richardson said. "We got a lady's set of panties."

They went back into the interrogation room, put the undergarments -- which were evidence from an actual shoplifting case -- in front of the man and explained the situation to him.

"We know you did it," the detectives told him. "These panties have DNA on them, and we're going to convict you of it because your semen was there."

The man was unimpressed.

"I didn't do it."

"My partner called me outside to talk to me, so we left the panties on the desk," Richardson said. "When we came back inside, we were going to repeat the same line of interrogation, and, boom, the panties were gone."

"Where are those panties?" Richardson asked the man.

"What panties?"

"The panties I left on the desk there. Where are they?"

"I don't know. I didn't see them."

They frisked the man and searched the room, but still couldn't find the underwear.

"He had eaten the panties," Richardson said. "They were gone."

Sabbath day

And then there are stories that fit the Cole Porter song, "Let's Call the Whole Thing Off," with the lyric, "You say toe-may-toe/I say toe-mah-toe."

"We had one guy. This guy wasn't smart at all," Richardson said. "He was one of the dumbest criminals we've had."

The man was a suspect in a robbery case and was expected to plead guilty, but after receiving some legal advice the case went to trial.

"They called him to the stand and he said, 'I'm going to take the Fifth Commandment.' " Richardson said.

The judge was Lenawee County Circuit Judge Rex B Martin, and he looked at the defendant and said, "Don't you mean 'amendment'?"

"No, I mean commandment."

"Do you know what 'commandment' is?"

"Yes, sir. I take the Fifth Commandment."

"No, no. You've made a mistake," the judge said. "Commandment is what God gave to Moses."

"That's what I'm going to take, all right."

"Everybody (in the courtroom) was cracking up," Richardson said.

The Ten Commandments are not in a fixed numerical order, unlike the Bill of Rights in which the Fifth Amendment protects people from testifying against themselves.

Cold case

Sometimes, it's just good to have a warm place to spend the night, even if it is in jail.

Richardson found himself at a reported break-in of a house that sits next to some woods. It was a January in the late 1970s or early '80s, and it was 25-30 degrees below zero.

"It was one of the coldest winters we've had in Michigan," he said. "We stayed in the (patrol) car in front of the house. We had one car at the front side of the building and one on the back side of the building. We thought the guy probably had run out of the house and went into the woods, but we hadn't gone through the house yet. We were waiting for another car to come.

"We were sitting there waiting for the other guys to come by with the dog to go into the house when all of the sudden we heard someone open the back door (of the car) and hop in. It was the crook who had broken into this house. He said, 'It's cold out there. Please take me to jail.'

"We took him to jail."

On the right foot

Sometimes, crimes are committed by people who are under the influence of one substance or another. Other times, people don't pay attention to what they're doing. When those situations come together, the result can be memorable.

"There was a shoe store in the 100 block of South Main Street, so this guy broke into the shoe store," Richardson said. "Cleared the windows out. Cleared all the shoes out of the window. He cleared them out big-time. Took 'em home and everything."

Officers tracked the suspect to his apartment on Chandler Street and found the shoes, but it was unclear what the thief would have done with them.

"The store owner had just put out shoes for the right foot. So we (recovered) about 30 shoes for the right foot," Richardson said. "I don't know what he was going to do, but he had been drinking."

Bailing out

Michigan State Police troopers Brett Sojda and Bill Denniston once found themselves in a high-speed chase in Dover Township after a driver wouldn't stop for a seat belt infraction.

"We're chasing them and you can tell there's two (people) in the car," Sojda said.

As the two cars raced down the dirt section of Cadmus Road with the suspect vehicle pulling away, the suspect made a left turn. Sojda and Denniston caught up after the car stopped and the driver fled into a field. Sojda said he went to check the car for the passenger and there was no one there.

"We had to go back and check the (in-car) video" to find out what happened to her, Sojda said.

They found that when the car made its left turn off Cadmus, the female passenger had bailed out of the car, which barely slowed, and rolled into a ditch.

"It took us a couple weeks to find her to make sure she was OK," Sojda said.

The driver escaped into some woods but was later picked up. Sojda said he had left his paycheck stub in his car, so they were sure ofhis identification. It turned out he had been stopped for drunken driving a month before and didn't want to get stopped again, and his passenger had been with him at the time of the drunken-driving stop.

Slow learner

Trooper Richard Northrup of the Michigan State Police post in Adrian recalled conducting follow-up investigations on a triple-fatality crash on County Line Highway involving a train that required him to make some trips between Adrian and Monroe. He said he was headed to Monroe at about 10 a.m. one day and stopped a young woman for passing in a no-passing zone and wrote her a ticket. Then at about 2 p.m. that afternoon he was returning to Adrian and again stopped a car in the same stretch of road for improper passing. He found it was the same woman he had stopped that morning.

"I didn't feel sorry about writing her a ticket the second time because she obviously didn't feel it was that serious of an incident the first time," Northrup said.

Bite out of crime

Tecumseh police have run into cases of criminal dolts, too. Office Gerald Poe recalls an incident in which a guy fell asleep in his pickup and woke up to find his teeth missing. It was in the late 1970s, and the guy was parked near West Russell Road and Adrian Street.

"A guy he owed money to came up and took his (false teeth) and held it as collateral," Poe said. He couldn't recall for sure if the man had taken his teeth out and put them on his dashboard or if the perpetrator had removed the dentures directly from the victim's mouth.

The story did make the national news, though.

Swimming and eluding

Poe had another case on May 9, 2002, when he tried to pull over a guy for speeding on Brown Street. It was 6 p.m. and Poe thought something was odd when the driver stared at him as they passed, going in opposite directions. The man sped off when Poe turned around to pull him over. He turned onto Bishop Reed Drive, drove to the end of the road, jumped out of his car and ran through a corn field toward the River Raisin.

As the man neared the water, Poe called out, "You don't want to jump in because the water's --"

Then the man jumped in.

"-- cold."

The 22-year-old swam across the river, then back again before being apprehended by police. He was charged with drunken driving, having open intoxicants in his vehicle, fleeing and eluding and speeding.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/24/2003 4:38:06 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
REGIS POSSINIO'S L-AIR CREW GROUNDED->Nine indicted in $33 million stock fraud
JEFFREY GOLD
Associated Press
Posted on Mon, Nov. 24, 2003


NEWARK, N.J. - Nine people were indicted in a $33 million securities fraud, accused of defrauding investors over four years by creating demand for a penny stock through Internet announcements and purchases designed to look like active trading.

Two Frenchmen who pleaded guilty in a related case were not charged but were named as co-conspirators.

At least three other people in their network have pleaded guilty in such schemes, which involved using what prosecutors called "reverse mergers" to help conceal a company's true owners.

"It's a business combination mechanism that permits a private company to become a public company" without having to go through initial public offering requirements, Assistant U.S. Attorney Mauro Wolfe said.

The three-count indictment, handed up by a federal grand jury in Newark on Nov. 6, was unsealed Monday.

Federal authorities arrested two of the accused on Sunday: Jean Pierre Collardeau, a French citizen living in New York, and Irving Freiberg of Muttontown, N.Y., and Boca Raton, Fla.

Warrants were issued for seven other defendants, including Collardeau's sister-in-law, Nicole Peignier of Gennevilliers, France; three French citizens who live in St. Martin, French West Indies; and a Swiss man. Also wanted were Fode Diop, a Senegal citizen living in Rego Park, N.Y., and Irving Stitsky, of Brookville, N.Y.

Each is charged with conspiracy to commit securities fraud, mail fraud and wire fraud; securities fraud; and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Each charge carries at least five years in prison.

The government seeks to seize $33 million from the defendants, as well as several of their homes, and bank and brokerage accounts.

Collardeau was held without bail Monday after appearing in federal court in Newark. Wolfe opposed any bail, asserting the suspect is a flight risk.

Defense lawyer Paul S. Brenner said Collardeau would not flee, saying he has U.S. and French citizenship, and his wife and children are in the United States. Brenner said he had not yet studied the 32-page indictment so he declined to comment on the charges.

Freiberg was held without bail pending a hearing scheduled Wednesday in federal court in West Palm Beach, Fla.

The indictment said Freiberg controlled Sutton Capital Corp. of Great Neck, N.Y., and Boca Raton, Fla., which controlled stockgenie.com, which promoted stocks on a Web site of the same name.

Sutton had no listed numbers. No reply was received to an e-mail seeking comment sent to the stockgenie site.

The indictment links the suspects to two Frenchmen, including one who illegally donated to the successful 1996 U.S. senate campaign of Robert G. Torricelli, who have pleaded guilty in the scheme. Torricelli quit the 2002 race after being admonished by the Senate for taking gifts from another illegal donor.

One of the Frenchmen was Philippe V. Hababou, who pleaded guilty in 2000 to violating campaign finance regulations and money laundering in the stock frauds. He was jailed for 22 months before his plea and was extradited to France.

The other, Marc Rousso, was the guiding force behind a series of what prosecutors "pump and dump" schemes in the mid-1990s involving tens of millions of dollars of low-priced stocks.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/24/2003 5:13:13 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
IN THE MATTER OF INVESTCO, INC.

An Administrative Law Judge has issued an Initial Decision in the matter of Investco,
Inc. The Initial Decision finds that Investco, Inc. (Investco) violated Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder
by failing to file its annual reports on Form 10-K for the years ended Dec. 31, 2001, and
Dec. 31, 2002, and its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31,
2002, June 30, 2002, Sept. 30, 2002, and March 31, 2003. The Initial Decision revokes
the registration of all securities of Investco, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Exchange
Act. (Initial Decision No. 240; File No. 3-11228)



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/25/2003 11:04:03 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Former local finance 'whiz' guilty of fraud
A jury finds former Miami Beach financier Marc Harris guilty using offshore methods to avoid $5.9 million in taxes. He will be sentenced Feb. 6.
BY CHRISTINA HOAG
choag@herald.com

Posted on Tue, Nov. 25, 2003


Marc M. Harris, the former Miami Beach whiz-kid financier, was convicted Monday of tax evasion, money laundering and conspiracy in connection with offshore schemes to cheat the Internal Revenue Service out of more than $5.9 million.

Harris, 38, set to be sentenced Feb. 6 by U.S. District Court Judge James I. Cohn, faces seven to nine years in prison, the IRS said.

After a two-week federal trial, a jury found Harris guilty in 16 of the 30 counts against him. The 14 not-guilty verdicts included charges of preparing false tax returns and tax evasion.

Defense attorney Joaquin Fernandez, however, said the case is far from over.

Fernandez said he will move to dismiss the 16 convictions as the alleged criminal incidents occurred in 1992, 1993, 1994 and 1998 -- beyond the five-year statute of limitations.

Judge Cohn had refused to previously dismiss the charges as he needed to hear the basis for the allegations, Fernandez said.

''Now the evidence is on the record,'' Fernandez sad. ``We're not finished by any means. We're not pleased but we're not crying either.''

The convictions mark an ignominious turn for Harris, a financial prodigy who graduated at age 18 from North Carolina Wesleyan College and was later named a ``distinguished alumnus.''

A few years later, after earning an MBA from Columbia University at age 20, he was bragging of managing $1 billion in assets through his web of offshore companies. Clients told a different story: They allege that he bilked them of millions.

For the past 13 years, Harris eluded prosecutors and irate investors while enjoying a bon vivant lifestyle that included Herms suits and Jaguar cars in Central America and a mansion in Chile.

At the request of U.S. authorities, the Nicaraguan government expelled Harris in June. He was returned to Miami to stand trial in connection with two cases of tax evasion. The cases involved clients of Harris who turned state's evidence against him, testifying that he had masterminded the schemes to dodge the IRS.

Fernandez said Harris had nothing to do with the plots carried out by father-and-son convicted Freon refrigerant smugglers, Tony and Joe Vigna, and health and beauty aid supplier Moises Kriger, who has charges currently pending.

The defense sought to portray Harris, who did not testify, as an accountant who helped small companies legitimately reduce their tax liabilities through foreign subsidiaries, in the manner of big multinationals.

Fernandez argued that others devised the schemes that the IRS said defrauded the U.S. of $5.9 million through sham returns, invoices, bills of lading, loans, mortgages and shell corporations.

Harris started his career as an accountant in Miami Beach. From there, he founded The Harris Organization, which authorities say helped investors dodge taxes through offshore shelters.

In 1989, claiming persecution from the IRS, he moved to Panama and founded corporations based in the Caribbean, Latin America and Europe. He settled in Nicaragua about a year ago.

Despite the distance, he was often in the sights of authorities.

A 2001 U.S. Senate report accused Harris of being ``behind a number of international bank and investment frauds, including banks that have been shut down by the British banking authorities for conducting illegal and fraudulent activities.''

''This is just the tip of the iceberg with Marc Harris,'' said Daniel Marchant, publisher of Offshore Alert, a Miami-based moneylaundering-investigative newsletter, which ran an exposé of Harris in 1998.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/25/2003 7:36:33 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
INVESTools Applies for Listing on the American Stock Exchange
Tuesday November 25, 6:01 am ET


HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 25, 2003--INVESTools Inc., (OTCBB:INVS - News), the market leader in fulfilling the lifelong education needs of self-directed investors, today announced that it has filed an Original Listing Application for its common stock on the American Stock Exchange.
Chairman and CEO Lee Barba of INVESTools Inc., said, "As part of our long term strategy to increase stockholder value, we have evaluated listing on a major stock exchange and concluded that the requirements of the American Stock Exchange and the quality of the specialist that will make a market in our shares is the most appropriate choice for the Company."

He noted that in the past two years, INVESTools has become the leader in educating self-directed investors, with nearly 90,000 graduates from its instructor-led and distance learning programs. Its strategic relationships with Business Week, CNBC and The Motley Fool are attracting a rapidly growing student body. In increasing numbers, the graduates of its courses are purchasing additional courses and services as part of INVESTools' lifetime value of the customer strategy. With more than 32,000 paying subscribers to its Web services, INVESTools has created a tremendous platform for continued growth in revenue and profits.

"If approved, a listing on the American Stock Exchange will expand INVESTools' visibility and market liquidity, which should have a positive impact on stockholder value," he added.

About INVESTools Inc.

INVESTools Inc. is a global leader in investor education. The Company offers a full range of investor education products and services that provide lifelong learning in a variety of delivery formats, including instructor-led workshops, "at home" study programs, personal training sessions and through the Web. Nearly 90,000 investors around the world have graduated from INVESTools investor education programs. For more information regarding the Company's products and services, visit INVESTools' corporate Web site at investools.com. 

"Safe Harbor" statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Except for historical information, the matters discussed in this news release that may be considered forward-looking statements could be subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those projected. These include uncertainties in the market, competition, legal proceedings, success of marketing efforts, timing of tax refunds and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company's SEC filings. The Company assumes no obligation to update the information in this release.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact:
INVESTools
Paul Helbling, 281-588-9102
paul.helbling@investools.com
or
Investor Relations:
Stern & Co.
Truc N. Nguyen, 212-888-0044
tnguyen@sternco.com



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: INVESTools Inc.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/25/2003 10:37:16 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
GOELO STOCKSCAMMER UPDATE->IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

U.S. Securities & Exchange : Commission, : Case No. C2-03-326 Plaintiff : Judge Holschuh v. : Magistrate Judge Abel Sierra Brokerage Services, et al., :

Defendants :

PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER

A preliminary pretrial was held November 13, 2003. Counsel

for all parties appeared.

Venue is proper in the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern

Division. Any motion to dismiss for want of subject matter

jurisdiction or for want of personal jurisdiction must be filed on

or before December 1, 2003. Jurisdiction is alleged under 28

U.S.C. §§1331 and 1332 and 15 U.S.C. §§77v(a), 77u(e), and 78aa.

Any motion for leave to amend the pleadings and/or to add

defendants must be filed on or before December 15, 2003.

The complaint alleges that between April 1999 and July 2000,

defendants manipulated the price of securities issued by Linux

Software Corporation ("Blue Point"), touted Blue Point's

securities, failed to report stock ownership, and participated in

unregistered sales.



2

The parties must serve written discovery on or before February

6, 2004. Counsel must confer on or before March 21, 2004 and set

aside a minimum of two days of depositions per side for April, May,

and June 2004. At this point defendants have failed to demonstrate

a need for more than ten depositions. Plaintiff requires no more

than ten. Each individual defendant may serve up to 40

interrogatories on plaintiff, but the total number of

interrogatories served on plaintiff may not exceed 250. The

related defendants are limited to 40 interrogatories.

Plaintiff's primary experts' Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures must be

made no later than September 1, 2004. Defendants' experts' Rule

26(a)(2) disclosures must be made on or before October 1, 2004.

Plaintiff will attempt to finalize its expert's database by

July 1, 2004.

Under the provisions of Rule 26(e)(2), Fed. R. Civ. P.,

counsel are under a duty "seasonably to amend a prior response to

an interrogatory, request for production, or request for admission

if the party learns that the response is in some material respect

incomplete or incorrect and if the additional or corrective

information has not otherwise been made known to the other party

during the discovery process or in writing." Counsel are DIRECTED

to review their clients' responses to written discovery on or

before July 23, 2004 and promptly make any supplemental disclosures

required by Rule 26(e)(2).



3

All discovery must be completed by November 28, 2004. Case-dispositive

motions must be filed on or before January 30, 2005.

These dates may be adjusted if there are rebuttal experts.

Joint Status Report. Counsel are DIRECTED to make a joint,

written status report to the Magistrate Judge on or before May 21,

2004. That report should:

• Indicate the discovery completed, the discovery remaining, and the date by which all discovery can be completed. • Set out the settlement positions of the parties and indicate whether they are interested in participating in a Settlement Week mediation. • Set out their deposition schedule for July, August, and September. • Detail the progress defendants have made in documenting each trade on the first day or two of trading. • If a defendant believes he needs to take depositions regarding these trades, he should list each proposed deponent and give a brief 1-3 sentence description of the scope of each deponent's examination.

As an alternative to a joint, written status report, counsel may

call my secretary, Marty Doré, at 614-719-3370 on or before May 21,

2004 to schedule a telephone status conference with me.

Counsel must make the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(3),

Fed. R. Civ. P. no later than 30 days prior to the date noticed for

the final pretrial conference. Alternatively, by agreement, the

parties may choose to make their Rule 26(a)(3) disclosures in the

final pretrial order.

s/Mark R. Abel United States Magistrate Judge



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/25/2003 11:07:09 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
forma pauperis, Poor Jerome->IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

U.S. Securities & Exchange : Commission, : Case No. C2-03-326 Plaintiff : Judge Holschuh v. : Magistrate Judge Abel Sierra Brokerage Services, et al., :

Defendants :

ORDER

Defendant Jerome Armstrong’s May 5, 2003 motion for the

appointment of counsel (doc. 4) is DENIED without prejudice to his

right to renew the motion. Any renewed motion for appointment of

counsel should include an executed financial affidavit. Attached

is a non-prisoner declaration in support of request to proceed in

forma pauperis . It should also set out the names of the attorneys

Mr. Armstrong has contacted and state why he was unable to reach an

agreement to retain them as his counsel.

Under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A), Rule 72(a),

Fed. R. Civ. P. and Eastern Division Order No. 91-3, pt. F, 5

either party may, within ten (10) days after this Order is filed,

file and serve on the opposing party a motion for reconsideration

by the District Judge. The motion must specifically designate the

Order, or part thereof, in question and the basis for any objection



2

thereto. The District Judge, upon consideration of the motion,

shall set aside any part of this Order found to be clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.

s/Mark R. Abel United States Magistrate Judge



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/28/2003 1:42:57 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Man Sentenced in Health-Club Stock Scam
By Associated Press
7:10 AM PST, November 26, 2003

SEATTLE -- A man who led a stock scam that bilked $93 million from people who believed they were investing in a lucrative health and fitness chain was sentenced to 20 years in prison and ordered to make full restitution.

The Znetix scam is believed to have defrauded about 5,000 investors over a seven-year period.

Kevin L. Lawrence, 37, of Bainbridge Island was the founder and former CEO of Znetix/Health Maintenance Centers and affiliates. He pleaded guilty in July to securities fraud and other felonies.

At his sentencing Tuesday, Lawrence was ordered to make restitution of more than $91 million. About $2 million has been recovered through the sale of forfeited property, including several boats, a Ducati motorcycle and luxury cars.

The defrauded investors were told that Znetix planned to create a new breed of medical centers that would combine fitness clubs with health care and medicine. They were told Znetix would be selling million-dollar licenses to operate health and fitness clubs, and that leading sports and entertainment figures had agreed to buy or license the operations.

They also were told Znetix would go public and be traded on the NASDAQ stock market at much higher prices than they had paid.

Five co-defendants have pleaded guilty, and six other defendants are awaiting trial.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/28/2003 2:30:49 PM
From: jjs64Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
Well being an American sure beats being a cheese-eating Nazi-collaborating surrender monkey FRANCe-OIS.

Exactly when is your USA court date again? I really don't want to miss it....I wonder how much you will enojoy USA prisons?

Cheese Eating Surrender Monkeys Cant Hide!

Buyer Beware!



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)11/29/2003 9:43:37 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
10) Jones Jensen & Company is a Utah company, which is engaged in the business of professional certified public accountants. Jones Jensen & Company were engaged by Wasatch International Corporation (now UBUY Holdings, Inc. f/k/a E-PAWN) as Certified Public Accountants charged with the responsibility of providing certified financial statements for E-PAWN and filing those certified financial statements with the appropriate regulatory authorities. Jones Jensen & Company knowingly or recklessly failed to timely prepare and file the required financial statements, as required by law.  As a result of the failure to file timely and correct financial statements, UBUY Holdings, Inc. f/k/a E-PAWN.com Inc., was not in compliance with filing requirements of the appropriate regulatory bodies and failed to uncover various fraudulent and illegal activities which were being perpetrated by various UBUY Holdings, Inc. f/k/a E-PAWN.com Inc., officers, directors and other control persons, both disclosed and undisclosed. Jones, Jensen & Company failed to report that there were 10 million shares of E-PAWN common stock that were missing and unaccounted for and that such shares were in the hands of both the GREYLING’S and the GLADSTONE’S and were being used by both the GREYLING’S and the GLADSTONE’S in furtherance of the “PUMP AND DUMP” scheme.  The results of Jones, Jensen & Company’s failures to properly and adequately conduct their audits and report the operating results of the Company properly and legally caused loss and damage to the Plaintiffs and all of the UBUY Holdings, Inc. f/k/a E-PAWN.com Inc., shareholders.

ubuyholdings.com 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/4/2003 10:16:39 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Dynacq Healthcare delays filing SEC reports
Stock dips as outlook weak for first quarter
By DARRIN SCHLEGEL
Dec. 3, 2003, 12:45AM


Copyright 2003 Houston Chronicle
Dynacq Healthcare shares fell Tuesday after the company said it requested an extension of up to 15 days to file its 2003 annual report.

The Houston-based company also said results for its first quarter, which ended Nov. 30, are expected to be lower than the year-ago period.

Shares of the company dropped to $15.94 Tuesday, down $2.11, or 11.7 percent.

Dynacq said it would postpone the release of its financial results for the year that ended Aug. 31 and the filing of its 2003 10-K, pending a review by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Dynacq spokesman Jim Baxter said the company has been working with the SEC to improve disclosure on its periodic filings and asked for the automatic extension so the review could be completed.

The company, he said, had already undertaken an effort to improve its Form 10-K disclosure before the SEC review. The SEC would not comment on the review.

In addition, the company said independent auditors have not completed their audit of the year-end financial statements.

Meanwhile, Dynacq said it expects lower first-quarter results because of costs involved with the renovation of its new surgical hospital in Garland as well as lower surgical activity at its hospital in Pasadena.

The company posted net income of $4.7 million on revenues of $17.9 million in the comparable period last year.

Dynacq owns hospitals in Pasadena, Garland and Baton Rouge, La., that focus on orthopedic surgery and neurosurgery.

The company said it plans to build a new surgical hospital in The Woodlands area, where it has purchased land and formed an operating partnership. The hospital will be built in two years, Baxter said.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/5/2003 2:32:12 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Hey Goelo, do you still call Alan Z. Wolfson on his cell phone?

Cheers Chump!!

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 18486 / December 3, 2003
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Wolfson, et al., 2:02 CV-1086 TC (D. Utah)
Robert Pozner, Former Trader at Glenn Michael Financial, Agrees to Fraud Injunction in SEC Market Manipulation Case
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on November 25, 2003, the Honorable Tena Campbell, United States District Judge for the District of Utah, Central Division, entered a Judgment of Permanent Injunction as to Robert Pozner of Ridgewood, New Jersey. Pozner consented to entry of the Judgment.

The Judgment against Pozner enjoins him from future violations of the antifraud provisions of the securities laws (Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder). The Judgment also orders that the Court will retain jurisdiction to decide the appropriate amount, if any, of disgorgement, prejudgment interest and penalties against Pozner. The Judgment further states that in any motion or hearing to determine the appropriate amount of disgorgement or civil penalties, Pozner will not contest his liability under the foregoing securities laws.

The Commission's Complaint alleged that Pozner, then a trader at a brokerage firm called Glenn Michael Financial Corporation, engaged in a scheme with other defendants from July through November 2000 to manipulate the public trading market for stock issued by Freedom Surf, Inc. (See Litigation Release No. 17756, September 30, 2002). Freedom Surf was then a start-up company with offices in Huntington Beach, California. The Complaint alleged that certain defendants transferred Freedom Surf stock at no cost to defendant Allen Wolfson. Wolfson, Pozner and other defendants then participated in a scheme to artificially run up the price of Freedom Surf stock. The Complaint alleged that Pozner and others advanced the bid quotation in Freedom Surf stock without relation to genuine market demand or worth of the company. The Complaint alleged that in less than two months, Pozner, at Wolfson's direction, and without client orders, bid up the stock from $5 to $35. The stock manipulation scheme perpetrated by Pozner and others appeared to shut down when SEC staff began investigating in November 2000.



sec.gov 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 12/04/2003



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/8/2003 1:45:11 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Vegas hypnotist faces fraud charges
LAS VEGAS, NV, December 8

A Las Vegas hypnotist, entertainer and self-help guru is on trial on charges of scamming people who signed up for a 10-week course where he promised they'd learn to become millionaires.

A lawyer for 41-year-old Marshall Sylver is blaming a few disgruntled customers, out of more than one-thousand clients.

Pending felony charges didn't stop Sylver from appearing until recently at the Palms hotel-casino.

(Copyright 2003 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/8/2003 2:22:04 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Calif. psychic gets two years in prison for fraud
BY JESSIE SEYFER
Knight Ridder Newspapers
Posted on Mon, Dec. 08, 2003

(KRT) - A Half Moon Bay, Calif.-based self-proclaimed psychic was sentenced to two years in state prison Friday for demanding that a 19-year-old woman pay her $15,000 to ward off predictions that the woman's family members would die.

Janet Adams, 41, worked as a palm reader and psychic at a booth at the annual Half Moon Bay Pumpkin Festival and got to know the victim through a friend, said San Mateo County, Calif., deputy district attorney Kathryn Alberti.

"This 19-year-old was very innocent, very vulnerable," Alberti said.

Over several months, Adams would make predictions that the woman's family members were about to die, and would tell her that she needed to pay or else it would come true, Alberti said. The victim had access to a parent's bank account, and also charged payments on her credit cards, Alberti said.

The requests for money came almost weekly until the woman got suspicious and reported Adams to police last fall, when she was arrested in San Mateo.

Adams was convicted last year of running the same scam on a San Mateo piano store owner. In that case, she operated under the name Kimberly Johnson, and managed to convince the owner to give her a total of $100,000, Alberti said.

"The defendant has this charismatic ability to make people pay her money they don't have," she said.

Adams' defense attorney, James Sutton, could not be reached for comment Friday. Alberti did not know what Adams spent the money on, but said that Sutton had mentioned in court that Adams paid for medical treatments for her sick mother.

---

© 2003, San Jose Mercury News (San Jose, Calif.).

Visit MercuryNews.com, the World Wide Web site of the Mercury News, at mercurynews.com. 

Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/8/2003 7:03:54 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
RICHARD D. MCMULLIN SENTENCED FOR OBSTRUCTION OF SEC INVESTIGATION AND LYING TO INVESTIGATORS


U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 18493 / December 8, 2003

U.S. v. Richard D. McMullin Civil Action No. 03-382 (C.D. Cal.)
RICHARD D. MCMULLIN SENTENCED FOR OBSTRUCTION OF SEC INVESTIGATION AND LYING TO INVESTIGATORS
On December 1, 2003, The Hon. Margaret M. Morrow, U.S. District Judge for the Central District of California, sentenced Richard D. McMullin, 39, to five months federal custody and five months home detention based on his guilty plea last year to conspiracy to obstruct justice during an SEC enforcement investigation of Reed E. Slatkin, making false statements to FBI and IRS agents, and making false statements under oath to a bankruptcy trustee. In addition, McMullin was ordered to pay a $4,000 fine. McMullin previously paid $1.55 million in restitution to the bankruptcy trustee.

From approximately 1986 until May 2001, Slatkin operated a massive Ponzi scheme in which he solicited more than $593 million from approximately 800 investors. In his plea agreement, McMullin admitted that when the SEC began a formal investigation of Slatkin's activities in 1999, McMullin and Slatkin conspired to obstruct the SEC's investigation. McMullin and Slatkin, among other things, lied to the SEC by minimizing McMullin's role in, and knowledge of, Slatkin's bogus investment activities. The SEC obtained a temporary restraining order and asset freeze against Slatkin on May 11, 2001, and a Judgment of Permanent Injunction on June 7, 2001. Slatkin has also been barred by the Commission from associating with any investment adviser.

On September 3, 2003, Judge Morrow sentenced Slatkin to 14 years in prison for his role in the massive Ponzi scheme. Slatkin pleaded guilty to 15 counts, including conspiracy to obstruct justice during an SEC enforcement investigation.

Additional information can be found in Litigation Release No. 16998 (May 11, 2001), No. 17033 (June 11, 2001), No. 17444 (March 27, 2002), No. 17796 (September 12, 2002), No. 17796 (October 22, 2002), No. 18107 (April 25, 2003), and No. 18323 (September 4, 2003) and Advisers Act Release No. 2006 (January 2, 2002).



sec.gov 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/9/2003 6:00:22 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
NASD censured and fined Banyan Capital Markets, LLC, of Boca Raton, Florida, its owner and President, Barry F. Goldberg, and a research analyst, Louis M. Fischler, an aggregate of $60,000 in connection with the publication of a research report on Neptune Society, Inc. NASD found that the Neptune research report, published by the firm in June 2001, was unbalanced and contained omissions of material fact. The research report projected that revenues would increase from $12 million in 2000 to more than $56 million in 2005. NASD found that the report failed to disclose the company was under a going concern qualification from its auditors and that the company had experienced a net loss in 2000 of over $8 million. The firm was censured and fined $10,000. Barry F. Goldberg was suspended and fined an additional $20,000, and Fischler, who authored the report was suspended for 45 days and fined $30,000."


FOR RELEASE:
CONTACTS:

Tuesday, December 9, 2003
Nancy A. Condon
202-728-8379
Michael Shokouhi
202-728-8304

NASD Fines and Suspends Banc of America Securities Analyst for Overstated Research Reports and Providing Advance Notice of Price Targets and Ratings

NASD Also Censures and Fines Three Other Brokerage Firms for Issuing Misleading Research Reports

Washington, DC – NASD announced today that it fined and suspended Andrew Hamerling, a former research analyst at Banc of America Securities LLC (BAS), for issuing research reports with ratings, target prices and substantive discussions that were contrary to his personal opinions. NASD found that Hamerling issued six research reports regarding four issuers - SBC Communications, Inc., Williams Communications Group, TyCom, Ltd., and Qwest Communications International Inc. that violated NASD rules.

Before issuing a September 2001 SBC report, Hamerling analyzed the company's earnings per share, concluded that the earnings did not adequately reflect the company's operating results, and prepared a draft report with that analysis. NASD found that Hamerling did not publish this negative research report because he was concerned that SBC would not attend an upcoming Banc of America Securities conference and that SBC would deny him access to information in the future. NASD found that the published September Report failed to disclose negative facts about the company as well as Hamerling's actual views in violation of NASD rules.

NASD also found that Hamerling published buy ratings for SBC with a $51 target price, while he believed the stock price would decrease and, in emails, recommended that it be shorted. For example, Hamerling responded to a hedge fund manager's inquiry, by stating:

…short SBC. May sound a bit crazy, but it [SBC] has nothing fundamentally sound going for it…"

NASD also determined that Hamerling gave advance notice of his stock ratings, price targets and substantive research to representatives of issuers that he followed. This practice furnished potentially market-sensitive information prior to public release and violated NASD's just and equitable principles rule as well as BAS' own internal policies.

NASD imposed a 9-month suspension and a $125,000 fine payable upon his reassociation with any NASD-registered firm. Details of the violations found relating to research on Williams Communications Group, TyCom, Ltd., and Qwest Communications International Inc. can be found in the Hamerling settlement document. NASD's investigation of research and supervision issues at Banc of America Securities is continuing.

NASD also announced that it took action against several other firms and individuals for violations involving misleading research reports and press releases


NASD censured and fined Axiom Capital Management, Inc., of New York and three employees an aggregate of $85,000 for publishing misleading research reports in 2001 and 2002 on Sharp Technology, Inc., American Bio Medica, Corp. and MegaPro Tools, Inc. NASD found that these research reports contained misrepresentations and omissions of material fact, exaggerated and unwarranted statements, and opinions for which there was no reasonable basis. Axiom published research reports on Sharp and American Bio Medica and failed to disclose that independent auditors had issued "going concern" opinions about the companies. NASD censured and fined the firm $50,000. NASD also fined and suspended Jeffrey S. Goldberg and David L. Jordon for their roles in preparing the reports and fines and suspended Mark D. Martino from acting in a principal capacity for failing to reasonably supervise these activities.

NASD censured and fined Banyan Capital Markets, LLC, of Boca Raton, Florida, its owner and President, Barry F. Goldberg, and a research analyst, Louis M. Fischler, an aggregate of $60,000 in connection with the publication of a research report on Neptune Society, Inc. NASD found that the Neptune research report, published by the firm in June 2001, was unbalanced and contained omissions of material fact. The research report projected that revenues would increase from $12 million in 2000 to more than $56 million in 2005. NASD found that the report failed to disclose the company was under a going concern qualification from its auditors and that the company had experienced a net loss in 2000 of over $8 million. The firm was censured and fined $10,000. Barry F. Goldberg was suspended and fined an additional $20,000, and Fischler, who authored the report was suspended for 45 days and fined $30,000.

Tejas Securities Group, Inc., of Austin, Texas, was censured and fined $35,000 for publishing misleading statements on its Web Site and posting press releases and summaries of research reports that did not disclose risks associated with the securities discussed. Tejas was also ordered to pre-file with NASD's Advertising Regulation Department, for a period of six months, all revisions to the Web Site. NASD also suspended and fined Arnold Durant, the firm's Compliance Director, for failing to reasonably supervise the firm's advertising practices.
All four cases were settled, and the respondents did not admit nor deny the allegations, but consented to the entry of findings by NASD.

"These enforcement actions are part of NASD's continuing efforts to police research analyst conflicts of interest in the wake of the global settlement reached with 10 firms in April of this year," said Mary L. Schapiro, Vice Chairman of NASD.

Investors can obtain more information and the disciplinary record of any NASD-registered broker or brokerage firm by calling NASD's BrokerCheck. NASD makes available BrokerCheck at no charge to the public. In 2002, members of the public used this service to conduct more than 2.5 million searches for existing brokers or firms and requested almost 200,000 reports in cases where disclosable information existed on a broker or firm. Investors can link directly to the program by going online to www.nasdbrokercheck.com. Investors can also continue to access this service by calling 1-800-289-9999.

NASD is the leading private-sector provider of financial regulatory services, dedicated to investor protection and market integrity through effective and efficient regulation and complementary compliance and technology-based services. NASD touches virtually every aspect of the securities business - from registering and educating all industry participants, to examining securities firms, enforcing both NASD rules and the federal securities laws, and administering the largest dispute resolution forum for investors and member firms. For more information, please visit our Web Site at www.nasd.com.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/11/2003 10:18:26 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
03-393 Illegal 'cold callers' menace Australian investors: 24 organisations black listed

Wednesday 10 December 2003


The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) today warned that illegal international 'cold callers' are renewing attempts to swindle Australian investors.

'As overseas markets have recovered, ASIC is receiving increasing public complaints about phone calls from unlicensed offshore stock brokers, often called "boiler rooms". We have added 24 new organisations to our black list of illegal cold callers', said ASIC Executive Director Consumer Protection, Mr Peter Kell.

[See below for the list, and check ASIC's full list of 100 black-listed organisations on our consumer website FIDO at www.fido.asic.gov.au/coldcallerslist]

ASIC particularly highlighted the activities of a cold calling operation called Grace Morley & Associates, which has been included on the black list.

'It appears that nearly 50 Australians have sent money to Grace Morley over the past few months. Consumers that ASIC has spoken to have told us that their funds have been lost. We are concerned that all investors may lose their money,' Mr Kell said.

'Grace Morley has mainly targeted previous cold calling victims, who may hold worthless or low value shares bought a few years ago. Grace Morley offered to swap those low value shares for shares such as Microsoft, supposedly on behalf of offshore investors who needed a tax loss. Once the investor became interested, Grace Morley asked the investor for extra money, sometimes for "fees" and sometimes for "options" to get extra shares, to close the deal', Mr Kell said.

'Once you send the money offshore to these unlicensed operators, it can be as good as lost forever'.

'Many cold calls may seem as though they come from the USA, and may use US bank accounts. In fact, the operators may be based elsewhere. Investors' funds often flow from out of the US into a maze of international bank accounts to frustrate efforts by investors and law enforcement agencies to recover the money', Mr Kell said.

In 2002 ASIC issued a major report, following previous warnings, where we estimated that at least 6000 Australians have lost at least $400 million to international cold calling investment scams. In particular, small business owners, managers and professionals were hard hit.

'Stay alert to the dangers of unsolicited overseas share offers. If you receive a call out of the blue from someone overseas offering you shares, then just hang up. Advisers must have an Australian licence to advise or deal in shares or other investments. It's illegal to offer shares or other investments without a licence, and you can check easily on ASIC's website'.

ASIC's consumer website FIDO at www.fido.asic.gov.au lists known cold callers. You can also double-check for free if the company has an Australian licence.

Watch out for these six hallmarks of cold calling investment scams:


1. A well scripted sales technique applied in a disciplined way
2. A compelling story with all the right investing jargon
3. Glossy brochures, slick websites and well produced information
4. Names that sound like respected financial institutions
5. Professional follow-up service — as long as you keep sending money
6. In some cases, referees available with Australian phone numbers (but usually the number re-routes back offshore). Sometimes investors are referred to fictitious regulatory authorities.

OVERSEAS COLD CALLER ALLEGED ADDRESS
1. Allied Sovereign Zurich Barcelona, Spain
2. Blaine & Thompson S.A Guatemala, C.A.
3. Castle Gate Trading Toronto, Canada
4. Envirocell Systems Inc Zurich, Switzerland
5. Fairchild Roth Financial Inc London UK
6. First National Financial Group Inc New York, NY, USA
7. First Trading Group (also First Euro Trading Group) New York NY USA
8. The Fujiwara Group Tokyo, Japan
9. Grace Morley & Associates New York, NY, USA
10. Helvetica Trust & Fiduciary Group Zurich, Switzerland
11. Innovative Consulting Inc Dallas, Texas, USA
12. International Currency Advisors British Virgin Is; London and Costa Rica
13. Liberty First Financial Services Barcelona Spain
14. Meridian International Trading Hong Kong, China
15. Morrison Cross Financial Investments Ltd Republic of Panama
16. Oppenheimer International London, UK
17. Pan Euro Financial SA Geneva, Switzerland
18. Powell McDougall Dublin, Ireland
19. Provident International Asset Management London, UK
20. Sterling Futures Management Ltd Singapore
21. Warren and Baker Tokyo, Japan
22. Windsor Advisory Services S.A, Barcelona, Spain
23. Windsor Limited Barcelona, Spain; also in the Bahamas
24. Wire Securities Ltd Bangkok, Thailand



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/11/2003 10:20:03 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
List of known unlicensed overseas callers Black list last updated 9 December 2003

List of names
Which companies are on the blacklist?
What if a name is not on our blacklist?
Help us stop phone scams
What you should do if you've been cheated
Why does a financial services licence matter?
Avoiding phone scams - ask the right questions
Warnings and advice from overseas regulators
More about cold calling and phone scams

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W| XYZ

Note: This list identifies both active and presently dormant organisations known to ASIC, dating from 2000 to the present. Some organisations may use a name similar to the name of a better known and reputable organisation, or falsely claim to be associated with such an organisation. If you think the company name, or the associated name sounds familiar, check you are actually dealing with a reputable company, not a disreputable one.
What if the name of a company that has contacted you is not on our list?

A
Abacus Group Co Limited
252/94 Muang Thai-Phetra Tower II
17th Floor
Rachadaphisek Rd
Huaykwang, Bangkok 10320
Thailand

Allied International Investment Limited
8 Portland Place
Pritchard Street
Bristol BS2-8RH
England, UK
Ph:(44) 870 429 4883
Fax: (44) 870 220 0041
Other offices in NY, USA and Hong Kong

Allied Pacific Ventures
Level 25
Bank of China Tower
1 Garden Road
Central Hong Kong

Allied Sovereign Zurich
Suite 701, Level 7
Via Augusta
Barcelona 08006
Spain
Ph: (34) 932385924
Fax: (34) 932385925
www.alliedsovereignzurich.com

Aragon Currency Management
4491 South State Road Seven Suite-208
Fort Lauderdale
FLORIDA USA 33314
Phone numbers:
USA & Canada: 1-800-803-0387
Australia: 1-800-836-861
New Zealand: 0800-455-0055
South Africa: 0-800-992-002

Argus Capital Limited
Postbus 59366
1040 KJ Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Ph: 31 20 301 2290
Fax: 31 20 301 2210

B
Barrington Consultants Inc
(Subsidiary of Barrington Capital Ventures Ltd)

Unit 2302-A & B West Tower,
The Philippines Stock Exchange Centre,
Exchange Road, Ortigas Centre,
Pasig City 1600, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Telephone: (632) 636-8810. Facsimile: (632) 636-8397.

Barrington Capital Ventures Ltd
Unit 2302-A & B West Tower,
The Philippines Stock Exchange Centre,
Exchange Road, Ortigas Centre,
Pasig City 1600, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Telephone: (632) 636-8810. Facsimile: (632) 636-8397

Benson Dupont International
also see Suspected cold callers raided in Bangkok

Level 23, CP Tower
313 Silom Road
Bangkok 10500, Thailand
Other offices or mail addresses in Hong Kong, Japan, United Arab Emirates, Panama, France and Switzerland.

Berchmans Lee Company Inc
1410 Herrera Tower
Herrera St
Makati City, 1227 Philippines
Other offices or mail addresses in Singapore, The Bahamas and USA.

Berline Overseas Corporation
282 New York Avenue
Huntington, New York 11743
USA
Ph: (1) 631 427 5257
Fax: (1) 631 673 5926

Berkeley Samson International 23rd Floor, M Thai Tower
All Seasons Place
87 Wireless Rd
Bangkok, Thailand HSBC Tower, Level 21
101 Yincheng East Road,
Pudong, Shanghai
200120 , China
Ph: 8621 2890 3119
Fax: 8621 2890 3131

Other offices or mail addresses in HK, Singapore and Malaysia.

Bernstein & Zeiglier
10 Anson Road
#18-18 International Plaza
Singapore 079903
Ph: (65) 6223 3474
Fax: (65) 6227 5729

Blaine & Thompson S.A
Edificio Topacio Azul
Numero 217 Nivel 2
2a Avenida 13, Calle 2-60, Zona 10
Guatemala, C.A.
Ph: (502) 332 8859/8860
Fax: (502) 332 8863/363 0378
www.blaine-thompson.com

Bradford-Kempner Investments Ltd
(Reportedly taken over by Crawford Peale, Inc)

Unit 1512, 15th Floor
Q-House Asoke Building
66 Sukhumvit 21 Road, Klongtoey Nua,
Wattana Bangkok, 10110,
Thailand.
Telephone: (662) 264-2592 / 2593.
Facsimile: (662) 264-2594 / 2146 Atrium, Stravinskylaan 305,
1077 ZX, Amsterdam,
The Netherlands. Unit 8111 Medical Plaza,
Amorsolo coner dela Rosa Streets,
Legaspi Village,
Makati City,
Philippines.
Telephone: (632) 8101366.

Breakthrough Venture Partners
3460E Dover Street
Mesa Arizona 85213
USA
Ph: (1) 602 220 1324
Fax: (1) 206 666 3086

The Brinton Group
also see Suspected cold callers raided in Bangkok

Liberty Square
287 Silom Road
Bangrak, 10500
Bangkok, Thailand Park West Building
6-12-1 Nishi-Shinjuku
Shinjuku-ku
Tokyo 160-0023, Japan

Other offices or mail addresses in China.

Brooks Pearson Investment Limited
PO Box 1125
Silom Post Office
Bangkok 10504
Thailand

C
C&C Global Co Limited/Commodity and Currency Global Co Limited
17th Floor, UBC 11 Building
Soi Sukhumvit Road 33
North Klongton, Wattana
Bangkok, 10110 Thailand

Capital Advisory Corporation
Silom Complex,
18th Floor, 191 Silom Rd.
Bangkok 10500, Thailand
Other offices or mail addresses in Hong Kong and British Virgin Islands.

Capital Assets Limited
(part of The Capital Group Investment Advisors & Consultants Inc)

28th floor, Tower 2
The Enterprise Center
6766 Ayala Avenue corner Paseo de Roxas
Makati City
Metro Manila
Philippines Taipei Metro Building
Suite D, 11th Floor
207 Tun Hwa S. Road
Sec. 2, Taipei
Taiwan Provenza No. 288
Principal 08008 Barcelona,
Spain

Castle Gate Trading
161 Bay Street
27th Floor
Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2S1
Canada
Ph: (1) (416) 352 5989
Fax: (1) (416) 352 5989

Clanvale Securities, S.A.
Edificio Torre America
Floor 3, Office 307
Avenida Venezuela
Bello Monte
Caracas
Venezuela
Ph: 58 212 762 4663 or 761 2498
Fax: 58 212 763 6675

Cogan Davis & Associates
(Informed name changed to Greer Fox Yamato)
Level 11, Park West Building,
6-12 Nishi-Shinjuku Tokyo,
160-0023 Japan

Cohen & Nesbit Group Ltd
Level 19 Hong Leong Building
16 Raffles Quay
Singapore
Tel: 65 321 9118
Fax: 65 321 9116

Collwood & Hall, Ltd
23rd Floor, M. Thai Tower
All Seasons Place
87 Wireless Road
Phatumwan
Bangkok, 10330, Thailand

Commodity and Currency Global Co Limited
See C&C Global Co Limited

Crawford Peale, Inc
(Reported to have taken over Sherman Brothers, Vantage International and Bradford-Kempner Investments Ltd)

Unit 1609, 16th Flr, Vanit 1 Building
1126/1 New Petchburi Road
Bangkok 10400 Thailand
Ph: 662 655 2322/2323
Fax: 662 655 2324/2325

The Ramsay Building,
P.O. Box N-9794
Nassau Bahamas
D
Dreyfus Securities Ltd
23rd Floor, M Thai Tower
87 Wireless Rd
Phatumwan,
Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Other offices or mail addresses in Japan, Brazil and London.

Duke's & Company Securities Inc
Information suggests were taken over by Muller & Sons and World Wide Investors Management Inc.

Unit 1009 PS Bank Tower,
Senator Gil J. Puyat Ave.,
Makati City, 1220, Philippines
Other offices or mail addresses in Hong Kong, Belize and Canada.

Dunhill Capital
Bahnhofstrasse 71
Zurich CH-8023
Switzerland
Ph: (41) 1 217 3561
Fax: (41) 1 217 3562

E
E Go Trade
also see Suspected cold callers raided in Bangkok Otemachi First Square
East Tower 4/F
1-5-1 Otechachi, Chiyoda-Ku
Tokyo 100-0004
Japan 31/F Jin Mao Tower
Pudong, Shanghai 200120
China

Envirocell Systems Inc
The World Trade Center
Leutschenbachstrasse 95
Zurich 8050
Switzerland

Evergreen Consulting Corporation
5th Floor Amrit Tower,
4980 P. Guanzon Street,
Makati City, Philippines.
Telephone: (632) 899-3591.
Facsimile: (632) 899-3590.

F
Fairchild Roth Financial Inc
Gallery Four
12 Leadenhall St.
London UK EC3V 1LP
www.frfin.com

Fidelity Corporate Services
Aeschenvorstadt 71
CH 4051 Basle Switzerland
Ph. 41 61 225 42 32
Fax: 41 61 225 42 33

First Atlantic Corporation
Boca Raton
Florida
USA
Ph: (1) 561 697 0232
Fax; (1) 561 558 0495

First Chartered Capital Client Service Centre
14th Floor IBM Tower
Pacific Century Place
2A Workers Road North
Beijing, 100027
China
Ph: 86 10 6539 1024
Fax: 86 10 6539 1060

First Euro Trading Group
(See First Trading Group) ISM Tower, 14th Floor
2A Workers Road North
Beijing China 100027
Ph: (8610) 6539 1024
Fax: (8610) 1014/1050 Institutional Market Division
245 Park Avenue
24th and 39th Floors
Manhattan, New York
USA 10167
First Federal Capital C/o 1900 Ave of The Stars
Suite 1635
Los Angeles, CA 90067, USA 72 New Bond Street, London W1Y9DD
United Kingdom
Ph: 44 171 493 2880
Fax: 44 171 499 3417

First National Financial Group Inc
46th Floor, 140 Broadway
New York, NY 10005
USA
Fax: (1) 212 858 7522

First Independent Capital Resources Inc
Shiroyuma JT Movi Building,
8-1 Toranomon 4 Chome
Minato-Ku, Tokyo 105
Japan
Ph: (81) 345 124 360
Fax: (81) 345 124 361

First Trading Group
(also known as First Euro Trading Group)
445 W. 45th Street
New York NY 10036
USA
Ph: (1) (212) 201 1326/903 4187
Fax: (1) (917) 591 3024/(212) 468 2831
www.firsttradinggroup.com

FL Lober Tax Consultants
P.O Box 259
Nassau Bahamas
125 N.E. 15th Street
Niarni 33319

Foreign Currency International
27 Suhumvit Soi 20,
Bangkok, 10110 Thailand

Foreign Trade International
12th Floor, 253 Sukhumvit SOI 21
Asoke Road
Bangkok 10110
Thailand

Fortune International Inc 18th Floor
One International
Finance Centre
1 Harbour View St
Central, Hong Kong 2111 Wing On House
71 Des Voeux Road
Central, Hong Kong

Other offices or mail addresses in Singapore, Japan and China.

Freelander & Kuhn 1411 Herrera Tower
Herrar Street,
Salcedo Village
Makati City
Philippines Nervis Street
PO Box 767
St Johns
Antigua
West Indies

Return mailing address in Singapore

The Fujiwara Group
14F Kamiyacho MT Building
4-3-20, Toranomon
Minato-ku
Tokyo 105-0001
Japan
Ph: (813) 5404 3458
Fax: (813) 4512 3022/5404 3401
www.fujiwaragroup.com

G
Gaylord & Finch 21200 Broadway East 74
Seattle
Washington, 98122
USA 400 Broadway
Seattle
Washington, 98122
USA
Ph: 1 206 888 0329
Fax: 1 206 339 2813
General Commerce Bank AG/
General Commerce Bank of Vienna
Schlickgasse 1,
A-1090 Wien, Austria.
Telephone: 43-1-317-27-00. Facsimile: 43-1-317-27-00-73.

The Georgian Group
(Took over Hudson International Group Limited)

Level 21, HSBC Tower
101 Yin Chen East Road
Pudong, Shanghai
200120 P. R. China

Has offices in Indonesia, Malaysia and Japan.

Gerson-Lehmann Inc
SSP Tower 3, Unit 14B, 14th Floor,
88 Silom Road, Suriyawongse,
Bangrak, Bangkok 10500, Thailand.
Telephone: (662) 634 - 1823 / 1824.
Facsimile: (662) 634 1825

Gibson Petersen Company Limited
(Information suggests Gibson Petersen has taken over United Capital Management Inc client accounts)

Unit B, 12C Floor
Sino-Thai Tower
32/33 Sukhumvit 21 Road
Klongtoey Nua
Wattana, Bangkok
Thailand

Global Asset Partners Ltd
West Bay Street, Beaumont House
2nd Floor
PO Box CB-13531
Nassau
Bahamas

Global Interactive Level 36, Hong Leong Building,
16 Raffles Quay, Singapore.
Telephone: 65 321 9149.
Facsimile: 65 322 8558 Level 25 Bank of China Tower,
1 Garden Road,
Central Hong Kong.
Telephone: 852 2251 1623.
Facsimile: 852 2251 1618. 3753 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 200
Las Vegas. Nevada 89109, USA
Telephone: 702 892 3915.
Facsimile: 702 892 3916

Global Option Trading Co Ltd
14th Floor,
253 Sukhumvit Soi 21
Asoke Road
Bangkok 10110
Thailand

Global-Shopping.Net, Inc 2500 East Hallandale Beach Blvd
Suite 604
Hallandale, Florida 33009
USA Level 36 Hong Leong Building
16 Raffles Quay
Singapore Level 25 Bank of China Tower
1 Garden Road
Central Hong Kong
Hong Kong

Goldberg & Partners Inc
28th Floor, Tower 2
The Enterprise Center
6766 Ayala Ave Cor. Paseo de Roxas
Makati City
Philippines

Grace Morley & Associates
557 Madison Avenue
New York NY 10002
USA
Ph: (1) 212 937 3505
Fax: (1) 212 658 9177
www.gracemorley.com

Greer Fox Yamato
(Informed name changed from Cogan Davis & Associates)
Level 9 Edobori Bldg
2-1-1 Edobori
Nishi-Ku Osaka 550 0002
Japan
Ph: (81) 6 6225 1307
Fax: (816 6225 1274

H
Hamilton & Associates
Bahnhofstrasse 52
Ch-8001 Zurich
Switzerland
Ph: (41) 1 214 68 46
Fax: (41) 1 214 65 19

Helvetica Trust & Fiduciary Group
Bahnhofstrasse 71
Zurich 8001
Switzerland
Ph: (41) 1 217 3527
Fax: (41) 1 217 3529

Hudson International
(Taken over by The Georgian Group)

Hudson International
Q-House Building 12F
Convent Rd Silom
Bankgok 10500 Thailand Level 43, Wisma 46-Kota BNI
Jl. Jenderal Sudirman Kav. 28
Jakarta 12920


I
Innovative Consulting Inc
13140 Coit Road Ste 219
Dallas Texas 75240-5790
USA
Ph: 1 888 830 8004
www.innovativeconsultingusa.com

International Asset Management
Also see Suspected cold callers raided in Bangkok

Level 24, Bangkok City Tower
79 Southorn Road,
Khwaeng Thungahamek,
Khet Sathorn
Bangkok, 10120, Thailand Level 23, CP Tower,
Silom Road, Silom
Bangkok, 10500 Thailand Park West Building
6-12-1 Nishi-Shinjuku
Shinjuku, Tokyo
160-0023 Japan
Level 25, Bank of China Tower,
1 Garden Road,
Central Hong Kong Level 36, Hong Leong Building,
16 Raffles Quay,
Singapore 048581

International Currency Advisors Anderson Square Building
George Town, Grand Cayman
Cayman Islands
British Virgin Islands
Ph: (1) (345) 948 7034
Fax: (1) (345) 948 7034 Crown House 72 Hammersmith Road
London, England W14 8TH
UK
Ph: (44) 20 7470 2404
Fax: (44) 20 7470 2400 Oficentro Ejecutivo La Sabana
Tower 1, 4th Floor
San Jose, Costa Rica
Ph: (506) 231 4046
Fax: (506) 290 3648

International Currency Group
18377 Beach Blvd, Suite 211
Huntington Beach CA 92648
United States of America

International Exchanges Group
Kenny Hilund
Suite 502, Villa Thavin Court,
52 Sukhumviy Sol 23,
Klong Toey, Bangkok 10110, Thailand

Investment Advisors & Consultants Ltd
The Exchange Tower
130 King Street
West Suite 2500
Toronto, Ontario
Canada

ISS International Marketing Co Ltd
173/12-14 M 6, Nongprue
Banglamung, Chonburi 20260
THAILAND
Ph: (663) 873 1804
Fax: (663) 873 1815

J
Jacobs & Kiplinger
Zurich World Trade Centre
Leutchenbachstrasse 95
8050 Zurich
Switzerland
Ph: 411 308 3970
Fax: 411 308 3500

JF Kidwell Limited
Transferred business to Phoenix International Limited
Gedung Menara Era
9th Floor, Komp.
Oasis Mitra Sarana
JL. Senen Raya Kav 1350137
Jarkarta, 10410, Indonesia

J R Matthey
International Bank Plaza
2348 Chemin Lucerne Road #153
Montreal Quebec
Canada H3R 238

K
Kearns Investments Inc
(Other offices in China and Malaysia)
Level 9 AIG Building
1-1-3 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku
Tokyo 100-0005
Japan

The Kensington Group 23F M Thai Tower
All Seasons Place
87 Wireless Rd
Phatumwan
Bangkok 10330, Thailand 18F One International
Finance Centre
1 Harbour View St.
Central, Hong Kong

Other offices or mail addresses in Singapore, Japan and China.

KLM Investment Services Limited
Cannon Bridge
25 Dowgate Hill
London, EC4R 2GN
United Kingdom
Ph/Fax: (44) 207 504 3759


Knowle Sachs & Company Inc
Information suggests were taken over by Dukes & Company Securities Ltd.

C/- Suite 17, 21 Herrera Street
Coner Valero
Salcedo Village
Makati, Metro Manila
Philippines
Other offices or mail addresses in Hong Kong, Cayman Islands and Switzerland.

L
Liberty First Financial Services, Inc
Liberty First Foreign Services, Inc
Liberty First Advisory Services, SA
Paris 101 – 107, 5º1ª
Barcelona 08029
Spain
Ph: 34 93 493 5000
Fax: 34 93 493 5002
www.libertyfirst.net

Lincoln Financial Group
23F, 105 Tun Hwa South Road Section Two,
Taipei 106 Taiwan, R.O.C.
Tel: 886 2 2784 1600
Fax: 886 2 2784 1602

M
The Madison Group
23rd Floor, M Thai Tower
All Seasons Place
87 Wireless Rd
Bangkok, Thailand

Marlborough Acquisitions Inc
(USA based) Calls investors who have dealt with overseas cold calling firms and offers to buy their shares at a higher price - but require payment of an upfront fee.

4600 South Ulster Street, Denver,
Colorado, 80237 - 2882 USA.
Telephone: +1 (303) 370 9056.
Facsimile: +1 (303) 370 9056.

Meridian International Trading
27-F Tower 2
16 Harcourt Road
Central Hong Kong
Ph: (852) 2918 8714
Fax: (852) 2900 1077

Millenium Financial Group
23rd Floor, Tower 1, The Enterprise Centre
6766 Ayala Avenue
Makati City 1200
Philippines

Morgan International Investment Group Inc 6 Circuit De La Foire Internationale BP 2507 L-1025
Luxembourg
Ph: (352) 264-20-296
Fax: (352) 264-20-664 23, Square Edouard VII,
75000, Paris,
France
Ph: (33) 1 5343 9237
Fax: (33) 1 5343 9292
www.morganinternational.org

Morgan Pacific Capital Inc
138 Silom Road
10th Floor, Boonmitr Building
Bangkok 10500
Thailand

Morrison Cross Financial Investments Ltd
Ave Balboa – Bay Mall Suite 201
PO Box 0833-0118
Plaza Credicorp
Republic of Panama
Ph: (507) 265 1179
Fax: (507) 265 8069
www.morrisoncrossfinancial.com

Muller & Sons Securities Management Inc
Information suggests were taken over by Price Warner Company Ltd.

Unit 114, Prince Plaza I
106 Legaspi Street
Legaspi Village
Makati City, Philippines
Other office or mail address in Belize.

N
Newport Pacific Securities & Management Inc
Information suggests were taken over by Gibson & Peterson Company Ltd.

Unit 404 Green Belt Mansion
106 Perea St
Legaspi Village
Makati City
Philippines

Norwich Asset Management (UK) Ltd
1903-B West Tower
Philippine Stock Exchange Center
Exchange Road, Ortigas Center
Pasig City, Metro Manilla
Philippines
Tel: 632 687 5028
Fax: 632 631 4858

O
Oppenheimer International
4 Royal Mint Court
London EC3N 4HJ
UK
Ph: (44) 20 797 77726
Fax: (44) 20 797 77727
www.oppenheimerinternational.com

Optimum Resources International Limited
25 Westbourne Grove
London
United Kingdom

Claims to have offices in New York and Tokyo

Uses transfer agent:
First Independent Resources Capital Limited (Incorporated in Antigua)
58 Queensway, Suite 17,
London
England, W2 3RW
United Kingdom

Osiris Asia Pacific
also see Suspected cold callers raided in Bangkok

Level 23, CP Tower
313 Silom Road
Bangrak,
Bangkok 10500, Thailand
Other offices or mail addresses in Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia and Germany.

P
Pan Euro Financial SA
10, Cours de Rive
CP3237-CH 1211 Geneva,
Switzerland
Tel: (41) 22 747 7920
Fax: (41) 22 747 7923
www.paneurofinancial.com

Petro Technologies Ltd
4F, Section 1, Tunhuna South Road
Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
Ph: 886 2 2577 3165
Fax: 886 2 2577 4157


Pfeiffer Galland Limited
Plaza Mashill Level 21
Jl. Jendral Sudirman Kav. 25
Jakata 12920, Indonesia

Phoenix International Limited
7B President Tower 971,
973 Ploenchit Road,
Kwaeng Lumpini,
Khet Pathumwan,
Bangkok, 10330,
Thailand

Polaris Venture Partners
31st Floor
Jin Mao Tower
88 Shi JI Avenue
Pudong Shanghai 200120
China
Ph: 86 21 2890 9098
Fax: 86 21 2890 9140
Email: info@polarisventure.com
www.polarisventure.com

Powell McDougall
Harcourt Centre
Harcourt Road
Dublin
Ireland

Price Warner Company Ltd
(Based in British Virgin Islands) Information suggests that Price Warner took over the operation of Muller and Sons, which took over Dukes & Company Securities Inc, which took over Knowles Sachs & Company Inc.

8th Floor,
Udom Vidhva Building,
956 Rama IV Road,
Silom Bangrak,
Bangkok 10500,
Thailand.
Telephone: (662) 636 2780/81.
Facsimile: (662) 636 2782/83. IFS Chambers,
Road Town,
Tortola, BVI.

Provident International Asset Management
Lexham Services Center
Lexham Gardens
London W6 8JQ
UK
Ph: (44) 20 8485 8180
Fax: (44) 20 8485 8182
www.providentuk.com

Pryce Weston Incorporated
Manila Business Center
Suite 1721 Herrera Tower
Herrera St.
Salcedo Village,
Makati City 1200, Philippines
Other offices or mail addresses in Hong Kong, British Virgin Islands and US.

PT. Dolok Permai
6F Pacific Star Building
Makati Avenue
Makati City
Philippines

R
Royce Sanford
(Took over from Trident International)
Unit 12A05, 12A Floor,
Chartered Square Building
152 North Sathorn Road, Bangrak,
Bangkok 10500, Thailand

Rutherford Consultants
Place Du Bourg-De-Four
1204 Geneva
Switzerland
Ph: (41) 22 819 9601
Fax: (41) 22 819 96 04

S
Safe Harbour, Ltd
28/F Plaza, 222 Huai Hai Zhong Road
Shanghai 200021
P.R. China
Ph: (8621) 5383 3000
Fax: (8621) 5382 3218

Saxon & Swift
Suite 7/A, Cypress Gardens
Herrera Street
Legaspi Village
Makati City 1200 Philippines
Other offices or mail addresses in Hong Kong, Vanuatu and US.

Sherman Brothers
Information suggests were taken over by Crawford Peale and/or Brooks Pearson Investment Ltd.
Level 23, M Thai Tower
All Seasons Place
87 Wireless Road
Phatumwan Bangkok
Thailand

Sigama Capital Management
also see Suspected cold callers raided in Bangkok
Level 18F
One International Finance Centre
1 Harbour View Street
Central
Hong Kong Level 14
Kamiyacho Mori Building
4-3-20 Toranomon
Minato-ku
Tokyo 105-0001 140 One Pacific Place
Level 14/1401 Sukhumvit Road
Bangkok 10110
Thailand
Level 24
Bangkok City Tower
79 Southorn Road
Khwaeng Thungahamek
Khet Sathorn Bangkok 10120, Thailand

Smith & Henderson Associates Inc
Level 21
HSBC Tower
101 Yin Cheng East Road
Pudong
Shanghai 200120
China
Ph: 8621 2890 3167

Stamford Financial Limited
Level 14, Hibiya Central Building
1-2-9 Nishi Shimbashi Minato-Ku
Tokyo, Japan
Ph: 813 5532 7235
Fax: 813 5532 7373

Sterling Futures Management Ltd
#06-01 The Octagon
105 Cecil Street
Singapore 69534
Singapore
Ph: 65 68279701
Fax: 65 68279601

Stillman Roth
Information suggests associated with: Gaylord & Finch
1711 Broadway
Seattle Washington
USA 98122-2415
Ph: 1 866 215 9788
Fax: 1 866 841 9136 ext 6220

The Stockard Group
Suite 400, 33940 Olympic Boulevard
Erlanger, Kentucky 41018
USA
Ph: 1 (859) 372 6612
Fax: 1 (859) 372 6613

The Strategic Alliance Group
Also see Suspected cold callers raided in Bangkok

17th Floor, BC Sethiwan Tower
139 Pan Road
Silom, Bangruk
Bangkok 10500, Thailand 23rd Floor, M Thai Tower
All Seasons Place
87 Wireless Road
Phatumwan
Bangkok 10330, Thailand

Other offices or mail addresses in Hong Kong, New Zealand and Switzerland.

T
Taylor Atlantic Ltd 4th Floor 124 Victoria Street
London SW1 E 5LA
United Kingdom Level 40 Tower 2
Petronas Twin Towers
Kuala Lumpur 50088
Malaysia


Transglobal Consultants Limited
(Allegedly ceased operating in Indonesia on 24 August 2001)


Pacific Place Two Building
Suite 1707, 17th Floor
142 Sukhumvit Road, Klongtoey
Bangkok 10110, Thailand
Also addresses in Hong Kong and London. Wisma Bank Dharmala
19th fl, Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav.28,
Jakata 12920 Indonesia


Trident International
(Took over Worldwide Investors Management Inc, see later details)

Suite 2207, 88 Corporate Center
141 Valero Street, Salcedo Village
Makati City, 1200
Philippines
Return mailing address in Singapore

Tri-West Invest Club
160 North Front Street,
PO Box 354,
Belize City, Belize

U
United Capital Management Inc
(Information suggests Gibson Petersen has taken over United Capital Management Inc client accounts)
1680 Ramon Magsaysay Center
Roxas Boulevard
Manila, Philippines
Other offices or mail addresses Hong Kong, London and US

US Trading Associates Co Ltd
14th Floor,
253 Soi Sukhumvit 21
Bangkok 10110
Thailand.
Ph. (662)204 0900
Fax. (662)204 0880/0881

V
Vantage International Management Inc
(Information suggests taken over by Crawford Peale, Inc)

Level 23,
M Thai Tower
All Seasons Place
87 Wireless Road
Phatumwan Bangkok
Thailand Times Square Building, 12th Floor
Unit 12-04B, 246 Sukhumvit Rd
Klongtoey,
Bangkok, Thailand Unico House Building
Room 15-G
15th Floor, 29/1 Soi Langsuan Ploenchit Rd
Patumwan
Bangkok 10330, Thailand


Other offices or mail addresses in Singapore.

W
Warren and Baker
Otemachi First Square East Tower 4F
1-5-1 Otemachi
Chiyoda-ku
Tokyo 100-0004
Japan
Ph: (81) 3 5219 1531
Fax: (81) 3 5219 1201
www:warrenandbaker.com

#Wellington International
See also Thai SEC release "SEC Thailand Filed Criminal Complaint against 5 Individuals for Conducting Unlicensed Securities Businesses under the Name of the Wellington International"
140 One Pacific Place
Suite 1401, Level 14
Sukhumvit Rd
Bangkok, 10110 Thailand
Tel 662-653-5010
Fax 662-653-5129

#Please note that this company is not connected in any way and should not be confused with Wellington International Management Company Pte Ltd of Level 61, MLC Centre, 19-29 Martin Place, Sydney, NSW which is a registered securities dealer (ASIC licence number 187915), nor with its parent company Wellington Management Company, LLP.

Western and Gulf Finance Corporation
28F Soundwill Plaza
38 Russel Street
Causeway Bay
Hong Kong
Ph: 852 9457 1953
Fax: 852 3104 7705

Westwood Management Limited Suite 1214 Medical Plaza
Dela Rosa corner Amorsolo Streets
Legaspi Village
Makati City
Philippines Room No 14F, 14th Floor
Vanissa Building, 29 Soi Chidlom
Ploenchit Road, Lumpini
Pathumwan
Bangkok 10330
Thailand

Windsor Advisory Services S.A.
(Subsidiary of either Windsor Investment Ltd or Windsor Ltd)
Adva. Diagonal 477,
Planta 21 (Torre Barcelona)
08036 Barcelona
Spain
Ph: 34 93 366 8000
Fax: 34 93 366 8004
www.windsoradv.com

Windsor Limited
(Holding company of Windsor Advisory Services, S.A.)
Avenida Diagonal
477, 20a-08036
(or Floor 21)
Barcelona
SPAIN
Ph: (34) 93 366 8000
Fax: (34) 93 366 8004
www.windsoradv.com

Other office in the Bahamas

Windsor Venture Securities Co Limited
Level 36, Hong Leong Bldg.
16 Raffles Quay
Singapore 048581

Wire Securities Ltd
246 Times Square Bldg
#26-01 Sukhumvit Rd
Klongtoey
Bangkok 10110
Thailand
Ph: 662 229 4634
Fax: 662 253 5979

Worldleader Investment Insider/Worldleader Investment Ltd
11th Floor Dah Sing Life Building
99 Des Voeux Road
Central
Hong Kong Suite 1217 Cityland 12 Tower
1 H V Dela Costa Street
Salcedo Village
Philippines
Ph: 632 840 3939
28f Tower 2, The Enterprise Centre
6766 Ayala AVENUE COR.
Paseo de Roxas Makati City, Philippines 1200
Ph: 632 8403939
Fax: 632 8403942 Pasea Estate P.O.Box 3149
Road Town, Tortola
British Virgin Islands
Ph: 284 4948308
Fax: 284 4943654


Worldwide Investment Management Corporation
Various office or mail address in the Philippines.

Worldwide Investors Management Inc
(Taken over by Trident International)

Suite 305 Valero Plaza
124 Valero Street, Salcedo Village
Makati City, 1227
Philippines


More information about cold calling and phone scams





Updated: 11/12/2003





Warnings
Seminars
Cold calling & phone scams
Scams & swindlers
Pie In The Sky Award
Rates of return & risk

Resources
Calculators
How to complain
Financial literacy
FIDO News
Publications
Indigenous


Codes of practice
Useful links

About this site
Site map
Definition of terms
Hints for using this site
Copyright & linking to our website



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/11/2003 2:39:36 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
ATEL 1-89 reverse split effective 12/12/2003 New symbol (ACST)



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/11/2003 3:03:19 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
New Tel 'insider scam' By Geoff Elliott December 12, 2003

A FORMER employee of collapsed telecommunications company New Tel, who is willing to admit to insider trading of New Tel shares and name others who participated in the alleged scam, has criticised the corporate regulator for not showing any interest.

In what appears to be a ready-made case for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, the employee has shown The Australian documents that indicate dubious trading in New Tel.

The employee was hopeful that a deal offering immunity from prosecution could be struck, but investigators from ASIC have made no attempt to make contact after the employee was forced to cancel a meeting around June this year.

"They have my phone number but have never called me back. I had to cancel the meeting because of work but you would think they might be able to arrange a meeting out of work hours," the employee said.

She said trading New Tel shares "was money for jam". She added she also tipped her sister off on New Tel shares and "she got a new kitchen out of it".

The employee said her desire to be a whistleblower stemmed from her frustration that nothing had been done to initiate a prosecution over New Tel's controversial demise.

She said she made two trades in New Tel shares in the 2000-01 financial year, spending about $5000 each time. On both occasions she said she was told to do so by a senior executive who had tipped her off to forthcoming announcements or developments at the company. She said she made a tidy profit of a couple of thousand dollars.

While the two trades were relatively small, at the end of the financial year the employee was shocked to receive statements from her broker that she had traded "hundreds of thousands of dollars" of New Tel shares. She said the broker sent her a fax at the end of the financial year claiming she had made a profit of $36,000 on New Tel shares but she said she never saw any of the money and did not know what he was talking about.

"My first thought was that I would have to declare that to the taxman but I didn't have the money," she said. "My accountant found it hard to believe but I could prove I had never received that sum of money."

The employee said she believed the trades in her name were on behalf of other executives at New Tel.

New Tel, whose chief executive was Perth-based Peter Malone, was placed into administration a year ago, after raising more than $100 million from shareholders during the dotcom and telco boom. Creditors are owed about $40 million.

The Australian has also been told that there was blatant price support of New Tel shares.

Despite many employees telling The Australian that they were interviewed by ASIC last year, ASIC remains mute on the company's collapse. A spokeswoman for ASIC yesterday refused to confirm or deny it was investigating New Tel's collapse.

This week liquidator to New Tel, Phil Carter from PricewaterhouseCoopers, said he was planning litigation against former directors of New Tel for allegedly allowing the company to trade while insolvent.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/12/2003 2:14:53 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
ROBERT POZNER BARRED FROM ASSOCIATION WITH A BROKER-DEALER

On December 11, the Commission issued an Order Instituting
Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions
against Robert H. Pozner. The Commission simultaneously accepted
Pozner's offer of settlement, in which he agreed to be barred from
association with any broker or dealer.

The Order finds that from at least July through October 2000, Pozner was
a registered representative, trader and market maker associated with a
registered broker-dealer called Glenn Michael Financial, Inc., at its
offices in Hackensack, New Jersey. On Sept. 30, 2002, the Commission
filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah,
in an action captioned Securities and Exchange Commission v. Allen
Wolfson, et al., Civil Action Number 2:02 CV 1086, alleging that Pozner
and one or more of his co-defendants, in order to artificially increase
the stock price of Freedom Surf securities, advanced the bid price
without relation to genuine market demand or worth of the company. In
that action, Pozner was enjoined, by consent, for violations of Section
17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act
and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. (Rel. 34-48907; File No. 3-11354)



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/12/2003 5:36:58 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
2DoTrade Inc->Delray Beach Lawyer Admits Fraud

POSTED: 9:38 PM EST December 11, 2003

WASHINGTON -- A Delray Beach lawyer pleaded guilty Thursday to charges he participated in a scheme to boost the stock of a company that falsely claimed it had a product to kill anthrax.

Lewis Van Stillman, 55, pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court in Washington to conspiracy and securities fraud charges. Stillman was among several people indicted on charges they pumped up the price of a company called 2DoTrade Inc. by aggressively distributing misleading press releases and spam e-mails.

The indictment said the company falsely claimed it had contracts for goods and commodities worth more than $300 million. After the October 2001 anthrax attacks, the company claimed it had an anti-anthrax product. Copyright 2003 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/12/2003 8:11:14 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
SEC Freezes Assets of Alleged Hedge Fund, Hot Dog Schemer

By Paul Barr, Senior Reporter

Friday, December 12, 2003


BOSTON (HedgeWorld.com)—The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a preliminary injunction that froze the assets of a New Hampshire man accused of fraud involving a hedge fund and a hot dog business.

The injunction had been requested in November when the SEC filed a complaint in U.S. District Court for New Hampshire. As a result, the assets of both Koji Goto and Shaleen Cassily, Mr. Goto’s wife, were frozen. (Mr. Goto allegedly transferred ownership of his house into the Ms. Cassily’s name.)

The SEC accused Mr. Goto of misappropriating a total of US$5 million between the two alleged schemes. Mr. Goto fraudulently raised money for a now-defunct Boston hedge fund, Epic Investment Partners LP, according to the SEC. Though he actually was asked informally to raise money for the fund, he was doing so after he misstated his work qualifications to the Epic fund managers, one of which was a distant relative, the SEC complaint states.

Among the false statements he allegedly made in order to collect funds for investment in the Epic fund: that he had previously managed a portfolio totaling between US$250 million and US$300 million while employed in the private client group at John Hancock; that he would personally invest between US$6 million and US$7 million in Epic; that he was authorized to collect investments for the fund; that multiple investors had placed between US$10 million and US$20 million into the fund; and that the fund was profitable.

Mr. Goto at one time was employed by subsidiaries of the John Hancock Financial Services Co. and Hancock-related insurance agencies as both a registered representative and licensed insurance broker but had been terminated and was never employed by a Hancock investment adviser, according to the SEC complaint.

Moreover, the SEC says he was raising money for Epic even after the firm had decided to shut down, following poor performance. He raised about US$4.8 million from at least 10 people with the purpose of investing in Epic, and none of it was ever put into the fund, according to the SEC complaint.

Among the ways he spent the ill-gotten money, according to the complaint: US$100,000 was paid to the Bellagio Casino in Las Vegas; US$1.4 million was transferred to a personal brokerage account in Ms. Cassily’s name; and cash withdrawals totaling more than US$700,000 were made.

Home Depot Hot Dogs

Mr. Goto’s other alleged scheme entailed the adoption of the business plan of an actual company, Coyote Dogs, the complaint states. He raised US$375,000 falsely telling investors that he had an exclusive license to sell hot dogs at Home Depot, it says.

“Without the knowledge of the legitimate Coyote Dogs company, Goto created a business plan, copied extensively from Coyote Dogs's legitimate business plan and created securities offering documents for a purported New Hampshire limited liability company that Goto also called Coyote Dogs,” the SEC statement says
.


PBarr@HedgeWorld.com



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/12/2003 8:24:38 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Men sent to prison for Internet scam

A judge gives long sentences for a pair passing off junk as overstock from large stores

12/09/03


Two men who used the Internet to peddle junk merchandise they claimed was perfectly good were sentenced Monday to lengthy federal prison terms.


U.S. District Judge Garr King sentenced Ethan J. Platteborze and Kenneth S. Kluss for scamming small retailers. Both men pleaded guilty earlier this year to federal conspiracy and fraud charges.

Platteborze was sentenced to almost four years and Kluss was sentenced to nearly three years. Together they must pay back about $388,000.

The two men were accused in the summer of 2002 of fraudulently selling big-box overstock to about 100 mom-and-pop stores all over the nation from December 1999 to February 2002.

On their Web site, they claimed Oregon-based Cavalier Salvage was a nationwide company with 27 warehouses and a fleet of trucks that moved "Grade-A merchandise" from stores such as Sears, Kmart and Costco.

The FBI discovered that the men were running a scam out of apartments in Tualatin, Tigard, Wilsonville and Las Vegas, Nev. They owned no trucks or warehouses, and the merchandise they were selling was junk that had been damaged in shipment or returned broken by customers.

Customers who called up the Cavalier Salvage Web site saw photos of huge warehouses stocked with goods for sale. The real owners of the warehouses -- City Liquidators, a large warehouse store in Southeast Portland, and the Chrysler Parts Distribution Center in Beaverton -- didn't know the photos were being used on the Web site. The FBI shut down the site in February 2001.

Both men apologized for their crimes. King denied requests by both men for lighter sentences, calling it a significant fraudulent scheme. He also said the men took steps to keep the retailers from inspecting merchandise and once moved their operation in an attempt to deter a police investigation. -- Mark Larabee



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/13/2003 12:09:19 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
'Maggot Pete' gets six years for food fraud
By David Stringer
13 December 2003


The "founding father" of a £1m food fraud that saw unfit and diseased meat sold to hospitals, schools and leading supermarkets, was sentenced to six years imprisonment in his absence yesterday.

Peter Roberts - known in the meat trade as Maggot Pete - has been on the run in southern Europe since police uncovered his role in the six-year-long racket, in which 450 tons of chicken and turkey, in most cases unfit even to feed to pets, was doctored to make it appear healthy.

The 68-year-old, who failed to appear for sentence at Nottingham Crown Court, was handed a five-year prison term after he was earlier convicted of conspiracy to defraud and a separate one-year sentence for a bail act offence.

Jurors in an earlier trial had heard that he was at the head of a chain of supply that stretched from his Denby Poultry Products firm, in Derbyshire, to businesses in Northampton, Milton Keynes and Bury, who supplied the produce, in many cases unwittingly, to about 600 customers across the UK.

The court was told the food was butchered in sewage-ridden and rat-infested premises in Denby, and delivered in vans crawling with insects.

Sentencing Roberts, of Francis Street, Derby, Judge Richard Benson said: "Under the auspices of Peter Roberts, the business turned into a dreadful enterprise, which exploited the vulnerability of the general public.

"If he had not been the founding father none of this would have happened."

Four men have already been jailed for their part in the conspiracy and a fifth received a suspended sentence.

All five admitted a charge of conspiracy to defraud. Roberts was convicted by a jury after he denied the same offence.

Sentencing the other gang members, Judge Richard Benson said it had been a "wicked and dangerous" fraud which put the general public at risk.

He added: "Anyone in their right mind wouldn't have eaten the food you put into the human food chain had they known what it was."



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/15/2003 11:33:00 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Swindlers know how to scamboozle the unwary
That racket you can hear is coming from the crooks out there,

Bina Brown
December 13, 2003

ONE of the most systematic and widespread scams to be investigated by our corporate watchdog is continuing to wind its way through the courts as a timely reminder of the types of crooked operators on the loose out there.

Charges laid by the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) against the latest of 15 promoters of the Wattle scheme coincide with an alert to investors that "cold callers" - those making unsolicited approaches out of the blue - are renewing attempts to swindle investors in an equally pervasive way.

Graeme Charles Coote, a former director of Brisbane-based the Fund Administrators, was charged with several breaches of the Corporations Law relating to six investors who lost approximately $458,000 invested in the Wattle scheme.

The Wattle Group was an unlicensed investment scheme operated by Geoffrey Robert Dexter which raised over $160 million from more than 2700 Australian investors before he was stopped in 1998. The scheme involved Dexter obtaining unsecured loan funds from investors on the promise of high rates of return, generally 50 per cent a year.

Dexter was convicted on multiple fraud charges and jailed for 10 years in 2001. Unfortunately the essence of the Wattle scheme was not unique. It is a simple and effective scam that has been around for decades.
It was a Ponzi type scheme that paid interest and refunds to investors entirely out of

the incoming funds of new investors entering into the scheme.

Ponzi schemes, named after Charles Ponzi who ran such a scheme in the US in the 1920s, operate under false pretences about how the money is being invested.

In the case of Wattle, investors were told their funds were on-loaned on a short-term basis to provide a return of up to 50 per cent.

According to ASIC, part of the money deposited by early investors is used to pay their first dividend cheques or interest -- which are usually high. The schemes don't need a lot of people in their early stages to be successful and the swindler continues paying them dividends for a couple of months until they are more comfortable with their investments and decide to invest more.

The scamsters rely on people telling their friends and colleagues so that there is a steady flow of funds into the scheme, and the number of investors grows.

If the swindler is disciplined about how much money is kept in the account to pay "dividends", the scam can go on for many years. In other cases schemes fall over because the promoter starts to spend the money too quickly, or the pool of investors starts to dry up.

Now, however, cold-calling, another fairly common and highly effective scam (for the perpetrators), has again raised its ugly head.

Apparently these operators are acting on the strength of a recovery in the overseas financial markets and are trying to lure Australian investors to their boiler room operations. ASIC has added Grace Morley, of New York, and 24 other new organisations to its black-list of 100. ASIC discovered that at least 50 people had sent money to Grace Morley, never to see the cash again.

Grace Morley is doing what others have done before it - phoning previous cold calling victims who may hold worthless or low value shares bought a few years ago. An offer is made to swap the worthless shares for shares such as Microsoft, supposedly for investors who needed a tax loss. Sucked-in investors have been asked for a fee to close the deal.

ASIC has received more than 7300 calls since 1999 from Australians who claimed to have received unsolicited phone calls from overseas investment houses wanting their money. We are attractive to scamsters because many of us are interested in investing, and in many cases we want to fund our own retirement. We may also be gullible, since at least 6000 Australians have fallen for scams, parting with a collective $400 million or more.

Unfortunately, given Australia's ageing population and a potential growing audience, the risk of more people falling victim to these schemes that offer excessive investment returns is increasing. As it is often after they have lost their money that investors contact ASIC with a complaint - by which time their money is either spent or out of the country - consumers must learn to better judge whether to proceed with such investment offers or not.

bina@mediamatters.com.au

The Australian



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/17/2003 4:24:45 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
SEC Points Finger At NYSE Traders

NEW YORK, Nov. 3, 2003

The improperly traded stock represents less than 1 percent of the stock traded at the NYSE over the past three years but was still cause for swift reform, according to the SEC.


(AP) Floor-trading firms at the New York Stock Exchange improperly dealt about 2.2 billion shares of stock over the past three years, according to a report by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The confidential report, obtained by The Wall Street Journal and reported in the paper's Monday editions, accuses the NYSE of failing to maintain an effective self-regulatory structure, costing customers $155 million.

"The NYSE's disciplinary program... does not adequately discipline or deter violative conduct," according to the report.

The improperly traded stock represents less than 1 percent of the stock traded at the NYSE over the past three years but was still cause for swift reform, according to the SEC.

The report, dated Oct. 10, comes at a time when the NYSE is navigating a series of internal probes and management upheavals.

In September, former NYSE chairman Dick Grasso resigned amid outrage over his hefty $188 million pay package. And last month, the exchange announced that it would discipline and seek substantial fines against five floor-trading firms as part of a widening probe into improper trading.

The 211-year-old NYSE is one of the last exchanges in the world that uses human traders, rather than electronic systems, to handle stock.

Among the specific transgressions attributed to floor-trading firms in the SEC report:


Some employees of firms "traded ahead" of customers, buying stock for themselves before they bought for their clients and giving themselves better prices, resulting in a loss of about $128 million to customers;


Employees delayed electronic orders received through the NYSE's Designated Order Turnaround system from reaching the trading floor, allowing other orders to be filled first.

The stock exchange announced last week that it would propose a package of governance changes this week, including splitting the board to make it more accountable to the public.

But it was not immediately clear whether those changes were inspired by the SEC's findings. Neither the stock exchange nor the SEC would comment on the report to the Journal.


©MMIII, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/17/2003 6:03:38 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Former Alger Executive Gets Prison Term in Fund Probe (Update2)

Dec. 17 (Bloomberg) -- James Connelly, former vice chairman of Fred Alger Management Inc., was ordered to spend one to three years in prison for concealing evidence of improper mutual fund trading, becoming the first executive sentenced in the industrywide probe.

Connelly, 40, admitted telling employees to get rid of e- mails containing information about improper fund trading by the Veras Investment Partners LLP hedge fund. He pleaded guilty to a felony in New York State Supreme Court on Oct. 16 and had faced as much as four years in jail.

``Everyone in the financial industry needs to know that concealing and destroying evidence won't be tolerated,'' New York Assistant Attorney General Felice Sontupe said in the court.

Since New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer unveiled his probe of trading abuses in the $7.1 trillion mutual fund industry on Sept. 3, Steven Markovitz, a former trader at Millennium Partners LP, and Nicole McDermott, a former executive at Security Trust Co., have pleaded guilty to felony charges. In all, employees at more than 20 companies are under investigation.

The sentencing of Connelly boosts ``the profile of the mutual fund investigations and shows the government is serious,'' said James Cox, a professor at the Duke University School of Law. ``With every case Spitzer wins, it raises the concern in the securities industry that he may come knocking on the door.''

`Based on Trust'

Judge James Yates said in New York State Supreme Court that he received 72 letters on behalf of Connelly from friends and former colleagues. He said the sentencing was made because the markets and the justice system are ``based on trust.''

Alan Vinegrad, Connelly's lawyer, argued in court that Connelly should avoid prison because he and his family he's already been humiliated and his three daughters depend on him.

``Jim Connelly is a broken man,'' Vinegrad said in the court. ``Sending him to jail is entirely unnecessary.''

Veras made 36 trades in Alger funds in a six-month period this year after negotiating an agreement with Connelly, Fred Alger President Daniel Chung said in a note to shareholders in October. Connelly also coached subordinates on how to answer lawyers of the New York-based money manager after it received a subpoena on Sept. 3, according to court documents.

In October, Connelly agreed to pay $400,000 to settle separate Securities and Exchange Commission allegations that he permitted improper fund trading, and to be barred for life from working for a brokerage or advisory firm. He neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing in settling the SEC charges.

Market Timing

In the three-month-old investigation, state and federal regulators have filed complaints against employees at nine companies including Putnam Investments and Amvescap Plc's Invesco Funds Group.

Regulators have focused on frequent trading, or market timing, where some investors are allowed to profit from the fact that mutual funds are valued once a day at 4 p.m. New York time, while the securities in the funds often trade throughout the day. Repeated buying and selling of the funds to take advantage of price discrepancies can increase transaction costs for all mutual- fund owners, reducing longer-term returns.

Last Updated: December 17, 2003 17:10 EST



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/18/2003 9:14:43 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
BIG TRADING FIRM QUITS THE AMEX

By JENNY ANDERSON

December 18, 2003 -- Van Der Moolen, a big floor trading firm, killed its operations on the American Stock Exchange yesterday, becoming the second major company to abandon the embattled marketplace.
Van Der Moolen, one of the leading equity option specialist firms on the Amex, said it was leaving to focus on electronic trading platforms.

Last month, another big trading shop, Timber Hill, ditched the exchange, criticizing Amex technology on the way out the door.

Van Der Moolen said Cohen, Duffy, McGowan, a firm it partially owns, will cease being a specialist in equity options on the Amex. Earlier this month, Van Der Moolen also eliminated its options trading business on the Philadelphia Stock Exchange.

The firm will still act as a specialist in options on the Chicago Board Options Exchange, and will focus on an electronic trading effort it began in October.

"We're disappointed to see Van Der Moolen pull out," said Amex spokeswoman Mary Chung. "But we have received tremendous interest in their products from other specialists and we are in the process of reallocating their books."

Van Der Moolen Vice Chairman Robert Fagenson said the floor-based options business was challenging: "While I have no direct involvement with the Amex, my understanding is the economics simply didn't work."



The Amex has been under pressure to update its technology as exchanges move to increasingly automated systems. "I would expect the exodus to continue," said Jon Najarian, chief market strategist for PTI Securities and a former trader on the Amex. "It's a point-and-click world, and if you can't provide it, it's difficult to ask people to move backwards."

Cohen, Duffy, McGowan executive John McGowan, who was a floor governor at the Amex, resigned from that post Tuesday night, people familiar with the situation said.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/19/2003 11:18:37 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
IN THE MATTER OF MARY CRABTREE

On December 19, the Commission announced the issuance of an Order
Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Making Findings, and Imposing
a Cease-and-Desist Order Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Order) against Mary E. Crabtree (Crabtree). The
Order finds that Crabtree violated Exchange Act Section 13(b)(5) and
Rule 13b2-1 by knowingly falsifying the books and records of Genesco
Inc. (the Company) when she improperly recorded goods as shipped when
they were not shipped until the following period. Crabtree also violated
Section 13(b)(5) when she knowingly circumvented the Company's system of
internal controls by scanning bills of lading into the Company's
accounting system before the goods were shipped. Crabtree was a cause
of the Company's violations of Section 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act
by improperly recording sales revenue and failing to keep books and
records that accurately recorded the Company's transactions and
disposition of assets for each quarter in fiscal year 2001 and the first
two quarters of fiscal year 2002.

Based on the above, Crabtree is ordered to cease-and-desist from
committing or causing any violations and any future violations of
Section 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Rule 13b2-1, and shall cease
and desist from causing any violations and any future violations of
Section 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act. Crabtree consented to the
issuance of the Order without admitting or denying any of the
allegations in the civil injunc



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/20/2003 11:08:27 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
MERRILL SHOCKER

By JOHN LEHMANN


SINGING:
Daniel Gordon, former head energy trader at Merill Lynch, copped a plea for stealing $43 million from the company and may finger others under a plea deal.

December 20, 2003 -- The financial whiz kid who swindled Merrill Lynch out of a staggering $43 million is set to blow the whistle on the Wall Street powerhouse, including its shady Enron deals.
Daniel Gordon, 27, admitted yesterday that he embezzled millions from the company, but also said Merrill bosses ordered him to cook the books in 2000 to allow the firm to sell the Global Energy Markets division for $600 million.

"I deeply regret my actions that led to the filing of these charges," Gordon said after he dropped his bombshell. "My plea today is the beginning of a long process of making amends to those I have harmed."

In a further blow to Merrill, prosecutors said in new court papers that "managing directors at Merrill Lynch" acted as co-conspirators in falsifying records in relation to the sale of Global Energy Markets to Allegheny Energy Services Corp in Jan. 2001.

Another court document revealed Gordon, a Yale graduate who was only 22 when hired by Merrill to start up an energy trading unit, is set to become a key figure in the Justice Department's ongoing Enron investigation.

He has signed a deal with the Manhattan U.S. Attorney to reveal all he knows about Merrill's deal-making to the FBI and the feds' Enron taskforce.

Gordon turned on his former Merrill colleagues after hobbling into Manhattan federal court on crutches to plead guilty to wire fraud, money laundering and conspiracy - charges that could land him in prison for a maximum 55 years.



Nursing a broken left foot, Gordon admitted he ripped off $43 million from Merrill in a complex scam regarded as the biggest case of employee theft from a major U.S. financial institution in recent history.

Acting as the president of Global Energy Markets in August, 2000, he convinced his superiors to pay the money as insurance to hedge an energy trade - but the cash ended up in a Swiss account he controlled through a sham company based in Anguilla.

He told the court that when Merrill moved to sell the unit a month later, his bosses instructed him to "make the division look more profitable by altering certain of the data."

The division was sold to Allegheny in Jan, 2001 for $490 million plus a 2 percent stake, then valued at $115 million, in Allegheny's unregulated trading and marketing subsidiary.

Merrill moved immediately to discredit their one-time wunderkind, with a spokesman describing him as a liar and a thief.

Under Gordon's cooperation agreement with the government, he will not be prosecuted by the Enron taskforce or for criminal tax offenses.

The SEC yesterday allowed Gordon to settle civil charges over his Enron deals without admitting or denying allegations he entered into the energy transaction to artificially inflate Enron's income by $50 million.

Merrill paid $80 million earlier this year to settle civil charges of wrongdoing linked to Enron transactions.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/20/2003 8:09:08 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
ANOTHER AARON TSAI SHELL FRAUD. PCBM. LOL-> CURRENT BUSINESS INFORMATION: Pinnacle Business Management, Inc. (formerly Mas Acquisition XIX Corp.) is a holding company for subsidiaries that provide consumer lending and deferred deposit services. The Company's Fast Paycheck Advance of Florida, Inc. makes one or two-week advances to individuals who need small amounts of cash until their next payday. The company also operates the All Pro Group of Companies, a collection of interrelated business in Western Pennsylvania that includes several automobile and telecommunications entities.

The Company is not a check-cashing service. The transaction uses certain documents to verify the client's income and makes a loan to the client until their next pay period. Loan Amounts may be $100, to a maximum of $400. The client writes a check to Fast Paycheck Advance, Inc. in the amount of their Advance, plus an administrative or advance fee. The check advance redemption date is the client's next pay period, which can be one week or two weeks at the maximum. At the end of the one week or the two week pay period, the customer returns and redeems his personal check for the amount of the advance plus company fees. If the customer doesn't redeem their check on the day that it is due, the company will deposit the client’s personal check that was written for the advance.

HISTORICAL BUSINESS INFORMATION: The Company on January 19, 2001 acquired the net assets of Lo Castro and Associates, Inc. a Pennsylvania "S" corporation ("Lo Castro"). The Company also acquired the net assets of Arnoni, Lo Castro and Associates, a Pennsylvania general partnership ("Arnoni"). Lo Castro and Arnoni are related entities under common ownership. The price paid for these acquisitions was 83,300,000 shares of the Company's common stock plus a promissory note in the amount of $6,693,465 due in quarterly installments commencing April 1, 2002 through and including January 1, 2007. The purchase price approximated $7,942,965.

In the first quarter 2001 the Company spun off an inactive wholly owned subsidiary, Summit Property Group, Inc. and Pinnacle Business Management Inc's shareholders received a non cash dividend of 1 share of Summit Property Group, Inc. for each 100 shares of Pinnacle Business Management, Inc. Summit Property Group, Inc. subsequently changed its name to Corbel Holdings, Inc.

On November 2, 2001 the Company announced the closing of the Kings Automotive Group acquisition. Purchase terms were $100,000 in cash and a secured note for $119,000.

On April 2, 2002 the Company that its Board of Directors has approved the spin off of its Lo Castro & Associates d.b.a. The All Pro Group, (All Pro). The Company and All Pro have entered into an agreement with Roy Lerman and R.I.P. Consultants. Mr. Lerman is a full Partner and Director with SDO Securities, senior floor broker and member in good standing for over 36 years with the American Stock Exchange. As part of the transaction, the Company's Board of Directors has approved the spin off of All Pro by issuing a non-cash dividend to eligible the Company's stockholders of record as of the close of market May 31, 2002.

On May 23, 2002 the Company announced that in response to the May 7, 2002 Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") trading suspension in its securities for the ten-day period which started at 9:30 a.m. on May 8, 2002 and the SEC injunctive action against the Company and two of its associates, the Company has retained legal counsel to defend the SEC action. The company intends to vigorously defend the SEC's injunctive action. As a result of the SEC's actions, the Company has elected to postpone the planned "spin off" of its subsidiary Lo Castro & Associates, Inc. d/b/a The All pro Group until the SEC's actions can be fully analyzed and clarified.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/20/2003 8:16:26 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
SEC SETTLES LITIGATION AGAINST PINNACLE BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, INC., VINCENT A. LO CASTRO AND JEFFREY G. TURINO


U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 18506 / December 15, 2003
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Pinnacle Business Management, Inc., Vincent A. Lo Castro and Jeffrey G. Turino, 8:02-CV-822 (M.D. Fla., Tampa Div.)
SEC SETTLES LITIGATION AGAINST PINNACLE BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, INC., VINCENT A. LO CASTRO AND JEFFREY G. TURINO
The Commission announced today that the Honorable Elizabeth A. Kovachevich of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, has entered final judgments against Pinnacle Business Management, Inc. and two of its former officers, Jeffrey G. Turino and Vincent A. Lo Castro. Each of the defendants was permanently enjoined from violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. Turino and Lo Castro also were permanently barred from serving as an officer or director of a public company and ordered to pay civil penalties of $60,000 and $25,000, respectively. Finally, Turino was barred from participating in any offering of penny stock for five years. The defendants consented to the judgments without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's complaint.

The Commission's complaint alleged that an April 2, 2002 press release contained materially false and misleading statements regarding a proposed spin-off of a Pinnacle subsidiary known as All Pro. In the press release, Pinnacle stated that after the spin-off to Pinnacle shareholders, All Pro would seek a listing on the American Stock Exchange, and that its initial trading price would be $4.00 per share. The Commission's complaint alleged that Pinnacle lacked a reasonable basis for stating that All Pro would trade at $4.00 per share, that Pinnacle misquoted an AMEX floor broker to convey a false and misleading endorsement of the company's claims, and that Pinnacle overstated the likelihood that All Pro would obtain an AMEX listing. After the Commission filed its complaint, the All Pro spin-off did not take place.

In August 2003, Pinnacle announced that Turino and Lo Castro had resigned from their positions with the company and that the company has "no assets, no operating business and no sources of revenue." The company also disclosed, for the first time, that it has more than 24 billion shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

The settlements conclude the litigation brought by the Commission arising out of Pinnacle's April 2, 2002 press release.



sec.gov 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 12/15/2003



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/21/2003 8:51:01 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
TIS THE SEASON: "Goelo X-MAS mall experience, as told by F G +++ :"

By: smoking_gunn0
01 Feb 2002, 03:25 PM EST Msg. 10543 of 13151
(This msg. is a reply to 10542 by F_Goelo.)
Jump to msg. #

Goelo xmas mall experience, as told by F G +++ :

A couple of weeks ago, as Christmas was
approaching, I was rushing around
> trying to get some last minute shopping done. I
was stressed out and not
> thinking very fondly of the Christmas season
right then. It was dark,
> cold,
> and wet in the parking lot of the mall as I was
loading my car up with
> gifts
> that I felt obligated to buy. I noticed that I
was missing a receipt that
> I
> might need later, so mumbling under my breath, I
retraced my steps to the
> mall entrance.
>
> As I was searching the wet pavement for the lost
receipt, I heard a quiet
> sobbing. The crying was coming from a poorly
dressed boy of about 12
> years
> old. He was short and thin. He had no coat. He
was just wearing a
> ragged flannel shirt to protect him from the cold
night's chill. Oddly
> enough, he was holding a hundred dollar bill in
his hand. Thinking that
> he
> had gotten lost from his parents, I asked him
what was wrong. He told me
> his sad story. He said that he came from a large
family-three brothers
> and
> four sisters. His father had died when he was
nine years old. His mother
> was poorly educated and worked two full time
jobs.
>
> She made very little to support her large family.
Nevertheless, she had
> managed to skimp and save two hundred dollars to
buy her children
> Christmas
> presents. The young boy had been dropped off at
the mall by his mother on
> the way to her second job. He was to use the
money to buy presents for
> all
> his siblings and save just enough to take the bus
home. He had not even
> entered the mall, when an older boy grabbed one
of the hundred dollar
> bills
> and disappeared into the night.
>
> "Why didn't you scream for help?" I asked.
> The boy said, "I did."
> "And nobody came to help you?" I wondered aloud.
> The boy stared at the sidewalk and sadly shook
his head.
> "How loud did you scream?" I inquired.
> The soft-spoken boy looked up and meekly
whispered, "Help me!"
>
> I realized that absolutely no one could have
heard that poor boy cry for
> help. So I grabbed his other hundred and ran to
my car.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/23/2003 1:58:33 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
FBI raids multi-million-dollar California investment firm, alleges fraud
01:55 PM EST Dec 23

DON THOMPSON

SACRAMENTO (AP) - The FBI raided a southern California investment company Monday, alleging that more than 1,800 clients who invested tens of millions of dollars were victims of a long-running confidence scheme.

No charges have been filed, but the FBI is investigating Financial Advisory Consultants as a possible "Ponzi scheme," where early investors are paid with money from later investors, said FBI spokeswoman Laura Bosley.

James Lewis, who variously lists himself as the firm's president or, more recently, its funds manager, told an investor in August that his "growth fund" alone had $62 million US in assets, according to an FBI affidavit. Lewis also operated an income fund that clients said is worth tens of millions of dollars.

His firm had more than 1,800 clients across the United States, one of Lewis's assistants told the FBI.

The Associated Press disclosed earlier this month that Lewis, 57, has been investing millions of dollars for clients and claiming extraordinary financial returns for 20 years, without being licensed or regulated as required.

Moreover, the firm has never provided clients with any details on how it invests their money. Since July, Lewis has been delaying withdrawal requests with the excuse that millions of dollars in investments have been frozen by the Department of Homeland Security - a freeze the AP reported does not exist.

Those details were confirmed in a sworn affidavit used to obtain the search warrant from a federal magistrate.

"There is probable cause to believe that FAC and Lewis, through the use of the mails, engaged in a scheme to defraud investors in FAC's Income and Growth Funds by operating a Ponzi scheme," FBI agent Brad Howard said in his affidavit.

He further alleges that Lewis and the firm used the U.S. mail to sell securities without registering with the federal Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors previously said they had been interviewed and provided financial records to investigators from both the SEC and the state Department of Corporations, although the FBI acted alone Monday.

Chuck Woolstenhulme of Temecula invested $100,000. He tried to get his money back, but failed.

"I'm glad it's come to this," Woolstenhulme said Monday. "It's an important step, I think, to see if there's any money left and how it gets distributed."

Lewis has not responded to multiple telephone messages left by the AP over two weeks, nor to letters sent to him by registered mail and overnight delivery.

In a letter faxed to investors Friday, Lewis said his firm has "never charged for financial advice, nor have we ever sold any securities." He said that means he doesn't need to be registered with the SEC nor the state Corporations Department.

But in its reports to investors, the Orange County firm says it charges a five per cent "management fee" on any profits it earns for its clients.

The state Corporations Department has identified investors in Idaho, Utah, Oregon, Colorado, Georgia and California, according to the FBI affidavit. The AP has had calls from investors living as far away as Michigan.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/23/2003 2:29:04 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Parmalat Can't Document EU9 Billion in Its Accounts (Update5)

Dec. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Parmalat Finanziaria SpA, Italy's biggest food company, is unable to document about 9 billion euros ($11 billion) of funds listed in its accounts, said people familiar with the investigation into the company's finances.

The amount that can't be traced is twice as much as Milan- based Parmalat said was missing last Friday and is only $1.7 billion below the company's asset value at the end of 2002. Prosecutors on Monday questioned former executives as part of the probe, said the people, who asked not to be named.

The maker of long-life Parmalat milk, Archway cookies and Pomi pasta sauces may file for bankruptcy protection as soon as today after the Italian government passed a decree to make it easier for the company to continue operating. The probe may widen into Italy's biggest investigation of corporate wrongdoing since 1993, when Ferruzzi Finanziaria SpA collapsed with $20 billion in debt.

``We've only seen the tip of the iceberg,'' said Alessandro Frigerio, who helps manage the equivalent of $621 million at Pigoli Consulenza in Milan. Pigoli holds Parmalat bonds maturing in 2005.

Failure by Parmalat to meet repayments on 6 billion euros of debt would be the second-largest default of a European company rated by Standard & Poor's. NTL Inc., the U.K. cable-television company, is the largest.

A Parmalat spokesman, who refused to be identified by name, declined to comment on the investigation.

Francesco Greco, the prosecutor who also investigated Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi on charges of false accounting, is leading the probe. Greco also played a prominent role in Italy's ``Clean Hands'' business corruption probe in the early 1990s.

D for Default

Parmalat moved closer to collapse on Friday after Bank of America Corp. rejected the authenticity of documents claiming one of the company's subsidiaries had 3.95 billion euros at the bank at the end of 2002. The bank today said it filed a criminal complaint after meeting with Italian prosecutors.

Bankruptcy would threaten 36,000 jobs at Parmalat, whose founder Calisto Tanzi resigned last week, as well as the repayment of 2 billion euros of bank loans and about 4 billion euros owed to bondholders.

Banca Intesa SpA, Italy's largest bank, Capitalia SpA and UniCredito Italiano SpA, have loaned more than 900 million euros to Parmalat and are among the banks with the most money at stake.

The country's largest dairy company, controlled by the Tanzi family, has a credit rating of D, for default, at Standard & Poor's. The stock plunged 63 percent yesterday to 11 euro cents. The shares and bonds have been suspended for today's session, the Italian stock exchange said.

Avoid Quakes

The company, founded in 1961, grew from a family salami and ham maker based near Parma to a global food business with annual sales of 7.6 billion euros. About a third of its revenue comes from North America. Tanzi resigned on Dec. 15 after Parmalat barely avoided default on 150 million euros of bonds, paying four days late and raising concern about a cash crunch.

``Calisto Tanzi was always considered a good entrepreneur, he was viewed with affection,'' said Giuseppe Romanini, mayor of Collecchio, headquarters of Parmalat's food business near Parma.

Parmalat's near-default is Europe's biggest financial scandal since Dutch supermarket chain Royal Ahold NV last February said it had overstated profit over three years, politicians said. It comes about two years after Enron Corp., the former U.S. energy trader, admitted it hid billions of dollars of debt in off-the-book partnerships and filed what was at the time the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history.

``This case is comparable to Enron,'' said Corrado Berlenda, who manages 500 million euros for Euromobiliare Asset Management in Milan. ``We need more serious controls that avoid such quakes.''

Tanzi and three of Parmalat's former chief financial officers, including Fausto Tonna who quit Dec. 10, are being investigated for possible fraud, according to Italy's Ansa news service.

Tonna, reached by telephone at his house in Collecchio, declined to comment on the reports. ``I haven't received any notification from court authorities,'' he said.

Deminor, a shareholder advocacy group, said it's considering legal action to help institutional investors ``recover the losses they have suffered on their Parmalat investments.''

Last Updated: December 23, 2003 14:07 EST



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/23/2003 5:00:55 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
SEC SETTLES WITH FORMER JOSEPHTHAL BRANCH OFFICE MANAGER FOR
FAILURE TO SUPERVISE

On December 22, the Commission announced settlement of
public administrative proceedings against Richard M.
Ohlhaber (Ohlhaber). Ohlhaber was a branch office manager
for Josephthal & Co., Inc. (Josephthal), a broker-dealer
formally registered with the Commission. The Commission's
order found that, from at least October 1998 through May
2001, Ohlhaber failed reasonably to supervise two registered
representatives in Josephthal's Addison, Texas branch
office, who were subject to his direct supervision. The two
registered representatives, each of whom had a disciplinary
history or a history of customer complaints and who were
subject to special supervision, engaged in fraudulent sales
practices by making excessive, unsuitable and unauthorized
trades in certain of their customers' accounts. While
ostensibly performing special supervisory procedures,
Ohlhaber failed reasonably to supervise the first
representative, when he failed to respond to red flags
showing evidence of excessive and unsuitable trading in
three of the customers' accounts and, over the objection of
the customer, refused to reverse unauthorized trades.
Ohlhaber failed reasonably to supervise the second
registered representative when, during a six-month special
supervisory period, he continued to approve numerous
unsuitable securities transactions in the accounts of two
unsophisticated investors. Additionally, during this same
period, Ohlhaber never contacted the customer to verify the
trading activity in the account, a period in which 19
unauthorized trades were made. Without admitting or denying
the Commission's findings, Ohlhaber agreed to be barred from
association with any broker or dealer in any supervisory
capacity with the right to reapply for association after
three years and to pay a civil money penalty of $50,000.
(Rel. 34-48968; File No. 3-11161)



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/26/2003 12:25:53 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
Investors fear they'll lose millions in alleged Ponzi scam
DON THOMPSON
Associated Press

SACRAMENTO - More than 5,200 clients across America trusted James Paul Lewis Jr. with their life savings, pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into his Southern California investment funds on the word of a few friends.

Many heard about Financial Advisory Consultants through fellow churchgoers, although professional athletes and at least one movie actor are said to be investors.

As their own retirement accounts sagged with the stock market, they marveled at Lewis' reports of consistently returning upward of 40 percent from one fund and 20 percent from another, year in and year out for two decades.

They scrambled to give him money, any caution or doubts pushed aside as they saw their fellow investors periodically withdraw as much as $250,000.

Their financial future came crashing down this week, when a federal judge froze the company's assets and the FBI carted away documents and computers from Lewis' three-room Orange County office suite.

No charges have been filed, but the FBI alleges Lewis was operating a "Ponzi scheme," in which early investors are paid with money from later investors. The federal Securities and Exchange Commission says the "fraudulent scheme" involved $813 million from more than 5,200 investors.

"It's a house of cards," said Barry Minkow, himself once imprisoned for seven years for defrauding investors through his ZZZZ Best carpet cleaning company. "It will go down as the longest-running Ponzi scheme in history, and the mutual fund that didn't exist."

Minkow, who now works as an anti-fraud investigator for San Diego-based Fraud Discovery Institute, provided state and federal regulators with documents questioning Lewis' legitimacy, also prompting an investigation and story by The Associated Press earlier this month.

The FBI's search warrant and the SEC's civil complaint listed the same warning signs as the AP's story: the 57-year-old Lewis was investing tens of millions of dollars for clients and claiming extraordinary financial returns without being licensed or regulated as required.

Moreover, the El Toro-based firm has never provided clients with any details on how it invests their money. Since June, Lewis has been delaying withdrawal requests with the false excuse that millions of dollars in investments have been frozen by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

Yet investor after investor told the AP that they missed or ignored the warning signs in what the FBI and other scam experts said appears to be a classic case of affinity fraud.

"He's a family man, he's a religious man, he goes to church every Sunday. He sent us pictures of his grandchildren," said Tom Parsa of Irvine. "This is devastating, devastating news."

Parsa was vacationing in Mexico when he heard that the more than $3 million invested by his family was in jeopardy.

"We always likened him to a poor man's Warren Buffett," said Kevin Haugh, 47, of Woodbridge, Va. He sent Lewis $30,000 three weeks ago to add to the roughly $2 million three generations of his family thought they had squirreled away. "I was planning on retiring in a few years. That obviously isn't going to happen."

Lewis has not responded to multiple telephone messages left by the AP over three weeks, nor to letters sent to him by registered mail and overnight delivery. His attorney, Douglas J. Pettibone, also did not return repeated telephone messages.

At the same time Lewis began spreading what federal investigators call the bogus Homeland Security freeze story and delaying withdrawals requested by more than 150 investors last summer, he raised the minimum investment from $25,000 to $100,000 for his growth fund and from $10,000 to $25,000 for his income fund.

Though Lewis has blocked most withdrawals from his funds since June, he withdrew $3 million from his own account on July 1, SEC records show.

He "continues to live well," his administrative assistant, Mary Lopez, told federal investigators last week.

Lopez, who has worked with Lewis since 1997, told investigators that Lewis not only has a home in Laguna Niguel, but a vacation home in Palm Desert and a membership in the nearby Indian Ridge Country Club where the initiation fee goes for $95,000 and the monthly fee is $785.

He owns at least one Mercedes Benz automobile and is awaiting delivery of another, Lopez said in a sworn statement to the SEC.

The firm operated with no more than three employees, and Lewis himself rarely showed up at the office after the first year she worked there. When Lewis did show up, he spent his time trading on his computer. Lopez said Lewis told her he was trading Swiss francs on his own time and account.

The only funds that flowed into the firm were from investors themselves.

In six years, Lopez saw no business activity or any indication of the lucrative projects Lewis wrote about in his monthly newsletters. Clients accepted the newsletters and Lewis' monthly statements as the only evidence they needed that investments were soaring in good times and bad. When one client demanded more information, Lewis told him to take his business elsewhere, authorities said.

Many of Lewis' investors learned of Financial Advisory Consultants through friends at church, and were eager to get in on a semisecret investment opportunity that appeared open to only a lucky few. Many considered Lewis a friend, some attending weddings and funerals with him.

Clients say Lewis is a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, or Mormons, and his first clients came from that community. But over the years, his investors came from churches of many other denominations as well.

Most said they accepted the word of their fellow churchgoers, and were reassured when Lewis periodically paid out as much as a quarter-million dollars to mostly wealthy investors who rarely withdrew the bulk of their contributions.

Yet Robert FitzPatrick, the co-author of "False Profits" and president of Pyramid Scheme Alert, said Financial Advisory Consultants had all the earmarks of "a classic Ponzi scheme."

They include the promise of financial returns that are too good to be true; a total lack of details or accounting on how the company is making its money; and word of mouth recruiting among friends and associates.

"The only transactions occurring are later transactions paying for earlier transactions, with the whole thing run through one individual," FitzPatrick said. "This company doesn't even have to show the cash. All they're doing is sending out a sheet of paper saying, 'Hey, you're worth all this money.'"

Even allowing investors to periodically withdraw a portion of their money is a routine part of a confidence scheme, FitzPatrick said.

One San Diego investor, who asked to remain anonymous, said he'd invested about $500,000 - most of his net worth - but had been slowly withdrawing several hundred thousand dollars to care for his 4-year-old autistic son.

With the firm's collapse, "I'll have to pretty much sell my house, sell everything," he said. "My life's pretty much devastated."

"It's not a very merry Christmas," sighed another investor who asked to remain anonymous. He fears he's out more than $1 million.

ON THE NET

Pyramid Scheme Alert: pyramidschemealert.org 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/30/2003 8:17:55 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
SEC bans WAMEX, Absolutefuture promoter DeTrano forever
Securities and Exchange Commission *SEC
Tuesday December 30 2003 Street Wire

by Brent Mudry

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission has banned convicted New York penny stock promoter Roger DeTrano from the penny stock market for life for his role in manipulating two stocks through offshore accounts at Vancouver brokerage Union Securities. In a recent administrative decision, the SEC rejected the pleas of leniency from Mr. DeTrano, an associate of the alleged Mafia-linked promoter Edward Durante.
In a decision dated Dec. 4, 2003, SEC Administrative Law Judge James T. Kelly notes that Mr. DeTrano pled guilty to conspiracy to commit securities fraud in one stock, WAMEX Holdings Inc., and was fined $494,000 in an SEC civil suit relating to the other stock, AbsoluteFuture.com Inc. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) In the criminal case, he was sentenced Sept. 20, 2002, in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, to 70 months in prison and three years of supervised release.
Most of the proceeds from the Union Securities accounts were transferred to an alleged money laundering account at the main downtown Vancouver branch of Bank of Montreal, in the name of Exchange Bank and Trust, a Nevis-based offshore bank headed by Terry Neal. The Internal Revenue Service claims that more than $100-million moved through the EBT account for its assorted clients in a two-year period prior to its being frozen in the spring of 2000.
The SEC's broad ban prohibits Mr. DeTrano from participating in any offering of any penny stock. This includes acting as any promoter, finder, consultant or other person who engages in activities with a broker or issuer for the purposes of the issuance or trading in any penny stock, or inducing or attempting to induce anyone to buy or sell any penny stock.
In the administrative proceeding, Mr. DeTrano, who represented himself, indicated his intention not to call witnesses on his behalf, and he waived his right to an in-person public hearing. The SEC was represented by staff attorneys Linda Bridgman and Tesha Chavier.
Judge Kelly noted that the criminal indictment alleged that from November, 1999, through June, 2000, Mr. DeTrano conspired with others to manipulate the price and volume of WAMEX shares, and he issued false and misleading statements to the public. The SEC evidence included an affidavit of Ms. Chavier, which quoted a statement Mr. DeTrano made under oath with his guilty plea.
"I conspired with others to manipulate the price of WAMEX stock from approximately November of '99 through June of 2000 in Manhattan. WAMEX I knew was a publicly traded stock. I agreed with others, who are my co-defendants, to have issued to me 19-and-a-half million shares of the company and to an entity that I controlled... I understood that the shares would be used approximately to manipulate the market price of the stock, and I agreed with others to issue false and misleading press releases concerning the development of WAMEX. Certain of these press releases were disseminated through e-mail blasts, by public relations firms associated with Mr. Simmons," stated Mr. DeTrano as part of his plea. (Mr. Durante used the alias Ed Simmons.)
Judge Kelly also noted that in the SEC's civil case, Mr. DeTrano was ordered Jan. 22 to pay $494,700, including disgorgement of $401,000 and interest of $94,000. His New York shell company, Commonwealth Partners, shares $198,000 of this disgorgement order jointly and severally. The total fines against Absolutefuture and other defendants reached $3.5-million, led by Mr. Durante, who was ordered to pay $1.97-million, including $1.62-million in disgorgement and $354,000 in prejudgment interest.
"I have considered DeTrano's claim that the (SEC Enforcement) Division is attempting to portray him as the mastermind of two manipulation schemes, with almost no focus on his business associate, who he characterizes as the real architect of the schemes," states Judge Kelly. The judge notes, however, that the SEC gave Mr. Durante a similar lifetime penny stock ban on Aug. 7 in an unrelated case, involving shares of PSA Inc.
Judge Kelly ruled that Mr. DeTrano cannot escape a sanction by asserting that his business associate, Mr. Durante, is even more culpable than he is. The judge also ruled that while Mr. DeTrano has stated he is remorseful, this is not sufficient to present a real issue for a hearing.
The judge noted that Mr. DeTrano's misconduct was not isolated, as the criminal conviction and the SEC injunction show he engaged in two overlapping but separate stock manipulations from November, 1999, through June, 2000. "The violations stopped only when the Department of Justice and the Commission intervened to make them stop," stated Judge Kelly.
In reviewing Mr. DeTrano's case, the judge notes the promoter, now in his late 50s, has spent his entire career in the financial services industry. "There is a genuine possibility that DeTrano will return to that industry following his release from prison and be presented with opportunities to engage in future penny stock offerings and misconduct similar to the violations evidence by this record," states Judge Kelly. "His past misconduct thus provides a basis for inferring a risk of probable future misconduct."
Judge Kelly notes that while Mr. DeTrano speculates that his criminal conviction may make it difficult to get a job in the securities field, this does not minimize the public interest in imposing a penny stock ban against the promoter. The judge also notes that general deterrence must be considered, as a ban against Mr. DeTrano may deter others from engaging in similar misconduct.
THE CRIMINAL CASES
Mr. DeTrano faced three separate criminal cases relating to WAMEX and Absolutefuture.
In the first, he was charged in June, 2000, as part of Operation Uptick, the FBI's biggest assault on Mafia-linked stock promotions, which targeted a total of 120 defendants, including 10 members and associates of the five La Cosa Nostra, or Mafia, families in New York. Mr. DeTrano's indictment noted millions of shares of WAMEX were sold through Vancouver brokerage Union Securities, an innocent conduit. Court records show Mr. Durante later told authorities he made $24-million in WAMEX profits with the help of Mr. DeTrano.
In the second and third cases, unsealed in October, 2001, Mr. DeTrano was charged with securities fraud relating to Absolutefuture and Vinex Wines before and after Operation Uptick. In the wake of Uptick, Mr. Durante flipped, pled guilty on Dec. 7, 2001, and became a star federal operative, helping lure Mr. DeTrano and others, including Union broker Trevor Koenig and former Vancouver offshore accountant Michael K. Graye, in scripted stings orchestrated by FBI agents. (Mr. Durante was sentenced to 121 months, or just over 10 years, in prison on Sept. 26.)
Mr. DeTrano pled guilty in the first case and was sentenced to 70 months, or just under six years, in prison. His charges in the other two cases are believed to have been stayed as part of his plea agreement.
THE SEC CASE
Mr. DeTrano was a defendant in the Absolutefuture and WAMEX cases, two of four SEC cases targeting Mr. Durante and his associates. The four civil cases, launched Oct. 11, 2001, comprised the biggest ever prosecution of defendants doing business through Vancouver brokerage and banking conduits by the SEC, which credited the British Columbia Securities Commission for its assistance. Altogether, the SEC charged that 44 defendants, led by Mr. Durante and Mr. DeTrano, made more than $30-million in illegal profits in manipulations of WAMEX, Absolutefuture, U.N. Dollars Corp. and Ramoil Management Ltd.
In the Absolutefuture complaint, the SEC claims that the public company issued 1.1 million shares to Mr. DeTrano's Commonwealth Partners in December of 1999 and three million shares to four of Mr. Durante's offshore companies: Berkshire Capital Partners Inc., Dottenhoff Financial Ltd., Galton Scott & Golett Inc., all registered in Nevis, and Zimenn Importing and Exporting Inc., registered in the Philippines. The regulator claims that while these 4.1 million shares were purportedly issued to the DeTrano and Durante entities for purported consulting services, this was a sham and the shares were in fact used in the scheme to manipulate Absolutefuture's stock price.
Dottenhoff was first linked to Exchange Bank and Trust in June, 2000, by Stockwatch, the day the FBI launched its Operation Uptick arrest sweep. Stockwatch revealed that similarly spelled Dotenhoff Financial, an offshore mob-linked client of Vancouver brokerage Union Securities, was likely related to Dobbins & Dotenhoff Ltd., a Nevis account linked by Stockwatch a month earlier to EBT.
"Durante maintained brokerage accounts for all of those entities at Union Securities in Vancouver, Canada. During the relevant period, Durante exercised trading authority in his name and his alias name, Ed Simmons, in the Union Securities brokerage accounts held in the names of those entities," states the SEC in its complaint.
The SEC also claims that between January and April of 2000, Mr. Durante and Mr. DeTrano manipulated Absolutefuture shares by selling the 4.1 million consulting shares and by buying and selling a further 3.3 million shares on the open market. Mr. Durante allegedly conducted his manipulative trading through his Berkshire, Commonwealth Associates, Dottenhoff, Galton and Zimenn accounts, while Mr. DeTrano allegedly participated in the scheme through his company, Commonwealth Partners. The regulator notes the stock rose from a low of 21 cents in December of 1999 to a high of $6 in March of 2000.
"Durante also transferred proceeds of the manipulation scheme to sub-accounts he controlled in an account held by relief defendant EBT at the Bank of Montreal in Vancouver, Canada. In all, Durante transferred approximately $19-million in trading profits from the AFTI and related stock manipulation schemes to the EBT sub-accounts between January and April, 2000," states the SEC.
Unfortunately for Mr. Durante, the BCSC froze the Vancouver bank account, which then had more than $17-million on deposit, in April, 2000, at the request of the SEC, which was chasing cross-border wire transfers of Stephen Sayre, a completely unrelated tout.
In the aftermath of the assorted Durante cases, Union broker Mr. Koenig was arrested at the border, pled guilty in New York in a co-operation deal and has since returned home to the Vancouver area after doing his time. WAMEX executives Russell Chimenti and Mitchell Cushing were also convicted. Mr. Cushing was sentenced in October, 2002, to more than eight years in prison, partly based on the testimony of Mr. Koenig at a jury trial that July. Mr. Graye pled guilty in New York March 27, 2002, in conjunction with his plea in the unrelated 7-Up Canada money laundering case in Toronto.
(Readers wishing more details of the WAMEX case may refer to Street Wires including those dated June 14, June 15 and Sept. 1 in 2000, Nov. 5 and Nov. 8 in 2001, July 4 and July 9 in 2002, and the Koenig pieces, under the U.S. symbol WAMX. Other WAMEX-related cases are noted in Street Wires dated Sept. 1, 2000, and March 22, 2002, under the same symbol.)
(The Absolutefuture case is noted in Street Wires dated Nov. 13, 2001, under the Canadian symbol *BCSC and Nov. 14 and Nov. 19, 2001, under the U.S. symbol AFTI.)
(Readers wishing more details of Union's Koenig case may refer to Street Wires dated Sept. 13, Sept. 14, Sept. 17, Sept. 18, Sept. 20, Sept. 26, Sept. 27, Sept. 28, Oct. 5, Oct. 29 and Nov. 28 in 2001, Jan. 2, Feb. 5, Feb. 11, Feb. 26 and May 17 in 2002, Jan. 7 and Jan. 23 in 2003 under the Canadian symbols *BCSC, *CDNX or *TSX, or the U.S. symbol WAMX.)
(Former Itex head Mr. Neal's Exchange Bank & Trust affair is noted in an initial 28-part Stockwatch series in Street Wires May 4, May 5, May 8, May 9, May 10, May 11, May 12, May 16, May 17, May 18, May 19, May 23, May 24, May 26, May 29, May 30, June 1, June 5, June 15, Sept. 19, Oct. 6, Oct. 24 and Nov. 30 in 2000, Jan. 19, Jan. 24, April 3, May 11 and June 21 in 2001, and numerous updates since, under the Canadian symbol *BCSC and the U.S. symbol ITEX. Mr. Neal's separate criminal case is noted in Street Wires dated Dec. 31, 2002, Jan. 2, Jan. 10, Jan. 22 and April 24, 2003, under the Canadian symbol *BCSC.)
(Mr. Graye's case is noted in Street Wires including those dated Oct. 30, Oct. 31, Nov. 1, Nov. 2, Nov. 12 and Dec. 12 in 2001, and Jan. 18, Feb. 4 and May 21 in 2002.)
bmudry@stockwatch.com

(c) Copyright 2003 Canjex Publishing Ltd. stockwatch.com 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)12/31/2003 11:25:04 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
oxford-international-management.com  FURTHER VINDICATION!!



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/2/2004 3:02:27 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Man accused in scam takes 5th
By Don Thompson
Associated Press

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The owner of an investment firm under investigation for an alleged $813 million Ponzi scheme won't disclose personal and business assets to federal regulators, citing his right to avoid self-incrimination, his attorney said Wednesday.
James Paul Lewis Jr. did not show up Wednesday to answer questions put to him by the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of its lawsuit against Lewis and his firm, Financial Advisory Consultants.
Though no criminal charges have been filed, the FBI and SEC allege Lewis and his firm defrauded more than 5,200 investors. They allege that although he reported his funds were growing by 20 percent to 40 percent a year, he actually was just paying his clients with the money of later investors.
The California Corporations Department has identified investors in Utah, Idaho, Oregon, Colorado, Georgia and California, according to an FBI affidavit.
Many of Lewis' investors learned of Financial Advisory Consultants through friends at church and were eager to get in on a semisecret investment opportunity that appeared open to only a lucky few.
Clients say Lewis is a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and his first clients came from that community. But over the years, his investors came from churches of many other denominations as well.
A federal judge last week ordered Lewis to provide an accounting of his assets.
"Mr. Lewis, through his attorney, has asserted his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination in response to that," said his attorney, Douglas J. Pettibone.
Lewis couldn't provide a complete accounting anyway, Pettibone said, because the FBI took key documents when it raided the El Toro offices of Financial Advisory Consultants last week.
SEC Associate Regional Director Sandra Harris declined comment on Lewis' response.
Authorities say that since June, Lewis has delayed clients' withdrawal requests with the false excuse that millions of dollars in investments had been frozen by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
Robert William, 52, of Palm Beach Gardens, Fla., who says he invested his life savings of $2 million with Lewis, said Wednesday he was given the security freeze story in August when he tried to withdraw $90,000. He was allowed to withdraw $20,000 in November and $30,000 in December, but has spent all but $4,300 of that by Wednesday.
"We're flat broke," William said. "We got a double whammy. We're out of money and filing bankruptcy, and I found out I have cancer — all in one day."



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/2/2004 9:02:54 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Accesstel new IR THE SKY IS THE LIMIT!! LOL FELON AND DISBARRED STOCK BROKER

DAG Enterprises / Investor Relations

sos.state.co.us 
Douglas A Glaser- incorporator

===============================================

How many Douglas A Glasers from Colorado can there be ...typical ex-broker turned PR man

The Division represents that Glaser became a fugitive!
google.com 

In the Matter of :
:
SKY SCIENTIFIC, INC., W.A. DOROW, JR., :
JERRY L. FOSTER, :
GILBERT MARSHALL & CO., INC., :
MICHAEL A. USHER :
STRATEGIC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC., :
WILLIAM A. MOLER, DANIEL R. LEHL, : INITIAL DECISION
THOMAS PATRICK MEEHAN, : March 5, 1999
DOUGLAS A. GLASER, :
SMITH, BENTON & HUGHES, INC., :
MICHAEL ZAMAN, GEORGE T. HELLEN, :
ROBERT SCHLIEN, :
AMERICAN CAPITAL NETWORK, INC., :
PHILIP M. GEORGESON, :
MELVIN L. LEVINE, and :
WILLIAM DAVID JONES



I. PRELIMINARY MATTERS A. Investigative Testimony Respondents Foster, Schlien, Levine, Jones, Douglas A. Glaser (Glaser), and Lehl gave sworn testimony before the Commission during its investigation of Sky. (Div. Exs. 84-91, 96.) The Division represents that Glaser became a fugitive shortly after the default order was entered against him in the instant proceeding, and he was unavailable to testify at the hearing. (Division's Motion to Admit Prior Sworn Testimony of Respondent Glaser at 2.) The other Respondents who had testified during the investigation subsequently invoked the Fifth Amendment and refused to testify when called by the Division at the hearing. (Tr. 595-98, 741-42; Tr. 1/20/98 at 6-7.)
==================================

Contact:
DAG Enterprises, Inc.
Investor Relations
(888) 777-3320
(303) 355-6555
(303) 322-6558, Facsimile

Accesstel Inc. Announces Completion of Acquisition of Euro Offline
Friday January 2, 4:46 pm ET


DENVER, Jan. 2, 2004 (PRIMEZONE) -- Accesstel Inc. (OTC BB:ACST.OB - News) is pleased to announce they have completed the acquisition of Euro Offline, an established high end furniture company located in Denver, CO.
The company will be trading under a new name and symbol within 10-15 business days.

About Euro Offline

Euro Offline is an established, high end furniture company located in Denver, Colorado, dealing with exclusive European lines such as DeSede (Switzerland), Minotti, MDF, Cappellini and Bonacina (Italy), Walter Knoll and Draenert (Germany) to name a few. You can access a complete overview of products they offer by visiting their web site eurooffline.com 


On behalf of the Board
Randall L. Middleton

Forward Looking Statement

This press release may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements are based on the Company's current expectations as to future events. However, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this press release might not occur, and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements.



Contact:
DAG Enterprises, Inc.
Investor Relations
(888) 777-3320
(303) 355-6555
(303) 322-6558, Facsimile


===================================

ttp://www.nasdr.com/pdf-text/rca1297.txt

Douglas A. Glaser (Registered Representative, Evergreen, Colorado) was fined

$30,000 and barred from association with any NASD member in any capacity.

The sanctions were based on findings that Glaser failed to disclose a felony

charge on a Form U-4 and failed to respond to NASD requests for information.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/2/2004 9:33:23 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
Lockyer launches fraud probe of California-based mutual funds
JENNIFER COLEMAN
Associated Press
Posted on Fri, Jan. 02, 2004


SACRAMENTO - Attorney General Bill Lockyer said Friday he has started an investigation into whether three California-based mutual fund companies failed to disclose they were paying brokers for recommending certain mutual funds.

Lockyer wouldn't name the three companies that are under investigation, but said all were implicated in the Security and Exchange Commission's investigation of Morgan Stanley. The SEC and Morgan Stanley reached a settlement last month when the financial firm agreed to pay a $50 million fine and change its business practices after allegedly steering clients toward "preferred" mutual funds in exchange for millions of dollars in commission payments from those companies.

The state is launching its own investigation to ensure that "California investors are able to participate in any restitution and reform," Lockyer said in a telephone interview Friday.

The San Mateo-based mutual fund company Franklin Templeton confirmed that it was one of the three companies to receive subpoenas, said Lisa Gallegos, director of corporate communications. She said the company would have no further comment on the investigation.

American Funds also received a subpoena from Lockyer Friday, said Chuck Freadhoff, spokesman for the Los Angeles-based mutual fund firm.

"It's a broad subpoena, covering our relationships with broker-dealers," he said.

The company is cooperating with Lockyer's investigation, Freadhoff said, adding that his firm's sales practices are within federal regulations.

Lockyer said a new law that went into effect Thursday gave him greater authority to investigate corporate securities laws. The law gives the AG jurisdiction to investigate violations of the state's securities law. Previously, only the commissioner of corporations could pursue those cases.

"What we're trying to do is make it clear that we're going to aggressively use this new authority on behalf of consumers who were harmed," Lockyer said.

The attorney general said he's probing an industry practice of "selling shelf space," which amounts to mutual fund companies buying space on a broker's list of recommended buys. Failure to disclose the arrangement to consumers could violate state securities law, Lockyer said, and could result in fines, disgorgement of illegal profits or prison sentences.

The investigation could expand to include other mutual fund firms, and the brokers who sell mutual funds.

Lockyer asked employees of mutual funds or brokers who have knowledge of security law violations to contact his office through its new whistleblower hotline.

__

On the Net:

The attorney general's Web site: ag.ca.gov 

The attorney general's Whistleblower Hotline is (800) 952-5225



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/3/2004 5:02:34 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Douglas A. Glaser Accesstel IR. LOL

ORDERED pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act and
Section 21C of the Exchange Act that Douglas A. Glaser cease and desist from committing or causing violations or any future violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder;

ORDERED pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Exchange
Act that Douglas A. Glaser is barred from association with any
broker, dealer, or registered securities association.

ORDERED pursuant to Section 21B of the Exchange Act that
Douglas A. Glaser disgorge $210,800 plus prejudgment interest
from July 1, 1995, through the last day of the month preceding
which payment is made at the rate of interest established under
Section 6621(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code, 28 U.S.C. .
6621(a)(2), compounded quarterly, pursuant to Rule 610 of the
Commission s Rules of Practice; and

ORDERED pursuant to Section 21B of the Exchange Act that
Douglas A. Glaser pay a civil penalty of $745,000.

Payment of sums owed shall be: (i) made by United States
postal money order, certified check, bank cashier s check, or
bank money order; (ii) made payable to the Securities and
Exchange Commission; (iii) delivered by hand to courier to the
Office of the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450
5th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549; and (iv) submitted under
cover letter which identifies Glaser as the Respondent in these
proceedings, and the file number of these proceedings. The
Division shall submit a plan of disgorgement no later than sixty
(60) days after Glaser has paid any or all of the disgorgement
amount and interest.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/5/2004 12:41:16 AM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Airports to Fingerprint Foreign Visitors

January 4, 2004 10:39 PM EST


WASHINGTON - Foreigners entering U.S. airports and seaports from all but 28 nations will have their fingerprints scanned and their photographs taken this week as part of a new program to tighten border security.

Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge was to be in Atlanta Monday morning to help launch the program at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport.

Other top federal officials will be at other aiports across the nation to help draw attention to the new policy.

All 115 U.S. airports that handle international flights and 14 major seaports are covered by the program, under which Customs officials can instantly check an immigrant or visitor's criminal background.

Called US-VISIT, or U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology, the program will check an estimated 24 million foreigners each year, though some will be repeat visitors.

The only exceptions will be visitors from 28 countries - mostly European nations whose citizens are allowed to come to the United States for up to 90 days without visas.

Inkless fingerprints will be taken and checked instantly against a national digital database for criminal backgrounds and any terrorist lists. The process will be repeated when the foreigners leave the country as an extra security measure and to ensure they complied with visa limitations.

Homeland Security spokesman Bill Strassberger said once screeners become proficient, the extra security will take only 10 to 15 seconds per person. Foreign travelers also will continue to pass through regular Customs points and answer questions.

Photographs will be used to help create a database for law enforcement. The travel data is supposed to be securely stored and made available only to authorized officials on a need-to-know basis.

A similar program is to be installed at 50 land border crossings by the end of next year, Strassberger said.

Brazilian police started fingerprinting and photographing Americans arriving at Sao Paulo's airport last week in response to the new U.S.

Brazil's Foreign Ministry has requested that Brazilians be removed from the U.S. list.

"At first, most of the Americans were angered at having to go through all this, but they were usually more understanding once they learned that Brazilians are subjected to the same treatment in the U.S.," Wagner Castilho, press officer for the federal police in Sao Paulo, said of those arriving at Sao Paulo-Guarulhos International Airport last Thursday.

The U.S. system consists of a small box that digitally scans fingerprints and a spherical computer camera that snaps pictures. It will be used for the estimated 24 million foreigners traveling on tourist, business and student visas who enter through an airport or seaport.

The new system will gradually phase out a paper-based system that Congress mandated be modernized following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

A person whose fingerprints or photos raise questions would not be turned away automatically. The visa holder would be sent to secondary inspection for further questions and checks. Officials have said false hits on the system have been less than 0.1 percent in trial runs.

The system was scheduled to begin operation Jan. 1, but was delayed to avoid the busy holiday travel period.

Congress provided $368 million to produce the system and put it in airports, but only provided $330 million of the $400 million President Bush requested to put the system in land borders in 2004.

On the Net:

dhs.gov 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/5/2004 1:47:48 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
No Fraud in F&G Stock Sale, Judge Says

Jan. 05, 2004

By: Glenn J. Kalinoski
Managing Editor
glenn@dmnews.com

More than two years after its bankruptcy filing, former cataloger Foster & Gallagher is back in the headlines.
The Peoria (IL) Journal Star reported that about 4,000 former workers likely will not collect retirement benefits following a ruling by U.S. District Court judge Michael Mihm on Dec. 30 that no wrongdoing was involved when company executives sold $70 million in stock options to the employees' stock ownership plan in 1995.

Also reported was that U.S. Trust, the trustee of the employee stock ownership plan, was not negligent and did not cause the plan to pay an excessive amount for the stock.

The newspaper said the issue in the three-week bench trial, which stemmed from a suit filed in summer 2001, centered on whether company founder Thomas Foster, chairman Melvyn Regal and president Robert Pellegrino defrauded workers by not informing U.S. Trust regarding concerns of "an impending government crackdown on the direct-mail sweepstakes, a marketing technique used extensively by Foster & Gallagher at the time."

Mihm ruled the accusations to be unfounded, judging sweepstakes as "still highly profitable for F&G in 1995," with the situation continuing for two more years, ending with "negative publicity and a governmental crackdown on sweepstakes in 1998."

In 2001, the 50-year-old, privately held company liquidated its Spring Hill Group, Michigan Bulb Group, Gurney's Group and all of their subsidiaries, and sold the Gift Group, which included Walter Drake and The Home Marketplace catalogs, to Brecon Capital Co., San Francisco.




E-mail this article to a friend


Read more articles on Catalog/Retail



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/5/2004 7:23:31 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
SEC obstructor Janu fourth to plead out in Slatkin case
Securities and Exchange Commission *SEC
Wednesday December 31 2003 Street Wire

by Brent Mudry

The former bookkeeper of controversial EarthLink co-founder and ex-Scientology minister Reed Slatkin has agreed to plead guilty in a conspiracy to obstruct justice during an investigation by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission of Mr. Slatkin. Jean Janu, 56, formerly of Santa Fe, N.M., is charged with helping former Howe St. player Mr. Slatkin hide his massive $593-million alleged Ponzi scheme, an unregistered investment operation he ran from 1985 until its collapse in the spring of 2001. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.)
The SEC announced Dec. 10 that Ms. Janu agreed on Dec. 5 to plead guilty, the same day she was charged in a one-count criminal information in United States District Court for the Central District of California. She faces an arraignment hearing on Jan. 12, 2004, and is expected to formally enter her guilty plea either that day or later that month.
Ms. Janu is the fourth figure to plead guilty to obstruction of justice during the SEC investigation. Mr. Slatkin, based in Santa Barbara, Calif., was sentenced Sept. 3 to 14 years in prison, after pleading guilty to 15 counts, including conspiracy to obstruct justice. Richard D. McMullin was sentenced Dec. 1 to five months in jail and five months of house arrest, after pleading guilty last year. Daniel W. Jacobs, who pled guilty on Oct. 15, 2002, faces sentencing Feb. 23, 2004.
U.S. officials have called the case one of the largest Ponzi schemes in history. Mr. Slatkin allegedly preyed on the rich and famous, luring and conning scores of Hollywood stars and producers, Internet executives and high-society types.
Mr. Slatkin only made $65-million in real gains, but he distributed hundreds of millions to investors, leaving a $255-million shortfall as the Ponzi scheme collapsed. His reputation as a savvy investment guru was largely based on his only significant win, after EarthLink founder Kevin O'Donnell convinced him to invest as a major seed shareholder in 1994. Mr. Slatkin resigned from the board of EarthLink, the second largest Internet service provider in the U.S., on April 26, 2001, and the company has dissociated itself from him.
In reality, the former minister's investment empire was little more than a massive Ponzi scheme. By the end of 2000, Mr. Slatkin would have required an estimated $130-million annually to keep his hypothetical investment structure from collapsing, according to the SEC. Aside from his EarthLink windfall, most of Mr. Slatkin's other purported stock market investments were either disasters or non-existent.
(Mr. Slatkin got his start in disastrous investing on Howe Street, the centre of dealings on the former Vancouver Stock Exchange. He was a private-placement investor in Athena Gold Corp. in 1991, when the VSE-listed company was promoted by fellow Scientologists Michael Baybak and Kenneth Gerbino. Athena was subsequently acquired by Wally Berukoff's Miramar Mining Corp. in 1995. Neither the SEC nor the Department of Justice make any allegations regarding Mr. Slatkin's dealings on the VSE; nor is any connection to Mr. Baybak, Mr. Gerbino or Mr. Berukoff suggested. Mr. Baybak filed a libel suit against Time magazine over an unflattering May 6, 1991, eight-page cover feature profiling the Church of Scientology, which included a sidebar story featuring the Athena Gold promotion of Mr. Baybak and Mr. Gerbino.)
Among Mr. Slatkin's 500-plus victims were actor Giovanni Ribisi, who starred as a sleazy broker in the film Boiler Room, and Hollywood producer Armyan Bernstein, who arranged for Arnold Schwarzenegger and Kevin Costner to star in a video for the now jailed promoter's 50th birthday celebration. Others did better. Fox News anchor Greta Van Susteren, who defected from CNN in 2002 as a long-time anchor and legal commentator, was paid out $659,000 more than the $2.07-million she and her husband John Coale invested with Mr. Slatkin.
Although Mr. Slatkin was a high-profile Scientologist for several decades and many of his victims and a number of his supporters and associates were also Scientologists, the Church of Scientology makes its position clear. "Earlier this year his ministerial status was revoked and he was expelled from the church," media director Linda Simmons Hight told Stockwatch in early 2002. "His unethical conduct violates the basic policies and ethics codes of the church and is unbecoming of a Scientologist." According to Ms. Hight, there is no record of Mr. Slatkin practising as a minister in any Church of Scientology since 1983.
Burned investors have blamed the SEC, which began an informal investigation of Mr. Slatkin in 1997 and launched a formal investigation in 1999, for doing too little too late.
MS. JANU'S GUILTY PLEA AGREEMENT
The 10-page guilty plea agreement, with a six-page stipulated statement of facts attached, was signed by Ms. Janu, her lawyer Victor Sherman, and Assistant United States Attorneys Steven Olson and Michael Wilner, the case prosecutors.
In the agreement, Ms. Janu confirms that she worked from 1993 through May, 2001, for Mr. Slatkin, who raised more than $593-million from about 800 investor accounts, posing as a successful investment adviser and money manager with documented above-average returns. Ms. Janu, who worked as a bookkeeper for Mr. Slatkin both in Santa Fe and Santa Barbara, was responsible for preparing and sending out periodic portfolio statements to investors.
"From approximately December, 1999, to approximately May, 2001, Janu intentionally corruptly influenced, obstructed and impeded, and endeavored to influence, obstruct and impede... the SEC," states the plea agreement.
The SEC launched its formal Slatkin investigation in November of 1999. On Dec. 13, 1999, he was subpoenaed to testify under oath and produce all relevant financial and accounting documents. Ms. Janu was issued a similar subpoena on Nov. 29, 1999.
Ms. Janu now admits that from January through December of 2000, she prepared fake documents for submission to the SEC. Under Mr. Slatkin's direction, she created and revised account statements and other documents supporting his claim that he held more than $500-million in brokerage accounts with NAA Financial, an entity purportedly based in Zurich.
The bookkeeper and her staff prepared computerized spreadsheets for the SEC which purportedly showed all the stocks Mr. Slatkin held and had traded on behalf of several categories of his investors. "At Slatkin's direction, Janu carefully altered the font, margins, headers and overall appearance of these spreadsheets to present this information in the supposed format of an NAA account statement," states the plea agreement.
Ms. Janu admits that in a further bid to make the fabricated NAA statements look authentic, she and Mr. Slatkin used a calendar to select monthly closing dates from 1997 through 1999. The bookkeeper never saw any real NAA account statements, as Mr. Slatkin told her they were unavailable.
Ms. Janu, also at Mr. Slatkin's direction, created bogus correspondence that NAA purportedly sent to Mr. Slatkin to enhance the illusion that he maintained large brokerage accounts in Europe featuring significant stock transactions.
To appear authentic, Ms. Janu printed the fake NAA account statements on blank, European-sized stationery with NAA's name and supposed Swiss address. She then folded these statements in thirds to make it appear they had been mailed from Switzerland.
Taking few chances at being observed, Ms. Janu never printed these bogus NAA statements in the presence of her employees, and she stored the stationery blanks at her home.
Ms. Janu admits that NAA existed only as a bogus entity used to support Mr. Slatkin's claim that it held hundreds of millions of dollars of investors funds overseas, in a bid to delay the SEC investigation and hide the fact that he was operating a massive Ponzi scheme.
The bookkeeper also admits preparing other documents for Mr. Slatkin to submit to SEC investigators, including lists of investors with nil balances, as proof that he had liquidated their portfolios and distributed their money back to them.
Ms. Janu further admits to providing false testimony to the SEC under oath in a Feb. 16, 2000, interview, when she claimed she was unaware of any accounts which Mr. Slatkin maintained outside the U.S. The bookkeeper also testified that she had never heard of NAA Financial. The bookkeeper further falsely testified that she followed GAAP, or generally accepted accounting principles, in preparing investors' account statements and calculating their purported portfolio returns.
The Janu-Slatkin facade did much more than hamper the SEC probe.
"Based on the documents and testimony it received during its investigation, including documents and testimony from Janu, the SEC took no action against Slatkin during 2000 and the first part of 2001. During this time, Slatkin obtained more than $145,200,000 in additional investor funds," states the plea agreement.
Ms. Janu also agreed to plead guilty to a second count, relating to destruction of records.
In this account, she agrees that in preparing account statements for Mr. Slatkin's investors, she never reviewed records from brokerages to confirm the existence of stock transactions and holdings. The only records she possessed to substantiate these transactions were the bogus NAA statements she prepared at Mr. Slatkin's direction in 2000. Ms. Janu also knew that in addition to submitting the bogus papers to the SEC, Mr. Slatkin allowed certain investors to review them, to alleviate their concerns about his assets, solvency and legitimacy.
"After Slatkin gave the fake NAA statements to the SEC and to investors, Slatkin and Janu were concerned that someone would discover that the records were bogus. In particular, Slatkin and Janu were concerned that Janu's computer would be seized and searched by law enforcement officials," states the plea agreement.
Ms. Janu admits that she and Mr. Slatkin decided to take steps to eliminate evidence of their creation of the bogus FAA statements. To this end, Mr. Slatkin had a hard-drive-wiping program called BCWipe installed on Ms. Janu's office computer and hired a computer consultant to train her to use the program to erase files and prevent their detection and recovery.
Ms. Janu subsequently worked to destroy the computer evidence. "Janu intended to delete these computer files to prevent law enforcement agencies and others from searching her computer and discovering that the NAA statements submitted to the SEC were fake and that she had prepared them," states the plea agreement.
bmudry@stockwatch.com

(c) Copyright 2004 Canjex Publishing Ltd. stockwatch.com 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/5/2004 7:41:17 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Jean Janu H & R BLOCK TAX SVC is a business entity in NM

2 Matches Found
Searching: Jean Janu | State: ALL
Purchase the Details:

OPTION 1: Buy for $19.95
OPTION 2: Buy Single Records for $9.95 (click on the record)


Results are sorted alphabetically by state. Scroll down to view.




JEAN JANU, INC. is a business entity in NM




H & R BLOCK TAX SVC is a business entity in NM


Modify Search | New Search



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/5/2004 9:31:18 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/6/2004 4:50:23 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Investment firm owner has fraction of millions he owes, SEC says
DON THOMPSON
Associated Press
Posted on Tue, Jan. 06, 2004

SACRAMENTO - The owner of a Southern California investment firm has just a small fraction of the $813 million he owes more than 5,200 investors nationwide, the federal Securities and Exchange Commission said Tuesday.

A preliminary review shows James Paul Lewis Jr. has assets of about $2.3 million in cash, $5.8 million in investments in two private companies, and interests in three residences, the SEC said in a court filing.

The filing asks a federal judge to appoint a receiver to search for more assets to repay his thousands of investors, many of whom entrusted his Orange County-based Financial Advisory Consultants with their life savings.

The initial review of Lewis' records, seized by the FBI in a pre-Christmas raid, shows he used investor funds for purposes including trading in foreign currency and buying luxury automobiles and expensive jewelry, the SEC said.

Lewis' attorney, Douglas J. Pettibone, said he had not seen the filing and could not immediately comment.

Lewis, 57, of Laguna Niguel. told clients his twin investment funds had annual returns of 20 percent and 40 percent, respectively, over 20 years, in good economic times and bad. By the time the FBI and SEC shut down the operation, records showed the funds were worth more than $813 million on paper, had they in fact been generating the extraordinary returns Lewis reported.

But his administrative assistant, Mary Lopez, told federal investigators in sworn statements that the only funds that flowed into the firm were from investors. She said Lewis showed up at the three-employee El Toro operation only rarely, and then spent his time trading Swiss francs on what he told her was his own time and account.

Lopez, who had worked with Lewis since 1997, told investigators that Lewis has a home in Laguna Niguel, a vacation home in Palm Desert and a membership in the nearby Indian Ridge Country Club, where the initiation fee goes for $95,000. She said he owns at least one Mercedes Benz and was awaiting delivery of another.

The SEC said it was acting, in part, because Lewis refused last week to disclose his own assets as required by a federal judge, citing his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. He also failed to show up for a court-ordered deposition, where he would have been required to answer questions under oath.

No criminal charges have been filed in the case, but the SEC obtained a temporary restraining order freezing Lewis' assets on Dec. 22, the same day as the FBI raid. That was 12 days after The Associated Press disclosed that Lewis was unlicensed, had no apparent business activities other than collecting money from investors, and was falsely telling investors he couldn't refund their money because of a homeland security freeze.

Though Lewis has blocked most withdrawals from his funds since June, his records show he withdrew $3 million from his own account on July 1.

The SEC says it wants the temporary receiver appointed to find and recover any remaining investor funds and propose a plan to distribute what's left to Lewis' investors.

The SEC has set up an information line for investors at (323) 965-3261.

A court hearing on the SEC's actions had been set for Wednesday, but both the SEC and Pettibone have asked for a delay.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/6/2004 8:12:02 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT YOU AGAIN GOELO-> Accesstel Inc. (BB: ATEL)

By: flops5
05 Jan 2004, 05:52 PM EST
Msg. 13522 of 13555
(This msg. is a reply to 13520 by VanIsland.)
Jump to msg. #  
What a group of hosers. You got screwed, black & blued and tatooed by a full time crook. He suckered you in not once but numerous times while he was filling his pockets with your money.

Everything from he saw the 20 million on deposit to Dr. Lee was a Board of Director was a lie and he knew it from the get go. but while he and the other chit holes he was working with got you to buy his scam deals he was selling.

Don't just sit there morons report report report!!!!!! Put this vermon away for good. Add to the case the SEC already has against him and the rest of his playmates.

ragingbull.lycos.com 

By: flops5
05 Jan 2004, 07:56 PM EST
Msg. 13533 of 13555
(This msg. is a reply to 13532 by the_truth_lives.)
Jump to msg. #  
Wasn't it obvious that all the corporate profiles put up on the various scams from the same crook were set up the same.

Didn't Markow have a poster solicit individuals in chat rooms to buy stock in one of his scams prior to it trading. Didn't those that responded to the solicitation to buy stock receive a message directly from Markow to either send the money to him or one of his corporations that both his son and wife signed off on documents as officers. This in spite of Markow having already been admonished by the NASD and several states for illegally selling stock to the public. He already had a number of Cease and desist orders for illegally selling off his stock scams to the public.

Report report report this family. Every document and statement builds a better case against them. They already have your money in their pockets from the stock they hyped you into buying from them. Now they have the money in their pockets from selling the ATEL shell to another questionable group. report report report!

ragingbull.lycos.com 

By: flops5
05 Jan 2004, 10:39 PM EST
Msg. 13535 of 13555
(This msg. is a reply to 13534 by VanIsland.)
Jump to msg. #  
Ater soliciting everyone in the chat rooms to buy stock in their next scam this was the letter Markow sent to those who responded to get them to send the money in so he could dump his worthless paper. If you responded and got this letter from Markow report his arse. This was not only illegal but he was already under orders to stop illegally selling stock to the public. report report report

April , 2000

-----------

-----------
-----------

Re: Score One, Inc.

Dear

Please mail via Federal Express your check in the amount of $$$$$ made payable to Michael M. Markow or if it is more convenient to you please wire funds to the following account:

Wells Fargo Bank

Encino, California

Routing #

Acct #

FBO: Worldwide Corporate Finance

Any questions please call.

Thank you.

Michael M. Markow
President

15760 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1020 *Encino, California 91436 * Phone: 818 783-0054 * Fax: 818 783-1120 * Email:

ragingbull.lycos.com 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/6/2004 11:31:57 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
THE POWER OF CHRIST COMMANDS YOU GOELO.....COME CLEAN WITH THE SEC AND I KNOW 8 GOOD PEOPLE THAT WILL PUT IN THE GOOD WORD FOR YOU. THE POWER OF CHRIST COMMANDS YOU



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/6/2004 11:44:55 PM
From: Sir Auric GoldfingerRespond to of 19401
 
FG; this kind of crap will keep you permanantly barred from the US if not arrested on site: "Seven Carrier Groups are useless to protect the US of MNA citizens abroad and terrorists would have little difficulty dumping 50 pounds of Anthrax spores into the wind, from tall buildings in every major town, simultaneously..."

You really are an ass. A French one at that.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/7/2004 12:08:25 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
You are scum Goelo." Seven Carrier Groups are useless to protect the US of MNA citizens abroad and terrorists would have little difficulty dumping 50 pounds of Anthrax spores into the wind, from tall buildings in every major town, simultaneously... There is little or no defense against people prepared to die for their ideals, as Israel has found out..."
.

To:Edscharp who wrote (10146)
From: Francois Goelo Tuesday, Jul 16, 2002 2:58 AM
View Replies (3) | Respond to of 12450

>>> 2: a native or inhabitant of No. America or So. America
My point, exactly and you'll note that it comes before the definition that you retained...

Customs can always be altered, as the language evolves, as you correctly pointed out... One must be more specific, so as not to lose one's identity and the only country that may rightly call itself by the name of its Continent, is Australia... Imagine the confusion, if you were trying to determine whether a person is Italian or German and all you got for reply, was: "I am European"...

Actually, some posters have already adopted the US of Mid-North America name, since I floated the idea a while back, so there is hope...

The US of MNA will be overtaken by countries better managed, inhabited by more intelligent, harder working and less wasteful people... Certainly China would be a candidate, in the next 10 to 15 years...

However, Security is going to become more difficult and expensive: soon, the US of MNA will be a Nation of mostly Security Guards, that produce nothing of any economic value, except for a potentially misplaced feeling of Safety...

Seven Carrier Groups are useless to protect the US of MNA citizens abroad and terrorists would have little difficulty dumping 50 pounds of Anthrax spores into the wind, from tall buildings in every major town, simultaneously... There is little or no defense against people prepared to die for their ideals, as Israel has found out...

Add to this the misplaced belligerence of Bush, who strives to keep uncertainty AND the price of Oil, close to all time highs...

A Nation run by Oil-men short on Ethics: what do you expect?...

JMHO, F. Goelo + + +



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/7/2004 2:04:08 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
MAYBE A CAVE funphone.com 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/7/2004 6:47:48 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
PurchasePro->Executive gets nearly three years for fraud scheme linked to AOL


By Matthew Barakat
ASSOCIATED PRESS
1:21 p.m. January 7, 2004

ALEXANDRIA, Va. – A former top executive of a software company that engaged in illegal bookkeeping deals with America Online was sentenced to nearly three years in prison Wednesday for conspiracy to commit wire fraud.

Jeffrey R. Anderson, a former senior vice president at a now defunct Las Vegas software company called PurchasePro, pleaded guilty in September in U.S. District Court in Alexandria to a corporate fraud scheme that allowed the publicly traded company to falsely inflate revenues to meet Wall Street expectations.

As part of a plea agreement, he agreed to cooperate with the investigation, which federal prosecutors said Wednesday is ongoing.

AOL, now a division of Time Warner, is never mentioned by name in the charges against Anderson, but court documents make it clear that AOL is the company with which Purchase Pro entered a fraudulent agreement to falsely inflate revenues.

Under the scheme, AOL received $30 million in PurchasePro stock in late 2000 for referring business to PurchasePro under the terms of a contract between the two companies. In reality, though, AOL should have received no more than half that amount, and Anderson created false business records to make it appear that AOL deserved credit for certain referrals. In return, AOL agreed to reward PurchasePro with revenue in future quarters.

Court documents identify one unnamed AOL executive as a co-conspirator in the fraud. AOL spokesman Nicholas Graham declined comment Wednesday.

AOL's accounting irregularities are also under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and numerous lawsuits have been filed by investors who claim they were defrauded by what they claim were AOL's attempts to artificially boost its revenue.

Anderson received a sentence of 33 months in prison and a $2,000 fine. Prosecutors had sought a five-year sentence, the maximum allowed.

In a 22-page statement of facts that accompanied the plea agreement, Anderson admitted that PurchasePro recognized in 2000 and 2001 that the company could not sell its primary product, a "marketplace license" that gave businesses access to a special online marketplace, on its face value alone. In secret deals, which were hidden from the company's auditors, PurchasePro essentially promised to reimburse companies for the licenses they purchased. The scheme allowed PurchasePro to falsely inflate its revenues.

U.S. Attorney Paul McNulty said the prison sentence "sends a strong message to those who think they can cheat honest citizens of their investments."

Anderson's lawyer did not immediately return a phone call Wednesday seeking comment.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/7/2004 7:32:32 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
January 2, 2004 -- A seat on the American Stock Exchange sold for a paltry $72,000 this week - a fraction of its record high and yet another damning sign that Wall Street sees very dim prospects for the exchange.
At the peak of the market, an Amex seat sold for $725,000 in June 2000. Since then, the Amex has lost market share in both options and exchange-traded funds, a business it once dominated.
"This has been a challenging year for the derivatives exchanges, and the Amex continues to take measures to remain competitive in all aspects of our business," said Mary Chung, a spokeswoman for the Amex.
She declined to confirm seat sale prices.
The price of a seat on the Amex has fallen more than 83 percent since the record high in 2000.
Two additional seats sold on Dec. 22 for $80,000 - and those seats were apparently sold back to the NASD, the current owner of the Amex, according to the exchange's weekly members' bulletin.
The previous seat sale was for $120,000 on Oct. 31, according to the Amex's Web site.

Seat prices at many exchanges have been falling since the market's downturn and surge in electronic trading.
But the Amex has had a particularly bumpy ride because its efforts to strike a deal to sell itself have failed.
In November, the stock exchange and its parent, the NASD, announced the exchange would be spun off to its members.
The deal, whose price was not disclosed, is intended to allow the exchange to figure out how to compete more effectively in the trading of options, equities and exchange-traded funds.
The NASD had earlier struck an agreement in principle to sell the stock exchange to Chicago-based private equity firm GTCR last summer. But that deal fell apart.
Recently, two trading firms - Van der Moolen and Timber Hill - have given up their longtime businesses on the exchange. Another, Spear Leeds & Kellogg, has trimmed operations there.
The Amex's market share in equity options fell to 22.3 percent in 2003 from 30.6 percent in 2001, according to the Options Clearing Corp.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/7/2004 7:41:20 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
Jail awaits him here ...... But one of brothers convicted in fraud is safe in San Francisco

By DAVID SANDS, EDMONTON SUN
Wednesday, January 7, 2004


Catch him if you can. One of three brothers wanted in Alberta for a massive fraud has surfaced in San Francisco.

"I'm not going back there - why would I?" Kevin Patrick Boyle told the Sun in a telephone interview yesterday.

Boyle is slated to serve 30 months in jail if he's ever nabbed in Alberta, after being sentenced by provincial court Judge Allan Lefever.

"He is subject to immediate imprisonment upon arrest," said Joni Delaurier, spokesman for the Alberta Securities Commission.

However, "he's is not subject to arrest here at this time," said San Francisco police Sgt. George Carrington.

On Aug. 31, 2001, Boyle and two brothers - Brian James and Jason Patrick - were convicted of offences under the Alberta Securities Act after bilking investors of $1.3 million.

However, none of the three showed up in court for the verdict and warrants for their arrest remain in place to this day. All three were sentenced in their absence: Kevin Boyle to 30 months, Brian Boyle to 26 months and Jason Boyle to six.

But Kevin Boyle said he'll serve not a single day.

"I have had counsel in both Canada and here who have told me they (Alberta officials) can't execute the warrant. And I am not saying that to challenge anyone. There's just no jurisdiction," Boyle said yesterday, adding he chose to move to San Francisco because his wife has family there.

A San Francisco official told the Sun that at least one other Boyle brother is in the area, working with Kevin.

According to San Francisco businesses, Kevin Boyle is seeking investors in a feature film. And while no permits for the production have been issued, that's not illegal, said both Sgt. Carrington and Carole Isaac, deputy director of the San Francisco Film Commission.

Boyle claims the brothers' prosecution here was flawed and unfair, and that's why they've fled and won't return. The Alberta Securities Commission will check to see whether it's possible for Kevin Boyle to be arrested in California, said Delaurier.

"We are watching the developments in the U.S. and reviewing our ability to execute the warrant."

Meanwhile, news of Boyle's Canadian quandary came as a surprise to potential investor Susie Katzman, general manager of Tommy's Joynt, an eatery and pub that Boyle said could be - for a fee - featured in his planned movie.

"Wow. That's interesting," said Katzman, who discussed a possible investment while at Boyle's office at 505 Mongomery, in San Francisco.

On the advice of friends and industry experts, she didn't get involved.

Others have, said Sgt. Carrington, adding that while the venture is "unusual," he wouldn't speculate on whether any laws were being broken.

Boyle's background is known to the film commission, but Isaac could not say if that would have any bearing on any application by Boyle to produce a film in the city.

"One must say this is rather extraordinary," Isaac said.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/7/2004 11:21:38 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
GOELO, WE ALL KNOW YOU WERE JUST TRYING TO "SCORE ONE"

THEY ARE MAKING A SPECIAL RING OF FIRE IN HADES FOR THIS KIND.

WAITING FOR GOELO'S JUDGMENT DAY!!

THETRUTHSEEKER



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/7/2004 11:23:58 PM
From: StockDungRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 19401
 
******Pick Of The Week: SCRO+54% by Francois Goelo
Message 14630516

To: Stock Watcher who started this subject
From: Stock Watcher Friday, Oct 20, 2000 7:02 PM ET
Reply # of 39962

******Pick Of The Week (POW): SCRO + 54% by Francois Goelo, all results here:

SWCM + 36% (mkelly761)

WFHC + 32% (Due Diligence)

ASYS + 24% (nokomis)

BWSI + 24% (RC Stein)

VSAT + 24% (Fav's)

NTAP + 22% (mkelly761)

STLW + 20% (CrayUSA)

ITRU + 19% (daddydo)

NOVN + 19% (Amigo Sergio)

CAMP + 19% (Fav's)

SGNT + 18% (daddydo)

FLEX + 18% (CrayUSA)

AKAM + 15% (debby)

VION + 15% (Snowman)

BEIQ + 15% (rellabourn)

DPRS + 15% (RCJIII)

CRUS + 15% (RC Stein)

POW Index - Final:



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/7/2004 11:33:38 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
GOELO, ITS NOT OVER TILL WE SAY ITS OVER. UNTIL THEN ITS LIKE THAT GUY RECENTLY SAID ON RAGINGBULL.

REPORT REPORT REPORT!! Put this vermon away for good. Add to the case the SEC already has against him and the rest of his playmates.


By: flops5
05 Jan 2004, 05:52 PM EST
Msg. 13522 of 13555
(This msg. is a reply to 13520 by VanIsland.)
Jump to msg. #
What a group of hosers. You got screwed, black & blued and tatooed by a full time crook. He suckered you in not once but numerous times while he was filling his pockets with your money.
Everything from he saw the 20 million on deposit to Dr. Lee was a Board of Director was a lie and he knew it from the get go. but while he and the other chit holes he was working with got you to buy his scam deals he was selling.

Don't just sit there morons report report report!!!!!! Put this vermon away for good. Add to the case the SEC already has against him and the rest of his playmates.

ragingbull.lycos.com 

By: flops5
05 Jan 2004, 07:56 PM EST
Msg. 13533 of 13555
(This msg. is a reply to 13532 by the_truth_lives.)
Jump to msg. #
Wasn't it obvious that all the corporate profiles put up on the various scams from the same crook were set up the same.

Didn't Markow have a poster solicit individuals in chat rooms to buy stock in one of his scams prior to it trading. Didn't those that responded to the solicitation to buy stock receive a message directly from Markow to either send the money to him or one of his corporations that both his son and wife signed off on documents as officers. This in spite of Markow having already been admonished by the NASD and several states for illegally selling stock to the public. He already had a number of Cease and desist orders for illegally selling off his stock scams to the public.

Report report report this family. Every document and statement builds a better case against them. They already have your money in their pockets from the stock they hyped you into buying from them. Now they have the money in their pockets from selling the ATEL shell to another questionable group. report report report!

ragingbull.lycos.com 

By: flops5
05 Jan 2004, 10:39 PM EST
Msg. 13535 of 13555
(This msg. is a reply to 13534 by VanIsland.)
Jump to msg. #
Ater soliciting everyone in the chat rooms to buy stock in their next scam this was the letter Markow sent to those who responded to get them to send the money in so he could dump his worthless paper. If you responded and got this letter from Markow report his arse. This was not only illegal but he was already under orders to stop illegally selling stock to the public. report report report

April , 2000

-----------

-----------
-----------

Re: Score One, Inc.

Dear

Please mail via Federal Express your check in the amount of $$$$$ made payable to Michael M. Markow or if it is more convenient to you please wire funds to the following account:

Wells Fargo Bank

Encino, California

Routing #

Acct #

FBO: Worldwide Corporate Finance

Any questions please call.

Thank you.

Michael M. Markow
President

15760 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1020 *Encino, California 91436 * Phone: 818 783-0054 * Fax: 818 783-1120 * Email:

ragingbull.lycos.com 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/8/2004 10:34:40 AM
From: StockDungRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 19401
 
RE;GOELO->Dear Posters, Here is a new Reverse Merger, slated to start trading round April 10th... The symbol will be disclosed as soon as the 8K is filed... This is an established Company with a proven record of profitability, expanding at the rate of about 70%, fully audited by one of the "Big Six": BDO International .... Here are the details of the Company, in a nutshell with photos attached:

Flexible and rigid circuit boards manufacturer from Kong Kong: Rev: $20 Mil... Earnings: $3.7 Mil for 1999, growing at 70% rate... Over 600 employees... 450,000 sq. ft. factory... 20 Millions shares outstanding... Float 3.5 millions... As of Sept. 1999, Assets: $7 Millions and Liabilities: $4 Millions... 1999 trailing EPS:18 cents... Forward 2000 EPS: 30 cents... Estimated PE: 50_. Compares with bigger Companies in same field: FLEX (PE: 82) and ARX (PE: 116)... Will start trading around $5.00_. Short term primary target: $15.00_.

The group responsible for the R/M would like to attract qualified Posters to support the stock on SI and RB message Boards... To provide an incentive, they offer up to 10,000 shares (no minimum) at approximately half the opening price, say $2.50, on the understanding that these shares would be kept a minimum of three months or until the price reaches the $15.00 level... The transaction would be in the form of Certificates overnighted to the poster's address and payment is expected after receipt... A full information package with product samples will also be made available...

If this proposal is of interest to you, kindly reply with the number of shares wanted, name, address and phone number, so that the Certs can be prepared in advance... Other similar opportunites are in the pipeline, if the arrangement is mutually agreeable...

Best regards,

F. Goelo

=====================

Score One Inc · 8-K · For 3/25/3 · EX-10.1

5.03 LITIGATION. Except for the investigation in Hong Kong and the
cooperation with the Securities and Exchange Commission. there is no claim,
action, suit, arbitration or other legal or administrative proceeding, nor any
order, decree or judgment pending or in effect, or to the best knowledge of
Score One, in progress or threatened, against or relating to Score One,
Advanced Technology or Fu Cheong, any of their officers or directors or the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement which could have a materially
adverse effect on Score One.
===================================

SPECIAL COVERAGE OF MARKOW AND GOELO'S HUGE PROBLEMS*
......."Portrait of an Honest Business Man."

FORMER BOILER ROOM BROKER SUES INTERNET POSTERS
THE BAZAAR STORY OF MICHAEL MARKOW AND FRANCOIS GOELO THE CAYMAN TOUT

MICHAEL MARKOW AND FRANCOIS GOELO
THE CAYMAN TOUTS ALEDGED SCHEME
TO SELL UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
VIA INTERSTATE COMMERCE TO CHAT
ROOM SUPPORTERS

FROM AN EMAIL SUPPLIED BY A UNDERCOVER OPERATIVE THAT DISCRIBES THE SCAMMING BRIBE:

The group responsible for the R/M would like to attract qualified Posters to support the stock on SI and RB message Boards... To provide an incentive, they offer up to 10,000 shares (no minimum) at approximately half the opening price, say $2.50, on the understanding that these shares would be kept a minimum of three months or until the price reaches the $15.00 level... The transaction would be in the form of Certificates overnighted to the poster's address and payment is expected after receipt... A full information package with product samples will also be made available...

If this proposal is of interest to you, kindly reply with the number of shares wanted, name, address and phone number, so that the Certs can be prepared in advance... Other similar opportunites are in the pipeline, if the arrangement is mutually agreeable...

Best regards,

================

**SPECIAL COVERAGE OF MICHAEL MARKOW'S HUGE PROBLEMS**

......."Portrait of an Honest Business Man."

........A litany of lies and a dossier of deceit

scan.cch.com 

scan.cch.com 

scan.cch.com 

Word has it that Michael Markow got tipped off and escaped the Boiler Room Raid?

I am sure it will all come out as the "Honest Business man" and "straight shooter" sues internet posters. His attorney from what I understand called Marcow an "Honest Business Man"?

Wonder if he is held in contemp of court?

Go to this arbitration link which is most shocking;
scan.cch.com 

-------------------------------------------

SEC Order Bars From Brokerage Industry Woodland
Hills: Latest action
comes after regulators shut down Brokers Investment
Corp., alleging it was a
huge boiler-room operation. Other former Brokers
Investment personnel have
set up a new firm nearby.

The Los Angeles Times (Pre-1997 Fulltext); Los
Angeles, Calif.; Aug 17, 1993; DON LEE; Abstract:
It was last year when the SEC initially suspected that
Brokers Investment was violating
securities law. In April the SEC alleged in Los
Angeles federal court that Shubert and
[Daniel H. Steinberg] were running a nationwide scam
in which Brokers Investment, along
with an obscure San Diego firm called U.S. Fiberline
Communications, defrauded investors
of at least $40 million by selling dubious investments
in telecommunications. The SEC said
Brokers' salesmen raised $109 million from 6,000
investors by reading sales scripts that
talked about annual returns of up to 32%, and that $40
million was pocketed or
fraudulently used by Shubert, Steinberg and others. [William Lawrence], in materials sent to former
clients of Brokers Investment, described
itself as a complete brokerage that deals in mutual
funds, stocks and other investments.
The brokerage was incorporated by Martin W. May in
1991 when he was head of sales
operations at Brokers Investment, papers from the
secretary of state and court
proceedings show. May, 42, is a third defendant in the
SEC's lawsuit against Brokers, and
is currently negotiating a separate settlement with
the SEC, the agency said. [Raymond H. Niesslein], 37, is a longtime associate of
Steinberg. Niesslein has not been
accused of any wrongdoing by the SEC in the Brokers
Investment case. Before joining
Brokers, he worked with Steinberg at a Canoga Park
brokerage selling oil and gas deals. In
1984, Niesslein and Steinberg were disciplined by
regulators in Wisconsin and California,
and without admitting or denying guilt, they agreed to
stop selling unregistered securities. Full Text:
(Copyright, The Times Mirror Company; Los Angeles
Times 1993all Rights reserved) Norman D. Shubert and Daniel H. Steinberg, accused by
the Securities and Exchange Commission in a
complaint filed in federal court last spring of
running a huge boiler-room operation in Woodland
Hills,
have agreed to a federal order that bars them from the
brokerage industry for life. The SEC order prohibits Shubert and Steinberg, both
Calabasas residents, from "association with any
broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer,
investment adviser or investment company." Shubert,
61, and
Steinberg, 37, signed the administrative order without
admitting or denying guilt, and it took effect July
29. Steinberg said the cost of fighting the SEC was one
reason he agreed to the ban. "I was left with few
alternatives." Steinberg now works at a memorabilia
business in Tarzana called American Legacy. "I'm
out of the securities industry." Shubert did not return telephone calls for this story. The SEC order is the latest, and strongest, regulatory
action against the former owners of now-defunct
Brokers Investment Corp. in Woodland Hills. And it may
have been prompted by reports that Shubert
and Steinberg have been involved with a new brokerage
called William Lawrence Securities, also in
Woodland Hills, which was formed by executives at
Brokers Investment as regulators were closing in
on that firm. It was last year when the SEC initially suspected that
Brokers Investment was violating securities law.
In April the SEC alleged in Los Angeles federal court
that Shubert and Steinberg were running a
nationwide scam in which Brokers Investment, along
with an obscure San Diego firm called U.S.
Fiberline Communications, defrauded investors of at
least $40 million by selling dubious investments in
telecommunications. The SEC said Brokers' salesmen
raised $109 million from 6,000 investors by
reading sales scripts that talked about annual returns
of up to 32%, and that $40 million was pocketed or
fraudulently used by Shubert, Steinberg and others. An SEC investigation is still determining how much
money is missing and where it went. Pending that
report, expected by year-end, the defendants could be
forced to make restitution to investors and pay
civil penalties. In April of this year, Shubert and Steinberg signed an
SEC consent order, without admitting or denying
guilt, promising not to sell unregistered securities
or break any other securities law. And under pressure
from the SEC, Brokers Investment shut down last
spring. But as Brokers was winding down its business early
this year, William Lawrence was setting up shop in
Woodland Hills, just down the street from where
Brokers once operated in Warner Center. When
William Lawrence opened for business in early spring,
Shubert had an office in the back of that
brokerage. Although Shubert and Steinberg had no official titles
at William Lawrence, they held a reception for its
opening, and Shubert attended regular meetings at the
new brokerage, according to an internal company
memo and former employees at William Lawrence. The
SEC, when asked about Shubert's presence at
William Lawrence earlier this summer, simply said he
should not be there. William Lawrence, in materials sent to former clients
of Brokers Investment, described itself as a
complete brokerage that deals in mutual funds, stocks
and other investments. The brokerage was
incorporated by Martin W. May in 1991 when he was head
of sales operations at Brokers Investment,
papers from the secretary of state and court
proceedings show. May, 42, is a third defendant in the
SEC's lawsuit against Brokers, and is currently
negotiating a separate settlement with the SEC, the
agency said. May was secretary and treasurer at William Lawrence,
but recently resigned from those posts and is
now working as a broker at William Lawrence, said
Raymond H. Niesslein, formerly senior vice
president at Brokers and now president of William
Lawrence. Niesslein confirmed that former Brokers Investment
personnel made the move to William Lawrence
early this year, taking with them some active accounts
and client lists from Brokers Investment.
Niesslein also said that Shubert had maintained an
office at William Lawrence. However, Niesslein said in an interview that Shubert
had moved out of William Lawrence's office in
early July and that Shubert now has no involvement
with the brokerage. Asked what Shubert had been
doing at William Lawrence's offices, Niesslein said,
"he had a lot of things he had to wind up, and we
allowed him to lease some office space." Niesslein added: "We have a lot of old baggage. We're
trying to eliminate it." It was Shubert who formed Brokers Investment in 1985
as a discount brokerage, and a couple of years
later Steinberg and Niesslein joined him. From 1989 to
mid-1992, Brokers sold mainly limited
partnerships that were supposed to be invested in U.S.
Fiberline's projects. Niesslein, 37, is a longtime associate of Steinberg.
Niesslein has not been accused of any wrongdoing by
the SEC in the Brokers Investment case. Before joining
Brokers, he worked with Steinberg at a Canoga
Park brokerage selling oil and gas deals. In 1984,
Niesslein and Steinberg were disciplined by regulators
in Wisconsin and California, and without admitting or
denying guilt, they agreed to stop selling
unregistered securities. But there are signs that regulators are now looking
into activities at William Lawrence, which is selling
some investment deals that were originally designed
and marketed by Brokers Investment. Complaints have been filed by investors with the
National Assn. of Securities Dealers-a regulatory
group based in Washington-involving William Lawrence.
The NASD typically investigates investor
complaints. Aaron Rose, a former William Lawrence broker, said a
compliance officer with the NASD last month
questioned him extensively about William Lawrence's
use of sales scripts-or prepared materials that are
read to potential investors. The NASD declined to comment on whether it was
investigating William Lawrence. But a regional
official at the NASD said it was responding to some
complaints from clients of William Lawrence. Rose and other former employees at William Lawrence
provided to The Times copies of scripts that
they said were furnished by managers at William
Lawrence. In one set of scripts, designed for a
boat-leasing deal called IBS Financial Partners,
brokers at William Lawrence were told to tell
potential
investors: "IBS is certain that they can place easily,
$4 million per month from April throughout the rest
of 1993 and can double that number in 1994. . . .
Based on these numbers" investors "could have three
times their investment in just two years." Such scripts, though marked "for training purposes
only," were read verbatim by salesmen, former
William Lawrence employees said. Earlier this month,
Michael Burnett, a Louisville, Ky., businessman
who is an IBS director, confirmed that IBS, which is a
start-up operation, has yet to produce any
revenue. NASD rules strictly prohibit presenting
optimistic or unrealistic forecasts about investments. Niesslein, the president of William Lawrence,
acknowledged the existence of such sales scripts, but
said
that in the last month he had discarded them and is
instructing brokers at William Lawrence not to read
training materials over the phone. "We know where
Brokers Investment got in trouble and don't want to
repeat their mistakes," Niesslein said. Finding investors for the IBS partnership was
originally handled by Brokers Investment and then was
marketed by William Lawrence, Niesslein said.
According to the prospectus, IBS, a
Nevada-incorporated business formed partly by Shubert
and Steinberg, signs agreements with boat
manufacturers. In turn, the boat makers agree to lease
boats to people through IBS, for which IBS
receives certain fees. The prospectus, dated in
February, said Shubert and Steinberg are general
partners in IBS, meaning they are part of the
management team and entitled to benefit from the
performance of the business. Burnett said Shubert and Steinberg resigned as general
partners of the business last spring, although
they remain minority shareholders. But the change has
not yet been recorded with the secretary of
state's office in California, which such partnerships
must do within 30 days of the change. Burnett said
failure to record the management change was an
"oversight" and that it is now being addressed. Shubert, as recently as June, was also soliciting
money from investors for another deal that Brokers
sold
late last year, according to letters sent out to
potential investors. That deal was designed to raise
more
than $1 million to finance a firm called Berleca USA,
which wanted to market apparel using the
Coca-Cola name under a license agreement with the
beverage company. According to the prospectus, Berleca is partly owned
by Shubert, and the program is managed by
Sovereign Capital Group of Las Vegas, which is also
owned by Shubert and was the managing partner
of some Fiberline deals. Coca-Cola, based in Atlanta,
declined to comment. In a letter dated June 8, Shubert told investors that
Berleca was not performing well, and he concluded
by saying: "Should any of you have the ability and the
interest in providing bridge financing to Berleca,
please contact Warner Capital Group, their investment
banker." State records show Warner Capital is owned by Thomas
Shubert, Norman Shubert's son. Warner
Capital operates in the back end of William Lawrence's
offices. Niesslein said Thomas Shubert, who also previously
worked at Brokers Investment, was not involved in
any way with William Lawrence. Thomas Shubert refused
to comment. [Illustration]
PHOTO: Office of William Lawrence Securities, which
opened near Brokers Investment in Woodland Hills. /
Los
Angeles Times; PHOTO: Daniel H. Steinberg and Norman
D. Shubert, former owners of now-defunct Brokers
Investment Corp., pictured on VICA magazine cover. Sub Title:
[Valley Edition]
Start Page:
4
ISSN:
04583035



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/9/2004 4:55:13 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Suit Says Ernst and UBS Knew of HealthSouth Fraud
By GRETCHEN MORGENSON and REED ABELSON

Published: January 9, 2004


ealthSouth's outside auditors and investment bankers knew of fraudulent accounting at the company long before financial problems came to light last year, according to a lawsuit filed yesterday on behalf of stock and bond investors.

The suit, filed in United States District Court in the Northern District of Alabama, contends that Ernst & Young, HealthSouth's former accounting firm, and UBS Warburg, its former investment banker, were aware of fraud at the company even as they signed its financial statements and sold HealthSouth securities to the public.

The investors filing the suit bought HealthSouth stock and bonds from 1998 to 2002.

Richard M. Scrushy, the founder and former chief executive of HealthSouth, was indicted last fall on 85 criminal counts that accuse him of inflating profits by $2.74 billion from 1996 to 2002. He has denied any role in the misconduct. In the nine months since the financial problems came to light, 15 former HealthSouth executives have pleaded guilty to manipulating the company's financial results.

The Alabama Retirement Systems, the lead plaintiff in the HealthSouth bondholder litigation, invested $35 million in the company's bonds and lost half that investment when the HealthSouth fraud was disclosed, said John P. Coffey, a lawyer at Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann in New York who represents the Alabama pension fund.

"It is especially appalling that at the same time UBS bankers were urging investors to buy HealthSouth bonds, their own internal documents show that UBS considered HealthSouth to be a 'borderline' credit risk with a declining business model,'' Mr. Coffey said. "And the bank even conditioned loaning money to HealthSouth on an internal decision to reduce the bank's credit exposure in months, if not weeks, after setting up the credit facility."

The lawsuit's accusations that HealthSouth's investment bankers and auditors knew about the fraudulent accounting is attributed to an unidentified former senior HealthSouth executive who was involved in the fraud.

As early as 1994, according to the lawsuit, Ernst & Young knew HealthSouth was overstating earnings. As the accounting firm concluded its audit of the company's 1993 financial statements, the lawsuit said, a partner overseeing the account told a senior executive of HealthSouth to agree to a particular accounting treatment because Ernst & Young had looked the other way on $27 million in overstated earnings.

"The allegation is based on an unattributed quote, which we have no reason to believe is accurate,'' a spokesman for Ernst & Young, Charles Perkins, said. "The problems at HealthSouth were the direct result of former management at the company, and Ernst & Young should not be included in the lawsuit."

Ernst & Young auditors who signed off on the company's financial reports year after year have previously said that they believed the results, though five chief financial officers at HealthSouth have since said they were lies.

The lawsuit also contends that from 1999 through the fall of 2002, a UBS investment banker had regular conversations about the fraud at HealthSouth with a former company executive who had taken part.

The discussions involved the likelihood of criminal prosecution and the penalties that could result against both of them, the suit contends.

Benjamin D. Lorello, a managing director of UBS Securities and head of its health care banking group, was also aware of the fraud at HealthSouth, the complaint contends. Nevertheless, UBS helped the company arrange a string of acquisitions, sold billions of dollars of HealthSouth securities to investors and issued glowing research reports on the company, it added.

Indeed, the lawsuit contends, UBS documents show that in 2000, as the bank was negotiating to provide HealthSouth with a $687 million credit line, the bank considered the company to be "borderline." And in 2002, UBS documents indicate that while the firm was willing to approve a $120 million loan to HealthSouth, the bank's credit risk committee recommended reducing its exposure to $50 million of the loan after six months.

"Whilst we have not reviewed the claim in detail, as we have said previously, we have no reason to believe that anyone at UBS had any knowledge of the fraud at HealthSouth," Mark Arena, a UBS spokesman, said. "We believe any claim that UBS had knowledge of the fraud is without merit and UBS will defend itself vigorously against any such claim."

Howard Capek, who followed HealthSouth as a research analyst at UBS, is also named in the suit. It contends that in 2001, as Mr. Capek recommended HealthSouth shares to the firm's clients, he acknowledged to a business acquaintance that the company had accounted improperly for its expenses.

Thomas Fitzpatrick, Mr. Capek's lawyer, described the accusations against Mr. Capek as "totally baseless, as far as I know, and indeed libelous."

Mr. Lorello's lawyer, Robert J. Anello, said, "Mr. Lorello did not have any knowledge of the fraud at HealthSouth."

Mr. Lorello testified last year at a Congressional hearing on HealthSouth that he "was not aware of and did not suspect that anyone at HealthSouth was engaged in improprieties.''



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/9/2004 6:55:21 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
ALWAYS MORE TO COME GOELO. MUCH MUCH MORE.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/9/2004 7:10:47 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Francois+Goelo SAID: I spoke to Allen Wolfson after reading your post... He believes the 10K will come out today or tomorrow and the 10Q early next week... They've been frustrated with their Auditors and have hired another one...

He said they're doing large amounts of filing for themselves, 28 subsidiaries and their clients and have a record of not being past the extension date, but clearly, in this case, they've slipped up badly... However, I continue to give them the benefit of the doubt, as I feel there is far to much potential here, not to do so...

JMHO, F. Goelo + + +



By: Francois+Goelo
Reply To: 911 by apapada Wednesday, 3 May 2000 at 10:49 AM EDT
Post # of 1746

Apapada, I understand you feel betrayed....

by management but you may be over-reacting... I spoke to Allen Wolfson after reading your post... He believes the 10K will come out today or tomorrow and the 10Q early next week... They've been frustrated with their Auditors and have hired another one...

He said they're doing large amounts of filing for themselves, 28 subsidiaries and their clients and have a record of not being past the extension date, but clearly, in this case, they've slipped up badly... However, I continue to give them the benefit of the doubt, as I feel there is far to much potential here, not to do so...

JMHO, F. Goelo + + +



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/10/2004 2:13:27 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
NOW KNIGHT TRADING GIVES AMEX THE OL' HEAVE-HO

By JENNY ANDERSON
nypost.com 

January 10, 2004 -- Another major trading firm has abandoned its equity-option trading business on the American Stock Exchange.
Jersey City-based Knight Trading announced yesterday it would close its operations for trading 74 equity options on the Amex on Jan. 30.

Knight is the fourth firm to abandon some or all of its business on the Amex in recent months.

Timber Hill announced it would leave in November, blaming the Amex's poor technology.

Van Der Moolen closed its floor operations on the Philadelphia Stock Exchange as well as the Amex and Goldman Sach's Spear Leeds Kellogg unit sold 12 products in a process a spokesman referred to as an "ongoing rationalization" of its business at the Amex.

Knight's departure comes as the options market is in flux, with electronic markets like the International Securities Exchange stealing market share from floor based systems like the Amex, which operate with humans and computers.

An option is a contract that gives the purchaser the right to buy or sell a stock, index-product or exchange-traded fund for a set price.



"The options markets are quickly evolving," said David Harris, SVP Director of Strategic Planning at the Amex. "We are addressing firms' needs by rolling out ANTE, our new trading platform, and providing cheap and fast executions," he said.

Amex has lost significant equity-options market share over the past two years.

In 2002, the Amex traded 25.9 percent of all equity contracts according to the Options Clearing Corporation - making it second behind the Chicago Board Options Exchange. In 2003, the Amex traded 21.2 percent, third place behind the CBOE and the electronic-based International Securities Exchange.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/10/2004 4:06:22 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Teen's spam operation allegedly used in fraud
E-mails netted private information
By HARVEY RICE
Copyright 2004 Houston Chronicle
Jan. 9, 2004, 11:33PM


Three men who pleaded guilty to credit card fraud Friday gleaned consumer information through an e-mail spam operation run by a Dallas teenager, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office.

The teen created a spam, or junk e-mail, computer program that generated thousands of messages purporting to be from America Online and asking for confidential information, Assistant U.S. Attorney Nancy Herrera said.

The teenager relayed the information to Jason Michael Carpenter, 20, of Houston, who pleaded guilty to fraud charges along with Michael Scott Pesce, 27, of Selden, N,Y., and Bernard Duzinski, 43, of Port Richey, Fla., Herrera said.

Herrera said she could not furnish more information about the teen or his spam operation. Officials in the Dallas County attorney's office, which usually prosecutes juveniles, were unavailable for comment.

The number of victims and amount they lost had not been made public, but Herrera said money taken in the scheme was expected to total at least hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Carpenter sent the consumer information gathered by spam to Jonathan Riches of Holiday, Fla., who, along with Stephanie Costley Doyle of the same city, pleaded guilty last year to participating in the scheme.

Riches used the information to order new credit cards, and Pesce and Duzinski provided him with fake driver's licenses in the credit card victims' names. The bogus licenses were made from a Texas license template sent by Carpenter, Herrera said.

U.S. District Judge Melinda Harmon is scheduled to sentence the three men in April.

Carpenter faces up to 15 years in prison for conspiracy to commit wire fraud and fraud in connection with access devices. Pesce could received up to 30 years in prison for wire fraud, and Duzinski up to three years for fraud in connection with documents.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/11/2004 1:27:24 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
GOELO, THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT YOU AGAIN:

By: flops5
11 Jan 2004, 02:55 AM EST
Msg. 13582 of 13589
(This msg. is a reply to 13579 by eagle_2975.)
Jump to msg. #

Jens was exactly right. These are crooks from start to finish. They will lie to anybody to make a buck with no regard for who they hurt.

We are talking scum, it is in the genes and passed down from one generation to the next.

Call the SEC and report if you were sold shares by these scumbags. Call the SEC and report the solicitations made by Markow in conference calls or individually. Call the SEC and direct them to this site and sites of the other company frauds Markow was hyping on these boards.

Call your state security divisions and report your stories. Write, email or call the NASD where Markow already has a cease and desist order against him. Call, write or email the state of CA where he has another order against him.

On this and numerous others he stuck you with zero after selling to you throughout his hype phase. Now he walks away with cash and shares even after he has cashed out bigtime. You got taken to the cleaners and are just sitting there while he fills his bank account with your money. Stand up you fools and make him pay for screwing you royally with his lies and deception.

Yes Markow knew from the start right to the end Dr. Lee NEVER agreed to be a board member but told all of you the opposite. He knew there was never a $20 million deposit made on SHPS but told all you the opposite. Guess where all the shares were coming from while his posters were telling you nobody was selling and that it was marketmakers shorting the stock. SUCKERS you were buying his and his accomplishes stock all the time.

Get off your as-ses and call email or write the SEC, the NASD and the states or sit there like dunces while he walks off and spends all your money.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/11/2004 4:10:34 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
F. Goelo + + + CONCLUSION: Based on the foregoing, I expect continued Growth to translate into about $2.50 to $3.00 EPS for 2000, listing on AMEX and a potential Forward Split... Initial target: $10.00... End of Year Target: $30.00+

JMHO, F. Goelo + + +


o:Al's Fun who wrote (89)
From: Francois Goelo Saturday, May 6, 2000 11:18 PM
View Replies (6) | Respond to of 149

► CYAA: HIGHLIGHTS of the SEC REPORT for 1999...
biz.yahoo.com 

PORTFOLIO:

The Company's portfolio consists primarily of restricted and unrestricted shares of common stock in micro to small cap publicly traded companies. This portfolio currently consists of shares of common in over 70 different companies whose operations range from that of high-tech Internet operations to oil and gas companies. The Company believes that the diversity of its current holdings is such that the overall volatility of its portfolio is significantly less than in prior years of operations. The Company generally books securities that it accepts as payment at a 25% to 75% discount of the current market value at the time the Company accepts the securities due to illiquidity of the securities because of restrictions on resale.

FINANCIAL CONSULTING:

Revenues from the Company's financial consulting operations increased for the year ended December 31, 1999. The Company recorded $3,822,117 in revenues for the year ended December 31, 1999, from its financial consulting operations as compared to $996,447 for the same period of 1998. This increase was due to an increase in the number of clients that retained the Company during the year ended December 31, 1999 coupled with an increase in revenues from the sale of securities previously received as payment for services rendered.

REVENUE AND EARNINGS:

Gross revenues for December 31, 1999 and 1998 were $6,858,784 and $4,189,634 respectively. Gross revenues for the year ended December 31, 1999 increased 64% over December 31, 1998. This is due to a $2,825,670 increase in financial consulting and a $235,018 increase in rental revenues in 1999 as compared to 1998. The net profit as a percentage increased by 786% for December 31, 1999 over December 31, 1998. The Company recorded a net profit of $3,624,067 compared to a net profit of $408,984 for December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The Company's improvement in profitability is largely attributable to the increase in consulting. Additionally, the Company realized a gain from the sale of investment securities of $698,759 in 1999 as compared to gain from the sale of investment securities of $375,323 in 1998.

CAPITAL RESOURCES and LIQUIDITY:

At December 31, 1999, the Company had current assets of $6,019,507 and total assets of $17,726,261 as compared to $2,777,442 and $12,594,655, respectively at December 31, 1998. The Company had net working capital of $3,831,190 at December 31, 1999 compared to a working capital deficit of $1,410,156 at December 31, 1998. Net stockholders' equity in the Company was $7,473,761 as of December 31, 1999, compared to $3,381,184 as of December 31, 1998.

GROWTH OF ASSETS AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY:

ASSETS: Securities available for sale in 1999: $3,970,445... in 1998: $937,282....

TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY: 1999 @ $7,473,761... 1998 @ $3,381,184

FUTURE:

The Company expects increases in expenses through 2000 as the Company steps up its effort to acquire additional properties and continues to grow its consulting businesses.

CONCLUSION: Based on the foregoing, I expect continued Growth to translate into about $2.50 to $3.00 EPS for 2000, listing on AMEX and a potential Forward Split... Initial target: $10.00... End of Year Target: $30.00+

JMHO, F. Goelo + + +



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/12/2004 9:10:13 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Flight Safety Discloses SEC Probe
1/12/2004

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Flight Safety Technologies Inc. <FSFY.OB> <FLST.OB> said on Monday the Securities and Exchange Commission is conducting an informal investigation that may be focused on unspecified analyst reports and press releases.

The SEC has not said the company acted improperly or illegally, said the company which develops technology to monitor airplane wake turbulence. Flight Safety is cooperating with the investigation, the company said in a release.

Company representatives were not immediately available for comment.

Shares of the company, which trade on the over-the-counter Nasdaq bulletin board, fell $1.61, or 25 percent, to $4.89. More than 182,000 shares traded, more than three times its 30-day average trading volume.

© Copyright 2004 Reuters. Reuters content is the intellectual property of Reuters or its third-party content providers. Any copying, republication, or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/12/2004 11:40:57 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
SCORE ONE->Posted by: Francois+Goelo In reply to: knot_4_sail who wrote msg# 1 Date:8/26/2000 3:46:42 PM
Post #of 103


¶¶ (Re-post from RB)... Thread: IMPORTANT NOTICE to ALL...

A NEW THREAD has been opened for SCRO on Investorhub.com, as a result of the unwillingness of RB's Management to effectively POLICE the various BASHERS, MAULERS, CRAZIES and others SPAMMERS roaming on its Boards...

investorshub.com 

In addition, RB has NEGLECTED our long standing requests for:

+ The ability to quickly delete disgusting posts, those violating privacy, those Bashing with no reasonable reason and those endless Spamming posts, that seem to make about 25% of all posts here at present...

+ The ability to edit a post for a few minutes after it has been posted, to correct last minute embarrassing Mistakes or check that a Link posted is actually working...

+ The personal notification that a post has been addressed to us and awaits a reply, instead of having to scan all messages on numerous Threads to see if anything has been posted to our attention...

+ The ability to have Proper Headers, that can be edited, as information change and appear every time a post is clicked on to remind the poster what the Thread is all about...

+ The ability to send and receive Private Messages (PM's), as on SI, for communications with friends, away from the public eye...

All these FEATURES and MORE, are available on Investorshub.com, a Message Board designed and Operated by Posting Investors FOR other Posting Investors... It is a SELF-REGULATING Board where the person starting the Thread is charged with policing it and can, with the assistance of nominees, DELETE any OFFENSIVE post IMMEDIATELY!...

RB is NOT BOTHERING to CORRECT any or all the existing PROBLEMS mentioned above, so, I and many other well known and respected posters PLAN to move to this NEW Message Board and will maintain only a token presence on RB, if any... When SI became the Garden of Eden for Bashers and Shorters due to Management BIAS, we moved over to RB... Now that the same problem is showing here on RB, we're ready to move again...

POSTERS MAKE RB or SI, NOT the OTHER WAY ROUND!!!

JMHO, F. Goelo + + +


investorshub.com 



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/12/2004 11:45:17 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
"Dear SCRO POSTERS, a WARM WELCOME on INVESTORSHUB.COM..."
investorshub.com 

Posted by: Francois+Goelo
In reply to: None Date:8/28/2000 2:47:31 PM
Post #of 103


Dear SCRO POSTERS, a WARM WELCOME on INVESTORSHUB.COM...

This Board will essentially be AUTO-REGULATING, as I believe that the Spammers, Bashers and other Crazies won't even bother to post frequently, as they know they can be QUICKLY DELETED by the person who has started the Board...

I REALLY LIKE this Message Board, because it has CLEARLY been designed by Posting-Investors (my Buddy Fatt Matt) for Posting-Investors and all the GRIPES I had with SI or RB have been COMPLETELY RESOLVED... Shortly, we'll get CONTENT, Portfolios and QUOTES and you'll soon wonder if you need another Board... I predict that this Message Board will expand tremendously, as the word gets around...

As happened when I moved from SI to RB, I posted on the 2 Boards for a while, then recently 95% of my posting was on RB... Soon, I believe 95% of my posting will be on investorshub.com, BUT I plan to maintain a presence on RB for a while longer... Here is a list of the ADVANTAGES I see with investorshub.com, compared to RB:

+ The ability to quickly delete disgusting posts, those violating privacy, those Bashing with no reasonable cause and those endless Spamming posts, that seem to make about 25% of all posts on RB at present... Critical posts are of course Welcome...

+ The ability to edit a post for a few minutes after it has been posted, to correct last minute embarrassing Mistakes or check that a Link posted is actually working...

+ The personal notification that a post has been addressed to me and awaits a reply, instead of having to scan all messages on numerous Threads to see if anything has been posted to my attention...

+ The ability to have Proper Headers, that can be edited, as information change and appear every time a post is clicked on to remind the poster what the Thread is all about...

+ The ability to send and receive Private Messages (PM's), as on SI, for communications with friends, away from the public eye...

+ The current SPEED and the large dimensions of the window to compose messages without having to constantly SCROLL...

+ The RECEPTIVITY of this Management: it knows this Board ONLY EXIST through us, the POSTERS and I believe they'll do all they can to accommodate our NEEDS, within reason... We're NOT dealing with a COLD and IRRESPONSIVE Corporate Structure here, BUT with People JUST LIKE US...

SO BEST of LUCK to SCRO and investorshub.com....

JMHO, F. Goelo + + +



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/12/2004 11:48:39 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
">In conclusion, invest WISELY, meaning no more than you can afford to Lose...."

Posted by: Francois+Goelo
In reply to: None Date:8/29/2000 10:38:37 AM
Post #of 103


¶ I Believe that SCRO is POISED to do very WELL,...

as many investors have finally realized that electronic Component manufacturing and assembling WILL GROW at roughly the same pace as the INTERNET, BUT unlike most Internet Companies, they are very PROFITABLE... The TREND is now OUTSOURCING, particularly in inexpensive Asia and I don't see that being reversed any time soon... Witness the last Polaroid Deal, heralding more American Companies ready to do Business with SCRO...

Here is the DD showing how the average PE of 71 is obtained for SCRO's PEERS: I have reviewed it and find the Demo very Credible... In fact, SCRO with only 11 in PE is now undervalued by a factor of some 6.5... There is NO DOUBT in my mind that SCRO is worth $15.00+ and should get there when year end results are announced... I also believe that it'll GROW FASTER and will be far more PROFITABLE (18.5% NET in 1999) than FLEX, for example, which has a Huge Quarterly Loss and a PE of 106... It's temporarily at bargain price because of the manipulation of a few shorting MM's...

ragingbull.altavista.com 

>In conclusion, invest WISELY, meaning no more than you can afford to Lose....

ragingbull.altavista.com 

JMHO, F. Goelo + + +



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/12/2004 11:50:44 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
MORE COMING YOUR WAY GOELO. REPORT, REPORT REPORT THEY SAY.

THEY ARE BUILDING A SPECIAL RING OF FIRE IN HADES FOR THIS KIND

WAITING FOR GOELO'S JUDGMENT DAY!!

THETRUTHSEEKER



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/14/2004 2:01:11 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
PENNY STOCK BAR - INTERNET FRAUDSTER LUIS LORIE

Luis F. Lorie, of Miami, Florida, has been barred from participating in
an offering of penny stock. Thus, he is prohibited from engaging in any
activities related to the issuance, purchase, or sale of such
speculative low-priced securities. The sanction was based on his felony
conviction and injunction and was ordered in an administrative
proceeding before an administrative law judge.

Lorie was convicted of securities fraud and permanently enjoined from
committing further violations of the securities laws. He is currently
serving a fifty-one month prison term. Lorie orchestrated a pump-and-
dump scheme using false and misleading postings on the Internet to
create a market for the stock of American Healthcare Providers, Inc., a
start-up company with no business operations. Lorie and his family
reaped over $1.4 million from the scheme. (Rel. 34-49073; File No. 3-
11355)



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/14/2004 6:54:28 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Guilty plea in investment fraud case

Glenmont resident Anthony Granito has pleaded guilty in Rensselaer County Court to three felony charges stemming from what state prosecutors called a phony investment scheme.


Granito, a former employee of the Cortland-based McNeil & Co. insurance agency, persuaded 16 people to invest $1.9 million in a fictitious Massachusetts Volunteer Fireman's Fund, according to state Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, whose office prosecuted the case.

Granito, 65, entered the pleas on Jan. 14 before Judge Patrick McGrath. He pleaded guilty to two-counts of grand larceny in the second degree, a class "C" felony; and scheming to defraud in the first degree, a class "E" felony.

"This case clearly demonstrates that financial fraud can occur on Main Street just as easily as on Wall Street," Spitzer said in a written statement

The scam began in 1993. Granito was an active member of regional and statewide associations involved with volunteer emergency services and used those contacts to met investors.

According to Spitzer's office, Granito told the investors that the funds would pay annual tax-free interest of up to 25 percent. His victims were told to make their checks out to him personally and he would redeposit them.

In 2003 he declared bankruptcy. He finally admitted he had not invested the clients' money and the fund he promoted didn't exist.

Granito will be sentenced on March 3, 2004.



© 2004 American City Business Journals Inc.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/14/2004 10:03:00 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
AMEX AS 'PENNY LANE' By CHRISTOPHER BYRON


LOWERING THE BAR
The American Stock Exchange has slashed listing standards so much that some 40% of its 802 stock listings are now penny stocks.

February 24, 2003 -- AS everyone knows, affirmative action is supposedly about caring and nurturing - but it's really about making people feel demeaned and put down.

Who can possibly feel proud about winning at anything when everyone else in the race finishes first as well?

That's why I say to the American Stock Exchange, "Enough with the pass/fail stuff, OK? If you guys keep lowering the bar until every cheeseball company in the Western World can make the cut, you're going to end up with an exchange that no self-respecting company will want to belong to at all."

These and several other related thoughts came to mind last week when I read a story in the Financial Times that the latest round of efforts to sell the AMEX has fallen through, and that not even the Hong Kong Stock Exchange now wants to buy it.

When the exchange was first put on the block two years ago, the asking price was believed to be more than $700 million. Now the FT reports that there are no takers at $100 million.

So let's go behind the curtain and ask the big question: Why? Is business on Wall Street really that terrible?

Well, frankly, I think there's more to the AMEX's woes than just a bear market. Beyond the exchange's financial problems, I think the AMEX has a bad case of public image cooties.

For all its efforts to prettify itself as the nation's "third-largest stock exchange," the AMEX has never really been able to shake its past as Wall Street's original penny-stock bazaar.

Latest evidence of same: some recent news, exhumed from the Federal Register, that the AMEX has now received permission from the Securities and Exchange Commission to provide the equivalent of a Casey Martin golf cart to any AMEX-listed company that can't keep up on the pro circuit without one. Specifically, any company that has nuked its balance sheet and the equity of its stockholders can now count on the AMEX to focus instead on benchmarks like assets, revenues and market capitalization when deciding whether or not to let the company remain an Amex-listed stock.

The reason cited for the rule change? That lots of companies now have to lug around worthless balance sheets as a result of what happened back in those terrible old 1990s - so why should the AMEX be forced, by some silly, archaic concept like "shareholder equity," to discriminate against the era's true victims: those desperately needy, failing companies? And geez, added the exchange in its rule-change submission, the NYSE has a provision like that in its listings requirements, so why can't we?

SOUNDS good to me. In fact, it makes me want to rise up and cry, "Won't you please help? Become an AMEX corporate sponsor! Don't throw away that used goodwill! Just $50,000 a month in R&D intangibles can feed and clothe an entire boardroom of CEOs in need!"

It's too bad Mr. Salvatore Sodano - the chairman of the exchange's board of governors - didn't see the opportunity staring him in the face in all this. He could have set an example that investors all across America are aching to applaud. How about someone on Wall Street actually raising the bar for a change? How about some dumbing up? Show us by example what we've all known instinctively from the start - that personal best brings no satisfaction if the pursuit of fulfillment involves a race to the bottom.

Alas, the AMEX could talk the talk, but it couldn't walk the walk. So we got a convincing "Enough's enough" harrumph from Sodano on my friend Neil Cavuto's Fox News TV show a year ago, as the AMEX chairman insisted, in the spirit of the moment, that we've simply got to clean up the mess on Wall Street. Yet after a decent interval has elapsed, that sentiment has found expression in the exchange itself now dialing down its listing standards to the point where not even outright balance-sheet insolvency can be justification for throwing a company off the AMEX.

One despairs at such moments. Where was the AMEX board of governors in this? Why didn't they rise as one from their lawn chairs and declare, "Now see here, let us for once take the high road to Loch Lomond!"

BUT of course they did not - and so the eq uity listings on the AMEX will continue to grow just a little bit trashier and more toxic with each passing day. As of Friday, for example, 191 of the AMEX's companies failed to meet at least one of the exchange's own standards for continued listing - though they have to be in violation of them all before action is even considered. Similarly, roughly 40 percent of the 802 equity securities now listed on the AMEX qualify under SEC rules as official penny stocks - and have to be labeled as such in the companies' financial reports to the public?

Here are three such beauties, each sporting the distinctive tire marks of AMEX roadkill:

Diomed Holdings Inc.: I warned about Diomed in this space nearly a year ago, when the stock was trading north of $8 per share. The company had no net income, and no operating cash flow.

What it did have was something called "innovative clinical modalities [for] minimal and micro-invasive medical procedures." Whatever they are, not enough people seem to want them - because revenues have dropped by a third since I first wrote about the company, and losses remain huge. Worse still, negative cash flow from operations has soared 10-fold, and insiders have begun cashing out.

Meanwhile, the stock has plunged to 19 cents per share. But it's still available, winking at the johns like a Hamburg hooker - on the AMEX.

Xcelera Inc.: This company, handily domiciled in the Cayman Islands, holds what must be the all-time record for stock price appreciation on any U.S. exchange: a 70,000 percent run-up, from pennies per share to more than $110, at the peak of the dot-com mania. The company achieved this by buying the rights to some kind of secret sauce that was supposed to make the Internet run faster, then vamping it around Wall Street.

Since then, however, revenues have collapsed by 70 percent from their 1999 peak, and they now stand at a mere $3.1 million for 2002. By contrast, losses for the year totaled $96.3 million. Meanwhile, the company's stock is back where it started: 70 cents per share, waiting to take the next load of gullible investors on a round-trip ride to nowhere - on the AMEX.

World Wireless Corp.: This company is supposedly in the "wired and wireless communications products, systems and technology" business. With nothing but losses to show for its efforts, the company nonetheless got its shares listed for trading on the AMEX in 1999. The shares thereupon promptly collapsed, tumbling from a high of just under $8 at the start of 2000 to a current price of nine cents.

Meanwhile, the number of total shares outstanding has nearly tripled since trading on the AMEX began, even as revenues have all but vanished, totaling just $15,000 for the nine months through last September. The company has no working capital, all shareholder equity has been wiped out, and the entire business is being propped up by a struggling New York hedge fund.

Yet there the shares sit, waiting for the next hot new thing in the telecom space to set them afire again - on the AMEX.

I think it is companies such as these (and they are hardly the only ones like them on the AMEX) that help cause would-be buyers of the exchange to turn away. Who wants to buy a hospital ward for the terminally ill, anyway - especially when the medical charts at the foot of the beds all read, Prognosis: Great!

Bottom line: Life ain't limbo, and the name of the game never was "how low can you go?" - except, it would seem, on the AMEX.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/14/2004 10:16:33 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
State Securities Regulators Release Top 10 Scams, Schemes & Scandals

Mutual Fund Practices, Senior Investment Fraud,

Variable Annuities Join 2004 List

WASHINGTON, Jan. 14 /PRNewswire/ -- State securities regulators today forecast that investors will be challenged with increasingly complex and confusing investment frauds and identified the Top 10 schemes investors are likely to see in 2004. New to the North American Securities Administrators Association's (NASAA) annual survey of state securities enforcement officials are mutual fund practices, senior investment fraud, and variable annuities.

"Investors face a complex maze of scams, schemes and scandals," said Ralph A. Lambiase, NASAA's president and director of the Connecticut Division of Securities. "Our fight against fraud never stops because each year con artists discover new ways to fleece the public. Sadly, many of the age-old scams still work to cheat victims of their hard-earned savings as well. It pays to remember that if an investment opportunity sounds too good to be true, it usually is."

Investors lose billions of dollars annually to investment fraud, Lambiase said. He cautioned that investors must remain vigilant in the fight against investment fraud. "All securities regulators, whether local, state, or federal, share the common goal of protecting investors," he said. "I urge legislators to help us continue to do our jobs by ensuring that regulators have sufficient resources to protect our citizens."

The following ranking of NASAA's Top 10 scams, schemes and scandals for 2004 is based on the order of prevalence and seriousness as identified by state securities regulators: 1) Ponzi Schemes, 2) Senior Investment Fraud, 3) Promissory Notes, 4) Unscrupulous Broker/Dealer Representatives, 5) Affinity Fraud, 6) Insurance Agent Securities Fraud, 7) Prime Bank/High-Yield Investment Schemes, 8) Internet Fraud, 9) Mutual Fund Business Practices, 10) Variable Annuities.

Lambiase also announced that NASAA has created an interactive Fraud Center on its website (www.nasaa.org). The center features details of NASAA's Top 10 scams, schemes and scandals; tips on how to detect con artists and avoid becoming a victim; an Investor "Bill of Rights;" instructions on how to file an investment-related complaint; and contact information for each state securities regulator. "Education and awareness are an investor's best defense against fraud," Lambiase said.

SOURCE North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc.

CO: North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc.; NASAA

ST: District of Columbia

SU: PDT

Web site: nasaa.org 

prnewswire.com 


01/14/2004 12:05 EST

Copyright © 1996-2004 PR Newswire Association LLC. All rights reserved.



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (10156)1/15/2004 1:00:13 PM
From: StockDungRespond to of 19401
 
Palmieri gets 30 years for insurance fraud scheme

By Rachel Laing
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

January 14, 2004

A judge sentenced a San Diego businessman to 30 years in prison yesterday for bilking 191 mostly elderly investors out of $13 million in an elaborate insurance fraud scheme.

Carmen John Palmieri pleaded no contest in November to 144 counts of insurance fraud, grand theft and elder abuse in a complex fraud in which Palmieri sold nonexistent viatical settlement contracts, promising a 14 percent return over a 12-month period.

A viatical settlement contract is the sale of a life insurance contract by a terminally ill person for a portion of the policy's face value. They are often bought by entrepreneurs who pool the policies and sell them as a relatively safe, high-yield investment.

But Palmieri never actually bought viaticals. Instead, he took the seniors' money and invested it in risky real estate ventures, according to prosecutors. Forensic accountants could not find the money, which Palmieri said he poured into failed real estate ventures.

The case came to light in 2001, when victims who weren't receiving the promised payouts – or who got checks that bounced – complained to the Department of Insurance, which launched an investigation with the San Diego District Attorney's Office.

In March 2002, law enforcement officials descended on Palmieri's home, businesses and storage units, ultimately seizing information from more than 60 bank accounts tied to Palmieri.

Investigators said the scam was so well-executed that even investors who conducted considerable due diligence on the operation found nothing amiss. Palmieri set up what appeared to be an independent title company, Trust Management Services, where investors' money was supposedly deposited into an insured escrow account. The company's address, however, was a post-office box at a San Francisco Mail Boxes Etc. store.

Palmieri also attained a state license to sell viaticals, and his National Medical Funding advertised in gay publications soliciting terminal AIDS patients to apply for viatical contracts.

While the firm never actually purchased the viaticals, Palmieri used terminally ill patients' insurance information from the applications to create false contracts that would appear to check out if investors looked into them.

The scam was "one of the most audacious and fearsome financial frauds I've seen in my 27 years in public life," said Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi, who attended part of the all-day hearing.

Judge Frank A. Brown heard testimony from about 50 of Palmieri's victims, who described the dramatic impact losing their retirement savings in the scam had on their lives, health and families.

Most of the victims were retirees from Arizona who invested their entire nest egg in what Palmieri touted as a risk-free venture.

The stories included a couple who invested $100,000 in the hopes of using the returns to pay medical bills for the husband's lung cancer battle; a father who would have used the $150,000 he lost to pay for his daughter's kidney transplant, but had to pass up an available matching kidney because he couldn't afford the operation; and others who were left destitute in their 70s and 80s after the investment wiped out their life's savings.

"I feel that if he's not given the maximum (sentence) that we've been betrayed for a second time, this time by our government," victim Graham Wolms said.

Palmieri, who had a successful mortgage business and was a millionaire when he started the scam, asked the court to forgo prison time and give him closely supervised probation so that he could restart his mortgage business and earn back investors' money.

Two of Palmieri's pastors from his North County church pleaded for leniency on his behalf, saying the defendant was a good husband and father who was in a lot of pain over what he did.

Judge Brown was unmoved by Palmieri's plan to provide restitution, saying he did not sense true remorse from the defendant and that he believed he would scam again if given the opportunity.

"I don't think he gets it," Brown said. "I think he feels his pain, but he doesn't feel their pain."

Brown called Palmieri's actions "evil" but said he did not hand down the maximum sentence of 60 years because Palmieri had a clean record and Brown "didn't want it to be a death sentence."



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rachel Laing: (619) 293-2022; Rachel.Laing@uniontrib.com


Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.