Technology Stocks | Microvision (MVIS)


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: vpelt who wrote (5842)12/31/2003 11:00:13 AM
From: JDN   of 7340
 
That would be nice, I have to drink about 12 cups of coffee a day to stay awake anymore. jdn

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: toby cyr who started this subject12/31/2003 5:50:23 PM
From: tktrimbath   of 7340
 
my informal semi-annual synopsis of MVIS

INTRODUCTION
My semi-annual stock synopses are a task I give myself every six months where I review for myself our stocks. This is not a proclamation of truth but a chance for me to record my thoughts, pass them along, and learn from others who might know more than me. I hope you find these words useful. Note that I strongly believe that for a short while, a stock and the company can have two completely different stories and understanding that difference is where an individual investor can find an advantage.

MVIS
Market Cap $0.16B
Years from now MVIS will be a fantastic story or completely forgotten. I though 2003 would be the year they transitioned from a speculative stock to an investment. With Nomad and Flic out there, and all of the proposed products someone should have started buying up this stock, and maybe the company. If not 2003, then will it finally happen in 2004? Their financials look good enough. Their potential for revenue is definitely strong enough. But I wonder if I have become too enamored of their potentials. Their actuals are that neither Nomad nor Flic wowed the people who sign the purchase orders. Where are the 100,000 unit Flic orders we heard about? I will be patient, watchful and HOLD. When the good news hits things will happen fast. If it never happens, then end might be long and drawn.

DISCLAIMER
My wife and I are LTBH (Long Term Buy and Hold) with a strong emphasis on the H. Our total churn for 2003 was to buy two or three stocks back in March and haven’t sold anything for over a year. I am NOT a professional investor or an expert in any of the topics I discussed, but that is the nature of most individual investors. I undoubtedly overlooked something great about each company and also missed some warning signal. I invest with the knowledge that no company is perfect and realize that risk and chance determine future performance as much as in-depth analysis. Of course, it has worked so far. I have been investing for over two decades and continue to learn how much I don’t know.

Good luck to all.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: tktrimbath who wrote (5844)1/1/2004 6:57:26 AM
From: JDN   of 7340
 
Your thoughts make sense to me. My thinking is that there are two types of managers. Those that love research and are enamored with Gee Whiz results and those that just take a product, learn how to manufacture and market it efficiently and are content to have Gee Whiz sales and earnings. After 5 years of ownership, I have come to the conclusion we have the former, seems to me everytime we get something that looks like it has good earning potential we start inventing something else. This company looks to me like a research Lab. I added a little in 2003 when it dropped so much but dont plan to add anymore until I see them starting to get involved more in Commercial Ventures. jdn

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: JDN who wrote (5845)1/1/2004 2:04:46 PM
From: dwight martin   of 7340
 
tkt and jnd, some partially connected thoughts:

I think you might have underweighted the fact the more "leading-edge" a technology is, the more it may be subject to the distractions of applications that were not even considered at an early stage. We do have a lot of this with MVIS-- I remember the retinal diagnostic tool, the Gemfire episode, and I feel strongly there are several others. And I have not seen anyone step up with potentially superseding technology.

Also, the starting point on the "path of maximum profit" for the potential users of MVIS technology has either not yet been made clear or, if clear, has not yet been reached.
The deployment of any particular one of the various applications will not occur until the market is ready for the product AND the product is ready for the market. For example, if Canon can squeeze another few million sales using their existing viewfinder at essentially zero incremental cost to Canon, why wouldn't they? The fat part of the bat is October-December anyway, and nobody was saying that the MVIS gadget could have been ready by then.
Similarly, the cellphone app awaits widespread deployment of 3G, esp. the picture and video phones.

I hope they are taking their opportunity to fine-tune their gadget and improve fabrication processes. I haven't heard a word about Walsin-Lihwa in ages. I wonder if they are still in the picture.

And there's Lumera, who should be making some noise this month or next.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: dwight martin who wrote (5846)1/1/2004 7:53:13 PM
From: JDN   of 7340
 
Well all of us OLD TIMERS here remember the exciting days of having a T/V set no larger then the head of a pin that displayed a 27" screen. You could PIN IT in a picture on the wall. I am still waiting. (gg) jdn

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: toby cyr who started this subject1/7/2004 2:43:39 PM
From: Rob   of 7340
 
this is a nice little support of research but does not account for a 5% increase in the stock today!
>
Microvision, Inc., Bothell
Researcher: Dr. Kannan M. Krishnan, UW Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering
Microvision, Inc. designs and markets information display and capture products and component technologies. The company develops and commercializes the scanned beam technology, using MEMS micro mirrors for information displays and image capture products, such as a camera or barcode readers.

Micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS)-based scanners are a natural choice for the scanning mirror requirements of scanned beam displays (SBDs). SBDs offer unique advantages for near-to-eye applications such as head-worn displays for DVD players, or image capture applications including bar code scanners and endoscopes.

Current MEMS technologies offer scanners that are small and relatively low cost to manufacture. However, many consumer market applications require lower cost, smaller packaging and lower battery drain. Achieving these goals will open up numerous high-volume consumer product opportunities, as no other display technology, such as LCDs, can compete in the area of performance. Improving the MEMS actuation means (controlling the motion of a MEMS scanner) is one way to achieve these goals.

This project teams Microvision with Professor Krishnan to investigate the development of materials and processes for fabrication of hard micromagnets for actuation of MEMS devices. These new materials can reduce size, power and costs, opening up the growing consumer market.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Rob who wrote (5848)1/8/2004 5:28:49 PM
From: Rob   of 7340
 
from yahoo via Motley Fool
>>

Author: TechnoWreck Number: of 818

Nice Yahoo post from Bizprof:

This latest patent application is another example of the powerful MVIS IP portfolio. Several years ago, IBM did a research study on near-eye display technology. They evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of each technology and concluded that there were many competitors in all of the approaches save one....SCANNING. The IBM researchers stated that although scanning was potentially the best (lowest cost), all companies except MVIS had abandoned the approach because of the technological difficulty. Well, MVIS beat the odds. They have the best approach (scanning), and since everyone else gave up, we have all the patents (which continue to grow). In fact, in a moment of extreme candor, Steve Wiley was quoted as saying something like, "at some point you have cornered the market.. and that point is fast approaching". Why do you think all of these big companies are working with MVIS? They know that MVIS has essentially cornered the market on the most effective display technology. The cost/performance potential is very disruptive. There was also an article written about the "problem" with our patent laws. In the article it stated that some of the most important new technologies were being completely dominated by a few "small" companies. MVIS was given as an example re scanning. The hedge funds know all of this but have bet that they could short and cover before MVIS could deploy their technology. The daytrading bashers who show up and type in all caps have no idea what they are messing with. MVIS turned the corner with one word in a recent PR. That word was DEPLOY. When the Army actually deployed MVIS scanning technology to Iraq, it validated our technology and signaled that MVIS is no longer an R&D company chasing after a dream that all of the big boys had abandoned years ago because it was "too dificult". So for those of you that like to jump all over the management and RR in particular, please realize that they have done, what IBM, (with all of their resources)considered too difficult to do. And RR and company have done it through the bubble burst, and 3 years of the crappiest economy in memory. For all the criticism, here we stand, at the other end of a dark tunnel, finally viewing the bright light, with NO DEBT, only about 21 million shares outstanding and with sole right to the technology that will (IMHO) be to this century what the CRT was to the last. So, die hard longs, keep heart. The risk of holding this stock long term has all but disappeared (IMHO). It took 10 years, a quarter of a billion dollars, brass balls the size of grapefruit, vision, and a lot of luck. We are the last man standing and the prize is ours. Rejoice. MVIS, congratulations, you have done what was thought by the experts to be impossible. You have perfected the technology and now it is on to "execution". Beginning in the second quarter you will be rightly judged on your deployment of this technology into the marketplace. I know you are ready. Good Luck.
messages.yahoo.com 
Smiles,
Bill(still nibbling 100 here, 100 there)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Rob who wrote (5849)1/9/2004 5:51:02 AM
From: JDN   of 7340
 
Nice to pick up another BELIEVER! (haha). After 5 years my reply is SHOW ME THE BEEF!! jdn

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: JDN who wrote (5850)1/10/2004 6:18:01 PM
From: n2growthe   of 7340
 
C.E.Unterberg Towbin Buy Rec. 12/30/2003 Target $9.50-$11.50

Microvision, Inc. (MVIS 1,2,3,5,6,7 $7 .4 9 )
SHORT-T E RM MARKET P E RF ORM
LONG-TERM BUY
MVIS: Lumera Contract-Greater Visibility for 2004

• Microvision’s majority-owned subsidiary, Lumera, announced a
$950,000 contract from the U.S. Government to continue
developing high performance electro-optic polymers that would
be used to create wideband optical modulators. This is the second
contract extension on this project and brings total funding to $3.5
million. The specific unit of the US Government is not named,
but both DARPA and the Missile Defense Agency have active
programs in this area.
• We have modeled $2MM in revenues in 2004 from Lumera, and
this goes a long way to that estimate. Lumera will require cash
by the end of Q104, and MVIS maintains that Lumera must raise
that cash on its own. There is always a chance MVIS would be
part of the funding, but we believe, based on Microvision's
history with Lumera, that this risk is low.
• We recently initiated coverage of Microvision, Inc. with a Market
Perform/Buy rating and $9.50 to $11.50 price target range. The
company has gained traction in recent months with the US military,
NCR, Canon and American Honda. We expect further
announcements of purchase orders for the Nomad™ and Flic™ laser
bar code scanner products over the next few months.
• Microvision's scanned beam technology platform eliminates the
visualization bottleneck. Microvision has a unique technology
platform that it should be able to leverage to a wide range of
applications. We believe visualization bottlenecks exist in many
different areas, implying the company’s addressable market is
potentially very large. The technology uses a scanning mirror and a
beam of light to paint images on the retina of the viewer's eye, with
no screen to block the viewer's field of vision. This technique
provides a unique, true "see-through" capability. The scanner
developed for a scanned beam display can be used in reverse to
create image capture devices such as a bar code reader or a laser
camera.
Key Data
52-Week Range $3.43 - $9.38
Shares Outstanding (MM) 21.4
Float (MM) 19.6
% Held Institutionally 12.2%
Market Capitalization (MM) $160.3
Average Daily Volume (000) 168.4
Revenues – LTM (MM) $13.8
Total Debt (MM) $0.3
Cash Per Share $1.55
3-Yr. EPS Growth Rate NM
12-Month Price Target Range $9.50-$11.50
Fiscal Year Ends: Dec 2002A 2003E 2004E
Revenue (MM) $15.9 $15.2 $25.7
Earnings per Share
Q1 $(0.63) $(0.46)A $(0.30)
Q2 $(0.49) $(0.38)A $(0.23)
Q3 $(0.37) $(0.39)A $(0.21)
Q4 $(0.46) $(0.28)E $(0.16)
Year $(1.93) $(1.48)E $(0.91)
P/E NM NM
Diluted Shares (MM) 14.1 21.4 21.4
Company Overview: Microvision develops high-resolution
displays and imaging systems based on the
company's proprietary silicon micro-mirror technology.
The company's technology has applications in a broad
range of military, medical, industrial, professional and
consumer products.
December 30, 2003
C OMPA NY R E P OR T

C.E. UNTERBERG, TOWBIN
2
• Its launch product is a head-mounted display system, known as the Nomad™ Augmented
Vision System, a see-through, head worn display. The company's first commercial target
market for the Nomad™ is the automotive repair industry. We believe the addressable market
exceeds $1 billion. We expect the company to start production of the Nomad™ in early 2004
and for it to generate $10.2 million in revenue next year.
• The company's next product, the Flic™ Laser Bar Code Scanner is a low cost, highly
advanced laser bar code scanner. The entire market for handheld scanners is an estimated $1
billion. In November, Microvision received two purchase orders for over 5,000 Flic™ bar
code scanners from NCR. We expect customer traction for Flic™ to continue and for it to
generate approximately $2 million in revenue in 2004.
• The opportunity is large; so too, we believe, are the risks. Microvision has been a
developmental stage company and is in the early stages of marketing and producing
commercial quantities of Nomad™ and Flic™. Risk of execution and financing could delay
and endanger the company’s development.
• Our $9.50 to $11.50 price target range is based on an enterprise value to sales multiple
of 3.6x to 4.4x our Q4 05 run rate sales estimate of $56 million.
Investment Risks
Execution Risk
To date, Microvision has produced limited quantities of Nomad and Flic™ products. As a
result, the company could be subject to product development risk either through their own
or their overseas OEM partners' delays, which could affect its revenues. Microvision also
has various development contracts with the U.S. government, BMW, Canon and others
that are exploratory in nature and are intended to develop new types of technology or
applications. These efforts may prove unsuccessful and these relationships may not prove
to be profitable.
Financing Risk
The company recently raised $21 million bringing its cash balance to $27 million, but will
probably need to tap the capital markets again in 2004. The recent cash burn rate of $6
million per quarter could diminish as product revenues increase, but a rapid growth could
place strains on the company’s working capital. There is no assurance the capital markets
will be favorable to continued investments in Microvision.
Competition
The information display industry is highly competitive, and Microvision's Nomad products
compete with miniaturized cathode ray tube and flat panel display devices from
manufacturers such as Kopin, Sony and Texas Instruments. The bar code scanning
industry is also highly competitive and dominated by Symbol Technologies. Microvision's
Flic™ products will compete with existing laser and wand type scanners produced by
established bar code companies.

C.E. UNTERBERG, TOWBIN
3
Technology Risk
Although the company has experienced recent customer traction, the scanned beam
technology may not be widely accepted by manufacturers who use display technologies in
their products or by customers of these products in the defense, industrial, medical and
consumer markets. Additionally, customers, such as the Medical Special Forces division
of the U.S. Army, would be more inclined to use a product that features a full color,
wireless display as opposed to the current wired, monochrome display.
Potential Patent Litigation
Even though the company has an extensive patent portfolio, there are several patents held
by third parties that relate to certain aspects of scanned beam displays and image-capture
products. These patents could be used as a basis to challenge the validity, limit the scope
or limit Microvision's ability to obtain additional or broader patent rights of the company's
patents or patents that it has licensed.
Lumera
In 2000, Microvision formed a subsidiary called Lumera, which develops electro-optic
materials based on its proprietary polymer compounds and processing technologies. These
materials can be used to improve the performance of electronic components found in
optical and wireless communications systems, semiconductor markets and biotechnology
applications. Lumera’s primary source of revenue to date has been from the U.S.
government contracts for materials development.
The consolidated financial statements include both Microvision and Lumera. As of
September 30, 2003, Microvision owned 76% of the common stock, 11% of the Series A
and 46% of the Series B convertible preferred stock. In August 2003, Microvision
invested $868,000 in a financing for Lumera, of Series B convertible preferred stock, in
order to maintain its ownership level.
Microvision is not contractually obligated to provide funding for Lumera, and its exit
strategy is to spin it off to shareholders. With its majority interest, Microvision maintains
its tax-free status in the event of a spin-off. Lumera raised additional funds on October 30,
2003. At the time of the last financing, the valuation for Lumera was $20 million.
Lumera is burning approximately $1 million per quarter, and will need to raise cash in the
new year. Microvision’s original $6 million investment was reduced in March of 2001 by
$3.5 million with a raise from outside investors. Since then, Microvision has made one
additional capital contribution ($868,000 in August 2003) and it has committed to
shareholders that Lumera’s cash needs will constitute a call on Microvision. Certainly, at
the right valuation, MVIS would raise cash in order to help keep Lumera alive, so there is,
in our opinion, some risk of Microvision raising additional cash to fund Lumera and/or
depleting its cash to fund Lumera.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: n2growthe who wrote (5851)1/23/2004 7:24:59 AM
From: n2growthe   of 7340
 
MVIS Featured in Business Week

Cut and past link:

businessweek.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.