SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Technology Stocks | CAWS - Wireless Cable (New and Improved)


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Ken Turetzky who wrote (261)11/13/1996 3:47:00 PM
From: Joseph Moran   of 5812
 
From the New York Times
Material Shortage Affects Prices Of Optical Cables

By SETH SCHIESEL

The information highway is being paved with glass, but now the road crews are running low.
A worldwide shortage of optical fiber is slowing the construction of new telecommunications networks and forcing even big buyers to renegotiate supply agreements. Meanwhile, the shortfall is proving a bonanza for the small fraternity of fiber manufacturers as prices that fell for years have stabilized and in some cases even increased.
Behind it all has been an explosive growth in demand for fiber-optic cable - bundled strands of optical fiber that can each carry thousands of telephone conversations in a glass thread as thin as an eyelash.
Driven by an expanding market for Internet access and other high-speed communications links, annual installation of optical fiber around the world has doubled since 1993 to an estimated 16.25 million miles this year. That is a global fiber market of about $6 billion, with about one-third of the sales in North America, according to KMI Corp., a Newport, R.I., market research firm. And analysts and telecommunications executives agree that new forms of competition unleashed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 insure that the appetite for fiber will not be sated soon.
``The rate at which the growth occurred has surprised just about everybody,'' said Clifford L. Hund, telecommunications marketing director for Corning, the world's largest optical fiber manufacturer. ``No one is getting all the fiber they want.''
Demand for optical fiber has run about 10 percent higher than production over the last year, leaving the supply about 1.25 million miles short of what buyers are seeking, said Robert P. Mohalley, a vice president at Lucent Technologies, the recently spun-off AT&T equipment unit that is the second-largest optical fiber maker.
Customers ``have to wait a little longer to get some projects done,'' Mohalley said. ``We've tried to share the pain.''
But as in most tight markets, the pain is not always shared equally. Helping propel the tremendous growth in U.S. demand for optical fiber is the construction of two new national telecommunications networks - a $2 billion venture by Qwest Communications, a subsidiary of Anschutz Corp., and a $600 million joint project by IXC Communications and Worldcom Inc. Both networks, set for completion by the end of 1998, are meant to compete with the national webs of the big three long-distance carriers - AT&T, MCI Communications and Sprint.
Also placing big new fiber orders are cable television companies seeking to upgrade their networks to carry more channels, advanced video and data services, and even telephone calls. Various other players, large and small, are also building metropolitan fiber networks to compete with the Baby Bells for local phone and data services. And as in most tight markets, the customers with the most to spend usually go to the front of the line.
``Earlier this year it was very tight; we were having problems getting enough fiber committed to do this build,'' said Tony Brodman, vice president for planning at Qwest Communications, which is using fiber-optic cable made by Lucent in its network.
Qwest's ambitious venture recently received new credibility when Frontier Corp., the nation's fifth-largest long-distance carrier, invested $500 million in the project and agreed to lease one-fourth of its capacity when completed. ``When the manufacturers realized we were serious,'' Brodman said of his fiber suppliers, ``clearly that helped.''
Time Warner, the No.2 cable television company and one of the world's leading buyers of optical fiber, will spend more than $30 million on fiber cable this year, said the company's chief technical officer, James A. Chiddix.
Under pressure from direct broadcast satellite networks like Hughes Electronics' 150-channel-plus DirecTV system, Time Warner and other cable operators are rushing to expand their network capacity.
``We're big enough that we can get supplied,'' Chiddix said. ``For a small customer, it's been rough.''
Just ask David D. Kinley, chairman of the Small Cable Business Association, which represents nearly 300 of the nation's smaller cable operators.
``You have very little leverage to get better prices or quantity discounts or quick delivery,'' Kinley said. As president of Sun Country Cable in Pleasanton, Calif. - which has about 10,000 subscribers, all in rural areas, and will soon buy about 30 miles of fiber-optic cable - Kinley is ``nervous - nervous about what price we're going to get and how soon.''
The average price of optical fiber fell from about 33 cents a meter in 1983 to 6 cents or 7 cents in 1994, according to Thomas A. Soja, a KMI analyst. But prices stabilized in 1994, and since last year Corning and Lucent have announced price increases for some optical fibers of up to 15 percent - their first price hikes ever, Soja said.
And when some smaller buyers do come to terms, deliveries might not arrive as soon as they would like. At Falcon Cable, which is based in Westwood, Calif., and serves 1.2 million subscribers in 27 states, ``deliveries are running anywhere from 16 weeks on out,'' said Raymond J. Tyndall, vice-president of engineering. ``In the past they've been as close as 4 to 6 weeks.''
Even some high-volume buyers are enduring delays. Late last year Pacific Bell, the local telephone arm of Pacific Telesis Group, renegotiated its pact with Pirelli Cable Corp., a unit of Pirelli of Italy, which in the United States assembles cable from other companies' glass fiber. Under the new terms Pirelli won more time to make its deliveries.
Between this year and next, Pacific Bell intends to spend $378 million installing fiber-optic cable and associated electronics. And though Pacific Bell executives deny any connection with the optical fiber shortage, the company announced last week that it would lease data capacity from a wireless company, in part to help meet heavy demand for new high-capacity Internet circuits in the Bay Area and Silicon Valley.
This means boom times for companies that make optical fiber. ``It's the Midas Touch,'' said C. David Chaffee, senior editor at Fiber Optics News, an industry newsletter. ``You build this stuff and people want to buy it,'' Chaffee said.
Among the smaller fiber suppliers, no company has made out better than Spectran Corp., based in Sturbridge, Mass., which had been struggling to post a profit in recent years.
But this year, Spectran has benefited greatly from the inability of the large manufacturers to meet demand. Corning agreed in February to subcontract $17 million worth of optical fiber business to Spectran over three years. Lucent followed in October with a $35 million deal.
On the strength of such contracts, Spectran announced a more than fivefold increase in third-quarter profits last week, reporting earnings of 17 cents a share on revenues of $16.2 million - which were up 62 percent from the comparable quarter last year. The company's stock has almost tripled in value since January, closing Friday at $17.125, up 25 cents, in Nasdaq trading.
Customers and manufacturers are counting on expansions at the major manufacturers to eventually relieve the shortage. By January, Lucent expects to complete a $300 million upgrade of its primary optical fiber factory in Atlanta, which will double the company's fiber-making capacity. Corning, meanwhile, plans by 2000 to double its production capacity by spending some $500 million to expand its main fiber plant in Wilmington, N.C., and build a new factory near Midland, N.C.
With most analysts expecting demand for optical fiber to grow by at least 20 percent annually for the next few years, the builders of the information highway may be scrounging for pavement for some time yet.
The entire 1997 cable production of Siecor Corp. - jointly owned by Corning and Siemens AG and the largest assembler of fiber-optic cable - is already contracted for, according to Joseph D. Hicks, Siecor's chief executive.
John N. Kessler, another KMI analyst, said, ``If production is increased at present rates, demand will be met sometime around the turn of the century.''
That could mean continued stress for buyers. But suppliers like Hund of Corning don't mind having customers clamor at the doors. ``As long as competition goes on and people feel the need to build networks,'' Hund said, ``that's great.''
00:04 EST NOVEMBER 4, 1996

The New York Times News Service via DowVision c 1996 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Ken Turetzky who wrote (261)11/13/1996 4:40:00 PM
From: Zorro   of 5812
 
For all you CAWS analysts,

Here is a new twist to the CAWS melodrama:

phillips.com:8131 

Good luck to all...

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Zorro who wrote (263)11/13/1996 4:53:00 PM
From: counsel777   of 5812
 
Hey Zorro -- what's the password?!

AK

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: counsel777 who wrote (264)11/13/1996 5:05:00 PM
From: Zorro   of 5812
 
Try username: ijumpstart password: search

If that doesn't work,

go to ijumpstart.com 

and do a Search for keyword: MMDS.

Zorro

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Zorro who wrote (263)11/13/1996 5:55:00 PM
From: John A. Young   of 5812
 
19961028

ECHOSTAR SAYS IT PLANS TO SELL DIGITAL
FARE TO MMDS OPERATORS


October 28, 1996

Echostar Communications Corp. [DISH] last week announced that it plans to sell digitally compressed programming to
multichannel multipoint distribution service (MMDS) operators for redistribution to wireless cable subscribers.

The move is a blow to direct broadcast satellite (DBS) hopeful TelQuest Ventures LLC, which is awaiting FCC approval
of a controversial plan to provide U.S. DBS service from a Canadian orbital slot. Echostar is among a host of companies
which have lined up to oppose TelQuest's plan to share a Canadian DBS slot at 91 degrees W with Telesat Canada, citing
Canadian content laws which effectively keep U.S. DBS programmers out of the Canadian market. (Tele-Communications
Inc. [TCOMA] also hopes to work with Canada to migrate its Primestar service to high power.) The FCC turned down
TelQuest's application in mid-July (CT, 7/15).

TelQuest's business plan centers around feeding MMDS concerns DBS programming. Like Echostar, TelQuest says its
customers would be able to combine satellite-delivered digital programming with local channels and offer subscribers a
complete package comparable to traditional cable television.

Barbara Sparks, executive vice president of TelQuest, downplayed the impact Echostar's announcement will have on her
company's business.

"We welcome the competition. We've always been for competition," said Sparks. "[But] I guess their announcement raises
more questions than answers. Why are they announcing it now?"

While Sparks said TelQuest will be able to operate in a competitive environment, she said the process of awaiting FCC
permission for her company's plan to work with Telesat is frustrating. "You just try to keep all the pieces together while
you're waiting. We have recent indications that things are moving more positively."

Echostar Saw an Opportunity and Decided to Move

David Moskowitz, Echostar senior vice president and general counsel, acknowledged that the company took TelQuest's
plans into account when evaluating the viability of launching an MMDS business.

"We view this as an exciting business opportunity. We looked at what TelQuest was saying and decided it made good
business sense to do this more quickly," said Moskowitz.

He declined to reveal which wireless cable concerns Echostar is courting, but did say there is interest among MMDS
companies in working with Echostar.

"We expect [announcements of deals] in the near future," said Moskowitz.

He added that Echostar will act only as a conduit to bring digitally compressed channels to the MMDS distributors, who
stand to save considerably since they otherwise would have to purchase their own compression equipment and multiple
satellite dishes.

If they use DBS-delivered material, wireless cable concerns can use the same 18-inch satellite dish used by consumers who
directly receive DBS packages at home. However, Moskowitz said operators may choose to use a larger dish to minimize
the potential signal loss that can result from heavy rain if an 18-inch antenna is used.

Individual operators will need permission from each programmer they plan to offer in their channel packages, said
Moskowitz. Echostar's arrangements with the channels included in its DISH Network DBS service cover only the actual
DBS service, he said.

Because MMDS systems have limited channel capacity, they are unable to carry the 100-plus channels available to DISH
Network subscribers. In addition, wireless cable users will not be able to offer Echostar's pay-per-view options.

CORRECTION:

The name of the MCI Communications Corp. [MCIC]-National Bank of Mexico joint-venture participating in the
Mexican paging auction is Avantel, not Banamex, as reported last week (CT, 10/24). Grupo Financiero
Banamex-Accival is the Mexican name of Mexico City-based National Bank of Mexico. An MCI spokesman confirmed
that Avantel is participating in the auction. The company may use the frequencies it wins to build a paging system; however, it
also is considering purchasing an existing carrier or reselling services from another carrier, the spokesman said.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: BILL JAMES who wrote (256)11/13/1996 6:28:00 PM
From: Larry Williams   of 5812
 
"If we have 14,000,000 potential customers @$40 per line of sight customer, then we have a company with a market value of $560,000,000 based on the MMDS rights alone"

So, let me see, if everyone became an internet customer at $20 per month and a t.v. customer at $20 per month, that would be a little shy of $7 billion in annual revenues, right? Is that possible?

Larry

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Larry Williams who wrote (267)11/13/1996 7:43:00 PM
From: BILL JAMES   of 5812
 
Not probable by any stretch of the imagination, but the systemin Atlanta that is analog was based on $40 per passed house the figure for real customers is much higher, if you bo back through the thread the story and exact numbers are posted.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: .com who wrote (247)11/13/1996 8:08:00 PM
From: BILL JAMES   of 5812
 
11/13/96 - 8:05 p.m. Eastern Time

11/13/96 - C A I WIRELESS SYS INC COM- CAWS - $3.875

Symbol Issue Bid Asked Ref#*
--------------------------------------------------------------------
QCW CA CAWS MAR 22, 1997 $ 5.000 CALL 0.625 0.875 2248
QCW CB CAWS MAR 22, 1997 $ 10.000 CALL 0.125 0.375 2248
QCW CU CAWS MAR 22, 1997 $ 7.500 CALL 0.312 0.562 2248
QCW FA CAWS JUN 21, 1997 $ 5.000 CALL 0.750 1.000 2248
QCW FB CAWS JUN 21, 1997 $ 10.000 CALL 0.000 0.000 2248
QCW FU CAWS JUN 21, 1997 $ 7.500 CALL 0.500 0.750 2248
QCW KA CAWS NOV 16, 1996 $ 5.000 CALL 0.000 0.062 2248
QCW KB CAWS NOV 16, 1996 $ 10.000 CALL 0.000 0.125 2248
QCW KU CAWS NOV 16, 1996 $ 7.500 CALL 0.000 0.062 2248
QCW LA CAWS DEC 21, 1996 $ 5.000 CALL 0.125 0.312 2248
QCW LB CAWS DEC 21, 1996 $ 10.000 CALL 0.000 0.250 2248
QCW LC CAWS DEC 21, 1996 $ 15.000 CALL 0.000 0.000 2248
QCW LU CAWS DEC 21, 1996 $ 7.500 CALL 0.000 0.125 2248
QCW LV CAWS DEC 21, 1996 $ 12.500 CALL 0.000 0.000 2248
QCW LW CAWS DEC 21, 1996 $ 17.500 CALL 0.000 0.000 2248
QCW OA CAWS MAR 22, 1997 $ 5.000 PUT 1.312 1.562 2248
QCW OB CAWS MAR 22, 1997 $ 10.000 PUT 5.750 6.250 2248
QCW OU CAWS MAR 22, 1997 $ 7.500 PUT 3.375 3.750 2248
QCW RA CAWS JUN 21, 1997 $ 5.000 PUT 0.000 0.000 2248
QCW RB CAWS JUN 21, 1997 $ 10.000 PUT 0.000 0.000 2248
QCW RU CAWS JUN 21, 1997 $ 7.500 PUT 3.500 3.875 2248
QCW WA CAWS NOV 16, 1996 $ 5.000 PUT 0.812 1.062 2248
QCW WB CAWS NOV 16, 1996 $ 10.000 PUT 5.750 6.250 2248
QCW WU CAWS NOV 16, 1996 $ 7.500 PUT 3.250 3.625 2248
QCW XA CAWS DEC 21, 1996 $ 5.000 PUT 1.000 1.250 2248
QCW XB CAWS DEC 21, 1996 $ 10.000 PUT 5.750 6.250 2248
QCW XC CAWS DEC 21, 1996 $ 15.000 PUT 10.875 11.625 2248
QCW XU CAWS DEC 21, 1996 $ 7.500 PUT 3.375 3.750 2248
QCW XV CAWS DEC 21, 1996 $ 12.500 PUT 8.375 8.875 2248
QCW XW CAWS DEC 21, 1996 $ 17.500 PUT 13.375 14.125 2248
--------------------------------------------------------------------
* Reference numbers are used for searching option classes in option edge.




Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: BILL JAMES who wrote (268)11/13/1996 10:15:00 PM
From: Larry Williams   of 5812
 
Yeah, I'm just toying with wishful thinking....

I'm not suggesting that such revenue is acheivable. But like any new technology, the ability to get to market is probably overestimated and the long term benefits are probably underestimated.

Ray Smith of BA said the following at the Bear Stearns Media & Communications Conference on 10/23/96 (apologies if it is a repost):

"The other content-related market opportunity is, of course, video services. The recent success of direct-broadcast satellite (DBS) services has shown us what can happen when customers are offered greater choice in the marketplace. Our own interactive video market trial in northern Virginia, which just concluded, showed us we can take customer choice a big step further.

The trial demonstrated that customers want interactive video and are willing to pay for it. Video-on-demand buy rates exceeded standard pay-per-view almost 12 to one. Why? Because interactivity gives customers much more choice, convenience and control.

That's why in the mid-Atlantic region -- where video is a $4 billion-plus business -- we think we can capture 30-35 percent of homes passed in every market we enter."

Sounds like BA has about $1 billion annually baked into their 3 to 5 year outlooks for video based on these comments. I assume CAWS is a big part of that number.

Personally, I still don't accept that more revenue could not be achieved.

Larry

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Bexar who wrote (252)11/13/1996 10:57:00 PM
From: .com   of 5812
 
Mark: I tried to E-Mail you some info on options but it kept getting sent back. Is the address in your profile right? If you send me the right address I'll try again.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.