SI
SI

 Biotech / Medical | Elan Corporation, plc (ELN)


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Harold Engstrom who wrote (9379)5/22/2007 12:29:36 PM
From: SI Bob   of 10345
 
Well, I was worried I'd end up on the outside looking in when this happened, but when it started upwards, I got back to about a 3/4 full position at prices up to $16.40. Substantially more than what I'd sold for, but glad I'm not all the way outside.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

From: tom pope5/22/2007 1:11:12 PM
   of 10345
 
C has upgraded ELN from sell to hold.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: mikehunt2 who wrote (9378)5/22/2007 1:32:39 PM
From: fred hayes   of 10345
 
Mike, I think your numbers are too soft to argue with, altho the number of shares seems low. I think there will be substantially more shares outstanding if and when your other numbers materialize. Maybe someone already has figured out how many potential shares might be issued at substantially higher stock prices (post it if you've got it, anyone -- I'm talking options and convertibles). I'll dig it out later if no one has it. Your frame of reference looks valid to me, except for taxes. The numbers of patients, penetration rate, and drug price seem optimistic, but who knows at this point. The message to me is that there is potential, with a little good luck, for a multi-multi bagger with reasonable risk. I don't know if it's worth trying to be too exact beyond that. It would be nice if your numbers turn out to be in the ballpark.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: Doc Bones5/25/2007 3:21:12 AM
3 Recommendations   of 10345
 
May 24, 2007, 1:00 pm

Elan CEO: Collaboration Prevents Predation
Posted by Jacob Goldstein

With a market cap of about $9 billion and a few products already on the market, Irish biotech shop Elan could be a ripe target for a takeover by any of several Big Pharma players eager to expand their biotech footprint. (For evidence of that eagerness, see AstraZeneca’s recent $15 billion buyout of MedImmune.)

But no one has bid on Elan, CEO Kelly Martin said today. Part of the reason: The company’s sprawling array of complicated joint ventures with other pharmaceutical and biotech companies would make it hard for a potential acquirer to get its money’s worth. “These assets are partnered and have various chains of control triggers, so it’s not terribly straightforward,” Martin told Dow Jones in an interview after the company’s annual meeting.

The company has a 50-50 partnership with Biogen Idec on its multiple sclerosis drug Tysabri. And it’s partnered with Wyeth on an experimental Alzheimer’s drug that the companies said this week is going into late-stage trials.

“Elan is not a corporate asset that can be freely traded around,” Martin said. “Elan shareholders would need to get full value for all assets. The best defense is a good offense and that is to grow the company.”

Permalink | Trackback URL: blogs.wsj.com 



Comments
Report offensive comments to healthblog@wsj.com

I expect Kelly said “change of control,” not “chains of control.”

I posted the following yesterday under an older Health Blog entry about Elan that may be missed by many readers who don’t go back after a couple of days, so here it is again:

Over the past few quarters, institutional holders have significantly increased their holdings of Elan. The top ten institutional holders now own nearly half the shares:

FMR (Fidelity) 70.8 million shares

Wellington 45.4

Westfield 21.3

T Rowe Price 13.4

Tudor 11.7

Oracle 11.1

Invus 9.1

Suttonbrook 7.5

CR Intrinsic 5.5

BB Biotech 3.9

Total 190.6 million shares of 467 million shares outstanding.

Some of these institutional holders have Elan as their top holding, or among their top few holdings. Fidelity owns over 15% of the company, its largest percentage position in any pharma or biotech company. You can be certain that they have done their due diligence, particularly after most of these investors were hurt badly in 2002 and 2005 when the share price plummeted as low as $1.03. The tide has changed with Tysabri and the very broad and deep Alzheimer’s program (indeed, Tysabri was a “failed” product of the Alzheimer’s program). Expect Tysabri to be approved for Crohn’s disease in the EU in the next couple of months, and in the US in October. Look for Tysabri uptake to be at a run rate of about 25,000 to 30,000 patients by the end of this year, and 50,000 to 80,000 by the end of 2008. Look for the possibility of a BLA filing within the next year for AAB-001 for an initial short term indication, based on the Phase II data, with an sBLA for disease modification following completion of the Phase III trials. Drug deliver is quietly bringing in 250 million or so annually, at a good growth rate, which will replace the two hospital drugs as they get generic competition.

Comment by Elan watcher - May 24, 2007 at 4:33 pm
One more point — The US analysts have almost without exception had Elan at a “sell” or “hold” since 2005, and only the Irish analysts have really taken the time to understand the company. Although few investors follow the analysts anymore, the tide is starting to turn.

Merrill Lynch suspended coverage several weeks ago (due to “reallocation of resources”), having had a “sell” and a $5.50 “fair value” for a long time while the shares were generally trading at three times that much. In fact, Merrill Listed Elan as its “Top SELL idea for 2007? in a January 4, 2007 report. In its April 18th note announcing the suspension of coverage, Merrill said that “investors should not rely on our previous opinion or estimates,” but curiously then went on for 13 pages reiterating its reasons for its previous “sell” rating.

The Piper Jaffray analyst who had an “underperform” and a $10 price target was reassigned recently.

Lehman Brothers almost never misses an opportunity to pan the company and has had a $10 target price for quite some time.

Citigroup had a “sell” and a $12 target price since November 2005, when it was raised to $10 from the $2.50 target in place since March 2005. Similar views were held by many others. In the past few days, Citigroup “upgraded” from “sell” to “hold” (if you sold when they told you to, don’t you have to buy it before you can hold it?) and raised the target from $12 to $21 (just transpose the digits).

Goldman Sachs Credit Research initiated coverage on March 7th with an “outperform” (I have often found credit analysts to be more objective than the equity side), and the equity side at Goldman initiated coverage today with a “buy” and a $25 price target.

Many of us suspect that these ratings have been kept low to permit certain investors to build positions in the mid-teens, and then upgrade over the next year or so as newer investors chase the share price. Those of us who have held the shares for years and added in quantity at times of extreme weakness have admitted to being ahead of the curve, but the curve is starting to catch up with us. We will enjoy watching others “discover” Elan over the next several quarters as the share price appreciates.

Comment by Elan watcher - May 24, 2007 at 5:07 pm

blogs.wsj.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Doc Bones who wrote (9383)5/25/2007 7:39:20 AM
From: Harold Engstrom   of 10345
 
Was a nice positive piece of research put out by GS too, with a buy recommendation for Elan and target of $25 ($29 if CD indication for T approved.) A quick scan seems to show that they have not built in value for the Lilly gamma secretase inhibitor.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Harold Engstrom who wrote (9384)5/25/2007 8:13:59 AM
From: kenhott   of 10345
 
I personally would place the gamma secretase inhibitor in a higher risk category. So maybe that's the reason why GS didn't give it any value if indeed it is missing from their valuation. Just guessing.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Harold Engstrom who wrote (9384)5/25/2007 10:02:07 AM
From: quidditch   of 10345
 
Here is the summary, Harold, initiating coverage--along with a note that ELN will present at a GS conference (as always, the format is bad):

Source of opportunity
We initiate coverage of Elan as Buy with a 12-month price target of
US$25/ADR. In our view, the value of Tysabri, the leveraging potential of
the Alzheimer’s Disease franchise and the value of the group’s c.US$3 bn
of utilizable tax losses are inadequately reflected in the shares. Despite
near-term risks for Tysabri (new PML cases), in our view, the group’s
improved risk profile is under-appreciated by investors. As an alternative
to buying the stock, our Credit Research team recommends buying longdated
(2013) bonds which are more sensitive to Tysabri than the R&D
pipeline, for yield. Our Options team also discusses derivatives strategies.
Growth
Returns *
Multiple
Volatility Volatility
Multiple
Returns *
Growth
Investment Profile: Elan Corporation (ADR)
Low High
Percentile 20th 40th 60th 80th 100th
* Returns = Return on Capital For a complete description of the
investment profile measures please refer to
the disclosure section of this document.
ELN
Europe Biotechnology Peer Group Average
Catalyst
Continuing growth of Tysabri sales (in MS) should provide solid support
for the shares, and if growth stays at current levels, could push the stock
higher. US and/or EU approvals for Tysabri in Crohn’s Disease are
potential catalysts before year-end. Phase II Bapineuzumab data (30-
patient PET scan study) could be a significant catalyst if positive, as could
a sub part E filing for Bapineuzumab in the US.
Valuation
Using our risk-adjusted DCF valuation methodology, we calculate a 12-
month price target of US$25/ADR; this implies a technology value of
US$27.40/ADR. Should Tysabri be approved in Crohn’s Disease, it could
add up to US$4/ADR to our price target.
Key risks
The main near-term risk to our price target and view is an increase in cases
of PML reported with Tysabri. In this scenario, we would view the risk of
another product withdrawal as low, unless there were a significant number
of new cases. However, we would expect acute share price weakness if
any cases are reported. Elan also has product development risks, in
common with other biotech companies.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: quidditch who wrote (9386)5/25/2007 10:09:32 AM
From: quidditch   of 10345
 
Here is more text from GS report--tables deleted:

Investment view: Tysabri, tax losses and Bapineuzumab
We are initiating coverage of Elan with a Buy rating and 12-month price target of
US$25/ADR. There are three key reasons for our optimism over Elan’s outlook:
• First, in our view, investors are underestimating the trajectory of Tysabri sales and the
profit leverage to this for Elan. Although the appearance of new cases of progressive
multi-focal leukoencephalopathy (PML) would be a negative for the stock, we view the
likelihood of the withdrawal of the drug for a second time as highly unlikely. An
approval in Crohn’s Disease represents upside to our valuation.
• Secondly, in our view, Bapineuzumab could potentially create a new paradigm for the
treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease; we view the supporting evidence for this approach
as compelling. If successful, this could change the intrinsic and strategic outlook for
Elan.
• Lastly, we believe that investors are largely ignoring the group’s US$2.8 bn of
utilizable tax losses; should Elan embark on any strategic transaction in the future
(either as an acquirer or as an acquisition target), the value of these tax losses would
need to be taken into account when valuing the group
Profitability from 2008
Using our proprietary risk-adjusted DCF valuation methodology, we calculate a 12-month
price target of US$25/ADR. Should Tysabri gain an approval in Crohn’s Disease, this could
potentially add up to US$4/ADR to our valuation. On our estimates, the group will reach
breakeven at the operating level in 2008 and profitability at the net income level in 2009.
Once the group reaches profitability, tax-loss carry forwards of US$2.8 bn can be used to
reduce any income tax burden. In our view, investors are overlooking the intrinsic and
strategic value of these tax losses. Post the full utilization of these tax losses, the group’s
tax rate will be the Irish standard corporate tax rate of 12.5%; we view that as a competitive
advantage relative to many other pharma and biotech companies.
Risk of new PML cases with Tysabri are the greatest risk
In our view, the largest near-term earnings and share price driver is the trajectory of
Tysabri sales. Should this fall short of market expectations or slow significantly, it would
be viewed negatively by investors and could impact our price target. Should any further
cases of PML be reported, we would expect share price weakness. We view the risk that
Tysabri could be withdrawn from the market as low, unless there were a significant
number of PML cases over a short period of time, indicating that the rate of PML is
significantly higher than currently anticipated. As with all development stage companies,
R&D product delays or failures are a risk.
Tysabri is the major near-term earnings driver
We expect sales of Maxipime and Azactam to decline, due to expected generic competition,
and believe that Prialt will remain a niche product. As such, revenues from Tysabri and
Elan Drug Technologies are the main drivers of earnings, with Tysabri being the more
significant contributor. We estimate that the breakeven point for Tysabri will be achieved
May 24, 2007 Elan Corporation (ADR) (ELN)
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 5
when 15,000 patients are on therapy (on an annualised basis). As there are now over
10,000 patients being treated, with another 2,500 enrolled in the TOUCH programme (a
mandatory risk management programme for patients who are prescribed Tysabri) we are
confident that Elan will reach the breakeven run rate before end-2007.
Financial strengths and weaknesses
The group is currently loss making. However, we forecast that it will reach breakeven at
the operating level in 2008 and profitability at the net income level in 2009. The trajectory
of the recovery in profitability is highly dependent on sales of Tysabri. We forecast that by
2010/2011, the launch of Bapineuzumab for Alzheimer’s Disease will significantly lower the
group’s dependence on Tysabri. At the same time, on our estimates, Bapineuzumab will
provide significant sale and earnings leverage.
Company profile: A very focused approach to R&D
Elan is a US$8.5 bn market value biopharmaceutical company based in Dublin, Ireland. It
has been restructured and re-focused by a new management team following the end of
off-balance sheet financing that led to significant divestments and restructuring from 2000.
As the group restructured and re-focused after 2000, it was predominantly debt-funded.
The group now has around US$700 mn in cash and US$1.7 bn in debt, though this does
not mature until 2011-2013. The group now generates revenues from its Hospital
Product/Specialty Product franchise, from Elan Drug Technologies and from sales of MS
drug Tysabri. The group has also built a credible R&D pipeline presence, focusing on
Autoimmune Diseases and Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases.
May 24, 2007 Elan Corporation (ADR) (ELN)
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 6
Valuation and financial outlook
Risk-adjusted DCF valuation: 12-month price target US$25/ADR
Using our proprietary risk-adjusted DCF valuation methodology, we calculate a 12-month
price target of US$25/ADR. This is around 33% above the current share price. Our key
valuation assumptions include:
• Maxipime suffers generic competition in 2007, with a significant negative impact from
2008
• Azactam revenues continue to benefit from zero generic competition in 2007, but we
assume generics enter the market during 2008
• We forecast peak sales for Prialt of US$32 mn
• Revenues from Elan Drug Technologies (contract manufacturing and royalty income)
continue to grow at double-digit rates, due to the launch of several new drugs that
utilize Elan’s drug delivery technologies. However, we assume lower profitability than
in 2006 going forward
• Tysabri revenues reach US$1.4 bn by 2011; we have not included sales in Crohn’s
Disease, however, if Tysabri is approved in this indication and reached peak sales of
US$500 mn, it could add up to US$4/ADR to our valuation
• SG&A cost increases remain relatively low in 2007-2010, providing significant profit
leverage
• The group reaches operating profit breakeven in 2008 and is profitable from 2009,
although the trajectory of profit growth will depend in the near term on Tysabri
revenues
• Bapineuzumab is in phase III within the next 12 months, but could be submitted for
approval under a sub part E filing in the US. We forecast a market launch in 2010 on
the assumption that Elan and partner Wyeth will conduct a phase III safety (and
efficacy) study regardless of whether it undertakes a sub part E filing for
Bapineuzumab
• We have assumed that there is no further debt re-scheduling (debt matures in 2011-
2013), although this is an option for the group
• In line with our valuation methodology for other biotech companies, we use a discount
rate of 11%. For products in development, this is effectively compounded up by the
risk adjustments applied to each product at different stages of development. Arguably,
however, using a discount rate of 11% to value those products already on the market
is overly conservative
May 24, 2007 Elan Corporation (ADR) (ELN)
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 7
Exhibit 1: Elan risk-adjusted DCF valuation
12-month risk-adjusted DCF price target of US$25/ADR; technology value US$27.4/ADR
Probability to Discount rate
Drug Phase Indication reach market 9% 10% 11% 12% 13% 17% 20%
Risk-adjusted NPVs
Maxipime Launched Bacterial infections 100% 156 155 155 154 153 150 148
Azactam Launched Bacterial infections 100% 97 97 96 96 95 93 92
Prialt Launched Pain 100% 53 50 47 44 42 34 29
Contract manuf & royalties Launched N/A 100% 1599 1455 1329 1218 1120 823 672
Autoimmune disease
Tysabri Launched MS, Crohn's 100% 8273 7639 7070 6558 6095 4635 3843
ELND001 Phase I Autoimmune diseases 5% 49 43 37 32 27 15 9
Neurodegeneration
Bapineuzumab Registration Alzheimer's Disease 75% 5190 4696 4256 3862 3509 2423 1857
ACC-001 Phase II Alzheimer's Disease 10% 24 21 18 15 13 5 2
LY-450139 Phase III Alzheimer's Disease 50% 123 111 100 91 82 56 43
Elan gamma secretase inhibitor Phase II Alzheimer's Disease 10% 33 29 26 23 20 12 8
ELND005 Phase II Alzheimer's Disease 10% 25 21 18 16 14 7 4
Beta secretase inhibitor Phase I Alzheimer's Disease 5% 11 9 8 7 6 3 2

Bapineuzumab and the R&D pipeline is a free option
According to our estimates, the current share price is justified by Elan’s existing
businesses, without any value for Bapineuzumab and the R&D pipeline. The value of
Maxipime, Azactam, Prialt, Elan Drug Technologies and Tysabri is US$16.3/ADR
(US$18.6/ADR pre debt) on our estimates – not far from the current share price – though
this is predicated mainly on Tysabri’s sales trajectory being relatively conservative. On our
estimates, there is little in the share price for the value of the R&D pipeline, including
Bapineuzumab, and as such the R&D pipeline represents an almost free option. There are
very low expectations, we believe, for a sub part E filing for Bapineuzumab. Therefore,
should the drug not be filed under this designation in the coming 12 months, we would
expect limited share price impact. However, if it is filed, we would expect a positive share
price impact.
In our view, the value of the tax losses is being overlooked
As of end-2006, Elan had US$2.83 bn of tax-loss carry forwards. Of this amount,
US$2.74 bn of tax-loss carry forwards do not expire for more than five years. In our view,
the value of this asset (which amounts to around 31% of the group’s current market value,
if all tax losses could be utilized, on an NPV basis) is being undervalued by investors.
Exhibit 2: Tax loss carry forwards and expiration dates
Expiry date Ireland US State US Federal ROW Total
One year $0.6mn - - $0.6mn
Two years $2.1mn - - $2.1mn
Three years $0.9mn - - $0.9mn
Four years $0.5mn $56.2mn - $56.7mn
Five years - $37.3mn - $37.3mn
More than 5 years $1,879.2mn $206.5mn $628.1mn $23.5mn $2,737.3mn
Total $1879.2mn $210.6mn $721.6mn $23.5mn $2,834.9mn
Source: 2006 20-F report.
May 24, 2007 Elan Corporation (ADR) (ELN)
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 8
Corporate tax rate is also an advantage
Aside from tax losses, Elan’s base in Ireland could provide it with an attractive tax rate
going forward. Any Irish manufacturing income from Elan or its subsidiaries qualifies for a
10% tax rate until 31 December 2010. Thereafter, the Irish corporation tax rate of 12.5% is
applicable. Non-trading income is taxed at 25%. In our view, being based in a jurisdiction
where there is such a favourable tax regime (which could significantly reduce Elan’s tax
burden if it reaches profitability and after tax-loss carry forwards are utilized) is an
advantage over many other pharma and biotech companies.
Breakeven in 2008, profitable from 2009
We forecast that Elan will reach breakeven at the operating level in 2008, though this is
dependent on the trajectory of Tysabri sales. On our forecasts, the group will remain
loss-making at the net income level in 2008, due to the impact of interest payments on the
group’s debt. However, we forecast that the group will report earnings at the operating
and net income level in 2009.
We assume US$1.2 bn of debt is repaid in 2011
From a cash flow perspective, we forecast that Elan repays over US$1.15 bn of debt, due in
2011. Should this occur, rather than the debt be re-financed, it could result in a cash outflow
in 2011 of US$560 mn. Should Elan re-finance all of this debt (which, if Tysabri
continues to grow as we expect, could potentially be re-financed at a lower interest rate), it
would result in a net cash inflow in 2011 of US$635 mn, on our estimates.
Exhibit 3:

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: quidditch who wrote (9387)5/25/2007 10:30:06 AM
From: fred hayes   of 10345
 
Thanks for posting the GS stuff...eom

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: tom pope5/25/2007 11:06:42 AM
   of 10345
 
lol, didn't someone say here a couple of days ago that it might take some time for the street to catch on to the changed situation with ELN, but that it would come?

I loved the post about Kelly Martin making the affiliate structure so complex that no one would even think of a takeover. It reminded me of my days as a trainee at Bankers Trust when I was tasked with analyzing LTV (LingTemcoVought). I had to phone the company to ask about an impenetrable footnote, explaining that I didn't understand it. The reply was "You're not supposed to."

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.