Biotech / Medical | Cambridge Heart (CAMH)-What is this???


Previous 10 
To: John Zwiener who wrote (23)4/2/1997 6:15:00 PM
From: James Perry   of 33
 
Sounds good, John. I was really impressed with CAMH during this sell off. Igen is down a little, but it hasn't moved much. To say that this market is only down a couple of points is bull. CYTC has moved from 28 to 18, and Human Genome just issued more stock at 37. It is at 30 right now. This, despite my impression that the biotechs have held up quite well as a group. We still have some profits out there - all it needs is some patience.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: James Perry who wrote (24)4/2/1997 8:47:00 PM
From: John Zwiener   of 33
 
Your right about the biotech selloff. Last I heard it's 7 or 8%. I really don't know much more than to check a company out, and if the price is right, buy and hold. Then follow for 3 or 4 years, checking the things that I thought gave the company the value. If things change, then I sell. And no matter what, I seem to be a year or so early,,,well maybe not all the time, but usually.

By the way, cytc is now 21 and hgsi is 32. But I would not be surprised if they got caught up in the downdraft again even though they seem to be worth more than they are now. By the way, I don't have maxba, but I did get the investors package and am trying to check it out, but it takes time. I did finally pick up some lgnd, the price was finally too tempting, even though I'm still trying to wade through all the stuff posted all the time. Ligand's investor package is a challenge, I asked for extra stuff and they sent it to me. Many papers on stuff that I was only peripherally aware of, so I'm having to learn another area. But what I've figured out so far is that it seems to be the real thing, at least some of it. Some of the data is relatively impressive and complete. I've had trouble with Isis finding enough data to be sure of what they claim. I am actually pleased with this selloff since I had been following a number of companies and they are coming into range very reasonable prices.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: John Zwiener who wrote (25)4/7/1997 7:24:00 PM
From: James Perry   of 33
 
John, did you see the recent note on Igen, referring to a news report in an Ohio paper. Think you would be interested, though it presents little new except to show the news is getting out. I do have questons about it which have not yet been answered. By the way, I was very attracted to Idxx at recent price. See you have picked up Lgnd. I have seen a LOT of hype on that stock. Is it loaded with goodies, or what?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: John Zwiener who wrote (25)4/10/1997 4:24:00 PM
From: James Perry   of 33
 
That is the rule I generally follow, and the experience I usually have. I did just make an exception on Informix (IFMX). They have a wonderful file program - works by image characteristics instead of ones and zeros - with Oracle as a competetor. When the price fell to 10 because of recent management miscalculations, I thought it was a raging buy. But various brokers have been rating it a short term sell and now Merrill Lynch has just put out a long term hold as well as a short term buy. The market has been pounding it, and I have just decided to take my 7.25 and leave that table. I am afraid it is going to do even worse, and I am not sure it will get better. Except for that stock, I just grit my teeth and wish the biotechs would do a bit better.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: James Silverman who wrote (12)9/11/1997 2:35:00 AM
From: John Zwiener   of 33
 
James, there is increasing activity in this stock, hear anything. I'm still a believer in this technology. Time frame has been moved back. We should be getting some new study results one of these days.

As you probably know, the particular study that was going to get rapid approval to claim they could pridict sudden death, was designed with the FDA's help. But the centers where they were conducting the study were doingcardiac caths immediately so that their instrument, which is a stress test, could not be run within the required timeframe. So they could not get enough patients with acute MI's. This is where the big population is and where the test is supposed to be best.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: James Silverman who wrote (12)4/3/1998 12:28:00 AM
From: John Zwiener   of 33
 
Haven't posted here for a while since no really new news. But now we are approaching report time. If you remember, the first attempt to run a trial for labelling approval to say something like "the finding of
t-alternans waves is correlated with an 85% risk of sudden death within one year (the patient is a candidate for a pacemaker)". That first trial was not able to accrue enough patients due to the trial design, and the location of the studies (the centers would immediately cath the patients preventing timely use of the instrument).

Now this time around, it looks like they have completed the study, or are getting close to it. If this study is anything like the smaller, scientific studies have continued to be, the results should be good. I think they are scheduled to present data in a month or two. Worth looking at again if you haven't lately.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: John Zwiener who wrote (29)8/23/1999 11:06:00 AM
From: celeryroot.com   of 33
 
BEDFORD, Mass.--(BW HealthWire)--Aug. 23, 1999--
Cambridge Heart Alternans Test Seen as Useful Diagnostic Tool
Cambridge Heart, Inc. (NASDAQ:CAMH) today announced that a study
published in the August Journal of the American College of Cardiology
(34(2); 374-380, 1999) found that the presence of microvolt T-wave
alternans (TWA), an alternating pattern in the heartbeat, was
correlated with that of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) in patients
with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The Cambridge Heart
Alternans Test is the only non-diagnostic test available that measures
T-wave alternans during routine exercise, pacing, or pharmacologic
stress. VT, a rapid heart beating in the ventricles, can give rise to
a life-threatening situation called ventricular fibrillation where the
lower chambers quiver and the heart cannot pump blood. Patients with
DCM suffer from a condition unrelated to coronary artery disease where
the heart becomes enlarged, weak and does not pump properly.
"These study findings are especially significant because invasive
electrophysiology study, the current gold standard in arrhythmia
diagnosis, is not considered useful in diagnosing patients with
non-ischemic DCM," said Jeffrey M. Arnold, Cambridge Heart Chairman,
President, and Chief Executive Officer. "Cambridge Heart's Alternans
Test gives physicians a non-invasive tool to help diagnose this
difficult-to-detect population in time to offer therapeutic
alternatives, such as drug therapy or cardioverter/defibrillator
implantation."
Cambridge Heart's Alternans Test is the only non-invasive test to
receive clearance by the Food and Drug Administration to identify
patients at risk of life threatening arrhythmias and subsequent sudden
cardiac death.
DCM, which often affects people in their forties and fifties, has
been considered a disease with a severe prognosis often leading to
either sudden cardiac death, or death from congestive heart failure.
DCM has a mortality rate of 25% to 50% in the first two years after
diagnosis, and approximately half of these deaths are sudden.
According to this study, T-wave alternans testing was the only
non-invasive test to reliably predict VT in this patient population.
Other tests, including invasive electrophysiology study and
non-invasive (1-8) signal-averaged ECG, QT dispersion, standard
exercise testing, heart rate variability, and echocardiography were
not useful in identifying DCM patients with life threatening
arrhythmias.
The study, titled "Determinant of Microvolt-Level T-Wave
Alternans in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy," by Adachi et al,
included 58 consecutive patients with DCM. All patients underwent a
complete non-invasive and invasive evaluation, including T-wave
alternans testing. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive
accuracy of T-wave alternans for VT were 88%, 72%, and 77%,
respectively.
About the Cambridge Heart Alternans Test
The Cambridge Heart Alternans Test measures extremely subtle
beat-to-beat fluctuations in a person's heartbeat called T-wave
alternans. T-wave alternans is not visible on electrocardiograms used
in conjunction with ordinary exercise stress tests. These tiny
heartbeat variations - measured at one millionth of a volt - are
detected during a typical treadmill or bicycle exercise stress test by
specially designed, high-resolution electrodes placed on a patient's
chest. Extensive clinical research has shown that patients with
symptoms of or at risk of life threatening arrhythmias who test
positive for T-wave alternans are at significant risk for subsequent
sudden cardiac events including sudden death.
About Cambridge Heart
Cambridge Heart is engaged in the research, development and
commercialization of products for the noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac
disease. Using innovative technologies, the Company is addressing such
key problems in cardiac diagnosis as the identification of those at
risk of sudden cardiac arrest, the early detection of coronary artery
disease and the prompt and accurate diagnosis of heart attack. The
Company, started in 1992, is based in Bedford, Mass., and is traded on
the NASDAQ/NMS under the symbol CAMH.
Statements made in this press release that are not historical
facts include forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. Important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking
statements include uncertainties associated with regulatory approval
processes and other factors that are included in Cambridge Heart's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 1998.
(1) Fei L, Goldman JH, Prasad K, et al. QT dispersion and RR
variations on 12-lead ECGs in patients with congestive heart failure
secondary to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J
1996;17:258-63.
(2) Hofmann T, Meinertz T, Kasper W, et al. Mode of death in
idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: a multivariate analysis of
prognostic determinants. Am J Cardiol 1988;116:1455-63,
(3) Larsen L, Markham J, Haffajee CI. Sudden death in idiopathic
dilated cardiomyopathy. PACE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
1993;16:1051-9.
(4) Berger RD, Kasper EK, Baughman KL, et al. Beat-to-beat QT
interval variability: novel evidence for repolarization lability in
ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation
1997;96:1557-65.
(5) Grimm W, Hoffmann J, Knop U, et al. Value of time- and
frequency-domain analysis of signal-averaged electrocardiography for
arrhythmia risk prediction in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. PACE
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996;19:1923-7.
(6) Grimm W, Steder U, Menz V, et al. QT dispersion and
arrhythmic events in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol
1996;78:458-61.
(7) Silverman ME, Pressel MD, Brackett JC, et al. Prognostic
value of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram and a prolonged QRS in
ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:460-4.
(8) Keeling PJ, Kulakowski P, Yi G, et al. Usefulness of
signal-averaged electrocardiogram in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
for identifying patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol
1993;72:78-84.
--30--kms/bos*
CONTACT: At Feinstein Kean Partners
Jeff Mooney, 617-577-8110
or
At Cambridge Heart
Robert Palardy, 781-271-1200 ext. 231
or
At Schwartz Communications
Helen Shik, 781-684-0770 ext. 6587
Lloyd Benson, 781-684-0770 ext. 6511

Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet
with Hyperlinks to your home page.
URL: businesswire.com 


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: celeryroot.com who wrote (30)3/16/2000 5:35:00 PM
From: Samuel J. Bennett   of 33
 
Confirmed today!!!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Samuel J. Bennett who wrote (31)7/21/2000 6:38:43 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw   of 33
 
Is anybody still here? Does anybody still care?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (32)7/21/2000 10:22:26 PM
From: george wohanka   of 33
 
Still care but have nothing to contribute.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.