Technology Stocks | Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: John Hayman12/7/2006 10:52:13 AM
1 Recommendation   of 152328
 
snip> Qualcomm advanced $1.48 to $40.66 after American Technology Research added the stock to its focus list. Wireless bandwidths may ``catch and possibly surpass wired performance'' by the end of the decade, analyst Albert Lin wrote in a note to investors. Qualcomm's value would increase if it becomes a top bandwidth creating company, according to Lin.<snip

U.S. Stocks Rise on Oil-Price Drop; Qualcomm, Chipmakers Gain

By Allen Wan

Dec. 7 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. stocks rose after oil prices retreated and an analyst recommended Qualcomm Inc., the world's second-biggest maker of mobile-phone chips.

The Standard & Poor's 500 Index advanced 3.01, or 0.2 percent, to 1415.91 as of 10:10 a.m. in New York. The Dow Jones Industrial Average increased 40.22, or 0.3 percent, to 12,349.47. The Nasdaq Composite Index was little changed, down 0.77 at 2445.09.

Oil fell as forecasts of mild winter temperatures in the U.S., the world's biggest oil consumer, outweighed the impact of a potential OPEC supply cut. Crude futures slipped 0.4 percent to $61.95 a barrel in electronic trading in New York.

Qualcomm advanced $1.48 to $40.66 after American Technology Research added the stock to its focus list. Wireless bandwidths may ``catch and possibly surpass wired performance'' by the end of the decade, analyst Albert Lin wrote in a note to investors. Qualcomm's value would increase if it becomes a top bandwidth creating company, according to Lin.

A measure of semiconductor-related companies rose 0.8 percent for the best performance among two dozen industry groups in the S&P 500.

Gains were limited before tomorrow's jobs report, which may provide clues on the pace of growth and whether the Federal Reserve will lower interest rates to spur the economy.

Upcoming Jobs Report

The Labor Department may say the jobless rate edged up to 4.5 percent last month from a five-year low of 4.4 percent, according to the median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. Employers probably hired 100,000 more workers, according to the survey.

Earlier today, the government said initial jobless claims fell to 324,000 last week. Economists expected a drop to 325,000.

Home Depot Inc. slid 45 cents to $39.47 after the world's biggest home-improvement retailer said it failed to record $200 million in expenses as a result of a two-decade long pattern of backdating stock-option grants to benefit employees.

Homebuilders declined after Credit Suisse Group downgraded the industry to ``underweight'' from ``market-weight'' because of concerns about price-earnings ratios, rising supply and worsening credit quality.

Ryland Group Inc. fell 50 cents to $55.98 after it was cut to ``underperform'' from ``neutral.''

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: John Hayman who wrote (146865)12/7/2006 12:06:13 PM
From: manalagi   of 152328
 
3G Comes To China?
Shu-Ching Jean Chen 12.07.06, 10:50 AM ET

Popular Videos



Deck The Halls
Hotel Stays For The Holidays
Following Borrowers Abroad
Small Manufacturing Research
Can Readers Report?

Related Quotes
CHL 40.52 - 0.80

CHU 11.99 + 0.13

QCOM 39.81 + 0.63






Most Popular Stories


Bitten By The Google Spider
Gallaher Shares Surge On Bid News
The Boss Entertains
Business Has A Prayer
Digital Power: Where's The Moolah?



Hong Kong - For years, one of the great high-stakes mysteries of the telecom world has been just when China would move toward issuing third-generation (3G) telecommunications technology licenses, an event that could open up a whole wild frontier for global telecom equipment vendors, as well as handset makers.

That puzzle might soon be solved, but the answer may not be what the industry is looking for, since the entire issue remains clouded by China's efforts to take its own separate path.

A corner of the curtain was lifted this week by some off-the-cuff remarks by two executives from the country's two fixed-line telecom operators, China Telecommunications and China Unicom (nyse: CHU - news - people ), who predicted that the timing could be just around the corner and that an announcement could come as early as this month.

The optimistic comments made Tuesday by Leng Rongquan, president of the country's largest fixed-line operator, China Telecom, and Zhuo Xusheng, CEO of China Netcom, its smaller rival, helped boosted China Telecom stock, with a one-day rise of 15% to a record close of HK $4.10, while China Netcom surged 8.5% to HK $16.16. Investors were betting both companies would get a 3G license, allowing them to get involved in the high-growth mobile sector.

Their shares posted more subdued activity on Wednesday and Thursday on worries over the additional financing burdens that could arise from costly investment in 3G technology and equipment.

The two Chinese telecom executives who discussed the prospects of 3G were speaking on the sidelines of a global telecom conference, International Telecommunication Union, which is being held this week in Hong Kong. It's the first time the group has met outside of Geneva since it was founded in 1971.

The Chinese executives have long been bullish about the timing for China to push for 3G development, despite delays of nearly three years. They are at the forefront of promoting 3G business as a way to tap new growth.

Their latest optimism was greeted by an industry that appears to believe almost unanimously that China will move to ensure the availability of 3G networks ahead of the Beijing Olympic Games in the summer of 2008.

"All these reports suggest China is trying to keep its promise to issue 3G licenses ahead of [the] Olympics," said Jing Wang, chairman for Asia Pacific at Qualcomm (nasdaq: QCOM - news - people ), the U.S. company whose technology powers most 3G devices.

But some long-time industry analysts also noticed a conflicting and more authoritative report released at the same time by China's official Xinhua News Agency, which quoted Wang Xudong, China's Minister of Information Industry, who said his ministry has no plans to restructure domestic telecommunications industry for 3G mobile licensing. "I haven't studied or contemplated the matter," Wang said.

Intriguingly, Wang himself was the one who raised hopes a year ago for a definitive 3G licensing by forecasting that 2006 was the year for the government to "finish formulating policies for the development of 3G technology and business."

Issuing 3G licenses in China would inevitably have to involve an industry-wide restructuring, because it would call for redistribution of assets among the country's four state-controlled telecom operators: China Telecom and China Netcom, as well as their two mobile counterparts, China Mobile and China Unicom.

All the mixed signals over the arrival of 3G service are a hallmark of China's telecom regulatory regime. "There is no transparency and clarity in China's 3G policy," said an analyst who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The issue is being compounded by Chinese worries over the commercial merits of 3G, the lack of home-grown technology and evolving domestic politics.

China has been keen to promote its own 3G technology standard, called TDS-CDMA, which is different from the two world standards, CDMA2000 and TW-CDMA. The repeated delays in issuing 3G license in part owe to the lack of any successful commercial products developed by China for the TDS-CDMA systems. (Chinese officials can be so stubborn to acknowledge that)

While the Ministry of Information Industry has been the industry regulator, its policy is also being influenced by the eventual state owner of all Chinese government-controlled companies, the powerful new state agency, State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission.

There are also worries about a Chinese decision that could limit the scale of 3G rollout to cover only the few million residents of Chinese cities that would help stage Olympic events: Beijing, Shanghai, Qingdao, Tianjin and Qinhuangdao.

With less than two years until the Beijing Olympics, Chinese telecom officials would have to make up their minds soon.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: seti who wrote (146852)12/7/2006 1:57:50 PM
From: Ruffian1 Recommendation   of 152328
 
and what a bummer for the US.....imho...........

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: edwin k. who wrote (146857)12/7/2006 1:59:21 PM
From: AlfaNut6 Recommendations   of 152328
 
How does beating up on Qualcomm help Nokia calm the competitive wave? The handsets of Nokia's competitors are desired by the market for reasons beyond just containing a Qualcomm chipset.

….If they are serious about getting ahead, they might be better off focusing their efforts on developing superior solutions. Couldn't that be the real problem?


Sorry, this is long. It's not just about making "superior solutions," it's also about the structure of the whole industry.

Let’s take a step back and look at both the tactical and strategic levels. Edwin K summed up a lot when he said “…the only real problem for NOK is the fact that it is losing the catbird seat to an American company.” Much of what I will write below says the same thing, with perhaps a different spin.

First, the tactical side. Nokia is taking whacks at QCOM as part of negotiating a license deal, i.e. how much will they pay in royalties. Nokia wants anything but to pay the “standard” rates to QCOM with the pass-through rights QCOM seems to demand. Why? A few reasons. First, if they pay less than their direct competitors they have a built in production price advantage, and this is a key competitive advantage not to be underestimated. Second, if they can get enough concessions from QCOM on licensing it may be enough that they be able to collect royalties like QCOM, thereby further enhancing whatever pricing advantage they may hold. (Note: For Nokia to go out and really start collecting WCDMA royalties would open a can of worms too large to go into here, and in the end I think it is highly doubtful, despite their stated intent.)

Now take a further step back to the strategic level of things. This is where QCOM is truly Nokia’s worst nightmare. First, QCOM being part of the WCDMA mix and commanding an IP position large enough to dictate royalties, hold pass through rights and supply chips, drives the entire phone manufacturing industry rapidly toward horizontal integration. (i.e. an industry in which a given company can only compete at one level of the value chain, such as making chips, or assembling phones.) Horizontal industries typically have a low barrier to entry at certain levels, i.e. you can sign a deal with QCOM, buy chips and become a phone maker. Whala! Competition as QCOM describes. QCOM has dramatically lowered the barriers to entry for phone manufacturers.

This is directly at odds with Nokia’s vertically integrated business, in which they research tech, design chips, make chips (or have made to their spec), assemble phones and sell them. For this type of structure to survive it must hold sufficient barriers to entry and be efficient enough at each level of the value chain that effective competition does not emerge.

So, all that said, QCOM helping drive the industry toward horizontal integration damages Nokia’s business model on virtually all fronts. To compete effectively it must do chips as well as QCOM, manufacture phones as efficiently as the best builders and offer the carriers leading edge bells and whistles. This isn’t so easy to guarantee into the future given the pace of QCOM R&D and the rise of Asian phone manufacturers. (Side note: driving this horizontally integrated industry model is a key reason for QCOM’s level of R&D as a strategic investment.)

To wind up these remarks, Nokia attacks QCOM’s IP and royalty position to gain both a key competitive cost advantage against other phone manufacturers, but also to gain as much “ownership” as possible in the standard in order to (hopefully) raise the barrier to entry for competitors, keep up with and help control the pace of technical innovation, and preserve the competitiveness of its internally developed chips and its existing business structure. If it’s no longer a competitive vertically integrated company then it’s just another phone assembler, and that is a business whose margins will become razor thin. If that happens, guess what? QCOM wins in a very big way – having the greatest control of the market by dominating the level of the value chain (chips) that determines what devices can happen and for which there is a huge barrier to entry. Attacking QCOM’s royalty and licensing terms is the only weapon, short of outperforming every specialist firm in the value chain, that Nokia has to try and preserve the competitive advantages it held in GSM.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: AlfaNut who wrote (146868)12/7/2006 2:08:33 PM
From: carranza23 Recommendations   of 152328
 
Good post.

In a nutshell, the difference between being defensive and offensive.

Once a company, like NOK, goes into defensive mode, trying to derail others instead of adapting and innovating, its goose is cooked. I know this sounds vaporous, but I don't have the time to fully explain myself in the same terrific way you did. Suffice it to say that what NOK is doing is a symptom, not actions intended to promote what it does and how it does it.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: carranza2 who wrote (146869)12/7/2006 2:25:51 PM
From: AlfaNut1 Recommendation   of 152328
 
You said in a few sentences what took me a page. Indeed, describing Nokia's actions as "symptoms" is a great metaphor.

It's truly classic - we are watching an industry transformation in real time rather than just reading about it in a HBS case study.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: AlfaNut who wrote (146870)12/7/2006 2:33:46 PM
From: Jon Koplik   of 152328
 
Stupid stock chart "gap" stuff -- we still have a small gap between yesterday's high ($39.38) and today's low (so far) ($39.48).

When we were up at almost $41.00 earlier today, I thought about mentioning this "gap crap," but ... figured it was so preposterous to worry about $39.38 when we were roughly $1.50 above it ...

As usual, this idiotic gap stuff seems to have a pervasive "pull."

Jon.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: carranza2 who wrote (146869)12/7/2006 2:40:49 PM
From: jimtracker11 Recommendation   of 152328
 
Textbook Gorilla game!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Jon Koplik who wrote (146871)12/7/2006 3:13:49 PM
From: Jon Koplik   of 152328
 
Okay -- we (or "they") filled the "gap."

J o n

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Jon Koplik who wrote (146871)12/7/2006 4:31:39 PM
From: estatemakr   of 152328
 
do I see red?? wow :-(

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.