Technology Stocks | WCOM


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: el paradisio who wrote (6984)7/3/2000 3:14:09 PM
From: JDN   of 11568
 
Dear El: It appears LD rates in and of themselves if anything will go down, but T is manuevering to raise "something" probably some kind of access type fee. JDN

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (6985)7/3/2000 3:15:29 PM
From: JDN   of 11568
 
Dear Jacob: Dont know what your URL was to as requires being a subscriber. JDN

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: JDN who wrote (6990)7/3/2000 3:18:59 PM
From: Jacob Snyder   of 11568
 
July 3, 2000




Senate Signals Opposition to Bid
For Sprint by Deutsche Telekom
By JOHN R. WILKE
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL


WASHINGTON -- Senate leaders signaled opposition to a possible attempted takeover of Sprint Corp. by German phone giant Deutsche Telekom AG.

In a sternly worded letter sent Friday to Federal Communications Commission Chairman William Kennard, 30 senators called any such bid by a foreign government-owned company "contrary to U.S. law, and inconsistent with our policy to promote competition and maintain a secure communications system for our national security."

The move introduces a new political element to the drama over the future of Sprint, which last year agreed to be acquired by WorldCom Inc. for $129 billion in stock. But the deal has been challenged by U.S. and European antitrust enforcers and is expected to fall apart.

The letter by Democrat Ernest F. Hollings of South Carolina won bipartisan support including Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott of Mississippi and Minority Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota.

"We are not opposed to foreign investment in U.S. communications forms," the senators wrote. "For example, there was no objections to Vodafone's purchase of AirTouch or France Telecom's holding a noncontrolling 10% interest in Sprint." But they noted that U.S. law bars transfer of FCC licenses to companies that are more than 25%-owned by a foreign government.

In recent years, the FCC has waived some ownership restrictions for World Trade Organization member countries, but the policy hasn't yet been tested by a major U.S. acquisition by a foreign government-owned company.

Mr. Kennard declined to comment on the matter Friday. But an FCC official acknowledged any such deal would get careful scrutiny.

"We're not going to prejudge anything. We would analyze any risk to competition and whether the transaction is in the public interest, just as we would do in any other deal," the official said Saturday.

The lawmakers' letter notes that other WTO-member countries also bar foreign government ownership of telecommunications companies. Italy, Spain and Hong Kong already impose restrictions, and "U.S. regulators should be similarly skeptical," the letter said.

Sen. Hollings last week introduced legislation that would forbid the FCC from waiving U.S. ownership restrictions for companies that are more than 25% government-owned, even if that government belongs to a WTO member. In introducing the bill, Sen. Hollings said that Deutsche Telekom "operates from a protected home market," as do the French and Japanese telephone firms, and that these companies would have an unfair advantage in the U.S. market. He also suggested that European regulators acted to protect the interests of government-owned companies. "Government ownership of commercial assets results in significant marketplace distortion," conferring easy access to capital and favorable interest rates, he said.

Deutsche Telekom, which retains monopoly power in its home market, is 59%-owned by the German government. Its executives have made no secret of their interest in a U.S. acquisition, and the company is believed to be the most likely bidder to step forward with a bid for Sprint, in which it already has a 10% stake. One Deutsche Telekom official, who said Sprint was discussed at a management board meeting of the German company last week, called the situation "a new alternative that we hadn't expected would arise."

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Sonny McWilliams who wrote (6986)7/3/2000 3:19:00 PM
From: JDN   of 11568
 
Dear Sonny: No, I didnt notice it and they didnt alert me. I will have to look for it.
Now, you didnt hear DT say it would be higher than WCOM's price, you heard financial press. I would be very surprised if it exceeded WCOM'S bid of $76. Probably would be restructured in some way anyhow so as to not be directly comparable. JDN

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (6991)7/3/2000 3:28:32 PM
From: JDN   of 11568
 
Dear Jacob: Well, FINALLY, we got bipartisan SOMETHING, and on the 4th of July Holiday, Great Timing!!
"won bipartisan support "
JDN

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Road Walker who wrote (6988)7/3/2000 4:41:37 PM
From: jim black   of 11568
 
Particular interest might increase if a foreign acquiring company were the krauts, whom we've beaten in two world wars and where still there exists a current quasi-Nazi pro-nationalist movement...I would find it particularly irksome and since I'm one quarter Bavarian German I can with immunity as an American call 'em krauts. My own government disgusts me with its actions in regards to the WCOM/FON deal
that I can TRULY sympathize with Jefferson's 20 year rule.
Jim Black

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (4)

To: jim black who wrote (6994)7/3/2000 6:37:08 PM
From: P.M.Freedman   of 11568
 
New bidders for FON will save WCOM billions for the break-up fees to FON.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: jim black who wrote (6994)7/3/2000 8:06:05 PM
From: Road Walker   of 11568
 
Jim,

JMHO, I don't think this has anything to do with political/social racism. Nationalism (patriotism?), it could turn on that perspective. But I don't think any particular country would be targeted because of WWII (or subsequent political leanings).

Somebody said "the business of America is business". The DOJ is a temporary obstruction to what is really happening, which is to make the world work in a more efficeint manner, regardless of who is in control.

John

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: jim black who wrote (6994)7/3/2000 8:06:06 PM
From: Road Walker   of 11568
 
Jim,

JMHO, I don't think this has anything to do with political/social racism. Nationalism (patriotism?), it could turn on that perspective. But I don't think any particular country would be targeted because of WWII (or subsequent political leanings).

Somebody said "the business of America is business". The DOJ is a temporary obstruction to what is really happening, which is to make the world work in a more efficeint manner, regardless of who is in control.

John

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: JDN who wrote (6989)7/3/2000 10:53:16 PM
From: el paradisio   of 11568
 
Dear JDN,no one will "buy" the access type fee from T any more.Competition will eat T for dinner,if Amstrong will not wake up.
Qwest and WCOM are getting stronger....a lot of small long distance companies are coming on the market.
Because of this excellent switches,from Excel Switching,which was bought by Lucent.........
I can have my own long distance company....in 6 month.
lucent-ssg.com 
Everything is ready....just get started....
Regards,el

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.