Politics | Ask Michael Burke


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (131626)4/8/2012 2:07:09 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation   of 132041
 
Why do you think they rage against legal gun ownership and defense laws?

Caught On Video: Black Crowd Laughs As White Tourist Beaten, Stripped And Robbed

Caught on camera– a tourist being beaten in downtown Baltimore and instead of helping him, a crowd laughs and steals his belongings.


breitbart.com 




h2k

Do I have to say anything? Everyone knows why details of this video have been suppressed.

·

Martin Brooks Smith

Where are Sharpton, Jackson, Spike Lee, and yes, where is Obama? I will tell you where he is, encouraging this kind of behavior while hiding behind the facade that he is the President of all Americans. I am completely disgusted.

·

M75462

This happens more often than not. Whites mugged and killed in plain view of a crowd. THe race war is here and it will be full on combat come this summer.


· mwaddell1

Oh yeah trust them to tell the truth. That's why somebody just got fired? Glad I live in Texas.

·

David Emmert

How about this.
toledoblade.com 





David Emmert

Or this.http:// www.bnd.com/2012/03/19/2106449...

·

David Emmert

Or this.http:// www.kctv5.com/story/17048649/t...

·

David Emmert

Or this.http:// www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16...

David Emmert

Or this.http:// www.telegraph.co.uk/news/world...

·

JarheadJohn

The Derrick Bell Disciples seem to be engaged and ready to play. encouraged by the media and the leftists, and all the way to the top of the White House, of course, According to Karen Finney, et al, only whites can be racist.

youtube.com 

jackstraw101

Yes, and in Denver and St Louis. Google the WI State Fair or the "knock out game" in St Louis. Also Philadelphia, the mayor had the courage to be vocal about it.

·

M75462

Yesterday two thugs bet a 78 year old man in Sanford....for Trayvon. Black chicks kick the crap out of white trannie in the same Baltimore, White man killed as he calls for a cab in front of Independence Hall.

I see Jackson and Shartpon and Obama fanning the flames, and when it hits the fan in Detroit and Chicago this summer, you come back and read this post again.

Here is one more for your number cruncher. Gun sales up sharply higher since Obama took office.

·

savetheplace

Does the name Eve Carson mean anything to you?

ScoutGunner

newsbusters.org 

White couple tortured for hours and murdered in Atlanta.

There are many more, you just have to seek other means of info than lame stream media

homelit

Milwaukee Wisconsin state fair, Philadelphia, Chicago - read the news bud!

·

Realityanvil

How about Knoxville, TN, you mindless jerk? Ever hear of Channen Christian? How about Chattanooga, TN where gangs of thugs, euphemistically called "flash mobs", roamed the downtown streets last year, beating and threatening anyone white who happened to be out? They have a mayor just like you. There are two examples. Why don't you go to Memphis or Birmingham and try to walk five blocks in ANY direction after dark?

·

JOe Dutra

Lock and load.

·

deathgoat

The war will come this fall then Barry wins, and the sheep finally figure out it was by fraud.


·

tim Austin

if Obama had a son he would look like these thugs

·

Croaking_Toad

Why do you think they rage against legal gun ownership and defense laws? It cuts into black culture of rape, pillage, and plunder of all other races.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Brian Sullivan who wrote (131650)4/8/2012 2:38:05 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation   of 132041
 
NBC's defense of fired producer

by Rick Moran April 7, 2012
americanthinker.com 

NBC has fired the producer responsible for splicing together snippets from George Zimmerman's 911 call to make it appear that his shooting of Trayvon Martin was racially motivated.

NBC aired the edited tape on the Today Show. Media Decoder:

The segment in question was shown on the "Today" show on March 27. It included audio of Mr. Zimmerman saying, "This guy looks like he's up to no good. He looks black."

But Mr. Zimmerman's comments had been taken grossly out of context by NBC. On the phone with a 911 dispatcher, he actually said of Mr. Martin, "This guy looks like he's up to no good. Or he's on drugs or something. It's raining and he's just walking around, looking about." Then the dispatcher asked, "O.K., and this guy - is he white, black or Hispanic?" Only then did Mr. Zimmerman say, "He looks black."

The network "apologized" for the "error" and then two days later, fired the producer of the segment.

Is there any way that the editing could be construed as an innocent mistake?

Inside NBC, there was shock that the segment had been broadcast. Citing an anonymous network executive, Reuters reported that "the 'Today' show's editorial control policies - which include a script editor, senior producer oversight and in most cases legal and standards department reviews of material to be broadcast - missed the selective editing of the call."

But one day later it dismissed a Miami-based producer who had worked at NBC for several years.

The people with direct knowledge of the firing characterized the misleading edit as a mistake, not a purposeful act.

Tom Maguire points out that NBC is virtually forced to say that the editing was a "mistake" because to admit to a deliberate act would leave them open to legal issues -- like a fat, juicy defamation suit from Zimmerman.

So what are the chances that a "script editor, senior producer oversight and in most cases legal and standards department review" would have missed this blatant attempt to portray Zimmerman as a racist?

NBC needs to clear the air on this matter.



Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: joseffy who wrote (131656)4/8/2012 3:02:55 AM
From: Bilow2 Recommendations   of 132041
 
Hi joseffy; Re the NBC version of the Zimmerman tape.

Clearly if their brains had been turned on they'd have known that editing the tape that way would get them into a lot of trouble. And NBC did come down pretty hard on someone they held responsible. So I don't think that the people who did it, did it deliberately (that is, in order to amplify racial conflict, or to get Zimmerman into trouble or whatever). This is not an example of a well prepared biased report. It's a complete disaster for the people who made it. Instead, I think that they shortened the segment for the simple reason that they gave, to make it shorter.

I think their bias shows not in their motivation for shortening the tape in a biased manner, but in the fact that they didn't immediately realize that by shortening the tape in this way, they were biasing their broadcast. Their bias was in (internally) concluding racism from the evidence available. For them, (at least before they gave it any thought) their broadcast simply showed the evidence that was plainly obvious from the totality of all the evidence. Why else would a "white" person shoot an unarmed black person?

It's incredibly difficult for people to set aside their own opinions and look at things from an even perspective. And the news media is very left wing. So it's natural that they get into this sort of trouble. It's impossible to expect to get unbiased news from an organization which has hired personnel all with matching biases. This is true even when the biased people are not deliberately biasing their reports.

-- Carl

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (5)

To: Bilow who wrote (131657)4/8/2012 3:55:53 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation   of 132041
 
Nameless Scapegoat Watch:

By Mickey Kaus 4/8/2012
dailycaller.com 


1) WaPo‘s Erik Wemple wonders why NBC didn’t quickly come clean about its so-bad-it-seems-intentional mis-edit of the Zimmerman 911 call. Why not immediately “go into detail on exactly what had happened and what disciplinary measures would be taken”? I suspect the answer has something to do with the possibility of a libel suit from Zimmerman. As JustOneMinute‘s Tom Maguire reminded me, when you publish something so bad you face a giant adverse defamation verdict–well that’s exactly when you try not to fire the reporter or editor responsible. If you fire them, they’re likely to cut a separate deal with the plaintiff and testify in court about how sloppy your editorial practices were, how you had it in for plaintiff all along, etc. You keep the reporter close, however incompetent they’ve proven to be. You can fire them later. Like other tort laws, libel laws are in practice the enemy of transparency. …

2) How long will the now-fired Nameless Scapegoat editor remain nameless? Not long, I’d guess. … Also, did NBC offer a can-we-still-be-friends monetary… cushion along with the dismissal? …

3) In this case, I suspect the N.S. might have some valuable information to offer a plaintiff’s lawyer. Like how maybe there was a surge of enthusiasm at, yes, the highest levels of NBC News for turning this story into a clear cut emotional morality play (fueled by trendy social media!) and riding it to higher ratings for days, if not weeks. If you go to the March 20 Nightly News broadcast (available here) you can see NBC’s Ron Allen letting viewers imagine the racial epithet Zimmerman used for the man he was following. Oh, wait. …

The N.S. was reportedly a “seasoned” producer. Seasoned producers (and reporters) know what the bosses want. …

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Bilow who wrote (131657)4/8/2012 4:51:31 AM
From: joseffy3 Recommendations   of 132041
 
THE most divisive president in US history. Dividing Americans by race, income, gender.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: joseffy who wrote (131655)4/8/2012 10:18:59 AM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations   of 132041
 
animals, liberals have turn humans in the inner cities to animals.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Bilow who wrote (131657)4/8/2012 10:22:21 AM
From: longnshort4 Recommendations   of 132041
 
they did in on purpose, being so arrogant and they figured the other lib networks would cover for them. They just don't realize how strong the internet and bloggers are.

Look at Dan Rather and his slime on Bush with that fake fax.

We needed the internet when Clinton was President to expose all his lies.

Hell we needed it when Cronkite was lying to Americans every night

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Bilow who wrote (131657)4/8/2012 12:04:21 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation   of 132041
 
NBC's Nameless Scapegoat Raises More Questions








by John Nolte
Like Rathergate, Edit-Gate is a New Media-driven story pushed so hard (including here at the Bigs) that the mainstream media can no longer ignore it.

The result has been some action on the part of NBC News, but nowhere near enough. But hey, if NBC prefers death by a thousand paper cuts as opposed to biting the bullet and simply doing the right thing, that's fine by me.

At first NBC News thought they could make us go away by admitting the "error." The "error," of course, being the malicious, race-baiting edit of 911 audio in order to make a private citizen, who is currently in hiding for fear of his life, look racist.

Then NBC News thought an apology might end the growing firestorm.

Then, finally, just like a White House with something to hide about Fast and Furious, news was leaked late Friday that NBC had finally fired the producer responsible for this unpardonable act.

The Washington Post's Erik Wemple, who has been the mainstream media exception in doing a superb job of covering this scandal, put the news of last night's firing this way:

Yet it’s not sewn up. We still don’t know the name of the dismissed producer; we don’t know if the network gave any consideration to apologizing directly to Zimmerman; we don’t know if warnings were issued to other NBC employees; and so on.

NBC could have headed off this story sprawl by publishing a fuller account of the incident ealier [sic] this week. Since it failed to do so, this scandal will have a life well beyond Easter.

Yes, that's right, just for starters, NBC News refuses to name the fired producer responsible.

And that, by any reasonable standard, is nothing more than a cover up.

To think that this biased, irresponsible, race-baiter can now freely move about the cabin and get a job anywhere in the news business, free from public scrutiny, is a cover up.

Moreover, if NBC won’t name the producer, how in the world are we supposed to know someone has actually been fired?

But the biggest problem for NBC News is that a single unnamed sacrificial scapegoat doesn't begin to pay for the deliberate crime of throwing gasoline on a racial fire that was already raging.

Edit-Gate didn’t occur in the fever swamps of MSNBC. This happened on the oh-so-storied "Today Show," which means that there are only two ways this was allowed to happen:

1. The checks and balances at the "Today Show" are so lax that one person can push something like this on the air without anyone noticing -- at least until New Media smells a rat.

2. There are checks and balances, but this was ALLOWED to go through purely for the partisan political purpose of aiding and abetting Obama's push to gin up his base in a crucial swing state.

Not only do we need to know HOW a scandal that makes Rathergate look like just another piece of biased reporting was allowed to happen; we also need to know WHO allowed it to happen.

It doesn't matter if the answer to the above question is one, two, or all of the above. Either someone who needs to be fired put a wildly irresponsible system in place, or a whole bunch of people who need to be fired allowed this travesty to skim through.

Either way, more people need to be fired, most especially the person who sits at the desk where the NBC buck ultimately stops.

With their Friday night "nameless producer" dump, NBC News has only disgraced itself more, and still the network insists that the malicious edit was an "error" and not done deliberately, which of course is absolute nonsense.

This intentional attempt to gin up racial hatred and division is not only the slander of a private citizen (and the poisoning of a jury he might someday meet) but an attack on every citizen of this country -- and we deserve more than a nameless sacrificial scapegoat.

NBC News should immediately remove itself from this investigation and appoint a neutral panel to not only fully investigate the matter, but to reveal their findings to the public and ensure accountability is meted out to all those responsible.

If NBC and the "Today Show" are at all interested in rebuilding anything resembling a reputation, this is the only acceptable first step in what will be a very long journey.

P.S. Don’t think for a second we've forgotten about you, CNN, ABC, and New York Times. You're all part of Edit-Gate, and there will be a reckoning.

breitbart.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: longnshort who wrote (131662)4/8/2012 9:58:22 PM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations   of 132041
 

At first NBC News thought they could make us go away by admitting the "error." The "error," of course, being the malicious, race-baiting edit of 911 audio in order to make a private citizen, who is currently in hiding for fear of his life, look racist.

Then NBC News thought an apology might end the growing firestorm.

Then, finally, just like a White House with something to hide about Fast and Furious, news was leaked late Friday that NBC had finally fired the producer responsible for this unpardonable act.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Brian Sullivan who wrote (131650)4/9/2012 11:09:23 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation   of 132041
 
New Black Panthers Call for Bloody Race War

New Black Panthers Call for Bloody Race War

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.