SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Gold/Mining/Energy | coastal caribbean (cco@)


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Edwin S. Fujinaka who wrote (2878)6/18/2001 3:17:34 AM
From: Edwin S. Fujinaka   of 4686
 
Miami Herald finally mentions Coastal Petroleum and even Coastal Caribbean. But they don't mention the stock, CCO or COCBF. Even so, the story should be good for a modest run up on Monday morning and if the major media begins to focus in on the story of the Coastal Petroleum Court Case we could see some major moves. I've sent the story of the Oil & Gas Journal Article by Azad out along with the Miller Oil Court Settlement in Michigan to several people in the media in the past with no results.

Normally I would follow up and send a package of additional information out to the reporter who wrote the Miami Herald Story, but since I have changed to a low profile mode I have been restraining myself in recent months. I have mixed feelings about this strategy but I think that the law firm may have a similar perspective. Still, I would enjoy having the stock at a somewhat higher value before we get into the jury phase of the case to discuss damages. What do you other people think?

BTW, mention of the Miami Herald Article was first on Raging Bull and I am just reposting it here:

miami.com 

Published Sunday, June 17, 2001
Battle over offshore drilling at critical point

--------------------

PETROLEUM and POLITICS
Florida doesn't now allow offshore drilling, but oil companies with leases and a lot at stake are crying `foul.'

BY MIMI WHITEFIELD
mwhitefield@herald.com


There was a time when sleepy Florida dreamed of Texas-like gushers to propel its economy.

It even offered a $50,000 reward to the first company to make a major oil strike in Florida and granted offshore oil and gas leases that ran right up to its powdery west coast beaches.

But it's been nearly 60 years since Humble Oil collected the reward and Florida's attitude toward drilling has changed dramatically.

Now the future of three major offshore leases are in play -- posing a challenge to tourism-dependent Florida's assertion that there should be no drilling for oil and gas in Florida waters because of the environmental risk.

Lease Sale 181 -- six million acres of oil-and-gas-rich seabed that the federal government wants to auction off in December -- has been grabbing recent headlines because it pits Gov. Jeb Bush, who opposes drilling in the entire eastern Gulf, against his brother, President George W. Bush.

But two other leases pose a more immediate risk to Florida's coffers. By this fall, the Commerce Department is expected to rule on whether Chevron can begin drilling in the Destin Dome -- a huge natural gas field 25 miles south of Pensacola that lies in federal waters.

Chevron U.S.A. has filed a lawsuit asking for hundreds of millions of dollars to go away if Florida doesn't allow it to exercise its lease.

Another case involving Coastal Petroleum, a small Apalachicola company with only one paid employee, has been winding its way through circuit court in Tallahassee since January. The company, one of 15 major oil companies and independents that bought oil and gas leases in the 1940s, has been battling the state over its leases for years.

It is no longer fighting for the right to drill. It already lost that battle in court. But now it contends that the state's prohibition on drilling constitutes an illegal taking of its property rights to explore for oil and gas, and it wants compensation.

``The only thing we want to show is that the state can't have it both ways,'' said Cary Gaylord, a Tampa attorney representing Coastal.

The state, he said, has refused to issue a permit allowing Coastal to explore for oil and gas, but also balked at compensating it for the loss of its property rights. Coastal has been making lease payments -- now nearly $60,000 per month -- to the state since the 1940s.

Last month a state motion to have Coastal's suit dismissed was denied. Coastal would like to see the case proceed to a jury trial as soon as possible.

The suit involves only one of Coastal leases -- Lease 224-A, a three-mile wide band between 7.36 and 10.36 miles off Florida's west coast. The 400,000-acre tract stretches from Pasco County to Apalachicola and includes a site off St. George Island -- a barrier island known for its white-sand beaches and pricey real estate -- where Coastal applied for and was denied a drilling permit by the state.


UNSPECIFIED AMOUNT
The company has studiously avoided saying how much it thinks the fair market value of Lease 224-A is, but it's clear the amount it has in mind is substantial.
In a letter to shareholders last year, Benjamin W. Heath, president of Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals Ltd., Coastal's Bermuda-based parent company, gave a hint: ``The leases are very valuable assets; therefore many millions of dollars are at stake.''

The main assets of Caribbean Oils & Minerals, a publicly traded company, are its 59.25 percent interest in Coastal Petroleum, and Coastal's assets are its Florida leases and royalty interests.

Although Coastal has never discovered commercial quantities of oil and gas despite exploratory drilling from 1947 until the late 1960s, Philip Ware, Coastal's president, said he's confident the use of deep-water technology could yield billions of barrels of oil.

``There is no doubt in my mind that oil is there,'' said Ware. ``The leases are giants. All the major oil companies would love to be in here. It was never a matter of potential, but rather politics: Can you really drill there in Florida?''

At this point the answer is no.

The state has long held that there should be no drilling within 100 miles of Florida's coast and Gov. Bush has said the prudent course is to keep drilling out of the entire eastern Gulf of Mexico.

The state policy is the same whether it concerns Chevron, Coastal Petroleum or other companies that may bid on Sale Lease 181. ``Our policy is very consistent -- no drilling,'' said Lucia Ross, a spokeswoman for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.

However, a report on natural gas issues presented to the Interior Department's Minerals Management Service's Outer Continental Shelf Policy Committee last month recommended studying whether the current moratorium on new leasing off Florida's shores should be lifted.

While gas lines and oil and gas rigs lace the Gulf of Mexico off the coasts of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama, it's almost as if Florida has erected a huge ``Keep Out'' sign in the ocean.


CHANGE OF HEART

But when Coastal, then known as Arnold Oil Explorations, was formed in 1940, the state's attitude was different.

Coastal was granted oil, gas and mineral leases and royalty interests on millions of acres of submerged lands -- including Lake Okeechobee and along Florida's west coast from Marco Island all the way to Apalachicola.

``When the leases were acquired by Coastal, state officials were openly enthusiastic about the possibility of Florida becoming an oil-producing state,'' Heath, 86, wrote to shareholders last year.

By the late 1960s, however, the state's attitude toward offshore drilling began to shift, and it challenged the validity of Coastal's leases. The company has been in court ever since, battling everything from drilling permits to surety bonds.

The state further toughened its offshore drilling stance in 1990 when Gov. Bob Martinez and the cabinet approved a policy prohibiting production of oil and gas on the state's submerged lands. Florida waters extend 10 miles off the coast.

Through the years, Coastal has been something of a ``paper tiger,'' contends Mark Ferrulo, director of the Florida Public Interest Research Group, an environmental and consumer organization that opposes offshore drilling. ``We thought they were trying to greenmail the state all along.

Meanwhile, Coastal attorneys are watching carefully what happens with Lease Sale 181, an Idaho-shaped tract whose northern tip is within 15 miles of Florida beaches.

A final environmental impact statement is expected to be issued late this month or in early July. Barring problems or a change of heart, the federal Department of Interior is expected to issue a proposed notice of sale in July.

``Clearly if some portion of the Gulf is opened up under President Bush's plan that would be evidence,'' helpful in determining possible compensation for Coastal, said Gaylord.


RARE OCCURRENCE

Lease Sale 181 has the distinction of being the only proposed Eastern Gulf lease in the Interior Department's' current five-year oil and gas leasing program.

The last lease auctioned off in the Eastern Gulf was Sale 116 in November 1988. More than 46 million acres, divided into 8,000 blocks, were up for grabs. Bidders offered $41.5 million for 657,000 acres.

Chevron, which bid on blocks in the eastern and central area of Destin Dome, was among the successful bidders.

Now the Commerce Deparment file on the Chevron case is complete. A final environmental impact statement, a study on the effects on endangered plant and animal species, and an analysis related to water and air quality have all been filed.

Interested parties have until the end of the month to respond. Then Commerce has 90 days to decide whether production can start. Even if it asks for a 45-day extension, there should be a decision by mid-November.

``The Chevron case sometimes gets second billing to Lease Sale 181, but it really should be the governor's top priority,'' said the PIRG's Ferrulo.

Not only are Chevron and its partners ready to drill, but there are dozens of other companies with active oil and gas leases off the Panhandle coast waiting in the wings.

``There's a potential domino effect'' if Chevron is successful, he said. ``The pending decision represents the pinnacle of the 20-year battle to keep Florida's beaches rig-free. It would be the first full-scale drilling operation in our waters.''

To guard against that, Florida Democratic Sens. Bob Graham and Bill Nelson have introduced a bill that would prevent the Secretary of Interior from issuing leases off Florida waters, including the Lease Sale 181 area.

There's also a provision allowing the Secretary of Interior to buy back existing leases in the Destin Dome and other possible offshore drilling sites.

``Sacrificing a priceless landscape is not the way to answer this country's long-term energy needs,'' Graham said.

© 2001 The Miami Herald and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved.
miami.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Edwin S. Fujinaka who wrote (2880)6/18/2001 4:15:26 AM
From: Edwin S. Fujinaka   of 4686
 
I changed my mind, and sent the Miami Herald Reporter, Mimi Whitefield, the two key articles that give a hint to valuation. The first is the Oil & Gas Journal Article:

Reference #1 Oil & Gas Journal. February 8, 1999

ogj.pennnet.com 


Oil&Gas JournalVolume 97, Issue 6 (Feb 08, 1999) In This Issue

Apalachicola embayment may be continent's last virgin oil basin
Jamil AzadAzad Exploration Ltd.Calgary

"...These large reefs are in 35-60 ft of water and at depths of 12,500-18,000 ft. Costs are around $8 million/well. Upside are possible tens of billions of barrels of produced oil, but the catch is that only one opportunity exists to test this entire play..."

And also:

Reference #2 Detroit Free Press. May 9, 1998
freep.com 


"Sellout on dunes? In fact it looks like best of a bad deal
When Michigan taxpayers were stuck with paying more than $90 million to preserve the Nordhouse Dunes, environmentalists and others said John Engler pulled a fast one
May 9, 1998
BY DAWSON BELL
Free Press Lansing Staff
The story of the Nordhouse Dunes has an easy plot line. It goes like this:
Site of publicly owned natural wonder is under attack by greedy oil developers. Developers, rebuffed by state officials, file suit. Anti-environmental governor abandons stewardship of the Lake Michigan coastline resource, negotiates secret deal to pay off developers -- who happen to be big political contributors. Environmental ruin follows.
It's easy. It appears to be widely believed.
It also is wrong..."

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Edwin S. Fujinaka who wrote (2881)6/18/2001 11:49:35 AM
From: Howard C.   of 4686
 
Good move. The article more than just "mentions" Coastal, they feature it. The cat is out of the bag, and now is the time to get OUR SIDE out to the public. Even "radical environmentalists" like myself will become outraged when the authoritarian tactics of the State of Florida are revealed. And also, this way, they should not forget to include sufficient funding for any potential State buyout.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Howard C. who wrote (2882)6/18/2001 12:09:37 PM
From: Edwin S. Fujinaka   of 4686
 
The Miami Herald is still not really National Press coverage like Barron's or the Wall Street Journal. Past coverage in the Journal did not really take Coastal Caribbean seriously so perhaps this morning's lack of interest is not too surprising. We need a serious analyst to make the sort of calculations that I have suggested. A potential triple digit stock price has to be projected and no serious analyst (other than me <G>) has made such a calculation. I guess my $1000/share figure is too much fantasy to be taken seriously. I do think that 10% of that is not so far out and that gives us $100/share. I can hardly wait to see what the lawyer's come up with. They have been pretty coy about the dollars so far.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Edwin S. Fujinaka who wrote (2881)6/18/2001 12:24:49 PM
From: ferdberfel   of 4686
 
Glad I read your other posts as I was about to contact the writer at the Herald and still may do so. I think we need as much exposure as possible. If the local media deals with the issue enough the national media will eventually be forced to pick up the story.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ferdberfel who wrote (2884)6/18/2001 1:49:42 PM
From: Edwin S. Fujinaka   of 4686
 
It doesn't hurt to have several people write to the media. Email has made it so easy. Although I concur with the apparent strategy of the Company and our lawyers to keep this somewhat low profile during the taking part of the case, I would like to see the stock price at least a little higher while we wait. For that, we need at least a little exposure in the media and the press. Probably the best we can do with our own aggressive efforts is to just generate a little exposure in the mainstream media.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Edwin S. Fujinaka who wrote (2885)6/19/2001 12:52:41 PM
From: DrAllan   of 4686
 
To All
Lots of volume today but the stock is tricking down..any ideas?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: DrAllan who wrote (2886)6/19/2001 1:45:22 PM
From: Edwin S. Fujinaka   of 4686
 
Perhaps the Miami Herald Article triggered a run---to the exit <G>. The volume is interesting. So far today (with no trading for the last two hours) CCO shows 106,500 shares, but only 37,000 were actually on the Boston Stock Exchange under Schwab Symbol CCO.B. I'm not certain, but I guess this implies a lot of the trading was off the Boston Exchange. Usually almost all of the CCO trading is on the Boston Exchange. The Over the Counter Market only shows 60,800 shares for COCBF with the last trade there at 11:41 AM. The last trade for CCO was around 11:25 AM. That last trade for COCBF was at $1.25 with a bid of $1.20 and an asked of $1.25. The low for the day was only $1.10. So what does this tell us? Who the hell knows.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Edwin S. Fujinaka who wrote (2887)6/19/2001 2:54:00 PM
From: Howard C.   of 4686
 
Well, that's what happens when we get "good exposure" what's gonna happen when we get bad news? I wonder what the thought process is to sell a stock with this much potential. But since when does logic play a part in Wall Street?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Howard C. who wrote (2888)6/19/2001 3:14:12 PM
From: Edwin S. Fujinaka   of 4686
 
It's only academic whether they develop ANWR or not as far as our Florida Case is concerned. It is nice to see that some people are looking for alternatives to begging OPEC for favors though.

adn.com 

Toohey's appointment sparks cry of conflict in House
INTERIOR: Secretary's new assistant, however, finds support with Alaska's delegation.

By Liz Ruskin
Anchorage Daily News

(Published June 19, 2001)
Washington -- A Massachusetts congressman says Interior Secretary Gale Norton committed "an ethical oil spill" when she chose Cam Toohey, director of the group lobbying to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling, as her special assistant for Alaska.

"This appointment, which places a lobbyist for the oil industry in charge of our public lands in Alaska, is breathtaking in its arrogance towards the public interest, and a new low point for the Bush Administration," Rep. Edward Markey said in a written statement Monday. Markey, a Democrat, is the lead House opponent to opening the refuge to oil exploration.

Alaska's congressional delegation, though, said Norton made an excellent choice in Toohey.

Toohey started work for Norton on Monday, a government spokesman said.

Last week, he was director of Arctic Power, a state-funded group dedicated to urging Congress to allow oil development on the refuge's coastal plain.

In Anchorage on Saturday, Norton also announced that she is appointing Drue Pearce, a former president of the Alaska Senate, to be her senior adviser on Alaska affairs. Pearce's job will be based in Washington, while Toohey will work primarily in Alaska.

Neither post requires congressional confirmation. Pearce is to start Aug. 1.

Alaska Rep. Don Young and Sens. Ted Stevens and Frank Murkowski said Toohey's experience with Arctic Power and as an aide to the Alaska Senate Finance Committee has prepared him well for the job.

"His working relationships with the resource industries of Alaska will serve Secretary Norton and the state of Alaska now and in the future," Young said.

The Resources Development Council, the Teamsters and the Arctic Slope Regional Corp. all issued statements supporting the appointments.

Mano Frey, executive president of the Alaska AFL-CIO, said he didn't get Markey's criticism.

"Why? For whatever reason would that be a conflict of interest?" Frey said. Toohey's appointment is no different than when President Clinton appointed Deborah Williams, an environmentalist, to the job.

But Markey says Toohey's appointment presents a conflict.

"What better place to carry out Arctic Power's agenda than from the suite of the interior secretary herself?" he asked.

The Interior Department manages 270 million acres of federal land in Alaska. It includes the Bureau of Land Management, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Park Service and the Bureau of Indian Affairs. The Fish and Wildlife Service is the lead agency carrying out the controversial federal subsistence law, which gives a priority to rural Alaska residents in subsistence hunting and fishing.

Norton spoke to Interior Department employees Monday at the Alaska Center for the Performing Arts in Anchorage. The 9 a.m. talk was open to employees only.

Peggy Fox, the service's deputy assistant regional director for subsistence management, said she asked Norton whether she would try to get the state to adopt its own rural preference so that the federal government can return hunting and fishing management to the state.

Norton said she was unclear what her involvement would be on subsistence because she worked on a subsistence lawsuit before she took office, Fox said.

The Alaska Legislature last year hired Norton to support the state's appeal of the landmark Katie John decision. The court ruling she tried to overturn was a victory for village subsistence users because it forced the Fish and Wildlife Service to take over fisheries management to guarantee the rural preference on federal lands and waters.

While Norton was speaking inside, protesters gathered outside the theater to protest drilling on ANWR's coastal plain.

Toohey's position is the highest-ranking Interior Department job in the state. He was traveling Monday on the North Slope and could not be reached by telephone, his former office said.

Under the Clinton administration, Williams and then Marilyn Heiman held the job. Williams, an attorney and a dedicated environmentalist, was teaching at Alaska Pacific University when she was appointed. After she quit in a disagreement over subsistence policy, she became director of the Alaska Conservation Foundation, a group that gives money to environmental causes. Heiman now works for the administration of Gov. Tony Knowles, as she did before she was chosen for the federal job.

Anchorage Daily News reporter Elizabeth Manning contributed to this story. Reporter Liz Ruskin can be reached at 1-202-383-0007 or lruskin@adn.com.

Copyright © 2001 The Anchorage Daily News (www.adn.com)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.