Technology Stocks | Apple Inc.


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Lahcim Leinad who wrote (131351)4/18/2012 11:57:55 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw1 Recommendation   of 154308
 
Sweet! Nice find.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: JP Sullivan who wrote (131355)4/19/2012 12:33:34 AM
From: XoFruitCake   of 154308
 
Say even if Apple decides to play policeman, how will it know when a parent is blaming their kids for a purchase they themselves made (and now regret and want reversed)?
I think if the scenario were "my friend broke into my Ipad and use my Apple store ID to make purchase of $1000 in-line purchase. I want Apple to reimburse my money and ban all in-line app purchase or limit the size of in-line app purchase", all of us will have a collective "huh, really??" moment. In our justice systems, if my friend broke into my computer and make purchase, it is a) my responsibility to protect my computer and b) I should go after my friend either legally or personally for him/her to pay for the purchase. And in our culture, kids is the parent's responsibility. But somehow because a kid is involve, Apple or the app owner is the boogey man and has to pay of the illegal purchase...It only happen in America 8-))

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: XoFruitCake who wrote (131363)4/19/2012 1:10:21 AM
From: Win-Lose-Draw1 Recommendation   of 154308
 
It only happen in America

I'm not in America.


The concept is simple - if in-app purchases are more trouble than they're worth, people will avoid them, which is bad for Apple. Therefore it is in Apple's interest to help ensure such apps are not, in fact, more trouble than they're worth.

In our case, it's too late, and we now have a zero-tolerance policy on any apps that include in-app purchases. Why? Because they're just not worth the hassle.


YMMV.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (131364)4/19/2012 1:23:17 AM
From: XoFruitCake1 Recommendation   of 154308
 
I'm not in America.
heh heh, I am not referring to you. How you take care of your children is your business. I just don't understand why you want to post it in a msg board where you know that 1/2 of the people won't agree with you. Cogito has made it very clear that your parenting style is not up for discussion in his thread and I respect his decision.

There is a lawsuit going on that Zax posted in the Tanker thread that is exactly on this point. I liken it to that my kid breaks my neighbor window, I contend that my neighbor is at fault because his window is within my children throwing distant of his baseball.. The fact that I allow kids to play on the street and the fact that my kid actually did the damage has no bearing. Like I said, only in America. And it will make a big difference on how apps will be developed in the future. Cutting out the in-app purchase because 1 to 2% of user cannot control their own impulse buying will affect the rest of us and the 98-99% of users will all have to pay for the same apps in the future. And in my view, high quality free apps is Apple ticket to semi-monopoly in the global war for dominance in mobile device.

Message 28090923

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (131344)4/19/2012 1:39:53 AM
From: Doren   of 154308
 
Question for Win-Lose-Draw in app purchase.


The purchases your kids made did not require a password or credit card #?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Lahcim Leinad4/19/2012 7:28:51 AM
   of 154308
 
Qualcomm has banner Q2 results based on 3G, 4G phones | Electronista

In addition to its Snapdragon processors, Qualcomm supplies cellular chipsets for Apple's immensely popular iPhone 4S and iPad, as well as for an array of Android smartphones and tablets. The company also anticipates increased demand for its processors it makes when Windows 8 is introduced, as that will be the first desktop OS to support ARM processors.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: Lahcim Leinad4/19/2012 7:30:28 AM
   of 154308
 
Report: Apple Stores outsell national average by 17 times | Electronista

Apple leads all US retail chains per square foot


Marketing and technology analysis firm Asymco has extrapolated from retail data from US chains to reveal that Apple isn't just the top seller per square foot among US retailers, it outsells the average brick-and-mortar outlet 17 times over. The sales-per-square-foot annual measurement, long the leading metric of retail profitability, shows Apple with an average of $5,626 in sales per square foot, compared to an average of $330 for US mall stores.

Even taking the median average of the top 20 best retailers in the US shows Apple to be in a league of its own. While the top 20 retailers more than double the mall and roughly double the average for speciality apparel retailers, their median average of $787 per square foot is still one-seventh the average of Apple stores.

Moreover, the data used by Asymco analyst Horace Dediu shows that Apple's performance was nearly double of its nearest retail competitor, jewelry dealer Tiffany & Co. Among non-Apple retailers, jewellers tend to achieve the highest sales per square foot due to the average cost of their product. The raw data came from surveys done by RetailSails, which studied 160 top American retail chains.

Apple not only leads all other US retailers in sales, but also in growth. The company gained 70.5 percent in sales across the 327 stores Apple had open when the study was done last summer (it now has 365, with more opening later this year). Canadian fitness-wear chain Lululemon Athletica, the second-place finisher, managed about 45 percent in growth.

Most of the top 20 retailers consist of specialty apparel, warehouse retailers and jewelry firms, with only GameStop and Best Buy being considered technology or electronics retailers in the top 20. Best Buy actually achieved negative growth, shrinking 0.6 percent.

Apple is the only retailer of the top 20 to also have affiliate and "store within a store" sales, which may help explain the staggering level of sales and growth. The company has recently agreed to more SWAS concept showcases in Walmart stores, Target stores and even the famous Harrods of London department store.

Former retail VP Ron Johnson, who is now CEO of JC Penney's, is bringing the SWAS concept he pioneered to the retail chain -- which may selling Apple products. [ via Asymco]









Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Lahcim Leinad4/19/2012 7:32:03 AM
   of 154308
 

Nokia posts €590m net loss with smartphone sales halving | Electronista

Most of the sales slump has been attributed to the expected cooling of Symbian-powered device sales, although Nokia said that this had been ‘partially offset by growing sales of Nokia Lumia devices.’ However, it is likely that Nokia would have hoped to gain more traction from its Windows Phone 7 devices, while critically well-received, have not captured consumer interest which remains focused largely on Apple and Samsung smart devices.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Lahcim Leinad4/19/2012 7:36:30 AM
1 Recommendation   of 154308
 
BBC News - Qualcomm warns of smartphone Snapdragon chip shortage

Qualcomm said that the third-party factories to which it subcontracts the manufacture of the "28 nanometre" chips would not be able to create enough supply until the end of the year.

The news will impact Android and Windows-based phone makers who had planned to use the products.

"Looking forward, this will impact shipments of mass-market smartphones as firms re-engineer their devices, but having said that, I think the industry should not take too long to catch up," said Malik Saadi, principal analyst at Informa Telecoms.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Lahcim Leinad who wrote (131367)4/19/2012 7:38:43 AM
From: Moonray   of 154308
 
Qualcomm has banner Q2 results based on 3G, 4G phones | Electronista
But, QCOM is DOWN 2+ points in pre-market as they can't make chips fast enough for customers
and had to lower next quarter's guidance as they proceed to build more manufacturing plants.

o~~~ O

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.