SI
SI
discoversearch

   Technology StocksTwitter, Inc.


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Ron who wrote (1118)8/23/2017 3:48:13 AM
From: TexasRanger23
   of 1129
 
I hope not too many. If the verification code didn't work users could also contact support which is mentioned on their website. I'm sure if Twitter is bombarded with support requests they'll remedy the problem quickly. They can't risk cutting their user-base.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Ron8/25/2017 8:09:18 PM
2 Recommendations   of 1129
 
Twitter's definitely got a problem. Heard from more friends whose accounts were locked for no reason.
Some can get unlocked, some cannot. So... my account was locked an hour ago. Ridiculous. Fortunately, my account took the code and its working again. Wondering how many thousands or millions of people they are losing with this.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: FUBHO8/31/2017 10:51:56 AM
1 Recommendation   of 1129
 
Twitter Inc (NYSE: TWTR) is overvalued, and I’ve believed so for years. And while I’ve never shorted the shares, I still never cease to be amazed at the many permutations of the bull case for TWTR stock.


TWTR 16.93 0.00 0.00% : Twitter, Inc.


All of the Bull Cases for Twitter Inc (TWTR) Stock Are Simply Bull

There have been so many reasons for why “now is the time” to own Twitter stock. After its fall from 2015 levels around $50, TWTR was a turnaround play. CEO Jack Dorsey’s return was greeted with much optimism, but with investors somehow willing to ignore that he was also the CEO of Square Inc (NYSE: SQ). There was a focus on cost-cutting that would improve margins.

A $10 million deal with the NFL in 2016 was touted as a huge driver for what was then a $15 billion stock. (I woke up this morning to see the market cap is now “a bit” off from that, at $9.6 billion.(YAHOO FINANCE SHOWS $12.4 BILLION)

Then Twitter was going to sell itself to everyone from Walt Disney Co(NYSE: DIS) to Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ: GOOGL) to Salesforce.com, Inc.(NYSE: CRM). How’d that go?

Twitter rallied again. Q2 earnings tanked TWTR stock. And now the shares are rising again, trading near $17. The new driver appears to be video, even though that has little chance of changing Twitter’s long-term outlook.

Through all the bull cases, however, there has been one simple, consistent problem: Twitter is not profitable.


Excluding the huge amount of Twitter stock used to pay employees, it’s not even close. Twitter stock can’t maintain any upside until that changes. And I remain highly skeptical that it ever will.


The Numbers Behind Twitter StockBased on third quarter guidance, Twitter is on pace to generate about $700 million in Adjusted EBITDA this year. That figure excludes a projected $450 million in share-based compensation: TWTR stock given to the company’s employees. That figure isn’t a cash cost, but it’s real nonetheless, as each compensation share dilutes existing shareholders.

How significant is the dilution? Between 2014 and 2016, a Twitter shareholder saw the size of his stake in the company (on a percentage basis) shrink by about 15%. In that two year period, Twitter added 100 million shares — nearly all of them through share-based compensation.


Depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges but capital expenditures aren’t. They are guided to the $300 million-$400 million range for this year. And Twitter has about $25 million in cash interest expense related to its convertible bonds (it also books non-cash interest charges as well).

In other words, that $700 million figure, which sounds like a profit, actually implies negative free cash flow excluding the issuance of shares. Ignoring changes in working capital, and assuming $350 million in capex, Twitter will generate about $325 million in free cash flow this year. It will do so by issuing $450 million in stock.

That’s the core problem here. Twitter does report non-GAAP net income — but that, too, excludes dilution. And this isn’t a new problem. Twitter reported $444 million in “adjusted” free cash flow in 2016. Share-based compensation was $615 million.

Twitter, as a company, does not generate cash on its own merits. It only creates positive free cash flow through the heavy issuance of Twitter stock.

So the question, then, is how does that change?

Twitter Is Unprofitable

The answer might be that it doesn’t and it won’t. Twitter’s profits actually will marginally improve this year against 2016 — even with a likely decline in reported Adjusted EBITDA. That figure, with stock-based compensation added back, was $136 million last year. It seems likely to clear $200 million this year.

But that’s after a first half that was better than the second half appears to be. Q3 guidance suggests a modest improvement in earnings before dilution but not much (about $35 million vs. $25 million). It’s certainly not enough to get reported profits enough above dilution to cover interest expense and any necessary capital spending.


And what changes going forward? User growth has stalled out. Not even the free publicity and engagement driven by President Donald Trump’s use of the platform has helped on that front. Snap Inc (NYSE: SNAP) might be a disappointing stock, but as a platform, it is attracting younger users, some of whom likely could have helped Twitter grow.

Advertising rates are falling, and as a result revenue actually declined in each of the year’s first two quarters. The shift to video will accelerate that rate compression, and the need to pay for content will pressure margins.

Twitter at the moment is a toxic contribution. It’s functionally unprofitable. Revenue is declining. And margins are likely to compress. For all the other discussion, those core problems remain. Together, they create a stumbling block to the next bull case for Twitter stock.

TWTR Stock Is a Sell



Really, what’s left for Twitter to do?

Is it really going to become a major player in media by airing second-tier, Pac-12 sports and SportsCenter knockoffs? It’s clearly been for sale for years, and no one was interested. Going forward, there’s probably not a lot of demand for a no-growth, unprofitable business, particularly at a $10 billion valuation (plus cash on the balance sheet).

Twitter is a neat tool and an interesting platform. But it may be that there’s just no way in sight to monetize it to a point where it generates real, consistent profits. That doesn’t mean Twitter is going bankrupt soon.


But it does mean that valuing Twitter stock at $10 billion is something close to lunacy.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Glenn Petersen9/27/2017 11:42:58 AM
1 Recommendation   of 1129
 
140 Characters, the Defining Quirk of Twitter, Becomes a Relic of the Past

By Garett Sloane.
AdAge
Published on September 26, 2017.



Credit: Illustration by Tam Nguyen/Ad Age
__________________________________

Twitter's 140-character limit died today after a long battle with Facebook. It is survived by brands, publishers and personalities, who will miss its insistence on wit and getting to the point.

That's right: Twitter is expanding its character limit on text posts to 280 characters from 140, starting with a subset of users. The company is describing the move as a test, but the writing is on the wall for this succinct art form.

"Although we feel confident about our data and the positive impact this change will have, we want to try it out with a small group of people before we make a decision to launch to everyone," the company said in a blog post Tuesday. "What matters most is that this works for our community—we will be collecting data and gathering feedback along the way. We're hoping fewer Tweets run into the character limit, which should make it easier for everyone to Tweet."

Even though Twitter has been hinting at the change for more than a year, it is rolling out the longer limit slowly for fear of alienating its most hardcore users.

"140 characters isn't any easy construct, but that's exactly why I love it," says Jill Sherman, head of social strategy at DigitasLBi. "People and brands are forced to stop and think about what they really want to say. And it makes the feed pithy and easily scannable. I'll definitely miss it."

The constraint became a defining brand for Twitter, forcing its users to condense their thoughts into only the most essential words. Twitter users developed a text message-like shorthand that became its own language—"you are" became "u r"—and, more significantly, big ideas were often reduced to hashtags. And it made equals of everyone, in a way: From the greatest wordsmiths to the leader of the free world to the casual user, everybody shared the struggle of editing their thoughts down to their sharpest point.

Just look at President Trump's Twitter prose to see the power that even four can convey ("Sad!").

The original limit was enforced because that's how much room was left in an SMS text message after allowing 20 characters for a user name. To be sure, that had become a bit of a relic. What are character limits when posts are now crammed with videos, photos, GIFs, emojis and links?

In the end, the 140-character limit symbolized a problem for Twitter: It made it harder to get people to tweet, especially if they weren't used to it. For many, it could be the difference between becoming a new user and giving up immediately. After all, what can you possibly say in just 140 characters?

"I will admit to having something of an obsession with getting as much meaning into 140 characters as possible," says James McQuivey, a researcher at Forrester. "Someday I'll tell my grandkids how hard it was in my prime: 'We had to Tweet with just 140 characters, uphill, both ways!'"

The new limit gives more space to breathe, let thoughts expand, and possibly lower the difficulty level for anyone new to the service.

Some of the most active users say Twitter is walking away from part of what makes it so special.

"There's a sense of loss," says Noah Mallin, head of content at MEC. "The 140-limit really forced you into the clearest, most distilled expression. I'm sure the growth of people screen-shooting text helped to move this along, so I get that they saw a need. I think they want to still keep it from going to a longer character count than this. Otherwise it becomes Medium and we are blogging instead of micro-blogging."

People indeed often got around character limits by sharing images of longer texts, one of the behaviors that prompted CEO Jack Dorsey to start considering changes to the maximum.

Also, Twitter stopped including photos and other media elements toward the character limit.

Twitter is not extending the new limit of 280 character to Japan, China or Korea, because those languages do more with fewer characters, the company said in its blog post.

English, French, Portuguese and Spanish were included in the change.

"Trying to cram your thoughts into a Tweet," Aliza Rosen, Twitter product manager, and Ikuhiro Ihara, senior software engineer, said in the blog post. "We've all been there, and it's a pain."

Research shows the character limit is a "major source of frustration," according to the post, with 9 percent of tweets in English running up against it. In markets where the limit is less of a problem, more people tweet, the company says.

"We understand since many of you have been Tweeting for years, there may be an emotional attachment to 140 characters. we felt it, too," the post reads. "But we tried this, saw the power of what it will do, and fell in love with this new, still brief, constraint."

adage.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (1122)9/27/2017 11:49:49 AM
From: richardred
   of 1129
 
I wish I was one of the ones selected to try it. Many of my tweets have to be shortened to make the count.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: richardred who wrote (1123)9/27/2017 5:01:33 PM
From: Glenn Petersen
   of 1129
 
I have the same problem. Sometimes I would like to include a comment or a short quote from an article I am referencing.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: richardred who wrote (1123)9/30/2017 9:51:32 PM
From: Glenn Petersen
   of 1129
 
Personally, I think that an acquisition makes more sense, but who know?

Why Amazon should buy Twitter

It’s not a crazy idea.


by Kurt Wagner
Recode
Sep 30, 2017, 12:41pm EDT



Photo by David Ryder/Getty Images
Amazon should buy Twitter.
________________

One year ago, when Twitter was out looking for a new home, Amazon wasn’t really mentioned as a possible suitor. But many people — myself included — think Twitter will eventually have to sell. After years of little user growth and no profits, it’s clear the company needs a larger, more stable parent to protect it from the pressures of public company life.

Amazon could be that larger, more stable benefactor.

The current state of play: Twitter may be the most relevant it’s ever been, thanks in part to President Donald Trump, who uses the service daily to make pronouncements that end up destabilizing financial markets as well as world affairs. He’s stoked political tensions, bickered with other politicians, and created drama with other nations. ( Hi, North Korea!)

Trump aside, there are other reasons, though unproven, for why Twitter might look appealing to Amazon. It’s still the best platform for real-time search (which is why a lot of Google searches now show tweets), and while Twitter hasn’t perfected its search product, there is a lot of potential. Twitter hasn’t figured out social commerce yet either, but perhaps Amazon could make it work.

There are a lot of other reasons, which we get to below, but before that, let’s talk money. Amazon could easily make it work. Even at a very high 30 percent premium, Twitter’s takeout price would be around $16 billion. And while Amazon had $15.4 billion in cash at the end of June, it could offer stock plus cash. Or it could just borrow the funds outright as it did when it bought Whole Foods for just under $14 billion in June.

Why should Amazon buy Twitter? Here are five reasons:

Advertising

Amazon has a growing advertising business, and Twitter is an advertising company. Twitter hasn’t figured out direct response advertising the way Google and Facebook have, but matching Amazon’s purchase and search data with Twitter’s data around people’s interests is a fun idea. It could provide an immediate (though relatively small) boost if Amazon decided it wants to actually compete with Facebook and Google for marketing dollars, and Twitter’s real-time search data could prove valuable. Amazon is competing just fine on its own: eMarketer projects Amazon’s U.S. digital ad revenue will surpass Twitter’s this year, but adding Twitter would give Amazon much more data on mobile users.

Live Video

Twitter wants to be the best online destination for live video, a part of its push to distribute real-time news and information. The problem is that Twitter doesn’t have very good live video content. Many of its deals are for video that probably wouldn’t find a home anywhere else. Amazon, on the other hand, has some amazing content, including original TV shows and NFL football, but a smaller overall reach given it has about 85 million Prime members. Twitter, which had 328 million monthly active users as of June, could offer Amazon additional reach for its content, especially for mobile viewers, and offer a built-in social experience for some of Amazon’s best shows. Plus, putting some Amazon videos on Twitter might help draw people in who aren’t yet Amazon Prime subscribers.

Customer Service

Amazon is online shopping, but it doesn’t provide much in the way of connecting people to businesses the way that, say, Facebook is trying to do with Messenger and WhatsApp. Buying Twitter would immediately give Amazon another messaging option — and one that many people already use to try and get attention from brands and businesses. Imagine if Amazon could sell you a new television, then automatically connect you with the seller via Twitter DM for any troubleshooting, receipts or exchanges. Twitter already offers some business features for customer service purposes, but it’s really underachieved there. Teaming with Amazon could help.

Media impact

If anyone is willing to pay for a media company with social impact, it may be Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos. He already owns the The Washington Post, which he bought for $250 million back in 2013. (That was a personal purchase, not an Amazon purchase.) He may believe Twitter’s social and cultural value is worth preserving — plus, Bezos actually tweets. Potential bonus: The Post was not profitable when Bezos bought it, but turned a profit in 2016. Without the pressure that comes from a publicly traded stock, perhaps Bezos could do the same for Twitter.

Amazon can be patient

Some believe that, more than anything, Twitter would benefit from some air cover while it gets things figured out. Imagine if Twitter didn’t need to report earnings every three months, and the service was instead measured by its ability to influence the real world and disseminate information? Putting the company under Amazon’s umbrella would give Bezos time to figure out the best way to value Twitter without watching its business get ripped by the media and Wall Street every three months.

recode.net

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: hollyhunter10/2/2017 7:20:19 PM
   of 1129
 
Looks like good entry point here.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: FUBHO10/12/2017 7:14:49 PM
   of 1129
 
Tech Giants Transform From 'Saviors' to 'Threats'...

FACEBOOK Sandberg Slams TWITTER Over Censorship...

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: FUBHO who wrote (1127)10/13/2017 6:54:09 AM
From: scion
   of 1129
 
Twitter deleted data potentially crucial to Russia probes

Social-media platform’s strict privacy policy led to deletions of Russian information of interest to investigators.

By JOSH MEYER 10/13/2017 05:07 AM EDT
politico.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2017 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.