SI
SI
discoversearch

   Technology StocksTwitter, Inc.


Previous 10 Next 10 
From: Glenn Petersen5/6/2017 10:57:10 PM
1 Recommendation   of 1129
 

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: FUBHO5/7/2017 12:30:55 PM
   of 1129
 
ANTIFA SHOULD BURN DOWN TWITTER'S HQ. This company won't tolerate any tweets that aren't politically correct. Fascism like we have never seen in America.


Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: FUBHO who wrote (1093)5/8/2017 2:44:30 PM
From: The Ox
   of 1129
 
Too funny:

This company won't tolerate any tweets that aren't politically correct. Fascism like we have never seen in America
This coming from the person who banned me from the INFN board for posting a news article!


So, FUBHO, are you intolerant, petty, fascist or simply mean spirited? LOL

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Glenn Petersen5/8/2017 7:44:34 PM
2 Recommendations   of 1129
 
I will not allow this board to be politicized. I realize that Twitter exists in a political environment and that activity on its platform does influence both elections and legislative agendas. The company itself promotes its own political agenda in an effort to shape governmental policies that affect its business and economic prospects. It is an international company and occasionally adjusts its policies and practices in other countries to meet the political requirements of the country in which it is operating. Sometimes these “adjustments” may offend the sensibilities of those of us who are used to living in a free and open society. Unfortunately, it is a fact of life. Twitter is going to censor political posts that are overly aggressive and suspend accounts that were created for the specific purpose of disseminating information that is inaccurate. This is another fact of life. Twitter has the right operate as it wishes and to suspend the accounts of those individuals that have violated its Terms of Use. That is another fact of life. If Twitter’s practices and policies are unacceptable to its users, market forces will kick in and Twitter will lose both users and revenue. That is another fact of life.

As far as I am concerned, you are free to comment on and discus the above topics, as long as it is done in a civil and respectful manner. However, I would appreciate it if you could provide some context for your commentary.

Please avoid political posts that are short bursts of advocacy and unsupported by context. I want all of the participants (both active and lurking) to feel comfortable her and I am not going to let this board degenerate into a spitting match. There are other boards for those comments.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (1095)5/8/2017 8:34:59 PM
From: FUBHO
   of 1129
 
I had my second Twitter account closed late Saturday evening. I had two tabs open on #MacronLeaks and #MacronGate. They said my activity appeared automated. Basically, I was checking those two hashtags and would like or retweet things that looked cool or interesting.

I didn't even make a Tweet with original content. I was just liking and retweeting things. Probably liked 30 tweets and re-tweeted ten.

So twitter shut down an account, because it didn't like the what that account was liking and retweeting. No original content posted.

Can you believe that? It boggles my mind. This goes with the AP story on Facebook shutting down tens of thousands of accounts ahead of the UK general election.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: FUBHO who wrote (1096)5/8/2017 8:45:18 PM
From: The Ox
   of 1129
 
This can't be considered similar to the time you shut me down on the INFN thread without a chance to reply? No give and take, just a solid.....your banished? What? You don't think that's worthy of discussion? Banned. End of story......

So twitter shut down an account, because it didn't like the what that account was liking and retweeting. No original content posted.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: The Ox who wrote (1097)5/9/2017 12:24:19 PM
From: Sam
   of 1129
 
OT--
Pretty amusing. Robert (that is, FUBHO) banned me from his Robotics thread because I posted a story from the New York Times.

Banned ------ Banned on ------------------------------- Moderator's Reason for Ban ------------- Link to Offending Post All posts
Sam02/20/2017 09:59amPosting FAKE NEWSTexas Oil Fields Rebound From Price Lull63



siliconinvestor.com


Cute.

p.s. It was a very good article.
And he has me on ignore, but manages to comment on my posts anyway, lol....

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: more1005/11/2017 4:41:46 AM
   of 1129
 
Twitter is far superior to snap: 4x its revenue, 2x MAU, only 1/2 market cap, and $2.5bn in net cash. Will go into $20s and bought out!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: more100 who wrote (1099)5/11/2017 10:52:28 AM
From: The Ox
1 Recommendation   of 1129
 
SNAP, like a lot of IPOs, was a bit overpriced (IMO).

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Intelim5/13/2017 1:38:34 PM
   of 1129
 
While I don't approve of this kind of mindless bans on their side, all these platforms themselves created all these instruments to promote various agendas - globalist or nazist or others. Probably unintentionally but they need to find more appropriate ways to address this issue.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2017 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.