SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Strategies & Market Trends | BAK - Investing


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Covenant who wrote (1820)4/12/2012 12:06:03 PM
From: Covenant   of 3144
 
Re: One Buck Chuck inches down

The good news is bad storage news isn't getting worse.


5 Yr. Avg -144....Last year -138......This year -95.....January 6, 2012
5 Yr. Avg -162....Last year -243......This year -87.....January 13, 2012
5 Yr. Avg -156....Last year -174......This year -192.....January 20, 2012
5 Yr. Avg -192....Last year -189......This year -132.....January 27, 2012
5 Yr. Avg -197....Last year -209......This year -78.....February 3, 2012
5 Yr. Avg -165....Last year -233......This year -127.....February 10, 2012
5 Yr. Avg -150....Last year -81........This year -166.....February 17, 2012
5 Yr. Avg -117....Last year -85.........This year -82.....February 24, 2012
5 Yr. Avg -106....Last year -71.........This year -80.....March 8, 2012
5 Yr. Avg -60......Last year -56.........This year -64.....March 15, 2012
5 Yr. Avg -12......Last year -6...........This year +11.....March 22, 2012
5 Yr. Avg -7........Last year +12.........This year +57.....March 29, 2012
5 Yr. Avg +7........Last year -45.........This year +42.....March 29, 2012
5 Yr. Avg +29........Last year +28.........This year +8.....March 29, 2012

americanoilman.homestead.com 

Natural Gas (Henry Hub) Physical Future

Contract Overview
May 12 (NGK2)
Last2.039
Net Change+0.055
Prior Settle1.984
High2.069
Low1.976
Volume58498



datasuite.cmegroup.com 



Released: April 12, 2012 at 10:30 a.m. (eastern time) for the Week Ending April 6, 2012.
Next Release: April 19, 2012
Working Gas in Underground Storage, Lower 48
RegionStocks in billion cubic feet (Bcf)Historical Comparisons04/06/1203/30/12ChangeYear Ago (04/06/11)5-Year (2007-2011)AverageStocks (Bcf)% ChangeStocks (Bcf)% ChangeEastWestProducingTotal






ir.eia.gov 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Covenant who wrote (1850)4/12/2012 12:14:26 PM
From: Covenant   of 3144
 
Re: Bankers begin delivering coup de grace to NG drillers

This is just the warning shot. Next borrowing base adjustment will effect more companies and be more severe. Those who aren't far enough along in the switch from gas to oil will be faced with unattractive options: austerity or dilution, presumably at low prices.


Gas producers at risk of lending squeeze: analysts

Compton the first to face borrowing base drawdown this spring

BY REBECCA PENTY, CALGARY HERALD APRIL 10, 2012


CALGARY — The gassiest producers in the oilpatch could face banks turning down the taps on lending as institutions apply their own dismal natural gas pricing forecasts to borrowing bases, analysts said following the spring revision’s claim of its first victim, Compton Petroleum Corp.

Calgary-based Compton, an intermediate whose production is 83 per cent natural gas, must repay $30 million in outstanding debt resulting from a credit drawdown by May 7, the company announced Monday. Compton’s syndicate of lenders revised lower the firm’s maxed-out credit facility of $140 million to $110 million, which the company blamed largely on a lower gas price outlook from the banks.

As lenders assess annual third-party reserve reports from producers, they’re applying their own price outlook on natural gas in the ground. The risk is they assume reduced ability to generate cash flow from production, in turn scaling down the available debt backed by those assets.

Banks typically do reviews twice a year, in the spring and fall, and 2012 has ushered in the lowest gas prices in a decade. Alberta’s AECO hub spot price dipped below $2 per gigajoule in late February — less than half a high last June of $4.15 per gigajoule — and has stayed there since the beginning of March on a glut in North American gas supply.

“This discussion is probably going on all over town,” said research analyst Gordon Currie of Salman Partners Inc. “In my view, anybody that’s at 50 per cent gas-weighted or more is in some jeopardy here,” he said, speculating that producers at risk could include Progress Energy Resources Corp., ARC Resources Ltd., Bonavista Energy Corp. and NuVista Energy Ltd.

Even worse, Currie warned, reserves could be revised down from current levels as low gas prices mean some of the discovered resource is uneconomic to produce.

A retraction of available credit is a symptom of a “big issue” facing executives in Calgary office towers and investors, the precipitous decline in natural gas prices smacking energy-related equities, said Garey Aitken, chief investment officer at Bisset Investment Management.

“In all likelihood we’re going to see, with a lower price deck being used by bank engineers in many cases, a reduction of borrowing bases,” Aitken said.

Aitken noted Compton might be an “extreme case,” as another producer might be far from tapping out its borrowing base, even with a slash to the limit it can draw down.

The news from Compton follows a previous reduction in the firm’s credit facility announced in January — by $20 million, to $140 million. Skope Energy Inc., a junior gas-weighted producer, had its borrowing base cut for a second time in January.

Compton lowered its production outlook by eight per cent this week and cut the upper end of its capital spending for 2012 by $2 million, to a range of $14 million to $16 million. It also said it hired RBC Capital Markets as an external adviser last month to attempt to raise money through asset sales and/or equity financing.

The options could include a transaction for which Compton’s roughly $500 million in tax pools might offset taxes, said Susan Soprovich, director of investor relations, who stressed the company’s assets have not changed.


“This is not a Compton issue, this is a natural gas issue,” Soprovich said.

Compton underwent more than two years of recapitalization before its entire management team quit last December. In February, the company appointed as president and CEO Ted Bogle, the director who had stepped in following the resignation of predecessor Tim Granger.

Shares of Compton closed at a 52-week low of $2.41 Tuesday, down 23 cents, after losing 33 per cent of their value on Monday.

rpenty@calgaryherald.com

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: XoFruitCake who wrote (1838)4/12/2012 1:01:54 PM
From: thatsnotluck   of 3144
 
Re: AAPL Question for XO


<<And life after earning is anyone guess given the low guidance the company gave in Jan earning call ($8.5 vs $9.8 concensus of 45 analyst vs $12 fruitcake estimate) >>

so if they hit the XO $12 number, how much of a bump do you expect to stock price? and can they really be that far off in their estimate? sounds like the street is already assuming they sandbag by 15% give or take, and you think the numbers will be 20% higher than the analysts? do they regularly blow out guidance numbers?

toying with doing something here. not sure yet just what, other than it being a small test, whataver it is.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: Covenant4/12/2012 1:06:44 PM
   of 3144
 
Re: IRA Conversion Question

I just made my non-deductible IRA contribution today. When can I convert it to a ROTH? I would like to do this before I do any trades so that there are absolutely no tax effects.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: thatsnotluck who wrote (1842)4/12/2012 1:14:03 PM
From: Covenant1 Recommendation   of 3144
 
Re: Shell oil slick in GOM ... Shares down


"A thorough inspection to date of Shell assets reveals operations in the area are normal with no signs of leaks,"


Natural seep like Macondo.



Shell Says No Signs Of Leak in Its US Gulf Operations




by Dow Jones Newswires
Ben Lefebvre & Isabel Ordonez
Thursday, April 12, 2012

HOUSTON - Royal Dutch Shell PLC said that an oil sheen floating in the central U.S. Gulf of Mexico didn't stem from two nearby oil and gas platforms owned by the oil giant, and that the amount of oil in the sheen was small.

"A thorough inspection to date of Shell assets reveals operations in the area are normal with no signs of leaks," Shell spokeswoman Kelly op de Weegh said in an e-mailed statement Thursday. The comments seemed to ease investors' concerns that the Anglo-Dutch company was mired in a major environmental catastrophe; shares in London, which were down nearly 4% early Thursday at 2,100 pence, were back up to 2,175 pence after the Shell update. Shell shares in the U.S., which opened 1.5% below their Wednesday close, were up 0.5% at $68.07 in mid-morning trading.

On Wednesday, Shell spotted a five-square-mile oil sheen in the Gulf's Mississippi Canyon area, according to a filing with the National Response Center. The company said in a statement later that day that a 10-square mile layer of an unknown substance was floating between its Mars and Ursa platforms, which are some of the largest producing facilities in the U.S. Gulf. They are located about 130 miles southeast of New Orleans. In September 2005, Mars was heavily damaged by hurricane Katrina, but restarted service in mid-2006.

Shell said it confirmed that there are "no well control issues" associated with its drilling operations in the area. The company said it is still investigating the sheen, which is estimated to measure the equivalent of six barrels of oil, and will leave the oil-response vessel it dispatched Wednesday in the area. Shell has also deployed remote-operating vehicles to inspect local infrastructure, and also look for naturally occurring seeps.

The U.S. Coast Guard said that it is conducting a flight over the area and that it expects to release results of the observation before noon.

Nearly two years ago, a Transocean Ltd. rig working for BP PLC in the U.S. Gulf blew up after it lost control of the deepwater well it was drilling, killing 11 and unleashing the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history. The unprecedented incident resulted in an overhaul of offshore-drilling regulations and increased vigilance about oil spills in the region.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: Covenant4/12/2012 1:32:38 PM
   of 3144
 
Re: Dumped AA

Good company, bad industry. Nice earnings trade.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Covenant who wrote (1854)4/12/2012 1:36:44 PM
From: thatsnotluck   of 3144
 
Re: Shell oil slick in GOM ... Shares down


Great news. i may still wait a few days or weeks to get back in. just in case they are as forthright as the typical company in a bad situation. i have plenty of industry exposure. hard to see how this event would improve the company-specific story, and i do not see any price as having been paid as yet. but hopefully not another environmental disaster than will once again kill ATPG quickly if they have to shut down again.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

From: Covenant4/12/2012 1:53:10 PM
   of 3144
 
Re: Reddy Ice to buy bankrupt Arctic Glacier, file bankruptcy itself

Creditors are doing an industry rollup.

April 12, 2012, 8:50 am Reddy Ice to File for Bankruptcy By BEN PROTESS
Reddy Ice, the largest manufacturer and distributor of packaged ice in the United States, said on Thursday that it expected to file for bankruptcy as it confronted a huge debt load, stiffer competition and broader economic uncertainty.

The company, based in Dallas, also plans to acquire another embattled ice maker, Arctic Glacier, which filed for bankruptcy in February.

Centerbridge Partners, a hedge fund that is a major creditor of Reddy Ice, has “indicated its interest” in financing the acquisition, Reddy Ice said in a regulatory filing on Thursday.

Macquarie Bank, meanwhile, is expected to provide a $70 million debtor-in-possession revolving credit facility. The credit will address the company’s capital needs while in bankruptcy, and provide $50 million once Reddy Ice emerges from Chapter 11 proceedings.

In a statement, Reddy Ice said it would file for bankruptcy “promptly” in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas. It plans to seek approval from the court to emerge from bankruptcy in 45 days or less.

The company said it did not expect the bankruptcy process to disrupt its business operations.

”We expect to emerge from this restructuring as a much stronger company that is well positioned for investment in growth and enhanced profitability,” Gilbert M. Cassagne, the company’s chief executive officer and president, said in a statement.

Still, the company faces a challenging road to recovery. It lost nearly $70 million last year, on top of more than $40 million in losses in 2010.

The company suffered as its prices declined amid deeper industry competition, and racked up a mounting debt load. It currently has $516 million in liabilities. The company was delisted from the New York Stock Exchange in December after its stock price failed to meet the exchange’s listing requirements.

Reddy Ice said in recent months that it had formed an informal committee of creditors to renegotiate and restructure the company’s debt burden. A majority of lenders and major creditors support the restructuring plan, Reddy Ice said on Thursday.

The company’s legal advisor is DLA Piper, while its financial advisers are Jefferies & Company and FTI Consulting.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: thatsnotluck who wrote (1856)4/12/2012 1:57:43 PM
From: Covenant1 Recommendation   of 3144
 
Re: Shell oil slick in GOM ... Shares down

The estimate is 6 barrels have been spilled. That could come from anywhere. A leaking fitting on a pipe would be my guess if Shell's operations are the source. Given the location, I suspect it is from Shell and not a natural seep. There are a lot of pipes, connections, etc. to check. Neither checking nor repairing is cheap, but fixing something when it is small sure beats waiting for a bigger problem to develop.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: xxyy4/12/2012 2:02:05 PM
   of 3144
 
re: nondeductible IRA / W

W,

I haven't looked into this before (though I guess I should have). Is there any downside to the
nondeductible IRA/convert to Roth? Are there income restrictions? I guess if I want to do this, I should do it immediately so I can do both a 2011 and a 2012 contribution.

It seems sort of like a loophole - am I right?

Thanks
X

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.