Technology Stocks | Facebook, Inc.


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (263)5/1/2012 1:27:37 PM
From: R2O   of 1272
 
“You’ve got a permanent stockholder for 6 or 7 percent of your shares,” Buffett said at the time. “We like permanent shareholders. That’s exactly what we’re looking for.”

Why would anybody want to become a permanent shareholder of a company that will never pay a dividend? I can't even buy a McDonald's breakfast with Buffet's dividend. Might just as well throw it in a hole .. permanently..

R2O

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: FUBHO who wrote (270)5/1/2012 6:32:33 PM
From: Brian Sullivan3 Recommendations   of 1272
 
BREAKING: Facebook's IPO is set for May 18. The IPO roadshow will start on Monday. http://on.wsj.com/97vJbq

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (272)5/2/2012 11:12:18 AM
From: FUBHO1 Recommendation   of 1272
 
Instagram crosses the 50 million mark

By Om Malik May. 2, 2012, 7:24am PT No Comments


gigaom.com 


When Instagram launched its Android app in early April, we said that it would only be a couple of weeks before the company crossed the 50 million mark. Well, it took three weeks (interrupted by its $1 billion dollar acquisition by Facebook) to cross that milestone. In early April 2012, Instagram had about 30 million members.

The speed of Instagram’s growth was what panicked Mark Zuckerberg. Despite pretensions, Facebook is primarily a photo sharing site and photos happen to be one of the key sources of engagement on its vast platform. While their “photo” franchise might not be a money maker for the company, it keeps bringing people back.

The growth of Instagram photos being shared on both Facebook and Twitter was one of the reasons Zuckerberg paid a billion dollars for the 13-person operation without as much as consulting his board.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Glenn Petersen5/2/2012 5:16:23 PM
   of 1272
 
The Big Doubt Over Facebook

By SUZANNE VRANICA And SHAYNDI RAICE
Wall Street Journal
Updated May 1, 2012, 10:16 p.m. ET

Facebook Inc. has built a $3 billion-a-year advertising business by convincing marketers to buy new forms of advertising designed to create buzz around their brands.

But some advertisers with big spending accounts are wondering whether they're getting their money's worth.

The doubt lingers as bankers and prospective investors decide how to value Facebook for an initial public offering planned for May 18, said people familiar with the matter. Facebook executives will be pitching the company to big investors in an IPO roadshow starting Monday, these people said.

"The question with Facebook and many of the social media sites is, 'What are we getting for our dollars?'" said Michael Sprague, vice president of marketing at Kia Motors Corp.'s North American division.

The automaker has advertised on Facebook since 2009 and plans to increase its ad spending on the site. While building brand awareness on a site with 900 million users is valuable, Mr. Sprague said he's unclear if "a consumer sees my ad, and does that ultimately lead to a new vehicle sale?"

The concerns from Kia and other advertisers underscore the difficulties of measuring results of nascent-forms of social-media advertising.

Google Inc. GOOG +0.47%and Yahoo Inc. YHOO +0.26%sell traditional display and search ads on their sites. Facebook also offers image and text-based ads, but it pushes new methods that haven't been fully tested.

For example, last year Facebook launched a "Sponsored Stories" feature that lets advertisers rebroadcast people's positive posts on the site's main news feed to highlight them. Advertisers pay a rate based on impressions, or views those posts get.

While advertisers can directly track the return from ads on Google and Yahoo, Facebook mostly doesn't permit third-party surveys on its site or allow ads to be tagged with "cookies," software that tracks what people do online after seeing an ad.

Last week, Facebook showed its advertising growth doesn't always go up. The company reported its first-quarter ad revenue rose 37% to $872 million from a year ago, but it was down 7.5% from the previous three months. Facebook blamed "seasonal trends" for the decline, as well as shifting user growth where the company generates less revenue per user.



The questions about Facebook's ad business also creates a dilemma for bankers and investors who must decide whether Facebook deserves a lofty valuation. People familiar with the matter have said Facebook will seek a $100 billion valuation.

At that figure, Facebook's valuation would also be about 33 times its advertising revenue, compared with 5.5 times for Google. The reason for the discrepancy is in large part due to the fact that Facebook is still a young company with faster growth than Google, which is worth $200 billion but had $36.5 billion in ad revenue last year.

Jed Williams, an analyst at BIA Kelsey, said that in order to justify that valuation, Facebook's revenue would have to grow 41% annually for the next five years. That's a much steeper climb than Google's recent revenue growth of 24% in 2010 and 29% in 2011.

Still, Mr. Williams said much of Facebook's valuation isn't around the hard numbers of its ad business as it currently stands, but said it's a "more general bet."

"When you have an audience that sticky and big you'll figure it out," he said. "If you're Facebook, you have to figure it out in a hurry."

Advertisers, meanwhile, are trying gauge their own performance on Facebook. In March, Martin Sorrell, chief executive officer of WPP, WPPGY -0.17%the world's largest ad company, told attendees at a conference that "clients, for the very first time, are starting to question the measurement issue" on social media.

"The area is a very sexy area, and clients have gone in almost willy-nilly, because it's fashionable to do so," Mr. Sorrell added. But now that such ad spending has ramped up, he said finance departments "are increasingly starting to look at the value of those investments."

WPP, which works on behalf of companies such as Unilever UN +0.79%PLC and Procter & Gamble Co., PG +0.64%said it expects to double its ad spending on Facebook this year to about $400 million. WPP said it will spend "north" of $2 billion with Google this year, up from about $1.6 billion last year.

It doesn't help that Facebook has alienated some advertisers with what they perceive as a highhanded attitude that implies that marketers have nowhere else to turn. Some media buyers and advertisers said Facebook has stymied their attempts to get more ad measurement, for instance.

"There's a pretty high degree of animosity right now with Facebook because they have become so powerful," said Rob Griffin, global director of product development at Havas Digital, a unit of Havas HAV.FR +1.29%SA. The tension, he added, is partly the result of how quickly Facebook has had to scale its business.

For its part, Facebook has made repeated attempts to quell marketers' concerns about the effectiveness of its ads. Last year, the company began working with research firms comScore Inc. and Nielsen Co. to offer tools that let big brands track their social media campaigns on the site.

Nielsen, for example, measures consumers who saw an ad on Facebook and compares them with a similar control group of Facebook users who didn't see the ad. It then matches that up against shopper data to see how ad exposure affected sales of the product.

Still, the research firm says not all types of ads are easy to measure all the way to purchase. They add it's particularly tough to get that level of detail from car ads, luxury goods and high-end clothing because such purchases aren't made regularly and often different emotional things play into those purchase decisions.

Some big advertisers have conducted research that shows social networking campaigns have boosted their sales. Ford Motor Co. F -1.16%said by using Facebook ads instead of Super Bowl ads in marketing its 2011 Explorer, shopping activity for the Explorer jumped 104% versus the average shopping lift of 14% following a Super Bowl ad.

A Ford spokesmanCharles Zinkowski said more than 20% of the company's digital media spend is on Facebook, but declined to be specific. "The number one trusted source of information for consumers is recommendations from friends and family," he said. "Facebook provides a reliable platform to leverage that insight at scale." Still, he said it's difficult to measure Facebook's value against other forms of advertising.

On Tuesday, research firm eMarketer released a study showing 84% of executives it recently polled said that social media campaigns had boosted the effectiveness of sales and marketing efforts. Yet eMarketer also said that "while measuring followers and Facebook 'likes' provides marketers with a hard number, no one yet knows how those numbers translate into a quantifiable return for brands."

Some ad executives caution that a calculation of monetary returns is an incorrect way of viewing Facebook ads.

"If a marketer measures [return on investment] as direct sales from the Web, then Facebook may not be the ideal platform," said Sarah Hofstetter, president of digital ad agency 360i, a unit of Dentsu Inc. 4324.TO 0.00%"But if the goal is to move the needle on brand health metrics, whether its awareness or engagement,... then Facebook should be a key part of the marketing mix for most consumer brands."

Some brands have figured out ways around Facebook's measurement limitations. They have hired ad companies like Buddy Media Inc., which can give advertisers a deeper understanding of how Facebook's promotions work, or install apps that offer advertisers the ability to track users by allowing people to opt in to cookies.

Kia, meanwhile, said it is working with Facebook to get better measurement of the effectiveness of its ads. Kia declined to provide ad spending figures.

For now, "being on Facebook sends a message," said Mr. Sprague. "Consumers they say 'Facebook is working with Kia, I like Facebook ergo I like Kia.' That's what we are hoping for."

—Martin Peers contributed to this article. A version of this article appeared May 2, 2012, on page B1 in some U.S. editions of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: The Big Doubt Over Facebook.

online.wsj.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (276)5/3/2012 2:32:09 PM
From: FUBHO   of 1272
 
Samsung is introducing their next superphone today, Galaxy S III. The first part of the presentation is about Facebook integration or ease of use.

Damn, I am just an old fart. I still don't like facebook...

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: FUBHO who wrote (277)5/3/2012 3:03:19 PM
From: Glenn Petersen   of 1272
 
It is being reported that Facebook is going to file an amendment to its S-1 this afternoon that will include its initial thoughts on pricing:

Facebook IPO to Seek $85 Billion to $95 Billion Value

By SHAYNDI RAICE, ANUPREETA DAS and JOHN LETZING
Wall Street Journal
Updated May 3, 2012, 2:42 p.m. ET

Facebook Inc. is planning to set the price range for its impending initial public offering in the high-$20s to mid-$30s a share, valuing itself at roughly $85 billion to $95 billion, said people familiar with the matter.

The pricing puts the social network on track to become the most valuable U.S. Web company at the time of an IPO, exceeding Google Inc.'s GOOG +0.60%$23 billion valuation in 2004. It would also put Facebook just behind the market capitalization of Amazon.com Inc. AMZN -0.69%and ahead of other technology giants like Hewlett-Packard Co. HPQ -2.93%

Facebook plans to unveil its pricing range in a new regulatory filing after the market close, said people familiar with the matter. People familiar with the matter had said Facebook expected to go public at a valuation of up to $100 billion.

The company is planning to start its roadshow to pitch its stock to investors on Monday, said people familiar with the matter. If the roadshow goes smoothly, Facebook will hold its IPO on May 18 on the Nasddaq Stock Market, setting final pricing for the deal the day before, said these people.

Companies regularly tweak their pricing information after they've issued a first pricing range. That means Facebook's share price could climb higher in the coming days, depending on demand seen by the firm's investment bankers as they showcase the deal to institutional investors on a roadshow. The offering is being led by Morgan Stanley, MS -4.28% J.P. Morgan JPM -0.81%and Goldman Sachs GS -2.16%.

Facebook's IPO is a watershed moment for Silicon Valley, which is riding a wave of a new generation of Internet IPOs. But even amid the boom, which has spawned the likes of daily-deals site Groupon Inc. GRPN -2.46%and social-gaming company Zynga Inc., ZNGA -3.07%Facebook stands out. The social network has garnered an audience of more than 900 million users since it was founded in 2004, and has been the subject of an Oscar-winning film "The Social Network."

Much like the IPO of Internet browser company Netscape in the mid 1990s, which went on to produce a coterie of other Web businesses, Facebook has also generated new start-ups built on top of its platform. Those range from Zynga to up-and-coming sites like online bulletin board Pinterest.

Facebook's reach is also unprecedented. The company, founded by Mark Zuckerberg and some Harvard University friends, is now fast approaching an audience of one billion, and it continues to draw users from numerous demographics and international markets. It's now expected to broach the sensitive—but massive—Chinese Internet market.

Still, some recent financial disclosures by the company put a damper on enthusiasm about its impending IPO. Unlike many other Web companies that recently went public, Facebook is profitable. But the company recently disclosed that its profit and sales dipped in the first quarter of this year, compared to the prior period.

Sales in the period fell 6% from the fourth quarter to $1.06 billion, while profit slumped 32% to $205 million.

In 2011, Facebook posted a profit of $1 billion and $3.7 billion in sales, compared to a loss of $56,000 and $272 million in sales as recently as 2008.

Facebook has also been on something of a spending spree of late, shelling out $1 billion in a cash and stock deal for photo-sharing service Instagram and agreeing to pay $550 million for a trove of patents sold by Microsoft Corp. MSFT -0.38%

Scott Sweet, senior managing partner at IPO Boutique, said the pull of Facebook's IPO became clear when his elderly parents started asking him about it on behalf of neighbors at their Florida retirement community.

"Their friends in the community they live in weren't familiar with IPOs, and don't have a Facebook account, but are very much interested in purchasing Facebook," he said. "I've used the word pandemonium for this offering since it was filed."

With such demand in the offing, few investors think Facebook's IPO arc will follow that of Google's in 2004. University of Florida Professor Jay Ritter noted that Google initially priced its stock at its IPO at between $108 and $135 a share. That was later revised down to $85 to $95 and ultimately priced at $85. Google shares now trade for more than $600.

Write to John Letzing at john.letzing@dowjones.com

online.wsj.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Glenn Petersen5/3/2012 4:10:21 PM
   of 1272
 
The new amendment:

sec.gov 

337,415,352 shares (180,000,000 by the company) at a range of $28.00 to $35.00 per share. Zuckerberg is selling 71,088,562 shares.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (279)5/3/2012 4:24:21 PM
From: zax   of 1272
 
California gonna love him. Whats the tax on 2.5 billion dollars?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: zax who wrote (280)5/3/2012 5:03:57 PM
From: Glenn Petersen   of 1272
 
In California, personal income over $46,766 (for a single taxpayer) gets taxed at a 10.3% rate.

tax-brackets.org 

It is my understanding that capital gains are taxed at the same rate.

Zuckerberg's tax liability arises from the exercise of his options:

Message 28050346

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (281)5/3/2012 5:22:00 PM
From: zax   of 1272
 
So $250 million in state taxes alone. Wow.

And thats just the cut from Zuck.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.