Gold/Mining/Energy | U.S. Silver Corp


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: The Barracuda™ who wrote (59)1/27/2012 10:59:22 AM
From: DrBill   of 112
 
USA.TO OPENS TSX TODAY



Here's the video

http://www.firstpost.com/topic/place/toronto-us-silver-corporation-usatsx-opens-toronto-stock-exchange-january-27-2012-video-9WcovMmZ0CE-73-1.html

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: DrBill who wrote (56)1/27/2012 1:47:34 PM
From: sense   of 112
 
That's interesting...

Don't know if I've ever seen another company that was uplisting... with an interim CEO replacing one retiring basically on the day the uplisting happens ?

Was Tom's plan one that had him signed up to get them there... and then... ?

Or, is there some other undercurrent to be aware of in the politics of this ?

Just time ? Or, being shown the exit... with a need for some new faces given the new venue and larger stage ?

While I think it necessary to ask the questions, I'd be remiss not to be pointed in my appreciation of Tom Parker.

I don't think USSIF would be here now without his steady hand on the tiller, keeping USSIF solidly on course and heading the right direction, when others were trying to divert it off in other directions.

I have particularly appreciated his no nonsense approach to things, and often brutally honest and straightforward answers to questions asked the same way... all done minus the sugar coating... wasting no one's time while getting through the meat and right down to the bone. Tip o the hat to Mr. Parker.





Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: sense who wrote (62)1/27/2012 4:29:12 PM
From: DrBill   of 112
 
Sense:
Tom Parker did a fabulous job keeping USA alive during the bad times. Many other mines closed but somehow he kept all going even when margins were razor thin. Now the margins are better and the company is moving to a new plateau. Maybe Tom just wants some time for himself & his family. He still has his stock options & a big chunk of shares.

Big players are now expecting big things of management. It's not just running an operating mine. It's building a growing company, opening new mines, more roadshows, hosting institutions, preparing for the coming consolidation in the Silver Valley. Maybe he wants to turn the reins over to someone else who enjoys that type of activity. Maybe he is tired of corporate life. I don't know.

But, I wish Tom Parker well & thank him for his survival skills in keeping USSIF alive.
Regards,
DrBill

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: DrBill who wrote (63)1/28/2012 8:00:45 AM
From: DrBill   of 112
 
NEW SYMBOL: USSID FOR U. S. SILVER CORP.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: DrBill who wrote (64)1/30/2012 3:57:24 PM
From: DrBill   of 112
 
NICE FIRST DAY CHART: AFTER THE R/S
________________________________________________

ih.advfn.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: DrBill who wrote (65)1/30/2012 8:29:05 PM
From: DrBill   of 112
 
Egon von Greyerz:

“The move in gold, so far, looks extremely good. I’m always pleased that we don’t have a straight move up, although I do think we will have faster moves higher in the not too distant future. This is strong action with small corrections.

We are at $1,730 today and I think within the next couple of months we will certainly be touching $1,900 and continuing higher from there. I don’t think $1,900 will be a stopping point for very long.

I really like the action of silver. Silver still hasn’t broken out like gold has, but as I said to you last time, I expect that to happen soon. It will break out around the $37 level. That’s going to happen very quickly because the gold/silver ratio is moving down nicely, but I think it will soon accelerate lower and silver will move a lot faster to the upside than gold.

So I can see $37 being taken out within the next 30 days and then we will just start flying from there. It won’t take long to get up to $50 again.”


kingworldnews.com 

From The Slow Lane on SiliconInvestor

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: DrBill who wrote (66)1/31/2012 5:12:55 PM
From: sense   of 112
 
It is interesting to note the divergence in performance between gold and silver... or, GLD and SLV... with silver again under-performing gold by a pretty good margin.

That might easily enough be explained by the silver relationship to the real economy as silver is an important industrial mineral, with slack industrial demand undercutting the market prices, for now, while gold has almost exclusively a monetary role as a store of value, and doesn't have many "real" connections between supply and economic performance the way that silver does.

Gold (as GLD) does appear to be making a more convincing move than silver... and it clearly HAS broken well above the descending triangle it had on the weekly charts... while silver (as SLV or PSLV) just has not.

But, unless someone has a rational explanation for why the price differential should widen... ???

One of the charts has to be "wrong"... in some degree... leaving a need to explain how and why... which perhaps I've already done ?

It seems "inflation expectations" reflected in gold prices... are perhaps conflicting with "deflation happening" in the real economy... as that is reflected in declining industrial demand for silver ?

Seems that almost perfectly defines the nature of the issues the Fed is grappling with now... since it appears they either don't have the tools to "fix it"... or, at least, remain unwilling to use the ones they have... and have opted instead to shift gears from managing monetary policy to manipulating market expectations.

Perhaps the mantra "don't fight the Fed" needs to be adjusted for, a bit, with an eye solidly on the element of evaluating "what they say" in the context of what they say apparently including an issue where they're also saying "do as I say, and not as I do" ?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: sense who wrote (67)1/31/2012 9:23:29 PM
From: DrBill   of 112
 
Sense, might the SLV be subject to more manipulation being it is relatively so small ?


youtube.com 


SLV manipulation discussed starting at about 1:30 min.
Regards,
DrBill

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: DrBill who wrote (68)2/1/2012 12:26:09 PM
From: sense   of 112
 
I think SLV is definitely manipulated... that it is a key locus in the liquidity in the paper trade, around which the entire silver market is manipulated, but, I don't know about "small" relative to the volume that exists in "paper" silver ? It depends on your perspective, I guess, given the entire silver market is itself miniscule relative to other markets. I think SLV exists and was created mostly to create and enable the expansion of the trade in "paper" silver... and I think SLV holders are the intended victims and future inevitable bagholders in any silver market failure that does occur... and that SLV does knowingly facilitate that trade. It's creation and growth mirror exactly the "wedge" in the market that is the introduction of expansion in "paper". Worth studying that carefully, I think... noting particularly that if there IS a large failure in the paper trade at some point... it will be "silver investors" who bought SLV and not the banks creating and trading paper silver who are likely to be most hurt by it ?

I think serious silver market participants looking for a ETF vehicle will be buyers of Sprott's PSLV as an alternative... not just because PSLV is convertible to physical, but, also because PSLV is by design not working at undermining the trade their customers want to participate in by enabling others in the creation of large volumes of phony assets.

It bears watching... but, chart a two month daily layering SLV and PSLV and it appears that PSLV has a more exuberant base of followers... at least it did from Dec 20 to Jan 12... and that might create arbitrage opportunities for traders to take advantage of the differences in volatility at market inflection points... Or, it might be equally as useful if it functions as a "canary in the coal mine" for SLV holders... One cycle isn't much to go on. But, I think it will likely prove true over time that there is a significant difference in the level of market awareness between holders in SLV and PSLV... with SLV holders being passive silver "sheep"... and PSLV holders being aggressive silver "bulls".

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: DrBill who wrote (61)2/3/2012 1:41:08 PM
From: DrBill   of 112
 

USSID ON LIST OF TOP MINER ACQUISITION TARGETS
_____________________________________________________

from Globe & Mail Posted Feb. 2, 2012


Number Cruncher

Mining for attractive acquisition targets

ian mcgugan

From Friday's Globe and Mail

Pay dirt for global miners.

As the commodities trader Glencore heads toward a merger with the miner Xstrata, some observers theorize that the expensive and dangerous job of digging up ore will increasingly fall on the shoulders of a handful of major players with the financial muscle and engineering expertise to take on the challenges involved. According to this vision, behemoths such as Glencore-Xstrata, BHP Billiton (BHP-N), Vale (VALE-N), Rio Tinto (RIO-N)and China Shenhua Energy will inevitably gobble up smaller mining firms as they strive to achieve economies of scale.

More related to this story
•A marathon test for value stocks
•Looking for best-in-class U.S. stocks
•Hunger for yield fuels REIT funds’ rise


Mandalay Resources Corp (MND-T)
0.70 0.02 2.94%

As of Feb 2, 2012 3:37

.

.

.

Range: 1 Day
5 Day
1 Year

View Larger Chart
Add to Watchlist .

Video

Glencore and Xstrata's $80-billion merger talks


Video

Argentines protest Canadian mining project

It’s an intriguing theory, so we decided to see what firms might make the most attractive acquisition targets. Since acquisitions are usually done at a hefty premium to current share prices, owning shares in these firms could prove rewarding if takeover bids emerge.

How we did it

We looked for firms in the mining sector that met the following criteria:

-they trade in Toronto, New York or London;

-they change hands for less than 10 times earnings;

-they have enterprise values that are less than seven times EBITDA (Enterprise value is the total market value of a company’s shares and its net debt. EBITDA is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization);

-they have market capitalizations between $100-million (U.S.) and $15-billion. (In other words, big enough to move the dial for a larger company.)

-they have net debt that is less than their shareholders’ equity.

All these criteria are intended to spotlight firms that could be acquired at reasonable prices, with enough cash flow to support the debt that may be required to fund their acquisitions.

What we found

A dozen firms met our rough-and-ready criteria. Five of them were Canadian.

Readers should note that this screen is intended only as a first pass at identifying possible takeover targets. It doesn’t take into account the ore reserves of these companies, their exploration prospects or any of the other factors that can make a miner worth more or less than the accounting figures might suggest.

Investors should do their own research before buying. But each of these miners does possess the fundamental financial characteristics that might attract a potential acquirer.




Miners that could get scooped up



Company

Symbol

P/E

EV/EBITDA
T12M

Net debt/
equity

Market
cap ($ mil.)



Gem Diamonds Ltd.

GEMD

9.7

2.2

-32.2

470.9



Mandalay Resources

MND-T

9.7

6.3

3.4

175.7



Cloud Peak Energy

CLD-N

9.5

5.2

63.6

1,196.10



Pan American Silver

PAA-T

8.6

4.6

-30.7

2,513.70



New World Resources

NWR

8.2

3.8

47.7

2,064.10



Kazakhmys PLC

KAZ

7.9

5

0.4

10,077.90



High River Gold

HRG-T

7.6

3.5

-16.1

1,042.50



U.S. Silver Corp.

USA-T

7.1

3.2

-32.2

152.2



Gemfields PLC

GEM

6.8

4.8

-31.7

117.3



Thompson Creek Metals

TCM-T

6.2

5.2

0.2

1,499.10



Eurasian Natural

ENRC

5.8

3.9

-4.7

14,347.90



Highland Gold Mining

HGM

5.2

4

-35

877.6

_____________________________________________________________

SORRY THE TABLE ABOVE DIDN'T TRANSFER SO WELL AND CHARTS DIDN'T TRANSFER AT ALL BUT USSID IS #8 FROM THE TOP.

LINK TO GLOBE & MAIL ARTICLE HERE;

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/investment-ideas/number-cruncher/mining-for-attractive-acquisition-targets/article2324882/


REGARDS,
DRBILL

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.