Gold/Mining/Energy | Wolverine Exploration


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Snafu_Sadie who wrote (26)1/8/2012 9:40:40 PM
From: older than dirt   of 173
 
May need patience, may not (depending on how much gain will satisfy your patience)
Should have announcement soon, may be big

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: older than dirt1/9/2012 1:48:12 PM
   of 173
 
Wolverine Exploration Announces Results of 2011 Exploration at Cache River Date : 01/09/2012 @ 1:34PM Source : MarketWire Stock : Wolverine Exploration Inc. (WOLV)

Wolverine Exploration Inc. ("Wolverine") (OTCQB: WOLV) (PINKSHEETS: WOLV) is pleased to provide an update on exploration activities on its mineral property in central Labrador. As reported in our last release, four of the eleven anomalous areas detected from the IP survey had been completed when winter weather conditions forced the shutdown of operations. The logic behind the sequence of drilling targets on grid 1 was to complete the holes located remote from immediate highway access as the season was far advanced when the program began. Wolverine had intended to complete the entire list of targets on both grids and this mode of operations was adopted. The drill camp was near grid 1 and to move on grid 2 would entail the moving of camp 20 km which would consume several days and it was felt that the delay would be unwarranted. As a result, the five locations on grid 2 where the malachite surface showings assayed up to 6.3% Cu could not be accessed due to inclement weather conditions.

Drill Hole CR1-08-11, where 37 meters of core had been cut and sent for assay, revealed low base metal values with traces of gold. Although the results were not as high as anticipated, Wolverine intends to complete the remainder of the program in 2012 and will begin drilling on the five locations situated on grid 2.

Two samples from drill hole CR1-07-11 that were sent to ActLabs for analysis of rare earth elements (REEs) returned values that were not considered significant enough for further action at this time.

On behalf of the Board

Lee Costerd

President

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disappointing

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: older than dirt who wrote (28)1/9/2012 1:58:10 PM
From: jfburk   of 173
 
The only positive here is this

As a result, the five locations on grid 2 where the malachite surface showings assayed up to 6.3% Cu could not be accessed due to inclement weather conditions.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: older than dirt who wrote (28)1/9/2012 2:08:35 PM
From: alpamare   of 173
 
Another "perfectly written" PR - unbelievable, no wonder people are selling off. They obviously have no clue in wording a NR.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: older than dirt who wrote (27)1/9/2012 2:12:55 PM
From: Snafu_Sadie   of 173
 
I guess a whole lot of patience will be needed. That PR was about as bad as things could get. So much for 'big' news....well, actually, it was pretty big....a big flop.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Snafu_Sadie who wrote (31)1/9/2012 2:45:23 PM
From: older than dirt   of 173
 
Certainly true
I expected much better
Consider this as eating crow (without salt)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: alpamare who wrote (30)1/9/2012 2:49:01 PM
From: older than dirt   of 173
 
Disappointing but I fail to see where "writing" could have improved it.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: older than dirt who wrote (33)1/9/2012 3:06:12 PM
From: alpamare   of 173
 
e.g. why would anyone be "pleased to provide an update" with these results ... or "the results weren't as high as anticipated..." what % did they anticipate ? Maybe their expectations were to high ... maybe the results weren't as bad as it seems !? Why would they continue the program if there is nothing of worth to continue .. hmmm

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: alpamare who wrote (34)1/9/2012 3:10:39 PM
From: Snafu_Sadie   of 173
 
Because if they declared that the exploration program was over then the stock would drop to 0. Instead, they will try to fluff and puff and drag this out for a few more years while they draw salaries. In the meantime, since WOLV management and insiders likely got their shares for nothing, they will be able to dump them on an unsuspecting market (albeit for far lower than they could have gotten last week).

There are thousands...tens of thousands....of mining juniors out there doing the exact same thing....staying alive by dragging out the inevitable with lots of hype.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: alpamare who wrote (34)1/9/2012 3:34:43 PM
From: older than dirt   of 173
 
"pleased to provide an update" with these results ...

This is standard boilerplate

I think that the Cu was below 0.2%,current lower economic limit for recovery

I am as disappointed as anybody, just can't see hammering it into the ground

There is considerable ground yet to explore, I believe the grab samples reflect something below ground as does the IP survey

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.