| To: PCskibum who wrote (592) | 3/2/2012 4:50:39 PM | | From: sense | 2 Recommendations of 3558 | | | Progress is occurring.
But, it is not only that progress is occurring... both in the Shining Tree project, and in moving Nemegosenda forward... ?
Even ignoring their continual (and despicable) effort in character assassination re the CEO, and the borderline fraud occurring in the continual effort made in misrepresenting the facts re market function and capital formation in mining development ?
Their entire storyline is SO FAR out of whack with the obvious in the practical reality apparent in both of those... and then, the market reality in relation to the facts re SRSR's projects... ???
SRSR trading now for the "market low" value... of the Shining Tree project, only ?
LOL!!!
The additions in the lease portfolio at Shining Tree... still not being valued, even in that equation ? Even a rising tide in the PM's now... will mean Shining Tree alone will soon be worth more than SRSR trades for now... based on nothing other than the market for the PM's rising, again... and the market for junior mining explorers stocks following.
To say nothing either of what the "new" Shining Tree leases are about, or what the values hidden in the Shining Tree leases "might" be ? Not only is there upside in relation to the PM markets changing direction, how much more in what might be found with a bit of effort in exploration at Shining Tree ? But, thus far... pretty much all we know about is what the potential of the Gosslin intersection might be... and even that is being understated.
I think the new leases to the southwest are... important... and still have no clue what the new lease package to east of the original Shining Tree leases is about... Find it curious, even, that it seems none of the SRSR DD monsters have poked at that hard enough to figure it out... given it seems we know "where" those leases are, at least ?
The flagrant lying you see occurring... about "whether" SRSR can fund any exploration work at Shining Tree... and about "how" finance in mining exploration works, in general... is an set of arguments that they CANNOT win, only because it is based in flaming fictional BS...
And then, when you see SRSR actually DOING what junior explorers do... funding exploration through JV activity, and turning a profit doing it... and see that success... that proves the critics wrong... is dismissed as irrelvant ?
LOL!!! They're losing the argument... because facts in accomplishments and proof in performance trump BS...
I note that SRSR has made continual progress in additions to the Shining Tree package over the last year... and, I don't see any reason to expect that the management effort we've seen delivering steady progress over the last year... is going to change in 2012...
I think there WILL be changes occurring in 2012... and agree with others I've been chatting with recently that the change that does occur in the markets this year is likely to prove surprising... and, more to some than others.
Of course, they've made similar progress at Nemegosenda as Shining Tree, including firming up lease holdings, and, even though it has been roundly ignored by the market... expanding the lease holdings to include much of the periphery of the "doughnut" that the original claims didn't include...
Dissing the management for not taking the first low ball offer shoved in front of them... when there are more than a few others it may be more useful to consider ? I'm glad we have Scott negotiating for us... and not those bozos...
It clearly is the case that SRSR has focused on niobium values to the point of understating the issues in REE values... and, they may have understated other mineral values in the Chapleau area holdings as well... but, I appreciate and value their focus, and their low key approach to the effort, as they focus on getting the work done, while ignoring the noise in the marketplace, that intends to disrupt their effort...
|
| | Sarissa Resources, Inc. (SRSR) | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1) |
|
