Orbite Aluminae | Stock Discussion Forums

From: clubhouse19	4/24/2012 2:31:37 PM
	2 Recommendations of 5241

from Jacob report By Moreno quite an astute researcher...sure a lot more DD than Hykawy ever did Investment Summary Our Bull points for Orbite include the potential (i) for near term revenue, (ii) to become a low-cost producer of high purity and smelter alumina, (iii) partnership with the world’s largest producers of alumina, and (iv) an international team of renowned and experienced chemical process engineers who have built, commissioned and optimized large scale plants. In our opinion it seems unusual to conclude that the TKS’s hydrothermal acid regeneration plant will be replaced, just because – as per ADEM documents - an auxiliary system (scrubber) of well proven nature is still undergoing optimization, and then associate that with the certainty of Orbite’s preliminary economic assessment (PEA). With the risk of stating the obvious, it must be noted that a PEA is not the same as a definitive feasibility study. It is important to note as well that the H-ARP for the Orbite process is expected to be simpler than the one at the TKS plant, and although Siemag has been contracted to design Orbite’s H-ARP, the engineering principles are well known and according to Orbite engineers is not actually that complex (for Orbite’s specific application). We anticipate that Orbite will offer more specific details about the SGA plant design and the viability of the auxiliary technologies as it completes its definitive feasibility study and it receives more specific details from its contractors. This exhausting exercise of paper trailing for problems with Orbite’s related technology was yet another opportunity to better understand the different parts of the Orbite process and the associated risks. There have been unprecedented attacks and so far unfounded attempts todiscredit Orbite’s project. We will continue to monitor the sentiment towards the stock. For now wemaintain ourSpeculative Buy recommendation and target price of $11.20

Share	Recommend \| Keep \| Reply \| Mark as Last Read \| Read Replies (1)

To: verjam who wrote (1408)	4/24/2012 3:51:58 PM
From: Peter Mare	of 5241

Great! Does any regulatory agency review the misconduct of financial institutions that disseminate misinformation? I have never invested in a company with this much mud being thrown at it. That's what unregulated capitalism is! Again, I wouldn't be surprised that companies that use the Bayer process would try to "eliminate" the competition, ethically or not, as long as they can get away with it! Here is a good example (and you have to pay double to kill that pain) :) : ca.finance.yahoo.com A Bank of Montreal comparison last spring found an average differential of 20 per cent between the two countries on well-known consumer goods. Brisebois presented her own list of 15 consumer items contrasting what Canadian retailers must pay their suppliers to their counterparts south of the border. Although she did not name the brand names, Brisebois said the comparison was for exactly the same item. Some typical examples: — Hair conditioner (1.18 litres) cost the Canadian retailer $10 and the U.S. retailer $6.23, for a 43 per cent mark-up, she said. — a 46-inch LED TV was $1,001.00 in Canada and $888.75 in the U.S., 13 per cent difference; — An automobile tire cost $169.69 for the retailer in Canada and $128.21 in the U.S., a 32 per cent difference. The biggest differential on the list was for an over-the-counter painkiller, which cost Canadian retailers more than double the U.S. price.

Share	Recommend \| Keep \| Reply \| Mark as Last Read \| Read Replies (1)

From: Eoj123

4/24/2012 6:29:59 PM

of 5241

As we're watching and waiting for high volume days which would be partly indicative of short covering, I'm thinking we will have to keep an eye on the Alpha exchange also. At over 1.4 million shares traded on the Alpha today, maybe someone is trying to be sneaky. I'm thinking the true covering will come with an obvious blow off, but what do I know.

T:ORT - ORBITE ALUMINAE INC - http://www.explorationorbite.com

18:38:31 EDT

Sym-X	Bid - Ask			Last	Chg	%Ch	Vol	$Vol	#Tr	Open-Hi-Lo	Year Hi-Lo	Last Tr	News	Delay
ORT - T ATS	37.7	1.90 · 1.92	11.4	1.92	-0.07	-3.5	4,726.0	9,108	7,118	2.01 2.06 1.79	4.80 1.28	15:59:59	07:07	15 min RT 2¢
TSX - T	37.7	1.90 · 1.92	11.4	1.92	-0.07	-3.5	2,853.8	5,496	3,231	2.01 2.05 1.79	4.80 1.28	15:59:59		15 min
Alpha - A				1.91	-0.08	-4.0	1,443.2	2,780	2,555	2.03 2.06 1.79		15:59:54		15 min
Chi-X - X				1.91	-0.08	-4.0	170.5	331	607	2.03 2.05 1.79		15:59:54		15 min
Pure - P				1.91	-0.08	-4.0	101.8	197	237	2.03 2.05 1.80		15:59:49		15 min
Omega - O				1.91	-0.08	-4.0	15.4	30	102	2.03 2.03 1.83		15:59:37		15 min
TriAct - M				1.918	-0.072	-3.6	74.0	143	205	2.046 2.048 1.798		15:38:36		15 min
TMX Select - E				1.91	-0.08	-4.0	67.3	130	181	2.03 2.05 1.81		15:59:37		15 min

Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: dalesio_98 who wrote (1372)	4/24/2012 7:20:34 PM
From: Terry Maloney	of 5241

>>«Comme vous savez, nous investissons beaucoup en recherche et développement chaque année, plus de 100 millions, a indiqué Mme Côté en marge du Forum stratégique sur les ressources naturelles de la Chambre de commerce du Montréal métropolitain. On surveille tout ce qui se fait sur la planète. Mais nos priorités de recherche sont différentes à ce stade-ci.» << Translates roughly as: "As you know, we invest more than $100M every year in research and development. We watch everything that's going on worldwide. But our research priorities are different at this point." >>Alcan’s CEO seems on the defensive and has to justify the decision to not use Orbite’s technology<< Or else she was just finding a diplomatic way of saying they have no faith in the technology at this point ...

Share	Recommend \| Keep \| Reply \| Mark as Last Read \| Read Replies (3)

Previous 10 | Next 10