SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Gold/Mining/Energy | Chesapeake Gold


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2343)5/15/2012 2:36:47 PM
From: ferris wheel   of 6072
 
Hi Claude,

Canaco Resources Inc just handed me a massive loss. Sold it at 35 cents. CKG is already down 15% since my purchase. Do you feel that this can be another Canaco?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ferris wheel who wrote (2344)5/15/2012 3:07:18 PM
From: Claude Cormier   of 6072
 
If you can tell me where gold is going, I can attempt to give you a more accurate answer.

All I can say is that CKG has 29 millions ounces of gold equivalent vs 1 million ounces for Canaco. Furthermore, CKG has a positive preliminary economic study that should be confirmed in the coming prefeasibility study.

The future environment for gold will tell if CKG is taken over by a major.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Lhn55/16/2012 12:22:35 AM
   of 6072
 
16 more days of May.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: klinker5/16/2012 12:22:47 AM
   of 6072
 

Gold miners need $3 000/oz price in five years - gold council

LIMA – Sharp increases in mining costs mean gold will need to reach $3 000/oz in five years for the industry to stay profitable, World Gold Council CEAram Shishmanian said on Monday.






Miners currently needed a gold price of $1 300/oz to survive, Shishmanian said, but faced steep rises in mining costs, along with the cost of dividends and host nation taxes.

"If this continues for the next five years the gold price needs to be at least $3 000/oz just to stay in the business," he said.

However, he was optimistic sustained demand would drive prices higher over the long term.

miningweekly.com 





Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: klinker5/16/2012 12:46:52 AM
   of 6072
 
goldcorp may 15th presentation... nothing new regarding autoclaves


Pueblo Viejo - Dominican Republic

Next New Source of Gold Production

Construction 93% complete

$350 million* capital budget for 2012

Annual output 415,000 to 450,000 ounces per year* in first five years

First gold targeted mid-2012
? 2012E gold production of 85,000 ounces

Life of mine +25 years





Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: klinker who wrote (2347)5/16/2012 8:31:49 AM
From: Zincman   of 6072
 
Physical looks even better now.

If 3K is needed.. what a battle will ensue.

1300-3000 range?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: klinker5/16/2012 12:56:00 PM
   of 6072
 
last thought on irr.. i am factoring in a reduction because the cost of the mine is set to rise.... the pfs will have the numbers..

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: klinker who wrote (2350)5/16/2012 1:35:28 PM
From: Zincman   of 6072
 
Message 28148987

One of the top concerned w/ Cheesekake... Randy might be selling into a contraction... ie buyers market...

Whodathunkit...

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Zincman who wrote (2351)5/16/2012 2:22:01 PM
From: klinker1 Recommendation   of 6072
 
$80 billion I thought i saw a number over $100 billion for bhp..... rio tinto is in the same boat as well... but this is great news for metates.... The big boys are cutting back orders for mining equipment not only because of the capital construction cost drain but because of their mega sized increases in production of the base metals are not guaranteed a market....

meaning capex costs for metates might stabilize as far as mining equipment costs go... a gold silver mine being a different kettle of fish in the overall schem of the mining business after all...

in my books this is good news for metates

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: klinker5/16/2012 2:26:40 PM
   of 6072
 
bad news for metates is the majors would most likely have to pay cash... the scrip value of their shares has lost its previous punching power..... the gold majors have a lot of cash flow but right now it is dedicated to capex.... newmont for one will spend over $8 billion on capex in the 3 years from 2011 to the end of 2013.. and it will barely keep its 5.2 million oz annual production rate if it doesn't actually decline... they need projects like metates to bring in the kind of production gain that will return to them to a production growth trajectory

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.