Gold/Mining/Energy | JBII - The Secret Catalyst Turns Plastics into Oil


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: Rawnoc4/5/2012 12:11:20 AM
   of 649
 
The company filed the 8-K notifying the public that the financial statements (10-Q and 10-K) shouldn't be relied upon well PRIOR TO receiving any correspondence from the SEC regarding the media credits.

To: Joseph B. Schmidt who wrote ( 21739) 4/4/2012 5:04:03 PM
From: oldnsalty of 21753
You're in for a surprise.

"On May 19, 2010 John Bordynuik, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director of JBI, Inc., (the “Company”), concluded that the Company’s previously issued audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on Form 10-K with the Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 31, 2010 and the interim financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2009, filed on Form 10-Q with the SEC on November 16, 2009, should no longer be relied upon due to questions regarding: 1) the accounting treatment and related disclosures of two acquisitions which were completed during 2009 and 2) the valuation of media credits acquired by the Company during 2009 through the issuance of common stock."
sec.gov 


September 28, 2010 (excerpted)
John Bordynuik
Director and Chairman of the Board;

President and Chief Executive Officer JBI, Inc.
1783 Allanport Rd.
Thorold, Ontario
Canada

Re: JBI, Inc.
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2009
Filed March 31, 2010
Forms 10-Q for the Periods Ended September 30, 2009, March 31, 2010 andJune 30, 2010 File No. 000-52444

Note 2 – Summary of Accounting Policies and Restatement, page 29 Restatement, page 29

18. We note that you have determined that there were errors in the original accounting for the acquisitions of Javaco and Pak-It, the valuation of media credits, and equity issuances, causing your company to restate previously reported financial results as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009. Please revise your filing to include all disclosures required under paragraphs 7 – 10 of FASB ASC 250-10-50, including a detailed description of the nature of the error, the effect of the correction on each financial statement line item and any per-share amounts affected for each prior period presented and the cumulative effect of the change on retained earnings.


20. We note you received media credits in print and radio in exchange for the issuance of an additional 1,000,000 shares of your common stock. Please explain to us the nature of these media credits and how you accounted for and valued them. Please cite the applicable U.S. GAAP you considered when determining how to appropriately account for the referenced transaction. Also tell us the facts and circumstances that led to your determination that the value of the media credits was overestimated, the amount that was charged to operations during fiscal 2009 related to media credits and the amount of any media credit assets reflected in your balance sheets at December 31, 2009.
sec.gov 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Rawnoc4/5/2012 4:39:41 PM
3 Recommendations   of 649
 
DAVID LETTERMAN'S TOP TEN REASONS THE SEC CASE IS TOAST:

(quotes from JBII's response -- my comments in red)

(1) Domark’s CEO and “the consultant” stated that the SEC commented on the media credits on Domark’s or Sports Quest’s SEC filings and the valuation of $10 million, which was ultimately cleared with the SEC. <~~~untlimately cleared with the SEC?

(2) Further to the referenced Skype message, the message is quoted out of context and the consultant testified under oath that “[Bordynuik] did not ask me to plug numbers, inflate the balance sheet in any way.” <~~~testified under oath defending Bordynuik and this was the star witness against him?

(3) Domark assigned the referenced media credits to JBI and that in making such assignment, Domark’s CEO represented that such credits were worth $9,997,134 in print and radio ads. <~~~media credit seller blessed them?

(4) JBI booked the media credits using the same methods and reasons used by the SEC reporting company, Domark. <~~~remember, the SEC blessed the media credit valuation for Domark and JBII merely copied that

(5) JBI did not rely upon the media credits as “selling points” in either capital raising effort.

(6) After review of the media credits valuation through October 2009 and forward, the business consultant ultimately agreed with the recording of the face value of the media credits at $9.997 million. <~~a 4th party now agreed with the valuation

(7) Defendants have developed and fabricated a 1 gallon, a 1 ton and two large scale processors that currently operate at a plant in Niagara Falls, NY. <~~currently operating making and selling P2O fuel

(8) Defendant Bordynuik also met with a CPA auditor colleague of Gately, who reviewed the form 10-Q in person. <~~yet another who blessed the media credit valuation

(9) JBI paid fees to Gately & Associates that may have been used to pay for the principal’s criminal representation, but state that such fees were already due and owing for professional service. <~~so much for the claim of lack of independence

(10) Defendant Bordynuik believed that a different individual who was a PCAOB, CPA auditor colleague of the principal of Gately & Associates performed audit procedures on behalf of that firm while the principal was himself unavailable to perform such procedures and the majority of the transactions within JBI (being its subsidiary Pak-It and Javaco) were reviewed and audited by Withum Smith, & Brown <~~looks like the audit was done after all

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: NewMoney_8124/9/2012 2:28:11 PM
2 Recommendations   of 649
 
Now the theme of Gilligan's Island is going through my head.....how I memorized Macbeth in high school.

http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=28069816

Perfect. That explains quite a bit. ROFL!!!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: geico_caveman4/13/2012 11:29:45 AM
1 Recommendation   of 649
 
The IHUb clowns are clammering to the notion that a former employee Elsley is instrumental in dragging JBI down?

OSC investigation??? ROFL!!!!!!

None of the pipe holders are going to say anything if there is anything to say to hurt their investment in this company.

They must be NUTS

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: geico_caveman who wrote (345)4/13/2012 12:18:56 PM
From: NewMoney_8121 Recommendation   of 649
 
I notice over on the basher board they ban everyone that disagrees with the theme of the board. Too funny. I was banned over there after one single post that simply said I thought JBI is a buy.

Not even an argument about my point of view just banned. LOL at that board.

EDIT: I also see that of the three boards relating to JBI, they have the highest ban number with 21. The other two come in at 8 and 11.

Pretty telling.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: NewMoney_812 who wrote (346)4/13/2012 12:23:38 PM
From: geico_caveman2 Recommendations   of 649
 
Yup, they try every tactic in the book to weigh the board in their favor. Doesnt matter really, The SEC's case against JBII is sliding into the toilet and this OSC thing is the last ditch effort to bring JBII down. Maybe those clowns havent figured out that the SEC's whistleblower email ist was hacked. The FBI sent out notifications. some of those dissenters will be receiving more paperwork in the mail and I suspect they will become the new defendants

oh the irony

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: geico_caveman who wrote (347)4/13/2012 12:28:08 PM
From: NewMoney_8121 Recommendation   of 649
 
LMAO! Yeah I heard there were a bunch of government websites hacked recently. OOOPS!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: geico_caveman who wrote (347)4/13/2012 1:23:45 PM
From: donpat2 Recommendations   of 649
 
"Clowns"?

How about a little respect for the victors here, eh!

And try to be courteous in defeat - it is a sign of character.

Then again if you have none ....nuff said.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: NewMoney_8124/13/2012 1:41:58 PM
1 Recommendation   of 649
 
They don't attack people on their board.

Message 28080217

Oh wait, next post.....

Message 28080242

Never mind, my bad.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Rawnoc4/13/2012 4:54:11 PM
2 Recommendations   of 649
 
Now that we flushed out the STUPIDS with MASSIVE buying following the low volume selloff, is everybody ready for a MONSTER rally?

Lemme hear it....

Is everybody ready?

Are you ready?

Enjoy your weekends. :):):)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.