SiliconInvestor
     Advanced Search   [ sign in ]

sponsor
Sponsor

 Technology Stocks | AMD, ARMH, INTC, NVDA

Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: SonnyListon who wrote (1466)5/12/2011 12:08:48 AM
From: neolib of 9707
 
INTC, like MSFT, can't seem to deploy their cash to innovate.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: j3pflynn who wrote (1467)5/12/2011 12:11:47 AM
From: neolib of 9707
 
...and will be able to almost match Intel Corp.'s...

Likely about all that can be hoped for given the long delays BD has suffered.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: neolib5/12/2011 12:18:36 AM
of 9707
 
In addition, the power brownout policy will raise the price of semiconductor materials in the second half as supply volumes are lower than expected. Semiconductor players including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), Nvidia, Qualcomm and AMD are all expected to see rising quotes.

From digitimes here:

digitimes.com 


And another one on Apple related demand/shortages:

digitimes.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: neolib who wrote (1468)5/12/2011 2:08:10 AM
From: SonnyListon of 9707
 
It only seems that way because they are so profitable.

Less profitable firms try to make a virtue of not paying dividends, but they often have little choice.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: neolib who wrote (1469)5/12/2011 7:32:27 AM
From: j3pflynn of 9707
 
Gives some cause for hope, at least. We'll have to see what ultimately comes out in the real world.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: SonnyListon who wrote (1471)5/12/2011 10:06:23 AM
From: neolib of 9707
 
Like Apple no doubt?

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: neolib who wrote (1473)5/12/2011 10:32:44 AM
From: SonnyListon of 9707
 
One is a components maker, the other is a consumer products maker, so I wouldn't see it as an Apples to Apples comparison(no pun intended).

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: SonnyListon who wrote (1474)5/12/2011 12:29:39 PM
From: neolib of 9707
 
I agree, its hardly Apples to Apples. One is doing a dynamite job of innovating away from its historical business, while the other is milking its historical cash cow without a clue what else it can do, other than shovel its profits to owners. Such constipation generally ends up badly. INTC, MSFT, CSCO. What a trio of tech powerhouses they used to be...

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: neolib who wrote (1468)5/12/2011 12:40:20 PM
From: gugie of 9707
 
"INTC, like MSFT, can't seem to deploy their cash to innovate."

Whatcha talkin' 'bout, Willis?

First to HMG, First to the last several process nodes, first to trigate, I could go on and on... You think THOSE innovations grow on trees?

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: neolib who wrote (1475)5/12/2011 1:00:32 PM
From: SonnyListon of 9707
 
If Intel wasn't ramping up it's 22nm process for an attack on phones, perhaps your assessment would be meritorious, but instead, well . . . . .

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQ
Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.