Gold/Mining/Energy | Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: scion who wrote (24616)5/17/2012 7:01:37 PM
From: dreaminbig of 34117
 
Hi, I'm John Bordynuik. IT for hire. I promise I'll put it back together as soon as I find my glasses.



Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: scion who wrote (24614)5/17/2012 7:25:27 PM
From: bob41 of 34117
 
The stress is just too much

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: bob41 who wrote (24618)5/17/2012 7:27:59 PM
From: dreaminbig of 34117
 
Don't be such a weasel!











I know it's an opossum...don't pm me.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: dreaminbig who wrote (24619)5/17/2012 7:40:37 PM
From: scion of 34117
 
The resemblance is uncanny - something about the eyes, I think...

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: dreaminbig who wrote (24619)5/17/2012 7:43:51 PM
From: bob41 of 34117
 
Of course you Photoshopped that!

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Joseph B. Schmidt5/17/2012 7:48:05 PM
of 34117
 
Where's the 8-K filing for yesterday's news? And should three unit be three-unit? How many clusters before breakeven, let alone profitability?



Successful Review of P2O Technology by SAIC

In conjunction with the financing, SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure LLC ("SAIC") was engaged to perform an independent review of the P2O technology and its commercial viability. The preliminary report provides a detailed analysis of the technology, process and business model for the Company's patent pending Plastic2Oil ("P2O") process. The report also contains a pro-forma financial assessment of the capital costs and earnings for the Plastic2Oil business model based on a scalable roll-out of three unit clusters.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: SteveF who wrote (24539)5/17/2012 7:54:07 PM
From: scion of 34117
 
According to the last 10Q the throughput...

ponzi_implosion Thursday, May 17, 2012 7:15:27 PM
Re: MadeBucksOnThis post# 183516 Post # of 183526

According to the last 10Q the throughput

is losing the company money hand over fist. If one were to assume that the company received zero cash from recycling, and that the gross P20 gross revenue is based on a $100 bbl sale price (Not that I believe the conversion rate and actual bbls) then...

$226K gross = 2,260 bbls
2,260 bbls x 42 gallons per bbl = about 95,000 gallons
95,000 gallons x 7 lbs gallon = about 665,000 lbs of fuel
665,000 lbs of fuel x 85% = about 770,000 lbs of 'Throughput'


The company lost $3,077,869 in operations last quarter alone

The way I see it each pound of throughput cost / lost the company about $4.00.

or another way to look at it that so far this year and all of last year there were about $514,000 in gross P2O sales / and there have been about 27,000,000 shares issued / sold. That works out to about $.02 in gross revenue per new share (2011/1st qtr 2012), and goodness gracious me, a whopping $0.006+- per share gross revenue over all. It looks even worse if you take the total debt / accumulated deficit (no net profit to divvy up) and divide it the number of issued shares....talk about a Lincoln log in the wrong spot....

investorshub.advfn.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: scion who wrote (24623)5/17/2012 7:56:04 PM
From: scion of 34117
 
Extrapolated loss for year $12.3 million

ponzi_implosion Thursday, May 17, 2012 7:23:58 PM
Re: Zardiw post# 183518 Post # of 183528

# of hours in the 1st quarter - about 2,200
Loss from operation reported for 1st quarter - $3,077,869
$1,400 per hour in losses 24/7
Extrapolated loss for year $12.3 million

investorshub.advfn.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Joseph B. Schmidt who wrote (24622)5/17/2012 7:58:40 PM
From: PaperProphet of 34117
 
EstimatedProphet on IHub did such a spreadsheet analysis in early 2010. Mr. Bordynuik could have saved some money by not hiring SAIC and just used EP's spreadsheet to see how commercially viable it could be.

Is he or his spreadsheet still around?

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: scion who wrote (24624)5/17/2012 8:00:06 PM
From: scion of 34117
 
Perhaps by 2016, with another $50 million or so in PIPE funds, they'll be down to $200/barrel.
If Oil has doubled by then, they could be at break even.


kezzek Thursday, May 17, 2012 7:41:20 PM
Re: Rawnoc post# 183525 Post # of 183528

Q1 was about $1,500/barrel.
So they are improving.
Perhaps by 2016, with another $50 million or so in PIPE funds, they'll be down to $200/barrel.
If Oil has doubled by then, they could be at break even.

Too funny.

This looks like the breakdown to me (per barrel)
Free waste plastic
$10 labor
$75 other costs of goods sold - unspecified
$1,415 SG&A

Of course SG&A will probably be increasing substantially with all the new high priced talent, plus JB's personal boondoggle.

investorshub.advfn.com 

Rawnoc Thursday, May 17, 2012 7:26:09 PM
Re: kezzek post# 159235 Post # of 183528

THE COST PER BARREL FICTIONAL EVOLUTION....

(1) $5,000/barrel was the fictional theory going forward based on Q2, 2011.

(2) $3,000/barrel was the fictional theory going forward based on Q3, 2011.

(3) $2,000/barrel is now the fictional theory going forward based on Q1, 2012.

How is it that with such small increases in sales, the cost per barrel falls by thousands of dollars? I thought we're supposed to take the cost per barrel of small fuel sales and extrapolate and scale that forever no matter how big fuel sales get. What's going on?

Reality -- as fuel volumes increase, as with virtually any automated process, the cost of production per unit falls of a cliff. In JBII's case, it will keep going down until it's $10/barrel. You have to literally make up costs when you're talking about free feedstock in a free energized automated hole turned into fuel. They take pieces of trash and turn them into $100 bills.

investorshub.advfn.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.