SiliconInvestor
     Advanced Search   [ sign in ]

register
Register

 Gold/Mining/Energy | Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna

Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: donpat who wrote (18975)2/17/2012 10:25:45 AM
From: SteveF of 34040
 
Of course it isn't true. Bordynuik had to borrow $50,000 from Expedite2/DE-JBI a few months earlier just to acquire control of TRTN.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: SteveF who wrote (18976)2/17/2012 10:31:17 AM
From: donpat of 34040
 
But BRIG said it.

Surely he is accurate in his reporting.

Only thing I can figure is it was a poor phone connection or somebody is playing loose wif da truf.

Surely not BRIG!

So - who was on the other end of that phone connection??

Just looking for info.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: SteveF who wrote (18976)2/17/2012 10:31:51 AM
From: jimmenknee of 34040
 
I think he thinks the Canadian PP was his in the loose terms allowable-- there is no reason to believe that PP money wasn't used to buy Expedite 2 and 310. 1st accounting for Canadian PP is ~2.6 million, over 1/2 burned through before he got to TRTN.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: donpat who wrote (18977)2/17/2012 10:33:15 AM
From: SteveF of 34040
 
Apparently he doesn't mind being lied to dozens of times over 3 years, being used to spread those lies and still wants to give the guy $$$. Makes perfect sense.

Finder's fees? What finder's fees?

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: SteveF who wrote (18979)2/17/2012 10:37:04 AM
From: donpat of 34040
 
I'm NOT the sharpest tool in the box so I find all this rather confusing.

I guess I'll have to rely on the SEC and those who know the details involved in accounting and such to straighten this all out.

In the meantime - I remain confused and wary.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: jimmenknee who wrote (18978)2/17/2012 10:38:42 AM
From: SteveF of 34040
 
there is no reason to believe that PP money wasn't used to buy Expedite 2 and 310.

Expedite2 cost $30,000. 310 cost $80,000. What did he spend the other $2,890,000 on by Sep 30, 2009?

I don't even see where that much cash has been spent on anything in their filings.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: SteveF who wrote (18973)2/17/2012 10:39:28 AM
From: dreaminbig of 34040
 
Are these some of those 19 pallets of tapes?


images.investorshub.advfn.com 

images.investorshub.advfn.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: dreaminbig who wrote (18982)2/17/2012 10:41:20 AM
From: SteveF of 34040
 
I was thinking the same thing. I doubt it tho unless those are the old ones he was already paid to destroy.

Can't be feedstock. That would be a direct violation of their permits.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: SteveF who wrote (18981)2/17/2012 10:41:58 AM
From: dreaminbig of 34040
 
Javaco cash $150,000. Was any cash spent on Pakit?


Expedite2 cost $30,000. 310 cost $80,000. What did he spend the other $2,890,000 on by Sep 30, 2009?

I don't even see where that much cash has been spent on anything in their filings.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: SteveF who wrote (18983)2/17/2012 10:44:34 AM
From: dreaminbig of 34040
 
I would think it would be kind of hard to read/mine them if they have been exposed to the weather. Wouldn't the tapes be considered feedstock?

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQ
Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.