Gold/Mining/Energy | Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: streetscraper who wrote (18926)2/16/2012 7:40:29 PM
From: donpat of 34114
 
I dunno.

I actually expect the entire operation to blow up in his face - actually or euphemistically - the result of amateurs in action.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: scion who wrote (18941)2/16/2012 7:46:55 PM
From: scion of 34114
 
The purchase price is $900,000, of which $400,000 is payable in cash at the closing and $500,000 is payable in a single payment on July 1, 2013 pursuant to a non-interest bearing promissory note (the “Note”). In the Asset Purchase Agreement, we made certain representations and warranties regarding the assets of the Sellers and agreed to indemnify the Buyer and its affiliates for breaches of representations and warranties, breaches of covenants and certain other matters. The consummation of the asset sale is subject to certain closing conditions.

FORM 8-K Filing Date 2012-02-16
Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): February 10, 2012
sec.gov 

(b) JBI acquired Pak-it on September 30, 2009. The purchase price was $4,615,000 consisting of 625,000 shares of our common stock and notes payable of $2,665,000 and $1,200,000. The Company has used the share price on the date of acquisition to value our common shares. The majority shareholder pledged 10,000,000 shares of common stock if the notes were not repaid within 90 days. In the Pro Forma Statements the Company has assumed that notes were paid with those shares and no interest expense has been accrued. Goodwill amounting $2,668,584 has been assumed to be fair value of purchase consideration less values of assets acquired less liabilities assumed.

Jbi/Inc · 8-K/A · For 8/24/09 · EX-99.1
secinfo.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: SteveF who wrote (16776)2/16/2012 8:55:54 PM
From: scion of 34114
 
In Jan 2012 after departing Wall Street I purchased 2 companies: Pak-it LLC which I have re branded Big 3 Packaging [B3P], and Dickler Chemical Laboratories [DCL].

Richard Higgs

Chief Executive at Big 3 Packaging [B3P LLC] & Dickler Chemical Laboratories [DCL LLC]
Chief Executive
Big 3 Packaging [B3P LLC] & Dickler Chemical Laboratories [DCL LLC]

January 2012 – Present (2 months) 4201 Torresdale Avenue Philadelphia

In Jan 2012 after departing Wall Street I purchased 2 companies: Pak-it LLC which I have re branded Big 3 Packaging [B3P], and Dickler Chemical Laboratories [DCL]. These 2 businesses dove tail together: DCL manufacture liquid cleaning chemicals used in industries and institutions and B3P manufacture water soluble packages.
The vision for the 2 comapnies is expansive, perhaps DCL may research and develop chemical concentrates beyond cleaning chemicals perhaps into Agri products such as herbicides and pesticides. B3P may produce water soluble packages for a wider range of applications beyond cleaning concentrates. The focus now is on manufacturing liquid concentrated cleaning chemical formulations that are then packaged in the portion controlled completely water soluble packs.

linkedin.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: zzzogly2/16/2012 8:57:42 PM
of 34114
 
Wow. Nice to see this wholesome trio getting their home back!

Less than 120 seconds after they got booted from here, they copied this site and set up another attack-site on Silicon Investor:
subject.aspx?subjectid=58596

It's a skeleton of what it was, since 95% of their rancorous attack-spam was deleted.

You shoulda seen what they said about this place.

investorshub.advfn.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: flptrnkng who wrote (18934)2/16/2012 9:15:33 PM
From: Steady_on of 34114
 
"So, the first design was a bust?"

Did I say that?

The first processor might have been reconfigured to the modular design of the production processors.

The first machine is a development prototype. It has been reconfigured many times during its existance.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: zzzogly who wrote (18945)2/16/2012 9:50:36 PM
From: scion of 34114
 
I wonder how long it will be before Shelly shuts it down again?

Rawnoc Thursday, February 16, 2012 9:11:53 PM
Re: arvitar post# 253244 Post # of 253252

By the way, do you see those numbers to the left of each post?

Subject 58596

Notice how they are sequential? That proves that not a single post was deleted there.

Quote:
You shoulda seen what they said about this place.


This "place" rocks, hence 1633 followers. Stick around -- we'll show you how to swing trade and make money. :)

investorshub.advfn.com 


SI renumbers posts automatically, and the deleted posts are not shown. It's always been that way at SI, unlike IHub which omits the deleted post from the number sequence.


------

Profile for Rawnoc

In chains - a "special" icon for "special" users who are currently supended from posting.

Member 9132266

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: scion who wrote (18947)2/16/2012 10:24:09 PM
From: zzzogly of 34114
 
Well, if Shelly cares, then she's smart enough to know how SI works and that rawnoc and his crew are lying. If she bothers to read the SI version, she can see what the goons are up to.

Hard to imagine that IHUB is okay with the goons mirroring one of their sites on SI.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: scion who wrote (18939)2/16/2012 11:40:44 PM
From: bob41 of 34114
 
LOL. Why is that not surprising. I notice that she turned around and banned some of the non-oldtime wags. Yup. No surprise. JBII pump will continue there also.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Steady_on who wrote (18946)2/16/2012 11:45:34 PM
From: SteveF of 34114
 
The first machine is a development prototype. It has been reconfigured many times during its existance.


According to JBII filings your "first machine" was actually JBI's third P2O processor. It's also the one tested for DEC permitting. According to that permit, if subsequent machines are different they require separate stack tests for permit approval.

As was explained here before the last stack test this part of the script was written to buy 3-6 more months of delays.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: dreaminbig2/17/2012 7:29:12 AM
of 34114
 
Local zoning and building code violations?

n addition, the Parties acknowledge that the Premises are subject to investigation and Seller has received notice of violation as to local zoning and building code ordinances related to the Premises. Buyer shall be held completely free and harmless relative to all such issues and shall be indemnified by Seller for any and all liabilities which may be asserted against Buyer relative to its occupancy and operations at the Premises (except for any actions which constitute gross negligence or willful misconduct by Buyer or its own actions which constitute knowing violation of law if the Premises were properly zoned for the known uses of the Business). The foregoing applies regardless of any release of liability Seller may obtain for the owner of the Premises. Seller has represented and does hereby reaffirm that it will undertake all legal proceedings and bear all costs necessary to attend to the pending zoning and building code violations and do whatever is necessary to allow Buyer to utilize the Premises for their intended purposes in conducting the Business pursuant to the terms of the Lease. Buyer has relied on this material representation in consummating the transactions contemplated hereunder.

Page 16
sec.gov 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.