Gold/Mining/Energy | Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: donpat who wrote (13079)10/15/2011 1:57:59 PM
From: donpat of 34114
 
OIL IS OBSOLETE

ANDREA ROSSI IP:

[0087] This is an energy equivalent to about 30,000 ton oil considering a pci of 10,000 kcal/kg for mineral oil; thus, 58 g nickel will generate the same energy as that provided by 30,000 ton oil, that is 517 tons/gram.
....
[0025] In applicant exothermal reaction the hydrogen nuclei, due to a high absorbing capability of nickel therefor, are compressed about the metal atom nuclei, while said high temperature generates internuclear percussions which are made stronger by the catalytic action of optional elements, thereby triggering a capture of a proton by the nickel powder, with a consequent transformation of nickel to copper and a beta+ decay of the latter to a nickel nucleus having a mass which is by an unit larger than that of the starting nickel.
....

worldwide.espacenet.com 

Ripley MUST include this in his "Believe it or not" listings.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: jimmenknee10/15/2011 8:34:12 PM
of 34114
 
Post Date: 10/15/2011 8:18:34 PM in reply to 68027459 by Rawnoc Board: JBI Inc. Reason: Off-Topic
"... but accuracy and bring factual is just a nasty habit of mine I have, ya know? ..."

Absolutely not (unless we note the irony with the misuse of the infinitive "bring" and the redundant expression of "ownership").

There are several pretty nasty tricks that appear habitual though :-(

investorshub.advfn.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: donpat who wrote (13314)10/15/2011 9:38:08 PM
From: donpat of 34114
 
United States Patent Application 20110005506

Rossi; Andrea January 13, 2011

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CARRYING OUT NICKEL AND HYDROGEN EXOTHERMAL REACTION

CLAIMS:

1. A method for carrying out an hexothermal reaction of nickel and hydrogen, characterized in that said method comprises the steps of providing a metal tube, introducing into said metal tube a nanometric particle nickel powder and injecting into said metal tube a hydrogen gas having a temperature much greater than 150.degree. C. and a pressure much greater than 2 bars.

2. A method according to claim 1, characterized in that said hydrogen temperature varies in a range from 150 to 500.degree. C.

3. A method according to claim 1, characterized in that said nickel powder is a nickel isotope powder.

4. A method according to claim 1, characterized in that said hydrogen is injected into said tube under a pulsating pressure.

5. A method according to claims 1 and 2, characterized in that said hydrogen temperature is a variable temperature which varies in said range from 150 to 500.degree. C.

6. A method according to claim 1, characterized in that said metal tube is a copper metal tube.

7. A modular apparatus for providing a hexothermal reaction by carrying out the method according to claim 1, characterized in that said apparatus comprises a metal tube (2) including a nanometric particle nickel powder (3) and a high temperature and pressure hydrogen gas.

8. A method according to claim 1, characterized in that in said method catalyze materials are used.

9. An apparatus method according to claim 7, characterized in that said nickel powder filled metal tube (2) is a copper tube, said copper tube further including at least a heating electrical resistance, said tube being encompassed by a jacket (7) including either water and boron or only boron, said jacket (7) being encompassed by a further lead jacket (8) in turn optionally encompassed by a steel layer (9), said jackets (7, 8) being adapted to prevent radiations emitted from said copper tube (2) from exiting said copper tube (2), thereby also transforming said radiations into thermal energy.

10. An apparatus according to claim 1, characterized in that said apparatus comprises, encompassing said nickel powder, hydrogen and electric resistance (101) containing copper tube (100) a first steel-boron armored construction (102) encompassed by a second lead armored construction (103) for protecting said copper tube (100), a hydrogen bottle connection assembly (106) and a hydrogen bottle (107), said apparatus further comprising, outside of said lead armored construction (103), a cooling water steel outer pipe assembly (105).

appft.uspto.gov 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: jimmenknee who wrote (13315)10/15/2011 10:26:06 PM
From: streetscraper of 34114
 
That don't surprise me.

I don't think, I have witnessed anything yet from him that was right.

He is a person that is lost with out Google and a phone. But it is still being debated if he knows how to use them.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: scion10/16/2011 6:23:51 PM
of 34114
 
I wonder if the mythical and elusive Data Recovery Patent that once showed up in the previous 10-K and 10-K/A, the same one that's absent from the lastest 10Q - was any more brilliant than the Data Recovery Method described below?

callthebank Sunday, October 16, 2011 6:16:38 PM


Re: Artiztic1 post# 138208 Post # of 138222

Thank you for correcting that.
But no matter how many corrections are made this COMPANY it still SUCKS.

HOW MIGHT YOU ASK? Well because you Believe....LOL

I laugh at that fact that when it's over I will have the the last laugh. Why?
Because I don't believe anything coming out of of person who runs the Co.
When I look at a person who has the same shirt on all the time it makes me think what is this person doing with MY money.

Oh sorry ...."WHO CARES" Nothing I can do about it!!! ROTFLMAOEDOTW

investorshub.advfn.com 

Artiztic1 Sunday, October 16, 2011 1:58:15 PM
Re: Artiztic1 post# 138205 Post # of 138223

Correction:


In my quest to keep things accurate - my previous post should have read:

I wonder if the mythical and elusive Data Recovery Patent that once showed up in the previous 10-K and 10-K/A, the same one that's absent from the lastest 10Q - was any more brilliant than the Data Recovery Method described below?

Step one: locate trash can:



Step two: Remove crumpled paper.



Step three: Unfold paper and recover data.






investorshub.advfn.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: scion who wrote (13318)10/17/2011 9:55:29 AM
From: SteveF of 34114
 
The weekend pump-fest didn't seem to attract any new fish. Can't wait to learn the details of the PIPE being offered right now.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: SteveF who wrote (13319)10/17/2011 10:01:04 AM
From: scion of 34114
 
Yes, it has been a while since there was such frantic pumping of JBII over a weekend, but there was nothing new on display.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: scion who wrote (13320)10/17/2011 10:04:30 AM
From: donpat of 34114
 
I expect something will be reported shortly - some obviously know in advance - thus the recent blip up - oh to be privy to insider info!

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: donpat10/17/2011 10:44:21 AM
of 34114
 
Hello Cheap Energy, Hello Brave New World

10/17/2011

Over on Network World where I’ve had a gig as a columnist for about 18 years, my Backspin column I wrote this week about a power generation system called E-Cat that is to be tested on October 28th. If you’ve missed the recent brouhaha over the E-Cat (which stands for Energy Catalyzer), you’re missing out on a three ring circus over a technology that will either change everything or change nothing because what is promised is, in theory, power too cheap to be worth metering.

The E-Cat is a simple device albeit with functioning that defies all known explanations.

In summary, the E-Cat is a cold fusion (CF) device (the inventor, Andrea Rossi, prefers to term the technology “Low Energy Nuclear Reaction” (which appears to be the same thing as CF but a less contentious phrasing). I’ll refer you to my Network World column for a more long-winded explanation of the background and theories about the device.

The problem with Rossi’s system is that it is too good to be true. It is claimed that the E-Cat only requires some initial heating to start after which the reaction is self-sustaining. The reaction uses a secret catalyst to transform nickel into copper with heat being produced which can be used to make steam, drive a Stirling engine, or be used for whatever you please.

If this device works as claimed, the world will change and not just a little but hugely and at every level of how we’re organized, how we make stuff, how we travel, and how wealth is distributed. And those changes won’t just impact the US or the Western hemisphere; they well transform the entire world because incredibly cheap energy is the ultimate game changer.

So, here’s what I’m wondering: If the E-Cat does work, how will ultra-cheap energy transform your world? Imagine the following:

  • Where today you use petroleum products for motive energy (for example, to propel cars, trucks, and planes) you will be using steam engines or Stirling engines. In theory you’ll be able to drive across the country for cents. What will that do to the trucking industry? The shipping industry? Aviation?
  • With the demand for gasoline falling overnight and petroleum becoming needed primarily as feedstock for plastics, the US would immediately become self-sufficient in crude oil. What will happen in the Middle East without the huge flow of cash from the Western hemisphere? How will world politics be changed?
  • An E-Cat system could power your house or office making the existing grid obsolete. What would it mean to make your personal and corporate electricity and gas bills nearly zero?
  • The cost of manufacturing would fall very quickly with energy removed from the equation. If you are in manufacturing of any kind, this will affect you enormously. How fast could and how would you rework your corporate strategy to become competitive in a market where prices suddenly plummeted (note that the suddenly reduced cash flows would play havoc with the finance structures of many corporations).
So, the E-Cat will be demonstrated on the 28th of this month and I, for one, will be watching with great interest and enormous hope because if Rossi’s E-Cat system works, it will be goodbye recession and hello, brave new world.

forbes.com 

Andrea Rossi’s cold fusion reactor (“E-Cat”) outputs 4 times the energy (electricity) that enters it. — [REPORT]

Posted on October 17, 2011 by Chris F. Masse

E-cat total heat output = 33.76 kWH = 121.5 MJ

Total electrical input energy = 8.97 kWH = 32.3 MJ





midasoracle.org 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: donpat10/17/2011 11:04:39 AM
of 34114
 
Can Plastic Find A Sustainable Destination?

Plastic is probably the most non-green material anyone can mention straight off the top of their heads. But perhaps the damned material can be put to some good, sustainable use after all.

In the United States plastics are made primarily from natural gas. More recently, a growing number of new technologies started to turn non-recycled plastics into crude oil, electricity and other fuels. Many of these technologies are already being implemented on a commercial scale in Europe, Canada and Asia.

One company that promises to turn plastic into energy, and do this cleanly, is JBI's Plastic2Oil. The company emphasizes that its process results in ultra-low sulfur diesel that contains 15 parts per million (ppm), which qualifies it for the label 'clean diesel' since its sulfur content has been reduced by more than 95%.

Patent is still pending on Plastic2Oil's P2O process but in July JBI announced it had entered an agreement with Rock-Tenn to convert mill by-product waste into fuel using Plastic2Oil's trademark technology. The agreement gave JBI exclusive rights to mine plastic from RocTenn's plastic-only monofill sites for several years.

JBI was founded by John Bordynuik, who noticed that plastic waste was growing while working at the Ontario Legislature back in the 1990s. He saw the problem piling up, literally. In the US alone, over 30 million tons of plastic are produced per year and only about seven percent of it is recycled, according to 2009 figures.

"Because of the new "disposable mentality" that came with plastic containers, we now are navigating the fallout of an enormous waste plastic problem, on a global scale. It's complex, it's far-reaching and it's intimately tied to politics and economics", JBI says on its website. Mr Bordynuik recently had the opportunity to present his vision at the TEDxBuffalo conference.

The company is confident that its process has the ability to transform the 93% of unsorted, unwashed waste plastic that is currently diverted or destined for local landfills into clean, low-sulfur fuel. It says it's commercially viable, could bring economic benefits and help government and organizations deal with waste plastic recycling challenges.

Meanwhile, a new study conducted by the Earth Engineering Center (EEC) of Columbia University and sponsored by the American Chemistry Council said there's huge energy potential in non-recycled plastics. In the U.S. it could provide enough fuel for six million cars annually, or 52 million MWh of electricity, which would be enough to power 5.2 million households per year.

"Plastics have a significantly higher energy value than coal," said Prof. Marco J. Castaldi of the Earth and Environmental Engineering Department of Columbia University and Associate Director of EEC. "Capturing the energy value of non-recycled plastics - and municipal solid waste in general - makes good sense because it provides a good domestic form of energy while minimizing impacts on the environment."

One of the questions that these plastic-to-fuel technologies raise is whether using plastic as a raw material for fuel could increase demand for the stuff, and thus perpetuate the cycle. But it's also a fact that despite plastic bag bans being implemented in many places, the material is not going to disappear any time soon. In which case, turning it into energy could prove better than taking it to landfills. The jury is out on this one.

justmeans.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.