Strategies & Market Trends | Items affecting stock market picks


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: russet4/5/2012 6:14:04 PM
   of 4331
 
German Ideology, EMU, and the Wolfson break-up Prize


By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard EconomicsLast updated: April 4th, 2012

blogs.telegraph.co.uk 


Returning after a week in Berlin and Frankfurt talking to the German policy establishment, it is very strange to read the entries to the Wolfson Prize on EMU break-up, brilliant though they may be.

One contestant talked of a secret German task force to break the euro overnight into 17 national currencies, others of the need for a planned and "orderly" withdrawal by Club Med and Ireland, others for jurisdictional clarity on debts so that investors can prepare in good time (I kid you not).

Yet if anything is clear in Berlin, it is that Germany’s elites think they have basically solved the crisis by pushing through debt relief for Greece, by imposing their Fiscal Compact on Europe, and by beefing up the firewall to €700bn (actually just €500bn).

They are on a different planet from City grunts at the coal face of global debt markets, who mostly suspect that Euroland’s cancer is in brief remission, and who know that Europe is going to pay a very high price for forcing banks, insurers, pension funds, and sovereign wealth funds to accept a 75pc haircut on €200bn of Greek debt – the biggest act of expropriation and theft in history. (The Norwegian Petroleum Fund has already declared war.)

The German elites seem to believe that a new cycle of global growth is safely under way after the nasty scare of the winter, and that the European Central Bank has done more than enough to shore up Club Med and the EMU banking system – too much, if anything, risking an inflationary surge (in their view, obviously, not mine).

Quietly overlooked is the frightening collapse of the Greco-Latin money supply. Real M1 deposits are still falling at double-digit rates in five countries, a leading indicator of very big trouble later this year. But it is easy to overlook such things if – as in Germany – unemployment is at a 21-year low and you are at the other end of the long cycle.

The idea that Berlin might conceivably have a plan up its sleeve to dissolve EMU at any time in the foreseeable future seems quaint. The sorts of City critics shortlisted for the Wolfson Prize are dismissed in Germany as chattering speculators who will soon be crushed by superior force of European political will – or merely deluded Anglo-Saxons (like me), sad relics from a declining nation that has missed history’s boat and is indulging in a big "sulk", as one person said in my presence at a dinner speech in Berlin.

It would be an exaggeration to say that German policy-makers think they have just saved EMU, or to say that they are glowing in well-earned self-righteousness, but not a big exaggeration.

Some clearly think it is enough to have played the good European by endorsing a bigger loan-fund (not grants, mind you, or transfers, subsidies, debt pooling, or fiscal union); that it is enough to be virtuous in thought and motive; that the German nation has redeemed itself after last year’s flirtation with a eurosceptic Sonderweg.

Let me be clear, I am not questioning the good intentions of the German people. The country is a vibrant democracy, and a model to us all in many ways. My contention is that their leaders are profoundly wrong about the nature of the crisis at hand, and that this misjudgment is lethal.

While there are differences between the Left (SPD) and Right (CDU) on the pace of austerity, they broadly agree that belt-tightening can nurse the Club Med bloc back to health. It worked for Germany. "We have been taught over the last twenty years that consolidation works, and we have come to believe it," said one dissenter.

It is an irritating comparison, of course. The debt-deflation facing southern Europe is of an entirely different character. These countries must claw back 20pc to 30pc in lost unit labour competitiveness against a formidably competitive Germany that is already preparing pre-emptive measures – through the Bundesbank – to crush any sign of nascent demand, let alone a credit boom. They must do so in a global slump, with punitive borrowing costs and debt dynamics from Hell.

Angela Merkel and Wolfgang Schäuble really do seem to believe that the Fiscal Compact can deliver their cherished "Stability Union", that debt-brakes can ensure discipline, and that economic expansion can be the moral reward of fiscal contraction – as if an economy were ruled by the crude zero-sum mechanics of a family budget.

There is almost no intellectual recognition – except among those who have lived abroad and worked in global finance – that monetary union has become an engine of contractionary havoc along the lines of the 1930s Gold Standard (which Germany should understand better, since it was the chief victim on that occasion); or that Euroland would be in crisis today whether or not the Greeks fiddled their books a decade ago, or even if Spain and Ireland had taken drastic measures to offset ECB stimulus six years ago.

Be that as it may, Wolfgang Schäuble is not going to oversee the dismantling of EMU – the project that he, more than anyone else still in public life, helped to create. He is a fanatic.

The risk is not that he will take Germany out of the euro in a huff, but that he will refuse to do so, that he will pursue scorched-earth policies until the bitter end to keep the mad scheme alive.

Will he demand yet more austerity when the time comes to secure the political backing in the Bundestag for yet more of bail-out packages? Will he drive half Europe deeper into its downward spiral of deflation and depression in order to save the dream, with calamitous results for German foreign policy and Germany’s 60 year investment in an enlightened post-War order?

Europe will remain in danger as long as Germany’s leadership class is packed with European true-believers. The Continent will be safe again only once Germany has rid itself of this ideological obsession and regained its rightful place as a proud, patriotic, sovereign state.

None of the short-listed contestants seriously backed the Henkel Plan – put forward by Hans-Olaf Henkel, the former head of the German industry federation (BDI) – proposing that Germany itself should withdraw from EMU. Most stuck to the conventional script that the weak states should withdraw in an orderly fashion to restore competitiveness and break out of debt-deflation traps.

I do not think that such an outcome can possibly by orderly (a point also made by Jens Nordvig from Nomura). It would set off a lethal chain reaction, engulfing Spain and Italy in short order. This in turn would embroil France through the exposure of French banks to Italian debt.

The only way to break up EMU without a disaster is for the Teutonic bloc to withdraw, leaving a Latin euro with the existing institutions of monetary union in tact and euro contracts upheld.

The new Teutonic 'Thaler’ would revalue. Exchange controls and central bank intervention could prevent this going too far at first, perhaps by 25pc or so to avoid a drastic shock to northern banks and exporters. If the Swiss can hold the franc at CHF 1.20 against the euro against the whole world, the Bundesbank can certainly hold the down Thaler for as long as needed.

Some Teutonic banks would be left underwater by their devalued Club Med debts. They would have to be recapitalised. Tough luck.

I stick to my view that such a plan can be executed technically, and would restore prosperity to Europe far more quickly than often supposed. I do not see the need for the convoluted plans put forward by some of the Wolfson contestants.

Will it happen? Of course not. Politics prohibit such a painless liberation. There is no figure in Germany able or willing to lead such a move. The intellectual ground has not been prepared.

Europe will instead hurtle towards its great, final, and obliterating crisis, cursed by sheer lack of imagination. The Project will be defended by its fanatics in the bunkers until the social, political, and diplomatic landscape has been reduced to rubble… and one day historians will ask why they did such a foolish thing.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: russet4/5/2012 6:15:50 PM
   of 4331
 

April 3, 2012

Greece Is in a Face-Off With Its Bond Holdouts By LANDON THOMAS Jr.
The battle between Greece and the vulture investors is about to begin.

Fresh off the largest debt restructuring in history, the Greek government is preparing to confront a small, well-financed pool of holdout investors who are refusing to swap their bonds and take a 75 percent loss.

nytimes.com 

These investors, who probably represent about 2 to 3 percent of Greece’s privately held debt, are betting that Athens and its European supporters — contrary to their public pronouncements — will prefer to pay them back in full rather than let the bonds default.

And that, analysts say, would create a dangerous precedent, not only angering the investors who took large losses last month but raising the prospect that Europe is ready to cut deals with hedge funds holding on to risky sovereign debt.

Officials involved in the debt deliberations say that Aurelius Capital Management and Elliott Associates, two well-known distressed debt funds, are among the investors contemplating a holdout strategy.

The latest round of poker with a sovereign debt twist will play out on Wednesday at 8 p.m. London time. That is when investors holding $26.8 billion worth of Greek bonds that are governed by foreign law face a deadline for deciding whether to swap their bonds for new, longer-term securities — some of which are backed by Europe’s new rescue facility — and accept a 75 percent loss.

An announcement of the outcome was not expected on Wednesday and perhaps not until next week. Some investors have until April 18 to decide.

The stakes may seem small compared with the 100 billion euro, or about $130 billion, restructuring of bonds governed by Greek law that was reached last month. That debt deal was part of a broader 130 billion euro bailout that saved Greece from bankruptcy.

Of the $26.8 billion in foreign-law bonds, holders of about $16 billion worth have agreed to the debt exchange, a participation rate of about 60 percent. Greek government officials say they believe that the overall participation rate may soon approach 98 percent.

Investment bankers and analysts guess that, in the end, the bond holdouts will represent a pool of money of about $5.5 billion — a sum that Greece, through its financial backers, could pay.

But if Greece and its European sponsors decide to redeem these bonds in full — one of the issues matures on May 15 — they will have diminished the sacrifice of the investors who agreed to the deal and given incentive to future vulture investors to pursue similar strategies with other imperiled countries in the euro zone.

Greek officials have been blunt and unflinching in their views on the matter.

“We are standing on an ethical pedestal here,” said Petros Christodoulou, the head of Greece’s debt management agency who is overseeing the mechanics of the country’s debt restructuring effort. “We speak with one voice with our official sponsors. This is as good an offer as the bondholders are ever going to get.”

For the committed holdouts, though, such talk is bluster. These funds have accumulated controlling stakes in a range of Greek bonds, the variety of which are testimony to a time when Greece and its public entities could raise sums in markets all over the world. Some bonds are denominated in Japanese yen, and issuers include the country’s near-bankrupt railroad company.

As many of these bonds are fairly small — the one that matures in May is 450 million euros — holders calculate that Greece and Europe will pay them off rather than let them default.

“The goal is minimum economic value, maximum nuisance value,” said Adam Lerrick, a sovereign debt expert at the American Enterprise Institute.

Mr. Lerrick points out that for Greece, a country that hopes to return to international bond markets in 2015, the prospect of a series of lawsuits from deep-pocketed hedge funds is unappealing.

The government aims to sell more than 40 billion euros of state-owned assets in the coming years, a difficult task even without the added threat that an aggressive hedge fund may put a lien on those assets.

The funds also take heart from a view that the International Monetary Fund has explicit guidelines that say it cannot lend money to a country that chooses to default on its obligations.

“This would create a bad precedent,” said Gabriel Sterne, an economist at Exotix, a London-based investment bank, pointing out that there is enough money in Greece’s latest bailout package to allow it to meet these obligations. “The I.M.F. might well say, ‘Pay these guys — there is money left over.’ ”

Persuading the holders of Greek foreign-law bonds was always going to be tricky. Unlike the Greek law bonds, which include clauses that allow Athens to enforce conditions on all holders after winning the approval of a majority of holders, the contracts of the 36 foreign-law bonds offer more protections for investors and hold that a separate agreement must be reached for each bond.

Last week in London, meetings for the 36 foreign-law bonds in question were held. Only 16 voted to allow Greece to initiate a so-called collective action clause that would force the terms of the swap on all investors.

The involvement of funds like Aurelius and Elliott increases the possibility of a protracted legal battle if Greece chooses not to pay. Bankers caution that even though these funds may be holding Greek debt right now, that does not mean they will sue.

Representatives for both funds declined to comment.

Aurelius, which has a size of about $2.5 billion, was founded by Mark Brodsky, a former top executive at Elliott. It has made its name by challenging debt restructuring deals like the bankruptcy of the Tribune Company and, more recently, a proposal to write down bank debt in Ireland.

Elliott, which manages $19 billion, has a much larger profile. Renowned for legal tactics that have forced governments like the Republic of Congo to pay out on debt claims, it continues to press its case against Argentina, which defaulted on its debt in 2002.

Another possible outcome, analysts say, is that the very threat of a default and a drawn-out legal wrangle may prompt Greece to give in — as other countries like Ecuador have done in similar circumstances.

“This happens all the time,” said Mitu Gulati, a sovereign debt specialist at Duke University Law School. “At some point a country just does not want the drama of being in default again.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: russet4/5/2012 6:18:06 PM
   of 4331
 
India's imports of gold and silver tumble in Q1 Precious metal imports into the country slid substantially in the first three months of 2012, with gold imports dropping 55% in March due to the jewellers strike and high prices.

Author: Shivom Seth
Posted: Tuesday , 03 Apr 2012
MUMBAI (MINEWEB) - Gold imports to India, the world's top importer crumbled more than 55% in March, with jewellers shutting down their establishments across the country demanding a rollback of the duty hike proposed in the Union Budget.

mineweb.co.za 



"The country would have imported just 15 to 20 tonnes of gold in March as against 45 to 55 tonnes that is usually imported on a monthly basis,'' said Prithviraj Kothari, president of the Bombay Bullion Association. He added that the high price of the precious metal also deterred fresh purchases.

Imports of the precious metal shrank to 90 tonnes in the January-March 2012 period, as against 283 tonnes in the corresponding quarter of last year. In January 40 tonnes of gold was imported, while in February around 30 tonnes was imported. The jewellers strike and the import hike in March depressed demand further.

Silver imports too were substantially down in March at an estimated 20 tonnes. Import of silver during the same three-month period last year is estimated at 300-400 tonnes. In 2011, almost 4,874 tonnes of silver were imported into the country.

In January, the government hiked the gold import duty from 1% to 2%. Again in March, import duty was doubled to 4%. Speaking about the decline in imports, jewellers said high interest rates and inflation were also affecting consumption of the precious metals.

Puran Doshi of the Mumbai Wholesale Gold Jewellers Association said, ``Though March is a lean period for the jewellery business, this year there were important festivals like Gudi Padwa and Ugadi. The spring festival too was celebrated in different parts of the country. These times are considered auspicious for purchasing gold, but due to the strike sales did not happen and jewellers have incurred a huge loss.''

He added that second quarter purchases would also fall to 150 tonnes from the 250 tonnes imported in the corresponding quarter. Given the current conditions, traders said overall gold imports in 2012 would not cross the 500 tonnes mark. India imported 969 tonnes of gold in 2011.



$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$




Jewellery strike ends as India defers excise duty on non-branded gold With government postponing indefinitely its proposal to bring non-branded gold jewellery under the excise duty net, jewellers have started making a tentative move to re-open shutters.

Author: Shivom Seth
Posted: Monday , 02 Apr 2012


MUMBAI (MINEWEB) - With the Indian government stating that it would delay the implementation of hiking the excise duty on non-branded gold jewellery, the bullion strike in India has been officially called off. Jewellers in Mumbai and several parts of the country were back to their stores Monday afternoon, expecting a revival in demand.

mineweb.co.za 

The strike by jewellers and retailers began on March 17, immediately after the Union Budget, to protest the government's decision to impose excise duty on non-branded jewellery and doubling of the import duty on gold to 4%. Market estimates have placed the loss at a staggering $2.1 billion.

Bachhraj Bamalwa, chairman of the All India Gems and Jewellery Trade Federation which had given the call to strike, said the government had assured that no jeweller would be forced to register to pay excise duty, and that no coercive action would be taken.

Though some retailers and traders staged a protest in New Delhi on Monday morning, traders in Mumbai and other parts of the country opened their stores late afternoon as the news spread.

NO ROLLBACK

Slowly but surely, the Indian government has begun to bow to the demands of the bullion traders. Though the Finance Minister has been adamant about not having a rollback on the import duty, he has amended several other measures. For instance, if jewellers provide a self-declaration that their turnover is less than $982,484 (Rs 50 million), there is to be no scrutiny from the excise department, the Finance Minister assured a bullion dealers' delegation that met him in the capital.

The minister has also promised to reconsider the decision to make the PAN declaration mandatory for the purchase of gold jewellery of over $3929 (Rs 2,00,000), in a move that would make consumers purchase their gold ornaments with a receipt.

"The tax on unbranded jewellery was affecting smaller businesses. It would ensure that several craftsmen would lose their daily earnings and result in large scale unemployment for several people in the country ," said Rameshbhai Sanghavi, bullion trader. He added that deferring the tax would help employment in the country to a large extent, though gold imports have slipped further in March.

India's gold imports rose by 14% during 2010-11 fiscal at 969.73 tonnes, India's Parliament was informed. Gold imports stood at nearly 851 tonnes in 2009-10 fiscal, said Minister of State for Finance, Namo Narain Meena. In value terms, gold imports rose by 36% to $36.29 billion (Rs 1.8 trillion) in 2010-11, from $26.69 billion (Rs 1.4 trillion) in the previous financial year.

DIRECT IMPORTS

Though imports of the yellow metal may not be resumed immediately in India since banks have enough stockpiles, the government has further decided to ease gold import procedures.

The Indian government has acceded to Tata group firm Titan Industries directly importing gold into the country, which will help the firm bypass routing imports through banks or designated agencies. This is the first time ever that a private firm has been given the go-ahead, setting the pace for other private sector units.

At present, only authorised agencies and public sector units like the MMTC are allowed to import gold. The move is expected to open the door to other actual users from the private sector to import gold directly.

Titan approached the Directorate General of Foreign Trade, under the Commerce Ministry, to seek a license for the direct import of gold. In its application, the company said this would help save 1% of their operating cost and it could also get good quality gold into the country.

On Monday, Titan Industries rose to a record high on the bourses. Shares were up 5.9%, after gaining a record high intraday. Shares in Titan have surged 34% in the year to date.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: russet who wrote (3004)4/6/2012 9:52:48 AM
From: teevee   of 4331
 
LOL.....The vultures have been thrown under the bus as the minority holdouts are forced to accept the deal, the terms of which have been decreed to indicate there has been no default.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: russet4/6/2012 6:53:41 PM
   of 4331
 
Egan-Jones Cuts US Credit Rating to 'AA,' Citing Debt

Published: Thursday, 5 Apr 2012 | 5:46 PM ET
By: CNBC.com

Rating firm Egan-Jones cuts its credit rating on the U.S. government to "AA" from "AA+" with a negative watch, citing a lack of progress in cutting the mounting federal debt.

cnbc.com 

"When debt-to-GDP exceeds 100 percent, a country's financial flexibility becomes increasingly strained," Managing Director Sean Egan wrote in his report on the downgrade. "For the first time since World War II, U.S. debt exceeds 100 percent."

The U.S. dollar fell slightly against the yen after the news, which came at the start of Asia's trading day.

Egan said he sees no end in sight to the increasing deficit.

"With an annual federal budget deficit in the area of $1.4 trillion, debt is likely to reach $16.7 trillion as of the end of 2012 while assuming GDP grows 2.5 percent, total GDP is likely to reach $15.7 trillion. Therefore, as of the end of 2012, debt-to-GDP is likely to be in the area of 106 percent."

Economic growth, meanwhile, has averaged 2 percent to 2.5 percent, with economic growth "at best stagnant, at worst negative" if adjusted for inflation, Egan wrote.

Meanwhile, Congress has done little, according to Egan. The bipartisan "super committee" that sought spending cuts of $1.5 trillion over 10 years "was a failure," he said. "Obviously, the current course is not enhancing credit quality. Without some structural changes soon, restoring credit quality will become increasingly difficult."

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: russet4/6/2012 6:55:16 PM
   of 4331
 
Food inflation seen back on the table as prices rise

Wed Apr 4, 2012 6:01pm EDT

* Strong correlation with high oil price

* Corn, soybeans gain on physical markets in March -FAO data

* U.S. soybean futures jump in March on tight supply concerns

By Svetlana Kovalyova

MILAN, April 5 (Reuters) - World food prices are likely to rise for a third successive month in March, and could gain further beyond that, with expensive oil and chronically low stocks of some key grains putting food inflation firmly back on the economic agenda.

reuters.com 

Food prices grabbed world policy makers' attention after hitting record highs in February 2011 and stoking protests connected to the Arab Spring wave of civil unrest in some north Africa and middle eastern countries.

Prices later receded, but an upturn which began in January, initally seen as a pause in the overall downtrend, has persisted.

The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) will update its monthly Food Price Index on Thursday and the organisation says prices could rise more in the short and medium term as grain supply tightens and energy prices stay high.

"You can see prices in the near term rising even further," FAO's senior economist and grain analyst Abdolreza Abbassian told Reuters ahead of the index update.

High crude oil prices have fuelled the upward pressure on inflation since the start of this year. Consumer prices in the 17 nations sharing the euro were up 2.6 percent in March from a year ago, despite stumbling economy.

"The food price index has an extremely high correlation to oil prices and with oil prices up it's going to be difficult for food prices not to follow suit," said Nick Higgins, commodity analyst at Rabobank International.

Energy prices affect the production of fertilizers as well as costs related to food distribution and farm machinery use.

"We really saw the (food index) declines in Q4 2011 as being anomalous and related more to sell offs from the threats posed by the European macroeconomic situation rather than agricultural fundamentals," he added.

The FAO index - which measures price changes for a basket of cereals, oilseeds, dairy products, meat and sugar - rose in February and January.

A U.S. government report last Friday with its lower than expected estimates of grain stocks and falls in soybean and wheat plantings, added to concerns about global grain supplies and fuelled a rally in U.S. and European grain futures.

Corn and soybeans are set to be the major drivers on world grain markets until new crops are harvested with strong price swings prompted by weather changes in major producing countries, Abbassian said.

More price volatility could come if U.S. farmers decide to plant more soybeans lured by high prices, he added.

U.S. soybean futures rose about 7 percent in March and gained about 17 percent in the first quarter of this year spurred by concerns about tight supplies as drought hit South America and smaller U.S. plantings were expected.

On the physical markets, whose prices FAO uses to calculate its food index, the average monthly price of U.S. soybeans jumped to $519.43 a tonne in March from $487.31 a tonne in February, the FAO's database showed.

But FAO's Abbassian said prices could still fall in the second half of this year with new crops easing market tension and driving full-year average prices below record levels of 2011.

The FAO is also expected to update its world crops view on Thursday

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: russet4/6/2012 6:57:39 PM
   of 4331
 
The Second Foreclosure Tsunami Is Coming, And Is About To Kill Any Hopes Of A "Housing Bottom"

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/04/2012 21:00 -0400

zerohedge.com 

In what appears to be surprising news for some, Reuters has an article titled " Americans brace for next foreclosure wave" whose key premise is that "a painful part two of the [housing] slump looks set to unfold: Many more U.S. homeowners face the prospect of losing their homes this year as banks pick up the pace of foreclosures." Thank the robosettlement, where in exchange for a few wrist slaps, contract law was thoroughly trampled by America's attorneys general, but far more importantly to the country's crony capitalist system, the foreclosure pipeline was once again unclogged, and whether one does or does not have a legal title on a given house, the banks are now fully in their right to foreclose on it. What this means also is that America's record shadow housing inventory, which is far greater than any fabricated number the NAR reports on a monthly basis, is about to get unleashed on buyers, shifting the supply curve much further to the right, as up to 9 million new properties slowly but surely appear on the market. And while many will no longer be able to live mortgage free, forcing them to go out and rent (and no longer be able to afford incremental iGizmos), it also means that the prevalent price of homes is about to take another major tumble, making buffoons out of all those who, once again, called for a housing bottom in early 2012. Here's the simply math: there will be no housing bottom until the 9 million excess homes clear. Period. Until then it is a buyer's market, even if said buyer is unable to obtain bank financing, as ultimately it will be the seller who is forced to monetize (or vacate if underwater) their home in a world of ever diminishing cashflows. The fear of the supply onslaught will only make the dumpage that much faster.

As a reminder, this is what America's recover shadow inventory looked like recently (read more here):



For those curious how much more foreclosed properties are about to hit the market, we have the answer. Courtesy of RealtyTrac we know how many homes were foreclosed upon in the period until November 2010, when robosigning became a prevalent, if short-lived issue, or roughly 330,000 a month. In the aftermath, this average has dropped to 227,000 a month: a roughly 100,000 difference in less foreclosures each month! Which means that in the deferred amount of foreclosures, over and above the already endogenous deterioration in home prices and declining household income, means that there is at least 1.6 million in homes that are just waiting for a green light to be foreclosed upon, sending shadow inventory in the double digit millions, and unleashing a selling wave unlike any seen before. Behold the deffered foreclosures in all their glory:



Translation: Just like John Paulson lost billions on his massively wrong way bets that housing would soar (ironically, after getting the move lower correct), so Goldman's recent bet that properties will rebound is about to cost the firm dearly.

Because at the end of the day, it is all about supply and demand, or, said otherwise, money.

Reuters explains further:








"We are right back where we were two years ago. I would put money on 2012 being a bigger year for foreclosures than 2010," said Mark Seifert, executive director of Empowering & Strengthening Ohio's People (ESOP), a counseling group with 10 offices in Ohio.



"Last year was an anomaly, and not in a good way," he said.



In 2011, the "robo-signing" scandal, in which foreclosure documents were signed without properly reviewing individual cases, prompted banks to hold back on new foreclosures pending a settlement.



Five major banks eventually struck that settlement with 49 U.S. states in February. Signs are growing the pace of foreclosures is picking up again, something housing experts predict will again weigh on home prices before any sustained recovery can occur.



Mortgage servicing provider Lender Processing Services reported in early March that U.S. foreclosure starts jumped 28 percent in January.

Well, no. LPS which is going through legal troubles of its own, unfortunately, is very much, less than credible. For the only real source on foreclosure data, we go to RealtyTrac, where we find that February foreclosures hit 206,900, the second lowest in many years, and higher only than December 2011's period low 205,000 (see chart above). But while there is no need to fabricate data, foreclosures will eventually come, as banks, first slowly, then very, very fast, start sending out foreclosure notices. What happens next will be entire neighborhoods with "Foreclosure" signs in front of the houses, doing miracles to prevailing home prices.








A January report by the Neighborhood Economic Development Advocacy Project in New York found that in the first half of 2011 the number of 90-day pre-foreclosure notices in New York City outnumbered court foreclosure actions by a ratio of 14 to one, indicating that while proceedings were initiated against many homeowners, they were left incomplete.



"Now the banks have a settlement, foreclosure numbers for 2012 are going to be high," said NEDAP co-director Josh Zinner.



A recent survey by the California Reinvestment Coalition, an umbrella group of nearly 300 non-profit groups in the state, of member agencies found 75 percent of respondents expected increased demand for their foreclosure prevention services in 2012 but more than a third had to scale back services because of funding cuts.



"Funding is a major concern given what our members expect for this year," said associate director Kevin Stein.

Needless to say, the return of reality, i.e., when one actually has to pay for living somewhere, instead of living 5 years without making a mortgage payment like the Ritters, means a return of ever louder calls for socialist debt principal reduction. What is odd is that nobody seems to care: certainly not the millions of other hard working Americans who would end up footing the bill.








All this has non-profits intensifying calls for the Federal Housing Finance Agency to drop its opposition to allowing the government-backed mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac it regulates to reduce principal for underwater homeowners.



Principal reduction involves reducing the amount borrowers owe in order to make a loan modification affordable for struggling homeowners. Republicans and the FHFA oppose principal reduction because of the risk of "moral hazard"- that homeowners who do not need help will seek to abuse largesse and have their mortgages reduced too.



"Until banks engage in meaningful principal reduction as a matter of course," ESOP's Seifert said after a recent protest at a Chase branch in Cleveland, "this crisis will not end."

Well then it won't. Because since every bank asset is another bank's liability, unless the government pulls a GSE, and funds the wholesale mortgage reduction (call it the "final solution" of ubiquitous and unquestioned socialism), banks will not do this. And while this next bank bailout is only years (at most) away, in the meantime we will see banks do just what they always do: foreclose once again, and release the pent up vacant homes into the market. Which for anyone who has taken Econ 101 means prices are about to take yet another dive lower, and the entire housing recovery plan can be scrapped. As to what it means for the Fed's plans for future easing, well... we believe our readers are smart enough to figure this out on their own.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: russet4/6/2012 6:59:42 PM
   of 4331
 
Europe and the Law of Sticky Wages (technical) How is wage erosion going to play out across Europe’s Arc of Depression?

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
6:41PM BST 05 Apr 2012

telegraph.co.uk 

The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco has an essay on its website showing that US wages in the industries in most trouble have scarcely dropped at all since the onset of the Great Recession - despite economic - even though the country has one of the most flexible labour markets in the world.

You can erode real wages through inflation, but it is nigh impossible to cut them in absolute terms. They are famously "sticky", as Keynes warned in the 1920s. Call it cultural resistance if you want, or human psychology, or common sense.

Employers are loathe to cut to nominal wages because this "can reduce morale and prompt resistance even in difficult economic times (Kahneman, Knetsch, and Thaler 1986)".

So how on earth is this going to play out across Europe’s Arc of Depression, with Franco-era labour laws still only partially reformed in Spain, and Mario Monti struggling to push through reform of Article 18 of the labour code?

Portugal, Italy, and Spain need an "internal devaluation" of around 20pc to claw back competitiveness within EMU. This means draconian wage cuts for year after year.

Yes, Mussolini pulled off a 20pc cut in wages with Fascist control over the unions to underpin his Lira Forte policy in the late 1920s. How can a democracy bring about such cuts in private sector wages without use of police coercion?

The Baltic states have done so in very particular circumstances, but mostly with devastating falls in GDP (26pc top to bottom in Latvia, and some have the gall to cite Latvia as a success story). Such economic contractions across Club Med as a whole would be large enough in aggregate to tip the whole eurozone into catastrophe.

The combined public and private debt burden in Spain, Italy, and Portugal is much larger as a share of GDP than in Estonia, and even Latvia. The risk of debt-deflation dynamics is much greater.

The EMU strategy of wage deflation across half Europe is simply not doable. It was tried in the early 1930s, with results of varying awfulness.

The 500 deflation decrees of Pierre Laval in 1935 led to violent docker strikes in France, with police killings, mass protests and ultimately the electoral uprising of the Front Populaire in alliance with the Communists - at which point, capital flight forced the collapse of the Gold Standard in any case.

The whole gruelling episode caused by five years of deflation proved pointless in the end. It pushed France dangerously close to conflict, some even say civil war.

This in a nutshell is what Europe is now doing to a string of countries.

Why? For What?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: russet4/10/2012 8:21:28 AM
   of 4331
 
Silver analyst Ted Butler had an extensive commentary over the weekend...and a lot of it had to do with the JPMorgan interview on CNBC last week.

caseyresearch.com 

"To my knowledge, this is the very first time that JPMorgan has openly acknowledged the allegations against it for manipulating the price of silver. Please think about that. It’s been more than three years, dozens of class-action lawsuits and a ton of reputational abuse (remember “sink JPM, buy a Silver Eagle”?) and this is JPMorgan’s first rebuttal? Years ago, I used to wait for process servers and Fed Ex-delivered cease and desist demands; but I had just about given up on JPMorgan ever responding since so much time had passed. Don’t get me wrong, I’m very glad not be sued; but I am a little underwhelmed with how JPM finally did respond. I can’t help but ask myself – why now and in this tepid a manner?"

You just know that JPMorgan et al's price fixing operation in silver has become blindingly obvious when the following question showed up in a crossword puzzle in a major daily newspaper in the Netherlands this past weekend....18 Across: "The price of this precious metal is kept artificially low by the business bank JP Morgan Chase." In Dutch that reads as follows..."De prijs van dit edelmetaal wordt kunstamtig laag gehouden do"or de zakenbank JP Morgan Chase."


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: russet4/10/2012 8:22:22 AM
1 Recommendation   of 4331
 
Transport Tales


We’re encouraged in our overall bullish posture by transportation stocks, both domestic and global, which have been showing renewed strength of late. Take a look first at the following chart showing weekly rail loads since the beginning of the bull market back in March of 2009.

oakshirefinancial.com 






The latest figures came in higher than expected and show clearly that the expansion is still underway stateside.

Next, look at some global data, including world air freight and marine transport equities for the last six months.



What we see here is world air freight stocks keeping pace with the S&P 500 while the marine carriers outperform by a significant margin.

Remember, the above chart graphs the transports over Q4 of 2011 and Q1 of 2012, the latter’s earnings of which we’re about to hear, and which everyone expects to be gruesome.

But if the transport stocks are any indication, we’re headed for growth.

Again, these are not freight rates, which are buffeted about by moves in the energy markets. These are equities, which are keenly sensitive to the pace of global growth and the price of crude.

Yet with everyone screaming that we’re on pace for a recession in the second (or third) quarter and with oil priced north of $100 a barrel, why would transports be on the move – particularly marine transports?

Maybe because the slowdown isn’t coming. As far as the Dow Transports are concerned, there’s no great expectation of a slowdown. Here are the trannies for the last six months:



The transport index is roughly two percent off its latest highs at 5390, the level at which resistance has begun to form. The true test for the trannies at this stage is whether they manage to pierce above that level or get turned back once again.

Other than that, all signs are bullish. All the major moving averages are trending higher and price action is above them all. Both RSI and MACD, are above their waterlines, adding some heft to the bullish view.

A Slow Boat to China What’s causing the pickup in freight transport this quarter is not exactly clear to us, but we’ve a hunch that the latest Chinese PMI prints are indicative of a rebound in growth in the developing world rather than a slowdown as most have predicted.

And this week we should know a lot more. Chinese CPI and PPI numbers are released Monday, along with trade balance figures Tuesday, and on Friday, all-important retail sales and Q1 GDP. If there’s going to be a continuation of the bull, much will be riding on China.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.