Gold/Mining/Energy | Manmade Global Warming - A Scam, not a Hoax


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Rock_nj who wrote (3110)4/5/2012 4:28:11 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie   of 3316
 
They Sky is Falling! The Sky is Falling!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (3116)4/5/2012 5:09:26 PM
From: longnshort4 Recommendations   of 3316
 
Obama can stop it. If he can stop the rise in the oceans what's a little old volcano to him. throw a couple of white virgins in and badda bing badda boom

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (3117)4/5/2012 5:12:27 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation   of 3316
 
'we're all gonna die' didn't work so now they have up it to EXTINCTION can't get more scarier than that. It has me shaking in my boots, but I'm still not gonna redistribute my wealth to marxists

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: longnshort who wrote (3119)4/5/2012 5:36:09 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie   of 3316
 
The whole thing is hennypenny/chickenlittle. And we know who the foxes are.

en.wikipedia.org 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: longnshort who wrote (3118)4/5/2012 7:58:02 PM
From: d[-_-]b2 Recommendations   of 3316
 
Obama can stop it. If he can stop the rise in the oceans what's a little old volcano to him.

The LA Times was right - he is "The Magic Negro".

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (3121)4/5/2012 8:53:01 PM
From: Stephen O   of 3316
 
Prevailing winds are from the West so hopefully I will be fine in Vancouver unless Mt Baker goes up first.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (3114)4/5/2012 11:32:37 PM
From: Hawkmoon   of 3316
 
Hawk, I hope you are not trying to figure out "the female mind"

Naah.. never would display such hubris on may part.. It's more about developing trust and mutual respect.. Which is very difficult one person spends the majority of their time communicating in a language I'm only beginning to learn.

And then there's the issue mis-communicating because of the language difference, although her command (thanks to American TV) is quite good.

It gets a bit more complicated (she's 34, but has lived a sheltered life), and I'm 47... No room for either of us to make mistakes about taking the relationship to the next level. Still wondering how she'll feel about a pre-nupt... ;0)

Btw, I think men are quite selective as well and women know this, which is why they spend so much money on makeup and nice clothes to make themselves attractive to men.

But security and ability to provide for her and her offspring is the major factor in mate selection, IMO (along with all the things you point out). That's why you see many beautiful women with some very ugly, but wealthy, men.. Let's not forget the role the "nesting instinct" played in the housing bubble.

And look at China, where women have become extremely materialistic and select their mates according to their ability to provide for them. Huge stress is being placed on Chinese males to meet these expectations.

Hawk

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (3116)4/5/2012 11:56:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon   of 3316
 
The scary thing about the Yellowstone "hot spot" is that is WILL erupt again, it's only a matter of when.

It's the same hot spot that carve out a trough over the course of millions of years through southern Idaho, leaving a path of thick Basalt over the Magic and Treasure valleys (geologists refer to it as the Snake River Plain Aseismic Area).


It's amazing to drive the outer perimeter of Yellowstone and see the hundreds of feet of pumice and ash that were deposited by the last volcanic eruption.. It also is considered to be the primary reason that the Great Plains of the US are so fertile.

Gaia destroys and then rebuilds.. Been that way for billions of years.
I just hope that I'm long dead and buried before it occurs again.


Hawk

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (3124)4/6/2012 12:29:25 AM
From: d[-_-]b   of 3316
 
The only constant is change.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (3123)4/6/2012 2:18:07 AM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations   of 3316
 
A perhaps over-looked outcome of the single child policy and the female abortions < look at China, where women have become extremely materialistic and select their mates according to their ability to provide for them. Huge stress is being placed on Chinese males to meet these expectations.> With the resulting large surplus of males, the males have to compete seriously. Women in China can conduct their eugenics processes quite harshly, not having to make do with the bottom 2 deciles. There will be a Flynn Effect on steroids in China.

While nobody says it, the China one child policy is actually a government run eugenics programme on a grand scale, but leaving the selection process to women rather than a dumb government department.


Just to put this back on the environmental track, this is about Peak People, sociological and technological developments over the next 90 years.


CO2 increases could yet become problematic, but there are going to be much more dramatic developments before CO2 is a problem. A huge population bust and quality control improvement will be far more important than CO2. Over the course of 100 years, people could easily move south, or north, or uphill, or occupy newly-exposed sea beds.


For example, if reglaciation arrives in 2020, people in NZ could simply abandon the south island and move to Kerikeri. People in Scotland could move to Morocco or the Sahara. People in Ottawa could drive to Death Valley.


Mqurice

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.