Strategies & Market Trends | Honey's Bob Brinker Beehive Buzz: Moneytalk and Marketimer


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: joefromspringfield who wrote (565)2/27/2009 1:07:56 AM
From: Web$urf of 2336
 
well that about say it, doesn't it. lol

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: octavian who wrote (581)2/27/2009 1:18:44 AM
From: Web$urf of 2336
 
Did anyone follow what i implied a couple months ago, asking this board several different times if brinker should issue a sell/or partial sell signal on market strength? what does anyone who follow brinker's signals think? is there any market action going forward that you would sell into?

i have another question. do you think there are ANY circumstances going forward where brinker would issue a sell signal, assuming the market is lower from here?

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: Math Junkie who wrote (583)2/27/2009 1:24:58 AM
From: sea_biscuit of 2336
 
I was saying that Brinker is an ongoing disaster. No wonder you didn't get it. You haven't got it for months now.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: octavian who wrote (579)2/27/2009 1:28:43 AM
From: sea_biscuit of 2336
 
You are wrong. Everything I said is true. Someone who said that he turned bearish should have no reason to hedge by leaving some money in the market. And the QQQQ disaster is every bit a disaster as I described. As for the most recent disaster in missing the greatest bear-market in 70+ years, no exaggeration needed there either. The reality is ugly enough.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: sea_biscuit2/27/2009 9:04:16 AM
of 2336
 
Futures indicate that the S&P will decline to 735 or so at the open today. So, at what point can we say that the 750-850 bottom call by Brinker is yet another failure - like his 7 or 8 or 10 previous "bottom" calls during this brutal bear-market? 5% below 750 (i.e. 712)?.... 7% below 750 (i.e. 697)?

In the meantime, if we go lower than 719, it would mean that Brinker missed a bear-market AFTER he admitted on the radio that he failed to recognize the bear-market up to October 11... Amazing!

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (589)2/27/2009 10:59:19 AM
From: joefromspringfield of 2336
 
Sea_biscuit told Math:

"You haven't got it for months now."

What do you mean months? He has gotten it for years. Here is what he was doing to protect Brinker back in 2001.



To: Chris J. Horne who wrote (13050) 3/14/2001 4:48:48 PM
From: Math Junkie 2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 34916

"I am getting tired of saying it. It is not about Bob making a mistake. It is about how he deals with his mistakes."

For you, I am sure that is true. But some people seem bent on revenge, to the point of attacking anyone who is not 100% negative on Brinker, starting false rumors that he cut off library subscriptions, attributing sinister motives to everything he does, engaging in ridicule far worse than anything he ever engaged in, trying to get him taken off the air, etc.

---------
A month or so later Bob Brinker took a call on moneytalk from a person who wanted to know why his library was no longer able to subscribe to marketimer. Bob said he did so because of electronic enhancements. I don't fully understand his explanation. The only thing I could figure is it might contain log on information that would allow non subscriber to access bulletins at his website.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: joefromspringfield who wrote (592)2/27/2009 11:56:44 AM
From: ZinDenver of 2336
 
Kudlow is similar to a clown like Cramer. But even Kudlow has said several times he really blew it. Brinker is in a class below even Kudlow now.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Honey_bee2/27/2009 12:42:34 PM
of 2336
 
While Brinker has never raised a dime in cash reserves during this vicious bear market, he has continued to issue new bottom calls and new "buying opportunities."

* June 2007: Declared that a secular bear which he said began in March, 2000 had ended in June, 2006.

* Aug 16, 2007 to January 20, 2008: Mid-1400's = "gift-horse buying opportunity."

* January 20, 2008 -- rescinded mid-1400's (recommended dollar-cost-average only)

* Feb 10, 2008 @ 1331: Low-1300's

* Aug 5, 2008 @ 1285: 1240 or less

* Sept 2, 2008 @ 1282: Low-to-mid 1200's

* September 16, 2008 -- rescinded low-to-mid 1200's (recommended dollar cost-average only)

* January 15, 2009 – low-to-mid 800’s

January 2008 Marketimer: "We regard the stock market as attractive for purchase on any weakness in the low-to-mid 800's S&P 500 Index price range, and we continue to regard the S&P 500 Index 750 to 850 price range as the bottom area for the entire bear market. We expect calendar year 2009 to be a significant positive year for the stock market....."

.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Honey_bee who wrote (594)2/27/2009 1:15:48 PM
From: Honey_bee of 2336
 
Correction to previous post: In the quote at the end, the date should read, January, 2009...

.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Kirk © who wrote (561)2/27/2009 1:19:31 PM
From: Math Junkie of 2336
 
"How well is that working for his advice to buy QQQ and not selling on weakness after recommending QQQ in the $80s back in 2000?"

Well, since you asked my opinion, it kept him from selling it at the 2002 bottom, and if it keeps him from selling at the next bottom, wherever that turns out to be, then it will have served its purpose. I'm not saying there are aren't better strategies out there, however.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.