Coffee Shop | Heart Attacks, Cancer and strokes. Preventative approaches


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: LindyBill who wrote (13139)11/23/2010 6:56:37 AM
From: Chris Forte2 Recommendations   of 24404
 
As the body of research linking periodontitis with a host of other disease states -- including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, surgical complications, and risk of fetal death -- grows, a new study has added yet another to the list: breast cancer (Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, October 19, 2010).

"To our knowledge, this is the first study on the association between periodontitis and breast cancer," Birgitta Söder, DrMedSc, PhD, Lic Odont Sc, RDH, a professor emeritus at Karolinska Institute, told DrBicuspid.com.

The American Cancer Society estimates 209,060 cases of invasive breast cancer in 2010, with more than 40,000 deaths. Breast cancer is rarer in men than women, accounting for less than 1% of breast cancer diagnoses, but both men and women should report any changes in breast tissue to their doctors.

Periodontal disease affects 15% to 35% of adults in industrialized countries. Most often caused by poor hygiene and bacterial infection, disease-active periodontitis also seems to be closely associated with human cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus co-infection. It is believed that these viruses act together to suppress immune response to bacterial challenges. Herpes viruses may also contribute to chronic periodontitis, leading the authors to conclude that these viruses and bacteria act together to lead to low-degree chronic inflammation and carcinogenesis.

"In severe periodontitis, probably there will be co-infection closely associated with a virus," Dr. Söder said.

The prospective study by Dr. Söder and colleagues followed 3,273 randomly selected subjects from 1985 to 2001 who were 30-40 years of age at baseline. At baseline, 1,676 individuals underwent a clinical oral examination (group A); 1,597 subjects were not clinically examined but were registered (group B).

In total, 26 subjects in group A and 15 subjects in group B had breast cancer. The incidence of breast cancer was 1.75% in subjects who had periodontal disease and/or any missing molars, and 0 in subjects who had periodontal disease but had no missing molars. For periodontally healthy subjects with no missing teeth, the breast cancer incidence was 1%. For group B, the incidence was 0.94%.

Of the subjects with periodontal disease and any missing molars in the mandible, 5.5% had breast cancer, compared with 0.5% of the subjects who had periodontal disease but no missing molars in the mandible (p < 0.02). Chronic periodontal disease indicated by missing molars seemed to associate statistically with breast cancer, the researchers concluded.

Smoking a risk factor?

The link between smoking and cancer has not been fully accounted for in many studies relating periodontal disease to cancer, according to Suellan Go Yao, DMD, and James Burke Fine, DMD, of Columbia University (Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, July/August 2010, Vol. 31:6, pp. 436-444).

"Smoking is a known risk factor for many cancers as well as for periodontal disease and tooth loss," they wrote.

In the Karolinska study, the researchers controlled for smoking as a confounding variable by using multiple logistic regression and dichotomizing smokers into ever smokers (current and former smokers) and never smokers, and found no statistical difference between the two groups. Of the subjects with breast cancer, 42.8% were smokers, 17.9% were former smokers, and 39.3% had never smoked. These numbers were similar to the group with no breast cancer.

Similarly, a study by the American Association for Cancer Research also showed smoking to be a less significant variable than periodontal disease with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention, September 2009, Vol. 18:9, pp. 2406-2412).

And in 2007, researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health found periodontal disease to be independently associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer overall, including in people who had never smoked (Journal of the National Cancer Institute, January 17, 2007, Vol. 99:2, pp. 171-175).

"Periodontitis in its advanced form can be viewed as a hyperinflammatory response to bacteria," Dr. Fine told DrBicuspid.com. "The byproducts of this oral inflammation enter the bloodstream and can create problems at distant sites. Inflammation may enhance cellular proliferation and mutagenesis, allowing for the development and spread of cancer."

Copyright © 2010 DrBicuspid.com

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: LindyBill11/23/2010 7:21:16 AM
   of 24404
 
"Noninvasive fat removal in plastic surgery

by Anthony Youn, MD

One of the hottest things in plastic surgery is noninvasive fat removal.

I've mentioned on Rachael Ray Show that fat removal without any invasiveness is the 'holy grail' of plastic surgery, and I still stand by it. I've gone over the Zerona a few times, but what about Zeltiq, a.k.a. Cryolipolysis? Does this device actually remove fat without surgery or needles?

Well, let's review the different fat removing technologies:

1. Diet and exercise. The best way to lose fat, period. But everyone wants the quick fix nowadays.

2. Liposuction. The only proven way to remove fat cells permanently. I do this surgery all the time.

3. Fat melting injections. Also goes by the names mesotherapy and Lipodissolve. This involves injecting medications off-label in an attempt to destroy fat cells by the caustic nature of the medications injected. Suffers from a lack of standardization and a bunch of yahoo plastic surgeon wanna-be's doing it (but not everybody).

4. Zerona. These low-light laser treatments have been shown in multiple studies to take off an average of 3-4 inches after undergoing six treatments over two weeks, taking niacin and other supplements, performing regular exercise, and drinking a lot of water. I believe this definitely works, and have seen some patients lose 8-9 inches total when measuring the thighs, waist, and hips. The problems are two-fold: Patient Expectations (I found most patients to be ultimately unsatisfied even with major inch loss) and Lack of Control (Some patients who wanted to lose from the thighs lost from the hips instead, and vice versa). That being said, I do believe it works. I just couldn't figure out how to get happy patients out of it, so I got rid of it!

5. Zeltiq – a.k.a. Cryolipolysis. This device acts by cooling the skin to such extremes that the fat underneath the skin becomes damaged and eventually cleared out by the bloodstream. Because the skin is much more resistant to the effects of temperature and trauma, it remains undisturbed. Initial studies have found approximately a 25% reduction in the thickness of fat after this treatment. Sounds good, right?

Well, sort of. Would you pay $2000 to lose only 25% of the thickness of your fat? That doesn't sound like a lot of change for 2 G's. I'm holding off on buying it until I see more impressive results.

Anthony Youn is a plastic surgeon who blogs at Celebrity Cosmetic Surgery."

kevinmd.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: LindyBill who wrote (13141)11/23/2010 8:34:04 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone   of 24404
 
I know at least 10 women who have undergone liposuction then gained all of the fat and weight back. You have to fix the problem between your ears before liposuction otherwise the problems and bad habits that made the surgery necessary are still there. They are the same fat slobs now then before wasting $5000 to $10000.
What a country.

youtube.com 

============


Liposuction. The only proven way to remove fat cells permanently. I do this surgery all the time.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: LindyBill who wrote (13132)11/23/2010 10:15:37 AM
From: Suma   of 24404
 
I have known two persons who have traveled to Brazil and they swear by him.. It's a strange thing as they were ill and now they are not.

It's puzzled me for a long time...

One had surgery..... Another watched him operate. So whether quackery or not this phenomenon exits..

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: LindyBill who wrote (13139)11/23/2010 11:12:56 AM
From: rich evans   of 24404
 
Not exactly what has been promoted here.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: LindyBill who wrote (13141)11/23/2010 12:00:23 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone   of 24404
 
J&J issues wholesale, retail recall of Benadryl
By The Associated Press, 11.23.10, 11:38 AM EST


NEW YORK --

Health care giant Johnson & Johnson is announcing another product recall, this one involving Children's Benadryl Allergy Fastmelt Tablets, Junior Strength Motrin Caplets, and Extra Strength Rolaids softchews.

The New Brunswick, N.J., company said its latest recall is at the wholesale and retail level, but the medicines still work, and consumers can still use them. It added that no action is required by consumers or providers.

It said it issued the recall after reviewing its manufacturing process in the wake of a series of product recalls over the last year. The company said it found unspecified problems related to Benadryl and Motrin products.

The Rolaids softchews were recalled because some consumers complained the Rolaids had an unusual texture that J&J traced to crystallized sugar.

The company recalled 4 million packages of cherry and grape Benadryl Fastmelt tablets, 800,000 Motrin caplets, and 71,000 caplets of Extra Strength Rolaids. All the products are sold by J&J's McNeil Consumer Healthcare business.

J&J has seen its reputation battered in the past year by product recalls involving tens of millions of bottles of Tylenol, Motrin and other nonprescription drugs.

In morning trading, Johnson & Johnson shares fell 58 cents to $63.04.


Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: LindyBill who wrote (13139)11/23/2010 12:01:36 PM
From: Lane3   of 24404
 
This is an interesting tale told by a vegan I read a few days ago. It was rather hard to read. Partly I felt sorry for her but mostly I wanted to smack her upside the head. A couple of snippets:

"“I’m sorry, I just can’t. I won’t.” I said to her for the millionth time, wiping the tears that were flowing down my face. “It just isn’t going to happen. I don’t care how sick I am. It’s wrong to eat animals!”

She leaned forward on her desk and made one more plea for me to think more carefully about my health and well being. “Natasha, you are hurting yourself. You are very, very sick. Your hair is falling out, your depression is back, and you are making yourself ill. You cannot go on like this.”

I stared at her for several long seconds, then got up and left the room."


"Of course, I never questioned why I was constantly hungry. Why 2 veggie burgers, a giant raw vegetable salad, and a bowl of nuts, couldn’t keep me full longer than 2 hours. It was exhausting, physically painful, and tedious trying to keep myself fed, but I figured it was worth it. I was healthy. Or at least, that’s what I thought until it was proven otherwise. "

voraciouseats.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: LindyBill who wrote (13141)11/23/2010 12:02:10 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone   of 24404
 
Many Are Blind to Their True Weight

Published November 23, 2010 | LiveScience


advertisement
Between the models who are too skinny by health standards and the many American women whose expanding waistlines put them in the obese category, how can you reliably judge your own weight?

Maybe you can't.

In a new study, nearly 25 percent of overweight and obese women rated themselves as normal or even underweight, while a good chunk of female participants who were normal or underweight reported practicing dieting behaviors, some of them unhealthy, to peel off the pounds.

Researchers from the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) at Galveston said that both body-size skews — people oblivious to their excess weight, and people who mistakenly think they're fat — are cause for concern.

"Overweight individuals who do not recognize that they are overweight are far less likely to eat healthfully and exercise," said lead author Dr. Abbey Berenson, professor in the department of obstetrics and gynecology, who is also director of the Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health. "These patients are at risk for cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and other serious problems."

One of the reasons for the gap between perception and actual poundage: "If more people are overweight who are around you, you're more likely to perceive it as normal," Berenson told LiveScience.

"I'm not fat"

Berenson and UTMB colleague Mahbubur Rahman analyzed survey results from more than 2,200 U.S. women ages 18 to 25, who answered questions about self-perceived weight, actual height and weight, and socio-demographic variables. For instance, the survey asked, "How would you describe your weight?" and participants were given the choice of the following answers: "very underweight, slightly underweight, about the right weight, slightly overweight and very overweight."

Participants also reported the number of days over the previous week they had exercised for at least 30 minutes continuously, as well as their unhealthy weight-related behaviors over that stint, including using diet pills, diet powder or diet liquids; laxatives or diuretics; inducing vomiting; skipping meals; dieting/eating less or differently; smoking more cigarettes (which suppresses the appetite); or avoiding carbohydrates.

The participants were categorized according to their body-mass index as normal weight. Overall, 52 percent of the study participants had BMIs they classified them as overweight or obese.

The shares of overweight Hispanics and African-Americans who thought of themselves as normal-weight (nearly 25 percent and 30 percent, respectively) were significantly greater than for white respondents. Fifteen percent of the overweight white women thought they were normal or underweight.

At the other end of the spectrum, 16 percent of the white women and 20 percent of the Hispanic women who were either normal or underweight thought they were overweight.

Individuals who didn't know they were fat were significantly less likely than others to engage in healthy or unhealthy weight-related behaviors. Meanwhile, those who mistakenly thought they were overweight were more than twice as likely as women who recognized their normal weight to diet, skip meals and smoke more cigarettes.

Guys, gals and weight

The study focused on young women partly because those were the clientele at the family planning clinics where the researchers sought volunteers. "In addition this age population has been shown to be at increased risk for behaviors that put their health at risk," Berenson said.

Even so, guys aren't immune. Based on research published in 2009 in the journal Epidemiology, men are even more prone to thinking their weight is fine when in fact it meets criteria for overweight or obese. For instance, nearly half the overweight men over 20 years old said they were "underweight" or "about the right weight," compared with less than a quarter (22 percent) of women. For obese men, 12 percent reported being underweight or normal weight, compared with 4.5 percent of women in that study.

Berenson suggests media could be partly to blame for the misperceptions. You'd be much more likely to see a fat man in a leading role than a pudgy woman, she said during a telephone interview, adding that being an overweight man seems to be more acceptable than being an overweight woman.

Adults don't just misjudge their own weight, they also point their blurry lenses at their kids. In a study published in June in the journal Clinical Pediatrics, researchers found 71 percent of participating parents with overweight or obese toddlers misperceived their child's weight as either healthy or lighter than healthy.

To keep people straight regarding their body weights, Berenson suggested doctors treat BMI just as they would another routine screening, like blood pressure. Just as a doctor might let you know your blood pressure reading is elevated, he or she would also let you know whether your body-mass index is in the overweight/obese range, normal or underweight.

The research is detailed in the December issue of the journal Obstetrics and Gynecology.

* Top 7 Biggest Diet Myths

* 5 Myths About Women's Bodies

* Never Too Late: 5 Bad Habits You Should Still Quit

Print Close

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Travis_Bickle11/23/2010 4:02:06 PM
1 Recommendation   of 24404
 
Functional amino acids are being investigated by researchers for their ability to regulate key metabolic pathways and improve human health, growth, development and reproduction.

Building upon current animal research, Dr. Guoyao Wu recommends “nonessential amino acids be provided to humans to prevent chronic disease.”

For example, it is known that the amino acid arginine helps to prevent obesity.

“Currently in the U.S., more than 60 percent of adults are overweight or obese,” he said. “Globally, more than 300 million adults are obese and more than 1 billion are overweight. Also, a large number of children in the U.S. and other countries are overweight or obese. The most urgent needs of new research in amino acids and health are the roles of functional amino acids in the treatment and prevention of obesity and its associated cardiovascular dysfunction.”

In addition to arginine, studies have shown that leucine has a strong effect on insulin response as well as sparing muscle during periods of caloric restriction.

Unfortunately, researching the many potential health benefits of amino acids is not a priority for Big Pharma.

They can’t slap a patent on arginine or leucine, so what’s the point of spending the big bucks.

Too bad for us.

healthhabits.ca 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: LindyBill11/23/2010 5:09:31 PM
   of 24404
 
"Nutrition Data Health: Self.com

The national emphasis on low-fat eating over the last four decades has been a mistake, according to nutrition experts on a debate panel at the recent Boston meeting of the American Dietetic Association.

It's been thought for years that high dietary fat consumption caused or contributed greatly to heart disease, strokes, and poor circulation. The idea is often referred to as the Diet-Heart Hypothesis. The concept typically blames saturated fats and cholesterol (both mostly from animal sources) as important contributors, too. I began questioning the theory in the summer of 2009.

The chairman of Harvard's School of Public Health, Dr. Walter Willett, was on the expert panel. He believes that shunning dietary fat was misguided, in retrospect. We ended up replacing fats, including saturated fats, with refined carbohydrates such as sugar and flour. It now seems that didn't do much good, and may have contributed to the overweight and obesity epidemic we see now. The other panelists agreed.

It may do some good to replace saturated fats with mono- and polyunsaturated fats, such as olive oil and other plant-based oils. But even that's debatable.

This news is a major shift in nutrition science, and goes against the grain of what dietitians and nutritionists have been taught for the last four decades. Will the dietitians take it to heart and alter their advice to clients? How soon? Only time will tell for sure. I predict it will be another 10 years before this filters down to the hoi polloi.

But now you know!


self.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.