Politics | Politics of Energy


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Bearcatbob who wrote (27742)8/22/2011 8:03:42 AM
From: Brumar89   of 40059
 
The anti-conventional agenda seems to be the thing Obama is most loyal to.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Brumar898/22/2011 8:38:04 AM
   of 40059
 
Fly ash from coal plants important for high speed rail?


'Judgment day' fears for high-speed rail tracks


Stephen Chen
Jan 10, 2011
Construction of the mainland's massive high-speed rail network is in danger of becoming a victim of its own success.

The breakneck speed at which track is being laid means engineers are likely to have to sacrifice quality for quantity on the lines' foundations which could ultimately halve their lifespan.

The problem lies in the use of high-quality fly ash, a fine powder chemically identical to volcanic ash, collected from the chimneys of coal-fired power plants. When mixed with cement and gravel, it can give the tracks' concrete base a lifespan of 100 years.

According to a study by the First Survey and Design Institute of China Railways in 2008, coal-fired power plants on the mainland could produce enough high-quality fly ash for the construction of 100 kilometres of high-speed railway tracks a year.

But more than 1,500 kilometres of track have been laid annually for the past five years. This year 4,500 kilometres of track will be laid with the completion of the world's longest high-speed railway line, between Beijing and Shanghai. Fly ash required for that 1,318-kilometre line would be more than that produced by all the coal-fired power plants in the world.

Enter low-quality fly ash.



Professor Wang Lan , lead scientist at the Cement and New Building Materials Research Institute under the China Building Materials Academy, said that given poor quality control on the mainland, the use of low-quality fly ash, and other low-grade construction materials, was "almost inevitable" in high-speed railway construction.

And that could have fatal consequences, Wang said. With a catalytic function almost opposite to that of good fly ash, the bad fly ash could significantly weaken railway line foundations and shorten a railway's lifespan by about half. That would mean China's high-speed rail tracks would last only 50 years.

But Zhu Ming - a researcher at Southwest Jiaotoing University's School of Civil Engineering who experimented with fly ash at a Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railway construction site last year - was even more pessimistic.

The use of low-quality fly ash would threaten the safety of rail passengers and "judgment day" might come sooner than expected, Zhu said.

"Quality problems with Chinese high-speed railways will arise in five years," he said. "I'm not talking about small problems, but big problems. Small problems such as occasional cracks and slips that delay trains for hours have already occurred. Big problems that will postpone an entire line for days, if not weeks, will come soon.

"When that happens, the miracle of Chinese high-speed rail will be reduced to dust."

The 2008 study conducted by Yin Yaxiong , senior engineer at the First Survey and Design Institute of China Railways, concluded that though China produced more than 100 million tonnes of fly ash a year, only a small fraction of it would meet the quality requirements for high-speed rail construction.

In high-quality fly ash, the presence of unburnt carbon is extremely low. Coal-fired power plants with large, advanced furnaces are the main producers, but on the mainland, especially in less developed provinces, there are few such power plants.

Most fly ash on the market comes from small or medium-sized plants whose furnaces cannot achieve full combustion, therefore producing low-grade fly ash with higher levels of carbon.

The unburnt carbon in fly ash seizes water molecules. Cement needs lots of water for the chemical reaction that makes it set and harden. Wang said that the bad fly ash competed with cement for water and messed up the reaction.

"Without an adequate ... reaction, high-speed rail is lying not on a concrete foundation, but sand," he said.

Reports about the widespread use of low-quality fly ash in high-speed railway construction began surfacing in mainland newspapers in 2007. Undercover journalists followed fly ash convoys from power plants to railway construction sites in various provinces. Their reports generated a public outcry, prompting the Ministry of Railways to team up with the Communist Party's Propaganda Department in ordering newspapers to kill all reports about low-quality fly ash related to high-speed railways. Some journalists received threats. Some lost their jobs.

Since the 1950s, Chinese civil engineers have tried to use fly ash in building construction, and the dangers of low-quality fly ash are widely known.

In a bid to ensure that only high-quality fly ash is used, the Ministry of Railways has set up testing laboratories at major construction sites. But fly ash suppliers sidestep the testing process, according to a Beijing-based journalist who spent three months investigating them during construction of the Guiyang to Guangzhou high-speed railway line last year. He requested anonymity.

Arriving at a railway construction site on the Guizhou-Guangxi border with a convoy of trucks carrying low-quality fly ash produced by a small coal-fired plant, the journalist said he saw the trucks drive directly to a cement mixing facility and unload straight into it.

"No sampling, no testing and no questions asked," the journalist said.

When that was completed, the convoy leader entered a building nearby with a bag of fly ash that he had in his pocket.

In the temporary building was a small laboratory and in the bag was high-quality fly ash. The man handed the laboratory clerk the bag for sampling - with an envelope containing a bribe - usually 10 to 20 per cent of the fly ash price, the journalist said.

Zhang Shuguan , deputy chief engineer for the Ministry of Railways, told Xinhua last month that the speeds on high-speed railways would reach 500km/h by 2050.

But Zhu said the average speed of trains on Chinese high-speed railways would probably decrease.

The system must endure the daily, if not hourly, grinding and twisting of heavily built passenger trains travelling at 350km/h, Zhu said.

Such operations would significantly speed up ageing of the railways. Some people had already urged that operations be slowed down to save the lines.

"We will need luck to maintain 250km/h for long." he said. Copyright (c) 2011. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

topics.scmp.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Brumar898/22/2011 10:19:58 AM
2 Recommendations   of 40059
 
The Obama administration's Environmental Protection Agency (or EPA) is controlled by left-wing ideologues who are using their positions to damage nearly every industry in America. That is their intention. That is their goal.

Consider the recent actions of the EPA and its related bureaucracies, who ostensibly act with the consent of the American people to protect the environment:

• Southern Co., parent of Alabama Power, critical of EPA emission rule: "Southern Co. would have to spend billions retrofitting, upgrading or closing its coal-fired power plants under tough new emissions standards proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency, and Alabama's utility regulator is backing the industry's complaints that the changes would increase power bills and threaten reliability... The Atlanta-based utility giant, in a strongly worded, 200-page submission to the EPA, says the long-term price tag of several new environmental proposals is at least $13 billion."

• Coal Regs Would Kill Jobs, Boost Energy Bills: "Two new EPA pollution regulations will slam the coal industry so hard that hundreds of thousands of jobs will be lost, and electric rates will skyrocket 11 percent to over 23 percent, according to a new study based on government data... Overall, the rules aimed at making the air cleaner could cost the coal-fired power plant industry $180 billion..."

• To EPA, milk is ' toxic sludge': "Imagine treating milk the same as the toxic sludge now washing up on Gulf Coast beaches... It may sound absurd, but some dairy producers are worried that it could happen under U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations intended to prevent oil spills from polluting waterways."

• CEI Releases Global Warming Study Censored by EPA: "The Competitive Enterprise Institute is today making public an internal study on climate science which was suppressed by the Environmental Protection Agency. Internal EPA email messages, released by CEI earlier in the week, indicate that the report was kept under wraps and its author silenced because of pressure to support the Administration’s agenda of regulating carbon dioxide."

• Energy in America: EPA Rules Force Shell to Abandon Oil Drilling Plans: "Shell Oil Company has announced it must scrap efforts to drill for oil this summer in the Arctic Ocean off the northern coast of Alaska. The decision comes following a ruling by the EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board to withhold critical air permits... Shell has spent five years and nearly $4 billion dollars on plans to explore for oil in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas. The leases alone cost $2.2 billion."

• White House, EPA ignore Small Business Admin’s report that new coal regulations will kill jobs, economy: "President Barack Obama is ignoring heated concerns from within his own administration that new Environmental Protection Agency coal industry regulations will be economically devastating... The EPA is plowing forward with new Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) mandates. The regulations would force coal energy plants to install giant scrubber-like materials inside smokestacks to capture and cleanse carbon particles before their atmospheric release."

• Administration blocks more Bush-era oil shale development leases: "The Interior Department on Wednesday blocked a Bush administration plan to open parts of the Mountain West for oil shale development, announcing that it would first study the water, power and land-use issues that complicate one of the nation's most abundant but controversial untapped sources of energy."

• Obama administration reverses Bush wilderness policy: "U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced on Thursday that the federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will again have the authority to set aside large areas of federally owned territory in the West that it deems deserving of wilderness protection."

• Plans for massive oil pipeline opposed by environmentalists: "More than 1,000 activists -- including NASA climatologist James Hansen, who has urged the scientific community to "get involved in this fray" -- are expected to descend on the White House starting Sunday for three weeks of civil disobedience and mass arrests. Six California activists are driving from Sacramento to Washington, D.C., as part of a "No Tar Sands Caravan" that leaves Sunday... The American Petroleum Institute and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, both of which are urging the State Department to approve the project, held a conference call with journalists Thursday in which they claimed the pipeline could generate 20,000 new jobs."

• Energy Secretary Chu Embraces High Gas Prices, Again: "This weekend, Energy Secretary Steven Chu appeared on Fox News Sunday and host Chris Wallace asked him about his desire in 2008 for Americans to punitively pay more at the pump in order to wean them off of gasoline. Shockingly, Chu did not walk back his comments as he has attempted to do in the past. In fact, he embraced the strategy noting that his focus is to ease the pain felt by his energy policies by forcing automakers to make more fuel-efficient automobiles."

• Obama's New Fuel Economy Standards Will Increase Cost of a Car More Than $11,000: "The Obama Administration’s new fuel economy standards will cause the retail price of average motor vehicles to increase over $11,000, according to a study conducted by the Center for Automotive Research."

Everything this administration does is intended to make Americans suffer. Every single thing.

If we don't crush the Democrats at the voting booth in 2012, I fear that the great American experiment will be finished.

directorblue.blogspot.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: teevee who wrote (27740)8/22/2011 10:37:47 AM
From: mindmeld   of 40059
 
Sounds like you are fully buying the money flow theories, which espouse the need for a fiat currency completely unbacked by gold, which allows for flexibility in money supply growth to accommodate true economic transactional growth demand. I understand those theories and I agree with them. However, when you combine that with Keynesianism, you have a recipe for disaster.

For example, if there are only $100 in a micro economy and 5 actors, you may have enough $1 bills to fulfill most value exchange transactions. However, if those 5 actors have 10 kids and those 10 kids have 20, then it is fair to say that the number of transactions has gone up at least prorata and probably more. If there are more transactions, then you need more currency units to fulfill those transactions. If you don't get it, then some transactions don't take place, which means you've just put an artificial limit on the growth potential of your economy. This is a legitimate reason for growth in the money supply...so that your economy can grow at full potential.

So I do understand your point. However, you and I disagree on something more fundamental. You believe that global growth has outgrown the money supply of the USD. I believe you are mistaken, catastrophically so. Money supply should only grow as demand grows. If Demand growth comes from artificial means like sovereigns spending beyond their long term sustainable capabilities, due to long term deficit spending, and if debt has become the source of global economic instability, then the addition of more liquidity does not help. In fact, it causes more problems, because full potential is far below what is assumed by simplistic aggregation of global GDP. In other words, when 10% of your GDP comes from borrowing money, then that GDP number needs to be lowered by the debt financed deficit amount to get a better read on full potential.

This world does not need more debt and it does not need more liquidity. This world, more specifically, the developed world is drowning in debt and unused liquidity. Itneeds to allow their economies to contract to where growth gets back in line with long term, sustainable growth as dictated by their own population and business growth, not as dictated by excessive growth of government, which leads to bloated GDPs and debt to support the bloated GDP.

When true underlying business and consumer demand is not there, and govt's take it on themselves to generate demand out of the thin air and then create more debt and liquidity to do so, then extreme MALinvestment occurs, which compounds the problem. That is where we find ourselves today. Massive distortions in most asset classes and malinvestment economy-wide.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Brumar89 who wrote (27745)8/22/2011 10:40:16 AM
From: miraje   of 40059
 
I wish I could give multiple recs to that post. IMO, the EPA is, by far and away, the most radical and dangerous anti American, job and growth killing agency in the Federal government today. If Congress had the guts to put the clamps on those eco lunatics, it would do wonders in jump starting the economy and lowering unemployment.

Blue collar Dem workers need to wake up and realize that Obama and the EPA are not their friends. We desperately need a business friendly administration to take the out of control, regulatory chains off that are killing our economy and future prosperity..

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (4)

To: miraje who wrote (27747)8/22/2011 10:50:45 AM
From: mindmeld   of 40059
 
Nah, that honor goes to the Federal Reserve under Bernanke, second only to the US Treasury under Geithner.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: mindmeld who wrote (27748)8/22/2011 11:06:07 AM
From: Eric   of 40059
 
Large Zone Near Japanese Reactors to Be Off Limits

TOKYO — Broad areas around the stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant could soon be declared uninhabitable, perhaps for decades, after a government survey found radioactive contamination that far exceeded safe levels, several major media outlets said Monday.

The formal announcement, expected from the government in coming days, would be the first official recognition that the March accident could force the long-term depopulation of communities near the plant, an eventuality that scientists and some officials have been warning about for months. Lawmakers said over the weekend — and major newspapers reported Monday — that Prime Minister Naoto Kan was planning to visit Fukushima Prefecture, where the plant is, as early as Saturday to break the news directly to residents. The affected communities are all within 12 miles of the plant, an area that was evacuated immediately after the accident. The government is expected to tell many of these residents that they will not be permitted to return to their homes for an indefinite period. It will also begin drawing up plans for compensating them by, among other things, renting their now uninhabitable land. While it is unclear if the government would specify how long these living restrictions would remain in place, news reports indicated it could be decades. That has been the case for areas around the Chernobyl plant in Ukraine after its 1986 accident.

Since the Fukushima accident, evacuations have been a sensitive topic for the government, which has been criticized for being slow to admit the extent of the disaster and trying to limit the size of the areas affected, despite possible risks to public health. Until now, Tokyo had been saying it would lift the current evacuation orders for most areas around the plant early next year, when workers are expected to stabilize Fukushima Daiichi’s damaged nuclear reactors.

The government was apparently forced to alter its plans after the survey by the Ministry of Science and Education, released over the weekend, which showed even higher than expected radiation levels within the 12-mile evacuation zone around the plant. The most heavily contaminated spot was in the town of Okuma about two miles southwest of the plant, where someone living for a year would be exposed to 508.1 millisieverts of radiation — far above the level of 20 millesieverts per year that the government considers safe.

The survey found radiation above the safe level at three dozen spots up to 12 miles from the plant. That has called into question how many residents will actually be able to return to their homes even after the plant is stabilized.

Some 80,000 people were evacuated from communities around the plant, which was crippled by the magnitude 9.0 earthquake and towering tsunami on March 11. Many of those residents now live in temporary housing or makeshift refugee shelters, and are allowed back to their homes only for brief, tightly supervised visits in which they must wear protective clothing.

nytimes.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: mindmeld who wrote (27746)8/22/2011 12:17:32 PM
From: teevee   of 40059
 
Further contraction would only take unemployment up to the 25% range. How can that be beneficial? North
America needs to expand and replace aging infrastructure to accommodate 3-5 decades of economic expansion, which is THE bedrock of an economy. The time to do it is when interest rates are low for a protracted period of time, making bonds that fund such economic renewal attractive. That time is NOW.....just watch for an Obama jobs program tied to infrastructure investments, and timed for the next election.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: teevee who wrote (27750)8/22/2011 1:29:34 PM
From: mindmeld   of 40059
 
Listen. Bernanke can keep rates low FOREVER. All he has to do is print money to buy ever Treasury bond that's every issued. That's what QEx was all about. But do you think that is healthy over the long run? It's not. And do you think that driving rates down artificially like this so that we can spend more money on infrastructure is healthy? I say, "Hell no!" You want for the US to be Japan? Well, it's already well underway. Just remember that Japan's stock market has lost 75% of its value in the last two decades. That doesn't sound like success to me. If they had bankrupted their insolvent banks and taken their medicine, then that could have been avoided. We're learning the lessons of Japan and we're doing exactly what they did. How stupid is that?

This is the problem with Keynesianism, it forces people to take extraordinary measures to whack the latest mole, instead of letting the free market and it's price discovery mechanisms to all the hard work for you.

The real interest rates on our Treasury bonds should be MUCH higher, but they are being manipulated. If all asset classes were at the unmanipulated equilibria they should be at, then Congress could focus on putting up a bill to fix infrastructure, price it out correctly, and then decide whether that was a priority over all the other priorities. If they chose priorities wrong, then the people would kick them out of office.

Instead, based on gov't working the way you describe, our gov't is borrowing and printing to spend, keeping alive alot of walking-dead corporate zombies, and destroying our purchasing power. Our gov't manipulation of markets has got businesses and consumers so spooked that they aren't investing for the long run any more. The game has become wealth preservation. So that NECESSARILY results in a threat to GDP growth.

So your answer to all that is to create MORE uncertainty by increasing the size of gov't again??? You want to double down on the same policies that have caused this mess in the first place? It's just not logical.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: miraje who wrote (27747)8/22/2011 2:10:58 PM
From: Brumar89   of 40059
 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.