Strategies & Market Trends | The coming US dollar crisis


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Grandk who wrote (3032)12/20/2007 8:55:24 PM
From: Sawdusty1 Recommendation   of 52101
 
Well said. I neglected to address something in your previous post to me and that is the point I was trying to make was that everyone had opportunities a number of years back, whether it be factory work, whatever. Today you need a good education. There are many past leaders of industry with little education that could not even get a job today.

Of course I understand that telemarketing is on a roll. :-)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Giordano Bruno who wrote (3031)12/20/2007 9:04:28 PM
From: Grandk   of 52101
 
That is one of those actions speak louder than words things. "Hey, we support a strong dollar." All the while the USD tanks 30%.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: dybdahl who wrote (3015)12/21/2007 1:16:40 AM
From: RJA_   of 52101
 
Thanks for the insight, dybdahl...

One thing pointed out in an Ambrose-Prichard article in the Telegraph was that banks are in his opinion more fragile in the Euro currency area as there is not direct government backing (other than the ECB)... and therefore the 500 billion infusion...

Here is the quote:

The ECB cannot allow the risk of a "Northern Rock" in Europe because there is no European government to take charge. Any suggestion that German taxpayers might have to bail out a Club Med bank would be politically explosive, testing the viability of monetary union. This is why Frankfurt has been most willing to open the floodgates at each stage of the crisis.

from --

telegraph.co.uk 

Im not sure you would agree with him... based on your post.

Would you elaborate a bit?

Thanks!

RJA

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: RJA_ who wrote (3037)12/21/2007 2:10:42 AM
From: dybdahl1 Recommendation   of 52101
 
I'm not an economist, but the Northern Rock backing by the UK government really offended many Europeans, so I guess there is a point.

However, one thing that was learned in Europe, is that you cannot have an economic union without synchronizing politics. A deficit in one country that could compare to the one in USA is unrealistic. And what destabilizes a currency most - USA's trade deficit, or Europe's lack of government backing of banks? If there is a huge problem threatening society, governments will intervene anyway.

As teenager, I moved to a country that had a huge trade deficit, almost as big as USA's (in relation to BNP), and I didn't expect the country to be debt-free in my life-time. This was depressing - all other countries were growing and having fun while we were producing stuff for them, and trying to avoid consuming ourselves. First we sent a part of our home owners into bankruptcy and increased taxes in order to reduce consumption. Then we created a very stable economic policy which increased trust in our governments and lowered our rates, and then we found oil. This way, it only took 30 years to get rid of the debt, which is impressive. I'm not sure that USA can solve its problem in 30 years.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Sawdusty who wrote (3028)12/21/2007 9:49:36 AM
From: Tommaso   of 52101
 
>>>Perhaps I have too narrow a focus, but I do not see a good immediate future for those that follow. <<<

Especially those who have neglected their school work so that they cannot think or write clearly, who carry an economic chip on their shoulders, and who consider themselves entitled to a paycheck that they do not deserve, and who parade their resentment. I would not give anyone like that a job.

Actually my own outlook is somewhat more cheerful. I meet plenty of hard-working young people who are cheerful and good at what they are doing. I do think it's too bad that our current government is deliberately debasing the value of the dollar. That's very demoralizing for anyone with instincts for saving.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Tommaso who wrote (3039)12/21/2007 10:37:49 AM
From: Sawdusty   of 52101
 
I think we share some similar views, although the people I was referring to do not fit that category. If they did, I would never have made comment.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: dybdahl who wrote (3038)12/21/2007 4:58:24 PM
From: RJA_   of 52101
 
>>As teenager, I moved to a country that had a huge trade deficit, almost as big as USA's (in relation to BNP), and I didn't expect the country to be debt-free in my life-time. This was depressing - all other countries were growing and having fun while we were producing stuff for them, and trying to avoid consuming ourselves. First we sent a part of our home owners into bankruptcy and increased taxes in order to reduce consumption. Then we created a very stable economic policy which increased trust in our governments and lowered our rates, and then we found oil. This way, it only took 30 years to get rid of the debt, which is impressive. I'm not sure that USA can solve its problem in 30 years.

Which country? You are in Denmark now... Oil is either Norway or GB?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Joe Sixer who wrote (2984)12/21/2007 7:49:27 PM
From: unclewest   of 52101
 
The DOD is not one of the departments that he wants to do away with. Defense is one of the Constitutional requirements of the Federal government, consequently it would not be on the list. In fact, his proposals would strengthen our defenses.

America has not won a war since DOD was created in 46.
And don't mistake some failed efforts 2-3 years prior.

DOD is moving towards 700,000 civilian employees. That is nearly 200,000 more than the US Army. There is something terribly wrong with that picture.

DOD is the losing branch of our armed forces.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (3034)12/21/2007 7:55:53 PM
From: Giordano Bruno1 Recommendation   of 52101
 
J.P. Morgan Chase: Bar Is Rising for Rate Cuts

In their weekly report on the global economy, J.P. Morgan Chase economists say the bar for Federal Reserve and European Central Bank easing is rising, even as the two central banks pump money into money markets to relieve unusual tensions.

The ECB, they say, “is not persuaded that the disruptive repricing of credit risk will have significant negative growth consequences. And it remains concerned about the rise in inflation now under way.” As for the Fed, they conclude, “the path ahead is uncertain.”

The Fed, they note, already has cut its key rate by a full percentage point, “prompted by concerns that the interaction of credit tightening and a housing downturn could produce a recession.” Fed officials now are “processing economic news pointing to a significant downshift into year end, one that looks likely to hold growth below trend for some months to come. However, the latest data do not suggest that the economy is sinking into recession. All of the key monthly indicators are well above recession-like levels and there is no evidence of a significant shift toward caution on the part of households or firms.”

All is not well, though, in the J.P. Morgan Chase crystal ball: “Reduced stress in money markets will not deliver a cure for financial markets, which are absorbing the pain of substantial credit losses and a contraction in the use of structured products. Indeed, corporate credit spreads have drifted wider in recent weeks and US jumbo mortgage rates have moved higher.”

J.P. Morgan Chase economists predicts a one-quarter point cut in the Fed’s key rate by March and then a one-half percentage point rate (ital) increase (end ital) by the end of 2008. It doesn’t anticipate any ECB rate moves in either direction. – David Wessel

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: unclewest who wrote (3042)12/21/2007 7:58:24 PM
From: Cactus Jack   of 52101
 
UW,

What are your thoughts about Ron Paul?

Just curious.

jpg

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.