Non-Tech | SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc.


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: DanDerr who wrote (1661)10/26/2011 1:08:42 PM
From: DanDerr   of 1680
 
A Clue: hockmir 1868 Posts on IHUB SLJB. Virtually all tout and pump the obvious scam and POS!

Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB) 10/25/2011 01:33:35 PM 1,868 Board

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: DanDerr who wrote (1661)10/26/2011 1:20:01 PM
From: Buckey   of 1680
 
There is a lot of that going around. The convenient memory loss of past touting. conveniently it is all there if one wants to dig back far enough.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Buckey who wrote (1663)10/26/2011 1:44:55 PM
From: DanDerr   of 1680
 
And IHUB Admins seem very intent on protecting Memory Loss. Just now, this was deletedas Off-Topic. The post is one of a series about the likes of hockmir and fernandez and Barton who were up to their ears in pumping SLJB. hockmir suddenly has amnesia, Fernandez is Indicted and Barton is off his rocker. And IHUB says discussing their involvement is off topic. Funny that attacking scambusters as bashers and paid by shorty is A-OK! But asking hockmir JUST WHY he was such a pumper/shill for SLJB (almost 2,000 posats all favorable and most full of crap and misinformation)!Fatt Matt is apparentlyt not forgotten...

-------------
Post Date: 10/26/2011 12:30:36 PM in reply to 68360532 by pro_se Board: Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd Reason: Off-Topic Well, it seems as of a few minutes ago, that a good way is to watch critical posts being removed from IHUB for a particularly scammy (PROVEN IN COURT) penny fraud. Seems exposing pumps, shills, and touts is against the TOU, but those defrauding INNOCENT INVESTORS ARE PROTECTED. Go figure! Read this quick...------------------------

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: DanDerr who wrote (1664)10/26/2011 1:53:49 PM
From: DanDerr   of 1680
 
Interesting activity by Fernandez on SLJB. And IHUB works hard to keep this from being discussed on it's SLJB Board. Things that make you go, Holy Schitt...

--------------------------------------------
Board Last Post Posts Paradigm Medical Industries Inc. (PDMI) 04/29/2009 01:16:21 PM 94 Metiscan Inc (MTIZ) 04/29/2009 11:20:10 AM 31 MOMO'S BREAKOUT BOARD 04/28/2009 01:09:18 PM 3 BB's Stock Haven 04/28/2009 01:07:43 PM 154 Monk's Den 04/28/2009 12:59:40 PM 3 GuruTrader's Investment Lair 04/23/2009 09:29:13 AM 21 Legends Food Corporation. (LJWY) 04/23/2009 09:17:54 AM 17 SARS Corp. (SARO) 04/20/2009 12:37:31 PM 6 Pinks Gone Wild (PAB) 04/14/2009 03:44:55 PM 2 Newron Sport (NSPT) 04/08/2009 10:34:56 AM 43 Bryn Resources Inc (BRYN) 03/23/2009 09:54:18 AM 39 WEALTH UNIVERSITY 03/11/2009 11:47:15 AM 1 PharmaCom BioVet Inc. (PHMB) 01/06/2009 11:31:41 AM 1 The Jailhouse (JAIL) 08/09/2007 10:10:21 PM 6 Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB) 07/30/2007 09:13:27 AM 3,014 Zenergy International Inc. (ZENG) 07/26/2007 09:37:11 AM 244 -*E-calls, Extreme undervalued plays, Etf''s - 07/24/2007 09:24:29 PM 68 InSystcom Inc. (ISYX) 07/18/2007 10:56:54 AM 43 PhoneBrasil International, Inc (PHBR) 07/10/2007 10:04:13 AM 6 Naturewell Inc. (NAWL) 07/08/2007 08:13:00 PM 18 DRAGONFLYPICKS (DFLY) 07/05/2007 11:33:43 AM 1 POW! Entertainment (POWN) 07/05/2007 08:11:21 AM 24 Southcorp Capital, Inc (STHC) 07/02/2007 02:37:10 PM 4 UNICO INCORPORATED (AZ) (UNCO) 06/21/2007 08:18:32 PM 4 $*LOTTO Project*STOCK$*NEW$*&*OPTION$*$ 06/19/2007 07:47:02 PM 1 Caveat Emptor 05/24/2007 03:44:26 PM 2 TEST (TEST) 03/29/2007 10:17:16 AM 1 CyberKey Solutions (CKYS) 12/21/2006 09:32:10 AM 159 Panamersa Corporation (PNMS) 12/12/2006 09:18:24 AM 134 Penny Scams 12/11/2006 12:16:17 PM 6 OTCBB ALERTS 11/21/2006 12:56:31 PM 2 MicroHoldings US, Inc (MCHU) 11/14/2006 11:40:53 AM 4 Algae Farm (USA), Inc. (ALGF) 11/14/2006 10:30:10 AM 5

----------------------------------------------

lol at the effort!!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: scion who wrote (1609)12/11/2011 9:00:46 PM
From: scion   of 1680
 
Re: 12/7/11 - [SLJB] Windsor Star: Sullivan trial told of nude beatings; 'Fear motivated everything I did'

Sullivan trial told of nude beatings

'Fear motivated everything I did'

BY DAVE BATTAGELLO, THE WINDSOR STAR DECEMBER 7, 2011
windsorstar.com 

The former bookkeeper for disbarred lawyer Scott Sullivan testified Tuesday her boss forced her to submit to beatings in the nude whenever she made a mistake at the office.

Kristine Robinson-Limanek said it was her lingering fear of Sullivan that made her deny earlier in the trial that she had sexual contact with her former boss.

After initially saying the two did not have a sexual relationship, RobinsonLimanek admitted to sexual acts with the former Windsor lawyer over several years.

If she messed up at work, Robinson-Limanek said Sullivan would take her back to her home, force her to strip and assault her "with a stick."

She wrote a letter to Superior Court Justice Thomas Carey and lawyers for both sides over the weekend which she read in court Tuesday. It was that letter which forced a one-day adjournment of the trial on Monday.

"(Sullivan) told me I owed him for everything," Robinson-Limanek read from her letter. "He beat me if I made a mistake at work. Fear motivated everything I did. I found myself paralyzed by fear. I've decided today is stick-up-for-me day. I should have done it a long time ago. You can't hurt me anymore, Scott."

Robinson-Limanek is a key Crown witness as the primary employee and bookkeeper who worked several years for Sullivan. Sullivan is alleged to have diverted thousands of dollars from his firm's accounts for his private use and bilked a number of clients out of hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Sullivan was a prominent local real estate and corporate lawyer who has pleaded not guilty to 10 counts of fraud, forging documents and breach of trust for the alleged improper handling of about $300,000 of clients' money.

The Law Society of Upper Canada disbarred Sullivan in May for allegedly misappropriating more than $1 million of his clients' money.

Sullivan's lawyer Dan Scott was set to introduce further evidence of the sexual history between Sullivan and Robinson-Limanek when the judge cut him off, questioning its relevance.

Scott indicated he highlighted the sexual relationship in court to detail the witness's lack of credibility because she denied romantic links with Sullivan during a law society hearing two years ago and initially during the current trial.

Scott agreed to move on and the remainder of the day his questions focused on Robinson-Limanek's financial struggles over the years, her difficulties keeping track of the firm's funds because of little accounting training and using a company credit card for personal use on dozens of occasions at such places as Zehrs, Wal-Mart, local restaurants or gas stations.

Robinson-Limanek was the only employee at the law firm who had a company credit card, she testified.

Earlier in the trial, Scott pointed to the firm's financial records which showed Robinson-Limanek also received at least $4,000 in loans from Sullivan over a period of a few years when her husband was unemployed. The bookkeeper tracked the loans with promissory notes she kept in her desk drawer and repaid in cash, she testified.

She testified earlier that Sullivan provided her with more than $30,000 for three years of law school and textbooks. She never repaid the funds, believing it could have been paid back through work once she was called to the bar and working as a lawyer for the firm.

She is employed today as an instructor and administrator for a paralegal training centre.

Robinson-Limanek ran unsuccessfully for the Progressive Conservative party during the 2007 provincial election under her maiden name, Kristine Robinson. She ran in the Windsor-Tecumseh riding against Liberal Finance Minister Dwight Duncan. Sullivan was a local Conservative party supporter during that time.

Robinson-Limanek also testified Tuesday that Sullivan did not monitor her work handling the firm's finances. Her work included preparing paperwork for real estate transactions and handling 100 to 300 cheques per month. She also told the court she received the firm's monthly bank statements.

Scott asked Robinson-Limanek if she ever had any memory of taking a bank statement to Sullivan with concerns on any issue.

"No I did not," Robinson-Limanek responded.

The trial is expected to continue today with testimony from Sullivan's alleged victims.

© Copyright (c) The Windsor Star

windsorstar.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: scion who wrote (1666)12/11/2011 9:01:38 PM
From: scion   of 1680
 
Re: 12/10/11 - [SLJB] Windsor Star: Disbarred lawyer blames bookkeeper; Accused denies violence, but confirms affair

Disbarred lawyer blames bookkeeper Accused denies violence, but confirms affair

BY BRIAN CROSS, THE WINDSOR STAR DECEMBER 10, 2011
windsorstar.com 

Disbarred lawyer Scott Sullivan laid much of the blame for money wrongly taken from his firm's accounts on the bookkeeper who last week testified he forced her to submit to beatings in the nude.

Testifying Friday at his fraud trial - where prosectors are asserting he diverted money for his own use and bilked clients of hundreds of thousands of dollars - the former real estate lawyer said there was no physical violence between he and Kristine Robinson-Limanek.

Robinson-Limanek testified Tuesday that when she messed up at work, Sullivan would take her to her home, force her to strip and assault her with a stick. She said she was paralyzed by her fear of her former boss.

"Did (Robinson-Limanek) ever appear to be paralyzed with fear," Sullivan's lawyer Dan Scott asked.

Sullivan quickly answered "No," before Scott could continue, "while she worked for you?"

"No," Sullivan, 43, repeated. He did confirm they had a sexual relationship that lasted from 2000 to 2007, while both were married. Their trysts happened in the office and at home, he said. "I don't think there was a set pattern."

He said he "terminated" the relationship in 2007, about a year before allegations began surfacing of missing money and the Law Society started investigating in April 2008.

Robinson-Limanek ran the real estate portion of his law practice, said Sullivan. He said he twice loaned her money, loaned her $27,969 to pay for law school and gave her a company credit card. When asked if the end of their affair soured their working relationship, Sullivan said he didn't believe so at the time.

Earlier in the trial, Sullivan's former partner Daniel Bornais testified that Robinson-Limanek did a poor job keeping the law firm's books, with little explanation for some entries and little accounting of frequent cheques Sullivan wrote to himself from general and trust accounts.

Scott went over a number of processed cheques and had Sullivan explain them. Some were issued from an inactive company to employees at the request of the client, Sullivan said. Some were made out to a firm employee in handwriting that's "not mine," according to Sullivan. One $1,150 cheque was written to Robinson-Limanek's husband. Robinson-Limanek had explained to him the money was for parking signs outside the firm's Shepherd Street office, though Sullivan said he had no memory of the husband doing any work there.

There was also a $3,157.44 cheque to help pay Robinson-Limanek's campaign expenses when she ran for the Conservatives in the 2007 provincial election in Windsor-Tecumseh. Sullivan, a former president of the riding association, said he did not donate to her campaign.

Sullivan testified how it was common, when he was going to be away, to sign a number of blank cheques to leave with Robinson-Limanek to cover expenses. "As needed, I would just sign a stack of them," he said.

Robinson-Limanek became Sullivan's assistant starting in 1996 and moved with him when he started his own firm in 1999. When his bookkeeper left, Robinson-Limanek offered to do the job to earn extra money, he said.

"She was under financial distress. Her husband was either not employed or under-employed, it seemed like most of the time."

He said for the first few months he monitored how she was faring with the books. After that, he was "not very supervisory," he said.

"It just wasn't something I did. If you ask me now, was it necessary, well, I guess it was, but it just didn't enter my mind."

Sullivan has pleaded not guilty to 10 counts of fraud, forging documents and breach of trust for his alleged mishandling of about $300,000 of clients' money. His testimony continues Monday.

© Copyright (c) The Windsor Star

windsorstar.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: scion who wrote (1666)12/11/2011 9:06:36 PM
From: Buckey   of 1680
 
That sounds beyond bizarre - I Do not find it plausible. Come on this sounds like some sort of consenual stuff

her boss forced her to submit to beatings in the nude whenever she made a mistake at the office.
///
If she messed up at work, Robinson-Limanek said Sullivan would take her back to her home, force her to strip and assault her "with a stick."

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Buckey who wrote (1668)12/11/2011 9:17:49 PM
From: scion   of 1680
 
Ms. Robinson-Limanek ran for the Progressive Conservative party during the 2007 provincial election under her maiden name, Kristine Robinson. She lost the race in the Windsor-Tecumseh riding to Liberal Finance Minister Dwight Duncan.

Kristine Robinson-Limanek

windsorstar.com 

Kristine Robinson-Limanek , of the City of Windsor. The Applicant applied to the Hearing Panel for a Class L1 licence.

By Decision and Order dated April 20, 2009, the Hearing Panel ordered as follows:
The Law Society shall issue to the Applicant a Class L1 licence.
There shall be no costs of this application.

(Counsel for the Society, Susan Heakes / Counsel for the Applicant, David McNevin)

lsuc.on.ca 

Lawyer allegedly beat his bookkeeper

Dave Battagello, Postmedia News · Dec. 7, 2011 | Last Updated: Dec. 7, 2011 5:13 AM ET
nationalpost.com 

Windsor . The former bookkeeper for a disbarred Windsor lawyer testified Tuesday her boss forced her to submit to beatings in the nude whenever she made a mistake at the office.

Kristine Robinson-Limanek, who once ran in a provincial election in a riding won by Ontario's Finance Minister, said it was her lingering fear of Scott Sullivan that made her deny earlier at his fraud trial that she had sexual contact with him.

If she messed up at work, she said Mr. Sullivan would take her back to her home, force her to strip and assault her "with a stick."

She wrote a letter to Superior Court Justice Thomas Carey and lawyers for both sides over the weekend, which she read aloud in court Tuesday.

"[Mr. Sullivan] told me I owed him for everything," Ms. Robinson-Limanek read. "He beat me if I made a mistake at work. Fear motivated everything I did. I found myself paralyzed by fear."

Ms. Robinson-Limanek is a key Crown witness as the bookkeeper who worked for several years for the prominent real estate and corporate lawyer.

Mr. Sullivan is alleged to have diverted thousands of dollars from his firm's accounts for his private use and to have bilked a number of clients.

He has pleaded not guilty to 10 counts of fraud, document forgery and breach of trust for the alleged improper handling of about $300,000 of clients' money.

The Law Society of Upper Canada disbarred Mr. Sullivan in May for allegedly misappropriating more than $1-million of his clients' money.

Ms. Robinson-Limanek ran for the Progressive Conservative party during the 2007 provincial election under her maiden name, Kristine Robinson. She lost the race in the Windsor-Tecumseh riding to Liberal Finance Minister Dwight Duncan.

nationalpost.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: scion who wrote (1669)12/11/2011 9:51:36 PM
From: Buckey   of 1680
 
Sorry I dont buy it. I know women get abused and theer are lots of freaks out there,

And yes he may be a sleaze ball BUT I just think there is another side to this story. THis sounds like years of consensual kinky sex. She is trong enough a woman to run for office but cannot stop years of spankings? HUM<MM

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Buckey who wrote (1670)12/12/2011 1:56:33 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell   of 1680
 
This sounds like years of consensual kinky sex.

Well, for her sake, I hope it was. In politics, when the goal is to get your name out there, no publicity is bad publicity. I bet she runs for office again, next chance she gets. Watch.



Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.