Strategies & Market Trends | Contrarian Investing


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Return to Sender who wrote (183)9/16/2006 5:45:03 PM
From: jsabelko   of 3902
 
RtS, thanks for the reply and your insights. I've never been much of a technical trader but I'm trying to learn. The link also looks useful for me so thanks. Are you a purely technical trader or mix technical and fundamentals?

joby

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: jsabelko who wrote (185)9/16/2006 5:54:09 PM
From: Return to Sender   of 3902
 
I pay attention to everything. I am primarily a contrarian investor who follows technical analysis, market breadth analysis, sentiment analysis, market cycle analysis and fundamental analysis.

What I look for is opportunities to make money by buying when markets are oversold and selling when they are overbought supported by my analysis of all of the above.

RtS

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Return to Sender who wrote (186)9/16/2006 6:12:14 PM
From: jsabelko   of 3902
 
RtS, so can i ask what you are buying now? What do you think of the oil service companies? I've typically steered clear of oil and gas related stocks as too many things out of my control (politics, commodity traders, weather etc..), but oil service is starting to look so attractive to me particularly North America natural gas service where political instability is at least less.

thanks,
joby

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: jsabelko who wrote (184)9/16/2006 6:29:47 PM
From: gcrispin   of 3902
 
Hi Joby,

"Key to me is is this temporary and how long."

I would respectfully suggest that the US excessive expenditures that is impacting the company will not be temporary. Certainly the stock could bounce after such a dramatic fall. But usually profit warnings for tech stocks don't stop with the first press release.

The following post outlines stocks that I still hold.

Message 22604333

Of those I think IMOS is the most interesting at its price to earnings ratio. If you are interested you should listen to the latest CC, particularly the Q&A which is a discussion as to why the stock is so cheap.

BEL is a complete mess, as their business unexpectedly fell out of bed over the summer. However, they have new management with a significant ownership position, so I am continuing to hold my stock.

You also might be interested in CKSW, another software company. I have previously posted about the company and bruin and I have exchanged views on their financials. These posts could be found by using a symbol search of the public messages.

My other positions don't really fall into the contrarian/value category.

I didn't include UNT but was aware of them. I will listen to their latest investor presentation as well as look at the stock you mentioned.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: gcrispin who wrote (182)9/16/2006 6:44:42 PM
From: bruwin   of 3902
 
Hi gcrispin ... nice to see you visiting this Board.
Seeing as you ask about PTEN ...
I agree that PTEN has pretty good fundamentals. The only slight negative I could find was a modest fall off in the percentage growth of PTEN’s EPS in its latest Quarterly, but that’s not too serious.
I’m rather puzzled to see the 40% fall in its price since Jan.’06. At a current P/E of 7 it doesn’t look expensive relative to its sector companies.

Needless to say, my comments are based on what I see in the Financial Statements. I haven’t gone into PTEN’s history or latest news etc.., so I’d be interested to read what you, or others, believe caused its recent fall in price.

If we look back to January this year, PTEN’s price was about $38 and its EPS was about $2.20. That gave a P/E of 17.3 which was probably considered high for companies in PTEN’s line of business. Possibly that initiated the fall in price.
If that was the case, then PTEN may be a good buy at its current P/E.

bruwin.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: gcrispin who wrote (182)9/16/2006 6:48:21 PM
From: E_K_S   of 3902
 
Hi gcrispin

Capitulated Volume some more examples -

One of the best contrarian plays is finding companies that have fallen significantly with waves of huge volume sells, then patiently accumulating shares waiting for the eventual recovery. The key is to determine that a lower low was achieved on lower volume. This signals that everybody has thrown in the towel and some type of recovery will begin. The recovery generally takes several months (18 months is typical) (and even a few years) but IF the company survives, it is usually stronger w/ new management.

If one is patient, you can make a multi-bagger.

Here are a few examples I have invested in and continue to own.

GLW (Corning) finance.yahoo.com 
GLW peaked in 2000 trading at over $100 but was caught in the "Dot.com" implosion. The company invested billions of dollars in their telecommunication fiber optic division only to see their investment go sour. It almost brought the company to bankruptcy and traded as low as $3.50/share in November of 2002. My first buy was at $12.00/share and continued buying down to $4.50/share. I continue to like the company and am holding my shares but will begin to peel off some shares as the stock breaks $30.00.

HAL (HALLIBURTON CO) (http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=HAL&t=5y&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=)
The company had a judgment against them for asbestos liabilities from one of their subsidiary companies in late 2001. After the climax selling occurred, I looked for the lower low on lower volume and purchased a significant chunk of shares around $9.00 (pre split). It took management around a year to resolve their asbestos problem writing off all potential litigation liabilities and forming a separate Trust company to handle all of the class-action payments. The stock only began to trade to all time highs after the litigation was monitized and written off which was finally resolved in 2004. I sold 90% of my shares but still hold shares that have a market value equivalent to my original purchase in 2001. This was a ten bagger!

EP (EL PASO CORPORATION)
finance.yahoo.com 

This was a classic example of a company that had valuable assets but also huge amounts of leveraged debt. The company got caught up in a bubble valuation in their industry and leveraged their company buying up new expensive assets. There were waves of selling as the industry adjusted the valuation(s) and the fear of Enron was in the news. The stock tumbled from $60 to a low of $3.00. I began accumulating shares in February 2003 and March 2003 as the stock hit lower lows on lower volume. All investors lost faith in the company's management as the market was selling shares for pennies on the dollar. I started to buy shares at $7.00, with my lowest chunk around $3.00. The company continued to pay their dividend as they worked to unwind and sell assets to pay down their debt.

I continue to hold my shares and now after three years, their balance sheet is in much better condition and their core assets they were able to control include valuable natural gas reserves and interests in pipe line distribution partnerships.

================================================================

My most recent BUY is in WON (Westwood One)http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=WON&t=2y&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=

The company is in a restructuring mode as their revenue growth has stalled for various reasons. They have brought in a new CEO and have a few quarters behind them that include new capital investments in new business segments (Internet & Mobile services) and the downsizing of their labor integrating new technology to reduce expenses.

I have been accumulating shares at $9 and now more in the $6-$7 range but am focused on two specific events. First, two very large investors (w/ 7% & 12% ownership interests) have finally sold off their ownership interests leaving CBS as the only major (10% or greater) stockholder. These sales accounted for the large volume spikes and significant price drop in 2006. I believe capitulation has or will occur soon. Look for a lower low on lower volume.

Second, I am waiting for the final quarter of write downs (perhaps it occurred last quarter) where management throws in the sink. The company continues to have excellent free flow cash flow even with the reduction in revenues. Management has used this revenue stream to finance new capital investments and they continue to pay their dividend (now around 5.6%).

I expect that once their new capital investments begin to generate new revenue streams and management has trimmed expenses to be in line with current revenue, WON should be able to grow again but at a bit slower rate than in the past. Fair value s/b around $25-$30 in 18 months. The other option would be for CBS (the last major large shareholder) to buy out WON and integrate it into the current CBS operation. They would only do this if they can buy the company on the cheap (perhaps $12-$15/share).
===================================================================

I tend to get my ideas from the new lows list, stocks making yearly lows and my best group are stocks making five year lows.

EKS

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: gcrispin who wrote (188)9/16/2006 7:50:12 PM
From: jsabelko   of 3902
 
gcrispin,

Agreed. Question for me is that regardless of the conflicts if this year various agencies overspent in support of the war efforts and were forced to delay otherwise intended purchases from ezen then these agencies could still spend for planned purchases at beginning of next year's budget and there may be pent up demand. Regardless, it's all speculation at this point. Thanks.

I do like imos and have reviewed their latest presentations. If I'm looking at their financials correctly there are a couple items that make them not quite as ridiculously undervalued as they appear at first glance: 1/3 minority interest, extraordinary gain last quarter 9 million. Still even considering this they do appear undervalued and I thank you for bringing it to my attention.

joby

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Bridge Player who wrote (91)9/16/2006 8:14:18 PM
From: Bill Wexler   of 3902
 
<<Wexler is a noted shorter>>

Thanks! Results speak for themselves.

<<and basher>>

Incorrect. I am simply referred to as a "basher" by promoters and insiders of scam companies that are engaged in stock swindles. Pointing out facts does not make one a basher.

<<I think HSOA is an interesting company>>

Boy...you can say that again.

<<and potentially a good investment>>

Unlikely, since the company management is engaged in numerous questionable and incestuous transactions...not to mention stock "pump and dumps".

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: gcrispin who wrote (182)9/16/2006 9:20:23 PM
From: pcyhuang   of 3902
 
grispin:

I think you would like our model of selecting timely contrarian invstment, value + capitulated volume.

Your choice of PTEN comes close, may be just a bit early.

Insiders have liquidated $143,500,536 worth of stock since March. Our model would like to see insider's have begun to replenish their positions.

pcyhuang

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: jsabelko who wrote (175)9/16/2006 9:45:57 PM
From: pcyhuang   of 3902
 
When to sell

For investment in sectors, I typically would buy the sector when all stocks' SAR are pointing downward and William%R are at an oversold level. I would hold all stocks in the sector until the portfolio as a whole has earned a decent percentage.

In individual equity, I would sell when the fundamentals have deteriorated substantially. Or if the stock has advanced a great deal, I would use trailing stops, as a percentage of market price to exit.

pcyhuang

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.