Non-Tech | Kirk's Market Thoughts


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (77)8/23/2010 10:49:07 AM
From: Kirk ©   of 210
 
>>Do you expect the typical selling in September this year?

Probably. If not, then what I own will make me happy. If the market goes lower, then I'll buy more shares. It is never all or nothing for me with asset allocation to equities.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Kirk © who wrote (80)8/23/2010 10:55:56 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™   of 210
 
Good point, you're right...<g>

GZ

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (81)8/23/2010 12:36:28 PM
From: Kirk ©   of 210
 
Harper Petersen Shipping Index

Here is another index to watch
harperpetersen.com 
and
harperpetersen.com 

It might be interesting to see how global shipping rates align with ECRI's WLI or the stock markets, but I've not yet found the raw data for the charts.


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (81)4/24/2012 11:00:53 AM
From: Kirk ©1 Recommendation   of 210
 
In the sad but true file.....




Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Kirk © who wrote (83)4/24/2012 11:03:45 AM
From: Kirk ©   of 210
 
Articles and Charts

April 20 ECRI's Economic Indicators Move Lower
April 16 ECRI's WLI Growth Rate At 35-Week High, Despite Lower WLI Level
April 12 U.S. Borrows 53.7 Cents Of Every Dollar Spent In March
April 12 Apple's Valuation Is Good, But Are The Assumptions Correct?
April 9 ECRI's WLI Rises To 34-Week High, Growth Rate Now Positive


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Kirk © who wrote (83)4/24/2012 11:56:20 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™   of 210
 
I fully agree...

GZ

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Investor2 who wrote (78)5/3/2012 11:18:14 AM
From: Kirk ©   of 210
 
My Defense of ECRI on another board.
readmsg.aspx?msgid=28122126
Feel free to share it with others.
===========================================================================

"Personally I don't think there's any point in thinking up reasons or excuses for them, they were simply dead wrong and made a terrible call that was was very damaging to those who believed in them."

Actually, I disagree. I follow their indicators VERY CLOSELY and am friends with Lakshman.

Look at my chart of WLI vs GDP at ECRI's WLI Moves Higher; Q1 GDP Positive Due To Deficit Spending

It peaked early last year and they predicted a slowdown about a year ago near the top in 2011 BEFORE a 22% bear market. See: Two Bear Markets Missed in Half a Decade for my calculation and graph showing we just exited a 2011 bear market.

Check out the chart here
  • June 3, 2011 " ECRI's Weekly Leading Index Falls Again; Economy to Slow Further in Coming Months"
  • This is where they predicted a slowdown... the S&P was near its 2011 highs...

    My own personal and professional portfolios are within spitting distance of RECORD ALL TIME HIGHS. (They hit all time highs before the recent pullback.)

    I can't say using ECRI data has hurt me at all and I think it has helped me avoid the sharks telling people to be fully invested at the tops who had no ammo to buy the declines.

    BTW, just because the statistics don't show high unemployment, the phrase is "you haven't seen nothing yet" is correct if you look at

    -> how many college graduates are moving back in with parents because they can't find jobs, how
    -> how many workers in their 40s and 50s were let go and replaced by younger, cheaper to insure and willing to work at 1/3 lower pay at one of the largest employers in the country... BANKS!
    -> how many illegals have left CA or stopped coming here since there is no work.
    -> how many kids don't even graduate high school... not sure if they ever enter the work force. It is a national disgrace, even if a good percentage are here only because their parents are illegals who came her to have kids to get a free education.

    Without massive deficit spending to be paid by the generations that will follow us... we'd be in a depression U.S. Borrows 53.7 Cents Of Every Dollar Spent In March

    So... maybe YOU took a look at their great record of success at the wrong time and got too bearish on stocks MONTHS AFTER they predicted a slowdown? That is not what their advice is for. It is for institutions and people looking to start new businesses. I don't think last fall was a great time to start a new business... and the large companies are returning cash to shareholders rather than invest in jobs and growth as they agree with ECRI... so their share prices are going up but not due to great economic growth.

    Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

    To: Kirk © who wrote (86)5/5/2012 12:18:28 PM
    From: Investor2   of 210
     
    What do you think about this asset allocation model, given the current market climate and interest rates?

    Age

    Stocks vs. bonds/cash

    40

    80% stocks, 20% bonds/cash

    50

    70% stocks, 30% bonds/cash

    60

    60% stocks, 40% bonds/cash

    70

    40% stocks, 60% bonds/cash

    80+

    20% stocks, 80% bonds/cash



    What asset allocation do you think is appropriate at this time?



    Thanks,


    I2

    Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

    To: Investor2 who wrote (87)5/5/2012 1:53:13 PM
    From: Kirk ©   of 210
     
    I use 120 less your age so that is close for people less than 70.

    I'm not sure the old models and projections work as they were done with a 40 years of falling interest rates.

    Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

    To: Kirk © who wrote (88)5/5/2012 2:24:12 PM
    From: Investor2   of 210
     
    Re: " I'm not sure the old models and projections work as they were done with a 40 years of falling interest rates."

    I have the same thought. Are bonds really less risky than stocks, with interest rates at historic lows?

    The "120 - your age" rule is close to my current asset allocation; I'm probably slightly more weighted toward stocks, although I haven't computed it precisely recently. With all of the world's problems and with the S&P 500 at 1369 I'm debating lowering my stock allocation. But where to put the money.?.?

    Best wishes,

    I2

    Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)
    Previous 10 | Next 10 

    Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.