SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Strategies & Market Trends | Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp. - A Scam?


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: anniebonny5/12/2007 12:38:13 PM
   of 4611
 
Another Lee Webb's article May 10th


By: TheFraudStopper
10 May 2007, 11:43 AM EDT Msg. 1090 of 1094
Jump to msg. #  Go
Conversion Solutions CEO Harris cements cultish schism

Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp (U:CSHD)
Shares Issued 103,135,657
Thursday May 10 2007 - Street Wire

by Lee M. Webb

Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp.'s now uncontested leader Rufus Paul Harris, who recently filed a belated response to a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawsuit launched more than six months ago, has managed to cement a schism in the derailed promotion's cult-like following since he resurfaced to press his claim to the title of chief executive officer in January.

As previously reported by Stockwatch, the SEC filed a civil suit against Conversion and Mr. Harris in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on Oct. 24, 2006.

Among other things, the U.S. regulator alleges that Conversion's outrageous claims about owning billions of dollars worth of bonds are rubbish. The SEC wants Mr. Harris banned from serving as an officer or director of any public company.

Notwithstanding the seriousness of the allegations, no attorney has filed even so much as an appearance for Mr. Harris or the purported multibillion-dollar company now wallowing on the grey market after being ignominiously booted from the OTC Bulletin Board.

On April 24, five months after the SEC obtained entries of default against Conversion and Mr. Harris for failing to file timely responses to the complaint, the Georgia promoter submitted a sloppy answer to the lawsuit.

Mr. Harris's muddled and belated response dismays some disillusioned shareholders, not least because the sloppy filing bears no evidence of having been prepared or even reviewed by an attorney.

However, many of Conversion's cultish Internet followers who congregate on a chat forum opened Mr. Harris do not share that disaffection with the Georgia promoter.

Indeed, according to the assessment of many gullible Conversion shareholders who regularly proclaim their complete faith in the company's leader, the crafty Mr. Harris has led the SEC and a number of market miscreants into a clever trap and has them right where he wants them.

In this second article in a series that will culminate in a closer examination of Mr. Harris's unlawyered response to the SEC lawsuit, Stockwatch will review some of the developments as the Georgia promoter reasserted his claim to being Conversion's legitimate leader.
The return

As noted in previous Stockwatch articles, while Mr. Harris did not dispute his first ouster at the hands of Conversion's major shareholder Michael Alexander last November, he was not so accepting when he was tossed again.

Indeed, Mr. Harris was clearly miffed when he was given the boot for the second time that month in favour of Vancouver promoter and Internet tout John Arlitt, again on the strength of Mr. Alexander's purported controlling share position.

Within a couple of days of his second ouster on Nov. 28, 2006, Mr. Harris made one of his evening appearances on SubPennyRadio.com, an obscure Internet radio stock talk program.

Sounding more than a little petulant, Mr. Harris questioned the legality of his second sacking, hinted at some peculiar conspiracy involving the company's transfer agent, generally bemoaned his treatment and pouted that any assistance he provided the company in the future would be costly.

For a time, Mr. Harris refused to relinquish control of Conversion's website, but evidently he relented early last December and some changes were made to the site, including the identification of Mr. Arlitt as the company's chief executive officer.

After the comical tussle over the website, and with support for the semi-literate Georgia promoter quickly waning among Conversion's gullible Internet followers, Mr. Harris seemed to abandon the fray and faded from view.

After a noticeable absence through much of December and early January, however, Mr. Harris resurfaced on Jan. 17 to press his claim to the title of Conversion's chief executive officer.

Mr. Harris later claimed that he had taken a break to spend time with his family, particularly through the Christmas holiday season.

Before he reappeared on Jan. 17, however, it was learned that a significant portion of Mr. Harris's absence was involuntary inasmuch as he was in a Georgia jail.

According to a report from the Bartow county sheriff's office, Mr. Harris was arrested on a probation violation on Jan. 1.

Mr. Harris spent the next 16 days in the Bartow county slammer, getting out of jail before an encore appearance on SubPennyRadio.com on Jan. 17.

According to Mr. Harris's SubPennyRadio account of how he ended up in the pokey, he was arrested while attempting to break up a New Year's Eve bar fight. The probation violation, he said, was related to a previous driving under the influence charge.

While some Internet followers suggested that it was more than just a bit unseemly for the head of a purported multibillion-dollar company to spend more than two weeks in a county jail and expressed reservations about Mr. Harris's association with Conversion, others were prepared to dismiss the whole affair as a peccadillo and welcomed the return of the Georgia promoter.

Over the following weeks, a widening rift developed between opposing factions within Conversion's cult-like following.
The schism

During his first SubPennyRadio appearance after getting out of jail, Mr. Harris wasted no time in renewing his claim to being Conversion's rightful chief executive officer.

The Georgia promoter insisted that Mr. Alexander's preferred shares, which purportedly underpinned Mr. Harris's two ousters, had been cancelled under the terms of the merger agreement between the FrontHaul Group Inc. and Conversion that had been signed in July of 2006.

(Stockwatch will review a number of issues involving Mr. Alexander's share position in a separate article.)

Mr. Harris informed the host of SubPennyRadio that he was going to use the obscure radio program as his "voice," and he did just that over a number of subsequent interviews.

Among other SubPennyRadio pronouncements, Mr. Harris told his devoted followers that they would soon be receiving a 140-page proxy package.

That claim had many naive Conversion shareholders anxiously awaiting their daily mail delivery through the first few weeks of February, apparently unaware that any proxy material would first have to be filed with the SEC.

Like many of Mr. Harris's other promised developments, the proxy never materialized.

With the proxy promise wearing thin, the Georgia promoter instructed his devoted followers to keep an eye on PACER, an Internet service that provides electronic access to documents filed with most U.S. District Courts including the Georgia court with jurisdiction over the SEC lawsuit against Conversion and Mr. Harris.

Mr. Harris's followers faithfully followed his instructions, keeping vigil for weeks.

Strangely, the Georgia promoter later acknowledged in a SubPennyRadio interview that the company did not have a lawyer and he went on to claim that he did not intend to respond to the SEC action, causing some shareholders to scratch their heads over his repeated encouragement to watch PACER.

As Mr. Harris faced increasing challenges from Internet critics over his failure to address the SEC lawsuit, deliver on promises or provide any evidence of corporate progress, he opened his own chat forum on ProBoards.com, a free site that has been home to followers of a number of smelly promotions.

With the opening of his Conversion chat board in early February, Mr. Harris effectively cemented the schism that had developed among the company's cult-like followers as the Georgia promoter's devoted supporters flocked to the site and brooked no criticism of their leader.
The mission

Using SubPennyRadio and his Internet chat forum as platforms, Mr. Harris increasingly attempted to shift responsibility for Conversion's woes to naked short sellers, hedge funds, ineffective or collusive regulators and other bogeymen that provide popular scapegoats for many skunky promotions and their gullible followers.

The Georgia promoter has convinced many of his devoted acolytes that he is on a mission to overhaul the entire market system, bring a motley assortment of perceived market miscreants to justice and make Conversion's shareholders rich in the process.

To this point, Mr. Harris's grandiose mission for complete market reform and lofty plans for Conversion evidently do not include having legal counsel, a dedicated corporate office, employees or, for that matter, even a company telephone number.

Meanwhile, the pesky outstanding SEC lawsuit against Conversion and the Georgia promoter started to nag at even some of Mr. Harris's cultish followers.

On April 20, a Friday, Mr. Harris indicated to his chat site members that there would be a momentous development on Monday, April 23.

"I need to apologize to the shareholders of CSHD," Mr. Harris subsequently wrote in large, bold font in an April 20 message. "I fell asleep at my post for a few months.

"I applied too much FAITH in the system (SEC and DOJ) and prayed that they would come to our rescue quickly.

"I forgot the reason I started this battle 4 years ago and for this I must Apologize.

"To the GOVERNMENT BOYS that are reading this; Today is the beginning of a NEW ERA."

Mr. Harris had more to say on April 21.

"The time has come for the type of market manipulation that occurred with our stock to stop," Mr. Harris wrote. "Someone had to take a stand; even if we have 10 trillion in assets until the MM's (Market Manipulators) are stopped our corporation would never reach its true value with thousands of illegal shareholders in the market.

"Our company to them was just another day at the office, thousands of corporations are illegally traded each day, millions in illegal stock sold to innocent shareholders causing false market prices. Taking your hard earned money and then laughing and taunting it in your face by posting on message boards, internet talk shows, false press releases and Web sites.

"I do not care who is benefiting from this activity, even if it is political parties funding their activities, it is over, the hundred (sic) of millions of shares sold in our corporation was your down fall (sic).

"At the time of the merger the corporation only had 31 million shares that could trade legally, THE FLOAT, but yet that amount traded with in the first 3 days and has never stopped.

"We are coming for you, I do not care who you are or what your reasons were; Your trading activity in our stock was and is ILLEGAL.

"Shareholders it is now time, if you have copied or stored documentation concerning the activity; such as emails or post from suspicious indivisibles (sic), daily trading activity to include daily volumes Please forward it to HereWeCome@CSHD.US.

"I hope that all shareholders have learned how the markets are used to steal from the American people on a daily basis."

When there was no evidence of the anticipated momentous development by the afternoon of April 23, Mr. Harris finally informed his restive followers that he had submitted an answer to SEC complaint.

The answer, such as it is, finally appeared on PACER on April 25.

Stockwatch will examine Mr. Harris's muddled response to the SEC complaint in a following article.

Meanwhile, the Georgia promoter's touted beginning of a new era has not had any positive effect on the company's languishing share price.

With 503,700 shares changing hands, Conversion closed at two cents on May 9.

Comments regarding this article may be sent to lwebb@stockwatch.com.

(More information regarding Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp. is available in Stockwatch articles published on Oct. 13, 16, 18, 20, 24 and 26; Nov. 2, 3, 7, 10 and 16; Dec. 5, 7 and 11, 2006; and May 8, 2007.)

© 2007 Canjex Publishing Ltd.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: anniebonny5/12/2007 12:39:17 PM
   of 4611
 
And another Lee Webb article
Posted by: TheFraudStopper
In reply to: None

Date:5/11/2007 1:23:41 PM
Post #of 148287

Conversion Solutions ex-CEO's holdings draw questions
Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp (U:CSHD)
Shares Issued 103,135,657
Friday May 11 2007 - Street Wire
by Lee M. Webb
Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp. major shareholder and former chief executive officer Michael Alexander's extremely tardy insider disclosure regarding disposing of millions of shares raises questions about his role in twice ousting the company's now reinstalled leader Rufus Paul Harris last year.
As previously reported, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) suspended Conversion and followed up with a securities fraud lawsuit against the company and then chief executive officer Mr. Harris on Oct. 24, 2006.
In the wake of the SEC action, Mr. Harris was twice given the boot as chief executive officer in November on the purported strength of Mr. Alexander's control position.
At one time, Mr. Alexander reportedly controlled more than 78 per cent of the shares of Conversion's OTC Bulletin Board predecessor, the FrontHaul Group Inc., by virtue of a deal he inked with a public shell in August of 2004.
The sweetheart deal
On Aug. 26, 2004, Mr. Alexander's FrontHaul was acquired by an OTC-BB shell in exchange for 20 million common shares and 500,000 preferred shares convertible into an additional 50 million common shares.
The right to convert the 500,000 preferred shares into 50 million common shares was tied to a formula based on a very modest 12-month revenue schedule under which 25 per cent of the preferred stock could be converted if the company had $250,000 in revenue, 50 per cent for $500,000 in revenue and 100 per cent for $750,000 in revenue.
If the company failed to meet any or all of the revenue thresholds by the one-year anniversary date of the deal, it could either ante up 50 cents per share for the unconverted preferred shares or Mr. Alexander had the right to convert the whole amount into 50 million common shares.
As it turned out, the meagre revenue thresholds were not met, but the company did not redeem the shares, so Mr. Alexander had the right to convert the preferred shares to 50 million common shares as of Aug. 26, 2005.
In addition to the sweetheart share swap for his fledgling private company, once in control of the public company, Mr. Alexander inked a rather nifty employment agreement as chief executive officer that, among other things, provided that his stock ownership would never fall below 60 per cent of the company's issued and outstanding shares.
Alas, the OTC-BB outfit turned out to be a money-losing operation and approximately 15 months later Mr. Alexander steered the cash-strapped company into an onerous financing deal.
The toxic deal
Under Mr. Alexander's leadership, FrontHaul, which billed itself as a trucking brokerage and logistics company, set about bleeding red ink.
By Sept. 30, 2005, just over a year after Mr. Alexander took control, the company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $2.7-million, a working capital shortfall of approximately $256,000 and chump change of only $9,227 in cash. (All amounts are in U.S. dollars.)
In November of 2005, the haemorrhaging company hooked up with a coterie of financing outfits at least nominally led by Corey Ribotsky for a badly needed cash infusion.
Mr. Ribotsky is the frontman for AJW Partners LLC, AJW Qualified Partners LLC, AJW Offshore Ltd. and New Millennium Partners II LLC, which are quite active in providing toxic financing to floundering OTC-BB companies.
On Nov. 18, 2005, Mr. Alexander signed convertible debenture purchase agreements for an aggregate $2.5-million with Mr. Ribotsky's companies.
The convertible debentures were floorless, constituting what is commonly known as a death spiral financing.
Under the terms of the agreements, the toxic financiers advanced $1-million on Nov. 18, 2005, and another $750,000 on Dec. 23, 2005.
The remaining $750,000 was to be paid upon the acceptance of a registration statement covering approximately 50.4 million shares to be issued to the toxic financiers, but that never happened because FrontHaul almost immediately triggered a default provision in the agreements that made the $1.75-million already received immediately payable along with a penalty of $528,288.
In a March 28, 2006, SEC filing Mr. Alexander reported that FrontHaul intended to redeem the convertible notes, but there is nothing to indicate that the virtually penniless company ever managed to do that.
Oddly, while Mr. Ribotsky is not known for just walking away after handing over $1.75-million and, in fact, is not shy about suing companies that attempt to welsh on deals with his toxic financing outfits, there is nothing to indicate that he has taken any action against FrontHaul or its successor, Conversion.
Interestingly, the financing agreement with Mr. Ribotsky's companies called for Mr. Alexander to pledge more than 25 million of his shares and deliver them to the financiers along with an executed transfer form.
Given that Mr. Alexander changed the OTC-BB company's name to FrontHaul on April 13, 2006, by virtue of his reported control of more than 75.1 million shares representing more than 78 per cent of the company's stock, he apparently still had control of the 25 million shares pledged to the financiers at that time.
Indeed, setting aside Mr. Harris's recent disputed claim that Mr. Alexander's 500,000 preferred shares were cancelled under the terms of the July 2006 merger agreement between Conversion and FrontHaul, it was not until Jan. 16 of this year that shareholders received even a hint that Mr. Alexander did not still control 75.1 million shares.
Conflicting numbers
As mentioned in the first of this series of articles, Mr. Alexander made a series of posts about Conversion and Mr. Harris on HotStockMarket.com on Jan. 16.
During the course of the Jan. 16 Internet finger pointing at Mr. Harris and revelations regarding a criminal probe, Mr. Alexander made a number of claims that raise questions about his own conduct and apparent disregard for following disclosure requirements.
For example, Mr. Alexander claimed that his wife had sold 500,000 shares "when the merger first happened," but they both held all the rest of their shares as of the middle of January.
Interestingly, Mr. Alexander's wife, Paula L. Alexander, served a stint as an officer of Conversion's OTC-BB predecessor and filed a statement with the SEC in October of 2005 in which she disclaimed owning any shares at all.
There was no subsequent filing to disclose just how or when Ms. Alexander acquired her shares; nor was there any filing regarding her unloading 500,000 shares.
In one of his Jan. 16 posts, Mr. Alexander, who denied selling any stock at all, pegged his own holdings at 64.4 million shares.
"I started out with 14.4 million common and 500,000 pref (preferred shares) ... which converted to 50,000,000 (common shares) when I took the company back over," Mr. Alexander wrote.
Oddly, Mr. Alexander's tally of 64.4 million shares could not be reconciled with his April 13, 2006, SEC filing in which he claimed to control approximately 75.1 million shares, leaving a discrepancy of more than 10.7 million shares.
In other Jan. 16 posts, Mr. Alexander offered conflicting accounts of just when he purportedly converted his 500,000 preferred shares to 50 million common shares.
In one post, Mr. Alexander indicated that he had converted the shares prior to Oct. 16, 2006, which was the supposed date of record for Conversion's announced cockamamie scheme to distribute six additional shares for every share owned to the company's stockholders by the end of that month.
Mr. Harris did not bother to follow the proper procedures necessary to effect such an issuance of shares, so the goofy distribution never materialized.
In any event, after claiming that he had converted his preferred shares prior to the announced record date in order to qualify for the distribution, Mr. Alexander went on to claim in another post that the conversion took place when he "took the company back over," which occurred on Nov. 2, 2006.
Strangely, both of Mr. Alexander's conflicting claims regarding the date of the conversion were contradicted by a letter from the company's transfer agent stating that the preferred shares had not been converted as of Nov. 30, 2006.
Sudden recall
Perhaps Mr. Alexander's Jan. 16 Internet posts, or the pointed questions they provoked over the following days, tweaked his memory regarding some neglected and long overdue SEC filings.
On Jan. 31, Mr. Alexander filed a Form 4, statement of changes in beneficial ownership, with the SEC disclosing the acquisition of the 500,000 convertible preferred shares effective Dec. 30, 2004.
According to an explanatory note, the issuance of the preferred shares more than two years earlier had been "previously overlooked."
On Feb. 7, Mr. Alexander followed up with another delinquent Form 4 disclosing a number of other previously unreported and very peculiar transactions.
According to the Feb. 7 filing, Mr. Alexander disposed of more than 10.7 million shares valued at 12 cents per share by way of a gift or gifts to "various charity, non-affiliate entities and/or non-affiliates" on April 27, 2006.
On Aug. 18, 2006, Mr. Alexander disposed of 500,000 shares at a reported price of $1.12 per share in a transaction that he claims was executed by his wife.
On Sept. 23, 2006, the generous Mr. Alexander disposed of two million shares valued at $2.60 per share by way of a gift or gifts with a total value of $5.2-million.
On Jan. 17 of this year, contrary to his conflicting and contradicted Internet claims, Mr. Alexander reportedly converted his 500,000 preferred shares to 50 million common shares.
On the same day, Mr. Alexander reportedly gave away another 7.5 million shares.
On Jan. 25, the incredibly beneficent Mr. Alexander claims that he gifted a further 42.5 million shares.
To this point, the beneficiaries of Mr. Alexander's remarkable largesse, which accounts for the disposition of more than 62.7 million shares worth millions of dollars, remain unidentified.
In the wake of his staggering share give-away and other belatedly disclosed unloading of stock, and assuming that he has not overlooked any other transactions, Mr. Alexander reportedly now holds approximately 11.9 million shares.
In any event, quite apart from concerns about Mr. Alexander's apparently cavalier attitude with respect to reporting obligations and setting aside Mr. Harris's claim that the former FrontHaul leader's preferred shares were cancelled under the merger agreement, the belated disclosure that he did not even purportedly convert those shares until January of this year raise a number of other questions about the whole Conversion imbroglio.
The imbroglio
Conversion's corporate muddle may be far more convoluted than many of the company's Internet followers seem to realize.
In fact, while there has been considerable debate and controversy regarding Conversion's Keystone carousel of revolving chief executive officers since last November, the convoluted muddle traces at least as far back as April of 2006.
As remarked in an earlier article, preferred shares typically do not carry voting rights and there is nothing in any of Conversion's predecessor's SEC filings to indicate that Mr. Alexander's preferred FrontHaul shares had any voting privileges prior to conversion into common shares.
On April 13, 2006, however, Mr. Alexander filed an information statement with the SEC in which he reported that he was amending the OTC-BB company's Delaware certificate of incorporation and changing the corporate name to FrontHaul.
Under Delaware law, any such amendment had to be approved by shareholders holding at least a majority of the company's voting shares.
In the information statement, Mr. Alexander represented that he controlled more than 75.1 million voting shares comprising more than 78 per cent of the company's stock.
At the time, however, he had not converted his preferred shares into 50 million common shares and in the absence of any disclosure that the unconverted preferred shares carried special voting rights it is not at all clear that Mr. Alexander had the authority to amend the articles of incorporation.
While an improperly executed Delaware incorporation amendment may be a relatively small matter in the grand scheme of Conversion's corporate muddle, it may cast at least some doubt on subsequent events including the merger agreement with Mr. Harris's outfit just three months later.
In any case, questions have certainly been raised regarding Mr. Alexander's role in Conversion's comical chief executive officer switcheroos.
As it happens, those shenanigans are even murkier than many Conversion fans might suspect.
As previously reported by Stockwatch, at 3 a.m. on Nov. 2, 2006, a Conversion news release issued from the company's purported headquarters in Kennesaw, Ga., announced that the board of directors had removed Mr. Harris as chief executive officer.
It is important to note the board of directors that first claimed to oust Mr. Harris was made up of the Georgia promoter's associates who assumed their duties under the terms of the merger agreement with FrontHaul and was generally accepted as being legally constituted.
It is also worth noting that a board of directors has the power to appoint or dismiss a company's chief executive officer.
In the same news release announcing the board's decision to remove Mr. Harris, it was also reported that the board would announce his successor at a later time.
As it turned out, that never happened.
A scant 12 hours after the news release was issued in the wee hours of the morning from Kennesaw on behalf of Conversion's board of directors, Mr. Alexander issued another announcement from Lake Dallas, Tex.
According to Mr. Alexander's Nov. 2, 2006, afternoon news release, a special meeting of majority shareholders holding more than 51 per cent of the company's voting shares had given the boot to the existing board of directors and management and had installed him as Conversion's sole officer and director.
As previously reported, that development turned on Mr. Alexander's purported controlling interest.
Once again, however, it is not at all clear that Mr. Alexander had the necessary voting clout to effect the change in the board of directors, given that he had not converted his preferred shares.
Similar doubt is cast upon subsequent shenanigans as Mr. Alexander handed the company back to Mr. Harris on Nov. 14, 2006, and then gave him the boot again in favour of Vancouver promoter John Arlitt just two weeks later.
Citing health issues and concern over possible litigation over the manner in which he was installed, Mr. Arlitt bailed out of the derailed promotion, claiming to put it all back in Mr. Harris's control, on Feb. 28 of this year.
Tracing through the murky morass, if a legally constituted board of directors dismissed Mr. Harris and did not get around to appointing a successor, and if Mr. Alexander did not have the requisite voting power to give effect to the subsequently announced corporate changes, it may well be that Conversion has not had a properly appointed chief executive officer since Nov. 2, 2006.
Setting aside the convoluted corporate intricacies, of course, Mr. Harris is clearly the de facto and uncontested head of the skunky promotion.
Given that penniless Conversion is little more than a messy shell with no verifiable assets that is being sued by the SEC and is the subject of a criminal investigation, it does not seem likely that anyone will be challenging Mr. Harris for the title of chief executive officer.
In a following fourth and final article in this particular series, Stockwatch will examine Mr. Harris's belated slipshod response to the SEC lawsuit and review some of his more recent outlandish claims as Conversion's leader.
In lacklustre grey market trading, only 60,100 shares changed hands as Conversion closed at 1.5 cents on May 10.
Comments regarding this article may be sent to lwebb@stockwatch.com.
(More information regarding Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp. is available in Stockwatch articles published on Oct. 13, 16, 18, 20, 24 and 26; Nov. 2, 3, 7, 10 and 16; Dec. 5, 7 and 11, 2006; and May 9 and 10, 2007.)
© 2007 Canjex Publishing Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: anniebonny5/12/2007 12:53:02 PM
   of 4611
 
And the funniest response from a HSMer - at one time a full believer but now has developed a sense of humor:
Yesterday, 07:14 PM   #5289
RisingPhoenix
HSM Addict

 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,562



__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by bohogirl
What I like is that Lee Webb finds this 'penniless messy shell with no verifiable assets etc' important enough to write 3 'articles' about in as many days, with a 4th one coming.
Just seems odd to me, if you know what I mean
__________________

Lee Webb is simply a BASHER!!!! is he short?!?

i'm glad i didn't listen to his crappy articles!!!! if i had, who knows i would have done something crazy like selling @ 4$ and run to the hills!!

CSHD LONG!!!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: anniebonny5/12/2007 12:53:54 PM
   of 4611
 
A few posts by Rufus and Lee about the articles:

By: carmelbeach
11 May 2007, 01:36 AM EDT Msg. 1091 of 1094
(This msg. is a reply to 1090 by TheFraudStopper.)
Jump to msg. #  Go
Rufus Paul Harris Replies to Lee Webb

and Vice Versa

Posted by: kpn06
In reply to: None
Date:5/10/2007 5:52:45 PM
Post #148235

Lee;

I have reviewed some of your publishing’s; Annddd there is several fraudulent comments, misleading statements all designed to influence investors.

Let’s Hope when this is finished that no shareholders contact me and say that they sold their shares in CSHD solely based on your publications because I promise you that no disclaimer will protect StockWatch. com and yourself.*

Mark this date Thursday, May 10, 2007 our day is coming.

Shareholders keep your head above the water, God Bless and GODSPEED

Rufus Paul Harris
Chief Executive Officer
Conversion Solutions Holdings Corporation
www.cshd. us

Just in case it is deleted

People this has been a long time coming for me, I have watched people like this Lee M Webb manipulate the market and purposely hold shorted stocks down.

The day that this is finished will be glorious

Thank You Lord for the blessing and opportunity you have laid before us
-----------------------------------

STOCK WATCH

You Sir; Have now become my next project!!

“I promise you this; You will also remember my name for the rest of your life!!”

When I finish with the SEC and the Market Manipulators in Federal Court, I will start with you.

My IP so can confirm who this is!! 76. 97. 96. 225

Rufus Paul Harris Chief Executive Officer Conversion Solutions Holdings Corporation CSHD. US

Chief Executive Officer Conversion Solutions Holdings Corporation CSHD. US


Posted by Rufus Paul Harris @ 2007-05-10 13:41
------------

Lee;

I have reviewed some of your publishing’s; Annddd there is several fraudulent comments, misleading statements all designed to influence investors.

Let’s Hope when this is finished that no shareholders contact me and say they sold their shares in CSHD solely based on your publications because I promise you that no disclaimer will protect StockWatch.com and yourself.

Mark this date Thursday, May 10, 2007 our day together is coming.

Shareholders keep your head above the water, God Bless and GODSPEED

Rufus Paul Harris Chief Executive Officer Conversion Solutions Holdings Corporation www.cshd. us


Posted by Rufus Paul Harris @ 2007-05-10 14:24
---------------

Mr. Harris:

You Sir; Have now become my next project!!

“I promise you this; You will also remember my name for the rest of your life!!”

When I finish with the SEC and the Market Manipulators in Federal Court, I will start with you.

Well, good luck with all that.

By the way, in the event you cannot afford a Stock watch subscription, you can sign up for a 30-day free trial and access the dozen or so archived articles I have written about your incredible promotion.

Among other things, including historical trading data, you will also be able to access all of your fluffy news releases.

Perhaps it will help with your various projects.

Regards,

Lee


Posted by Lee M. Webb @ 2007-05-10 20:06
--------------------
____________________
* now where have I heard this threat before? Isn't that sweet that Rufus is still looking out for his shearedholders! Time for another Cease and Desist letter and a demand from the shearedholders to sue the guy. Oh and by the way shearholders you have to hire your own lawyer to do so - since YOU are the ones that were harmed and NOT Rufus.
When is this dang thing going to end in a "CLANG"?????

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: anniebonny5/12/2007 1:39:54 PM
   of 4611
 
And a 4th in recent Lee Webb series:
Conversion Solutions CEO files foggy answer to SEC suit


2007-05-11 19:44 ET - Street Wire

by Lee M. Webb

Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp.'s chief executive officer Rufus Paul Harris, back in control as the de facto and uncontested leader of the smelly promotion now wallowing on the grey market, has filed a sloppy, confused and belated answer to a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) fraud lawsuit filed last October.

As previously reported by Stockwatch, the SEC suspended the purported multibillion-dollar company, then trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, and filed a civil suit against Conversion and Mr. Harris in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on Oct. 24, 2006.

The SEC action came just eight days after Conversion filed a strikingly deficient annual report "created" by Mr. Harris and followed up with a fluffy news release that pegged the company's purported "asset portfolio" consisting primarily of bonds at approximately $7.3-billion, supposedly giving the OTC-BB promotion a book value of $70.71 per share as of Oct. 16, 2006. (All amounts are in U.S. dollars.)

According to the SEC complaint and supporting documentation, however, the outlandish claims made by Conversion and Mr. Harris are absolute rubbish.

Among other things, the U.S. regulator claims that Conversion and its chief executive officer committed securities fraud by making a series of false or misleading statements through news releases and SEC filings with respect to owning billions of dollars worth of bonds, fraudulently inflating the share price and trading volume in the process.

The SEC also alleges that Mr. Harris knowingly recorded fictitious assets and certified fraudulent financial statements.

The day after filing the lawsuit, the U.S. regulator obtained a temporary restraining order enjoining the company and Mr. Harris from committing further fraud.

At the Oct. 25, 2006, hearing regarding the motion for a temporary restraining order, Judge Clarence Cooper admonished Mr. Harris to hire an attorney to represent the company. That admonishment was ignored.

The SEC went on to obtain unopposed orders imposing preliminary injunctions against the defendants and, with no attorney filing even so much as an appearance for either Mr. Harris or Conversion, followed up with entries of default against them last November.

With diversions wearing thin and unrest growing among even some of Conversion's more devoted fans, Mr. Harris finally got around to slapping together a sloppy response to the SEC complaint toward the end of April.

While some disillusioned shareholders are appalled at the lawyerless filing and other observers find it laughable, many of Conversion's cultish Internet followers who congregate on a chat forum opened by the semi-literate Georgia promoter and regularly profess their complete faith in the company's leader, are in a near-rapturous tizzy over the development.

According to the assessment of a surprising number of remarkably naive Conversion shareholders, the crafty Mr. Harris has led the SEC, along with nasty naked short sellers and other perceived market miscreants, into a clever trap and now has them right where he wants them.

The SEC, which wants Mr. Harris permanently banned from serving as an officer or director of any public company, has not yet responded to the muddled and long past due answer filed on April 24.

The foggy answer

Setting aside the matter of the unaddressed entries of default against the defendants, the sloppiness of Mr. Harris's answer in which he denies the SEC's substantive allegations is evident from the outset.

Notwithstanding Judge Cooper's very clear admonishment that Conversion had to be represented by legal counsel, Mr. Harris's pro se filing is headed "DEFENDANT CONVERSION SOLUTIONS HOLDING'S ANSWER AND DEFENSES TO COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF."

While much of the filing is actually given over to Mr. Harris's personal defences and responses to the complaint, he attempts to slip in a number defences and answers on behalf of the company, which he sometimes identifies by name and at other times refers to as CHSC or its trading symbol, CSHD.

As a first shaky defence, Mr. Harris says that the complaint "and each and every allegation considered separately fails to sate a claim against Rufus Paul Harris upon which relief can be granted and it should therefore be dismissed."

Mr. Harris, who entered a general appearance and acknowledged service of the complaint in another filing, then briefly advances second and third defences based on insufficiency of process and insufficiency of service of process, respectively.

Ignoring Judge Cooper's instructions, the Georgia promoter next slips in a defence of improper venue on behalf of Conversion.

The sloppy filing has a heading for a fifth defense, but nothing appears under that heading and Mr. Harris just skips on to a sixth defence comprising a denial of all of the allegations regarding false and misleading statements and violations of securities laws by Conversion and Mr. Harris made in the opening four paragraphs of the SEC's complaint.

Oddly, while the SEC complaint, exactly mirroring language used in an information and disclosure statement and regulatory filings submitted by Mr. Harris, identifies Conversion as a company with its principal place of business in Kennesaw, Ga., which was incorporated in Delaware as Conversion Solutions Inc. on Feb. 11, 2005, the Georgia promoter denies all of that.

Mr. Harris goes on to deny that the Georgia court is the proper venue for the case or that it has jurisdiction over the complaint against him.

That denial is hard to square with Mr. Harris's Nov. 7, 2006, consent to the entry of a preliminary injunction against him in which he specifically admits the court's jurisdiction over the matter.

Mr. Harris's disregard of Judge Cooper's admonishment that the corporation must be represented by an attorney continues as he moves further into his answer and repeatedly serves up denials of specific allegations against the company. Indeed, the promoter slips in almost 20 claims on behalf of Conversion.

The sloppiness of the muddled filing continues, too, as Mr. Harris evidently gets confused while attempting to respond to the SEC complaint paragraph-by-paragraph.

For example, in answering paragraph 12 of the SEC complaint, Mr. Harris responds with a reference to paragraph 13 and his response to paragraph 20 is actually an answer to paragraph 19.

Deeper into the filing, Mr. Harris answers the regulator's paragraph 31 regarding Conversion's share price with a claim that he can neither admit or deny the unrelated allegations in paragraph 18 regarding a Venezuelan bond issue.

Similarly, in response to paragraph 33 regarding the effect of the company's fraudulent press releases on the stock price and trading volume, Mr. Harris denies all of the allegations in paragraph 25, which actually comprises an unrelated allegation that some, and possibly all, of the $500-million Venezuelan bond issue claimed by the company was actually owned by other entities.

Approaching the end of the confused filing, Mr. Harris demands that he be discharged without liability to the SEC, with all costs against the regulator.

Strangely, Mr. Harris asks the court to deny the issuance of any temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, both of which have already been issued by Judge Cooper. Moreover, the preliminary injunction was issued with the Georgia promoter's specific consent.

Mr. Harris also wants the court to deny the issuance of any order enjoining the defendants from operating the business affairs of the company or any order prohibiting Mr. Harris from exercising his duties as Conversion's chief executive officer.

Finally, Mr. Harris asks the court to immediately halt trading in Conversion until the lawsuit is resolved.

It remains to be seen just how much luck Mr. Harris will have with any of that.

In the meantime, Mr. Harris has been boasting about the impending market shakeup that he has engineered and regaling his gullible Internet followers with other incredible tales.

More fantastic tales

Mr. Harris has recently been suggesting that he will be dragging the chief executive officers of every brokerage firm that has been trading Conversion's shares into court and forcing them to open up their books.

The promoter also claims that he has 14 subpoenas to serve, evenly split among Georgia, Washington and Europe. It is not clear just how Mr. Harris thinks he can split 14 documents evenly over three locations.

"When I stated that 'You will remember my name for the Rest of your life' I meant it," Mr. Harris boasted to his Internet following on April 26.

"Before I am done with the short selling crooked Busters we will lose most of this countries (sic) MM by fleeing the country," he continued. "This post is to the Few and Crooked, the Market Makers.

"I have enough foreign support to crush you, my dancing shoes are on, I am all dressed up and our song is playing."

On April 27, Mr. Harris served up some outrageous and unsubstantiated claims about his past business exploits to his adoring chat site members.

"The only dealings I have had with the US Treasury was when I was given a Mandate from the Vatican to arrange a 500 Billion USD Buy of USA Treasuries," Mr. Harris remarked in response to a question from one of the site members.

"Well we turned it over to Ed Ingles in the White House who at the time was the White House liaison to the Treasury Department," the Georgia promoter went on when prompted for more details.

"The last phone call I received about it from the Vatican was that they got screwed with the notes they were given," he added.

According to Mr. Harris, the Vatican mandate was not his only major financial assignment.

"The most recent Mandate that I received was from Congress," Mr. Harris claimed.

One of the Georgia promoter's staunchest supporters, Robert Fry, an ordained minister who frequents the chat site and has managed to tally more than 1,900 posts since early February, asked whether the site members would ever know which members of Congress gave Mr. Harris the mandate.

"Sir, it was voted by the entire Hill," Mr. Harris replied.

Not surprisingly, Mr. Harris was prompted for more details about that purported mandate and he obliged with some more outlandish claims.

"The mandate was originally passed to pump 4 trillion into the USA commodities market, to be more precise the Chicago Merk (sic); My original plan was to reform the railroads and steel market, it also included a deal with Canada for their massive titanium deposit," the promoter claimed.

"My plan was to take the titanium ore and create a new steal (sic) product," he continued. "The details are massive and would take a lot of typing to explain, but that is the just (sic) of it."

Another poster wanted to know what happened next.

"Part of the deal was that 50 Billion went to the Removal and Restoration of the Twin Towers," Mr. Harris replied.

Someone else who has been a stalwart supporter asked Mr. Harris to provide a scan "of some simple Vatican Seal Document or Congressional Document" with his name and a date.

"Just little shreds of proof will be sufficient," the poster implored. "I believe don't get me wrong, but I am starting to question my own sanity."

"All will get to see the documents in court," Mr. Harris declared. "And Friend I don't really care who believes it, the old saying comes into play, time will tell all."

More recently, picking up on one of his chat site member's comments about a "mountain of sour mortgage paper," Mr. Harris has been spouting off about another purported endeavour.

"It is very strange that you say that; we have been asked to draft a collateral system to save the failed Mortgage paper," the imaginative Mr. Harris remarked in a May 8 post.

"Hmm some of you are very smart people or you are already in the I know boat," the promoter added.

More recently still, Mr. Harris, who has touted wild projects for Conversion such as building "an alternative national education system" for the entire U.S. and establishing "a permanent lunar facility that can sustain human and plant life indefinitely," has identified a new future "project."

"You Sir; Have now become my next project!!" Mr. Harris exclaimed in response to a May 10 Stockwatch article written by this reporter.

"I promise you this; You will also remember my name for the rest of your life!!" the Georgia promoter went on.

"When I finish with the SEC and the Market Manipulators in Federal Court, I will start with you," he declared.

Back among his gullible followers on his members-only chat forum, Mr. Harris had more to say.

"People this has been a long time coming for me, I have watched people like this Lee M Webb manipulate the market and purposely hold shorted stocks down," the apparently fantasy-prone Mr. Harris blustered wildly.

"The day that this is finished will be glorious," he proclaimed. "Thank You Lord for the blessing and opportunity you have laid before us."

Meanwhile, apart from Mr. Harris's cultish followers, investors have paid scant attention to the Georgia promoter's foggy filing in response to the SEC complaint, his claims of a massive market makeover or other fantastic tales.

With only 61,800 shares changing hands on the grey market, Conversion closed out the week at a penny.

Stockwatch will continue to follow developments as the saga continues.

Comments regarding this article may be sent to lwebb@stockwatch.com.

(More information regarding Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp. is available in Stockwatch articles published on Oct. 13, 16, 18, 20, 24 and 26; Nov. 2, 3, 7, 10 and 16; Dec. 5, 7 and 11, 2006; and May 9, 10 and 11, 2007.)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

From: anniebonny5/13/2007 10:40:05 PM
1 Recommendation   of 4611
 
SEC response to Rufus' last filing: Strike the Answer
investorshub.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: anniebonny who wrote (4171)5/14/2007 12:00:03 PM
From: Star the Wonder Pup   of 4611
 
Looks like rufus is bowing up for an insanity defense, which in his case may be true.

It didn't help Wanta, however, who reminds me very much of Roofie. Leo went to the slammer.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Star the Wonder Pup who wrote (4173)5/14/2007 9:49:59 PM
From: anniebonny   of 4611
 
Weird you should say that. Did you know Rufus supposedly had a stroke at the age of 31 or 32? He talked about it in the earlier Paltalk days. Seems to me he could use having some left over brain damage as an insanity defense. Always wondered why someone at the age would have had a stroke.
Guess it comes with the territory. Old TUT plead leaving for "health reasons". Guess the stress of running a scam can get to you, not to mention being a chronic smoker and apparently quite the drinker according to his wife OLGA.

Cripes not to mention always with a Crown Royal and Sprite in one hand and an asthma inhaler in the other.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: anniebonny who wrote (4174)5/14/2007 9:50:57 PM
From: anniebonny   of 4611
 
Also been wondering about this Charity thing myself...
Posted by: Dimension
In reply to: xlr8rs who wrote msg# 148294

Date:5/14/2007 2:09:58 AM
Post #of 148327

Hi XLR, What do you think about all the millions Alexander and his wife dumped in the name of charity? You are pretty close to them...what charity is it they gave all those millions to?


Posted by: xlr8rs
In reply to: Dimension who wrote msg# 148321

Date:5/14/2007 12:15:43 PM
Post #of 148327

LOL, Dimmy -- I'm not close enough to be privy to that information. Like everyone else, I really would like to know, but I doubt that we ever will. I have a few ideas of where some of it may have gone, but nothing to back it up ... I do know that I didn't get any :(




Posted by: Dimension
In reply to: xlr8rs who wrote msg# 148324

Date:5/14/2007 5:27:09 PM
Post #of 148327

i asked him about the charity...he told me that is a question for the SHC to decide if they want to reveal. isn't that an odd response? maybe you can ask your fellow SHC members (or former members)...i'm sure dogman might have a clue.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: anniebonny who wrote (4171)5/15/2007 6:49:07 PM
From: Gib Bogle   of 4611
 
I like the bit about creating a new steal product. Does Rufus have a sense of humour?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.