Biotech / Medical | Provectus Pharmaceuticals Inc.


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Howard Williams who wrote (11219)5/3/2012 8:37:11 AM
From: Howard Williams   of 11958
 
Reminder ..... PVCT interactive webcast at 1:00 PM ET today

DATE: May 3, 2012
TIME: 1:00 PM EDT
LINK: www.retailinvestorconferences.com > red "register / watch event now" button

This will be a live, interactive online event where investors are invited to ask the company questions in real-time - both in the presentation hall as well as in the company's "virtual trade booth."

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Howard Williams5/3/2012 12:59:39 PM
   of 11958
 
Having a helluva time logging in ........

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: jm2i1235/3/2012 1:05:52 PM
1 Recommendation   of 11958
 
hey NTTG, looking fwd to your "analysis" on today's webcast...ahahaha

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: jm2i123 who wrote (11236)5/3/2012 1:39:04 PM
From: NTTG3 Recommendations   of 11958
 
Now you want my opinion????? How strange.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: NTTG who wrote (11237)5/3/2012 2:17:56 PM
From: jm2i1232 Recommendations   of 11958
 
your opinion? na....

your "objective analysis".....hihi

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: jm2i123 who wrote (11238)5/3/2012 5:17:42 PM
From: Mammon2 Recommendations   of 11958
 
Well, I listened. In my ever objective opinion, it was fascinating and encouraging.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Littlebits5/3/2012 9:01:52 PM
   of 11958
 
Interesting commentary on IL-2; i.e. risk vs. benefit:

themelanomacenter.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: travisnye5/5/2012 9:14:06 PM
2 Recommendations   of 11958
 
Graphics; I know this will sound odd. It is and it seems odd to me too. Yes, I'm optimistic. Not a cheerleader but a fan. Paid for a ticket to attend. Intend to cheer but will leave the leading to the principal players.
Sports Color; This is not being played on the 50 yard line. The ball has advanced, though perhaps not the score. From where I sit, the PVCT team is in "enemy" territory. (the opposing, imposing disease's)
But what do I know? Only what I read, hear and see. I read fascinating analysis outcomes. I hear cheering and booing and am in no way disturbed or surprised by the interplay.
What I want to mention is what I see. The chart. The field position. I saw the completion of an eight month form and waited a prescribed period I mentioned at the point of its completion; that being the completion of an Inverted Head and Shoulders. I thought three weeks would be a reasonable pause for the cause. Which way would it go? Up of course, based on the inverse of a Head and Shoulders' typical, long observed, likely outcome. (and my optimism)
Well, here we are. Three weeks later. I know what is observable. It looks like a flattening of the price. Possibly a basing of the price. The trend has not reversed. The form has not realized its possibilities. Will it? I see no suggestion of it. This is the odd part... I do not consider this improper. I am quite satisfied not seeing any hint of this going anywhere one way or the other right now, for now. If it is going to go anywhere soon, not seeing any hint of it is very OK, suggesting to me, there is no leaking of hints, and that is the way I like it and think it should be. If it's going somewhere soon, it is not for the cheering or the booing to know. It will be known with the completion of plays and by the playing. The quiet unfolding held up until the moment of "hike". Reading of lips, meanings of words, prior, similar experiences suggesting something or the other; none of it being revealed in the count or by the count. No leaning to the right or left, to the up or the down. I consider the anticipation and the doubt, the hesitation and the hope, the not knowing or having hints suggesting the exact moment of pending movement, to be exactly the way it should be in what feels to me like a suspenseful moment.

stockcharts.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: roadcoach5/8/2012 2:22:30 AM
3 Recommendations   of 11958
 


Q&A from the conference held May 2012






You have joined Provectus Pharmaceutivals, Inc. (PV Chat
Lloyd Goldenberg:Good morning.
Brian Rockowitz:Good morning to you
Lloyd Goldenberg:Hi Brain.
Lloyd Goldenberg:Uh, Brian.
mike hochstat:mike hochstat hello
Jean Parodi:Hi Evyone
Joe Baff:Good afternoon everyone
Janell Karimoto:Thank you, Peter!
Ky Pham:Good presentation!
Craig Dees, Ph.D.:thank you!
Janell Karimoto:If anyone missed the PVCT presentation, all presentations will be available on-demand for 90 days, beginning at the close of today's event at 7pm ET. Please return at any time and the archived presentations will be available 24/7 in the Auditorium.
Jack McHugh:Peter mentioned that the burn rate will drop significantly this year essentially "because R&D is shutting down". My question is Why? With so much R&D work to be done to move along PV-10 in Liver, Pancreas, and in combination therapies, why would slowing or shutting down R&D be appropriate at this point?
Jerry Iverson:When my golden retriever was diagnosed with a melanoma I linked to an Australian vet clinic using rose bengal in their treatment. I noticed from one of the charts the positive response in animal studies. Do you think pv 10 can be an important veterinary tool and what are the hurdles to approval and the market for pv10.
Craig Dees, Ph.D.:Jack, we will do much more R&D when we have the cash. I said the burn rate goes down because we don't want to dilute too much.
Craig Dees, Ph.D.:Jack, so, expect the R&D to go up when we get the proceeds from the derm transaction and any oncology transaction. Sorry I (Peter) didn't make that clear enough.
Craig Dees, Ph.D.:Jack, feel free to reach out to me (Peter) with any further interest in the R&D topic. Thank you. Peter
Craig Dees, Ph.D.:Jerry, we know PV-10 has been used on many "veterinary subjects" or pets in many cases. We believe PV-10 will be used much more once it is approved in humans first. Our focus is getting PV-10 approved ASAP so then it can be used for our pets if need be. Thank you.
Jack McHugh:Thanks, Peter. What is the ongoing cost of the Moffitt studies and who is paying for it? The more work they do, the better the validation for PV-10.
Craig Dees, Ph.D.:Exactly Jack, the more the better. After the initial studies they paid for, we signed a grant to them for approx. $102K. We have paid about half of that already. Not much cost for all the work they are doing. We will likely do more grants, but this is not very expensive of course for us to manage.
Jack McHugh:Agreed -- a bargain at twice the price, as they say. What is the anticipated timeline for releasing results of the new work they are undertaking?
Craig Dees, Ph.D.:That is the question; namely, when more results will be released. We know they have more studies completed. We know they are trying to determine how much to release and when. We will let everyone know ASAP when we know. They want a "bigger splash" next time 'round, we understand.
Jack McHugh:Understood; I'm sure everyone connected with PVCT hopes for a bigger splash next time 'round, but only time will tell. Hardened investors in biotech always say "the data is the only voice I pay attention to", so the more data PVCT can give a voice to, the more investors will listen.
Craig Dees, Ph.D.:Precisely Jack. We know our final full Phase 2 melanoma data is coming this year too, along with expected publication of that and our liver and derm data, besides more immunology data. All this is helpful of course.
Jack McHugh:Agreed -- what would also be a helpful signal is management buying stock in the open market (not just exercising options). Buying one's own stock with one's own money is another voice worth listening to.
Craig Dees, Ph.D.:Yes, agreed Jack. That is why Eric and I (Peter) in particular exercise stock options. Our corporate counsel has advised us to buy stock this way versus in the open market because they believe we'll manipulate the stock by buying in the open market.
Jack McHugh:Your corporate counsel is inaccurate. Officers of public companies buy company stock in the open market every single day. Officers must simply avoid buying during certain periods of time set by the SEC.
Craig Dees, Ph.D.:Jack, it is much more problematic being on the OTCBB unfortunately. That is the problem. The open windows exist but because our buying a thinly traded stock by definition, our corporate counsel has advised against it.
Craig Dees, Ph.D.:Jack, if you have any examples of bulletin board companies where execs buy stock in the open market, please let me know. We are not aware of any. Thank you.
Jack McHugh:I'll take a look. What are the obstacles to a regular NASDAQ listing? I know a $1/share stock price is one, but what are the others?
Craig Dees, Ph.D.:Minimum bid is the only obstacle. Once we hit $3 per share we can get listed.
Jack McHugh:If PVCT hits 3, I'm sure you will be happy to wade through the paperwork...
Craig Dees, Ph.D.:No doubt about that Jack! Already have got the paperwork taken care of with our corporate counsel!
mike b:Is there a PVCT person online?
Craig Dees, Ph.D.:Yes, I'm (Peter) online for Craig.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: roadcoach who wrote (11242)5/8/2012 8:55:14 PM
From: SG   of 11958
 
Road,

Thanks for posting. Is that the entire conference call?

SG

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.