Subjects
Public Msgs
Members
Member Profiles
My Private Msgs
Yahoo! Quote
Advanced Search
[
sign in
]
Sponsor
Biotech / Medical
|
Provectus Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Previous 10
|
Next 10
From:
okiboji
4/25/2012 1:31:27 PM
 
of 11980
bought this stock recently. what do you think the stock goes to after a derm deal? how about an onc deal? both?
Provectus Pharmaceuticals Inc. | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Recommend
| Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
To:
NTTG
who wrote (
11186
)
4/25/2012 1:49:16 PM
From:
PCskibum
1 Recommendation
 
of 11980
I'm just why you want this company to fail so badly?
Provectus Pharmaceuticals Inc. | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Recommend
| Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
|
Read Replies (2)
To:
PCskibum
who wrote (
11190
)
4/25/2012 2:47:06 PM
From:
Mammon
1 Recommendation
 
of 11980
I'm no expert on the FDA and its proceedings, but a quick google search came up with this document about Incyte's dealings with the FDA and how many iterations they went through before reaching a trial design consensus for an SPA with the FDA. The articles notes "Levy estimated the company spent about five months and went through three iterations before reaching consensus with the FDA on the SPA." And this was after a much longer period of time back and forth on the trial design.
Let me say this again, in case anyone started drinking early today. The word ITERATIONS is mentioned in the context of interfacing with the FDA regarding an acceptable trial protocol.
docs.google.com
Provectus Pharmaceuticals Inc. | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Recommend
| Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
|
Read Replies (1)
To:
LT2011
who wrote (
11183
)
4/25/2012 2:52:27 PM
From:
Mammon
2 Recommendations
 
of 11980
ah, lt2011 talking back and forth with nttg. amusing.
Provectus Pharmaceuticals Inc. | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Recommend
| Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
To:
Mammon
who wrote (
11191
)
4/25/2012 3:18:07 PM
From:
NTTG
2 Recommendations
 
of 11980
No surprise that the FDA was willing to 'iterate' with INCYTE, presentation and published track record made them worthy partner for developing a SPA....maybe find an example closer to the PVCT model.
incyte.com
incyte.com
Provectus Pharmaceuticals Inc. | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Recommend
| Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
|
Read Replies (2)
To:
NTTG
who wrote (
11193
)
4/25/2012 3:37:13 PM
From:
TheMaster
1 Recommendation
 
of 11980
Work in Healthcare? More like a career politician or lawyer who got caught with his hand in the cookie jar!
Provectus Pharmaceuticals Inc. | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Recommend
| Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
To:
NTTG
who wrote (
11193
)
4/25/2012 3:55:32 PM
From:
Mammon
2 Recommendations
 
of 11980
you're just being obfuscatory now. first, it's "no iterations" then when called on the absolute wrongness of your position, it's followed by "oh, well, they'll iterate with them." Pick a choice and stick with it. You remind me of a bad trial lawyer trying to make a defense stick, any defense.
Oh, and why don't you and lt2011 talk a little more. You seem to always have fun together, you two.
Provectus Pharmaceuticals Inc. | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Recommend
| Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
|
Read Replies (2)
To:
Mammon
who wrote (
11195
)
4/25/2012 4:09:02 PM
From:
TheMaster
1 Recommendation
 
of 11980
Did You read my post? He always does the exact same thing hes like an Ink Blot. Once cornered and u step on him he splashes somewhere else?
Provectus Pharmaceuticals Inc. | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Recommend
| Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
To:
Mammon
who wrote (
11195
)
4/25/2012 5:21:07 PM
From:
NTTG
2 Recommendations
 
of 11980
Not really. The decision at 45 days is all or none. The company either gets approval based on the submission or they don't. During the review the FDA typically does not ask for supplemental information, and I have never heard of a reviewer calling the company for 'clarification' on a point. They review the application as written.
For applications that do not get approved notification may include insight on the deficiencies that need to be addressed in the revised application (generally when the company is close, I suspect per the example you cited) or they simply notify the company that the proposed study does not meet the standard (as I suspect will happen).
Either way, a new submission is the next step, and in some cases the company has to loop back to gain additional insight on where the problems were, a time consuming process for sure.
All the while the clock is ticking, and if you assume there are potential partners in the wings, they are watching.
Any luck finding an FDA approved drug that has not published this clinical trial data?
Provectus Pharmaceuticals Inc. | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Recommend
| Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
To:
PCskibum
who wrote (
11190
)
4/25/2012 5:30:23 PM
From:
NTTG
3 Recommendations
 
of 11980
I dont....as an investor I am interested in how to scope company prospects..PVCT is an interesting case study. The transformation of thought on this board from 2009 to today is testament to that...not because of my posts, but from the underlying frustration that promises made have not been delivered on.
I think if you took a survey of the PVCT longs they would generally agree that they thought the company would have been further along heading into 2012 than they are. Read the PR's, even PVCT has started to come to terms with the reality of their situation.
Provectus Pharmaceuticals Inc. | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Recommend
| Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
|
Read Replies (1)
Previous 10
|
Next 10
Home
Mail
Hot
SubjectMarks
PeopleMarks
Keepers
Settings
Terms Of Use
Contact Us
Copyright/IP Policy
Privacy Policy
About Us
FAQ
Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.