Biotech / Medical | Provectus Pharmaceuticals Inc.


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Howard Williams who wrote (11181)4/24/2012 4:34:53 PM
From: NTTG3 Recommendations   of 11967
 
FDA met with the company for two post PII meeting, then declined the third requested meeting some time ago,, told PVCT they had all the information they needed.

The SPA process we were talking about today was addressing the process after the first 45 day review response, right? "While the review process could occur in as little as 45 days from the date of submission, we expect it will be an iterative process, and thus, more time may be required to work with the FDA on a study design agreement."

That is the repetitive processes yet to come, Dees was clear about that. It appears PVCT wanted something out of the third meeting but did not get the chance...now they have to write, but are also preparing investors for the real possibility that they will miss the mark with a SPA

Who is trying to cloud the issue here Howard?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: NTTG who wrote (11182)4/24/2012 4:45:38 PM
From: LT2011   of 11967
 
NTTG for the purpose of this post let's use May 1st for the SPA process. Let's say it takes a minium of 2 meetings, what would be a reasonable timeline for a SPA? Same question again if it took 3 meetings.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: LT2011 who wrote (11183)4/24/2012 5:24:04 PM
From: NTTG2 Recommendations   of 11967
 
No way to know at this point. Really depends on what PVCT tries to get into the trial protocol, and what they do after the first round decision. What I would be looking for:


- What are they looking at for dose schedules, and number of eligible lesions?
- How many patients patients are they planning to enroll in each arm of the trial?
- Are they seriously going to try to position for a 'bystander' effect in the labeling, if so how?

The first two are easily adjusted..the third could be a struggle

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: NTTG who wrote (11184)4/25/2012 3:54:33 AM
From: PCskibum1 Recommendation   of 11967
 
Who do you work for?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: PCskibum who wrote (11185)4/25/2012 8:14:16 AM
From: NTTG2 Recommendations   of 11967
 
I work in healthcare, who do you work for?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: NTTG who wrote (11186)4/25/2012 10:42:39 AM
From: TheMaster1 Recommendation   of 11967
 
Cracker Barrel

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: TheMaster who wrote (11187)4/25/2012 11:05:02 AM
From: NTTG2 Recommendations   of 11967
 
NO, that is where I am meeting you for lunch....I was afraid this would be confusing for you.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: okiboji4/25/2012 1:31:27 PM
   of 11967
 
bought this stock recently. what do you think the stock goes to after a derm deal? how about an onc deal? both?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: NTTG who wrote (11186)4/25/2012 1:49:16 PM
From: PCskibum1 Recommendation   of 11967
 
I'm just why you want this company to fail so badly?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: PCskibum who wrote (11190)4/25/2012 2:47:06 PM
From: Mammon1 Recommendation   of 11967
 
I'm no expert on the FDA and its proceedings, but a quick google search came up with this document about Incyte's dealings with the FDA and how many iterations they went through before reaching a trial design consensus for an SPA with the FDA. The articles notes "Levy estimated the company spent about five months and went through three iterations before reaching consensus with the FDA on the SPA." And this was after a much longer period of time back and forth on the trial design.

Let me say this again, in case anyone started drinking early today. The word ITERATIONS is mentioned in the context of interfacing with the FDA regarding an acceptable trial protocol.

docs.google.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.