SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Gold/Mining/Energy | Dynasty Metals & Mining Inc


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: fraud who wrote (868)4/24/2012 5:54:00 AM
From: TheSlowLane1 Recommendation   of 1595
 
LOL...you picked a good alias for yourself. Very fitting. Was "spelchekker" not available? Ha ha ha ha ha!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: marcos who wrote (870)4/24/2012 10:43:25 AM
From: Dirtythirty   of 1595
 
In Canada we have hundreds of these lunatic fringe publications in the malls, etc. that no one reads, these "magazines" have little or no credibility in mainstream society.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Dirtythirty who wrote (872)4/24/2012 5:39:21 PM
From: marcos1 Recommendation   of 1595
 
That piece actually seemed legit, at least the one i posted, it looked like follow-up to the one the 'new' fellow posted, which whether changed from the original or not, was regarding the objections that come through the Portovelo town council ... partly negotiation stances, seems to me, but also stimulated by worries from ladies anxious about things like the town collapsing into the voids from mining ... a few uninformed and/or cantankerous people involved, standard Latam stuff nowadays, there was a time everybody was dictated to as a matter of course, laws have swung the other way now and anybody can make an objection, so then the technicians have to come out from Machala and inspect everything all over again ... this series seems to have started in june of '09 when an excavator and a wheel loader were 'impounded' and the police had to come and open a gate to get them out, council members had the official finger shaken at them and they never did that again ... then a few months later when the minister of mines brought a big delegation to the grand opening, there was a very healthy turnout in support - the community at large is strongly in favour of the mine, which gives good jobs at wages far above national average

You're right about different publications taking a slant, but largely they do so in the selectivity with which they choose stories and opinions, more than in outright lying on matters of fact ... this one, La Verdad [which translates to russian as Pravda, lol], looks to me, from those two pieces, to have played it fairly straight ... probably anti-mining in their views, yes, but they did post the follow-up which exonerated the company

Looks like the fatality in march actually happened, here's a piece in a diario from Machala -
diariocorreo.com.ec 

Tad's point on this is exactly correct - management should have put out a release on it, and having failed to do so, should be taken to task now for the lack of foresight ... can't take matters of life and death lightly, no matter who or what caused the accident, the situation demands an immediate mea culpa out of them, and a thorough review of all safety procedure ... never mind what Pan American and other outfits do or fail to do when it happens in their operations, surely we can do better

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Rocket Red who wrote (860)4/24/2012 5:57:17 PM
From: marcos   of 1595
 
Kinross failed to make another new multi-year low today ... maybe tomorrow ... it'll be interesting to see if Burt shows up in Ecuador, this month or whenever, it's certainly in their interest to get clarification on government take, the better to be able to flog it to somebody else, if they can't finance it themselves, which looks pretty difficult considering what they're sinking into Africa [?!]

It's not in the interests of Ecuador admin to see Kinross lose FDN outright, imho ... they have to start building a reputation for dependability, generate some moderate level of trust ... the deal for Mirador with the chinese doesn't do anything in this regard, there could be any number of things going on under the table there, government to government doesn't count

One thing that could begin to help, is if one day they could accomplish just one thing before the last revision of its deadline

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: marcos who wrote (874)4/24/2012 6:11:36 PM
From: Rocket Red   of 1595
 
ecuador piece of the pie is way to big thus no deals,do they really want to deal in the first place after all these years and they still have no deals i don't believe ecuador wants to deal

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Rocket Red who wrote (875)4/24/2012 7:26:45 PM
From: sysaphus   of 1595
 
Makes no sense that Ecuador doesn't want to deal.
Ecuador IMO has more to lose if the Kinross deal fails than Kinross does.

A bit of I told you so next. I've been harping on Dmm's communications issues for quite some time and now we find out about the death of a miner which they've kept quiet.

The more I'm hearing about the way Dmm management behaves the less they professional and above board they appear.
The attempt to suppress news of a mine death is a communications issue. Hiding material information seems to be a main theme in Dynasty's culture. I doubt that type of culture is selective on what information it suppresses. From my experience they don't want to be accountable to anyone or answer any questions.
I know they won't answer any of my questions.
Will they answer any of yours?
Anyone emailed them about any of this?
What else is going on down there and who is responsible for these truly bad decisions?
Is it time to attempt to remove Washer?

Hopefully we will get some answers from Dmm soon.
If not, we very seriously need to consider organizing something more substantial than just a voting protest.
Perhaps it is time for Washer to go? He may be a great mine builder but his skills may end there.
If we need to we can go to the media and drag Sprott into it.
Dmm's management's antiquated Canadian miner mentality is no longer publicly acceptable and I doubt Sprott would appreciate that kind of publicity.

Clearly Dmm management's strategy and culture isn't doing anything positive for the share price anyway so I doubt negative publicity will hurt the share price at this point.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: sysaphus who wrote (876)4/24/2012 7:30:22 PM
From: Rocket Red   of 1595
 
how many years has it been no deals remember ecuador booted the oil companies that didn't give in to there demands

why spend money in ecuador if there is no benefit to the companies spending it

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: sysaphus who wrote (876)4/24/2012 7:34:37 PM
From: Rocket Red   of 1595
 
Kinross is in big trouble already look at there stock price bad deals,K has mines in high risk areas and the market is pounding k not a company i would own

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Rocket Red who wrote (878)4/24/2012 7:35:57 PM
From: Rocket Red   of 1595
 
I suspect its impossible to deal with ecuador government they want all the cookies for free so screw them

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: pstad604/25/2012 12:34:34 PM
   of 1595
 

Mining equities sell-off. .... From this morning's issue of Canaccord Wealth Management's Morning Coffee



Mining Sector

Lost in Space: What's in the stars?
The mining equities sell-off has left no one untouched. Junior explorer, intermediate and senior producer, no one has been immune to the risk aversion in the market. There is no specific reason why mining shares have sold off so sharply, the reasons vary day-to-day: China growth fears, European concerns, weaker commodity price outlook, disappointing 43-101, disappointing PEA, disappointing PFS, disappointing joint venture announcements, higher cost guidance, higher taxes/royalties, poor exploration results, poor production results/guidance, labour unrest, political instability, risk of expropriation, natural disasters, crappy weather, etc. Pick a day, choose an excuse. We've witnessed significant technical breakdowns with companies falling through their 200-week moving averages. Many a technical analyst would tell you these charts look broken. Companies that took advantage of one of the previous financing windows and raised capital to advance their once high profile assets, are in a "bittersweet" scenario. These bittersweet companies have had severe corrections in share price, but continue to maintain a strong cash balances. Should these companies continue to spend their treasury to advance their projects or chose to conserve capital? Only time will tell what the right course of action will be. There is however a growing list of companies that are now trading ex-ore body (trading at or near cash value). Separately, while some projects on Earth have been shelved because of poor economics, Planetary Resources Inc. plans to send an unmanned spacecraft to an asteroid and mine it for valuable metals and water that could be used in further space exploration or returned to earth. According to The Wall Street Journal, the company is backed by a group of billionaire types, including Google (GOOG)co-founder Larry Page and Hollywood director James Cameron. The company believes, "asteroids could yield "astronomical quantities" of minerals such as iron and nickel that could be used to build components for housing space explorers, and supply water for a fuel source." Rocket scientists like those at NASA say by 2025, mankind could eventually use robotic spacecraft to capture 500-tonne asteroids and bring it into orbit around the moon so that it could be explored and mined. Adventures like this could cost several hundreds of millions or a billion dollars at least. Hey, Mr. Spock. Where's the logic in that?


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.